Editor—The editorial by Baker et al highlights the nonsensical way in which psychiatric and neurological disorders and the doctors who look after them have been divided over the past 100 years and how modern neuroscience is bringing them closer together again.1-1 Where is the wall between the two specialties at its thickest? Not in academic research, where distinctions between mind and brain in schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease, and depression are already largely abandoned. Perhaps in training? It is true that opportunities for a neurologist to gain psychiatric skills (and a psychiatrist to gain neurological skills)—in the United Kingdom and United States anyway—are limited and the scope for improvement is huge. But generally a patient with Parkinson's disease who also has delusional disorder will receive attention and treatment. Similarly, psychiatrists continue to look for neurological disease in their patients much more often than they find it. The thickest part of the wall and the greatest challenge to these two disciplines is in the area of functional neurological symptoms or neurological symptoms unexplained by disease. Freud, cited in the article as a prototypical neuropsychiatrist, was initially a neurologist, but he abandoned the clinicopathological model to explain hysteria. It was this proposal that drove the greatest schism between mind and brain 100 years ago. Up to one third of all new neurology outpatients have symptoms such as dizziness, numbness, pain, weakness, and blackouts that are neither explained by disease nor “functional.” Neither neurology nor psychiatry is particularly interested in them, and basic neuroscience has made only embryonic inroads into their understanding. Important aspects of functional neurological symptoms, such as illness beliefs and the interaction of cultural factors, may forever remain outside the reach of the scanner. To break down the wall truly, neurology and psychiatry must not simply focus on those symptoms where biology has permitted dialogue. In the 19th century physicians of nervous disorders brought important social, psychological, and biological perspectives to the symptoms they observed. Let's hope in our rush to examine the brains of our patients we do not forget to listen to what they are saying.