301. Comparison of risk of malignancy and predictive value of diagnostic categories defined by Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology system and WHO reporting system for pancreaticobiliary cytopathology in solid pancreatic lesions.
- Author
-
Vasas B, Fábián A, Bősze Z, Hamar S, Kaizer L, Tóth T, Bacsur P, Resál T, Bálint A, Farkas K, Molnár T, Szepes Z, and Bor R
- Abstract
Background: The standardized diagnostic categories defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) reporting system support the interdisciplinary interpretation of cytological findings in the management of pancreatic cancer., Objective: To compare this classification to the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) system in terms of predictive value and risk of malignancy (ROM) in solid pancreatic lesions., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Methods: All consecutive patients with solid pancreatic lesions who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) sampling at the University of Szeged from 2014 to 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. The predictive value and ROM of cytological findings were determined with comparison to histologic outcome and/or clinical follow-up., Results: A total of 521 EUS-FNAs were performed with a malignancy rate of 81.76%. In both classification systems, the absolute ROM of "non-diagnostic," "negative for malignancy," "atypical," "suspicious for malignancy," and "malignant" categories were 48.2%, 2.3%, 78.1%, 100.0%, and 99.4%, respectively. Despite the heterogeneous nature of the "neoplastic: other" category of the PSC system, the absolute ROM for solid lesions was 100%. Pancreatic neoplasm: high-risk/grade category including only two endosonographically solid cases of high-grade intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms showed 100% ROM. There were no differences between PSC and WHO systems in sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values: excluding the "atypical" category, these were 99.7%, 95.6%, 97.7%, and 99.5%, respectively. The "atypical" category considered benign resulted in a higher decrease in validity and negative predictive value, compared to "atypical" considered true malignant (93.6% vs 97.7% and 65.8% vs 97.7%)., Conclusion: For solid pancreatic lesions, the WHO system was identical to the PSC system in terms of ROM and predictive values., Competing Interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s), 2024.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF