351. Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria
- Author
-
Michael Hoelscher, Norbert Heinrich, and Elvira Richter
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Rifabutin ,Tuberculosis ,biology ,business.industry ,Osteomyelitis ,Isoniazid ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,biology.organism_classification ,Dermatology ,Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex ,Clarithromycin ,Immunology ,medicine ,Initial treatment ,business ,Ethambutol ,medicine.drug - Abstract
The author reported a case of mycobacterial infection, which was diagnosed after a lengthy process. However, the case is actually not one of tuberculosis in the stricter sense: the confirmed species—Mycobacterium avium intracellulare complex—belongs to the group of non-tuberculous mycobacteria. These are often found in the environment and, in cultures, are possibly only contaminants. However, in this case the diagnosis was firmly established following the criteria of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) – the specimens came from otherwise sterile body fluids (1). Microscopy using different staining methods, as mentioned in the article, is less relevant than cultures and PCR for confirming a diagnosis, since microscopy has lower sensitivity and, in contrast to the other methods, cannot differentiate between species (2). It therefore needs to be emphasized that the diagnostic mistake in the case report consisted mainly in not doing culture and PCR. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria—such as the described species—display sensitivities to anti-mycobacterial chemotherapy different from Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. After resistance testing, recommended initial treatment should therefore consist of a combination of clarithromycin, ethambutol, and, if required, rifabutin. By contrast to the treatment described in the article, however, isoniazid is not the treatment of choice (3).
- Published
- 2010