Search

Purpose: Although several new chemotherapeutic agents are promising as primary therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), few have demonstrated activity in platinum-refractory disease. Based on encouraging results reported in two single-institution studies of docetaxel in this setting, we performed a multicenter phase II trial evaluating this novel taxane in previously treated NSCLC patients prospectively categorized by platinum response status., Patients and Methods: Eighty patients with NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy received docetaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) intravenously over 1 hour, repeated every 21 days, accompanied by dexamethasone 8 mg orally twice daily for 5 days. Forty-seven patients (59%) were defined as platinum-refractory based on response status to prior therapy., Results: The median number of cycles delivered per patient was four (range, one to 21 cycles). Partial response was observed in 13 (16%) of 80 of patients, with similar response rates in platinum-sensitive and platinum-refractory patients. The median survival time was 7 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 25%. Docetaxel was relatively well tolerated in this previously treated population. Grade IV neutropenia was common in patients (77%) but typically of brief duration. Febrile neutropenia was observed in 11 patients (14%), with no fatal infections. Severe fluid retention was rare (4% of patients)., Conclusions: This multicenter phase II trial confirms antitumor activity and encouraging survival with docetaxel therapy in platinum-treated and platinum-refractory NSCLC. To validate these results, a phase III trial randomizing platinum-treated patients to docetaxel or best supportive care is underway.

Background: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) conducted sequential Phase II multicenter trials to evaluate the activity of edatrexate alone (E) or with leucovorin rescue (EL) in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (CALGB Protocol 9131)., Methods: Twenty patients were accrued to the E portion of the study and received edatrexate, 80 mg/m(2), intravenously over 20-30 minutes weekly. After a protocol amendment precipitated by excessive toxic events with E, 40 patients were enrolled in the EL arm and received the same dose of edatrexate with leucovorin, 15 mg orally, every 6 hours for 4 doses beginning 24 hours after edatrexate. Eligibility criteria included a CALGB performance status of 0-2 and no prior chemotherapy. A central pathology review was performed. Of the 58 patients included in this analysis (20 receiving E and 38 receiving EL), 36 had epithelial cell type and 22 had mixed or sarcomatous cell types. There were 31 patients with measurable disease and 27 with evaluable disease., Results: The overall response rate was 25% for E (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 9-49%) and 16% for EL (95% CI, 6-31%). There was a 5% complete response [CR] rate, a 10% partial response [PR] rate, and a 10% regression [R] rate for E and a 0% CR rate, a 3% PR rate, and a 13% R rate for EL. The median survival duration from study entry was 9.6 months and 6.6 months, respectively, for E and EL; 1-year survival was 50% and 32%, respectively, for E and EL. There were four early deaths with the E regimen (including two from neutropenic sepsis) and one early death with the EL regimen (from progressive disease). Principal toxicities included mu cositis, myelosuppression, and rash, which were less frequent with leucovorin rescue., Conclusions: Moderate antitumor activity has been observed with both regimens. Leucovorin rescue ameliorated the mucosal, hematologic, and dermatologic toxicities of edatrexate, but also may have reduced its efficacy., (Copyright 1999 American Cancer Society.)

We examined the safety and efficacy of the docetaxel/cisplatin combination in patients with advanced, previously untreated NSCLC and evaluated changes in quality of life over time. Docetaxel was administered before cisplatin (both 75 mg/m2, 1-hour infusions) every 3 weeks to 47 patients with stage IIIB or stage IV NSCLC. Patients also received premedication of oral dexamethasone. The median age (range) of patients was 62 (45-78) years and 26 patients (55.3%) had adenocarcinoma. Of the 40 patients evaluable for response, one achieved a complete response and 14 had partial responses; the response rate was 37.5% (95% confidence intervals; 22.5, 52.5). In the intent-to-treat population the overall response rate was 31.9%. Time to response ranged from 3 to 20 weeks, and the median duration of response was 34.6 weeks. Median survival and median time to progression were 11.3 months and 18.9 weeks, respectively. One-year survival was 40%. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were observed in 74.4% and 12.8% of patients, respectively. Severe asthenia was seen in 14.9% of patients. Other grade 3 or 4 toxicities included nausea (eight patients), vomiting (five), neurosensory effects (six), neuromotor effects (five), diarrhea (four), and infection (three). There was an improvement in emotional well-being; however, the overall quality of life score did not change with treatment. Docetaxel administered in combination with cisplatin is an active regimen in patients with NSCLC. This regimen of docetaxel (75 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2) repeated at 3-week intervals is being evaluated in an ongoing Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) randomized study in patients with advanced and metastatic NSCLC.

The options for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were expanded by the introduction of the taxanes. As a single agent, docetaxel produced response rates ranging from 15 to 22% in evaluable patients in the second-line setting, with median duration of responses ranging from 5.6 to 7.5 months. To confirm the results observed in the phase II studies, a phase III trial was conducted. Three-hundred and seventy-three patients with advanced NSCLC who had failed prior platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized to receive docetaxel 100 mg/m2, docetaxel 75 mg/m2 or a reference arm consisting of vinorelbine or ifosfamide. Efficacy, safety and quality of life (using the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale) were assessed. Data from this study are forthcoming and may confirm the benefits provided by the inclusion of docetaxel in the second-line treatment of NSCLC. Docetaxel is also an active single agent in the first-line setting, with response rates ranging from 24 to 38% in evaluable patients, with a median survival of 6-13 months. Based on the single-agent activity, it was logical to evaluate the efficacy of docetaxel in combination with other active agents. As such, docetaxel has been studied in with numerous other agents such as vinorelbine, gemcitabine, platinums, etc. Notably cisplatin and carboplatin has shown promising rates of response and response duration in phase II trials. These combinations have now entered randomized phase III study.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for palliating obstructing esophageal cancer. This report reviews our initial experience using PDT to treat malignant dysphagia. Patients with inoperable, obstructing esophageal cancer were considered for PDT. Photofrin was injected 48 hours before endoscopic laser activation. Dysphagia score was assessed. Thirty patients underwent 53 PDT courses. Improvement in dysphagia occurred in 83%. Mean dysphagia score decreased from 2.8 to 1.8 (p < 0.05). Complications included esophageal stricture (9.4%), candida esophagitis (5.7%), symptomatic pleural effusion (5.7%), contained esophageal perforation (1.9%), aspiration pneumonia (1.9%), and sunburn (13.2%). Seventeen patients (57%) required more than one PDT treatment, and in 10 an expandable metal stent was used as an adjunct. The 30-day mortality rate was 7%. PDT is effective in palliating patients with malignant dysphagia. The ideal patient for PDT has an obstructing, primarily endoluminal esophageal tumor with minimal extrinsic compression.

The combination of docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) with cisplatin is feasible, has manageable toxicity, and is active in stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer. The four phase II trials completed to date show response rates ranging from 32% to 48% and median survival durations of 8 to 13 months. Based on these results, regimens combining 75 to 100 mg/m2 docetaxel with 75 to 100 mg/m2 cisplatin are now being assessed in randomized phase III comparisons with platinum-containing combinations. The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin also has promising activity, with response rates of 48% (1 complete response and 12 partial responses) seen in 27 evaluable patients. Overall, this combination is also well tolerated. However, it will be necessary to use both docetaxel/platinum regimens at earlier stages in the disease if a significant impact is to be made on survival.

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in industrialized countries. Efforts toward the development of new cytotoxic drugs and more active combination regimens for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are ongoing. Nevertheless, specific targeting of malignant cells poses a major challenge; toxicities of normal tissues continue to be dose limiting. Cytoprotective agents, such as amifostine (Ethyol; Alza Pharmaceuticals, Palo Alto, CA/US Bioscience, West Conshohocken, PA), that can shield normal tissues from cytotoxic effects are now the subject of intense clinical investigation. Amifostine has been shown to selectively protect normal tissues when used in combination with a large number of chemotherapeutic agents, including cisplatin, carboplatin, and paclitaxel. The addition of amifostine to paclitaxel or carboplatin has been shown to reduce the dose-limiting toxicities associated with each chemotherapeutic agent. However, now the combination regimen of carboplatin/paclitaxel is commonly used in NSCLC. To improve the tolerance of this regimen, a large, phase III, multicenter, randomized trial has been initiated that compares carboplatin/paclitaxel with or without amifostine in patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC. The main objective is to evaluate the impact of amifostine on myelotoxicity and neurotoxicity. The addition of cytoprotective agents such as amifostine to other active NSCLC regimens may also reduce overall toxicity and improve the therapeutic index.

Combined chemotherapy and thoracic radiation therapy has emerged as a primary treatment option for locally advanced, unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Randomized trials and subsequent metaanalyses have shown a clear survival benefit with platinum-based combination chemotherapy administered sequentially or concurrently with hyperfractionated thoracic radiation over radiation alone. Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) and carboplatin recently have been evaluated in numerous phase 1/11 trials at various doses in both sequential and concurrent schedules with thoracic radiation in patients with locally advanced and unresectable NSCLC. The patterns of failure in patients treated with concurrent paclitaxel/carboplatin and thoracic radiation suggest the need for additional chemotherapy either at the front end or after completion of the concurrent regimen. A large multicenter randomized study (Locally Advanced Multimodality Protocol) has been initiated to address these issues of improvement in distant control and to further refine the combined-modality approach for patients with locally advanced NSCLC. Several other combined-modality regimens incorporating a platinum compound and a novel agent like gemcitabine, vinorelbine, paclitaxel, or docetaxel have been recently completed or are in progress. The hope for the immediate future is to define an "effective" and "optimal" regimen that can be given simultaneously with thoracic radiation and can result in improved local and systemic control in patients with regionally advanced NSCLC. Numerous phase II and III trials are currently planned or under way to further define the efficacy of this novel combination of paclitaxel/carboplatin in combined-modality programs in an attempt to determine the optimal administration sequence of chemotherapy and thoracic radiation. These combined-modality programs are now being integrated into trials for early stage, potentially resectable disease. Thus, NSCLC is in fact a systemic disease requiring a multidisciplinary approach for optimal management.

Purpose: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose of paclitaxel with carboplatin with and without filgrastim support in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to investigate the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and carboplatin and correlate these with the pharmacodynamic effects., Patients and Methods: Thirty-six chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic NSCLC were entered into this phase I dose-escalation and pharmacokinetic study. Paclitaxel was initially administered as a 24-hour infusion at a fixed dose of 135 mg/m2, and the carboplatin dose was escalated in cohorts of three patients, using Calvert's formula [dose(mg) = area under the concentration time curve (glomerular filtration rate + 25)], to target areas under the concentration time curve (AUCs) of 5, 7, 9, and 11 mg/mL x minute. A measured 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance was substituted for the glomerular filtration rate. Once the maximum-tolerated AUC (MTAUC) of carboplatin was reached, the paclitaxel dose was escalated to 175, 200, and 225 mg/m2. When the paclitaxel dose escalation began, the AUC of carboplatin was reduced to one level below the MTAUC., Results: Myelosuppression was the major dose-limiting toxicity. Thrombocytopenia was observed at a carboplatin AUC of 11 mg/mL x minute after course 2 and thereafter. End-of-infusion plasma paclitaxel concentrations and median duration of time above 0.05 microM were similar in course 1 versus course 2 at the 135 and 175 mg/m2 dose levels. The neutropenia experienced by patients was consistent with that observed in patients who had received paclitaxel alone. Measured carboplatin AUCs were approximately 12% (20% v 3% with course 1 v course 2, respectively) below the desired target, with a standard deviation of 34% at all dose levels. A sigmoid-maximum effect model describing the relationship between relative thrombocytopenia and measured free platinum exposure indicated that patients who received the combination of carboplatin with paclitaxel experienced less severe thrombocytopenia than would be expected from carboplatin alone. Of the 36 patients entered onto the study, one experienced a complete response and 17 had partial responses, for an overall response rate of 50%. The recommended doses of paclitaxel (24-hour infusion) and carboplatin for future phase II studies of this combination are (1) paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 with a carboplatin dose targeted to achieve an AUC of 7 mg/mL x minute without filgrastim support; (2) paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 with a carboplatin dose targeted to achieve an AUC of 9 mg/mL x minute with filgrastim support; and (3) paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 with a carboplatin dose targeted to achieve an AUC of 7 mg/mL x minute with filgrastim support., Conclusion: The regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin is well-tolerated and has promising activity in the treatment of NSCLC. There is no pharmacokinetic interaction between paclitaxel and carboplatin, but there is a pharmacodynamic, platelet-sparing effect on this dose-limiting toxicity of carboplatin.

A five-field conformal technique with three-dimensional radiation therapy treatment planning (3-DRTP) has been shown to permit better definition of the target volume for lung cancer, while minimizing the normal tissue volume receiving greater than 50% of the target dose. In an initial study to confirm the safety of conventional doses, we used the five-field conformal 3-DRTP technique. We then used the technique in a second study, enhancing the therapeutic index in a series of 42 patients, as well as to evaluate feasibility, survival outcome, and treatment toxicity. Forty-two consecutive patients with nonsmall-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) were evaluated during the years 1993-1997. The median age was 60 years (range 34-80). The median radiation therapy (RT) dose to the gross tumor volume was 6,300 cGy (range 5,000-6,840 cGy) delivered over 6 to 6.5 weeks in 180-275 cGy daily fractions, 5 days per week. There were three patients who received a split course treatment of 5,500 cGy in 20 fractions, delivering 275 cGy daily with a 2-week break built into the treatment course after 10 fractions. The stages of disease were II in 2%, IIIA in 40%, IIIB in 42.9%, and recurrent disease in 14.3% of the patients. The mean tumor volume was 324.14 cc (range 88.3-773.7 cc); 57.1% of the patients received combined chemoradiotherapy, while the others were treated with radiation therapy alone. Of the 42 patients, 7 were excluded from the final analysis because of diagnosis of distant metastasis during treatment. Two of the patients had their histology reinterpreted as being other than NSCLC, 2 patients did not complete RT at the time of analysis, and 1 patient voluntarily discontinued treatment because of progressive deterioration. Median follow-up was 11.2 months (range 3-32.5 months). Survival for patients with Stage III disease was 70.2% at 1 year and 51.5% at 2 years, with median survival not yet reached. Local control for the entire series was 23.3+/-11.4% at 2 years. However, for Stage III patients, local control was 50% at 1 year and 30% at 2 years. Patients who received concurrent chemotherapy had significantly improved survival (P = 0.002) and local control (P = 0.004), compared with RT alone. Late esophageal toxicity of > or =Grade 3 occurred in 14.1+/-9.3% of patients (3 of 20) receiving combined chemoradiotherapy, but in none of the 15 patients treated with RT alone. Pulmonary toxicity limited to Grades 1-2 occurred in 6.8% of the patients, and none developed > or =Grade 3 pulmonary toxicity. Patients with locally advanced NSCLC, who commonly have tumor volumes in excess of 200 cc, presenta challenge for adequate dose delivery without significant toxicity. Our five-field conformal 3-DRTP technique, which incorporates treatment planning by dose/volume histogram (DVH) was associated with minimal toxicity and may facilitate dose escalation to the gross tumor.

The options available to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resistant or refractory to first-line chemotherapy are very limited. The older-generation drugs (etoposide, vindesine, epirubicin, and cisplatin) that are active against previously untreated NSCLC do not achieve a response rate greater than 10% when used in the second-line setting. The newer-generation agents with activity in previously untreated NSCLC include carboplatin, paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and irinotecan. Although NSCLC remains relatively resistant to chemotherapy, the fact that second-line chemotherapy is being considered is tribute to the progress being made with first-line therapy. The taxanes have clearly become the agents of the 1990s. The activity of paclitaxel in the second-line setting is not well-defined, and the response rates have ranged from 0% to 3 31% using various schedules. However, docetaxel achieved response rates of 15% to 22% in five phase II trials, with a clinically meaningful survival rate of 25% at 1 year in one of the studies. Randomized trials of docetaxel versus best supportive care and of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide are in progress. The efficacy of vinorelbine and irinotecan in the second-line setting have been dismal. Gemcitabine demonstrated a response rate of 25% in a recently reported trial and needs further investigation. Further progress may come from a wider investigation of novel agents and their combination with biological and other selective therapies.

Chemotherapeutic intervention in advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has changed over the past 2 decades. The improvements offered by cisplatin (Platinol)-based regimens, though significant in terms of survival and quality of life, were modest at best. Carboplatin (Paraplatin), which possesses a toxicity profile favorable to that of its parent analogue cisplatin, yielded survival rates superior to that of the cisplatin-combination chemotherapy arms in a large randomized study of patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. With the introduction of taxanes in the early 1990s, paclitaxel (Taxol) demonstrated single-agent activity of 21% to 24%, with a 40% 1-year survival rate in metastatic disease. The next generation of phase I/II studies evaluated the efficacy of paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin. Results with this regimen have shown substantial promise, and 1-year survival rates as high as 54% have been reported. Full doses of both agents have been combined without any additional toxicity, and there appears to be a dose-response effect with paclitaxel. The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin has been incorporated as the investigational arm of all the ongoing multicenter and cooperative group studies. While the results from these randomized studies are awaited, this combination has become the most widely used regimen in community practice for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. It is also being evaluated for treatment at earlier disease stages, in the setting of minimal tumor burden, and in combined-modality regimens.

Malignant pleural effusions are associated with significant morbidity. Prompt clinical evaluation followed by aggressive treatment often results in successful palliation. This report summarizes the traditional and experimental approaches used in the management of malignant pleural effusion and provides an attempt at analysis of cost comparison and resource utilization associated with the use of various sclerosing agents. The standard sclerotherapy for malignant pleural effusions has routinely been performed as an inpatient procedure using a large-bore chest tube for drainage and instillation of a sclerosing agent. Use of a small-bore catheter for drainage and pleurodesis is associated with reduced patient discomfort and appears to be feasible and equally efficacious in the ambulatory setting. Results with the ambulatory procedure are preliminary but promising. Future comparisons with the traditional approach will allow therapy to be based not only on efficacy, but also on the use and expense of related resources.

Irradiation therapy for lung cancer is mostly restricted to conventional methods. To improve therapeutic ratio, we have combined a treatment planning and a gene therapy approach. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is described as carried out by methods of gene therapy for radiation protection using the manganese-superoxide-dismutase transgene delivered by inhalation gene transfer. These methods may improve therapeutic outcomes in lung cancer.

The role of multimodality management in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to evolve and is a subject of ongoing clinical research. Induction chemotherapy followed by surgical resection with or without thoracic radiotherapy has proved superior to surgical resection alone in patients with ipsilateral mediastinal (N2) disease. Whether surgery alone still plays a role in these patients is the subject of an ongoing intergroup study. As no definitive, optimal effective chemotherapy regimen currently exists for NSCLC, future studies will attempt to incorporate novel and active agents like the taxanes, irinotecan, vinorelbine, and gemcitabine into combined-modality therapy for locally advanced NSCLC. Thoracic radiation therapy by itself provides local control and effective palliation of tumor-related symptoms but has minimal impact on the survival of patients with locally advanced disease. Novel schemes such as hyperfractionated radiotherapy and continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy are currently being investigated and appear promising but need to be tested in combination with chemotherapeutic agents. Randomized studies have demonstrated the benefit of concurrent or sequential chemoradiation in selected patients with a good performance status and minimal weight loss. The exact sequence of combined-modality therapy has yet to be determined. The combination of paclitaxel and platinum compounds has shown impressive activity in advanced NSCLC in both phase II and III randomized studies. We have incorporated weekly low-dose paclitaxel and carboplatin with concurrent thoracic radiation in treating patients with locally advanced, inoperable NSCLC, and long-term follow-up has shown remarkable survival rates. Confirmation of these phase II combined-modality studies is needed. Combination sequential chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation in patients with advanced NSCLC has the potential to improve overall survival by increasing both local and distant control.

Eighteen patients with esophageal carcinoma (16 adenocarcinoma, two squamous cell carcinoma) were treated with two cycles of induction chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) 175 mg/m2 (3-hour infusion), cisplatin 20 mg/m2/d x 4 days, and 5-fluorouracil 1 g/m2/d (continuous infusion x 4 days) separated by a 28-day interval before surgical resection. After resection, patients received two more cycles of the same regimen. A thorough staging evaluation was performed before patients were enrolled in the study. The salient chemotherapy toxicities included grade 3 nausea (two patients), grade 3 vomiting (two patients), grades 3 and 4 diarrhea (one patient each), and grades 3 and 4 neutropenia (two and 10 patients, respectively). No deaths occurred due to toxicity. Surgical resection was attempted in all 18 patients (100%) after two cycles of induction chemotherapy. Esophageal resection was successfully completed in 17 patients. Liver metastases were noted at laparotomy in the one patient who subsequently did not undergo esophageal resection. Surgical complications were minor, and no postoperative deaths occurred. Fifteen patients received two additional cycles of the paclitaxel/5-fluorouracil/cisplatin regimen postoperatively, two received only one cycle, and one refused further therapy. Of 15 patients alive, 14 show no evidence of disease. The 1-year actuarial survival rate of this group of patients is 82%. In conclusion, the paclitaxel/5-fluorouracil/cisplatin combination is well tolerated and is an active regimen in esophageal carcinoma.

Background: Conventional noninvasive staging of esophageal cancer is inaccurate. This study investigated the role of positron emission tomography (PET) in staging esophageal cancer., Methods: Patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer were included. A whole-body PET scan was acquired after injection of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and was evaluated for areas of increased focal uptake. Accuracy was determined by comparing PET with surgical staging., Results: Potentially resectable esophageal cancer was identified in 35 patients. Positron emission tomography detected nine sites of distant metastases missed by conventional scanning, but one false-negative PET scan occurred in a patient with a 2-mm liver lesion. There were 11 false-negative PET scans for small, intracapsular local-regional nodal metastases (mean diameter 5.2 mm; range 2 to 10 mm). For distant metastases, the sensitivity was 88%, the specificity was 93%, and the accuracy was 91%. For local-regional nodal metastases, the sensitivity was 45%, the specificity was 100%, and the accuracy was 48%., Conclusions: Positron emission tomography improved our ability to detect distant metastases missed by conventional noninvasive staging of esophageal cancer. Small local-regional nodal metastases are not identified by current PET technology. Early use of PET in the staging of patients with esophageal cancer could facilitate treatment planning and identifying unsuspected distant metastases in up to 20% of patients with a negative metastatic survey by conventional staging.

Until recently, chemotherapeutic intervention in advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been viewed with a certain degree of nihilism. Although meta-analysis of randomized clinical studies from the 1970s and 1980s comparing cisplatin-based chemotherapy to best supportive care in metastatic NSCLC showed improvement in survival, it was modest at best. A number of novel agents have been developed with significant activity against NSCLC in the past 5 to 6 years and are being incorporated into the therapy of this disease. These agents include paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and irinotecan. Clearly there has been improvement in response rates, and in some cases the responses have been durable with an increase in the number of 1- and 2-year survivors. The next generation of studies has evaluated combinations of these novel agents with either cisplatin or carboplatin for patients with NSCLC and the results have been provocative, with 1-year survival rates as high as 54%. A randomized phase III study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group has shown the superiority of paclitaxel-cisplatin regimens over etoposide-cisplatin for patients with advanced and metastatic NSCLC. The vinorelbine-cisplatin regimen has also proven to have significant, albeit modest benefit in survival when compared with cisplatin alone. These combination regimens have now become the reference regimens in ongoing randomized studies. There is continued interest in developing new agents, or selective approaches that effect novel targets with the hope of showing improved therapeutic activity. Some of these approaches include gene therapy, monoclonal antibodies, and introduction of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. With better understanding of the molecular and cellular biology of lung cancer, the hope for the future is to combine the mechanistic approaches with new drug development to define an effective, optimal, and definitive regimen for NSCLC.

Docetaxel (Taxotere) is a semisynthetic taxoid that possesses significant activity as a single agent in the treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. In previously untreated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, 100 mg/m2 of docetaxel administered as an intravenous infusion over 1 hour once every 3 weeks produced response rates that ranged from 21% to 38% and median survivals of 25.2 to 47.0 weeks. In patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who had previously failed cisplatin (Platinol)-based chemotherapy, docetaxel produced median response rates of 20% to 21% and median survival of 28 to 42 weeks. This review summarizes results from key phase I and II studies demonstrating the antitumor activity and tolerability of docetaxel combined with platinum compounds for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Phase I trials determined that 75 mg/m2 of docetaxel and 75 mg/m2 of cisplatin is the recommended dose for phase II and III trials. Overall, response rates with docetaxel and cisplatin have ranged from 21% to 48% and median survival of 8 to 13 months has been achieved in phase II trials. Regarding docetaxel and carboplatin, results from phase I trials in patients with nonhematologic solid tumors indicate that this combination is well tolerated. The maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel in combination with carboplatin (target area under the time-concentration curve of 6 mg/mL.min) is 90 mg/m2 without granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) (filgrastim [Neupogen]) support and 100 mg/m2 with G-CSF support. The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin is presently being evaluated in a multicenter phase II study for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Based on superior results observed with combined-modality therapy over radiotherapy alone and on the authors' previous work with carboplatin and standard daily thoracic radiotherapy in patients with advanced, unresectable non-small cell lung cancer, a phase II study was designed to incorporate radiosensitizing doses of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) into the carboplatin/radiotherapy regimen, to improve the therapeutic index and define the toxicities. Thirty-two patients have been entered. Paclitaxel 45 mg/m2/wk was administered over 3 hours prior to carboplatin (100 mg/m2/wk) and thoracic radiotherapy (1.8 Gy/d 5 days a week; total dose, 60 to 65 Gy). No grade 4 toxicities occurred. Seven patients had chemotherapy doses delayed because of grade 3 neutropenia, and one patient had grade 3 mucositis/esophagitis that required hospitalization. Median survival has not yet been reached, and all patients are being followed. These preliminary data demonstrate the feasibility of combined concurrent chemoradiotherapy, with acceptable toxicities. Further investigation is needed to optimize carboplatin dosage with adaptive control using formulas based on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Full-dose induction chemotherapy regimens to maximize the systemic effects of chemotherapy should precede concurrent chemoradiotherapy in future studies.

Given their known activity against non-small cell lung cancer, paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) and carboplatin were combined in this phase I study of patients with metastatic disease to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicity of the combination. The initial dose of paclitaxel was fixed at 135 mg/m2 given as a 24-hour infusion with carboplatin administered in escalating doses in cohorts using Calvert's formula-dose (mg) = target AUC x (GFR + 25), where AUC is area under the concentration-time curve and GFR is glomerular filtration rate-based on target AUCs of 5, 7, 9, or 11 mg/mL.min. Dose escalations were based on cycle 1 toxicities. Filgrastim was not administered with the first cycle until two or more patients developed grade 4 or febrile neutropenia at the preceding dose level. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in two patients at level 2 (cycle 1), and filgrastim was administered thereafter for the next four dose levels. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was seen at level 4; thus, the carboplatin dose was de-escalated thereafter, and the paclitaxel dose escalated. Rare nonhematologic toxicities include fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea and vomiting. Among the first 30 patients, one had a complete response and 14 had partial responses, for an overall response rate of 50%. The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin is active in non-small cell lung cancer, and the recommended phase II dose without filgrastim support is paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 via a 24-hour infusion with the carboplatin dose targeted to achieve an AUC of 7 mg/ mL.min.

The clinical spectrum of hypersensitivity reactions reported with paclitaxel has not included the occurrence of pulmonary infiltrates. This report describes three patients who developed transient pulmonary infiltrates after receiving paclitaxel. These infiltrates were noted 2 days to 2 weeks after administration of paclitaxel. The infiltrates resolved spontaneously in all the patients but one of them did receive steroid therapy. This syndrome of transient pulmonary infiltrates did not reoccur in the two patients who were rechallenged with paclitaxel. Physicians should be made aware of this unique occurrence during the course of treatment with paclitaxel.

Sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy offer considerable improvements in the care of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Improved survival for lung cancer and organ preservation in head and neck cancer have occurred with this approach, but local control remains a problem. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy can potentially improve both local control and control of micrometastases. We previously showed that concurrent carboplatin plus radiotherapy is a useful potential treatment for advanced NSCLC and SCCHN, producing good local control and acceptable toxicity. Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) has recently demonstrated strong single-agent activity against both NSCLC and SCCHN. Paclitaxel has also shown favorable interactions with radiotherapy and with platinum compounds. We therefore added weekly paclitaxel at 45 mg/m2 given after premedication and before carboplatin (100 mg/m2) weekly during concurrent standard-dose radiotherapy. Twenty patients (seven with SCCHN and 13 with NSCLC) have been treated (38 and 73 weekly doses, respectively). Toxicities have been manageable with delay or dose reduction in five and eight patients, respectively, for SCCHN and NSCLC. Based on these toxicities paclitaxel dose has been reduced to 40 mg/m2/wk. Plasma pharmacokinetics have shown that concurrent carboplatin and radiotherapy do not alter the pharmacokinetic behavior of paclitaxel compared with single-agent data. Concurrent therapy with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and radiotherapy is feasible on this schedule. Further case accrual to assess efficacy is ongoing.

We studied the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) and carboplatin administered in combination to 21 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Paclitaxel was administered as a 24-hour intravenous infusion at doses of 135 to 200 mg/m2. Carboplatin, dosed to a target area under the concentration-time curve of 5, 7, 9, or 11 mg/mL.min, was administered as a 20-minute infusion immediately following paclitaxel. Neither the paclitaxel concentrations at the end of the infusion nor the terminal elimination of paclitaxel, as assessed by the duration of time that plasma paclitaxel concentrations were 0.05 mumol/L or greater, were different compared with historical data of paclitaxel as a single agent. Thus, we concluded that carboplatin had no perceived effect on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in this schedule. The observed areas under the concentration-time curves for carboplatin were consistently 10% to 15% less than the target values. Although this may indicate a possible interaction between paclitaxel and carboplatin, it also may have been a result of inadequate assessment of glomerular filtration rate, which was used to determine the carboplatin dose.

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Oncology, Princeton, NJ) and carboplatin have each shown activity against non-small cell lung cancer and they are synergistic in vitro. We thus designed a phase I study to define the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity of the combination with and without filgrastim support. With an initial fixed dose of paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 given as a 24-hour infusion, carboplatin was administered in escalating doses in cohorts of three patients, based on a target area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5, 7, 9, or 11 using Calvert's formula: dose (mg) = target AUC x (glomerular filtration rate + 25). Dose escalations were based on course I toxicities. Filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg was administered with the first cycle only after grade 4 neutropenia occurred in two of three patients at the prior dose level. One hundred five courses of paclitaxel and carboplatin have been administered in 26 patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4 neutropenia) occurred in two patients at level 2 (cycle I). Filgrastim was instituted thereafter with cycle I for the next four levels. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was seen at level 4; thus, the carboplatin dose was de-escalated in the next level, but the paclitaxel dose was escalated. The regimen has been well tolerated. One patient had a complete response and 12 had partial responses, for an overall response rate of 50%. There is a suggestion of a dose-response effect with both paclitaxel and carboplatin. The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin is active in non-small cell lung cancer, and the recommended phase II doses for the combination without filgrastim support are paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 as a 24-hour infusion with the carboplatin dose based on a target AUC of 7. The phase II dose with filgrastim support will be defined as dose escalation of paclitaxel continues.

The higher the T and N stages at diagnosis of head and neck cancer, the lower the proportion of patients who achieve complete, durable local control and the lower the survival. These cancers and their treatments often produce considerable anatomic distortion, affecting function, nutritional status, and appearance. New treatment approaches for locally and regionally advanced head and neck cancers are thus needed to improve survival, quality of life, or both. Combined-modality approaches show promise. Induction chemotherapy and subsequent radiotherapy produce results equivalent to aggressive surgery but allow for better organ function and speech. Induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy are superior to radiotherapy alone. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy may produce additive or synergistic interactions but increase toxicities. Some studies suggest that concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy significantly improves survival over radiotherapy alone in regionally advanced disease. Drug selection criteria have included enhancement of radiation cytotoxicity, effect on cellular kinetics, and, possibly, single-agent antitumor activity. The platinum compounds are of interest, especially in combination with other chemotherapy agents, like 5-fluorouracil and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ). Concurrent carboplatin and radiotherapy produced a 77-week duration of survival in responders in a University of Maryland Cancer Center study. A study of concurrent carboplatin/bleomycin/radiotherapy had to be halted because of severe bleomycin-induced mucositis. The results in this small group suggest that attenuating mucositis would be desirable. In a subsequent trial, paclitaxel, which shows considerable activity against head and neck cancers, was substituted for bleomycin. Data from the seven patients accrued thus far are too immature to define response. The study continues to accrue patients.

Objective: Several recent clinical studies have described an association between HIV seropositivity and lung cancer. The purpose of this study was to describe the spectrum of imaging findings in HIV-positive patients who had proved carcinoma of the lung. In particular, we attempted to define the role of CT in diagnosing HIV-associated lung cancer., Materials and Methods: The study population consisted of 23 HIV-positive patients from two institutions who had lung cancer diagnosed between 1989 and 1993. All patients had both chest radiographs and CT scans. The group included 19 men and four women with a mean age of 42 years. The diagnosis of lung cancer was confirmed by bronchoscopy in eight patients, by pleural fluid aspiration or pleural biopsy in seven, by percutaneous needle biopsy of a lung lesion in three, by biopsy of an extrathoracic site in four, and by thoracotomy in one. Two thoracic radiologists retrospectively evaluated the chest radiographs and CT scans to identify parenchymal masses, lymphadenopathy, pleural disease, chest wall or mediastinal invasion, and metastatic lesions., Results: Fifteen (65%) of the 23 patients had a central or peripheral mass or nodule. Eight (35%) had extensive pleural disease, either as an isolated finding or in combination with other abnormalities. CT scans showed the malignant lesion underlying the extensive pleural disease in all but one case. All patients with extensive pleural disease had adenocarcinoma. No patient in the study was considered a candidate for resection on the basis of clinical and radiologic evaluation., Conclusion: Lung cancer in HIV-positive patients manifested most often on chest radiographs as a central or peripheral mass or nodule. Extensive pleural disease in the absence of an apparent primary lesion was the second most common major manifestation. Lung cancer therefore merits serious consideration in the differential diagnosis of extensive pleural disease in HIV-positive patients. CT was most useful in evaluating malignant lesions associated with extensive pleural disease.

Vinorelbine (Navelbine; Burroughs Wellcome Co, Research Triangle Park, NC; Pierre Fabre Médicament, Paris, France) is a novel semisynthetic vinca alkaloid with antitumor activity in non-small cell lung cancer. An oral preparation of this drug is under investigation and was tested in a multicenter phase II study in patients with stage IV measurable or evaluable non-small cell lung cancer. The initial vinorelbine dose was 100 mg/m2/wk (80 mg/m2/wk for patients with prior radiotherapy). Following an initial 37% incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, the dose was reduced by 40 mg/dose. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and mucositis were other frequently observed toxicities. A preliminary analysis indicated a response rate of 14%, suggesting activity of this drug when administered orally.

The majority of patients with locally advanced, unresectable, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with conventional radiation therapy develop distant metastases and succumb to the disease. Thus, NSCLC should be viewed as a systemic disease, and attempts to control micrometastatic disease with chemotherapy should have a greater impact on survival. This does not eliminate the role of radiation therapy, as locoregional control is equally important. Combined chemoradiotherapy has become the major area of clinical research to improve long-term outcomes in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. The optimal chemoradiotherapy sequence is yet to be determined. Several randomized studies have demonstrated that sequential chemotherapy followed by definitive thoracic irradiation is superior to the same radiation therapy alone. The overall impact has been on both survival and incidence of distant metastasis. A number of pilot studies (phase II) have tested concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. At the University of Maryland Cancer Center, we are evaluating the efficacy of thoracic radiation (60 Gy) with concurrent weekly carboplatin, which has known activity in NSCLC and also has radiosensitizing effects. Preliminary results show that the combination is feasible and well tolerated; median survival rates compare favorably to those seen in the combined-modality arms of the randomized, sequential studies. Definitive conclusions based on the results of the reported studies are not possible, yet there seems to be a potential benefit to adding chemotherapy to radiation therapy. These trials need to be confirmed before they can be used to define a "standard of care" for patients with locally advanced, unresectable NSCLC.

Resistance to the intracellular Ca2+ pump inhibitor thapsigargin (TG) is associated with overexpression of both Ca2+ transport ATPase and the multidrug resistance (mdr) transporter P-glycoprotein (pgp). This is supported by increased resistance to TG following transfection of a functional pgp1 cDNA, and reversal of TG resistance with known inhibitors of pgp function. However, pgp is unlikely to represent the only mechanism of resistance to TG. Cell lines selected for high levels of resistance to TG (250-fold) show only a 3.7-fold increase in pgp expression and a 2-fold increase in cross-resistance to other drugs of the mdr class. Overexpression of endogenous Ca2+ transport ATPase may represent a second mechanism of resistance to TG. Increased Ca2+ ATPase expression (3-fold) is seen in cells made resistant to TG, and TG resistance increases with the transfection of a specific Ca2+ ATPase cDNA into DC-3F cells. If these transfectants are then made resistant to TG, both the endogenous Ca2+ ATPase and the exogenously transfected Ca2+ ATPase become overexpressed. These studies suggest that while TG may be a substrate for pgp, acquired resistance to TG can involve alterations in both pgp and Ca2+ ATPase expression. Additional, as yet unidentified, mechanisms of resistance may be involved in resistance to TG.

Etoposide has demonstrated highly significant clinical activity against a wide variety of neoplasms, including germ-cell malignancies, small-cell lung cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, leukemias, Kaposi's sarcoma, neuroblastoma, and soft-tissue sarcomas. It is also one of the important agents in the preparatory regimens given prior to bone marrow and peripheral stem-cell rescue. Despite its high degree of efficacy in a number of malignancies, the optimal dose, schedule, and dosing form remain to be defined. It is possible that continuous or prolonged inhibition of the substrate, i. e., topoisomerase II, may be the key factor for the cytotoxic effects of etoposide. Clinical studies have shown the activity of etoposide to be schedule-dependent, with prolonged dosing, best accomplished by the oral dosing form, offering a therapeutic advantage. This benefit awaits validation by prospective randomized studies, some of which are in progress. Recent clinical investigations have focused on the use of etoposide in combination with (a) cytokines to ameliorate myelosuppression, the dose-limiting toxicity of etoposide; (b) agents such as cyclosporin A and verapamil to alter the p-glycoprotein (mdr1) function; and (c) topoisomerase I inhibitors to modulate the substrate upon which it acts. There is continued interest in the development of etoposide to its maximal clinical dimensions and in the examination of alternative biochemical and mechanistic approaches to further our understanding of this highly active agent.

The objective of this phase IB trial was to determine if cyclophosphamide (CY) could enhance the immune effects of interleukin-2 (IL-2), and if it could, was there an optimal immunomodulatory dosage. IL-2 alone at 30 million IU/m2 thrice weekly for 6 weeks or in combination with varying dosages of CY (300, 600, and 1,200 mg/m2) administered 3 days before IL-2 and repeated 3 weeks later was given to consecutive cohorts of patients (at least five per group) with advanced malignancies of varying types. To gauge the immune effects of the treatment, the variation in the amount of lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells generated in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients and in a control group of normal volunteers was measured weekly over 7 consecutive weeks. Other immune parameters [natural killer cells (NK), peripheral blood eosinophils and lymphocytes, cell surface markers, soluble IL-2 receptor, and IL-2 antibodies] were also closely followed to study if they correlated with the degree of LAK activity. The group of patients that received low-dosage CY (300 mg/m2) and IL-2 produced the highest and most sustained levels of LAK and NK activity (p < 0.05) when compared with the cohorts receiving IL-2 alone or to those receiving the higher dosages of CY. No other immune parameter showed a significant difference between the groups. Although low-dosage CY does increase the LAK activity seen with IL-2, only randomized clinical trials can determine if this enhancement will improve tumor responses.

Regionally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for nearly 40% of all presentations of NSCLC. In the past, such patients received radiotherapy alone, but the median and long-term survival durations were disappointingly poor. Past attempts at combining chemotherapy and radiation were also disappointing, and were troubled by low doses of radiation or orthovoltage equipment or both. Recently, cisplatin-containing regimens have shown some efficacy in stage IV disease. The response rate for these combinations in stage III disease is nearly double that in stage IV disease. The greater response in stage III has led to a series of trials of sequenced chemotherapy and radiotherapy for treatment of regionally advanced (unresectable stage IIIA and IIIB) NSCLC. Several randomized trials have now shown a statistically significant advantage for the combined modality over radiation alone regarding time to treatment failure, median survival duration, and percent of long-term survivors. Other trials have focused on the concurrent use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Several pilot studies have suggested that concurrent cisplatin plus chest irradiation can produce apparently beneficial results with respect to local control and are the subject of ongoing clinical trials. At the University of Maryland Cancer Center, we have combined weekly carboplatin 100 mg/m2 with concurrent chest irradiation. The preliminary results are very encouraging. The toxicity of this treatment program is very manageable, and preliminary data suggest excellent local control and survival. Other pilot studies have suggested that combination chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy is also technically feasible.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Fifteen patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck received a 5 day continuous I.V. infusion of 6-thioguanine repeated every five weeks. Dose limiting toxicity was primarily hematological with grade III/IV leucopenia and thrombocytopenia seen in seven patients. Nausea and vomiting was moderate and well controlled with antiemetics. No complete or partial responses were observed, with a median time to progression of 58 days and a median survival of 227+ days for the entire group. Based on these results we do not recommend I.V. 6-thioguanine for the treatment of this disease.

Eight patients with advanced incurable salivary gland carcinoma were treated with the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (CAP). There were three clinical complete responses and two excellent partial responses. One of the three nonresponders had symptomatic improvement without any response in the measurable disease sites. Side effects were acceptable. All patients had moderate nausea and some degree of vomiting, which were adequately controlled by antiemetics. These results are preliminary but when considered with other reported trials using the same combination suggest an active treatment program for advanced neoplasms of the salivary glands.

A limited sampling strategy was developed to estimate the total area under the curve of plasma cyclophosphamide concentrations versus time (AUC). The strategy was developed with a training set consisting of 29 pharmacokinetic studies in 16 patients who received 1-h i.v. infusions of cyclophosphamide at a dosage of 1000 mg/m2. The strategy was developed by applying stepwise forward multiple regression analysis to cyclophosphamide concentrations observed at each time in the training set (independent variables) versus the AUC (dependent variable). It was confirmed by applying stepwise backward elimination regression analysis to the same data set. The final sampling strategy, which utilized three time points, was: AUC = 40.18C24 + 8.79C4 + 0.83C1 - 28 (dosage/1000), where C24, C4, and C1 represent plasma cyclophosphamide concentrations at 24, 4, and 1 h, respectively, and the dosage is in mg/m2 (r = 0.98). The strategy was validated prospectively with a test data set consisting of 14 pharmacokinetic studies in 11 patients who received 1-h i.v. infusions of cyclophosphamide at dosages of 300, 600, or 1200 mg/m2. The strategy proved highly predictive, with correlation coefficient between predicted and actual AUC of 0.94. The strategy also proved unbiased, with mean percentage of error (+/- SE) of 3.3 +/- 3.6%, and precise, with mean absolute percentage of error of 9.3 +/- 2.7%. The sampling strategy developed is being used in a multiinstitution trial of cyclophosphamide in an effort to relate cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics, as expressed by AUC, with the toxic or therapeutic pharmacodynamic responses of the drug.