Search

Objectives: The International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD) Surgical Oncological Procedure Definitions Committee propose a consistent terminology based on well-defined and reproducible anatomic landmarks that can be used by all who are involved in care of patients with vulvar conditions., Materials and Methods: The fundamental principles behind the new terminology contained descriptions of the area extension and depth of the surgical procedure., Results: Vulvar Surgical Topographic Anatomy LandmarksExtension. The internal border of the vulva is the hymenal ring. The genitocrural folds are the external lateral borders.The vertical line through the clitoris and the anus defines lateral portions of the vulva.The horizontal line from the upper border of the hymenal ring defines anterior and posterior portion of the vulva.Depth. The floor of the vulva is represented by the median perineal fascia or perineal membrane of the urogenital diaphragm.A. Vulvectomy1. Extension: partial/total vulvectomy. Removal of part/entire vulvar/perineal integument independent of the depth.2. Depth: superficial/deep. Removal of the most superficial layer/removal of the vulvar tissue to the superficial aponeurosis of the urogenital diaphragm and/or pubic periosteum.B. Inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy1. Superficial inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. Removal of the nodes located beside the inguinal ligament and along the great saphenous vein.2. Deep femoral lymphadenectomy. Removal of the nodes below the cribriform lamina and medial to the femoral vein., Conclusions: This terminology helps avoid confusion and promote better understanding and exchange of experiences among gynecologic oncologists involved in vulvar carcinoma care.

HPV vaccination has been introduced in clinical practice in recent years and represents the most effective strategy of primary prevention of cervical carcinoma and of female genital preneoplastic conditions. One of the major issues of the subject is represented by vaccination coverage of the target population. Since its introduction, HPV vaccine efficacy has been progressively demonstrated also towards extragenital HPV-correlated conditions and in males too. Moreover, even subjects of older age groups or subjects who already had HPV infections have been demonstrated to received benefits from vaccination, due to improvements of their immunological response. Recently, vaccine efficacy has also been investigated in terms of adjuvant administration after treatments of preneoplastic or benign conditions of the female lower genital tract caused by HPVs; preliminary results indicate an interesting and promising field of application. On this basis, in this article an analysis of the state of the art has been performed, with specific regard to the Italian scenario and with the focus of future perspectives of implementation of the HPV vaccination policy. From the available evidences, the Italian HPV Study Group recommends the extension of systematic HPV vaccination to males too, to adult subjects and also after conservative treatment of genital HPV correlated conditions.

In the current classification, squamous vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) is categorized as VIN 1, 2 and 3 according to the degree of abnormality. There is neither evidence that the VIN 1-3 morphologic spectrum reflects a biologic continuum nor that VIN 1 is a cancer precursor. The VIN 2 and 3 category includes 2 types of lesion, which differ in morphology, biology and clinical features. VIN, usual type (warty, basaloid and mixed), is HPV related in most cases. Invasive squamous carcinomas of warty or basaloid type is associated with VIN, usual type. VIN, differentiated type, is seen particularly in older women with lichen sclerosus and/or squamous cell hyperplasia in some cases. Neither VIN, differentiated type, nor associated keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma is HPV related. The term VIN should apply only to histologically high grade squamous lesions (former terms, VIN 2 and VIN 3 and differentiated VIN 3). The term VIN 1 will no longer be used. Two categories should describe squamous VIN: VIN, usual type (encompassing former VIN 2 and 3 of warty, basaloid and mixed types) and VIN, differentiated type (VIN 3, differentiated type).

Objective: To underline the usefulness of a new multidisciplinary subspecialty devoted entirely to vulvar diseases, to be termed vulvology., Study Design: Disorders of the vulva present a wide spectrum of clinical appearance, rendering clinical diagnosis difficult, if not impossible. The three types of physicians usually involved in treating the vulva (generalists, dermatologists and gynecologists) receive little training in and have little experience with vulvar problems. The end result is that women today are receiving far less than optimal care for vulvar disorders., Results: This situation can be much improved through the establishment of vulvology as a new multidisciplinary subspecialty. Vulvology can become a neutral field for research and debate and can provide a point of consolidation for all clinical care (infectious, metabolic, oncologic, neurologic, psychological, etc.) of vulvar disorders. The interdisciplinary nature of this new subspecialty will also facilitate the standardization and systematization of the currently confusing terminology and classification applicable to vulvar disorders., Conclusion: Vulvology, as a new, well-defined, multidisciplinary subspecialty, will improve the care of women with vulvar problems through the delineation of vulvologists as physicians with special expertise in this area, the establishment of clinics devoted specifically to the care of vulvar problems and the provision of education for physicians, other health care providers and the public.