301. Are Deaf Students Visual Learners?
- Author
-
Marc Marschark, Carol Convertino, Georgianna Borgna, Jennifer Lukomski, and Carolyn Morrison
- Subjects
Social Psychology ,genetic structures ,Spatial ability ,education ,Cognition ,Sign language ,Affect (psychology) ,Article ,Education ,Developmental psychology ,Task (project management) ,Developmental and Educational Psychology ,ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION ,otorhinolaryngologic diseases ,Auditory deprivation ,Psychology ,Cognitive psychology ,Cognitive style - Abstract
It is frequently assumed that by virtue of their hearing losses, deaf students are visual learners. Deaf individuals have some visual–spatial advantages relative to hearing individuals, but most have been linked to use of sign language rather than auditory deprivation. How such cognitive differences might affect academic performance has been investigated only rarely. This study examined relations among deaf college students' language and visual–spatial abilities, mathematics problem solving, and hearing thresholds. Results extended some previous findings and clarified others. Contrary to what might be expected, hearing students exhibited visual–spatial skills equal to or better than deaf students. Scores on a Spatial Relations task were associated with better mathematics problem solving. Relations among the several variables, however, suggested that deaf students are no more likely to be visual learners than hearing students and that their visual–spatial skill may be related more to their hearing losses than to their sign language skills.
- Published
- 2013