Search

We have quantified voluntarily selected perceived slant of real trapezoidal surfaces (a 'reverse-perspective' scene) and their photographed counterparts (pictorial space). The surfaces were slanted about the vertical axis and observers estimated slant relative to the frontal plane. We were particularly interested in those cases in which binocular disparity and monocular perspective provided conflicting slant information. We varied the monocularly and binocularly specified surface slants independently across stimulus presentations. To eliminate texture and shading cues we used sand-blasted aluminium trapezoidal surfaces illuminated from all directions. When disparity-specified slant and perspective-specified slant were conflicting, observers were able to perceive the surfaces in two ways: they perceived either a trapezoid or a rectangle. Our main finding is twofold. First, when subjects chose to perceive the trapezoid, the slant estimates followed the disparity-predicted slant with only a slight underestimation, as if they selected a pure binocular representation of slant governed only by disparity. Second, when subjects chose to perceive the rectangle their estimates for real surfaces were similar to those for photographed surfaces, as if they selected a representation of slant governed by perspective foreshortening.

A way to study conscious perception is to expose the visual system to an ambiguous stimulus that instigates bi-stable perception. This provides the opportunity to study neural underpinnings related to the percepts rather than to the stimulus. We have recently developed a slant-rivalry paradigm that has beneficial metrical (quantitative) aspects and that exhibits temporal aspects of perceptual reversals that seemed to be under considerable voluntary control of the observer. Here we examined a range of different aspects of the temporal dynamics of the perceptual reversals of slant rivalry and we compared these with the dynamics of orthogonal grating rivalry, house-face rivalry, and Necker cube rivalry. We found that slant rivalry exhibits a qualitatively similar pattern of dynamics. The drift of the perceptual reversal rate, both across successive experimental repetitions, and across successive 35-s portions of data were similar. The sequential dependence of the durations of perceptual phases, too, revealed very similar patterns. The main quantitative difference, which could make slant rivalry a useful stimulus for future neurophysiological studies, is that the percept durations are relatively long compared to the other rivalry stimuli. In the paper that accompanies this paper [van Ee, R., van Dam, L. C. J., Brouwer, G. J. (2005). Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. Vision Research,] we focused on the role of voluntary control in the dynamics of perceptual reversals.

Voluntary control and conscious perception seem to be related: when we are confronted with ambiguous images we are in some cases and to some extent able to voluntarily select a percept. However, to date voluntary control has not been used in neurophysiological studies on the correlates of conscious perception, presumably because the dynamic of perceptual reversals was not suitable. We exposed the visual system to four ambiguous stimuli that instigate bi-stable perception: slant rivalry, orthogonal grating rivalry, house-face rivalry, and Necker cube rivalry. In the preceding companion paper [van Ee, R. (2005). Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry. Vision Research] we focussed on the temporal dynamics of the perceptual reversals. Here we examined the role of voluntary control in the dynamics of perceptual reversals. We asked subjects to attempt to hold percepts and to speed-up the perceptual reversals. The investigations across the four stimuli revealed qualitative similarities concerning the influence of voluntary control on the temporal dynamics of perceptual reversals. We also found differences. In comparison to the other rivalry stimuli, slant rivalry exhibits: (1) relatively long percept durations; (2) a relatively clear role of voluntary control in modifying the percept durations. We advocate that these aspects, alongside with its metrical (quantitative) aspects, potentially make slant rivalry an interesting tool in studying the neural underpinnings of visual awareness.

In order to perceive stereoscopic depth, the visual system must define binocular disparities. Consider an oblique line seen through an aperture formed by flanking occluders. Because the line is perceived behind the aperture, the line must have disparity relative to the aperture. What is the assigned disparity of the line in this aperture problem? To answer this question five observers adjusted the horizontal disparity of a probe until it was perceived at the same depth as the disparate line behind the aperture. The results show that, when both the horizontal and the vertical disparities of the occluders are well-defined, the probe must have the same horizontal disparity as the horizontal separation between the line half-images. However, when the horizontal and vertical disparities of the occluders are ill-defined, the intersections of the line and the occluder borders can determine the matching direction. In the latter case, the matching direction varies with the aperture orientation and there is considerable variability across observers.

We examined whether binocular saccadic eye movements are determined solely by disparity-defined slant or whether they are influenced by both disparity-defined and perceived slant. The Werner illusion was used to distinguish a plane's disparity-defined slant from its perceived slant. Three subjects viewed a horizontally elongated test strip that was flanked vertically by two planes. The perceived slant of the test strip depended on the slant of the flanking planes. Subjects estimated the perceived slant of the test strip by adjusting the angle between two lines in a symbolic top view. The saccadic eye movements between targets on the test strip were recorded both with visual feedback ("later saccades") and without visual feedback ("first saccades"). We calculated vergence differences for saccades between targets on the test strip (and for fixation on these targets). For each geometrical test strip slant we examined whether the vergence differences could be explained as an effect of perceived slant. This study shows that saccadic eye movements are determined predominantly by the disparity-defined slant, but they can be affected by perceived slant, particularly when multiple saccades are being made.

Our two eyes receive different views of a visual scene, and the resulting binocular disparities enable us to reconstruct its three-dimensional layout. However, the visual environment is also rich in monocular depth cues. We examined the resulting percept when observers view a scene in which there are large conflicts between the surface slant signaled by binocular disparities and the slant signaled by monocular perspective. For a range of disparity-perspective cue conflicts, many observers experience bistability: They are able to perceive two distinct slants and to flip between the two percepts in a controlled way. We present a Bayesian model that describes the quantitative aspects of perceived slant on the basis of the likelihoods of both perspective and disparity slant information combined with prior assumptions about the shape and orientation of objects in the scene. Our Bayesian approach can be regarded as an overarching framework that allows researchers to study all cue integration aspects-including perceptual decisions--in a unified manner.

In order to perceive depth from binocular disparities the visual system has to identify matching features of the two retinal images. Normally, the assigned disparity is unambiguously determined by monocularly visible matching constraints. The assigned disparity is ambiguous when matching is unconstrained, such as when we view an isolated long oblique disparate line. Recently we found that in order to perceive a depth probe at the same depth as the oblique line, the probe needs to have the same horizontal disparity as the line (i.e. matching occurs along horizontal "search-zones" [Vis. Res. 40 (2000) 151]). Here we examined whether the depth probe disparity in unconstrained matching of long lines is influenced by cyclovergence, by cyclorotation between stereogram half-images, or by combinations of the two. We measured retinal rotation (>6 deg in cyclovergence conditions). We found that in those conditions in which the retinal images were the same (a condition with, say, both zero cyclovergence and zero cyclorotation between the half-images, creates the same retinal images as a condition with both 6 deg cyclovergence and 6 deg cyclorotation) assigned depth was the same too, i.e. independent of cyclovergence. Thus, the assigned depth of the test-line seems to be determined solely by the retinal test-line orientation, implying that the binocular matching algorithm does not seem to incorporate the eyes' cyclovergence when matching is unconstrained.

The aim of this study was to find out to what extent binocular matching is facilitated by motion when stereoanomalous and normal subjects estimate the perceived depth of a 3-D stimulus containing excessive matching candidates. Thirty subjects viewed stimuli that consisted of bars uniformly distributed inside a volume. They judged the perceived depth-to-width ratio of the volume by adjusting the aspect ratio of an outline rectangle (a metrical 3-D task). Although there were large inter-subject differences in the depth perceived, the experimental results yielded a good correlation with stereoanomaly (the inability to distinguish disparities of different magnitudes and/or signs in part of the disparity spectrum). The results cannot be explained solely by depth-cue combination. Since up to 30% of the population is stereoanomalous, stereoscopic experiments would yield more informative results if subjects were first characterized with regard to their stereo capacities. Intriguingly, it was found that motion does not help to define disparities in subjects who are able to perceive depth-from-disparity in half of the disparity spectrum. These stereoanomalous subjects were found to rely completely on the motion signals. This suggests that the perception of volumetric depth in subjects with normal stereoscopic vision requires the joint processing of crossed and uncrossed disparities.

Retinal velocity distributions can lead to a percept of three-dimensional (3D) structure (structure-from-motion [SFM]). SFM stimuli are intrinsically ambiguous with regard to depth ordering. A classic example is the orthographic projection of a revolving transparent cylinder, which can be perceived as a 3D cylinder that rotates clockwise and counterclockwise alternately. Prevailing models attribute such bistable percepts to inhibitory connections between neurons that are tuned to opposite motion directions at equal binocular disparities. Cylinder stimuli can yield not only two but as many as four different percepts. Besides the well-documented clockwise and counterclockwise spinning transparent cylinders, observers can also perceive two transparent half-cylinders, either convex or concave, one in front of the other. Observers are able to bias the time during which a percept is present by attending to one or the other percept. We examined this phenomenon quantitatively and found that in standard SFM stimuli, the percept of two convex transparent half-cylinders can occur just as often as the percept of (counter-) clockwise spinning cylinders. So far, however, all interpretations of experimental (neurophysiological) data and all proposed mechanisms for SFM perception have focused solely on the two classical cylinder percepts. Prevailing models cannot explain the existence of the other two percepts. We suggest an alternative model to explain attention-biased multi-stable perception.

Two different colours, one presented to one eye and the other presented to the other eye, often create the impression of a third colour. This percept is known as binocular colour mixture. Here we use coloured stereograms to study binocular colour appearance. Vivid pastel colours are induced in monocular, achromatic patches, if these are placed in stereograms whose left and right images differ in colour. The build-up of the colours is slow and takes tens of seconds or even minutes in certain individuals. The induced colours remain visible during monocular viewing of the patch and decay gradually. The same colours are induced irrespective of whether the patches are placed in fusible or rivalrous stereograms. We show that these colour effects cannot be induced by monocular colour mechanisms, either alone or in combination with binocular colour mixing. We suggest that the colours are induced by a binocular feedback mechanism, which reduces colour differences between the colour appearances of two monocular images. Induced colours are not observed if the achromatic patches are binocular. However, induced colours are apparent if one switches to monocular viewing after prolonged binocular viewing of the binocular patches. This aftereffect suggests that binocular colour induction acts on the monocular representations of binocular images. We suggest that during binocular viewing the fast process of binocular colour mixing masks the changes in colour appearance produced by the much slower process of binocular colour induction.

During binocular fixation, the eyes usually point in different directions, and yet, each object is judged to lie in a single direction. It is commonly believed that a particular location in the head serves as the origin for such directional judgments. This location is known as the cyclopean eye. We argue here that observers can judge visually perceived directions from angular information alone, and do not require positional information supplied by a cyclopean eye. We show that experimental findings reported as evidence for the cyclopean concept can also be explained solely by angular information without the need for a cyclopean eye. Recent findings concerning binocular shape perception and the cyclopean illusion demonstrate that binocular perception is incompatible with vision from a single vantage point. The concept of the cyclopean eye is sometimes inappropriate and always irrelevant as far as vision is concerned.

It has been well established that vertical disparity is involved in perception of the three-dimensional layout of a visual scene. The goal of this paper was to examine whether vertical disparities can alter perceived direction. We dissociated the common relationship between vertical disparity and the stimulus direction by applying a vertical magnification to the image presented to one eye. We used a staircase paradigm to measure whether perceived straight-ahead depended on the amount of vertical magnification in the stimulus. Subjects judged whether a test dot was flashed to either the left or the right side of straight-ahead. We found that perceived straight-ahead did indeed depend on the amount of vertical magnification but only after subjects adapted (for 5 min) to vertical scale (and only in five out of nine subjects). We argue that vertical disparity is a factor in the calibration of the relationship between eye-position signals and perceived direction.

We examined how much depth we perceive when viewing a depiction of a slanted plane in which binocular disparity and monocular perspective provide different slant information. We exposed observers to a grid stimulus in which the monocular--and binocular-specified grid orientations were varied independently across stimulus presentations. The grids were slanted about the vertical axis and observers estimated the slant relative to the frontal plane. We were particularly interested in the metrical aspects of perceived slant for a broad spectrum of possible combinations of disparity--and perspective-specified slants. We found that observers perceived only one grid orientation when the two specified orientations were similar. More interestingly, when the monocular--and binocular-specified orientations were rather different, observers experienced perceptual bi-stability (they were able to select either a perspective--or a disparity-dominated percept).

Stereoanomaly is the failure to see differences in depth when the viewer is presented with stimuli having different magnitudes of stereoscopic disparity. In the absence of eye movements, everyone suffers from stereoanomaly for extremely large disparities. Typically, such disparities are seen at the same depth as monocular stimuli. However, about 30%, of the population exhibit some form of stereoanomaly even for very small disparities, provided eye movements are avoided. In some cases, the sign of the disparity will be confused, and the perceived depth will be incorrectly seen as 'behind' rather than 'in front of' the fixation point, for example. Because anomalies provide useful information about perceptual mechanisms, tests that measure and quantify the extent of a blindness are important investigative tools for research. Here we offer two easy-to-administer tests for stereoanomaly. The first test is based on depth judgments of two bars relative to a fixation point. The second test involves judgments of volumetric stimuli, seen stereoscopically. In each case, subjects indicate depth by setting a rectangle (with fixed base) to match the perceived depth. Although both tests are correlated, some differences in stereo processing are seen, depending upon whether or not the stimuli are presented near the point of fixation.

The spatial differences between the images seen by the two eyes, called binocular disparities, can be used to recover the volumetric (three-dimensional) aspects of a scene. The computation of disparity depends upon the correct identification of corresponding features in the two images. Understanding what image features are used by the brain to solve this matching problem is one of the main issues in stereoscopic vision. Many cortical neurons in visual areas V1 (ref. 2), MT (refs 3, 4) and MST (refs 5, 6) that are tuned to binocular disparity are also tuned to orientation, motion direction and speed. Although psychophysical work has shown that motion direction can facilitate binocular matching, the psychophysical literature on the role of orientation is mixed, and it has been argued that speed differences are ineffective in aiding correspondence. Here we use a different psychophysical paradigm to show that the visual system uses similarities in orientation, motion direction and speed to achieve binocular correspondence. These results indicate that cells that multiplex orientation, motion direction, speed and binocular disparity may help to solve the binocular matching problem.

Subjects were examined for practice effects in a stereoscopic slant-estimation task involving surfaces that comprised a large portion of the visual field. In most subjects slant estimation was significantly affected by practice, but only when an isolated surface (an absolute disparity gradient) was present in the visual field. When a second, unslanted, surface was visible (providing a second disparity gradient and thereby also a relative disparity gradient) none of the subjects exhibited practice effects. Apparently, stereoscopic slant estimation is more robust or stable over time in the presence of a second surface than in its absence. In order to relate the practice effects, which occurred without feedback, to perceptual learning, results are interpreted within a cue-interaction framework. In this paradigm the contribution of a cue depends on its reliability. It is suggested that normally absolute disparity gradients contribute relatively little to perceived slant and that subjects learn to increase this contribution by utilizing proprioceptive information. It is argued that--given the limited computational power of the brain--a relatively small contribution of absolute disparity gradients in perceived slant enhances the stability of stereoscopic slant perception.

Occlusion geometry gives rise to interocular shifts in the positions of binocularly viewed contour junctions. Since these shifts do not give rise to normal binocular disparities, they have been called 'pseudodisparities'. Previous work has shown that the unmatched contour segments of a partially occluded contour at occlusion junctions can be used to recover the geometry of the occluding surface through the construction of 'illusory' contours. Here, experiments were performed to determine whether such junction shifts could enhance stereoscopic depth detection when the relative disparity between the contours was below threshold. Our results showed that stereoscopic depth detection does not improve when pseudodisparity is present. We conclude that the visual system is less sensitive to pseudodisparity than to conventional disparity information. We suggest that the primary role of pseudodisparity is to overcome conditions of camouflage.

In monocular vision, the horizontal/vertical aspect ratio (shape) of a frontoparallel rectangle can be based on the comparison of the perceived directions of the rectangle's edges. In binocular vision of a typical three-dimensional scene (when occlusions are present), this is not the case: Frontoparallel rectangles would be perceived in a distorted fashion if an observer were to base perceived aspect ratio on the perceived directions of the rectangle's edges. We psychophysically investigated stereoscopically perceived aspect ratios of frontoparallel occluding and occluded rectangles for various distances and fixation depths. We found that observers did not perceive the distortions that would be predicted on the basis of the above-mentioned comparison of the perceived visual directions of the edges of the rectangle. Our results strongly suggest that the mechanism that determines perceived aspect ratio is dissociated from the mechanism that determines perceived direction. The consequences of the findings for the Kanizsa, Poggendorff, and horizontal/vertical illusions are discussed.

The computation of horizontal binocular disparities used in stereoscopic depth perception depends upon the identification of corresponding features in the two retinal images. In principle, binocular matching is a two-dimensional problem that considers matches in all possible meridians. Normally, constraints such as end points or crossing points limit the direction and magnitude of matches. If matching is unconstrained, such as is the case with long lines, it is completely ambiguous. Under these conditions the default match will be determined by the operating range, or upper disparity limit, of matchable vertical and horizontal disparities. We computed the operating range of vertical matches for stereoscopic depth as a function of line orientation. Our results suggest that the two-dimensional operating range is anisotropic for vertical and horizontal disparity and that unconstrained matches are not based upon either epipolar geometry or nearest neighbor constraints, but rather the mean of disparity estimates within the operating range for binocular matches. This operating range can be extended vertically when matches are constrained by image primitives.

When an opaque object occludes a more distant object, the two eyes often see different parts of the distant object. Hering's laws of visual direction make an interesting prediction for this situation: the part seen by both eyes should be seen in a different direction than the part seen by one eye. We examined whether this prediction holds by asking observers to align a vertical monocular line segment with a nearby vertical binocular segment. We found it necessary to correct the alignment data for vergence errors, which were measured in a control experiment, and for monocular spatial distortions, which were also measured in a control experiment. Settings were reasonably consistent with Hering's laws when the monocular and binocular targets were separated by 30 arcmin or more. Observers aligned the targets as if they were viewing them from one eye only when they were separated by 2 arcmin; this behavior is consistent with an observation reported by Erkelens and colleagues. The same behavior was observed when the segments were horizontal and when no visible occluder was present. Perceived visual direction when the two eyes see different parts of a distant target is assigned in a fashion that minimizes, but does not eliminate, distortions of the shape of the occluded object.

The slant of a stereoscopically defined surface cannot be determined solely from horizontal disparities or from derived quantities such as horizontal size ratio (HSR). There are four other signals that, in combination with horizontal disparity, could in principle allow an unambiguous estimate of slant: the vergence and version of the eyes, the vertical size ratio (VSR), and the horizontal gradient of VSR. Another useful signal is provided by perspective slant cues. The determination of perceived slant can be modeled as a weighted combination of three estimates based on those signals: a perspective estimate, a stereoscopic estimate based on HSR and VSR, and a stereoscopic estimate based on HSR and sensed eye position. In a series of experiments, we examined human observers' use of the two stereoscopic means of estimation. Perspective cues were rendered uninformative. We found that VSR and sensed eye position are both used to interpret the measured horizontal disparities. When the two are placed in conflict, the visual system usually gives more weight to VSR. However, when VSR is made difficult to measure by using short stimuli or stimuli composed of vertical lines, the visual system relies on sensed eye position. A model in which the observer's slant estimate is a weighted average of the slant estimate based on HSR and VSR and the one based on HSR and eye position accounted well for the data. The weights varied across viewing conditions because the informativeness of the signals they employ vary from one situation to another.

The results of several experiments demonstrate that the estimated magnitude of perceived slant of large stereoscopic surfaces increases with the duration of the presentation. In these experiments, subjects were free to make eye movements. A possible explanation for the increase is that the visual system needs to scan the stimulus with eye movements (which take time) before it can make a reliable estimate of slant. We investigated the influence of large scanning eye movements on stereoscopic slant estimation of large surfaces. Six subjects estimated the magnitude of slant about the vertical or horizontal axis induced by large-field stereograms of which one half-image was transformed by horizontal scale, horizontal shear, vertical scale, vertical shear, divergence or rotation relative to the other half-image. The experiment was blocked in three sessions. Each session was devoted to one of the following fixation strategies: central fixation, peripheral (20 deg) fixation and active scanning of the stimulus. The presentation duration in each of the sessions was 0.5, 2 or 8 s. Estimations were done with and without a visual reference. The magnitudes of estimated slant and the perceptual biases were not significantly influenced by the three fixation strategies. Thus, our results provide no support for the hypothesis that the time used for the execution of large scanning eye movements explains the build-up of estimated slant with the duration of the stimulus presentation.

When a small frontoparallel surface (a test strip) is surrounded by a larger slanted surface (an inducer), the test strip is perceived as slanted in the direction opposite to the inducer. This has been called the depth-contrast effect, but we call it the slant-contrast effect. In nearly all demonstrations of this effect, the inducer's slant is specified by stereoscopic signals; and other signals, such as the texture gradient, specify that it is frontoparallel. We present a theory of slant estimation that determines surface slant via linear combination of various slant estimators; the weight of each estimator is proportional to its reliability. The theory explains slant contrast because the absolute slant of the inducer and the relative slant between test strip and inducer are both estimated with greater reliability than the absolute slant of the test strip. The theory predicts that slant contrast will be eliminated if the signals specifying the inducer's slant are consistent with one another. It also predicts reversed slant contrast if the inducer's slant is specified by nonstereoscopic signals rather than by stereo signals. These predictions were tested and confirmed in three experiments. The first showed that slant contrast is greatly reduced when the stereo-specified and nonstereo-specified slants of the inducer are made consistent with one another. The second showed that slant contrast is eliminated altogether when the stimulus consists of real planes rather than images on a display screen. The third showed that slant contrast is reversed when the nonstereo-specified slant of the inducer varies and the stereo-specified slant is zero. We conclude that slant contrast is a byproduct of the visual system's reconciliation of conflicting information while it attempts to determine surface slant.

We investigated temporal aspects of stereoscopically perceived slant produced by the following transformations: horizontal scale, horizontal shear, vertical scale, vertical shear, divergence and rotation, between the half-images of a stereogram. Six subjects viewed large field stimuli (70 degrees diameter) both in the presence and in the absence of a visual reference. The presentation duration was: 0.1, 0.4, 1.6, 6.4 or 25.6 s. Without reference we found the following: rotation and divergence evoked considerable perceived slant in a number of subjects. This finding violates the recently published results of Howard and Kaneko. Slant evoked by vertical scale and shear was similar to slant evoked by horizontal scale and shear but was generally less. With reference we found the following: vertical scale and vertical shear did not evoke slant. Slant due to rotation and divergence was similar to slant due to horizontal scale and shear but was generally less. According to the theory of Howard and Kaneko, perceived slant depends on the difference between horizontal and vertical scale and shear disparities. We made their theory more explicit by translating their proposals into linear mathematical expressions that contain weighting factors that allow for both slant evoked by rotation or divergence, subject-dependent underestimation of slant and other related phenomena reported in the literature. Our data for all stimulus durations and for all subjects is explained by this 'unequal-weighting' extension of Howard and Kaneko's theory.

It is now well established that depth is coded by local horizontal disparity and global vertical disparity. We present a computational model which explains how depth is extracted from these two types of disparities. The model uses the two (one for each eye) headcentric directions of binocular targets, derived from retinal signals and oculomotor signals. Headcentric disparity is defined as the difference between headcentric directions of corresponding features in the left and right eye's images. Using Helmholtz's coordinate systems we decompose headcentric disparity into azimuthal and elevational disparity. Elevational disparities of real objects are zero if the signals which contribute to headcentric disparity do not contain any errors. Azimuthal headcentric disparity is a 1D quantity from which an exact equation relating distance and disparity can be derived. The equation is valid for all headcentric directions and for all binocular fixation positions. Such an equation does not exist if disparity is expressed in retinal coordinates. Possible types of errors in oculomotor signals (six) produce global elevational disparity fields which are characterised by different gradients in the azimuthal and elevational directions. Computations show that the elevational disparity fields uniquely characterise both the type and size of the errors in oculomotor signals. Our model uses a measure of the global elevational disparity field together with local azimuthal disparity to accurately derive headcentric distance throughout the visual field. The model explains existing data on whole-field disparity transformations as well as hitherto unexplained aspects of stereoscopic depth perception.

Investigations of binocular visual direction have concentrated mainly on stationary objects. Eye positions were generally not measured and binocular fixation was assumed to be perfect. During the viewing of stationary objects, vergence errors are not negligible but small. During the viewing of moving objects, however, errors in binocular fixation are much larger. Existing rules for binocular visual direction were examined under the latter, more demanding viewing conditions. Eye movements were measured objectively by the scleral coil technique. Subjects viewed a large stereogram in which the half-images oscillated in counterphase. The stereogram contained two square random-dot patterns placed side by side with a gap in between. A vertical line, visible only to one eye, oscillated in the gap. Subjects were asked to adjust the amplitude of line motion until the line was perceived to be stationary. In so doing, they set amplitudes equal to the amplitudes of half-image motion if the gap between the patterns was narrow. They set amplitudes significantly smaller in wider gaps. Subjects made considerable fixational errors in following the oscillations of the line and the random-dot patterns. The results of the settings and of the retinal errors together refute existing rules for binocular visual direction of monocular objects. Perceived directions of monocular objects cannot be specified by geometrical rules that include only the positions of the objects and of the two eyes. The results suggest that perceived directions of monocular objects are captured by the binocular visual directions of adjacent binocular objects. Capture of binocular visual direction was found to be effective for gaps as wide as 8 deg between the binocular objects. The phenomenon of binocular capture has negative consequences for the general use of nonius lines as indicators of eye position.

Binocular perception of visual direction is based on laws which were formulated more than 100 years ago. These laws govern the directions in which human beings perceive objects visible to both eyes (binocular objects) and objects visible to only one eye (monocular objects). We report here that the laws do not hold for monocular objects adjacent to binocular objects. The perceived directions of these monocular objects are captured by those of nearby binocular objects. Capture of binocular visual direction is an unexpected phenomenon because it refutes the generally accepted notion that a particular retinal location gives rise to a particular subjective visual direction. The practical consequence is that the subjective techniques for measuring eye position which are widely used in fundamental research and clinical practice are unreliable if they are used in densely structured stimuli. We suggest that capture results from a mechanism of lateral interaction between adjacent visual directions. This mechanism ensures that, despite eye movements, objects have the same spatial order in monocular and binocular vision. This conservation of spatial order also explains why retinal blind spots are not manifest in binocular vision.

We systematically analyse the binocular disparity field under various eye, head and stimulus positions and orientations. From the literature we know that certain classes of disparity which involve the entire disparity field (such as those caused by horizontal lateral shift, differential rotation, horizontal scale and horizontal shear between the entire half-images of a stereogram) lead to relatively poor depth perception in the case of limited observation periods. These classes of disparity are found to be similar to the classes of disparities which are brought about by eye and head movements. Our analysis supports the suggestion that binocular depth perception is based primarily (for the first few hundred milliseconds) on classes of disparity that do not change as a result of ego-movement.

We investigated Werner's binocular depth-contrast effect. Subjects viewed stereograms consisting of a test pattern and an inducing pattern. The half-images of the inducing pattern were either horizontally scaled or sheared relative to each other. Subjects judged the (induced) perceived slant of the test pattern. We were interested in what influence the spatial configuration of the test pattern and the inducing pattern had on the depth-contrast effect. We conclude that the depth-contrast effect is a global effect. In other words, it is not restricted to the location of the inducing pattern. The effect decreases with distance, however, in an anisotropic way. The depth-contrast effect was present most prominently when the test pattern was positioned in the direction along the slant (rotation) axis of the inducing pattern. We suggest that Werner's depth-contrast effect can be explained by the (previously reported) findings that: (1) stereopsis is relatively insensitive to whole-field horizontal scale and shear; and (2) stereopsis is very sensitive to horizontal scale and shear of two stimuli relative to each other.

A generally accepted notion in binocular vision is that we see the world as if viewed by a single eye, the cyclopean eye. A consequence of seeing the world from a single point in space is that the outlines of occluding and occluded surfaces have the same shape. We designed stereograms in which subjects aligned binocularly visible lines to each other. The lines were lying in different depth planes. In the vicinity of occluded areas, binocular alignment was achieved by alignment of the lines in the eye that viewed the monocularly visible details. Stereograms in which shapes of surfaces lying in different depth planes were compared to each other show that occluding and occluded surfaces do not have the same shape: a square surface occludes rectangular surfaces in other depth planes of which the horizontal widths are smaller than the vertical widths. This difference is perceived shape is not possible if the centre of binocular direction has a fixed position in the head.

We investigate temporal aspects of binocular slant perception in the presence and absence of a visual reference. Subjects judge slant induced by large-field stereograms of which one half-image is either horizontally scaled or sheared relative to the other half-image. Each stimulus is presented for different observation periods ranging from 0.1 to 19.2 sec. We quantitatively corroborate earlier findings that perceived slant develops significantly faster and to higher levels with visual reference than without it. In daily life, when we are active, there will not be much time for slant to develop. We find that if observation periods are brief (a few seconds or less) slant is poorly perceived if there is no visual reference. We conclude that the visual system is relatively insensitive to large-field horizontal scale and shear.

From the literature it is known that the processing of disparity for slant is different in the presence and in the absence of a visual frame of reference. The experimental finding that vertical disparity is not processed for slant perception in the presence of a visual reference is elaborated. This theoretical analysis results in a reduction of the three basic first-order transformations between the retinal half images (divergence, rotation, and deformation) to only two basic orthogonal transformations. The first of these, horizontal scale, results in slant perception about the vertical axis, whereas the second, horizontal shear, results in slant perception about the horizontal axis. These transformations are based primarily on horizontal disparity. It is shown experimentally that in the presence of a frame of reference the amount of vertical transformation that is added to the two basic transformations (horizontal scale and shear) of a random-dot stimulus is indeed irrelevant for slant perception. It is suggested that, in the presence of a visual reference, slant perception about oblique axes is based solely on linear combinations of the horizontal-scale and horizontal-shear transformations. Subjects are able to reproduce slants about oblique axes experimentally merely by combining horizontal scale and shear.

Generation of free radicals and the ability of various antioxidants to attenuate radical production in freshly procured cancellous bone specimens was investigated, using spin-trapping and electron spin resonance (ESR) techniques. Seven core cancellous bone specimens, 10 mm long and 7.9 mm in diameter, were obtained using aseptic technique, from the proximal portion of the humerus of 9 adult mixed-breed dogs. One core cancellous bone specimen from each dog was incubated in spin trap alpha-phenyl-N-tert-butylnitrone in Eagle's minimum essential medium and served as a control. The other 6 specimens from each dog were incubated in alpha-phenyl-N-tert-butylnitrone/Eagle's minimum essential medium plus 1 of the following antioxidants: superoxide dismutase, catalase, superoxide dismutase/catalase, indomethacin, allopurinol, or deferoxamine mesylate. All specimens were incubated at 26 C for 90 minutes, then frozen at -20 C until they were prepared for analysis by ESR spectroscopy. Each specimen was thawed, homogenized, and extracted in a low-dielectric organic solvent prior to obtaining an ESR spectrum which was analyzed for hyperfine splitting constants to identify radicals. Each first-derivative spectrum was digitally double-integrated to obtain an area: these areas were used to compare intensities of the spin. For each treatment group, the areas from the treated specimens were compared with the areas from the control specimens, using a paired t-test. Significance was accepted at P < or = 0.05. Spin adducts were detected in all cancellous bone specimens. Specimens incubated in deferoxamine (P = 0.0017) and superoxide dismutase/catalase (P = 0.0452) had significantly smaller areas than did control specimens.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Objective: To study the effects of preoperative naproxen on postoperative and post-discharge outcome and consumption of analgesics in patients undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy and laparoscopy for infertility., Methods: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 60 healthy women scheduled for day-case hysteroscopy and laparoscopy. Subjects were randomized to receive either 500-mg naproxen suppositories (n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) preoperatively. Following discharge, each patient was given two naproxen suppositories for treatment of pain at home. Pain was scored on the Visual Analogue Scale, and the postoperative and post-discharge use of analgesics was determined, recorded, and analyzed., Results: Patients premedicated with naproxen had significantly less postoperative pain, showed more rapid ambulation, could be discharged earlier, and had less post-discharge pain. On the day after surgery, only six of 28 naproxen-treated patients needed analgesics, compared to 18 of 30 placebo patients., Conclusion: Day-case diagnostic hysteroscopy and laparoscopy for evaluation of infertility is potentially painful and stressful. Preoperative naproxen contributed to postoperative pain prevention, reduced hospital stay and consumption of analgesics, and shortened the period of post-discharge abdominal discomfort.

We have studied the effect of ketanserin, a selective serotonin S2-receptor antagonist, on surgical bleeding in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. One group of patients (n = 9) received ketanserin 10 mg i.v. followed by an infusion of 0.075 mg kg-1 h-1. The second group (n = 8) received placebo. Both groups were comparable with regard to age, height and body weight. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 454 ml with ketanserin and 894 ml with placebo (P = 0.004; Wilcoxon two-sample test). Mean duration of the operation was less with ketanserin (112 min) than with placebo (134 min) (P = 0.004), but rate of blood loss was also less with ketanserin (4.1 vs 6.7 ml min-1; P = 0.03). In the ketanserin group, mean arterial pressures tended to be less than in the placebo group. Reductions in central venous pressure were similar in both groups. There were no complications in relation to the use of ketanserin.

Progressive inability to open the mouth developed in a cat after trauma to the head. Evaluation revealed a healed depression fracture of the left zygomatic arch and normal temporomandibular joints. Surgical exploration of the fracture confirmed a false ankylosis that developed between the depression fracture and the ramus of the mandible. Treatment included excision of the central portion of the zygomatic arch and a portion of the ramus. The cat regained normal function of its mouth.

A comminuted scapular fracture in a foal was treated surgically by use of 2 dynamic compression plates. The plates were applied upside down, so that the convex surface of the plate faced the bone. At 5 months after surgery, the plates were removed, and the foal recovered without complications.

To prevent cosmetically undesirable orbital concavity after enucleation, methyl methacrylate spheres were implanted into the orbits of 73 dogs and 5 cats. In all cases, follow-up reports were obtained until suture removal 2 weeks after surgery, and for 58 animals (79%) until 6 months after surgery. Information was available for 46 animals (60%) 1 year after surgery, 28 animals (36%) 2 years after surgery, and 7 animals (9%) 3 years after surgery. Implants failed in 3 dogs and 2 cats. Complications were not detected in the remaining 73 animals (93%), and owners were pleased with the cosmetic results. The causes of implant failure in dogs varied; however, in cats, fluid accumulation was the consistent complication associated with failure. Orbital implantation of methyl methacrylate spheres was found to be a safe, practical, and inexpensive method of improving the cosmetic appearance of dogs requiring enucleation. Although the number of cats evaluated was limited, the accumulation of orbital fluid in a high percentage of those suggested that orbital implants may be less successful in this species.

Chronic osteomyelitis and septic arthritis involving the 3rd and 4th metatarsophalangeal joints were diagnosed in a Doberman Pinscher. Arthrodesis of the 3rd and 4th metatarsophalangeal joints resulted in a subtle persistent gait abnormality, but limb function was preserved. Arthrodesis of metatarsophalangeal joints is an alternative to amputation, especially when main weight-bearing digits are involved.

Bronchoesophageal fistula and megaesophagus were diagnosed in a dog. Within 2 days after surgical correction of the bronchoesophageal fistula, peristalsis in the thoracic portion of the esophagus returned to normal and the esophagus resumed its normal size. The cause of the fistula was attributed to damage from a foreign body. The cause of the transient megaesophagus likely was related to the bronchoesophageal fistula.

Osteochondral fragments, which originated from the proximolateral ridge of the talus, were discovered in an 8-month-old Rottweiler. A large fragment was reattached, using a lag screw and wire. Microscopic examination of a small fragment suggested the lesion resulted from osteochondritis dissecans. Stabilization of the major fragment resulted in acceptable joint function.

A domestic shorthair cat examined because of dyspnea was found to have ophthalmoscopic and radiographic changes suggestive of systemic mycosis. The cat died despite antifungal therapy. Histologic examination revealed Blastomyces dermatitidis in the eyes, brain, lungs, stomach, liver, kidneys, spleen, pancreas, and adrenal glands. The pathologic changes were similar, but more widespread than those typically seen with canine blastomycosis.