301. Improved survival in cervical cancer patients receiving care at National Cancer Institute–designated cancer centers
- Author
-
McDaniels‐Davidson, Corinne, Feng, Christine H, Martinez, Maria Elena, Canchola, Alison J, Gomez, Scarlett Lin, Nodora, Jesse N, Patel, Sandip P, Mundt, Arno J, and Mayadev, Jyoti S
- Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Health Sciences ,Oncology and Carcinogenesis ,Cancer ,Women's Health ,Clinical Research ,Adult ,Ethnicity ,Female ,Humans ,Middle Aged ,National Cancer Institute (U.S.) ,Proportional Hazards Models ,Registries ,United States ,Uterine Cervical Neoplasms ,brachytherapy ,California ,cancer center ,cervical cancer ,treatment outcome ,uterine cervical neoplasms ,Public Health and Health Services ,Oncology & Carcinogenesis ,Oncology and carcinogenesis ,Public health - Abstract
BackgroundLocally advanced cervical cancer (CC) remains lethal in the United States. We investigate the effect of receiving care at an National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center (NCICC) on survival.MethodsData for women diagnosed with CC from 2004 to 2016 who received radiation treatment were extracted from the California Cancer Registry (n = 4250). Cox proportional hazards regression models assessed whether (1) receiving care at NCICCs was associated with risk of CC-specific death, (2) this association remained after multivariable adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, and insurance status, and (3) this association was explained by receipt of guideline-concordant treatment.ResultsMedian age was 50 years (interquartile range [IQR] 41-61 years), with median follow-up of 2.7 years (IQR 1.3-6.0 years). One-third of patients were seen at an NCICC, and 29% died of CC. The hazard of CC-specific death was reduced by 20% for those receiving care at NCICCs compared with patients receiving care elsewhere (HR = .80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.90). Adjustment for guideline-concordant treatment and other covariates minimally attenuated the association to 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74-0.95), suggesting that the survival advantage associated with care at NCICCs may not be due to receipt of guideline-concordant treatment.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates survival benefit for patients receiving care at NCICCs compared with those receiving care elsewhere that is not explained by differences in guideline-concordant care. Structural, organizational, or provider characteristics and differences in patients receiving care at centers with and without NCI designation could explain observed associations. Further understanding of these factors will promote equality across oncology care facilities and survival equity for patients with CC.
- Published
- 2022