Search

Osteoarthritis of the shoulder is frequently associated with posterior glenoid wear, which may be difficult to correct during shoulder arthroplasty. This study was designed to evaluate the risks that a prosthetic glenoid implanted in retroversion will loosen. The scapula, the humerus, the rotator cuff, and a total shoulder prosthesis were reconstructed with a 3-dimensional finite element model. The glenoid was placed in 5 different angles of retroversion (0 degrees , 5 degrees , 10 degrees , 15 degrees , and 20 degrees ). Location of the glenohumeral contact point, articular pressure, bone and cement stress, and micromotion around the glenoid implant were calculated during internal and external rotation. Glenoid retroversion induced a posterior displacement of the glenohumeral contact point during internal and external rotation, inducing a significant increase of stress within the cement mantel (+326%) and within the glenoid bone (+162%). Furthermore, a major increase of micromotion was measured at the bone-cement interface (+706%). According to this study, glenoid retroversion exceeding 10 degrees should be corrected during total shoulder arthroplasty. If the correction is impossible, not replacing the glenoid should be considered.

We present a framework for statistical finite element analysis combining shape and material properties, and allowing performing statistical statements of biomechanical performance across a given population. In this paper, we focus on the design of orthopaedic implants that fit a maximum percentage of the target population, both in terms of geometry and biomechanical stability. CT scans of the bone under consideration are registered non-rigidly to obtain correspondences in position and intensity between them. A statistical model of shape and intensity (bone density) is computed by means of principal component analysis. Afterwards, finite element analysis (FEA) is performed to analyse the biomechanical performance of the bones. Realistic forces are applied on the bones and the resulting displacement and bone stress distribution are calculated. The mechanical behaviour of different PCA bone instances is compared.

Background: Although shoulder arthroplasty is an accepted treatment for osteoarthritis, loosening of the glenoid component, which mainly occurs at the bone-cement interface, remains a major concern. Presently, the mechanical effect of the cement mantel thickness on the bone-cement interface is still unclear., Methods: Finite element analysis of a prosthetic scapula was used to evaluate the effect of cement thickness on stresses and micromotions at the bone-cement interface. The glenoid component was all-polyethylene, keeled and flat back. Cement mantel thickness was gradually increased from 0.5 to 2.0 mm. Two glenohumeral contact forces were applied: concentric and eccentric. Two extreme cases were considered for the bone-cement interface: bonded and debonded., Findings: Within cement, stress increased as cement thickness decreased, reaching the fatigue limit below 1.0 mm. Bone stress was below its ultimate strength and was minimum between 1.0 and 1.5mm. Interface stress was close to the interface strength, and also minimum between 1.0 and 1.5 mm. Both the decentring of the load and the debonding of the interface increased the stress., Interpretation: A cement thinning weakens the cement, but also the bone-cement interface, along the back-keel edges. Conversely, a cement thickening rigidifies the cemented implant, consequently increasing interfacial stresses and micromotions. To avoid both excessive cement fatigue and interface failure, an ideal cement thickness has been identified between 1.0 and 1.5 mm.