115 results on '"Grohskopf, Lisa A."'
Search Results
102. Ritonavir, Trigycerides, and Pancreatitis.
- Author
-
Perry, R. Clark, Grohskopf, Lisa A., Barnes, Robert, and Root, Richard K.
- Subjects
- *
PANCREATITIS , *PROTEASE inhibitors - Abstract
Discusses a case of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Relationship between ritonavir, triglycerides and pancreatitis; Presenting signs and symptoms; Safety profile of protease inhibitors.
- Published
- 1999
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
103. Flu activity remains below epidemic threshold.
- Author
-
Grohskopf, Lisa
- Subjects
- *
SEASONAL influenza - Abstract
The article reports that influenza activity in the U.S. has remained low for the 2011-2012 season.
- Published
- 2012
104. Chapter 34 - Occupational and Nonoccupational Exposure Management
- Author
-
Panlilio, Adelisa L. and Grohskopf, Lisa A.
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
105. List of Contributors
- Author
-
Aberg, Judith A, Abrams, Donald I, Amorosa, Val K, Ampel, Neil M, Angelino, Andrew F, Badaró, Roberto, Barouch, Dan H, Bartlett, John A, Benson, Constance A, Berggren, Ruth E, Bonnez, William, Boucher, Charles AB, Branson, Bernard M, Chauhan, Sunil, Chung, Raymond T, Celum, Connie L, Clotet, Bonaventura, Colvin, Richard A, Currier, Judith S, D'Aquila, Richard T, Danner, Sven A, Demeter, Lisa M, Dobbs, Thomas E, Dolin, Raphael, Eron, Joseph J, Jr, Fangman, John JW, Fichtenbaum, Carl J, Fischl, Margaret A, Flanigan, Timothy P, Flexner, Charles, Gatell, Jose M, Gnann, John W, Jr, Goicoechea, Miguel A, Graybill, John R, Griffiths, Paul D, Grinspoon, Steven, Grohskopf, Lisa A, Grunfeld, Carl, Gulick, Roy M, Hadigan, Colleen, Hall, Colin D, Harris, Marianne, Haubrich, Richard H, Hill, Jeffery D, Hirsch, Martin S, Hoesley, Craig J, Hogg, Robert, Huang, Laurence, Jabs, Douglas A, Johnson, Richard A, Johnson, Steven C, Johnson, Victoria A, Joly, Véronique, Johannsen, Eric C, Kamya, Moses R, Kaplan, Jonathan E, Katalama, Christine, Kessler, Harold A, Kilby, J Michael, Kim, Richard, Kimberlin, David W, Kimerling, Michael E, Klotman, Paul E, Koehler, Jane E, Kort, Jens J, Kovacs, Joseph A, Krown, Susan E, Kuhmann, Shawn E, Kuritzkes, Daniel R, Laurens, Matthew B, Laufer, Miriam K, Lennox, Jeffrey L, Little, Richard F, Lo, Joan C, Lundgren, Jens D, Mallal, Simon, Marra, Christina M, Markowitz, Martin, Martin, Nicole M, Marzolini, Catia, Masur, Henry, Mayer, Kenneth H, McDougal, J Steve, McIntyre, James, Mehandru, Saurabh, Mehta, Sanjay, Mermin, Jonathan, Miró, José M, Montaner, Julio SG, Moore, John P, Moore, Richard D, Moyle, Graeme, Mugavero, Michael J, Murphy, Holly, Murray, Henry W, Nolan, David, Panlilio, Adelisa L, Pappas, Peter G, Paredes, Roger, Patterson, Thomas F, Pau, Alice K, Pavia, Andrew T, Pham, Paul A, Pittaluga, Stefania, Price, Richard W, Polis, Michael A, Powderly, William G, Pozniak, Anton, Reichman, Richard C, Reiss, Peter, Reznik, David, Robertson, Sarah, Ruiz, Lidia, Saag, Michael, Saavedra-Lauzon, Arturo, Sattler, Fred R, Schambelan, Morris, Sereti, Irini, Sherman, Kenneth E, Singh, Kasha P, Silverman, Benjamin C, Smith, Kimberly Y, Sjøl, Anette, Spach, David H, Spudich, Serena S, Staszewski, Schlomo, Strick, Lara B, Sulkowski, Mark S, Tebas, Pablo, Telenti, Amalio, Thompson, Alex, Thorne, Jennifer E, Thorner, Anna R, Tokumoto, Jason, Treisman, Glenn J, van der Valk, Marc, Wanke, Christine A, Weiss, Louis M, Wellons, Melissa F, Wheat, Lawrence J, Wilcox, C Mel, Willig, James H, Winston, Jonathan A, Yarchoan, Robert, Yeni, Patrick, Zala, Carlos, and Zolopa, Andrew R
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
106. Interim Estimates of 2023-24 Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness - United States.
- Author
-
Frutos AM, Price AM, Harker E, Reeves EL, Ahmad HM, Murugan V, Martin ET, House S, Saade EA, Zimmerman RK, Gaglani M, Wernli KJ, Walter EB, Michaels MG, Staat MA, Weinberg GA, Selvarangan R, Boom JA, Klein EJ, Halasa NB, Ginde AA, Gibbs KW, Zhu Y, Self WH, Tartof SY, Klein NP, Dascomb K, DeSilva MB, Weber ZA, Yang DH, Ball SW, Surie D, DeCuir J, Dawood FS, Moline HL, Toepfer AP, Clopper BR, Link-Gelles R, Payne AB, Chung JR, Flannery B, Lewis NM, Olson SM, Adams K, Tenforde MW, Garg S, Grohskopf LA, Reed C, and Ellington S
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Humans, Child, Seasons, Case-Control Studies, Vaccine Efficacy, Influenza Vaccines, Influenza, Human epidemiology, Influenza, Human prevention & control
- Abstract
In the United States, annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months. Using data from four vaccine effectiveness (VE) networks during the 2023-24 influenza season, interim influenza VE was estimated among patients aged ≥6 months with acute respiratory illness-associated medical encounters using a test-negative case-control study design. Among children and adolescents aged 6 months-17 years, VE against influenza-associated outpatient visits ranged from 59% to 67% and against influenza-associated hospitalization ranged from 52% to 61%. Among adults aged ≥18 years, VE against influenza-associated outpatient visits ranged from 33% to 49% and against hospitalization from 41% to 44%. VE against influenza A ranged from 46% to 59% for children and adolescents and from 27% to 46% for adults across settings. VE against influenza B ranged from 64% to 89% for pediatric patients in outpatient settings and from 60% to 78% for all adults across settings. These findings demonstrate that the 2023-24 seasonal influenza vaccine is effective at reducing the risk for medically attended influenza virus infection. CDC recommends that all persons aged ≥6 months who have not yet been vaccinated this season get vaccinated while influenza circulates locally., Competing Interests: All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. Emmanuel B. Walter reports institutional support from Pfizer, Moderna, Seqiris, Clinetic, and Najit Technologies Inc., consulting fees from ILiAD Biotechnologies, payment from the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry, travel support from the American Academy of Pediatrics, and paid compensation for participation on the Vaxcyte Scientific Advisory Board. Yuwei Zhu reports participation on a Vanderbilt University Medical Center Data Safety Monitoring Board. Sara Y. Tartof reports institutional support from Pfizer and Genentech. Samantha M. Olson reports travel support from the Gates Foundation. Nicola P. Klein reports institutional support from Sanofi Pasteur, Merck, Pfizer, Seqirus, and GlaxoSmithKline; membership on an expert panel for a planned hepatitis E Phase II vaccine clinical trial among pregnant women in Pakistan; membership in Western States COVID-19 Scientific Safety Review Workgroup, Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine, and National Vaccine Advisory Committee Safety Subcommittee. Manjusha Gaglani reports receipt of honorarium for educational webinar presentation on respiratory viruses from the Texas Pediatric Society, Texas Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and serving as co-chair of the Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee and Chair of the Texas Respiratory Syncytial Virus Taskforce, Texas Pediatric Society. Kevin W. Gibbs reports grants or contracts from the Department of Defense and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and service as chair of the Vanderbilt University Medical Center Data Safety Monitoring Board. Adit A. Ginde reports institutional support from the NIH, the Department of Defense, AbbVie, and Faron Pharmaceuticals, consulting fees (paid to institution) from Biomeme and Seastar, and participation on data safety monitoring boards for the NIH and Emory University. Richard K. Zimmerman reports institutional support from the NIH and Sanofi Pasteur, and honorarium from Clinical Educational Alliance. Mary A. Staat reports institutional support from NIH, Pfizer, and Merck and royalties for Up-to-Date chapter on International Adoption. Stacey House reports institutional support from Seegene, Inc., Abbot, Healgen, Roche, CorDx, Hologic, Cepheid, Janssen, and Wondfo Biotech. Geoffrey A. Weinberg reports institutional support from the New York State Department of Health AIDS Institute, consulting fees from Inhalon Biopharma for participation on a Scientific Advisory Board, and honoraria from Merck & Company for textbook chapters. Marian G. Michaels reports institutional support from the National Institute on Allergy and Infectious Diseases and complimentary meeting attendance for presentation at the American Transplant Congress on respiratory viruses. Emily T. Martin reports receipt of grants or contracts from Merck. Natasha B. Halasa reports receipt of grants from Sanofi, Quidell, and Merck. Elie A. Saade reports institutional support from Protein Sciences Corporation, consulting fees, honoraria, and travel support from Johnson & Johnson and participation on a Johnson & Johnson Data Safety Monitoring Board. No other potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
107. Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2021-22 Influenza Season.
- Author
-
Grohskopf LA, Alyanak E, Ferdinands JM, Broder KR, Blanton LH, Talbot HK, and Fry AM
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Advisory Committees, Aged, COVID-19 epidemiology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S., Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Immunization Schedule, Infant, Influenza, Human epidemiology, Male, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Seasons, United States epidemiology, Young Adult, Immunization standards, Influenza Vaccines administration & dosage, Influenza, Human prevention & control, Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Abstract
This report updates the 2020-21 recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) regarding the use of seasonal influenza vaccines in the United States (MMWR Recomm Rep 2020;69[No. RR-8]). Routine annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months who do not have contraindications. For each recipient, a licensed and age-appropriate vaccine should be used. ACIP makes no preferential recommendation for a specific vaccine when more than one licensed, recommended, and age-appropriate vaccine is available. During the 2021-22 influenza season, the following types of vaccines are expected to be available: inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV4s), recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV4), and live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4).The 2021-22 influenza season is expected to coincide with continued circulation of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Influenza vaccination of persons aged ≥6 months to reduce prevalence of illness caused by influenza will reduce symptoms that might be confused with those of COVID-19. Prevention of and reduction in the severity of influenza illness and reduction of outpatient visits, hospitalizations, and intensive care unit admissions through influenza vaccination also could alleviate stress on the U.S. health care system. Guidance for vaccine planning during the pandemic is available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pandemic-guidance/index.html. Recommendations for the use of COVID-19 vaccines are available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/vacc-specific/covid-19.html, and additional clinical guidance is available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/covid-19-vaccines-us.html.Updates described in this report reflect discussions during public meetings of ACIP that were held on October 28, 2020; February 25, 2021; and June 24, 2021. Primary updates to this report include the following six items. First, all seasonal influenza vaccines available in the United States for the 2021-22 season are expected to be quadrivalent. Second, the composition of 2021-22 U.S. influenza vaccines includes updates to the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and influenza A(H3N2) components. U.S.-licensed influenza vaccines will contain hemagglutinin derived from an influenza A/Victoria/2570/2019 (H1N1)pdm09-like virus (for egg-based vaccines) or an influenza A/Wisconsin/588/2019 (H1N1)pdm09-like virus (for cell culture-based and recombinant vaccines), an influenza A/Cambodia/e0826360/2020 (H3N2)-like virus, an influenza B/Washington/02/2019 (Victoria lineage)-like virus, and an influenza B/Phuket/3073/2013 (Yamagata lineage)-like virus. Third, the approved age indication for the cell culture-based inactivated influenza vaccine, Flucelvax Quadrivalent (ccIIV4), has been expanded from ages ≥4 years to ages ≥2 years. Fourth, discussion of administration of influenza vaccines with other vaccines includes considerations for coadministration of influenza vaccines and COVID-19 vaccines. Providers should also consult current ACIP COVID-19 vaccine recommendations and CDC guidance concerning coadministration of these vaccines with influenza vaccines. Vaccines that are given at the same time should be administered in separate anatomic sites. Fifth, guidance concerning timing of influenza vaccination now states that vaccination soon after vaccine becomes available can be considered for pregnant women in the third trimester. As previously recommended, children who need 2 doses (children aged 6 months through 8 years who have never received influenza vaccine or who have not previously received a lifetime total of ≥2 doses) should receive their first dose as soon as possible after vaccine becomes available to allow the second dose (which must be administered ≥4 weeks later) to be received by the end of October. For nonpregnant adults, vaccination in July and August should be avoided unless there is concern that later vaccination might not be possible. Sixth, contraindications and precautions to the use of ccIIV4 and RIV4 have been modified, specifically with regard to persons with a history of severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to an influenza vaccine. A history of a severe allergic reaction to a previous dose of any egg-based IIV, LAIV, or RIV of any valency is a precaution to use of ccIIV4. A history of a severe allergic reaction to a previous dose of any egg-based IIV, ccIIV, or LAIV of any valency is a precaution to use of RIV4. Use of ccIIV4 and RIV4 in such instances should occur in an inpatient or outpatient medical setting under supervision of a provider who can recognize and manage a severe allergic reaction; providers can also consider consulting with an allergist to help identify the vaccine component responsible for the reaction. For ccIIV4, history of a severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any ccIIV of any valency or any component of ccIIV4 is a contraindication to future use of ccIIV4. For RIV4, history of a severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any RIV of any valency or any component of RIV4 is a contraindication to future use of RIV4. This report focuses on recommendations for the use of vaccines for the prevention and control of seasonal influenza during the 2021-22 influenza season in the United States. A brief summary of the recommendations and a link to the most recent Background Document containing additional information are available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/vacc-specific/flu.html. These recommendations apply to U.S.-licensed influenza vaccines used according to Food and Drug Administration-licensed indications. Updates and other information are available from CDC's influenza website (https://www.cdc.gov/flu); vaccination and health care providers should check this site periodically for additional information., Competing Interests: All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for the disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. Jill M. Ferdinands reports travel-related support that is unrelated to this work from the Institute for Influenza Epidemiology, which is funded in part by Sanofi Pasteur. Helen Keipp Talbot reports serving as the secretary for the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases, for which she receives no payment. No other potential conflicts of interest were disclosed. This report includes discussion of the unlabeled use of influenza vaccines in the instance of influenza vaccination of persons with a history of egg allergy. A history of severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to the vaccine or any of its components (which include egg for some vaccines) is a labeled contraindication to receipt of most IIV4s and LAIV4. However, ACIP recommends that persons with a history of allergic reaction of any severity to egg should receive any licensed, recommended influenza vaccine that is appropriate for their age and health status. Persons with a history of severe allergic reaction to egg who receive egg-based vaccines (i.e., vaccines other than cell culture–based inactivated influenza vaccine [ccIIV4] or recombinant influenza vaccine [RIV4]) should be vaccinated in an inpatient or outpatient medical setting (including, but not necessarily limited to, hospitals, clinics, health departments, and physician offices); vaccine administration in such instances should be supervised by a health care provider who is able to recognize and manage severe allergic reactions. No postvaccination waiting period is recommended specifically for egg-allergic persons. However, ACIP recommends that vaccine providers consider observing patients seated or supine for 15 minutes following administration of any vaccine (regardless of allergy history) to decrease the risk for injury should syncope occur.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
108. Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - United States, 2019-20 Influenza Season.
- Author
-
Grohskopf LA, Alyanak E, Broder KR, Walter EB, Fry AM, and Jernigan DB
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Advisory Committees, Aged, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S., Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Immunization Schedule, Infant, Influenza Vaccines adverse effects, Influenza, Human epidemiology, Male, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Risk Assessment, Seasons, United States epidemiology, Young Adult, Influenza Vaccines therapeutic use, Influenza, Human prevention & control
- Abstract
This report updates the 2018-19 recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) regarding the use of seasonal influenza vaccines in the United States (MMWR Recomm Rep 2018;67[No. RR-3]). Routine annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months who do not have contraindications. A licensed, recommended, and age-appropriate vaccine should be used. Inactivated influenza vaccines (IIVs), recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV), and live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) are expected to be available for the 2019-20 season. Standard-dose, unadjuvanted, inactivated influenza vaccines will be available in quadrivalent formulations (IIV4s). High-dose (HD-IIV3) and adjuvanted (aIIV3) inactivated influenza vaccines will be available in trivalent formulations. Recombinant (RIV4) and live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4) will be available in quadrivalent formulations.Updates to the recommendations described in this report reflect discussions during public meetings of ACIP held on October 25, 2018; February 27, 2019; and June 27, 2019. Primary updates in this report include the following two items. First, 2019-20 U.S. trivalent influenza vaccines will contain hemagglutinin (HA) derived from an A/Brisbane/02/2018 (H1N1)pdm09-like virus, an A/Kansas/14/2017 (H3N2)-like virus, and a B/Colorado/06/2017-like virus (Victoria lineage). Quadrivalent influenza vaccines will contain HA derived from these three viruses, and a B/Phuket/3073/2013-like virus (Yamagata lineage). Second, recent labeling changes for two IIV4s, Afluria Quadrivalent and Fluzone Quadrivalent, are discussed. The age indication for Afluria Quadrivalent has been expanded from ≥5 years to ≥6 months. The dose volume for Afluria Quadrivalent is 0.25 mL for children aged 6 through 35 months and 0.5 mL for all persons aged ≥36 months (≥3 years). The dose volume for Fluzone Quadrivalent for children aged 6 through 35 months, which was previously 0.25 mL, is now either 0.25 mL or 0.5 mL. The dose volume for Fluzone Quadrivalent is 0.5 mL for all persons aged ≥36 months (≥3 years).This report focuses on the recommendations for use of vaccines for the prevention and control of influenza during the 2019-20 season in the United States. A brief summary of these recommendations and a Background Document containing additional information are available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/vacc-specific/flu.html. These recommendations apply to U.S.-licensed influenza vaccines used within Food and Drug Administration-licensed indications. Updates and other information are available from CDC's influenza website (https://www.cdc.gov/flu). Vaccination and health care providers should check this site periodically for additional information., Competing Interests: The authors each report that they have nothing to disclose. This report includes discussion of the unlabeled use of influenza vaccines in the instance of influenza vaccination of persons with a history of egg allergy. A history of severe allergic reaction to the vaccine or any of its components (which include egg for some vaccines) is a labeled contraindication to receipt of most IIVs and LAIV4. However, ACIP and CDC recommended that persons with a history of allergic reaction of any severity to egg should receive any licensed, recommended influenza vaccine that is appropriate for their age and health status. Persons with a history of severe allergic reaction to egg should be vaccinated in an inpatient or outpatient medical setting (including, but not necessarily limited to, hospitals, clinics, health departments, and physician offices); vaccine administration should be supervised by a health care provider who is able to recognize and manage severe allergic reactions. No postvaccination waiting period is recommended specifically for egg-allergic persons. However, ACIP recommends that vaccine providers consider observing patients (seated or supine) for 15 minutes following administration of any vaccine to decrease the risk for injury should syncope occur.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
109. Update: Influenza Activity - United States.
- Author
-
Smith S, Blanton L, Kniss K, Mustaquim D, Steffens C, Reed C, Bramley A, Flannery B, Fry AM, Grohskopf LA, Bresee J, Wallis T, Garten R, Xu X, Elal AI, Gubareva L, Barnes J, Wentworth DE, Burns E, Katz J, Jernigan D, and Brammer L
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care statistics & numerical data, Antiviral Agents pharmacology, Child, Child Mortality, Child, Preschool, Drug Resistance, Viral, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype drug effects, Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype drug effects, Influenza B virus drug effects, Influenza, Human complications, Influenza, Human mortality, Influenza, Human virology, Middle Aged, Pneumonia complications, Pneumonia mortality, Seasons, United States epidemiology, Young Adult, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype isolation & purification, Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype isolation & purification, Influenza B virus isolation & purification, Influenza, Human epidemiology, Population Surveillance
- Abstract
CDC collects, compiles, and analyzes data on influenza activity year-round in the United States. The influenza season generally begins in the fall and continues through the winter and spring months; however, the timing and severity of circulating influenza viruses can vary by geographic location and season. Influenza activity in the United States remained low through October and November in 2015. Influenza A viruses have been most frequently identified, with influenza A (H3) viruses predominating. This report summarizes U.S. influenza activity for the period October 4-November 28, 2015.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
110. Influenza Vaccination Coverage Among Pregnant Women--United States, 2014-15 Influenza Season.
- Author
-
Ding H, Black CL, Ball S, Donahue S, Fink RV, Williams WW, Kennedy ED, Bridges CB, Lu PJ, Kahn KE, Dean AK, Grohskopf LA, Ahluwalia IB, Devlin R, DiSogra C, Walker DK, and Greby SM
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Seasons, United States, Young Adult, Influenza Vaccines administration & dosage, Influenza, Human prevention & control, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious prevention & control, Vaccination statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Pregnant women and infants are at increased risk for influenza-related complications and hospitalization. Influenza vaccination can reduce the risk for influenza-related illness among pregnant women and their infants. Since 2004, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) have recommended influenza vaccination for all women who are or will be pregnant during the influenza season, regardless of trimester of pregnancy. To assess influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women during the 2014–15 influenza season, CDC analyzed data from an Internet panel survey conducted during March 31–April 6, 2015. Among 1,702 survey respondents who were pregnant at any time during October 2014–January 2015, 50.3% reported receiving influenza vaccination before or during pregnancy, similar to the reported coverage in the preceding season. Overall, 64.9% of respondents reported receiving a provider offer of influenza vaccination, 14.8% received a recommendation but no offer, and 20.3% received no recommendation. Vaccination coverage among these groups of women was 67.9%, 33.5%, and 8.5%, respectively. Reminder systems and standing orders that allow health care personnel other than the attending provider to assess vaccination status and administer vaccination, can help to ensure that influenza vaccination is recommended and offered to a pregnant woman at each provider visit to increase pregnant women’s vaccination coverage.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
111. Influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women--United States, 2013-14 influenza season.
- Author
-
Ding H, Black CL, Ball S, Donahue S, Izrael D, Williams WW, Kennedy ED, Bridges CB, Lu PJ, Kahn KE, Grohskopf LA, Ahluwalia IB, Sokolowski J, DiSogra C, Walker DK, and Greby SM
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Health Care Surveys, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Seasons, United States, Young Adult, Influenza Vaccines administration & dosage, Influenza, Human prevention & control, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious prevention & control, Vaccination statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Pregnant women and infants are at increased risk for influenza-related complications and hospitalization. Influenza vaccination among pregnant women can reduce their risk for respiratory illness and reduce the risk for influenza in their infants aged <6 months. Since 2004, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have recommended influenza vaccination for all women who are or will be pregnant during the influenza season, regardless of trimester. To assess influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women during the 2013-14 influenza season, CDC analyzed data from an Internet panel survey conducted March 31-April 11, 2014. Among 1,619 survey respondents pregnant at any time during October 2013-January 2014, 52.2% reported vaccination before or during pregnancy (17.6% before and 34.6% during pregnancy), similar to the coverage in the preceding season. Overall, 65.1% of women reported receiving a clinician recommendation and offer of influenza vaccination, 15.1% received a clinician recommendation but no offer of vaccination, and 19.8% received no clinician recommendation or offer. Vaccination coverage among these women was 70.5%, 32.0%, and 9.7%, respectively. Continued efforts are needed to encourage clinicians to strongly recommend and offer influenza vaccination to their pregnant patients.
- Published
- 2014
112. Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) -- United States, 2014-15 influenza season.
- Author
-
Grohskopf LA, Olsen SJ, Sokolow LZ, Bresee JS, Cox NJ, Broder KR, Karron RA, and Walter EB
- Subjects
- Advisory Committees, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Immunization Schedule, Infant, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype, Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype, Influenza B virus, Influenza Vaccines adverse effects, Influenza, Human epidemiology, Seasons, United States epidemiology, Vaccines, Attenuated, Influenza Vaccines administration & dosage, Influenza, Human prevention & control
- Abstract
This report updates the 2013 recommendations by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) regarding use of seasonal influenza vaccines. Updated information for the 2014-15 influenza season includes 1) antigenic composition of U.S. seasonal influenza vaccines; 2) vaccine dose considerations for children aged 6 months through 8 years; and 3) a preference for the use, when immediately available, of live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) for healthy children aged 2 through 8 years, to be implemented as feasible for the 2014-15 season but not later than the 2015-16 season. Information regarding issues related to influenza vaccination not addressed in this report is available in the 2013 ACIP seasonal influenza recommendations.
- Published
- 2014
113. Randomized trial of clinical safety of daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate among HIV-uninfected men who have sex with men in the United States.
- Author
-
Grohskopf LA, Chillag KL, Gvetadze R, Liu AY, Thompson M, Mayer KH, Collins BM, Pathak SR, Oʼhara B, Ackers ML, Rose CE, Grant RM, Paxton LA, and Buchbinder SP
- Subjects
- Adenine administration & dosage, Adenine pharmacology, Adolescent, Anti-HIV Agents pharmacology, Boston epidemiology, CD4 Lymphocyte Count, Double-Blind Method, Follow-Up Studies, Georgia epidemiology, HIV Infections epidemiology, Humans, Hypophosphatemia chemically induced, Male, Middle Aged, Organophosphonates pharmacology, San Francisco epidemiology, Tenofovir, Treatment Outcome, Adenine analogs & derivatives, Anti-HIV Agents administration & dosage, HIV Infections prevention & control, HIV Seronegativity, Homosexuality, Male statistics & numerical data, Organophosphonates administration & dosage, Assessment of Medication Adherence
- Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the clinical safety of daily tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) among HIV-negative men who have sex with men., Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to immediate or delayed study drug (TDF, 300 mg orally per day, or placebo)., Methods: Four hundred healthy HIV-uninfected men who have sex with men reporting anal sex with another man within the previous 12 months enrolled in Atlanta, Boston, and San Francisco. HIV serostatus, clinical and laboratory adverse events (AEs), adherence (pill count, Medication Event Monitoring System, and self-report), and sexual and other sociobehavioral data were assessed at 3-month intervals for 24 months. Primary outcomes were clinical safety, assessed by incidence of AEs and laboratory abnormalities., Results: Study drug was initiated by 373 (93%) participants (186 TDF and 187 placebo), of whom 325 (87%) completed the final study visit. Of 2428 AEs reported among 334 (90%) participants, 2366 (97%) were mild or moderate in severity. Frequencies of commonly reported AEs did not differ significantly between TDF and placebo arms. In multivariable analyses, back pain was more likely among TDF recipients (P = 0.04); these reports were not associated with documented fractures or other objective findings. There were no grade ≥3 creatinine elevations; grades 1 and 2 creatinine increases were not associated with TDF receipt. Estimated percentage of study drug doses taken was 92% by pill count and 77% by Medication Event Monitoring System. Seven seroconversions occurred: 4 on placebo and 3 among delayed arm participants not yet on study drug., Conclusions: Daily oral TDF was well tolerated, with reasonable adherence. No significant renal concerns were identified.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
114. Updated U.S. Public Health Service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures to HIV and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis.
- Author
-
Panlilio AL, Cardo DM, Grohskopf LA, Heneine W, and Ross CS
- Subjects
- Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional, Anti-HIV Agents therapeutic use, HIV Infections prevention & control, HIV Infections transmission, Occupational Exposure
- Abstract
This report updates U.S. Public Health Service recommendations for the management of health-care personnel (HCP) who have occupational exposure to blood and other body fluids that might contain human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Although the principles of exposure management remain unchanged, recommended HIV postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) regimens have been changed. This report emphasizes adherence to HIV PEP when it is indicated for an exposure, expert consultation in management of exposures, follow-up of exposed workers to improve adherence to PEP, and monitoring for adverse events, including seroconversion. To ensure timely postexposure management and administration of HIV PEP, clinicians should consider occupational exposures as urgent medical concerns.
- Published
- 2005
115. Antiretroviral postexposure prophylaxis after sexual, injection-drug use, or other nonoccupational exposure to HIV in the United States: recommendations from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
- Author
-
Smith DK, Grohskopf LA, Black RJ, Auerbach JD, Veronese F, Struble KA, Cheever L, Johnson M, Paxton LA, Onorato IM, and Greenberg AE
- Subjects
- Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active economics, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Environmental Exposure, HIV Infections economics, HIV Infections transmission, Humans, Risk, Time Factors, United States, Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active standards, HIV Infections prevention & control
- Abstract
The most effective means of preventing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is preventing exposure. The provision of antiretroviral drugs to prevent HIV infection after unanticipated sexual or injection-drug--use exposure might be beneficial. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Working Group on Nonoccupational Postexposure Prophylaxis (nPEP) made the following recommendations for the United States. For persons seeking care < or =72 hours after nonoccupational exposure to blood, genital secretions, or other potentially infectious body fluids of a person known to be HIV infected, when that exposure represents a substantial risk for transmission, a 28-day course of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is recommended. Antiretroviral medications should be initiated as soon as possible after exposure. For persons seeking care < or =72 hours after nonoccupational exposure to blood, genital secretions, or other potentially infectious body fluids of a person of unknown HIV status, when such exposure would represent a substantial risk for transmission if the source were HIV infected, no recommendations are made for the use of nPEP. Clinicians should evaluate risks and benefits of nPEP on a case-by-case basis. For persons with exposure histories that represent no substantial risk for HIV transmission or who seek care >72 hours after exposure, DHHS does not recommend the use of nPEP. Clinicians might consider prescribing nPEP for exposures conferring a serious risk for transmission, even if the person seeks care >72 hours after exposure if, in their judgment, the diminished potential benefit of nPEP outweighs the risks for transmission and adverse events. For all exposures, other health risks resulting from the exposure should be considered and prophylaxis administered when indicated. Risk-reduction counseling and indicated intervention services should be provided to reduce the risk for recurrent exposures.
- Published
- 2005
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.