251. Trajectory of left ventricular ejection fraction among individuals eligible for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
- Author
-
Amy Gravely, Selma Carlson, and Selcuk Adabag
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Databases, Factual ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Cardiomyopathy ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Sudden cardiac death ,03 medical and health sciences ,Ventricular Dysfunction, Left ,0302 clinical medicine ,Risk Factors ,Internal medicine ,Medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Ejection fraction ,Ischemic cardiomyopathy ,business.industry ,Stroke Volume ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator ,Icd therapy ,Defibrillators, Implantable ,Nonischemic cardiomyopathy ,Death, Sudden, Cardiac ,Heart failure ,Cardiology ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Cardiomyopathies - Abstract
Objective: Examine the trajectory of left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) among patients eligible for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy Background: Ejection fraction is the cornerstone criterion for ICD therapy, but the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains after an improvement in EF. Methods: We examined the trajectory of EF among 1178 participants of the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) who had 3 or more assessments of EF, at least 90 days apart. A follow-up EF >35% or >10% absolute increase in EF from baseline were examined as the criteria for EF improvement. Results: At first follow-up, 381 (32%) patients had an improvement of EF to >35%. However, EF had returned back to 35% in 109 (27%) of these patients at second follow-up. Similarly, 446 (38%) patients experienced a >10% improvement in EF at first follow-up, but 109 (24%) of these had a subsequent >10% decrease in EF at the second follow-up. Of the 32 patients with normalized EF (≥55%) at first follow-up, 18 (56%) had a subsequent >10% decrease in EF. The fluctuation in EF was present in both ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy but a higher proportion of patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy had an improvement in EF to >35% at first follow-up compared to those with ischemic cardiomyopathy (38% vs. 27%, p=
- Published
- 2020