351. A Systematic Review to Summarise and Appraise the Reporting of Surgical Innovation: a Case Study in Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.
- Author
-
Huttman, Marc M., Smith, Alexander N., Robertson, Harry F., Purves, Rory, Biggs, Sarah E., Dewi, Ffion, Dixon, Lauren K., Kirkham, Emily N., Jones, Conor S., Ramirez, Jozel, Scroggie, Darren L., Pathak, Samir, Blencowe, Natalie S., on behalf of the RoboSurg collaborative group, Main, Barry, Blazeby, Jane, Dawson, Sarah, Wilkinson, Aimee, Jones, Annabel, and Abbas, Aya
- Abstract
Robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RRYGB) is an innovative alternative to traditional laparoscopic approaches. Literature has been published investigating its safety/efficacy; however, the quality of reporting is uncertain. This systematic review used the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term follow-up (IDEAL) framework to assess the reporting quality of available literature. A narrative summary was formulated, assessing how comprehensively governance/ethics, patient selection, demographics, surgeon expertise/training, technique description and outcomes were reported. Forty-seven studies published between 2005 and 2024 were included. There was incomplete/inconsistent reporting of governance/ethics, patient selection, surgeon expertise/training and technique description, with heterogenous outcome reporting. RRYGB reporting was poor and did not align with IDEAL guidance. Robust prospective studies reporting findings using IDEAL/other guidance are required to facilitate safe widespread adoption of RRYGB and other surgical innovations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF