Search

Endurance-trained athletes experience a low level of postprandial lipaemia, but this rapidly increases with detraining. We sought to determine whether detraining-induced changes to postprandial metabolism influenced endothelial function and inflammation. Eight endurance-trained men each undertook two oral fat tolerance tests [blood taken fasted and for 6 h following a high-fat test meal (80 g fat, 80 g carbohydrate)]: one during a period of their normal training (trained) and one after 1 wk of no exercise (detrained). Endothelial function in the cutaneous microcirculation was assessed using laser Doppler imaging with iontophoresis in the fasted state and 4 h postprandially during each test. Fasting plasma triglyceride (TG) concentrations increased by 35% with detraining (P = 0.002), as did postprandial plasma (by 53%, P = 0.002), chylomicron (by 68%, P = 0.02) and very low-density lipoprotein (by 51%, P = 0.005) TG concentrations. Endothelial function decreased postprandially in both the trained (by 17%, P = 0.03) and detrained (by 22%, P = 0.03) conditions but did not differ significantly between the trained and detrained conditions in either the fasted or the postprandial states. These results suggest that, although fat ingestion induces endothelial dysfunction, interventions that alter postprandial TG metabolism will not necessarily concomitantly influence endothelial function.

Purpose of Review: Plasma lipoproteins carry a number of highly active enzymes in the circulation. One of these is lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) (Lp-PLA(2)), also known as platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase. This review addresses the molecular properties of Lp-PLA(2), the controversy surrounding its role in atherosclerosis and the regulation of its plasma levels in humans., Recent Findings: Recent reports indicate that the enzyme Lp-PLA(2) found in both LDL and HDL may be independently regulated in these lipoprotein subclasses and have distinct roles in atherogenesis. Seminal findings establishing the response-to-retention hypothesis of atherosclerosis support further the potentially damaging role that in-situ release of LDL-associated oxidative products by Lp-PLA(2) may have in the formation of arterial wall lesions. In the mouse, where Lp-PLA(2) circulates mainly bound to HDL, overexpression leads to reduced atherosclerosis, raising the possibility that the enzyme in HDL may have a protective role. Further evidence for a potential protective role is seen in studies of partial or complete deficiency of the enzyme. In the more general setting of population studies, however, it is clear that Lp-PLA(2) is a positive risk factor for coronary disease and measurements of its mass may contribute to the prediction of coronary heart disease risk, especially in individuals with low LDL cholesterol levels., Summary: Lp-PLA(2) is an enzyme with potentially multiple risks in atherosclerosis. In humans the weight of evidence suggests that it is a positive risk factor for coronary heart disease - an observation commensurate with its position in the direct pathological sequence leading from formation of oxidized LDL in the artery wall to cellular dysfunction and formation of lesions.

Background: Replacing dietary saturated fatty acids (SFAs) with monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) lowers LDL cholesterol, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear., Objective: We assessed the effects of replacing dietary SFAs with MUFAs on concentrations and subclass distributions of VLDL, intermediate-density lipoprotein, LDL, and HDL and on VLDL apolipoprotein B kinetics., Design: Thirty-five moderately hypercholesterolemic, middle-aged volunteers consumed for 6 wk, in random order, diets containing low (L-MUFA; 7.8% of energy from MUFAs), moderate (M-MUFA; 10.3% from MUFAs), or high (H-MUFA; 13.7% from MUFAs) amounts of MUFAs. Fasting blood samples were taken from all subjects after each intervention. VLDL apolipoprotein B kinetic studies were performed in a subgroup after the L-MUFA and H-MUFA diets., Results: Plasma cholesterol concentrations decreased in a dose-dependent manner with increasing intakes of dietary MUFAs. This change was entirely accounted for by reduced LDL cholesterol (-0.20 and -0.49 mmol/L after the M-MUFA and H-MUFA diets, respectively, compared with the concentration after the L-MUFA diet; P for trend < 0.01). Plasma triacylglycerol and HDL cholesterol were not significantly affected by the dietary intervention, nor were the concentrations of VLDL(1) (S(f) 60-400), VLDL(2) (S(f) 20-60), or intermediate-density lipoprotein (S(f) 12-20). Production and catabolic rates for VLDL(1) and VLDL(2) were also unaffected. HDL and LDL subclass distributions were not significantly altered, but as a consequence of the overall LDL lowering, concentrations of atherogenic LDL-III were 25% lower after the H-MUFA diet than after the L-MUFA diet (P = 0.02)., Conclusion: The effects of replacing dietary SFAs with MUFAs on lipoprotein metabolism appear to be almost exclusively limited to the LDL density class.

Small dense LDL is now emerging as an important risk factor for coronary artery disease. The amount of the LDL III has been reported to differ between ethnic groups. To investigate differences in the distribution of LDL subfractions between Korean and Scottish populations, we measured the plasma concentration and percent distribution of three major LDL subfractions in age-and sex-matched, middle aged, healthy 124 Korean and Scottish subjects (32 Korean men vs. 32 Scottish men; 30 Korean women vs. 30 Scottish women). Body mass index and waist circumference did not differ between the two ethnic groups. Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol concentrations were higher in Scottish men compared with Korean men (P<0.01), while plasma triglyceride concentration was higher in Korean men and women (P<0.01 in men, P<0.05 in women). HDL cholesterol concentrations in both Korean men and women were lower than that of their Scottish counterparts (P<0.05 in men; P<0.001 in women). Korean men had lower concentrations of total LDL (242+/-65 vs. 325+/-122 mg/dl, P<0.01), LDL I (24+/-18 vs. 60+/-36 mg/dl, P<0.001) and LDL II (110+/-56 vs. 196+/-78 mg/dl, P<0.001). In contrast, LDL III concentration was markedly higher in Korean men (108+/-75 vs. 70+/-65 mg/dl, P<0.05). Likewise, the percent of LDL I (10.0+/-7.3 vs. 19.1+/-10.1%, P<0.001) and LDL II (47.2+/-20.7 vs. 60.1+/-10.9%, P<0.01) were lower in Korean men, while that of LDL III was higher (42.8+/-24.9 vs. 20.8+/-15.0%, P<0.001). In the female population, there were no differences in total LDL and LDL I concentrations between Korean and Scottish. LDL II concentration was lower in Korean women (106+/-53 vs. 151+/-57 mg/dl, P<0.01). Korean women showed a higher percent of LDL III (24.8+/-24.7 vs. 14.2+/-5.9%, P<0.05) and a lower LDL II (47.8+/-19.1 vs. 61.0+/-10.0%, P<0.01). Multiple linear regression revealed that plasma triglyceride concentration was the most important determinant of the LDL III subfraction concentration in Korean men and women and in Scottish men. In Korean men, the LDL III concentration rose linearly through the whole range of plasma triglyceride concentration, whereas in Scottish men, there was a threshold at 108 mg/dl triglyceride above which there was a positive association. Korean women showed the same pattern as Scottish men. We suggest that LDL concentrations and LDL subfraction distributions are regulated differently in these two ethnic groups. The different relationships between triglyceride and LDL III subfraction in Koreans versus Scots suggest that other factors, such as hepatic lipase or cholesteryl ester transfer protein may additionally play a role determining the LDL subfraction profile.

Accumulating evidence implicates inflammation as a potential pathway in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. The objective of the present study was to assess the ability of C-reactive protein (CRP) to predict the development of diabetes in middle-aged men in the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. Baseline plasma samples for CRP measurement were available for 5,245 men of whom 127 were classified as having a transition from normal glucose control to overt diabetes during the study, based on American Diabetes Association criteria. Baseline CRP was an important predictor of the development of diabetes in univariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] for an increase of 1 SD = 1.55; 95% CI 1.32-1.82; P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, CRP remained a predictor of diabetes development (HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.07-1.58; P = 0.0075) independent of other clinically employed predictors, including baseline BMI and fasting triglyceride and glucose concentrations. Moreover, there was a graded increase in risk across CRP quintiles throughout the study, evident at even 1 year of follow-up. The highest quintile (CRP >4.18 mg/l) was associated with a greater than threefold risk of developing diabetes (HR 3.07; 95% CI 1.33-7.10) in a multivariate analysis at 5 years. Thus, CRP predicts the development of type 2 diabetes in middle-aged men independently of established risk factors. Because CRP, the most commonly used acute-phase protein in clinical practice, is very stable in serum, our observations have clinical potential in helping to better predict individuals destined to develop type 2 diabetes. They also add to the notion that low-grade inflammation is important in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes.

Patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria have impaired clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. This results in the atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype (mild hypertriglyceridemia, low high-density lipoproteins [HDL], and excess small, dense low-density lipoproteins [LDLIII]). Excess remnant lipoproteins (RLP) are linked to hypertriglyceridemia and may contribute to the atherogenicity of nephrotic dyslipidemia. A randomized crossover study compared the effects of a statin (cerivastatin) and a fibrate (fenofibrate) on LDLIII and RLP in 12 patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria. Cerivastatin reduced cholesterol (21%, P: < 0.01), triglyceride (14%, P: < 0.05), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C; 23%, P: < 0.01), total LDL (18%, P: < 0.01), and LDLIII concentration (27% P: < 0.01). %LDLIII, RLP-C, and RLP triglyceride (RLP-TG) were unchanged. Plasma LDLIII reduction with cerivastatin treatment correlated with LDL-C reduction (r(2) = 34%, P: < 0.05). Fenofibrate lowered cholesterol (19%), triglyceride (41%), very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (52%), LDLIII concentration (49%), RLP-C (35%), and RLP-TG (44%; all P: < 0.01). Fenofibrate also reduced %LDLIII from 60 to 33% (P: < 0.01). HDL-C (19%, P: < 0.01) increased with fenofibrate treatment; LDL-C and total LDL were unchanged. The reduction in LDLIII concentration and RLP-C with fenofibrate treatment correlated with plasma triglyceride reduction (LDLIII r(2) = 67%, P: < 0.001; RLP cholesterol r(2) = 58%, P: < 0.005). Serum creatinine increased with fenofibrate treatment (14%, P: < 0.01); however, creatinine clearance was unchanged. LDLIII concentration was 187 +/- 85 mg/dl after cerivastatin treatment and 133 +/- 95 mg/dl after fenofibrate treatment. Cerivastatin and fenofibrate reduce LDLIII concentration in nephrotic-range proteinuria. However, atherogenic concentrations of LDLIII remain prevalent after either treatment. Fenofibrate but not cerivastatin reduces remnant lipoproteins. The two treatments seem to reduce LDLIII by different mechanisms, suggesting a potential role for combination therapy to optimize lowering of LDLIII and RLP.