251. VAD or VMBCP in multiple myeloma refractory to or relapsing after cyclophosphamide-prednisone therapy (protocol MY 85).
- Author
-
Mineur P, Ménard JF, Le Loët X, Bernard JF, Grosbois B, Pollet JP, Azais I, Laporte JP, Doyen C, De Gramont A, Wetterwald M, Euller-Ziegler L, Peny AM, Monconduit M, and Michaux JL
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carmustine administration & dosage, Cyclophosphamide administration & dosage, Dexamethasone administration & dosage, Doxorubicin administration & dosage, Female, Humans, Male, Melphalan administration & dosage, Middle Aged, Prednisone administration & dosage, Prognosis, Salvage Therapy, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Vincristine administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Multiple Myeloma drug therapy
- Abstract
263 patients (median age 65+/-10 years) with multiple myeloma were treated with cyclophosphamide-prednisone. Out of this cohort, 103 patients had progressive disease and were randomly assigned to either VAD (vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone; 50 cases) or VMBCP (vincristine, BCNU, cyclophosphamide, melphalan and prednisone; 53 cases). There were no statistical differences between the two groups with the respect to clinical, biological and radiological parameters. There was no difference in survival between the VAD and VMBCP groups. The 4 months response rate was similar in the two groups (50% VAD, 56% VMBCP). With multivariate analysis for survival (Cox model), two factors had a statistically significant impact: Karnofsky index (> 60) and albuminaemia (< 34 g/l). With both Karnofsky index > 60 and albuminaemia > or = 34 g/l, the median survival was 29 months v 2 months with a Karnofsky index < or = 60 and albuminaemia < 34 g/l (P<0.05). In conclusion, VAD or VMBCP had similar activity for salvage treatment in MM refractory or relapsing to first-line treatment with cyclophosphamide-prednisone.
- Published
- 1998
- Full Text
- View/download PDF