A new approach to finite elasto-plasticity of crystalline materials, with a differential geometry point of view toward the material description, is proposed. In order to define the plastic and elastic distortions, traditionally it is accepted the existence of an intermediate configuration, which is endowed with a differential manifold structure. A more restrictive but physically and mathematically well-motivated structure is assigned to the intermediate configuration, namely, a vector bundle structure. Two approaches to multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient can be rebuilt if on the same total space (intermediate configuration) the vector bundle structures are considered, but either the reference configuration, B (i.e., plastic assumption) or the deformed configuration, B t (i.e., elastic assumption) stands for the base space. As the base spaces are homeomorphic, a pullback vector bundle over one base space is provided by the other one through the motion diffeomorphism. Thus, the total space is endowed with different differential manifold structures. The plastic distortion and the inverse elastic distortion, respectively, are defined for any material points as linear, invertible, and non-integrable maps from the tangent vector space at their material points, with the value on the attached vector fiber. The multiplicative decompositions into their non-integrable components are derived, based on the associate inverse elastic distortion and plastic distortion, respectively. When the plastic and elastic assumptions are simultaneously accepted, then a three-term multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient is achieved. The transition functions, which characterize the compatibility of the overlapping charts which belong to these different structures, namely of the vector bundle and of the pullback vector bundle over the same configuration, say B define the non-uniqueness of the two-term multiplicative decomposition. The material symmetry transformation is defined for elastic-type materials. The compatibility of the models and examples of the bundle vector structures are also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]