Search

Background: Pulmonary hypertension secondary to left heart disease (WHO Group 2) is a known risk factor in patients with heart failure. The favourable effect of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) on pulmonary hypertension has been demonstrated before, although this effect has not been well-studied in advanced pulmonary arterial bed disease with a significant elevation in pulmonary vascular resistance.Methods: We reviewed the records of 258 LVAD patients in our institution. Patients with elevated mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP>25mmHg) and elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR ≥3 Wood units) were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups based on their baseline PVR (PVR=3-5 Wood units (WU) vs. PVR>5WU). The groups were studied for the changes in their pulmonary haemodynamics after the placement of LVAD.Results: Fifty-one (51) patients were included in the study. All patients showed a significant improvement in their pulmonary haemodynamic parameters post LVAD placement. In the group with the higher PVR, mPAP dropped from a baseline of 43±7mmHg to 22±6mmHg post LVAD placement (p<0.001), while PVR dropped from 6.3±1.2 Wood units to 2.2±1.1 Wood units (p<0.001). In a subgroup of patients who underwent cardiac transplantation post LVAD (n=14), all patients maintained a normalised PVR (<3WU) one year post cardiac transplantation.Conclusions: Left ventricular assist devices can reverse pulmonary hypertension WHO Group 2 with significantly elevated PVR; this effect is not dependent on the baseline PVR, and is maintained up to one year post cardiac transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Galectin-3, a novel binding-lectin involved in inflammation and fibrosis, is elevated in heart failure and is independently predictive of mortality in this condition. We sought to evaluate galectin-3 levels and its prognostic value in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), a known inflammatory state, in the setting of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction-associated PH (HFpEF-PH).Methods: We measured galectin-3 levels in 76 patients with PH; 37 patients with PAH and 39 patients with HFpEF-PH. Baseline characteristics, and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the prognostic value of galectin-3.Results: Median (IQR) galectin-3 (ng/mL) for the entire cohort was 24.65 (IQR=10.39, 32.90); 22.33 (IQR=18.94, 27.30) and 28.94 (IQR=21.67, 39.85) in the PAH and HFpEF-PH, respectively (p=0.07). After evaluation of the galectin-3 levels by tertile, mortality rates were 16% (4/25), 34.6% (9/26), and 48% (12/25) in tertiles 1-3, respectively, and Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant increase in mortality across increasing galectin-3 tertiles (log-rank p=0.014). On Cox regression analysis, galectin-3 was a strong predictor of mortality on both univariate HR=2.09 per tertile (95% CI=1.21, 3.62 per tertile; p-trend=0.008) and multivariate analysis HR=2.19 per tertile (95% CI=1.06, 4.54; p-trend=0.035) after adjusting for age, sex, race, glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), NT-proBNP, medications, and aetiology of PH (PAH vs. HFpEF-PH).Conclusion: Galectin-3 is a strong, independent prognostic marker in PH, regardless of aetiology. Larger studies should further evaluate the role of galectin-3 as a prognostic biomarker and possible therapeutic target in PH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inflammation is an increasingly recognized hallmark of pulmonary hypertension (PH). Statins have been shown to attenuate key pathologic mechanisms via pleiotropic effects in animal models. However, clinical benefit of statins in patients with PH is unknown and their effect on mortality has not been studied. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients between January 2002 to January 2012, with severe PH (pulmonary artery systolic pressure ≥60 mmHg) and preserved left ventricular function (ejection fraction ≥50%), defined by transthoracic echocardiograms. Patients were divided into two groups based on statin therapy for 12 consecutive months after diagnosis of PH. Propensity score matching was performed. Subgroup analysis was done based on COPD status. Study endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality and hospitalization. 2363 patients (age 71 ± 16; 31% male) were included; 140 (6%) were on statin therapy. Overall 1-year mortality was 34%. Following propensity score matching, 138 patients were included in the statin group and 624 patients in the no-statin group; all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the statin group compared with the no-statin group [15.2 vs. 33.8%, HR 0.42 (95% CI 0.27, 0.66), p < 0.001], but hospitalization was comparable between two groups. After stratifying patients based on COPD status, patients with COPD showed a marginally significant survival benefit from statins [HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.26, 1.10), p = 0.09]; and statins significantly reduced 1-year all-cause mortality in patients without COPD [HR 0.36 (95% CI 0.19, 0.67), p = 0.001]. We found no significant difference in the effect of statins on patients with COPD compared to those without ( p = 0.16). Statin therapy is associated with reduced mortality risk in patients with severe PH and preserved left ventricular function. This beneficial effect was not found to be dependent on COPD status. These novel findings should be confirmed in large randomized trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Sinus tachycardia ( ST) is common after heart transplantation ( HTx). The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of diltiazem treatment during the first year after HTx on heart rate ( HR), cardiac allograft function, and exercise capacity. Methods From the total cohort, 25 HTx recipients started diltiazem treatment 4±2 weeks after HTx and continued it for at least 1 year (diltiazem group). Each study case was matched to a control. All patients underwent hemodynamic assessment and cardiopulmonary exercise test ( CPET) at 1 year after HTx. Results HR decreased in the diltiazem group from 99±11 bpm to 94±7 bpm ( P=.03) and did not change in the controls (98±11 bpm vs 100±13 bpm, P=.14). The difference between the groups at 1 year after HTx was significant ( P=.04). In the diltiazem group left ventricular ( LV), stroke volume and ejection fraction increased (48±16 vs 55±17 mL, P=.02, and 60%±10% vs 62%±12% P=.03, respectively) but did not differ from controls. E/E' decreased (10.7±2.7 vs 7.3±1.9, P=.003) while cardiac index was higher (3.5±0.8 vs 3.1±0.5; P=.05) in the diltiazem group at 1-year follow-up. The absolute peak VO2 (21±4 vs 18±6 mL/kg/min; P=.05) and normalized peak VO2 (73%±17% vs 58%±14%; P=.004) were significantly higher in the diltiazem group. Conclusions This study showed that diltiazem treatment reduces ST, may improve cardiac allograft function and exercise tolerance during the first year after HTx. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The relationship between heart failure (HF) and the serotonergic system has been established in animal studies. However, data on human plasma serotonin level in HF and its significance over the course of the disease is lacking.Methods: Serotonin levels were measured in 173 patients (108 males, 65 females), 116 were stable HF and 40 were acute decompensated HF patients. The normal control group included 17 healthy volunteers with no known medical or psychiatric conditions. Patients receiving medications affecting serotonin receptors and those with pulmonary hypertension were excluded. All patients, except for those in the decompensated group, were on stable doses of HF medications.Results: Plasma serotonin levels were significantly elevated in decompensated HF patients compared with stable patients (P=0.002). Higher plasma serotonin levels were associated with worse HF symptoms (NYHA class) and the presence of systolic dysfunction, and was borderline associated with low peak oxygen consumption during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (P=0.055). These results were independent of age, gender, race, hypertension, diabetes, renal failure, weight, coronary artery disease (CAD), atrial fibrillation and medication use.Conclusions: Serotonin is a marker for decompensation in patients with chronic heart failure. Higher serotonin levels were associated with worse HF symptoms and systolic dysfunction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Sinus tachycardia often presents in heart transplantation ( HTx) recipients, but data on its effect on exercise performance are limited. Methods Based on mean heart rate ( HR) value 3 months after HTx, 181 patients transplanted from 2006 to 2015 at University of Nebraska Medical Center were divided into two groups: (i) HR<95 beats/min (bpm, n=93); and (ii) HR≥95 bpm (n=88). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing ( CPET) was performed 1 year after HTx. Results Mean HR at 3 months post- HTx was 94±11 bpm and did not change significantly at 1 year post- HTx (96±11 bpm, P=.13). HR≥95 bpm at 3 months was associated with younger donor age ( OR 1.1; CI 1.0-1.1, P=.02), female donors ( OR −2.4; CI 1.16-5.24 P=.02), and lack of donors' heavy alcohol use ( OR −0.43; CI 0.17-0.61; P=.04). HR≥95 bpm at 3 months post- HTx was independently associated with decreased exercise capacity in metabolic equivalent ( P=.008), reduced peak VO2 ( P=.006), and percent of predicted peak VO2 ( P=.002) during CPET. Conclusions HR≥95 at 3 months following HTx is associated with reduced exercise tolerance in stable HTx recipients. Medical HR reduction after HTx could improve exercise performance after HTx and merits further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neuregulins are important growth factors involved in cardiac development and response to stress. Certain isoforms and fragments of neuregulin have been found to be cardioprotective. The effects of a full-length neuregulin-1β isoform, glial growth factor 2 (GGF2; USAN/INN; also called cimaglermin) were investigated in vitro. Various dosing regimens were then evaluated for their effects on left ventricular (LV) function in rats with surgically-induced myocardial infarction. In vitro , GGF2 bound with high affinity to erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene (ErbB) 4 receptors, potently promoted Akt phosphorylation, as well as reduced cell death following doxorubicin exposure in HL1 cells. Daily GGF2 treatment beginning 7–14 days after left anterior descending coronary artery ligation produced improvements in LV ejection fraction and other measures of LV function and morphology. The improvements in LV function (e.g. 10% point increase in absolute LV ejection fraction) with GGF2 were dose-dependent. LV performance was substantially improved when GGF2 treatment was delivered infrequently, despite a serum half-life of less than 2 h and could be maintained for more than 10 months with treatment once weekly or once every 2 weeks. These studies confirm previous findings that GGF2 may improve contractile performance in the failing rat heart and that infrequent exposure to GGF2 may improve LV function and impact remodeling in the failing myocardium. GGF2 is now being developed for the treatment of heart failure in humans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Myocardial recovery with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy is highly variable and difficult to predict. Next generation ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing is an innovative, rapid, and quantitative approach to gene expression profiling in small amounts of tissue. Our primary goal was to identify baseline transcriptional profiles in non-ischemic cardiomyopathies that predict myocardial recovery in response to LVAD therapy. We also sought to verify transcriptional differences between failing and non-failing human hearts. Methods: RNA was isolated from failing (n = 16) and non-failing (n = 8) human hearts. RNA from each patient was reverse transcribed and quantitatively sequenced on the personal genome machine (PGM) sequencer (Ion torrent) for 95 heart failure candidate genes. Coverage analysis as well as mapping the reads and alignment was done using the Ion Torrent Browser Suite™. Differential expression analyses were conducted by empirical analysis of digital gene expression data in R (edgeR) to identify differential expressed genes between failing and non-failing groups, and between responder and non-responder groups respectively. Targeted cardiac gene messenger RNA (mRNA) expression was analyzed in proportion to the total number of reads. Gene expression profiles from the PGM sequencer were validated by performing RNA sequencing (RNAseq) with the Illumina Hiseq2500 sequencing system. Results: The failing sample population was 75% male with an average age of 50 and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 16%. Myosin light chain kinase (MYLK) and interleukin (IL)-6 genes expression were significantly higher in LVAD responders compared to non-responders. Thirty-six cardiac genes were expressed differentially between failing and non-failing hearts (23 decreased, 13 elevated). MYLK, Beta-1 adrenergic receptor (ADRB1) and myosin heavy chain (MYH)-6 expression were among those significantly decreased in failing hearts compared to non-failing hearts. Natriuretic peptide B (NPPB) and IL-6 were significantly elevated. Targeted gene expression profiles obtained from the Ion torrent PGM sequencer were consistent with those obtained from Illumina HiSeq2500 sequencing system. Conclusions: Heart failure is associated with a network of transcriptional changes involving contractile proteins, metabolism, adrenergic receptors, protein phosphorylation, and signaling factors. Myocardial MYLK and IL-6 expression are positively correlated with ejection fraction (EF) response to LVAD placement. Targeted RNA sequencing of myocardial gene expression can be utilized to predict responders to LVAD therapy and to better characterize transcriptional changes in human heart failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Studies suggest that thrombocytopaenia is associated with a higher mortality in several diseases. Little is known about the effect of low platelet count on mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of thrombocytopaenia in these patients by assessing all-cause mortality.Methods: A total of 1,907 patients with HFrEF, defined by left ventricular ejection fraction <40% on echocardiography, were analysed in this multi-centre retrospective study. All patients were on medical therapy with a beta-blocker and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Patients were categorised into two groups based on platelet count measured within one month of the diagnosis of HFrEF: normal to mild thrombocytopaenia (platelet count 100,000-450,000 per uL); and moderate to severe thrombocytopaenia (platelet count <100,000 per uL). One-year all-cause mortality was compared between the two groups.Results: Mean age was 65±15 years and 62% of patients were male. Overall one-year mortality was 17.2% with higher mortality among patients with HFrEF and moderate/severe thrombocytopaenia compared to those with normal/mild thrombocytopaenia (33.0% vs. 15.4%, p <0.001). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients with HFrEF and moderate/severe thrombocytopaenia had a higher mortality compared to patients with normal/mild thrombocytopaenia (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.33-2.56, p <0.001).Conclusion: In patients with HFrEF, higher degree of thrombocytopaenia is associated with higher all-cause mortality. These findings may support the use of platelet counts as a prognostic marker in the assessment of the patient with HFrEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality but the relationship between LVEF and outcomes is unclear. We explored the association between LVEF and 30 and 180 day mortality in 7007 ADHF patients enrolled in the Acute Studies of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure (ASCEND-HF) trial. Methods and results We explored the association between LVEF and 30 and 180 day mortality in 7007 ADHF patients enrolled in the Acute Studies of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure (ASCEND-HF) trial. LVEF was analysed both as a continuous variable and according to three categories: < 40% (LowEF), 40-50% [intermediate EF (IntEF)], and > 50% [preserved ejection fraction (PresEF)]. Of the patients in the trial, 4474 (78.7%) had LowEF, 674 (11.9%) had IntEF, and 539 (9.5%) had PresEF. The unadjusted 30 and 180 day mortality was similar for LowEF (3.7%, 12.3%), IntEF (3.4%, 13.1%), and PresEF (4.3%, 14.1%), respectively ( P > 0.05). After multivariable adjustment, the hazard ratio (HR) for 180 day mortality remained similar for the LowEF [HR 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-1.24; P = 0.77] and IntEF (0.91, 95% CI 0.66-1.3; P = 0.58) compared to PresEF patients. By contrast, when LVEF was evaluated as a continuous measure, it exhibited a U-shaped pattern with mortality. After matching for age and sex, the mortality risk attributed to LVEF was attenuated, as the LVEF increased as a continuous variable over 35%. However, in patients with EF < 35%, the mortality risk continue to increase as the LVEF declined. Conclusions Among patients with ADHF, the unadjusted mortality rates are similar across LVEF strata. However, after accounting for key patient variables, the mortality risk increases as EF falls below 35%. These data will be useful in planning future studies of ADHF. Clinical Trial Registration identifier: NCT00475852 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background : Although beta blockers (BBs) are established therapy in heart failure, some patients whose left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) initially increases on BB therapy experience a subsequent LVEF decline. This study aimed to evaluate the proportion of patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) whose LVEF declines while on BB therapy and determine important predictors of LVEF decline. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 238 patients receiving a BB (carvedilol, metoprolol succinate, or tartrate), with an ejection fraction of ≤40 % and NICM, whose LVEF initially rose ≥5 % after 1 year of BB therapy, was conducted. Post-response LVEF decline ≥5 % to a final LVEF of ≤35 % was evaluated within 4 years of BB initiation. Results: In our study, we had 52 Caucasians (22 %), 78 Hispanics (33 %), and 108 African Americans (45 %). Overall, 32 patients (13.44 %) had post-response LVEF decline. The nadir LVEF of patients with post-response LVEF decline was 25 % (interquartile range 20-27). Compared with others, Hispanics had lower nadir LVEF (22 %, p < 0.001). Important predictors of LVEF decline were Hispanic race (odds ratio (OR) 6.094, p < 0.001), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (OR 2.287, p < 0.05), baseline LVEF (OR 1.075, p < 0.05), and age (OR 0.933, p < 0.001). Conclusion: A significant proportion (13.44 %) of NICM patients with LVEF increase over 1 year of BB therapy experienced subsequent LVEF decline. Race, NYHA class, baseline LVEF, and age are important predictors of this decline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cardiac transplantation in many centers is programmatically limited to patients aged younger than 70 years. We investigated the trends and outcomes for cardiac transplantation in recipients aged 70 years and older in the United States. Methods: De-identified data were provided by United Network of Organ Sharing. Transplant recipients were grouped by age 60–69 years and 70 years and older. Univariate comparisons were performed using Student''s t-test or the Pearson chi-square test. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier technique and compared with the log-rank test. Cox regression was used to determine predictors of death after transplant. Statistical significance was assigned to p < 0.05. Results: Between January 1, 1998, and June 15, 2010, 5,807 sexagenarians and 332 septuagenarians received allografts. The septuagenarian cohort had more men, less diabetes, was less likely to have a ventricular assist device, and more likely to be status II. Donors for septuagenarians were older and died more frequently from intracranial hemorrhage. Median unadjusted survival was 9.8 years for sexagenarians vs 8.5 years for septuagenarians (p = 0.003). There was no difference in the incidence of cerebrovascular accident, length of stay, or pacemaker need between groups. Septuagenarians were less likely to be treated for rejection the first year (p = 0.001). Age was a multivariate predictor of death (hazard ratio, 1.289; 95% confidence interval, 1.039–1.6; p = 0.021). Conclusions: Selected septuagenarians with advanced heart failure can derive great benefit from cardiac transplantation, although survival is inferior to that of an immediately younger sexagenarian cohort. Most of the mortality risk is seen in the first year after transplantation. A reduced incidence of rejection was observed and warrants further study. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Macitentan is a dual endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) approved for treating pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). SOPRANO evaluated the efficacy and safety of macitentan versus placebo in pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. SOPRANO was a phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Patients with an LVAD implanted within the prior 90 days who had persistent PH (i.e., mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥25 mmHg, pulmonary artery wedge pressure [PAWP] ≤18 mmHg, and pulmonary vascular resistance [PVR] >3 Wood units [WU]) were randomized (1:1) to macitentan 10 mg or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in PVR. Secondary endpoints included change in right-heart catheterization hemodynamic variables, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide levels, World Health Organization functional class, and safety/tolerability. Fifty-seven patients were randomized to macitentan ( n  = 28) or placebo ( n  = 29). A statistically significant reduction in PVR from baseline to Week 12 was observed with macitentan versus placebo (placebo-corrected geometric mean ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.94; p  = .0158). No statistically significant differences were observed in secondary endpoints. In a post-hoc analysis, 66.7% of patients receiving macitentan achieved PVR <3 WU versus 40.0% receiving placebo ( p  = .0383). Macitentan was generally well tolerated; adverse events were consistent with those in previous PAH studies with macitentan. In conclusion, macitentan showed promising tolerability and significantly reduced PVR in PH patients with persistently elevated PVR after LVAD implantation. ClinicalTrials. gov identifier: NCT02554903., Competing Interests: Robert P. Frantz is receiving grants and research support from United Therapeutics, Medtronic, and Gossamer Bio, and is scientific medical advisor to Altavant, ShouTi, Liquidia Corporation, Merck, Tenax Therapeutics, and Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson. His institution has received funding from Bayer and Gossamer Bio. Shashank S. Desai has served on the speakers’ bureau for Abbott. Gregory Ewald is on the speakers’ bureau and is a consultant with Abbott. Veronica Franco's institution receives research support from Acceleron/Merck, Gossamer, Janssen, United Therapeutics, Aerovate Therapeutics, Respira, and Cereno Scientific. Antoine Hage is receiving grants and research support from United Therapeutics, Lung LLC, Arena, Reata, and Bayer, and is a stockholder in Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer. Evelyn M. Horn's institution has received funding from Gossamer, Acceleron/Merck, Abbott, and Cereno Scientific. Stacy Mandras is a speaker and consultant for United Therapeutics and Bayer Pharmaceuticals. Myung H. Park is a scientific medical advisor with AstraZeneca. Ashwin K. Ravichandran is consulting/speaking for Abbott, Medtronic and speaking for United Therapeutics, Janssen, and Bayer; he personally receives no grants from these companies, but his institution does. Ronald Zolty is a consultant for Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Bayer, United Therapeutics, and Alnylam. Mark A. Rocco, Mona Selej, and Carol Zhao were employees of Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc., South San Francisco, CA (at the time of manuscript development) and are current stockholders of Johnson & Johnson. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (© 2024 Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. Pulmonary Circulation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute.)

Background: Preoperative amiodarone effects on postorthotopic heart transplant (OHT) outcomes remain controversial., Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cumulative pre-OHT amiodarone exposure on severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD)., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adult OHT recipients between August 2012 and June 2018. Primary outcome was severe PGD in patients receiving amiodarone at 3, 6, and 12 months prior to OHT compared with those not receiving amiodarone. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, early graft failure (EGF), mortality at 3, 6, and 12 months post-OHT, and 30-day incidence of postoperative tachyarrhythmias, bradycardia, permanent pacemaker implantation, and rejection., Results: Incidence of severe PGD was 12.5% in those who received amiodarone compared to 6.8% in those who did not (14 vs 6, P = 0.18). Cumulative preoperative amiodarone significantly increased the odds of severe PGD at 3 months (odds ratio [OR]: 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.001-1.06; P = 0.044) and 6 months (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.003-1.044; P = 0.024) in a multivariate logistic regression. Patients on amiodarone had significantly higher rates of postoperative bradycardia (13.4% vs 4.5%, P = 0.03)., Conclusion and Relevance: A trend toward increased PGD was present in patients receiving preoperative amiodarone. This finding combined with the regression showing significantly increased odds of PGD with increasing 3 and 6 month cumulative amiodarone dose is clinically concerning. Escalation of care with pacemaker implantation was required more frequently in patients on pre-OHT amiodarone., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objectives: The primary goal of this study was to identify and understand the burden experienced by informal caregivers of patients with HF at the time of hospital discharge. The researchers aimed to guide future education interventions and promote informal caregiver burden screening., Design: The researchers administered the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) as a quantitative tool to assess informal caregiver burden. The ZBI is a standardized questionnaire used to measure the extent of burden experienced by informal caregivers. After administering the ZBI, the researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with five informal caregivers of patients with HF. These interviews were guided by probing questions related to ZBI items that were rated with high levels of burden (3 "quite frequently" or 4 "nearly always")., Results: The quantitative data showed that the informal caregivers' burden scores on the ZBI ranged from 4 to 41. Male informal caregivers tended to report lower burden scores. The non-spouse informal caregiver had the highest burden score at 41. The qualitative analysis of the interviews revealed several themes related to informal caregiver burden, including fear, patient expectations, patient dependence on caregivers, social isolation, and stressors associated with medication changes after discharge. Despite the qualitative insights into specific burden-related issues, the quantitative analysis of the ZBI scores showed that, on average, informal caregivers reported little to no burden at the time of acute exacerbation of HF in the patient., Conclusion: The study's findings suggest that while informal caregivers may not report prominent levels of overall burden, they do face specific challenges and stressors, such as social isolation and managing medication changes post-discharge. These findings can inform the development of targeted support and interventions for informal caregivers of patients with HF., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors confirm there is zero conflict of interest for this manuscript., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Morbidity and mortality in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remain high. Activation of platelet-derived growth factor receptor, colony stimulating factor 1 receptor, and mast or stem cell growth factor receptor kinases stimulates inflammatory, proliferative, and fibrotic pathways driving pulmonary vascular remodelling in PAH. Seralutinib, an inhaled kinase inhibitor, targets these pathways. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of seralutinib in patients with PAH receiving standard background therapy., Methods: The TORREY trial was a phase 2, randomised, multicentre, multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients with PAH from 40 hospital and community sites were randomly assigned 1:1 via interactive response technologies to receive seralutinib (60 mg twice daily for 2 weeks, then increased to 90 mg twice daily as tolerated) or placebo by dry powder inhaler twice daily for 24 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by baseline pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR; <800 dyne·s/cm 5 and ≥800 dyne·s/cm 5 ). Patients were eligible if classified as WHO Group 1 PH (PAH), WHO Functional Class II or III, with a PVR of 400 dyne·s/cm 5 or more, and a 6 min walk distance of between 150 m and 550 m. The primary endpoint was change in PVR from baseline to 24 weeks. Analyses for efficacy endpoints were conducted in randomly assigned patients (intention-to-treat population). Safety analyses included all patients who received the study drug. TORREY was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04456998) and EudraCT (2019-002669-37) and is completed., Findings: From Nov 12, 2020, to April 20, 2022, 151 patients were screened for eligibility, and following exclusions, 86 adults receiving PAH background therapy were randomly assigned to seralutinib (n=44; four male, 40 female) or placebo (n=42; four male, 38 female), and comprised the intention-to-treat population. At baseline, treatment groups were balanced except for a higher representation of WHO Functional Class II patients in the seralutinib group. The least squares mean change from baseline to week 24 in PVR was 21·2 dyne·s/cm 5 (95% CI -37·4 to 79·8) for the placebo group and -74·9 dyne·s/cm 5 (-139·7 to -10·2) for the seralutinib group. The least squares mean difference between the seralutinib and placebo groups for change in PVR was -96·1 dyne·s/cm 5 (95% CI -183·5 to -8·8; p=0·03). The most common treatment-emergent adverse event in both treatment groups was cough: 16 (38%) of 42 patients in the placebo group; 19 (43%) of 44 patients in the seralutinib group., Interpretation: Treatment with inhaled seralutinib significantly decreased PVR, meeting the primary endpoint of the study among patients receiving background therapy for PAH., Funding: Gossamer Bio., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests ARH reports having received consulting fees from United Therapeutics, Tenax Therapeutics, Merck, and Janssen; having served as an advisory committee member for Gossamer Bio; and having held stock from Tenax Therapeutics. CT, DM, EE, EP, J-MB, LSZ, MC, RA, RFR, and RO report stocks or stock options from Gossamer Bio; and employment at Gossamer Bio. LSZ also reported patents related to seralutinib (assigned to Gossamer Bio or Pulmokine); stocks or stock options from Pulmokine. RFR also reported previous consulting fees from Gossamer Bio. H-AG reports having received consulting fees from Gossamer Bio, Aerovate, Altavant, Bayer AG, Attgeno, Janssen and Actelion, MSD and Acceleron, and Pfizer; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, or educational events from Bayer AG, Janssen and Actelion, and MSD and Acceleron; participated as an advisory committee member for Aerovate, Altavant, Bayer AG, Attgeno, Janssen and Actelion, MSD and Acceleron, and Pfizer; and as a member of a data and safety monitoring board for Insmed. J-LV reports having received consulting fees from Gossamer Bio, ShouTi, Janssen, Enzyvant, Bayer HealthCare, Merck, Liquidia, Aerami, and Insmed; received payment or honoraria (payment to their institution) for lectures, presentations, or educational events from Janssen, Merck, Novartis, and Boehringer Ingelheim; received payment for expert testimony from Actelion Pharmaceuticals; received either support for attending meetings or travel (payment to their institution) from Merck; participated on a data safety monitoring board (payment to their institution) from Janssen, GSK, and Moderna; membership on steering committees for Gossamer Bio, Insmed, Merck, and United Therapeutics. KMC reports having received grants or contracts (payment made to their institution) for clinical studies overseen by her from Gossamer Bio, Janssen, United Therapeutics, Merck, Acceleron, and Altavant; received consulting fees from Acceleron; received fees for participating on an advisory board for Merck; received fees for work as an advisory committee member for Gossamer Bio; received fees for work as a steering committee member for Janssen; received fees for work on an adjudication committee for Arena and United Therapeutics; and received fees for an editorial role with the American Heart Association. LSH reported having received payment or honoraria for speaker bureau membership from Janssen; participated as an advisory board member for Janssen, MSD, Altavant, and United Therapeutics, and as an advisory committee member for Gossamer Bio; and having stock or stock options at ATXA Therapeutics, iOWNA, and Circular. OS reports having received grants or contracts for research (payment made to their institution) from Janssen, MSD, and AOP Orphan; payment or honoraria for lectures or an educational event from AOP Orphan, Ferrer, Janssen, and MSD; support for attending meetings or travel from MSD and Janssen; and participated on an advisory committee for Gossamer Bio, AOP Orphan, Enzyvant, Ferrer, Janssen, and MSD. PES reports having received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Janssen, MSD, Ferrer, and AOT; support for either attending meetings or travel from Janssen and MSD; participated in a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Janssen, MSD, Ferrer, Gossamer Bio, and AOT; and receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from Gossamer Bio. RLB reports having received consulting fees from Merck, United Therapeutics, KEROS, Aerovate, Insmed, and Cereno; served as an advisory committee member for Gossamer Bio; served as an advisory board member for Altavant, Merck, Janssen, and Insmed; served on a data safety monitoring board for Janssen; and served on a scientific advisory board for Cereno. RLZ reports having received consulting fees from Johnson & Johnson, United Therapeutics, Bayer, and Alnylam. RNC reports having received consulting fees from Gossamer Bio, Janssen, Bayer, United Therapeutics, and Third Pole; payment or honoraria for lectures from Janssen and Bayer; and participated on an advisory committee for Gossamer Bio, Janssen, and Bayer. RPF reports having royalties or licenses from UpToDate; receiving consulting fees from Janssen and Liquidia; participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Gossamer Bio (as an advisory committee member); participated on an advisory board for Janssen, Liquidia, Tenax Therapeutics, ShouTi, Insmed, and Merck; and participated on a data safety monitoring board for Aerovate. RTZ reports having received grants or contracts for industry-supported research from United Therapeutics, Janssen, Tenax Therapeutics, and Gossamer Bio; consulting fees from Janssen, Vivus, Morphogen-IX, Merck, and Gossamer Bio; and stock or stock options from Selten. SS reports having received a research grant from United Therapeutics; speaker honoraria (received by his institute) from Janssen and United Therapeutics; served as an advisor to Janssen, Bayer, United Therapeutics, Gossamer Bio, Altavant Sciences, and Merck; served as a steering committee member for Bayer, Keros, and Liquidia Technologies; and served as a data safety monitoring board committee member for the National Institutes of Health K23 grant. VVM reports having received grant support from Aerovate, Enzyvant, Gossamer Bio, Janssen, Merck, and Sonovie; consulting fees from Aerami, Aerovate, Caremark, Corvista, Enzyvant, Gossamer Bio, Janssen, Merck, United Therapeutics, and Vertex; and participated as an advisory committee member for Gossamer Bio. All authors report receiving medical writing and editorial support for the present manuscript funded by Gossamer Bio., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Aim: The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is a common measure of functional capacity in patients with heart failure (HF). Primary clinical study end points in cardiomyopathy (CM) trials, including transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis with CM (ATTR-CM), are often limited to hospitalization and mortality. Objective: To investigate the relationship between the 6MWT and hospitalization or mortality in CM, including ATTR-CM. Method: A PRISMA-guided systematic literature review was conducted using search terms for CM, 6MWT, hospitalization and mortality. Results: Forty-one studies were identified that reported 6MWT data and hospitalization or mortality data for patients with CM. The data suggest that a greater 6MWT distance is associated with a reduced risk of hospitalization or mortality in CM. Conclusion: The 6MWT is an accepted alternative end point in CM trials, including ATTR-CM.

Rationale: Oral treprostinil slows disease progression and improves exercise capacity in pulmonary arterial hypertension; however, titration can be prolonged. Published data suggests prostacyclin-naïve patients achieve total daily oral treprostinil doses of about 6 mg by Week 16, while those on prior parenteral treprostinil reach higher doses at the same timepoint., Objectives: EXPEDITE (NCT03497689), a single-arm, multicenter study, assessed the efficacy of rapid parenteral treprostinil induction to quickly reach higher doses of oral treprostinil for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension., Methods: Parenteral treprostinil was titrated for 2-8 weeks, followed by cross-titration of oral treprostinil. The primary endpoint was percentage of patients reaching ≥12 mg daily of oral treprostinil at Week 16. Secondary endpoints included clinical changes from baseline to Week 16., Results: Twenty-nine prostacyclin-naïve patients were included in efficacy analyses. At Week 16, the mean daily oral treprostinil dose was 16.4 mg; 79% of patients met the primary endpoint. From baseline to Week 16, median REVEAL Lite 2 score improved (decreased) from 6 to 3.5 (p = 0.0006). Statistically significant improvements were also seen in World Health Organization Functional Class, N-terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide levels, 6-minute walk distance, right atrial area, Borg Dyspnea Score, and emPHasis-10 score. Favorable trends were seen in risk stratification, echocardiography parameters, disease symptoms, and treatment satisfaction., Conclusion: Short-course parenteral treprostinil induction resulted in oral treprostinil doses over twice those reported in de novo initiations and may be a useful approach to quickly achieve the therapeutic benefits of oral treprostinil., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: CEM – United Therapeutics Corporation (research, consulting, speakers bureau, advisory board), Janssen (research, speakers bureau, advisory board), Insmed (research), Bayer (advisory board, steering committee); VF – United Therapeutics Corporation (research), Merck (research), Acceleron (research), Johnson & Johnson (research), Respira (research), Aerovate (research), Cereno (research), Abbott (research); JSS – United Therapeutics Corporation (research, speakers bureau), Bayer (research, speakers bureau); VB – United Therapeutics Corporation (consulting); JK – United Therapeutics Corporation (research, consulting, speakers bureau, advisory board), Janssen (research, consulting, speakers bureau, advisory board), Acceleron (research), Gossamer (research), Bayer (consulting, speakers bureau, advisory board); RZ – United Therapeutics Corporation (consulting), Bayer (consulting), Janssen (consulting), Johnson & Johnson (consulting); LMG – United Therapeutics Corporation (research, consulting, advisory board), Janssen (research, consulting), Gossamer bio (research, consulting), Merch (research, consulting), Bayer (research, consulting); JH – Acceleron (research), CardiolRx (research), Aaadi Bioscience (research), Astra Zeneca (spouse); JME – United Therapeutics Corporation (research, consulting), Janssen (research), Liquidia (research, consulting), Phase Bio (research), Gossamer Bio (research, consulting), Bayer (research, consulting), Acceleron (research), Altavant (research, consulting), Aerovate (research consulting), Tenax (research), Pharmosa (research), Merck (consulting); AR – United Therapeutics Corporation (consulting), Bayer (consulting), Actelion (consulting); DC, ES, SS, CMT, MB – United Therapeutics Corporation (employee); RJO – United Therapeutics Corporation (research, consulting), Janssen (research, consulting), Merck (research, consulting), Gossamer Bio (research), Insmed (research)., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Heart failure is a major health problem with significant economic burden in the United States. Educating heart failure dyads (heart failure patient and informal caregiver) is a relatively new domain and is being proposed by providers, policy makers, and third-party payors. Nurse-led dyad education can improve quality of life and reduce hospital admissions in the heart failure population., Objectives: This integrative literature review focused on evaluating design, delivery content, and outcomes of nurse-led dyadic educational interventions., Methods: PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases (1999 -2022) were searched for quantitative and qualitative studies that included these search terms: heart failure, dyads, nonmedical caregivers, caregivers, randomized controlled trials, nurse-led education, education., Results: The search yielded 92 articles. The results included seven randomized controlled trials and one pilot study conducted from 2005 to 2017. Sample sizes ranged from 20 to 155 dyads. Dyads who received education interventions had positive outcomes. Face-to-face coaching provided stronger outcomes. Interventions varied in length from baseline to three months, with post-intervention follow-ups from one to 12 months., Conclusions: A paucity of studies of nurse-led heart failure dyadic educational interventions have been reported in the literature. To advance the science and decrease heart failure readmissions, greater efforts to study and incorporate education and support for heart failure dyads is needed, along with assessment of both patient and caregiver outcomes., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Authors do not have a conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Distal pulmonary arterial remodeling and elevated pulmonary vascular resistance are characteristic of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Current approved vasodilator-specific PAH therapy that includes phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators, endothelin receptor antagonists, and prostanoids has demonstrated dramatic enhancement in functional capacity, quality of life, and invasive hemodynamics. However, none of these treatments are curative, underscoring the need to identify new pathophysiologic signaling pathways., Areas Covered: The author provides a comprehensive review on current knowledge and recent development in the understanding of PAH. Furthermore, the author discusses PAH potential genetic causes as well as novel molecular signaling pathways. This article also reviews the currently approved PAH specific therapy based on pivotal clinical trials and ongoing clinical trials using novel compounds that specifically target PAH pathogenesis., Expert Opinion: The discovery of novel signaling pathways - growth factors, tyrosine kinases, BMPs, estrogen, and serotonin - involved in the PAH pathobiology will lead within the next 5 years to the approval of new therapeutic agents targeting these different pathways. If proven beneficial, these new agents may reverse or at least prevent the progression of this devastating and lethal disease.

Introduction: We aimed to assess the impact of digoxin use following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation on clinical outcomes., Methods: Patients implanted with continuous flow LVADs at a single academic medical center and survived to initial hospital discharge were included in the analysis ( n  = 346). Clinical events were captured at a maximum of 2 years of follow up. Digoxin use was defined as 30-day continuous use post-LVAD. Negative binomial regression and Kaplan-Meier method were used to assess the association between digoxin use and clinical outcomes., Results: Mean age of the cohort was 56 years (±13) and 23% (79/346) were female sex. Digoxin was used in 144 patients (41.6%) for a median of 268 days (IQR 154, 616). Digoxin use was associated with a significant reduction in cumulative incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) (15% vs 26%, p  = 0.004). After adjusting for age, hypertension, post-operative hemoglobin, RDW, potassium, and GFR, and use of angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor, there remained a significant 47% reduction in GIB incidence in patients treated with digoxin. There was no significant difference in cumulative incidence in right ventricular failure (RVF) between the two groups. There was no difference in overall 2-year survival between groups., Conclusions: Digoxin use was associated with reduction in GIB events, but not in RVF or mortality. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to investigate optimal timing and patient population.

Although pulmonary function testing (PFT) is typically performed for heart transplant evaluation, the prognostic utility of PFTs after transplantation is unknown. We evaluated whether PFT parameters were correlated with outcomes following heart transplantation., Methods: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry data were utilized. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier method and compared via log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to evaluate univariate and multivariate predictors of survival., Results: Eight hundred two patients pretransplant PFT data were available for evaluation. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) < 50% predicted ( P < 0.0001), and forced vital capacity (FVC) < 50% predicted each had significantly higher mortality ( P  = 0.001) compared with patients with FEV1 or FVC 50%-80% or >80%. FEV1/FVC < 0.7 was not associated with increased mortality. FEV1 and FVC below 50% both predicted longer lengths of stay ( P  = 0.028 for FEV1 and P  = 0.0075 for FVC). After adjusting for male gender, age, body mass index, smoking history, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, creatinine, albumin, and total bilirubin, FEV1 < 50% (hazard ratio, 4.91; P  < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval, 2.69-8.94) and FVC < 50% (hazard ratio, 2.75; P  = 0.003; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-5.4) both remained independent predictors of mortality., Conclusions: Abnormal pulmonary function (FEV1 or FVC below 50% of predicted) pre-heart transplantation is associated with increased mortality and longer lengths of stay posttransplant., Competing Interests: The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive and devastating disease characterized by pulmonary artery vasoconstriction and vascular remodeling leading to vascular rarefaction with elevation of pulmonary arterial pressures and pulmonary vascular resistance. Often PAH will cause death from right heart failure. Current PAH-targeted therapies improve functional capacity, pulmonary hemodynamics and reduce hospitalization. Nevertheless, today PAH still remains incurable and is often refractory to medical therapy, underscoring the need for further research. Over the last three decades, PAH has evolved from a disease of unknown pathogenesis devoid of effective therapy to a condition whose cellular, genetic and molecular underpinnings are unfolding. This article provides an update on current knowledge and summarizes the progression in recent advances in pharmacological therapy in PAH., Competing Interests: Dr Zolty is a consultant at Actelion, Bayer, United Therapeutics, and Alnylam. The author report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2021 Zolty.)

Heart Failure (HF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the US. With aging of the US population, the public health burden of HF is enormous. We aimed to develop an ensemble prediction model for 30-day mortality after discharge using machine learning. Using an electronic medical records (EMR) database, all patients with a non-elective HF admission over 10 years (January 2001 - December 2010) within the Montefiore Medical Center (MMC) health system, in the Bronx, New York, were included. We developed an ensemble model for 30-day mortality after discharge and employed discrimination, range of prediction, Brier index and explained variance as metrics in assessing model performance. A total of 7,516 patients were included. The discrimination achieved by the ensemble model was higher 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.87) compared to the benchmark model 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.84). The ensemble model also exhibited a better range of prediction as well as a favorable profile with respect to the other metrics employed. In conclusion, an ensemble machine learning approach exhibited an improvement in performance compared to the benchmark logistic model in predicting all-cause mortality among HF patients within 30-days of discharge. Machine learning is a promising alternative approach for risk profiling of HF patients, and it enhances individualized patient management., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest No conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with an increase in the risk of COPD exacerbation, increased hospitalization, and worse survival in this patient population. No specific treatment is available for PH in COPD. However, reported out-of-proportion PH may benefit from a certain type of treatment. This study shows that the use of selexipag in the treatment of out-of-proportion PH in COPD patients was associated with an improvement in functional status evaluated by a six-minute walk test (6MWT) and a mean pulmonary artery pressure at 6 +/- 2 months of treatment., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2021, Abuserewa et al.)

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of intravenous levosimendan on hemodynamics and 6-min walk distance (6MWD) in patients with pulmonary hypertension and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (PH-HFpEF)., Background: There are no proven effective treatments for patients with PH-HFpEF., Methods: Patients with mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥35 mm Hg, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥20 mm Hg, and LVEF ≥40% underwent 6MWD and hemodynamic measurements at rest, during passive leg raise, and supine cycle exercise at baseline and after an open-label 24-h levosimendan infusion (0.1 μg/kg/min). Hemodynamic responders (those with ≥4 mm Hg reduction of exercise-PCWP) were randomized (double blind) to weekly levosimendan infusion (0.075 to 0.1 ug/kg/min for 24 h) or placebo for 5 additional weeks. The primary end point was exercise-PCWP, and key secondary end points included 6MWD and PCWP measured across all exercise stages., Results: Thirty-seven of 44 patients (84%) met responder criteria and were randomized to levosimendan (n = 18) or placebo (n = 19). Participants were 69 ± 9 years of age, 61% female, and with resting mPAP 41.0 ± 9.3 mm Hg and exercise-PCWP 36.8 ± 11.3 mm Hg. Compared with placebo, levosimendan did not significantly reduce the primary end point of exercise-PCWP at 6 weeks (-1.4 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -7.8 to 4.8; p = 0.65). However, levosimendan reduced PCWP measured across all exercise stages (-3.9 ± 2.0 mm Hg; p = 0.047). Levosimendan treatment resulted in a 29.3 m (95% CI: 2.5 to 56.1; p = 0.033) improvement in 6MWD compared with placebo., Conclusions: Six weeks of once-weekly levosimendan infusion did not affect exercise-PCWP but did reduce PCWP incorporating data from rest and exercise, in tandem with increased 6MWD. Further study of levosimendan is warranted as a therapeutic option for PH-HFpEF. (Hemodynamic Evaluation of Levosimendan in Patients With PH-HFpEF [HELP]; NCT03541603)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by TENAX Therapeutics. TENAX participated in the execution of the study. Data were collected and analyzed by a clinical research organization. Analysis and interpretation of the data were performed by an independent statistician and the investigators (no role of sponsor). The manuscript was prepared by the investigators. The sponsor was allowed to review the manuscript before submission but had no role in preparing or approval. Dr. Burkhoff has received an institutional research grant from TENAX Therapeutics; and advisory board/consulting from Impulse Dynamics, Corvia Medical, and Axon Therapies. Dr. Borlaug has received research grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01 HL128526, U01 HL125205), AstraZeneca, Corvia, Medtronic, Mesoblast, GlaxoSmithKline, and TENAX Therapeutics; and advisory board/consulting fees for Aria, Actelion, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Imbria, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and VADovations. Dr. Shah has received research grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01 HL107577, R01 HL127028, R01 HL140731, and R01 HL149423), American Heart Association (16SFRN28780016), Actelion, AstraZeneca, Corvia, Novartis, and Pfizer; and consulting fees from Abbott, Actelion, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Axon Therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cardiora, CVRx, Cytokinetics, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, Ironwood, Lilly, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Shifamed, TENAX, and United Therapeutics. Dr. Zolty has received research grants from the National Institutes of Health (P01 HL108797, R01 HL134905, R01 LM01), Actelion, TENAX Therapeutics, Gossamer Bio, Lung Biotech, and United Therapeutics; consulting/advisory board for Morphegen-IX, Vivus, Actelion, and Pfizer; and patent holder of FK506 for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Dr. Tedford has received institution research funding from TENAX Therapeutics as part of this study; has consulting relationships with Medtronic, Aria CV, Acceleron, Arena Pharmaceuticals, and United Therapeutics; is on the steering committees for Medtronic, Acceleron, and Abbott; on the research advisory board for Abiomed; and does hemodynamic core laboratory work for Actelion and Merck. Dr. Thenappan has received research grants from the Cardiovascular Medical Research and Education Fund, Lillehei Heart Institute High Risk and High Reward Award, United Therapeutics, and TENAX Therapeutics; and consulting/advisory board for United Therapeutics, Actelion, and Altavant Sciences. Dr. Zamanian has consulted for United Therapeutics, Actelion, and Alnylam. Dr. Mazurek has received advisory board honoraria from Actelion Pharmaceuticals and United Therapeutics; has received speaker honoraria from Abbott; and has received research support from Actelion, Complexa, and Corvia. Dr. Rich has consulted for Abbott, Medtronic, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Novartis. Dr. Simon has received research grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01 AG058659, P01 HL103455), Aadi Biosciences, and Novartis; and has received consulting fees from Actelion, Acceleron, Altavant, United Therapeutics. Dr. Chung has received consulting fees from Abbott, Medtonic, Intershunt, LivaNova, CVRx, and EBR. Dr. Raza has reported that he has no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose. Dr. Majure has received a research grant from TENAX Therapeutics. Dr. Lewis has received research grants from the National Institutes of Health (1R01HL131029, R01HL151841, and AHA GPSGC24800006), Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Corvia, Cytokinetics, and Novartis; and consulting/advisory board for American Reagent, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Ironwood, Merck, Novartis, and Pfizer. Dr. Preston has received research grants from Acceleron, Actelion, Complexa, PhaseBio, United Therapeutics, and TENAX Therapeutics; steering committee for Acceleron, Actelion, and United Therapeutics; is on the consulting/advisory board for Actelion, Gilead, Liquidia, and United Therapeutics; and data and safety monitoring board for Pfizer. Dr. Rich has received consulting from TENAX Therapeutics., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

While cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation occurs in immunocompetent patients who are critically ill and has been associated with worse outcomes, very few cases of CMV reactivation have been reported following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for CMV reactivation following LVAD implantation. Retrospective chart review of patients who had undergone LVAD implantation between July 2004 and December 2018 was performed. Cases with CMV reactivation post-LVAD were randomly matched (1:2) by sex, LVAD type, and implant year with controls utilizing SAS macros. Fisher's exact and paired sample t-tests were performed to evaluate for differences between categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Days to reactivation post-LVAD implantation were calculated in cases, and the corresponding times post-LVAD implantation were determined in control patients for variable comparisons. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Of the 349 patients reviewed, 208 (59.6%) patients were seropositive for CMV before LVAD implantation. Of these 208 patients, eight (3.8%) had CMV reactivation following LVAD implantation. The median time to CMV reactivation following LVAD implantation was 21.5 days (range, 6-177). Six (75%) patients had CMV viremia, and the other two had colitis and pneumonia without viremia. In comparison to controls, patients with CMV had higher creatinine levels (p = 0.039) and higher RDW (p = 0.05) and were more likely to have received steroids within the previous week (p = 0.028) and to have concurrent bacterial infection (p = 0.001). CMV reactivation following LVAD implantation is more frequent than expected. Early testing, diagnosis, and treatment in at-risk patients (i.e., renal failure, steroid use, elevated RDW) might improve clinical outcomes., Competing Interests: The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. The authors received no internal or external funding to conduct this study., (Copyright © ASAIO 2020.)

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common cause of morbidity among patients supported by left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). The aim of this study was to identify if pre-LVAD right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is associated with risk of GIB after LVAD implantation. Of 398 patients implanted with LVADs between July 2008 and July 2016, 130 (33%) developed GIB at a median of 2.6 months following LVAD implantation. Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) were found in 42 (34%) GIB patients. Patients with GIB were older and more likely to have hypertension, diabetes, and ischemic cardiomyopathy. On pre-LVAD echocardiography, GIB patients had increased RV diastolic dimension (4.7 ± 0.8 vs. 4.4 ± 0.9 cm, p = 0.02), a higher rate of greater than mild tricuspid valve (TV) regurgitation (73 [60%] vs. 120 [47%], p = 0.006), and underwent TV repair more often (38 [30%] vs. 43 [16%], p = 0.0006) during LVAD implantation. After multivariable adjustment, preoperative greater than mild RV enlargement (hazard ratio [HR] 2.32, 95% CI 1.12-5.03; p = 0.03), TV regurgitation (HR 1.83, CI 1.02-3.44; p = 0.01), and TV repair (HR 3.76, confidence interval [CI] 1.02-4.44; p = 0.01) remained associated with risk of GIB. This finding was driven by the AVM-GIB subgroup. Preoperative RV enlargement and TV regurgitation are associated with post-LVAD AVM-related GIB., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2020.)

Cardiogenic shock remains one of the most challenging clinical syndromes in modern medicine. Mechanical support is being increasingly used in the management of cardiogenic shock. Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is one of the earliest and most widely used types of mechanical circulatory support. The device acts by external counterpulsation and uses systolic unloading and diastolic augmentation of aortic pressure to improve hemodynamics. Although IABP provides less hemodynamic support when compared with newer mechanical circulatory support devices, it can still be the mechanical support device of choice in appropriate situations because of its relative simplicity of insertion and removal, need for smaller size vascular access and better safety profile. In this review, we discuss the equipment, procedural and technical aspects, hemodynamic effects, indications, evidence, current status and recent advances in the use of IABP in cardiogenic shock.