Search

Objective: Hospital based follow-up has been the standard of care for endometrial cancer. Patient initiated follow-up is a useful adjunct for lower risk cancers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of endometrial cancer patients after stratification into risk groupings, with particular attention to salvageable relapses., Methods: All patients treated surgically for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I-IVA endometrial cancer of all histological subtypes, from January 2009 until March 2019, were analyzed. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment details, relapse, death, and last follow-up dates were collected. Site of relapse, presence of symptoms, and whether relapses were salvageable were also identified. The European Society of Medical Oncology-European Society of Gynecological Oncology 2020 risk stratification was assigned, and relapse free and overall survival were estimated., Results: 900 patients met the eligibility criteria. Median age was 66 years (range 28-96) and follow-up duration was 35 months (interquartile range 19-57). In total, 16% (n=144) of patients relapsed, 1.3% (n=12) from the low risk group, 3.9% (n=35) from the intermediate risk group, 2.2% (n=20) from the high-intermediate risk group, and 8.7% (n=77) from the high risk group. Salvageable relapses were less frequent at 2% (n=18), of which 33% (n=6) were from the low risk group, 22% (n=4) from the intermediate risk group, 11% (n=2) from the high-intermediate risk group, and 33% (n=6) from the high risk group. There were only three asymptomatic relapses in the low risk patients, accounting for 0.33% of the entire cohort., Conclusions: Relapses were infrequent and most presented with symptoms; prognosis after relapse remains favorable. Overall salvageable relapses were infrequent and cannot justify intensive hospital based follow-up. Use of patient initiated follow-up is therefore appropriate, as per the British Gynaecological Cancer Society's guidelines, for all risk groupings., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background Radiomic features may quantify characteristics present in medical imaging. However, the lack of standardized definitions and validated reference values have hampered clinical use. Purpose To standardize a set of 174 radiomic features. Materials and Methods Radiomic features were assessed in three phases. In phase I, 487 features were derived from the basic set of 174 features. Twenty-five research teams with unique radiomics software implementations computed feature values directly from a digital phantom, without any additional image processing. In phase II, 15 teams computed values for 1347 derived features using a CT image of a patient with lung cancer and predefined image processing configurations. In both phases, consensus among the teams on the validity of tentative reference values was measured through the frequency of the modal value and classified as follows: less than three matches, weak; three to five matches, moderate; six to nine matches, strong; 10 or more matches, very strong. In the final phase (phase III), a public data set of multimodality images (CT, fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET, and T1-weighted MRI) from 51 patients with soft-tissue sarcoma was used to prospectively assess reproducibility of standardized features. Results Consensus on reference values was initially weak for 232 of 302 features (76.8%) at phase I and 703 of 1075 features (65.4%) at phase II. At the final iteration, weak consensus remained for only two of 487 features (0.4%) at phase I and 19 of 1347 features (1.4%) at phase II. Strong or better consensus was achieved for 463 of 487 features (95.1%) at phase I and 1220 of 1347 features (90.6%) at phase II. Overall, 169 of 174 features were standardized in the first two phases. In the final validation phase (phase III), most of the 169 standardized features could be excellently reproduced (166 with CT; 164 with PET; and 164 with MRI). Conclusion A set of 169 radiomics features was standardized, which enabled verification and calibration of different radiomics software. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kuhl and Truhn in this issue.

Chemoradiation increases the eligibility for sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer, as assessed by MRI., Introduction: We evaluated whether MRI can predict sphincter preservation after chemoradiation (CRT), and whether the feasibility of sphincter preservation increases after CRT, when compared with MRI before neoadjuvant treatment., Methods: 85 patients with low rectal tumour (≤5 cm from anorectal junction (ARJ)) were included. Radiologist and a surgeon measured the tumour distance to ARJ, and assigned confidence level scores (CLS) for the feasibility of sphincter preserving surgery on MRI. Reference standard was the type of surgery, sphincter preserving vs. non-preserving., Results: Tumour distance from the ARJ increased after CRT by 9 mm (p < 0.001). Eligibility for sphincter preservation increased by 21% for the radiologist and 25% for the surgeon, based on CLS. Cut-off for distance to the ARJ after CRT was 28 mm, aiming for optimal specificity. Diagnostic performance after CRT based on CLS yielded an AUC of 0.81 [95%CI 0.70-0.91] for the radiologist and 0.82 [95%CI 0.72-0.92] for the surgeon (p = 0.78). AUCs for tumour distance to the ARJ were 0.85 [95%CI 0.77-0.94] and 0.84 [95%CI 0.75-0.94], respectively (p = 0.84). Interobserver agreement for CLS was moderate before CRT (Κ 0.51; 95%CI 0.36-0.66) and after (K 0.54; 95%CI 0.39-0.69). Measurement of tumour distance to ARJ showed good agreement before (ICC 0.76; 95%CI 0.65-0.84) and after CRT (ICC 0.77; 95%CI 0.66-0.84)., Conclusion: MRI can be a valuable adjunct in the decision making for sphincter preservation after CRT, with distance from the tumour to the ARJ as an accurate and reliable factor. CRT increases the tumour distance to the ARJ, leading to an estimated increase of sphincter preserving surgery in up to 21-25% of patients., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

In this study we assessed the repeatability of radiomics features on small prostate tumors using test-retest Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI). The premise of radiomics is that quantitative image-based features can serve as biomarkers for detecting and characterizing disease. For such biomarkers to be useful, repeatability is a basic requirement, meaning its value must remain stable between two scans, if the conditions remain stable. We investigated repeatability of radiomics features under various preprocessing and extraction configurations including various image normalization schemes, different image pre-filtering, and different bin widths for image discretization. Although we found many radiomics features and preprocessing combinations with high repeatability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient > 0.85), our results indicate that overall the repeatability is highly sensitive to the processing parameters. Neither image normalization, using a variety of approaches, nor the use of pre-filtering options resulted in consistent improvements in repeatability. We urge caution when interpreting radiomics features and advise paying close attention to the processing configuration details of reported results. Furthermore, we advocate reporting all processing details in radiomics studies and strongly recommend the use of open source implementations.

Introduction The introduction of the two week rule (TWR) cancer referral system aimed to expedite the diagnosis and treatment of patients with lung cancer. There have been concerns that the system may even lead to delays and there remains little evidence to support its use. We therefore used prospective data to assess the effectiveness of this system. Methods We prospectively collected data on patients referred in 2010 with suspected lung cancer to a large West London lung cancer centre. We evaluated final diagnosis, performance status, lung cancer staging, time until seen in specialist clinic and time until first treatment for patients referred under the TWR compared with patients referred via our in-house abnormal radiology referral service. Results In total 249 patients were included in the study (181 from radiology reporting and 68 from GP referrals via the 2 week wait). 83 (33%) cancers were diagnosed from a total of 249 referrals. Patients referred from the radiology department were significantly more likely to have a diagnosis of lung cancer (73/181, 40%) than patients referred under the TWR (10/68, 15%; p<0.001). The mean time from date of referral to seeing a specialist was similar in both groups. All patients diagnosed with lung cancer referred through the TWR had an abnormal chest radiograph. More patients with a performance status 0-1 and earlier stage disease were referred from radiology than through the TWR. Conclusions A robust radiology referral system is an effective alternative method to diagnosing lung cancer than the TWR. Patients referred from radiology are significantly more likely to have lung cancer. We propose that out-patient clinic slots are reserved for urgent radiology referrals rather than all being allocated to TWR appointments amenable to direct GP bookings. More work is needed to develop this referral pathway further. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]