Search

Purpose: This Phase I study was undertaken to define the toxicity, pharmacodynamics, and maximum tolerated dose of the combination of R115777, a farnesyl transferase inhibitor, with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors., Patients and Methods: Thirty patients with solid tumors received a median of 2.5 cycles (range 1-30+) through five dose levels. R115777 was administered p.o. twice daily for 14 days. Gemcitabine was infused 15 min after the ingestion of R115777 on days 1 and 8. Cisplatin was administered starting 30 min after completion of the gemcitabine infusion on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Toxicities were graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria and recorded as maximum grade per patient for each treatment cycle. At the maximum tolerated dose, accumulation of prelamin A in buccal mucosa cells of patients was evaluated as a marker of farnesyl transferase inhibition by R115777., Results: Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the most common toxicities. Dose-limiting toxicity in cycle 1 was myelosuppression with thrombocytopenia alone (4 patients), neutropenia alone (1 patient), or a combination of both (3 patients). Common nonhematologic toxicities were anorexia, rash, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue, none of which was dose limiting in the first cycle. At the maximum tolerated dose, defined as R115777 300 mg twice daily p.o., 1000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine, and 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin, inhibition of prelamin A farnesylation in buccal mucosa cells of patients was demonstrated, confirming that R115777 inhibits protein farnesylation in vivo. Nine objective responses (one complete response and eight partial responses) were documented in 27 evaluable patients., Conclusion: The combination of R115777 with gemcitabine and cisplatin was well tolerated and showed evidence of antitumor activity. The maximum tolerated dose of R115777 successfully inhibits farnesyltransferase in patients in vivo. This combination warrants further evaluation in a number of tumor types.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and irinotecan are now widely used for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. The drugs work by different mechanisms, and colon cancers do not generally manifest cross-resistance to the two agents when they are used serially. Most recently, combination regimens with irinotecan, 5-FU, and leucovorin have produced survival benefits superior to 5-FU and leucovorin. In Europe, irinotecan is most frequently combined with an infusion regimen of 5-FU, whereas in the United States bolus 5-FU has been favored until recently. The regimen, commonly known as IFL or the Saltz regimen, consists of irinotecan, bolus 5-FU, and leucovorin given weekly for 4 weeks and then repeated in 6-week cycles. Two intergroup trials reported a significant 60-day mortality rate with the IFL regimen, leading to the description of both a gastrointestinal syndrome and a vascular syndrome. Vigorous management of the gastrointestinal syndrome is now recommended. Furthermore, there are data to suggest that the infusion 5-FU combination with irinotecan appears to produce a similar survival advantage to IFL with less overall severe toxicity based on cumulative European data for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Future directions include the testing of a complex array of new agents and the incorporation of laboratory predictors of survival and response as a component of clinical trial design., (Copyright 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Colorectal cancer remains a significant cause of cancer death, and its treatment is the subject of active, ongoing investigation within all treatment modalities, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. In this review we discuss selected interesting and important research findings since the year 2000 and comment on their potential impact on the adjuvant and advanced disease management of patients with colon and rectal cancer.

Purpose: In vitro studies suggest that low-dose gemcitabine sensitizes cells to radiation therapy and that this effect persists for 48 h after drug exposure. Cisplatin is a radiation sensitizer and is also synergistic with gemcitabine in some in vitro tumor systems. Gemcitabine's radiosensitizing properties can theoretically be exploited by twice-weekly administration. This study assessed toxicity in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with radiation therapy, gemcitabine, and cisplatin., Methods and Materials: Patients with locally advanced pancreatic or gastric cancer were eligible. Gemcitabine and cisplatin were given twice weekly for 3 weeks during radiation therapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions). The starting dose of gemcitabine was 5 mg/m(2) i.v. The starting dose for cisplatin was 5 mg/m(2). Chemotherapy doses escalated every 3 to 6 patients according to a standard Phase I study design., Results: Twenty-four evaluable patients, all with pancreatic cancer, were treated on this protocol. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 2 patients, Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in 2, and Grade 4 lymphopenia occurred in 1. There was no clear relationship between chemotherapy dose and hematologic toxicity. The most common Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxic responses were vomiting (7 patients) and nausea (7 patients). Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of Grade 4 nausea and vomiting occurred in 2 of 3 patients at dose Level 6 (gemcitabine 45 mg/m(2) i.v. and cisplatin 10 mg/m(2) i.v.). Six patients were treated at dose Level 5 (gemcitabine 30 mg/m(2) i.v. and cisplatin 10 mg/m(2) i.v.) without dose-limiting toxicity., Conclusion: Gemcitabine 30 mg/m(2) i.v. twice weekly and cisplatin 10 mg/m(2) i.v. twice weekly may be given concurrently with radiation therapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) with acceptable toxicity.

Background: This study was performed to determine the efficacy of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (ACA)., Patients and Methods: Pancreatic ACA patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic disease were enrolled in a phase II study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin was given i.v. on day 1 and gemcitabine i.v. on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle. The primary end point of the trial was 6-month survival. Secondary end points included response rate, overall survival, median time to progression and toxicity., Results: A total of 47 patients were enrolled, 46 of whom were evaluable. Of those patients assessed for the primary end point 50% lived for > or =6 months. The median time to progression was 4.53 months. Five confirmed responses were seen with a median duration of response of 2.7 months. Overall, the treatment was well tolerated. However, one patient died as a result of treatment-related hemolytic uremic syndrome., Conclusions: Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin, at doses of 1000 mg/m(2) and 100 mg/m(2), respectively, showed moderate activity in patients with pancreatic ACA. Based on the results of this study further evaluation of this combination is warranted.

Background: The correlation between age at diagnosis and loss of expression of hMLH1 protein in patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) has not been evaluated systematically., Methods: Immunohistochemistry was performed for hMLH1 protein in tumor samples from 867 patients with CRC. The authors defined tumors arising in the cecum, ascending colon, and transverse colon as right-sided and tumors arising in the descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum as left-sided. Patients' gender, tumor location (side), and hMLH1 expression were analyzed by age groups., Results: The percentage of tumors with hMLH1 expression loss increased significantly with advancing age (P < 0.0001): There were no tumors in patients age < 40 years that manifested loss of hMLH1 expression, compared with 29% of tumors that manifested loss of hMLH1 expression in patients age > 90 years. Loss of hMLH1 expression occurred more often in patients with right-sided tumors (32.7% vs. 5.2% of patients with left-sided tumors; P < 0.0001) and in tumors from female patients (24.3% vs. 11.5% of tumors from male patients; P < 0.0001). There was no evidence of interaction between gender and tumor location., Conclusions: Loss of hMLH1 expression in patients with CRC was associated strongly with increasing age. hMLH1 expression loss was more pronounced in tumors from female patients and in tumors that originated on the right side of the colon. Loss of hMLH1 expression in right-sided tumors occurred in nearly 50% of patients age > 90 years. This age-related trend also was observed for males and in tumors that originated in the left colon., (Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.11206)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to define the toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity of the combination of ISIS 2503, an oligodeoxynucleotide antisense inhibitor of H-ras, and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors., Experimental Design: The target dose of ISIS 2503 on this study was 6 mg/kg/day. Twenty-seven patients (16 male, 11 female) received 97 treatment courses (median, 2; range, 1-13). Nineteen patients were treated with a fixed gemcitabine dose of 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and two escalating doses of ISIS 2503 (4 and 6 mg/kg/day) as a 14-day continuous infusion starting on day 1. In addition, 8 patients (5 male, 3 female) received a flat dose of ISIS 2503 based on ideal body weight. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Toxicities, graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, were recorded as maximum grade/patient for all treatment cycles. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed to evaluate any interaction between these two agents., Results: The most common nondose-limiting toxicity was hematological, manifested as neutropenia (5 grade 2, 7 grade 3, and 1 grade 4) and thrombocytopenia (10 grade 1, 5 grade 2, 5 grade 3, and 1 grade 4). Nonhematological toxicities included anorexia (7 grade 1, 3 grade 2, and 1 grade 3), nausea (10 grade 1 and 1 grade 3), fatigue (6 grade 1, 5 grade 2, and 3 grade 3), fever (6 grade 1, 2 grade 2, 1 and grade 3), and thrombosis associated with central lines (5). The plasma concentration of gemcitabine at the end of infusion was altered in the presence of ISIS 2503, leading to alterations on other pharmacokinetic parameters, but the observed differences were not clinically relevant. The plasma disposition of ISIS 2503 was not altered by gemcitabine coadministration. One partial response was documented in a heavily pretreated patient with metastatic breast cancer. Disease stabilization for greater than six cycles of treatment was observed in 5 patients., Conclusions: The combination of gemcitabine and ISIS 2503 was well tolerated and clinically active in this group of heavily pretreated patients. The recommended Phase II dose of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) and ISIS 2503 (6 mg/kg/day) warrants additional evaluation.

Prospective clinical trials are the gold standard for evidence-based methodology used to support changes in the practice of medicine. Clinical researchers, regulatory agencies, payers, and the public embrace the conduct of phase I, II, and III clinical trials as integral to improving patient care. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) funds a number of cooperative oncology groups to conduct such clinical trials in the United States. In order to protect enrolling patients, the NCI requires expedited reporting to allow rapid identification of severe side effects on NCI-sponsored clinical trials. However, chemotherapy drugs frequently cause predictable side effects, the rapid reporting of which would potentially overwhelm the system. This article describes the development and documents the performance of a real-time toxicity reporting system implemented by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. The goal of this system is to supplement the currently required NCI adverse event monitoring procedures and to permit study teams to identify the need to modify ongoing clinical trials. The system has proven its value in the monitoring of phase II and III trials, including trial N9741, a three-arm, phase III, advanced colorectal cancer chemotherapy study exploring combinations of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluorouracil. We believe the methods described present opportunities for improving patient safety in clinical research.

Purpose: To evaluate quality of life (QOL) and tumor response after administration of an oral chemotherapy regimen in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer., Patients and Methods: Seventy-eight patients received a mean number of 5.8 cycles of therapy. QOL data were analyzed at baseline, after every two cycles of therapy, and at the time of treatment discontinuation. The Uniscale and the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 were both utilized., Results: The confirmed response rate was 26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17% to 37%). Median survival was 11.3 months (95% CI, 9.6 to 15.1 months). Global QOL scores were unchanged over the course of therapy by either tool. Only the physical function subscale score had worsened at the end of therapy. In an analysis of responding patients, significant and durable improvements in both global QOL measures as well as select subscale scores were observed. Diarrhea and physical function QOL scores had declined at the time of treatment discontinuation. Patients who did not respond to therapy had preserved QOL scores when they were evaluated after two cycles of therapy., Conclusion: This oral treatment strategy preserved QOL in treated patients. Global QOL measures as well as several QOL subscale scores significantly improved in patients with a documented response to therapy. The profile of improved QOL components indicated that patient well-being was related to tumor response in specific and perceivable ways. Nonresponding patients reported preserved QOL during the first two cycles of therapy. QOL analysis was feasible and informative in this moderately sized multicenter phase II trial.

Metastatic colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality. Surgical resection of all known metastatic disease can be curative in selected patients. The majority of patients, however, require the consideration of systemic chemotherapy as optimal palliative treatment for their diseases. Using new effective chemotherapeutic agents such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin has resulted in a clear and clinically significant improvement in survival for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The optimal sequences and combinations of these agents as initial and salvage chemotherapy along with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin are controversial. It seems clear that it is important for all patients to have access to all 3 drugs at some point in their therapy for optimal results. Recent randomized trials of first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer in which patients were likely to have access to all 3 effective drugs demonstrated median survivals of 18-20 months. This compares favorably to median survivals of approximately 12 months for patients treated with 5-FU-based regimens alone prior to the availability of effective salvage therapy. A small but meaningful number of patients might develop resectable disease with curative intent as the result of significant tumor response to combination chemotherapy. Herein, we review recent developments in combination and sequential chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer and the implications for the optimal treatment in these patients.

Purpose: To determine the rates of survival and disease control by TNM and MAC stage in three randomized North American rectal adjuvant studies., Materials and Methods: Data were merged from 2551 eligible patients on NCCTG 79-47-51 (n = 200), NCCTG 86-47-51 (n = 656), and INT 114 (n = 1695). All patients received postoperative radiation, and 96% were randomized to receive concomitant and maintenance chemotherapy. Five-year follow-up was available in 94% of patients and 7-yr follow-up in 84%. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the distribution of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and p values were derived using the log-rank test. Time to local and distant relapse was estimated using cumulative incidence methodology. Analyses were adjusted for treatment effect using Cox proportional hazards models., Results: OS and DFS were dependent on both TN stage and NT stage (N substage within T stage and T substage within N stage). Even among N2 patients (4 or more LN+), T stage influenced 5-yr OS (T1-2, 69%; T3, 48%; T4, 38%). Three risk groups of patients were defined: (1) intermediate: T3N0, T1-2N1; (2) moderately high: T4N0, T1-2N2, T3N1; and (3) high: T3N2, T4N1, T4N2. For Group 1, 5-yr OS was 74% and 81%, and 5-yr DFS was 66% and 74%. For Group 2, 5-yr OS ranged from 61% to 69%, and for Group 3, OS ranged from 33% to 48%. Cumulative incidence rates of local relapse and distant metastases revealed similar differences by TN and NT stage, as seen in the survival analyses., Conclusion: Patients with a single high-risk factor of either extension beyond the rectal wall (T3N0) or nodal involvement (T1-2N1) have improved OS, DFS, and disease control when compared to those with both high risk factors. Different treatment strategies may be indicated for intermediate- (T3N0, T1-2N1) vs. moderately high or high-risk patients in view of differential survival and rates of relapse. For future trial design, it may be preferable to perform separate studies, or a planned statistical analysis, for the "intermediate-risk" vs. the "moderately high" or "high-risk" subsets of patients.

Background: Irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin are active agents in colorectal cancer. A sequence-dependent synergism of SN-38 followed by 5-FU/leucovorin in vitro led us to conduct a phase I trial of CPT-11 followed by 5-FU/leucovorin to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicities of this regimen and to obtain preliminary indications of its activity in patients with advanced solid tumors., Patients and Methods: Fifty-six patients were enrolled in sequential cohorts to receive escalating doses of CPT-11 (90 min infusion) on day 1, followed by leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) (intravenous push) and 5-FU (90 min infusion) on days 2-5 of each 21-day cycle., Results: A total of 347 treatment cycles (median 4, range 1-25) were administered. Dose-limiting toxicities were diarrhea, neutropenia and fatigue. Nine patients with colorectal cancer and one with gastric cancer had partial or minor responses. Eight of the 10 had prior chemotherapy., Conclusions: CPT-11 and 5-FU/leucovorin, as constituents of this novel mechanism-based schedule, have promising activity in patients who have received prior chemotherapy. The recommended phase II/III starting doses are CPT-11 275 mg/m(2) over 90 min on day 1, and 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) plus leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) on days 2-5 every 21 days. This combination can be administered safely to this schedule if there is strict adherence to the 90 min infusion time for both CPT-11 and 5-FU.

Background: Pyrazoloacridine (PZA) is the first of a new class of rationally synthesized acridine derivatives to undergo clinical testing as an anticancer agent. We previously demonstrated cytotoxic synergy between combinations of PZA and platinum compounds. Subsequent studies revealed that PZA inhibits removal of platinum-DNA adducts in cultured A549 cells. Based on these results, we undertook a phase I study of the combination of PZA and carboplatin (CBDCA)., Patients and Methods: Twenty-eight patients received 76 28-day courses (median 2.5, range 1-6) of CBDCA (30-minute infusion) followed by PZA (3-hour infusion), through six dose levels [PZA/CBDCA] (200/AUC 3, 400/AUC 3, 400/AUC 4, 400/AUC 5, 500/AUC 5, 600/AUC 5 mg/m2/AUC). Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed to evaluate the disposition of PZA. Retention of platinum-DNA adducts in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients was also evaluated., Results: The most common and dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, consisting of neutropenia and leukopenia. Non-hematologic toxicities of anorexia, nausea and stomatitis were mild to moderate. In six patients evaluated at the MTD, CBDCA did not appear to affect the pharmacokinetics of PZA. One patient with malignant melanoma had a partial response. Disease stabilization for greater than 4 courses of treatment occurred in 4 patients., Conclusion: The combination of PZA and CBDCA was well tolerated and may have utility in some tumor types.

Background: The study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (ACA)., Patients and Methods: Pancreatic ACA patients, with previously untreated advanced or metastatic disease, were enrolled in a dose escalation study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin was given intravenously on day 1 and gemcitabine intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle. Doses of both drugs were increased with sequential cohorts of patients until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed., Results: A total of 18 patients were enrolled to three dose levels. DLT of neutropenia and a severe infection was noted at a dose of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2. Hematological toxicity and nausea and vomiting were the most common grade 3/4 toxicities. The MTD, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2, was well tolerated. Three confirmed responses were seen., Conclusions: The MTD of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with pancreatic ACA was determined. A phase II study of this combination is ongoing and will be reported separately at a later date.

Purpose: To evaluate the value of thymidylate synthase (TS), Ki-67, and p53 as prognostic markers in patients with Dukes' B2 and C colon carcinoma., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of TS, Ki-67, and p53 in 465 patients with Dukes' B2 (220 patients) or Dukes' C (245 patients) colon carcinoma. Patients represent a nonrandom subset obtained from five randomized phase III trials and were treated with either surgery alone (151 patients) or surgery plus fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (314 patients). All three markers were assayed using immunohistochemical techniques., Results: With a minimum follow-up of 5 years, our retrospective analysis failed to demonstrate a consistent and significant association between TS, Ki-67, or p53 and either disease-free survival or overall survival. Exploratory analyses did not reveal a convincing explanation for these results that are in conflict with the published literature. Notable interactions were observed. In particular, high Ki-67 levels were associated with increased (decreased) survival in patients with low (high) TS intensity. Patients whose tumors stained positively for p53 seemed to benefit substantially from the use of adjuvant chemotherapy compared with those who were not treated (P =.05)., Conclusion: This retrospective investigation failed to demonstrate a significant association between TS, Ki-67, or p53 staining and clinical outcome.

Purpose: To compare the pharmacokinetics of continuous venous infusion (CVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) with that of oral eniluracil/5-FU and to describe toxicities and clinical activity of prolonged oral administration of eniluracil/5-FU., Patients and Methods: A randomized, open-label, cross-over study compared CVI 5-FU to an oral 5-FU/eniluracil combination. Seventeen patients (arm A) were randomly assigned to receive eniluracil/5-FU combination tablets (10:1 mg/m(2) BID for 7 days) during the first study period, followed by 5-FU (300 mg/m(2) CVI for 7 days) during period 2, with a 14-day washout between periods. Sixteen patients (arm B) received treatment in the opposite sequence. In period 3, all patients received eniluracil/5-FU tablets BID for 28 days. Plasma levels of 5-FU during CVI and oral administration were analyzed in periods 1 and 2. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity was determined by measuring plasma uracil, urinary alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine, and peripheral-blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) DPD activity., Results: There were no grade 3 or 4 toxicities in either arm. Partial responses were observed in three patients. Another three patients had stable disease for > or = 3 months. Eniluracil and 5-FU pharmacokinetics were similar to those observed in previous studies and were unaffected by administration sequence. The mean +/- SD steady-state plasma concentration (C(P)) and area under the curve (AUC)(144-168h) for CVI 5-FU (104 +/- 45 ng/mL and 2,350 +/- 826 ng x h/mL, respectively) were three-fold greater than those for oral 5-FU (38.1 +/- 7.7 ng/mL and 722 +/- 182 ng x h/mL, respectively [P <.00001]). Individual 5-FU concentrations during CVI were highly variable, whereas those after eniluracil/5-FU were very reproducible. DPD activity in PBMCs before each study period was normal., Conclusion: Both CVI 5-FU and oral eniluracil/5-FU were well tolerated, with moderate activity in these heavily pretreated patients. However, 5-FU steady-state C(P) and AUCs achieved with oral eniluracil/5-FU were significantly less than with CVI 5-FU.

Purpose: The toxicity profile of fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy given on 5 consecutive days at doses of 370 to 450 mg/m(2) has been well documented. A meta-analysis of six North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) cancer control trials involving 786 patients indicated that women treated with this type of regimen experienced more severe stomatitis and leukopenia than men. After these findings, an additional meta-analysis of the toxicity profiles on five NCCTG colorectal cancer treatment trials was undertaken., Methods: Data for 1,093 women and 1,355 men from 12 different treatment arms were included. The primary end points were the incidence of stomatitis, leukopenia, alopecia, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting, recorded with standard National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria. Fisher's exact test was used to compare incidence and severity across sexes, supplemented by Forrest meta-analysis plots and logistic regression., Results: The incidence of four out of six toxicities studied was significantly greater for women than men; the exceptions were severe nausea and vomiting. Overall, almost half of the women compared with a third of the men experienced severe toxicity (P <.0001). Logistic regression confirmed the univariate findings while adjusting for the effects of study, dose, body mass index, and age. The differences were consistent across treatment cycles. Response rates and survival distributions were the same for both sexes., Conclusion: This study confirms an earlier finding that women receiving 5-FU-based chemotherapy in a 5-day bolus schedule experience toxicity more frequently and with more severity than men. These data raise the question of whether the recommended initial dose of 5-FU-based chemotherapy for women should be lower than that for men.

Purpose: To evaluate the toxicities, characterize the pharmacokinetics, and determine the maximum-tolerated dose of bizelesin administered once every 4 weeks., Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors received escalating doses of bizelesin as an i.v. push every 4 weeks. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed with the first treatment cycle., Results: Nineteen eligible patients received a total of 54 courses of bizelesin at doses ranging from 0.1 to 1 microg/m(2). Dose-limiting toxicity of neutropenia was seen in 2 of 4 patients treated at the 1 microg/m(2) dose level. Nonhematological toxicity was generally mild with maximum toxicity being

Attention has recently been focused on medical errors as a cause of morbidity and mortality in clinical practice. Although much has been written regarding the cognitive aspects of decision making and the importance of systems management as an approach to medical error reduction, little consideration has been given to the emotional impact of errors on the practitioner. Evidence exists that errors are common in clinical practice and that physicians often deal with them in dysfunctional ways. However, there is no general acknowledgment within the profession of the inevitability of medical errors or of the need for practitioners to be trained in their management. This article focuses on the affective aspects of physician errors and presents a strategy for coping with them.

Purpose: To compare microsatellite instability (MSI) testing with immunohistochemical (IHC) detection of hMLH1 and hMSH2 in colorectal cancer., Patients and Methods: Colorectal cancers from 1,144 patients were assessed for DNA mismatch repair deficiency by two methods: MSI testing and IHC detection of hMLH1 and hMSH2 gene products. High-frequency MSI (MSI-H) was defined as more than 30% instability of at least five markers; low-level MSI (MSI-L) was defined as 1% to 29% of loci unstable., Results: Of 1,144 tumors tested, 818 showed intact expression of hMLH1 and hMSH2. Of these, 680 were microsatellite stable (MSS), 27 were MSI-H, and 111 were MSI-L. In all, 228 tumors showed absence of hMLH1 expression and 98 showed absence of hMSH2 expression: all were MSI-H., Conclusion: IHC in colorectal tumors for protein products hMLH1 and hMSH2 provides a rapid, cost-effective, sensitive (92.3%), and extremely specific (100%) method for screening for DNA mismatch repair defects. The predictive value of normal IHC for an MSS/MSI-L phenotype was 96.7%, and the predictive value of abnormal IHC was 100% for an MSI-H phenotype. Testing strategies must take into account acceptability of missing some cases of MSI-H tumors if only IHC is performed.

Although numerous studies have measured the strength of visual grouping cues for controlled psychophysical stimuli, little is known about the statistical utility of these various cues for natural images. In this study, we conducted experiments in which human participants trace perceived contours in natural images. These contours are automatically mapped to sequences of discrete tangent elements detected in the image. By examining relational properties between pairs of successive tangents on these traced curves, and between randomly selected pairs of tangents, we are able to estimate the likelihood distributions required to construct an optimal Bayesian model for contour grouping. We employed this novel methodology to investigate the inferential power of three classical Gestalt cues for contour grouping: proximity, good continuation, and luminance similarity. The study yielded a number of important results: (1) these cues, when appropriately defined, are approximately uncorrelated, suggesting a simple factorial model for statistical inference; (2) moderate image-to-image variation of the statistics indicates the utility of general probabilistic models for perceptual organization; (3) these cues differ greatly in their inferential power, proximity being by far the most powerful; and (4) statistical modeling of the proximity cue indicates a scale-invariant power law in close agreement with prior psychophysics.

Background: Bile-duct and gallbladder carcinomas are rare cancers. Once they have spread beyond the point of surgical resectability, no therapies have shown meaningful long-term benefit. These cancers are typically refractory to standard chemotherapy agents. Based on preclinical work showing activity of CPT-11, we performed a phase II trial to assess its activity in patients with bile-duct or gallbladder carcinomas., Methods: Patients with histologic or cytologic evidence of locally advanced or metastatic bile-duct or gallbladder carcinoma were potentially eligible for this study. Patients meeting study eligibility and who signed an informed consent were given CPT-11 125 mg/m2 weekly for 4 wk followed by a 2-wk break from therapy. The starting dose of CPT-11 was later reduced to 100 mg/m2 grade IV toxicity. Patients continued on treatment if they showed evidence of benefit and tolerated therapy., Results: A total of 39 patients were enrolled, and 36 were evaluable. The overall confirmed response rate was 8%. One CR and two PRs were seen. A high frequency of toxicity was seen. However, no unusual or unexpected toxicities occurred., Conclusion: CPT-11 is ineffective therapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic bile-duct or gallbladder carcinoma.

Purpose: The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the esophagus, esophagogastric junction, and gastric cardia has been rising in the face of limited treatment options for patients with metastatic disease. With the emergence of data to suggest that single agent docetaxel and irinotecan carry antineoplastic effects in this setting, we determined the response rate of these agents when given in combination., Patients and Methods: Forty-six patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the esophagus, esophagogastric junction, and gastric cardia were evaluated. Patients received docetaxel 50 mg/m2/d and irinotecan 130 mg/m2/d intravenously at 21-d intervals with a tumor assessment after 2 cycles. Because of unacceptable toxicity among the first 13 patients, dosing was reduced to docetaxel 40 mg/m2/d and irinotecan 100 mg/m2/d intravenously at 21-d intervals., Results: The response rate for the entire cohort was 26% (95% confidence interval: 14%, 41%) with 12 confirmed partial responses. Five of these 12 responses were observed in patients treated at the higher chemotherapy dose. However, because 8 of 13 patients suffered grade 4 neutropenia and fevers, a dose reduction was incorporated into the protocol, and the remainder of the cohort was treated at the lower dose. All except 4 of the 15 observed grade 4 toxicities occurred at the higher dose, and these toxicities included nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, hypotension, dysrhythmias, and diarrhea in addition to neutropenia and fevers. There were no grade 5 toxicities. The median survival for the entire cohort was 7.3 mo., Conclusion: The combination of docetaxel and irinotecan provides modest antineoplastic activity among patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, esophagogastric junction, and gastric cardia. Doses of docetaxel 40 mg/m2/d and irinotecan 100 mg/m2/d at 21-d intervals provide an acceptable safety profile, but higher doses appear to result in unacceptable toxicity.

Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy is standard treatment for patients with resected colon cancer who are at high risk for recurrence, but the efficacy and toxicity of such treatment in patients more than 70 years of age are controversial., Methods: We performed a pooled analysis, based on the intention to treat, of individual patient data from seven phase 3 randomized trials (involving 3351 patients) in which the effects of postoperative fluorouracil plus leucovorin (five trials) or fluorouracil plus levamisole (two trials) were compared with the effects of surgery alone in patients with stage II or III colon cancer. The patients were grouped into four age categories of equal size, and analyses were repeated with 10-year age ranges (< or =50, 51 to 60, 61 to 70, and >70 years), with the same conclusions. The toxic effects measured in all trials were nausea or vomiting, diarrhea, stomatitis, and leukopenia. Patients in the fluorouracil-plus-leucovorin and fluorouracil-plus-levamisole groups were combined for the efficacy analysis but kept separate for toxicity analyses., Results: Adjuvant treatment had a significant positive effect on both overall survival and time to tumor recurrence (P<0.001 for each, with hazard ratios of death and recurrence of 0.76 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.68 to 0.85] and 0.68 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.76], respectively). The five-year overall survival was 71 percent for those who received adjuvant therapy, as compared with 64 percent for those untreated. No significant interaction was observed between age and the efficacy of treatment. The incidence of toxic effects was not increased among the elderly (age >70 years), except for leukopenia in one study., Conclusions: Selected elderly patients with colon cancer can receive the same benefit from fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy as their younger counterparts, without a significant increase in toxic effects.

Background: Our previous studies have shown that the in vitro cytotoxicity of gemcitabine and SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan (CPT-11), is synergistic in human tumor cell lines., Patients and Methods: Twenty-four patients with solid tumors, refractory to standard chemotherapy or for whom no effective therapy existed (age range 31-74; 7 female, 17 male; ECOG PS 0 = 12, 1 = 11, 2 = 1), received gemcitabine and CPT-11 weekly for four weeks out of every six weeks. Fifty courses of treatment (median 2, range 1-8) were given through five dose levels of gemcitabine/CPT-11 (600/75, 800/75, 800/100, 1000/100, 1000/125 mg/m2)., Results: Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in eight and two patients, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in one and three patients, respectively. Hematologic toxicity resulted in > or = 2 missed doses of treatment in two out of six patients and was therefore dose limiting at gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and CPT-11 125 mg/m2. Grade 3 and 4 diarrhea occurred in two and one patients, respectively. Other moderate non-hematologic toxicities included alopecia, anorexia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and weight loss., Conclusions: The maximum tolerated dose for this study recommended for phase II testing is gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and CPT-11 100 mg/m2. A partial response was seen in transitional cell carcinoma.

The goal of a screening trial is to examine several treatments with the intention of selecting one or more treatment(s) for further testing. Such a trial frequently occurs in the phase II setting, with the intention that the selected treatment be formally compared to a standard treatment in a phase III clinical trial. In this framework it is not essential that the very best treatment is definitely selected (such a decision would require a formal phase III trial), rather it is important that a substantially inferior treatment is not selected when a superior treatment exists. The level of evidence required to select a treatment based on this standard is lower than the evidence required to definitively order treatments. This paper introduces a flexible design for such trials, the flexibility coming from the use of a particular decision rule. The proposed rule states that if the observed difference in the success rates of the treatments is larger than some prespecified quantity d, then the treatment with the highest observed success rate is selected. However, if the observed difference is less than or equal to d, other factors may be considered in the selection. The goal of this design is to mirror clinical practice, where a treatment's success probability is often only one of many considerations in determining a treatment recommendation for a particular patient., (Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

The goal of a phase II trial is to make a preliminary determination regarding the activity and tolerability of a new treatment and thus to determine whether the treatment warrants further study in the phase III setting. Phase II clinical trials are typically designed in the hypothesis testing framework with two possible outcomes, either reject the null hypothesis H(0) or reject the alternative hypothesis H(a), based on the observed activity level. However, in cases where the observed activity is "borderline," the decision regarding the future of the agent is not as clear as the prespecified hypothesis test would indicate. In this paper we propose an alternative design that allows for three outcomes: reject H(0), reject H(a), or reject neither. We describe the theoretical properties of this design and illustrate it with several examples. We focus on the clinical implications of the three-outcome design. Control Clin Trials 2001;22:117-125

The current recommendation for adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed stage III colon cancer involves 6 months of fluorouracil (5-FU) plus low- or high-dose leucovorin. In clinical trials performed throughout the world, several drugs have demonstrated either improved toxicity profiles or antitumor activity for patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. Uracil and tegafur (UFT) and capecitabine (Xeloda) are two examples of new oral chemotherapy compounds with acceptable side-effect profiles in early adjuvant or advanced disease trials. Irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar) and oxaliplatin, when administered intravenously in combination with a 5-FU regimen, have both demonstrated significant antitumor effects for patients with advanced-stage disease. Other immunotherapies, including monoclonal antibodies and cancer vaccines, are being evaluated to help stimulate immune responses in patients with resected colon cancer. These agents are just a few examples of the new compounds being tested in the next generation of clinical trials for resected stage III colon cancer. Future and ongoing investigations will look to integrate these new therapies as we attempt to move beyond the era of 5-FU and leucovorin.

Colon cancer remains the third most common cancer, and cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Greater public awareness and acceptance of screening programs have contributed significantly to increasingly earlier detection of colon cancer and decreased mortality. Advances made in the understanding of this disease, both in terms of its clinical behavior and molecular pathogenesis, have translated into major improvements in its therapy. Several large randomized trials during the last two decades have helped the oncology community forge a successful multi-modality treatment strategy against colon cancer. These studies have defined the role of adjuvant therapy for colon cancer after curative surgery. Despite all the advances, a large number of patients continue to succumb to this disease, and the search for better therapies is still necessary. In this article, we discuss the evolution and the current state of adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer and briefly review new developments.

Background: Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are involved in tumor invasion and metastasis and have been implicated in breast, ovarian, colorectal, and lung cancer growth. We undertook a phase I study of BAY 12-9566, an inhibitor of MMP-2, MMP-9, and MMP-3, in patients with solid tumors to determine its safety, pharmacokinetics, and effects on potential surrogate markers of biologic activity., Patients and Methods: BAY 12-9566 was orally administered daily at four dose levels; 400 mg daily, 400 mg b.i.d., 400 mg t.i.d., and 800 mg b.i.d. Drug disposition was determined on days 1 and 29 with weekly trough levels measured during the first four weeks. Plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and urinary pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline crosslinks were determined at baseline, once weekly for four weeks, and then every four weeks., Results: Thirteen patients were entered on trial. BAY 12-9566 was well tolerated, with only one grade 3 headache, one grade 3 anemia, one grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and no musculoskeletal effects. The median treatment duration was 57 days (range 7-560). Mean trough levels of BAY 12-9566 on day 28 ranged from 80.5 to 108.6 mg/l. Plasma trough levels were 1500-42,000-fold above the Ki's for MMP-2, MMP-3, and MMP-9 at the 800 mg p.o. b.i.d. dose level. There was no significant change in VEGF, bFGF, pyridinoline, and deoxypyridinoline crosslinks with BAY 12-9566 administration., Conclusions: The recommended dose for further testing is 800 mg p.o. b.i.d.

Background: Topoisomerase I inhibitors have demonstrated clinical activity in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. The authors performed a Phase II study to evaluate the objective tumor response rate of 2 different doses and schedules of 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC) in previously untreated patients with measurable recurrent metastatic colorectal carcinoma., Methods: Fifty-one patients were registered. One schedule evaluated 9-AC given at 1100 microgram/m(2)/24 hours by continuous infusion for 72 hours along with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor at 5 microgram/kg/day on Days 5 through 12. Another schedule involved 9-AC at 480 microgram/m(2)/24 hours by continuous infusion for 120 hours on Days 1, 8, and 15 given every 4 weeks., Results: Forty-eight of 51 patients (94%) were evaluable (28 patients who received 72-hour infusion and 20 patients who received 120-hour infusion) for response and toxicity. Significant hematologic toxicities were encountered, especially with the 72-hour infusion schedule, in which 43% (12 of 28) and 28% (8 of 28) experienced Grade 4 (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively. Grade 4 neutropenia was encountered in 61% (17 of 28) and 11% (2 of 19) of patients on the 72-hour and 120-hour infusion schedules, respectively. Diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and hepatotoxicity were troublesome nonhematologic toxicities. Seventy-nine percent (11 of 14) and 57% (4 of 7) of the patients experiencing Grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity were on the 72-hour infusion schedule. Three patients died of chemotherapy-related toxicity. One response was observed in 48 evaluable patients (2%)., Conclusions: 9-AC did not demonstrate sufficient antitumor activity and had unacceptable toxicity in previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma., (Copyright 2000 American Cancer Society.)

At present there remains a need for more effective systemic therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer. Some studies have suggested that infusional chemotherapy schedules and biomodulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may improve the therapeutic outcome in advanced colon cancer. One such regimen that uses continuous infusion 5-FU, weekly leucovorin, daily dipyridamole, and intermittent mitomycin-C has activity in both colon and unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. The intent of this trial was to test the effectiveness of this four-drug regimen in advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients received 5-FU 200 mg/m2 daily by continuous infusion, leucovorin 30 mg/m2 IV weekly, mitomycin-C 10 mg/m2 day 1, and dipyridamole 75 mg orally four times daily for 5 weeks. After a 1-week break, treatment cycles were repeated every 6 weeks. Eligibility included biopsy-proven advanced measurable pancreatic cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 and 2, and no prior systemic chemotherapy. Of 46 evaluable patients, 9 partial responses and 1 complete tumor response were seen, for an overall response rate of 22% (95% confidence interval 11-36%). The median survival in the group of 50 patients registered to this trial was 4.6 months, with a range of 0.33 to 40.2 months. Toxicity was manageable, with the most common toxicities (> or =grade III National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) being anorexia (13%), stomatitis (17%), and hand-foot syndrome (13%). Of note, little severe hematologic toxicity and no significant headaches were reported. Although some patients did respond, the therapeutic results are not encouraging enough to take this regimen to phase III testing.

A Phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, and pharmacokinetic profile of irinotecan (CPT-11) and its active metabolites when given on a once-every-3-week schedule. Thirty-four patients with advanced refractory solid malignancies were treated with CPT-11 (240-340 mg/m2) administered as a 90-min i.v. infusion every 3 weeks. Patients were divided into two groups: those with and those without prior abdominal/pelvic (AP) radiotherapy. Gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea) and hematological toxicity (leukopenia and neutropenia) were dose-limiting side effects. Other common toxicities included anorexia, asthenia, and acute cholinergic symptoms (abdominal cramps, diaphoresis, and lacrimation). For patients with no prior AP radiation therapy, the MTD was determined to be 320 mg/m2, whereas those with prior AP radiation therapy had a MTD of 290 mg/m2. Dose-proportional increases in the mean area under the concentration-time curves for CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38G were not observed over the narrow dose range studied. Mean values of terminal phase half-life, clearance, terminal phase volume of distribution, and steady-state volume of distribution for CPT-11 were 12.4 +/- 1.8 h, 13.0 +/- 3.8 liters/h/m2, 234 +/- 83 liters/m2, and 123 +/- 38 liters/m2, respectively. The pharmacodynamic analyses indicated the strongest correlation to be between SN-38 area under the concentration-time curves and neutropenia (p = 0.60; P = 0.001). A total of five responses (one complete response and four partial responses) were observed in the cohort of 32 patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal carcinoma. In conclusion, gastrointestinal toxicity and hematological toxicity were the dose-limiting toxicities of CPT-11 when administered as a 90-min infusion every 3 weeks. In this trial, the recommended Phase II starting dose for patients with no prior AP radiation therapy was found to be 320 mg/m2; for patients with prior AP radiation, the recommended Phase II starting dose was 290 mg/m2. This once-every-3-week schedule has been incorporated into a Phase I trial of CPT-11 combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin.

Purpose: Multitargeted antifolate (MTA) is an investigational agent that, like gemcitabine, exhibits broad activity in solid tumors. A phase I trial of MTA and gemcitabine was undertaken, based on the demonstration of preclinical cytotoxic synergy., Patients and Methods: Thirty-five patients (group I) received 164 courses (median, four; range, one to 14 courses) of treatment of gemcitabine at doses of 1,000 and 1,250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and MTA at doses of 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 mg/m(2), given 90 minutes after gemcitabine on day 1. Courses were repeated every 3 weeks. Because the day 8 dose of gemcitabine was reduced or omitted in 57% of courses due to neutropenia, 21 patients (group II) were treated on an alternate schedule, with MTA administered on day 8 rather than day 1. This group received 85 treatment courses (median, four; range, one to 10 courses)., Results: The most common and dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. Other toxicities included nausea, fatigue, rash, and elevated hepatic transaminases. The maximum-tolerated dose was gemcitabine/MTA 1,000/500 mg/m(2) for group I and 1,250/500 mg/m(2) for group II. Thirteen objective responses were documented (colorectal cancer, n = 3; non-small-cell lung cancer, n = 3; cholangiocarcinoma, n = 2; ovarian carcinoma, n = 2; mesothelioma, n = 1; breast cancer, n = 1; and adenocarcinoma of unknown primary site, n = 1). Gemcitabine had no effect on the disposition of MTA., Conclusion: The gemcitabine/MTA combination is broadly active and warrants further evaluation. The sequence of gemcitabine administered on days 1 and 8 with MTA administered on day 8 is better tolerated and is recommended for further study at doses of gemcitabine/MTA 1,250/500 mg/m(2).

Purpose: The goals of this study were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and describe the toxicities of the combination of irinotecan and docetaxel administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced malignancies and, also, to evaluate the effect of irinotecan on the disposition of docetaxel and describe preliminary evidence of antitumor activity., Patients and Methods: Eighteen patients received 85 courses (median, two courses; range, one to 15 courses) of treatment with irinotecan, administered over 90 minutes by intravenous infusion, followed by docetaxel, administered over 60 minutes by intravenous infusion. Four escalating dose levels of irinotecan/docetaxel (160/50 mg/m(2), 160/65 mg/m(2), 200/65 mg/m(2), and 200/75 mg/m(2)) were studied. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of irinotecan on the disposition of docetaxel., Results: The most common and dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, which consisted of neutropenia that was severe (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria [NCI CTC] grade 4) but brief (< 5 days) in 11 patients, with three episodes of febrile neutropenia. Nonhematologic toxicities of anorexia, nausea, and stomatitis were mild to moderate (NCI CTC grades 1 and 2), but there was one incidence each of both CTC grade 3 anorexia and nausea. All patients had total alopecia. Diarrhea was dose-dependent and severe in four patients who failed to take adequate antidiarrhea therapy. Five out of 16 assessable patients, one with cholangiocarcinoma, one with leiomyosarcoma, and three with non-small-cell lung cancer, achieved partial remissions., Conclusion: The combination of irinotecan and docetaxel causes significant reversible myelosuppression, which was dose limiting but led to no serious sequelae. There was no evidence of a clinically significant interaction using these two agents in this sequence. The combination showed antitumor activity at all the dose levels tested and should be further studied in a number of tumor types. The recommended phase II dose on this schedule is irinotecan 160 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 65 mg/m(2).

Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI) and allelic imbalance involving chromosome arms 5q, 8p, 17p, and 18q are genetic alterations commonly found in colorectal cancer. We investigated whether the presence or absence of these genetic alterations would allow stratification of patients with Astler-Coller stage B2 or C colorectal cancer into favorable and unfavorable prognostic groups., Methods: Tumors from 508 patients were evaluated for MSI and allelic imbalance by use of 11 microsatellite markers located on chromosome arms 5q, 8p, 15q, 17p, and 18q. Genetic alterations involving each of these markers were examined for associations with survival and disease recurrence. All P values are two-sided., Results: In univariate analyses, high MSI (MSI-H), i.e., MSI at 30% or more of the loci examined, was associated with improved survival (P =.02) and time to recurrence (P =.01). The group of patients whose tumors exhibited allelic imbalance at chromosome 8p had decreased survival (P =.02) and time to recurrence (P =.004). No statistically significant associations with survival or time to recurrence were observed for markers on chromosome arms 5q, 15q, 17p, or 18q. In multivariate analyses, MSI-H was an independent predictor of improved survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.31-0.82; P =.006) and time to recurrence (HR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.24-0.74; P =.003), and 8p allelic imbalance was an independent predictor of decreased survival (HR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.25-2.83; P =. 002) and time to recurrence (HR = 2.07; 95% CI = 1.32-3.25; P =.002)., Conclusions: Patients whose tumors exhibited MSI-H had a favorable prognosis, whereas those with 8p allelic imbalance had a poor prognosis; both alterations served as independent prognostic factors. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an association between 8p allelic imbalance and survival in patients with colorectal cancer.

Dolastatin-10 (dola-10) is a potent antimitotic peptide, isolated from the marine mollusk Dolabela auricularia, that inhibits tubulin polymerization. Preclinical studies of dola-10 have demonstrated activity against a variety of murine and human tumors in cell cultures and mice models. The purpose of this Phase I clinical trial was to characterize the maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics, and biological effects of dola-10 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Escalating doses of dola-10 were administered as an i.v. bolus every 21 days, using a modified Fibonacci dose escalation schema. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed with the first treatment cycle. Neurological testing was performed on each patient prior to treatment with dola-10, at 6 weeks and at study termination. Thirty eligible patients received a total of 94 cycles (median, 2 cycles; maximum, 14 cycles) of dola-10 at doses ranging from 65 to 455 microg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicity of granulocytopenia was seen at 455 microg/m2 for minimally pretreated patients (two or fewer prior chemotherapy regimens) and 325 microg/m2 for heavily pretreated patients (more than two prior chemotherapy regimens). Nonhematological toxicity was generally mild. Local irritation at the drug injection site was mild and not dose dependent. Nine patients developed new or increased symptoms of mild peripheral sensory neuropathy that was not dose limiting. This toxicity was more frequent in patients with preexisting peripheral neuropathies. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated a rapid drug distribution with a prolonged plasma elimination phase (t 1/2z = 320 min). The area under the concentration-time curve increased in proportion to administered dose, whereas the clearance remained constant over the doses studied. Correlation analysis demonstrated a strong relationship between dola-10 area under the concentration-time curve values and decrease from baseline for leukocyte counts. In conclusion, dola-10 administered every 3 weeks as a peripheral i.v. bolus is well tolerated with dose-limiting toxicity of granulocytopenia. The maximum tolerated dose (and recommended Phase II starting dose) is 400 microg/m2 for patients with minimal prior treatment (two or fewer prior chemotherapy regimens) and 325 microg/m2 for patients who are heavily pretreated (more than two prior chemotherapy regimens).

Salvage treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with or without leucovorin may induce responses in patients with advanced colorectal cancer whose disease progresses after adjuvant therapy with the same drugs. Similarly, restarting a regimen containing 5-FU can be beneficial in patients with advanced disease who had previously responded to the therapy or experienced disease stabilization but whose treatment was interrupted. Administering 5-FU by continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion may result in a tumor response after disease progression on bolus 5-FU i.v. injection. Adding the platinum compound oxaliplatin to 5-FU and leucovorin may provide synergistic antineoplastic activity, even in patients with disease refractory to 5-FU. Chronomodulation of therapy decreases toxicity and increases dose intensity, response rate, and possibly survival time in some studies. Hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapeutic agents is not routinely recommended in patients who have metastases limited to the liver and whose disease has failed to respond to prior 5-FU because of the associated costs and complications and the lack of data supporting the use of this approach after disease progression on i.v. 5-FU. A multicenter phase III trial has been completed in which patients whose colorectal cancer had progressed after first-line treatment with 5-FU were randomized to receive irinotecan 300 to 350 mg/m2 every 3 weeks or infusional 5-FU with or without leucovorin (Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 17:256A, 1998 [abstr 984]). The 5-FU was administered according to investigator choice as a 24-hour, 48-hour, or continuous infusion. The results of this trial, which have been submitted for publication, should help to clarify the relative value of re-treatment with a 5-FU-containing regimen versus use of irinotecan in patients with disease progression after first-line 5-FU.

The duocarmycins represent a new group of antitumor antibiotics produced by Streptomyces that bind to the minor groove of DNA. KW-2189 is a water-soluble semisynthetic derivative of duocarmycin B2, with significant activity in murine and human tumor models. We conducted a Phase I trial of KW-2189 in patients who had solid tumors that were refractory to standard chemotherapy or for whom no more effective therapy existed. KW-2189 was administered as a rapid i.v. bolus daily for 5 days every 6 weeks. Twenty-two patients were enrolled and received a total of 31 cycles of KW-2189. Leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were the dose-limiting toxicities, with nadirs occurring at medians of 36, 38, and 29 days, respectively, at the 0.04 mg/m2/day dose level. Nonhematological toxicities were mild, although one patient developed grade 3 fatigue. Four patients had stable disease over two to four cycles of treatment and showed no cumulative toxicity. The mean t1/2, plasma clearance, and steady-state volume of distribution were 13.5 min, 1,287 ml/min/m2, and 10,638 ml/m2, respectively. Pharmacokinetics were similar on days 1 and 5, with no drug accumulation in plasma. The active metabolite DU-86 was not consistently found in patient plasma. For Phase II trials, when the 5 days every 6 weeks schedule was used, 0.04 mg/m2/day KW-2189 appears to be the maximal tolerated dose, especially for patients who have received prior chemotherapy. At this dose level, the drug was well tolerated, and the toxicities were acceptable.

But fluorouracil (5-FU) and irinotecan (CPT-11 [Camptosar]) have shown activity in metastatic colorectal cancer and are approved for its treatment in the United States. Preclinical experiments in cell cultures and human tumor xenografts have indicated potential synergy when irinotecan is combined with 5-FU and leucovorin. The synergy appears to be sequence-dependent and is optimal when irinotecan exposure precedes 5-FU exposure by at least 24 hours. Four North American trials have been reported in which the three drugs were used together in either simultaneous, sequential, or alternating schedules. All three schedules showed activity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The concern that diarrhea, which can be a dose-limiting toxicity with both irinotecan and 5-FU, would prevent the two drugs from being combined in reasonable doses has not proven to be a clinical issue. Phase III trials comparing the combination of the three drugs in a variety of schedules against 5-FU plus leucovorin alone are currently under way or in the planning stages.

Background: Follow-up testing after surgery for colon cancer is recommended principally to identify resectable recurrences, but data on the efficacy of, outcomes of, and optimal strategies for this testing are limited., Objectives: To determine the relation between follow-up tests and salvage surgery, assess outcomes, and document surgical mortality., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: A North American multi-institutional trial comparing postoperative chemotherapy plus follow-up with follow-up alone., Patients: 1247 patients with resected stage II and stage III colon cancer., Intervention: The protocol mandated follow-up testing that could be supplemented at the discretion of treating physicians. Indications of recurrent disease were documented., Measurements: Recurrence, resectable recurrence, surgical mortality, and survival were studied., Results: 548 patients had recurrence of colon cancer. Salvage surgery was attempted in 222 patients (41%). In 109 patients (20%), curative-intent surgery was done for hepatic recurrence (28 patients), pulmonary metastasis (20 patients), local recurrence (24 patients), or recurrence at other sites (37 patients). Most curative-intent surgical procedures were motivated by follow-up testing (36 patients), elevated carcinoembryonic antigen level (41 patients), or symptoms (27 patients). The median follow-up time after curative-intent surgery exceeded 5 years; the estimated 5-year disease-free survival rate was 23%. A solitary lesion was a favorable prognostic factor. The surgical mortality rate was 2%. Curative-intent resections were done in 15 patients with second primary colorectal cancer; 12 of these patients have survived disease-free., Conclusions: Second operations for colon cancer that are triggered by follow-up testing or symptoms are common and can result in long-term disease-free survival.

The prognostic significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in colorectal carcinoma is uncertain. We analyzed 289 moderately differentiated (grades II and Ill) colorectal carcinomas for neuroendocrine differentiation by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. The tumors were divided into three groups based on the presence of and the numbers of neuroendocrine cells, with group I having no neuroendocrine cells, group II having <1 positive cell/mm(2), and group Ill with >1 positive cell/mm(2). In situ hybridization with probes for chromogranin A and B detected almost twice as many neuroendocrine cells as did immunostaining with an antibody for chromogranin A. There was no prognostic difference associated with the presence or absence of neuroendocrine differentiation in this group of moderately differentiated carcinomas. These results indicate that the presence of neuroendocrine cells detected by expression of chromogranin protein or mRNA does not influence prognosis in moderately differentiated colorectal carcinomas.

Fazarabine (1-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl-5-aza-cytosine, or Ara-AC) is a nucleoside analogue that consists of the arabinoside ring of 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine and the pyrimidine base of 5-azacytidine. In Phase I and Phase II trials, neutropenia was dose limiting, with minimal nonhematological toxicity. The in vitro cytotoxic concentrations of Ara-AC could not be achieved in these studies; neutropenia precluded dose escalation. The objectives of this study were: to determine either the maximum tolerated dose of Ara-AC or to safely achieve target plasma levels of 2-5 microgram/ml when Ara-AC was administered as a 24-h infusion with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to patients with advanced refractory malignancies; to characterize the pharmacokinetic behavior of Ara-AC with G-CSF; and to define the relationship of Ara-AC pharmacokinetics to toxicity. Twenty-four patients received 67 courses of Ara-AC at doses of 54-112 mg/m2/h. Dose-limiting toxicity was approached but not reached. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and nausea were the principle side effects. Steady-state plasma concentrations exceeded the minimum target concentration of 2 microgram/ml in all patients who received >/=78 mg/m2/h for 24 h. The maximum target concentration was approached during administration of 112 mg/m2/h for 24 h. The mean steady-state clearance was 475 +/- 103 ml/min/m2 and did not change with dose. One partial response was seen. One patient received 16 courses and another received 7 courses of therapy before progression. Ara-AC can be safely administered in doses that result in plasma concentrations of 2-5 microgram/ml, if it is given with G-CSF. Phase II trials of Ara-AC in selected malignancies are planned.