301. Recommendations for planning and delivery of radical radiotherapy for localized urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.
- Author
-
Khalifa, Jonathan, Supiot, Stéphane, Pignot, Géraldine, Hennequin, Christophe, Blanchard, Pierre, Pasquier, David, Magné, Nicolas, de Crevoisier, Renaud, Graff-Cailleaud, Pierre, Riou, Olivier, Cabaillé, Morgane, Azria, David, Latorzeff, Igor, Créhange, Gilles, Chapet, Olivier, Rouprêt, Morgan, Belhomme, Sarah, Mejean, Arnaud, Culine, Stéphane, and Sargos, Paul
- Subjects
- *
BLADDER cancer , *TRANSITIONAL cell carcinoma , *COMPUTED tomography , *IMAGE-guided radiation therapy , *BLADDER , *RADIOTHERAPY - Abstract
• Homogenized guidelines for bladder radiotherapy were needed in literature. • A technical consensus for radiotherapy of bladder cancer is presented. • Planning acquisition, PTV margins and lymph-nodes radiotherapy are controversial. • Practical recommendations are available for the implementation of novel techniques. Curative radio-chemotherapy is recognized as a standard treatment option for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Nevertheless, the technical aspects for MIBC radiotherapy are heterogeneous with a lack of practical recommendations. In 2018, a workshop identified the need for two cooperative groups to develop consistent, evidence-based guidelines for irradiation technique in the delivery of curative radiotherapy. Two radiation oncologists performed a review of the literature addressing several topics relative to radical bladder radiotherapy: planning computed tomography acquisition, target volume delineation, radiation schedules (total dose and fractionation) and dose delivery (including radiotherapy techniques, image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and adaptive treatment modalities). Searches for original and review articles in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases were conducted from January 1990 until March 2020. During a meeting conducted in October 2020, results on 32 topics were presented and discussed with a working group involving 15 radiation oncologists, 3 urologists and one medical oncologist. We applied the American Urological Association guideline development's method to define a consensus strategy. A consensus was obtained for all 34 except 4 items. The group did not obtain an agreement on CT enhancement added value for planning, PTV margins definition for empty bladder and full bladder protocols, and for pelvic lymph-nodes irradiation. High quality evidence was shown in 6 items; 8 items were considered as low quality of evidence. The current recommendations propose a homogenized modality of treatment both for routine clinical practice and for future clinical trials, following the best evidence to date, analyzed with a robust methodology. The XXX group formulates practical guidelines for the implementation of innovative techniques such as adaptive radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF