Search

Background: The relative impact on renal allograft outcome of specific histological diagnoses versus nonspecific chronic histological damage remains unclear., Methods: All 1,197 renal allograft recipients who were transplanted at a single center between 1991 and 2001 were included. All posttransplant renal allograft indication biopsies performed in this cohort during follow-up (mean, 14.5±2.80 years after transplantation) were rescored according to the current histological criteria and associated with death-censored graft outcome., Results: In this cohort, 1,365 allograft indication biopsies were performed. Specific diagnoses were present in 69.4% of graft biopsies before graft loss, but 30.6% of grafts did not have specific diagnoses in the last biopsy before graft loss. Only 14.6% of the patients did never have any specific disease diagnosed before graft loss. Extensive interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy without a clear cause was identified as the single cause of graft loss in only 6.9% of the cases. Acute T-cell-mediated rejection and changes suggestive of acute antibody-mediated rejection, diagnosed after the first year posttransplant, associated independently with graft survival. Transplant glomerulopathy increased over time after transplantation and represented a major risk for graft loss, as well as de novo or recurrent glomerular pathologies and polyomavirus nephropathy. Chronic histological injury associated with graft outcome, independent of specific diagnoses., Conclusion: Renal allograft loss is multifactorial. Chronic histological damage and specific diseases had additive and independent impact on graft outcome. Chronic damage should be taken into account in prognostication of renal allograft outcome and could be implemented in treatment algorithms for specific diseases of kidney allografts.