Search

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a combination of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and irinotecan (FOLFIRI 1) administered every 2 weeks in a population of elderly subjects with advanced colorectal cancer., Patients and Methods: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer included in this study were aged at least 70 years, with a performance status of 0/1, without geriatric syndrome and without previous palliative chemotherapy. They received irinotecan [180 mg/m(2) intravenous (iv) infusion over 90 min] followed by folinic acid (400 mg/m(2) iv over 2 h), then 5FU (400 mg/m(2) iv bolus) and 5FU (2,400 mg/m(2) continuous iv infusion for 46 h) every 2 weeks., Results: Forty eligible patients were included. The median age was 77.3 years (range 70-84.7). The objective response rate was 40% and the stabilisation rate was 45%. Median progression-free survival was 8 months, overall survival was 17.2 months and cancer-related specific survival was 20.2 months. In total, 300 cycles of chemotherapy were administered with a median number of eight cycles per patient (range 1-18). Tolerance was good; grade 3/4 toxicities included diarrhoea (15%), asthenia (15%), nausea/vomiting (7.5%) and neutropenia (7.5%). One toxic death was observed due to grade 4 diarrhoea., Conclusion: The FOLFIRI 1 regimen is a valid therapeutic option for elderly patients in good clinical condition.

Background: EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) gene gain assessed by FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) has been shown to be predictive of response to EGFR-targeted therapies in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The aim or our study was to relate the EGFR gene copy number to therapeutic results in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with a cetuximab-containing regimen., Methods: Forty-seven patients with metastatic CRC treated with a cetuximab-containing regimen between August 2004 and September 2006 were included in our study. EGFR status was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and by FISH on fixed paraffin-embedded sections of tumor specimens., Results: By IHC (n = 47), 39 patients (83%) had EGFR-positive tumors. EGFR gene copy gain was detected in 8 (19.5%) of 41 tumors. Neither EGFR expression assessed by IHC nor EGFR gene copy gain assessed by FISH were statistically significantly correlated with objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Of the 33 patients whose tumors were FISH negative, 8 patients (24.2%) had a partial response, and 10 (30.3%) had stable disease., Conclusions: EGFR FISH analysis does not seem to be a sufficiently robust test for selecting candidate CRC patients for cetuximab therapy.

Background and Objective: Tegafur is an oral fluorouracil prodrug used in the treatment of colorectal cancer. The aim of this phase II, crossover, bioequivalence study was to compare the pharmacokinetics (primary objective) and tolerability (secondary objective) of tegafur-uracil (UFT) given as three daily doses (tid, reference schedule) with those obtained using a more convenient schedule of two daily doses (bid, new schedule)., Patient and Methods: Twenty-one patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (median age 63 years) received the same oral daily dose of UFT (300 mg/m(2)/day) plus leucovorin (90 mg/day) divided into two or three daily doses. Patients were randomised to receive the first cycle either tid (12 patients) or bid (9 patients). The eligibility criteria included an Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group performance status of < or =1 and adequate bone-marrow, hepatic and renal function. The pharmacokinetics of uracil, fluorouracil and tegafur (high-performance liquid chromatography assays) were evaluated at steady state over 24 hours (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours [AUC(24)], minimum plasma concentration [C(min)] and maximum plasma concentration [C(max)]). The pharmacokinetic parameters were analysed after logarithmic transformation according to a general linear model., Results: The AUC(24)values of fluorouracil (p < 0.0001), uracil (p < 0.0001) and tegafur (p = 0.058) were greater with the bid schedule than the tid schedule. The bid : tid AUC(24) ratio (90% CI) was 1.8 (1.55, 2.10) with fluorouracil, 2.0 (1.59, 2.57) with uracil and 1.2 (1.02, 1.36) with tegafur, indicating that the bid and tid schedules were not bioequivalent. No major toxicity (grade 4) was reported, and grade 3 adverse events accounted for 9% of the total adverse events. Intra-patient comparison of the maximum toxicity grade did not demonstrate a significant difference between the bid and tid schedules (p = 0.18)., Conclusion: A 2-fold increase in the fluorouracil and uracil AUC values was observed with UFT administered bid compared with tid, without a significant impact on tolerability, suggesting that the more convenient bid schedule may improve the UFT therapeutic index.

Background: The objective of this phase III study was to compare the safety and efficacy of FLP (modulation of 5-FU (Fluorouracil) by folinic acid or leucovorin (LV) and cisplatin vs. FP (5-FU combined with Cisplatin) as a first line chemotherapy in advanced oesophageal, gastric and pancreatic cancer., Patients and Methods: 232 patients with measurable lesions were randomised to receive at the first cycle either FP (arm A: 5-FU 800 mg/m2/d in continuous infusion 5 days and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 or 2), or FLP (arm B: LV, 100 mg/m2/d in bolus 5 days, followed by 5-FU 350 mg/m2/d in 1 h infusion 5 days and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 or 2). In case of no grade 3-4 haematological and diarrhoea toxicity, the dose of 5-FU was increased to 1000 mg/m2/d and 400 mg/m2/d in the two arms respectively, for the subsequent cycles until disease progression., Results: The distribution of primary tumours was: 19 squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus, 19 oesophageal adenocarcinoma, 91 gastric and 97 pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Safety remained acceptable and comparable in the two arms except for the severe grade 3-4 mucositis, which was lower in arm B (4.5 vs. 16.4%, p < 0.009). Efficacy in terms of tumour response and survival was similar in the two arms, showing an objective response rate (after external review) of 18.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 11.4-25.8%) in arm A vs. 15% (95% CI 8.5-21.6%) in arm B, an overall median survival of 24 weeks in arm A vs. 24.7 in arm B (p = 0.83) and a progression-free median survival of 12.4 weeks vs. 12.1 in arms A and B, respectively (p = 0.91)., Conclusion: The FLP regimen is substantially equivalent to FP in terms of safety and quality of life, as well as for antitumour efficacy in these carcinomas; the only slight advantage of FLP in this study concerns mucositis. Based on these results, FLP could be used as an alternative to FP when appropriate.

Local control and sphincter preservation are the two challenges of anal canal cancer treatment. These tumors are radio- and chemo-sensitive and treatment moved from surgical approach, with abdominoperineal resection, to definitive radiation therapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy. Randomised trials proved the benefit of combined modality with chemoradiotherapy and of mitomycine C (MMC) compared with radiotherapy alone, with a toxic death rate of about 2%. Indications of chemoradiotherapy are locally advanced tumor T2 > or = 4 cm, T3-4 or N1-3 but the best modalities of combined treatment are still under debate. Standard chemotherapy is 5 flurouracile (5FU) + MMC, but cisplatinum (CDDP) is an effective and well tolerated substitute for MMC. Favourable results with CDDP-containing regimen in term of toxicity and carcinologic control have been reported in phase II and retrospective studies. Total radiation dose, overall duration of radiation therapy, duration of the gap and indications of additional boost are not clear, but it is demonstrated that overall duration of treatment should be as short as possible to improve the therapeutic radio. Phase II and III studies are ongoing, to evaluate the best chemotherapy regimen between 5FU+MMC and 5FU+CDDP, the benefit of neoadjuvant or maintenance chemotherapy and the interest of increased total dose. Next future could be the utilisation of oral 5FU. This article is a review of past randomised trials, phases II and retrospective study on radiochemotherapy of anal canal carcinoma.

Purpose: To evaluate response rate and toxicity of irinotecan and oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (Folfirinox) in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (APA)., Patients and Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically proven APA and bidimensionally measurable disease were treated with Folfirinox therapy every 2 weeks, which comprised oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) plus leucovorin 400 mg/m(2) followed by bolus FU 400 mg/m(2) on day 1, then FU 2,400 mg/m(2) as a 46-hour continuous infusion. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)., Results: Forty-seven patients were entered, and 46 received treatment. Thirty-five patients (76%) had metastatic disease. A total of 356 cycles were delivered, with a median of eight cycles per patient (range, one to 24 cycles). All patients were assessable for safety. No toxic death occurred. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia occurred in 52% of patients, including two patients with febrile neutropenia. Other relevant toxicities included grade 3 to 4 nausea (20%), vomiting (17%), and diarrhea (17%) and grade 3 neuropathy (15%; Levi's scale). The confirmed response rate was 26% (95% CI, 13% to 39%), including 4% complete responses. Median time to progression was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 11.6 months), and median overall survival was 10.2 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 14.4 months). Between baseline and end of treatment, patients had improvement in all functional scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30, except cognitive functioning. Responders had major improvement in global QOL., Conclusion: With a good safety profile, a promising response rate, and an improvement in QOL, Folfirinox will be further assessed in a phase III trial.

Treatment of non operable esophageal cancer still remains debatable. To date, radio-chemotherapy treatment could be considered as a standard, offers to the patients real hope and a new area of management in this unfavourable cancer. The aim of the present study was to report retrospectively a 10 year experience in concomitant radio-chemotherapy primary treatment in non operable esophageal cancer patients in Antoine Lacassagne anti cancer Center. Between January 1989 and June 1997, 63 consecutive, previously untreated patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and who were inoperable for various reasons were majoritably treated with cisplatin (70 mg/m2) at J1 plus 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m2/d) from J1 to J5 every 3 weeks (78% of patients) concomitantly with external beam radiotherapy (2 types). Two other chemotherapy regimens has been also used. Seventy-five percent (47/63) of the patients received the stipuled concomitant radio-chemotherapy dose. Neutropenia in the form of WHO grade 3-4 : 27% (17/63) was observed, grade 3-4 anemia and thrombopenia in 16 (26 %) and in 9 (15%) patients, respectively, grade 3-4 emesis in 6 % (4/63), grade 3-4 mucositis in 10 % (6/63). On 47 patients with accessible responder status, 18 of them presented a complete response, 20 a partial response, 6 a stable disease and 3 a progressive disease. The median follow up was 7 years. The median overall survival was 9.6 months with 11% estimated to be alive after 5 years. Combined treatment with cisplatin 5-fluorouracil and radiotherapy for inoperable cancer of the esophageal is relatively well tolerated and reasonably efficacious in a very selected group of patients.

Anal canal cancer rate is relatively high among HIV-positive patients, particularly in homosexual men, where it is twice that of HIV-negative homosexual men. As for uterine cervix cancer, it is possible that anal canal cancer is linked to human papillomaviruses (HPV): in fact, its oncogenic serotypes are found in 60% of tumours. Most of anal mucosa in HIV-positive patients is infected by HPV. It causes Anal Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions (ASTI): low grade and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, which can probably progress to invasive anal cancer. In the anal mucosa, HPV induces clinically flat condylomata. They generally are invisible and revealed only by acetic acid application. Sixty percent of seropositive gay men and 26% of seropositive women have anal ASTI. This rate is higher than in the general population. A decreasing of systemic and local immunity and so probable interactions between HPV and HIV could explain the frequency of anal ASTI among seropositive patients. Introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy does not really influence the evolution of anal dysplasia. Screening of preneoplastic lesion is possible with anal Pap smear, and when it is positive, patients must undergo high resolution anuscopy. Cost effectiveness analyses indicate that only the highest risk group (HIV-positive gay men) should have anal screening. Only high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions have to he systematically treated, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions could he simply followed up. The best treatment of anal dysplasia is surgical excision, with careful follow-up, because of high recurrence rate among seropositive patients., (Copyright John Libbey Eurotext 2003.)