301. Comparison of two catheters for peritoneal access in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD)
- Author
-
Bo G. Danielson, Per Nilsson, Nils Grefberg, and J. Wahlberg
- Subjects
Tenckhoff catheter ,Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Urology ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Catheterization ,Catheters, Indwelling ,Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory ,Laparotomy ,Medicine ,Humans ,In patient ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis ,Indwelling catheters ,Middle Aged ,Surgery ,Catheter ,Nephrology ,Anesthesia ,Female ,business ,Peritoneal Dialysis - Abstract
The results obtained by means of the Tenckhoff and the Toronto Western Hospital-type (TWH) indwelling catheters for peritoneal access in patients undergoing Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis are reported. Fifty-nine Tenckhoff catheters were used for 592 months and 24 TWH-type for 220 months. One-year catheter survival was 71% in the Tenckhoff group and 77% in the TWH group. The difference does not reach statistical significance. Moreover no statistically significant differences as regards complications could be found between the two catheter types. A major disadvantage was noted with the TWH catheter: on two occasions TWH catheters could not be removed without a laparotomy, being firmly adherent to the intestine or omentum. It is concluded that the TWH catheter is not a superior alternative to the Tenckhoff catheter for peritoneal access in patients undergoing Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis.
- Published
- 1983