Halegoua-DeMarzio D, Navarro VJ, Davis A, Ahmad J, Avula B, Barnhart H, Barritt AS 4th, Bonkovsky HL, Chen VL, Choi G, Fontana RJ, Ghabril MS, Khan I, Koh C, Odin J, Rockey DC, Rostami H, Serrano J, Sherker AH, Stolz A, Tillmann HL, and Vuppalanchi R
Background: The attribution of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) to specific herbal and dietary supplements (HDS) is confounded by inaccurate labels and undisclosed ingredients. The US Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) determines the attribution of injury to an agent through its structured expert opinion causality assessment process, but without the use of chemical analysis data of HDS. We aimed to determine the impact of chemical analysis of HDS products on prior causality assessment scores., Methods: Obtained samples of HDS consumed by DILIN-enrolled patients were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS). Chemical analysis data were compared to label accuracy and detect whether the product contained botanical and non-botanical compounds. A comparison of the causality scores reassessed with chemical analysis was compared with the original scores., Results: A total of 54 previously adjudicated cases with chemical analysis available were reassessed for causality with chemical analysis data; reviewers were blinded to original causality scores. Using the chemical analysis data, 37% (n = 20) of the 54 cases were scored with a higher likelihood of DILI compared with the original causality scores; 14 of the 20 (70%) moved from probable to highly likely; 52% had no change in causality score; and 11% of cases were scored as a lower likelihood of DILI., Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that there is value in using HDS chemical analysis data in the causality assessment process for DILI. In more than a third of cases, chemical analysis of products led to an increased confidence in DILI attribution to HDS. These findings suggest that chemical analysis is an important tool in causality assessment for HDS agents, specifically in challenging situations, and further studies are needed to confirm its applicability in clinical practice., Competing Interests: Declarations. Funding: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) of the National Institutes of Health under award nos. U01DK065211 (Indiana University), U01DK065184 (University of Michigan), U01DK065201 (University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill), U01DK083020 (University of Southern California), U01DK083027 (Thomas Jefferson University/Albert Einstein Medical Center), U01DK100928 (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai), and U24DK065176 (Duke University). Additional support is provided by the intramural programs of the NIDDK and the National Cancer Institute. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Conflicts of interest: Authors have no disclosures related to this publication. Ethics approval: This study was approved by the Advarra Institutional Review Board. Protocol title: A Multi-Center Study of Drug-and HDS-Induced Liver Injury (DILIN). Protocol approval #: Pro00072297. Approval date: 5 January 2024. All procedures performed in the study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Consent for participation: Informed consent was obtained from all patients who participated in this study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Availability of data and material data: Available upon reasonable request, following applicable regulations, by contacting the corresponding author. Code availability: Not applicable. Author contributions: All authors read and approved the final version. D.H.D. was responsible for analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content and statistical analysis; V.N. for study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, statistical analysis, obtaining funding, and study supervision; A.D. for study concept and design, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data; B.A. for analysis and interpretation of data, acquisition of data, and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; H.B. for study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, and statistical analysis; A.S.B. for study concept and design, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; J.A. for study concept and design, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; H.L.B. for study concept and design, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; V.L.C. for study concept and design, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; G.C. for study concept and design, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; R.J.F. for study concept and design, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; M.S.G. for study concept and design, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; I.A.K. for analysis and interpretation of data and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; C.K. for analysis and interpretation of data and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; J.O. for analysis and interpretation of data and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; H.R. for acquisition of data; J.S. for study concept and design, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; A.H.S. for study concept and design, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; A.S. for study concept and design, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; H.L.D. for study concept and design, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; and R.V. for study concept and design, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content., (© 2024. The Author(s).)