Search

In 2010, the FOLFIRINOX regimen (bolus and infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) emerged as a new option in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and a good performance status. However, at that time, some doubts were raised regarding safety issues. Similarly, no data on FOLFIRINOX were published in patients with unresectable/locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. This article presents the available experience with FOLFIRINOX outside clinical trials in metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients. The safety of the regimen in patients with biliary stents and in previously treated patients is also described. FOLFIRINOX usage in clinical practice, including modification of the regimen (omission of bolus 5-fluorouracil; FOLFOXIRI regimen), is also presented. These data suggest that a phase III randomized study is warranted to further explore the role of FOLFIRINOX in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a study on the potential of alterations of the HER signaling pathways to predict distant metastases in locally advanced rectal cancer. It investigated the association of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), HER2, HER3 and HER4 gene expression with distant metastasis in rectal cancer patients in France. Analysis of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression of four HER genes and the frequency of PTEN allelic loss and KRAS/BRAF mutations was made in pretreatment biopsies.

A regimen consisting of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-6) is widely used in France in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). The aim of our study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus FOLFOX-6 for this indication. Patients were randomly assigned to receive XELOX or FOLFOX-6 for 6 months. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) in the per-protocol (PP) population; however, progression-free and overall survival (OS), time to response and response duration were also assessed. A total of 306 patients were enrolled (XELOX n = 156; FOLFOX-6 n = 150). ORR was 42 and 46% with XELOX and FOLFOX-6, respectively, in the PP population. The difference between groups was 4.7%; the upper limit of the unilateral 95% confidence interval (14.4%) was below the non-inferiority margin of 15%. In the intent-to-treat population, median progression-free survival was 8.8 months with XELOX and 9.3 months with FOLFOX-6, and median OS was 19.9 and 20.5 months, respectively. XELOX patients had significantly more grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (12% vs. 5%) and diarrhoea (14% vs. 7%), but significantly less grade 3/4 neutropenia (5% vs. 47%), febrile neutropenia (0% vs. 6%) and neuropathy (11% vs. 26%) than FOLFOX-6 patients. We conclude that XELOX is non-inferior in terms of efficacy to FOLFOX-6 in the first-line treatment of MCRC, but has a different toxicity profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Irinotecan has an important place in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. It was initially administered as monotherapy, but is now generally used in combination with 5-fluorouracil or targeted therapies (cetuximab or bevacizumab), with various doses. We here review the main studies assessing irinotecan doses escalation, and discuss the potent advantages of this escalation. Several studies have demonstrated a dose–intensity relationship for irinotecan, and high doses (up to 600 mg/m2 as monotherapy, 260 mg/m2 in combination therapy) have been used with satisfactory safety and higher objective response rates. It is possible that, in practice, some patients receive insufficient doses of irinotecan. Dose escalation could be considered in carefully selected patients: young patients with a good performance status and normal liver function. This approach could be useful in patients with liver metastases, which may become resectable in the case of a major tumour response. It is wise to perform UGT1A1 genotyping prior to dose escalation to detect patients at high risk of toxicity (genotype 7/7). The role of another laboratory parameter, which needs to be evaluated is the KRAS status of the tumour. A KRAS mutation confers resistance to cetuximab, which reduces treatment options, especially in first-line. However, in the CRYSTAL trial comparing FOLFIRI to FOLFIRI-cetuximab as first-line therapy, the presence of a KRAS mutation did not appear to influence the efficacy of FOLFIRI. The value of irinotecan dose escalation needs to be determined in this setting. Irinotecan dose escalation is potentially of interest in highly selected patients, but this concept is only based on phase I or II trials and must be validated by a randomized trial. Its value regarding other regimens such as FOLFIRINOX or combinations with targeted therapies also needs to be determined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The last two decades have seen a transformation in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), as first irinotecan and later oxaliplatin, capecitabine and the three approved targeted therapies have been added to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as options for treatment of this tumour. These developments have brought with them a significant improvement in outlook for many patients diagnosed with mCRC, as median overall survival (OS) has increased from approximately 12 months to over 2 years. With the continued high level of interest in searching for new drugs and regimens for improving the management of mCRC, as reflected in the large number of studies undertaken, further improvements can be expected in the near future. Doublet chemotherapy is now accepted as the standard of treatment for many patients. Studies are currently investigating the benefits of using combinations of three cytotoxic agents as well as exploring the impact that the addition of one or more targeted agents to combination chemotherapy can have on improving mCRC care. Promising results have already been reported in phase III studies, although further studies are required to determine the best regimens for particular settings. In addition to considering the clinical setting, it may also be relevant to consider tailoring therapy to the individual patient, based on the presence or absence of biomarkers predictive of response to a particular therapy. There is much interest in this approach and retrospective studies have identified a number of response markers to particular regimens. Prospective studies are required to further evaluate such markers and determine their possible value in the clinic. It can be hoped that such developments will help improve the outlook of many patients diagnosed with mCRC in the future. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Irinotecan at 180 mg/m² combined with an infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) regimen (FOLFIRI) is a standard first line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This phase II study aimed to assess whether increasing the irinotecan dose in the first line FOLFIRI regimen would benefit mCRC patients. Patients received FOLFIRI every 2 weeks for up to six cycles, comprising a 5-FU/LV regimen combined with irinotecan at 180 mg/m² (cycle 1), increasing to 220 mg/m² (cycle 2) and 260 mg/m² (cycle 3 and subsequent cycles) dependent on toxicity. Efficacy and safety were determined in the intention to treat (ITT) population and in patients able to receive irinotecan at 260 mg/m² for at least four cycles [high-dose (HD) population]. Fifty-four eligible patients were included. Among them, 44 (81.5%) formed the HD population. The ITT objective response rate was 48% (90%CI: 36–60) with 25/26 of the responses in the HD population. The disease control rate was 76% (90%CI: 65–85) and median overall survival was 20.4 months (90%CI: 6.4–27.1). The main grade 3/4 toxicities (ITT/HD populations) were neutropenia (61%/59%), and diarrhoea (18%/11%), respectively. This study confirms the feasibility of increasing the standard dose of the irinotecan component of FOLFIRI to 260 mg/m², for more than 80% of patients but does not support a clear advantage of this strategy on unselected mCRC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Irinotecan is extensively metabolized into at least four compounds and previous pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies have given varying results. We hypothesized that saliva, a noninvasive, safe and painless biological sampling process, could be a good predictor of the behavior of irinotecan and its metabolites.Methods: Thirty-five patients with metastatic digestive cancer were treated with a Folfiri regimen every 2 weeks. The irinotecan-administered dose was 180 mg/m(2); 17 patients participated in a dose-escalating study. Irinotecan and its metabolites (SN-38, SN-38G, APC, NPC) were quantified in plasma and saliva by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection.Results: The mean irinotecan systemic clearance and steady-state volume of distribution values were 14.3 l/h/m(2) and 211 l/m(2), respectively. The intrapatient variability (22-28%) was far lower than the interindividual variability (33-88%). Age and weight were the two physiological parameters that influenced drug disposition. For irinotecan, SN-38, APC and NPC, similar pharmacokinetic profiles were observed from plasma and saliva data. The saliva/plasma AUC ratios averaged 1 for irinotecan, 0.3 for SN-38, 0.17 for APC and 0.27 for NPC. Neutropenia, diarrhea and nausea were the main toxicities encountered. From both plasma and saliva data, the percentage decrease in neutrophil count appeared to be related to irinotecan and SN-38 AUCs.Conclusions: All these findings provide a rationale for an individual adaptation of irinotecan dosing. In case of difficult venous access, the titration of irinotecan and of its active metabolite SN-38 in saliva may prove relevant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of surgery after preoperative radiochemotherapy (PRCT) for esophageal cancer. This retrospective study included 88 patients scan between 1992 and 2000. The median follow-up was 55.7 months (3.3–104.1 months). Surgical mortality was 15.9%. Multivariate analysis found that the following were risk factors for surgical morality: γ-glutamyltransferase level > 75 UI/ml (p = 0.007), weight loss = 10% (p = 0.05), and digestive toxicity World Health Organization grade III or IV during PRCT (p = 0.0191). The median overall survival was 24.9 momhs. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were, respectively, 33.1% and 33.2% Complete responder patients had a 71.8% 5-year US (p = 0.01) and a 71.8% 5-year DFS (p = 0.009). The rate of recurrence was 37.5%. Multivariate analysis found that female gender (p = 0.031), weight loss = 10% (p = 0.03), preoperative computed tomography scan bronchial contact (p = 0.01), and N+ status (pN+) at pathology examination (p = 0.0001) were predictors of poor oncologic results. Patients with high preoperative risk or surgical mortality need to be selected for Intensive perioperative management. In association with surgery. PRCT improves the local control, DFS, and OS of responder patients. Morphologic evaluation for staging esophageal cancer in predicting the pathologic response after PRCT is poor or controversial. Only surgical resection can provide accurate prognostic information for staging esophageal cancer and improving local control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Human monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) are needed for colon cancer radioimmunotherapy (RIT) to allow for repeated injections. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) being the reference antigen for immunotargeting of these tumors, we developed human anti-CEA MAbs. Methods: XenoMouse®-G2 animals were immunized with CEA. Among all the antibodies produced, two of them, VG-IgG2κ. and VG-IgM, were selected for characterization in vitro in comparison with the human-mouse chimeric anti-CEA MAb X4 using flow cytometry, surface plasmon resonance, and binding to radiolabeled soluble CEA and in vivo in human colon carcinoma LS174T bearing nude mice. Results: Flow cytometry analysis demonstrated binding of MAbs on CEA-expressing cells without any binding on NCA-expressing human granulocytes. In a competitive binding assay using five reference MAbs, directed against the five Gold CEA epitopes, VG-IgG2κ. and VG-IgM were shown to be directed against the Gold 4 epitope. The affinities of purified VG-IgG2κ. and VG-IgM were determined to be 0.19 ± 0.06 x 108 M-1 and 1.30 ± 0.06 x 108 M-1, respectively, as compared with 0.61 ± 0.05 x 108 M-1 for the reference MAb X4. In a soluble phase assay, the binding capacities of VG-IgG2κ. and VG-IgM to soluble CEA were clearly lower than that of the control chimeric MAb X4. A human MAb concentration of about 10-7 M was needed to precipitate approximatively 1 ng 125I-rhCEA as compared with 10-9 M for MAb X4, suggesting a preferential binding of the human MAbs to solid phase CEA. In vivo, 24 h post-injection, 125I-VG-IgG2κ. demonstrated a high tumor uptake (25.4 ± 7.3%ID/g), close to that of 131I-X4 (21.7 ± 7.2%ID/g). At 72 h post-injection, 125I-VG-IgG2κ. was still concentrated in the tumor (28.4 ± 11.0%ID/g) whereas the tumor concentration of 131I-X4 was significantly reduced (12.5 ± 4.8%ID/g). At no time after injection was there any accumulation of the radiolabeled MAbs in normal tissues. A pertinent analysis of VGIgM biodistribution was not possible in this mouse model in which IgM displays a very short half-life due to poly-Ig receptor expression in the liver. Conclusion: Our human anti-CEA IgG2κ. is a promising candidate for radioimmunotherapy in intact form, as F(ab')2 fragments, or as a bispecific antibody. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim. The aim of this phase II study was to determine the efficacy and tolerability of the bimonthly, pharmacokinetically intensified LV5FU2 regimen in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancers. Methods. A total of 53 patients (23% second-line; 25 male/28 female; mean age 67 years; WHO performance status 0 in 38, 1 in 10 and 2 in 5) were treated in cycle 1 with the standard LV5FU2 regimen (leucovorin 200 mg/m2 per day followed by a 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m2 per day and a 22-h 5-FU continuous infusion 600 mg/m2 per day for two consecutive days every 2 weeks), and the AUC in mg·h/l·m2 was calculated. For cycle 2, according to a predefined schedule depending on the cycle-1 AUC value, in the absence of grade 3 toxicity, the 5-FU infusion dose was increased by 150% for AUC ≤5, by 100% for AUC >5–10, by 50% for AUC >10–15, and by 25% for AUC >15–20. 5-FU plasma concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. A Bayesian methodology was used to assess individual pharmacokinetic parameters using the NONMEM computer program. Results. Among the 53 eligible patients, 87% (per-protocol population) received an increased dose in cycle 2 and 72% received the same dose. The median relative dose intensity was 1.28 (range 0.5–1.54) compared with the non-adapted theoretical total 5-FU dose. The objective response rate was 37% (95% CI 23–50%) in the intention-to-treat population and 47% (95% CI 29–65%) in the first-line per-protocol population. The median response duration was 10.4 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were, respectively, 7 and 18.6 months. PFS and OS in first-line per-protocol patients were, respectively, 9.2 and 20 months. No deaths were attributed to toxicity of 5-FU despite the high doses administered. Of the 53 patients, 19% experienced gastrointestinal and 30% haematological grade 3/4 toxicities. Hand-foot syndrome was common but mild (grade 3 in one patient). Conclusions. This strategy could be compared in a phase III trial with the standard LV5FU2 regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: This prospective, nonrandomized study evaluates, with a seven-year median follow-up, the morbidity and the functional and oncologic results of conservative surgery after high-dose radiation for cancer of the lower third of the rectum of patients who would otherwise have undergone abdominoperineal resection. METHODS: Between June 1990 and June 1996, 43 patients with distal rectal adenocarcinoma were treated by preoperative radiotherapy (40 + 20 Gy delivered with three fields) and curative surgery. The mean distance from the anal verge was 50 (range, 25–60) mm, and none of the tumors was fixed (15 percent T2N0, 53 percent T3N0, 32 percent T3N1). RESULTS: Postoperative mortality (2 percent) and morbidity (35 percent) were not increased by high-dose preoperative radiation. Conservative surgery was done in 30 patients (70 percent: 26 coloanal anastomoses and 4 low stapled anastomoses). After conservative surgery, long-term functional results showed 30 percent complete continence and 20 percent serious incontinence. Four patients had local recurrence as first development (13 percent). The seven-year overall survival rate was 53 percent, 62 percent after conservative surgery and 31 percent after abdominoperineal resection. The univariate analysis underscores the tumor response impact on long-term survival (pT<3 = 81 percent; pT3 = 35 percent; P = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: These long-term results confirm the feasibility of conservative surgery for low rectal carcinoma after high-dose radiation. A prospective multicentric trial began in France in June 1996 to evaluate the reproducibility of these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: In the present work, we describe (for the first time) the use of the transmembrane protein, CD44v6, to detect CTCs from blood samples of several patients with colorectal or breast cancer. We used CD44v6 antibodies to demonstrate that live CTCs can be specifically purified from CRC patient blood samples via magnetic bead- or FACS-based isolation techniques. Finally, we demonstrated that CD44v6-positive CTCs rarely expressed EpCam, which is currently the gold standard to enumerate CTCs, suggesting the need to use a combination of markers for a more comprehensive view of CTC heterogeneity. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are promising diagnostic and prognostic tools for clinical use. In several cancers, including colorectal and breast, the CTC load has been associated with a therapeutic response as well as progression-free and overall survival. However, counting and isolating CTCs remains sub-optimal because they are currently largely identified by epithelial markers such as EpCAM. New, complementary CTC surface markers are therefore urgently needed. We previously demonstrated that a splice variant of CD44, CD44 variable alternative exon 6 (CD44v6), is highly and specifically expressed by CTC cell lines derived from blood samples in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Two different approaches—immune detection coupled with magnetic beads and fluorescence-activated cell sorting—were optimized to purify CTCs from patient blood samples based on high expressions of CD44v6. We revealed the potential of the CD44v6 as a complementary marker to EpCAM to detect and purify CTCs in colorectal cancer blood samples. Furthermore, this marker is not restricted to colorectal cancer since CD44v6 is also expressed on CTCs from breast cancer patients. Overall, these results strongly suggest that CD44v6 could be useful to enumerate and purify CTCs from cancers of different origins, paving the way to more efficacious combined markers that encompass CTC heterogeneity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Although the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear, it is a therapeutic option often considered in patients not eligible to or recurring after other local therapies. Liver SBRT can be delivered using a wide range of techniques and linear accelerators. We report the first evaluation for HCC of SBRT using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and real-time adaptive tumor gating, which is a mainly completely non-invasive procedure (no fiducial markers for 65.2% of the patients). Our study showed that this SBRT technique has very favorable outcomes with optimal local control and a low toxicity rate. Liver SBRT is a therapeutic option for the treatment of HCC in patients not eligible for other local therapies. We retrospectively report the outcomes of a cohort of consecutive patients treated with SBRT for HCC at the Montpellier Cancer Institute. Between March 2013 and December 2018, 66 patients were treated with image-guided liver SBRT using VMAT and real-time adaptive tumor gating in our institute. The main endpoints considered in this study were local control, disease-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. The median follow-up was 16.8 months. About 66.7% had prior liver treatment. Most patients received 50 Gy in five fractions of 10 Gy. No patient had local recurrence. Overall survival and disease-free survival were, respectively, 83.9% and 46.7% at one year. In multivariate analysis, the diameter of the lesions was a significant prognostic factor associated with disease-free survival (HR = 2.57 (1.19–5.53) p = 0.02). Regarding overall survival, the volume of PTV was associated with lower overall survival (HR = 2.84 (1.14–7.08) p = 0.025). No grade 3 toxicity was observed. One patient developed a grade 4 gastric ulcer, despite the dose constraints being respected. Image-guided liver SBRT with VMAT is an effective and safe treatment in patients with inoperable HCC, even in heavily pre-treated patients. Further prospective evaluation will help to clarify the role of SBRT in the management of HCC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The combination of bevacizumab and FOLFIRINOX is used in patients with RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (RASm-mCRC). Regorafenib, an oral multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has antiangiogenic properties, cytostatic effects and also true cytotoxic effects, unlike bevacizumab. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the regorafenib-FOLFIRINOX combination in patients with RASm-mCRC. Methods: The FOLFIRINOX-R trial was a phase 1/2 study where the dose-escalation part (3 + 3 design with three dose levels, DLs) was completed before its early termination. FOLFIRINOX (14-day cycle) included oxaliplatin (standard dose), folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan (150 or 180 mg/m²). Regorafenib (120 or 160 mg daily) was given from day 4 to day 10 of each cycle. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was studied in the first three cycles. Eligibility criteria included ECOG performance status ≤ 1 and not previously treated RASm-mCRC. Results: Thirteen patients (median age: 65 years; min-max: 40–76) were enrolled. DLT could not be evaluated in one patient (DL3) due to poor observance. The median treatment duration and median follow-up were 6.2 (min-max: 2.3–10) and 13.4 (min-max: 3.8–18.0) months, respectively. Dose was modified in 12/13 (92%) patients. One grade 3 hypokalemia occurred at DL2. MTD was not reached at DL3. Grade 3 diarrhea was recorded in 7/13 patients (13 events) equally distributed in all DLs. Conclusion: The RP2D for this regorafenib-FFX combination could not be determined due to a high prevalence of grade 3 diarrhea related to treatment as advised by our Independent Data Monitoring Committee. Trial registration numbers: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03828799. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

According to clinical guidelines, the occurrence of very early-onset breast cancer (VEO-BC) (diagnosed ≤ age 30 years) or VEO ovarian cancer (VEO-OC) (diagnosed ≤ age 40 years) in families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm) prompts advancing the age of risk-reducing strategies in relatives. This study aimed to assess the relation between the occurrence of VEO-BC or VEO-OC in families with BRCAm and age at BC or OC diagnosis in relatives. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 448 consecutive families with BRCAm from 2003 to 2018. Mean age and 5-year–span distribution of age at BC or OC in relatives were compared in families with or without VEO-BC or VEO-OC. Conditional probability calculation and Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel chi-square tests were used to investigate early-onset cancer occurrence in relatives of VEO-BC and VEO-OC cases. Overall, 15% (19/245) of families with BRCA1m and 9% (19/203) with BRCA2m featured at least one case of VEO-BC; 8% (37/245) and 2% (2/203) featured at least one case of VEO-OC, respectively. The cumulative prevalence of VEO-BC was 5.1% (95% CI 3.6–6.6) and 2.5% (95% CI 1.4–3.6) for families with BRCA1m and BRCA2m, respectively. The distribution of age and mean age at BC diagnosis in relatives did not differ by occurrence of VEO-BC for families with BRCA1m or BRCA2m. Conditional probability calculations did not show an increase of early-onset BC in VEO-BC families with BRCA1m or BRCA2m. Conversely, the probability of VEO-BC was not increased in families with early-onset BC. VEO-BC or VEO-OC occurrence may not be related to young age at BC or OC onset in relatives in families with BRCAm. This finding—together with a relatively high VEO-BC risk for women with BRCAm—advocates for MRI breast screening from age 25 regardless of family history. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) as a "real-time liquid biopsy" in epithelial tumors for personalized medicine has received tremendous attention over the past years, with important clinical implications. In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the CellSearch® system has already demonstrated its prognostic value and interest in monitoring treatment response, but the number of recovered CTCs remains low. In this article, we evaluate the early prognostic and predictive value of viable CTCs in patients with mCRC treated with FOLFIRI–bevacizumab with an alternative approach, the functional EPISPOT assay. This study shows that viable CTCs can be detected in patients with mCRC before and during FOLFIRI–bevacizumab treatment and that CTC detection at D28 and the D0–D28 CTC kinetics evaluated with the EPISPOT assay are associated with response to treatment. Background: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) allow the real-time monitoring of tumor course and treatment response. This prospective multicenter study evaluates and compares the early predictive value of CTC enumeration with EPISPOT, a functional assay that detects only viable CTCs, and with the CellSearch® system in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: Treatment-naive patients with mCRC and measurable disease (RECIST criteria 1.1) received FOLFIRI–bevacizumab until progression or unacceptable toxicity. CTCs in peripheral blood were enumerated at D0, D14, D28, D42, and D56 (EPISPOT assay) and at D0 and D28 (CellSearch® system). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed with the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. Results: With the EPISPOT assay, at least 1 viable CTC was detected in 21% (D0), 15% (D14), 12% (D28), 10% (D42), and 12% (D56) of 155 patients. PFS and OS were shorter in patients who remained positive, with viable CTCs between D0 and D28 compared with the other patients (PFS = 7.36 vs. 9.43 months, p = 0.0161 and OS = 25.99 vs. 13.83 months, p = 0.0178). The prognostic and predictive values of ≥3 CTCs (CellSearch® system) were confirmed. Conclusions: CTC detection at D28 and the D0–D28 CTC dynamics evaluated with the EPISPOT assay were associated with outcomes and may predict response to treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The management of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and potentially resectable liver metastases (LM) requires quick assessment of mutational status and of response to pre-operative systemic therapy. In a prospective phase II trial (NCT01442935), we investigated the clinical validity of circulating tumor cell (CTC) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection. CRC patients with potentially resectable LM were treated with first-line triplet or doublet chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy. CTC (Cellsearch®) and Kirsten RAt Sarcoma (KRAS) ctDNA (droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR)) levels were assessed at inclusion, after 4 weeks of therapy and before LM surgery. 153 patients were enrolled. The proportion of patients with high CTC counts (≥3 CTC/7.5mL) decreased during therapy: 19% (25/132) at baseline, 3% (3/108) at week 4 and 0/57 before surgery. ctDNA detection sensitivity at baseline was 91% (N=42/46) and also decreased during treatment. Interestingly, persistently detectable KRAS ctDNA (p = 0.01) at 4 weeks was associated with a lower R0/R1 LM resection rate. Among patients who had a R0/R1 LM resection, those with detectable ctDNA levels before liver surgery had a shorter overall survival (p < 0.001). In CRC patients with limited metastatic spread, ctDNA could be used as liquid biopsy tool. Therefore, ctDNA detection could help to select patients eligible for LM resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inactivating mutations of the tumor suppressor Adenomatosis Polyposis Coli (APC), which are found in familial adenomatosis polyposis and in 80% of sporadic colorectal cancers (CRC), result in constitutive activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and tumor development in the intestine. These mutations disconnect the Wnt/β-catenin pathway from its Wnt extracellular signal by inactivating the APC/GSK3-β/axin destruction complex of β-catenin. This results in sustained nuclear accumulation of β-catenin, followed by β-catenin-dependent co-transcriptional activation of Wnt/β-catenin target genes. Thus, mechanisms acting downstream of APC, such as those controlling β-catenin stability and/or co-transcriptional activity, are attractive targets for CRC treatment. Protein Kinase C-α (PKCα) phosphorylates the orphan receptor RORα that then inhibits β-catenin co-transcriptional activity. PKCα also phosphorylates β-catenin, leading to its degradation by the proteasome. Here, using both in vitro (DLD-1 cells) and in vivo (C57BL/6J mice) PKCα knock-in models, we investigated whether enhancing PKCα function could be beneficial in CRC treatment. We found that PKCα is infrequently mutated in CRC samples, and that inducing PKCα function is not deleterious for the normal intestinal epithelium. Conversely, di-terpene ester-induced PKCα activity triggers CRC cell death. Together, these data indicate that PKCα is a relevant drug target for CRC treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a local treatment that provides good local control and low toxicity. We present the first clinical results from our prospective registry of stereotactic MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) for liver metastases. All patients treated for liver metastases were included in this prospective registry study. Stereotactic MRgRT indication was confirmed by multidisciplinary specialized tumor boards. The primary endpoints were acute and late toxicities. The secondary endpoints were survival outcomes (local control, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, intrahepatic relapse-free survival). Twenty-six consecutive patients were treated for thirty-one liver metastases between October 2019 and April 2022. The median prescribed dose was 50 Gy (40–60) in 5 fractions. No severe acute MRgRT-related toxicity was noted. Acute and late gastrointestinal and liver toxicities were low and mostly unrelated to MRgRT. Only 5 lesions (16.1%) required daily adaptation because of the proximity of organs at risk (OAR). With a median follow-up time of 17.3 months since MRgRT completion, the median OS, 1-year OS and 2-year OS rates were 21.7 months, 83.1% (95% CI: 55.3–94.4%) and 41.6% (95% CI: 13.5–68.1%), respectively, from MRgRT completion. The local control at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years was 90.9% (95% CI: 68.3–97.7%). To our knowledge, we report the largest series of stereotactic MRgRT for liver metastases. The treatment was well-tolerated and achieved a high LC rate. Distant relapse remains a challenge in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: While the role of radiation therapy in the management of pancreatic tumors remains controversial, new technological modalities allow for safer and more effective radiotherapy treatments. Stereotactic MR-guided Adaptive RadioTherapy (SMART) is an attractive treatment for pancreatic tumors, taking advantage of this challenging tumor location from the continuous image guidance and target tracking, as well as the daily adaptive process. We report in this prospective registry study the largest series of pancreatic SMART to date. Our study confirms the interest of this technique with a high therapeutic index since it is very well tolerated and gives encouraging results in our selected population. Pancreatic SMART could contribute to the improvement of the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, whose prognosis remains poor. Its exact place remains to be confirmed in further studies. Introduction: Stereotactic MR-guided Adaptive RadioTherapy (SMART) is a novel process to treat pancreatic tumors. We present an update of the data from our prospective registry of SMART for pancreatic tumors. Materials and methods: After the establishment of the SMART indication in a multidisciplinary board, we included all patients treated for pancreatic tumors. Primary endpoints were acute and late toxicities. Secondary endpoints were survival outcomes (local control, overall survival, distant metastasis free survival) and dosimetric advantages of adaptive process on targets volumes and OAR. Results: We included seventy consecutive patients in our cohort between October 2019 and April 2022. The prescribed dose was 50 Gy in 5 consecutive fractions. No severe acute SMART related toxicity was noted. Acute and late Grade ≤ 2 gastro intestinal were low. Daily adaptation significantly improved PTV and GTV coverage as well as OAR sparing. With a median follow-up of 10.8 months since SMART completion, the median OS, 6-months OS, and 1-year OS were 20.9 months, 86.7% (95% CI: (75–93%), and 68.6% (95% CI: (53–80%), respectively, from SMART completion. Local control at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were, respectively, 96.8 % (95% CI: 88–99%), 86.5 (95% CI: 68–95%), and 80.7% (95% CI: 59–92%). There was no grade > 2 late toxicities. Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancers (LAPC) and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancers (BRPC) patients (52 patients) had a median OS, 6-months OS, and 1-year OS from SMART completion of 15.2 months, 84.4% (95% CI: (70–92%)), and 60.5% (95% CI: (42–75%)), respectively. The median OS, 1-year OS, and 2-year OS from initiation of induction chemotherapy were 22.3 months, 91% (95% CI: (78–97%)), and 45.8% (95% CI: (27–63%)), respectively. Twenty patients underwent surgical resection (38.7 % of patients with initially LAPC) with negative margins (R0). Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the largest series of SMART for pancreatic tumors. The treatment was well tolerated with only low-grade toxicities. Long-term OS and LC rates were achieved. SMART achieved high secondary resection rates in LAPC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Nuclear receptors PXR (pregnane X receptor, NR1I2) and CAR (constitutive androstane receptor, NR1I3) are key regulators of irinotecan metabolism, and ligand-dependent modulation of their activity leads to significant drug-drug interactions. Because genetic polymorphisms can also affect the activity of these xenobiotic-sensing receptors, we hypothesized that they could contribute to the interpatient variability of irinotecan pharmacokinetics and to the toxicity of irinotecan-based regimens.Patients and Methods: In a cohort of 109 metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with irinotecan (180 mg/m(2)) in combination with other drugs, associations were assessed between 21 selected single nucleotide polymorphisms of NR1I2 or NR1I3 and pharmacokinetic parameters or toxicity of irinotecan and its metabolites.Results: After adjustment of the tests by the UGT1A1*28 genotype and correction for multiple testing, the A allele of NR1I2-rs10934498 was associated with a decreased exposition and an increased degradation of SN-38, the active metabolite (p = 0.009 and p = 0.017, respectively). The risk of hematological toxicity was associated with NR1I2-rs10934498 and NR1I2-rs2472677 (p = 0.009 and p = 0.003, respectively).Conclusion: Our results reveal for the first time the involvement of NR1I2 in the pharmacogenetics of irinotecan and suggest that it may help to predict the toxicity of low-dose irinotecan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Data are lacking on the efficacy and safety of a combination chemotherapy regimen consisting of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX) as compared with gemcitabine as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Methods: We randomly assigned 342 patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1 (on a scale of 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of illness) to receive FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, 85 mg per square meter of body-surface area; irinotecan, 180 mg per square meter; leucovorin, 400 mg per square meter; and fluorouracil, 400 mg per square meter given as a bolus followed by 2400 mg per square meter given as a 46-hour continuous infusion, every 2 weeks) or gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg per square meter weekly for 7 of 8 weeks and then weekly for 3 of 4 weeks. Six months of chemotherapy were recommended in both groups in patients who had a response. The primary end point was overall survival. Results: The median overall survival was 11.1 months in the FOLFIRINOX group as compared with 6.8 months in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio for death, 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 0.73; P<0.001). Median progression-free survival was 6.4 months in the FOLFIRINOX group and 3.3 months in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio for disease progression, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.59; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 31.6% in the FOLFIRINOX group versus 9.4% in the gemcitabine group (P<0.001). More adverse events were noted in the FOLFIRINOX group; 5.4% of patients in this group had febrile neutropenia. At 6 months, 31% of the patients in the FOLFIRINOX group had a definitive degradation of the quality of life versus 66% in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.70; P<0.001). Conclusions: As compared with gemcitabine, FOLFIRINOX was associated with a survival advantage and had increased toxicity. FOLFIRINOX is an option for the treatment of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and good performance status. (Funded by the French government and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00112658.) N Engl J Med 2011;364:1817-25. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This longitudinal prospective and observational study was designed to identify fatigue trajectories during a 6-month period of chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, and examine the psychosocial factors predicting these trajectories. Associations between fatigue and survival were also investigated.Methods: A total of 169 patients (Mage = 64.36 years, SD = 10.5) reported their fatigue levels every 2 weeks for 6 months. Psychological variables (anxiety, depression, internal control, and coping) were assessed at baseline. A Growth Mixture Model was used to identify latent trajectories of fatigue, and a multinomial logistic regression tested covariate predictors of patients' trajectories.Results: Four clinically distinct fatigue trajectories were identified: intense fatigue (6.51%), moderate fatigue (48.52%), no fatigue (33%), and increasing fatigue (11.83%). Fatigue severity was directly associated with overall survival. High depression levels were associated with fatigue severity over time for intense (OR = 1.80 [1.32-2.47]) and for moderate (OR = 1.58 [1.25-2.00]) fatigue, compared to patients reporting no fatigue. Patients who did not report fatigue were better adjusted, and had more resources, such as better internal control over the disease and less emotion-focused coping (guilt and avoidance), than those who reported intense (ORcontrol = 0.77 [0.65-0.92]) or moderate (ORcontrol = 0.89 [0.79-0.99] and ORcoping = 1.13 [1.02-1.24]) fatigue.Conclusion: Fatigue trajectories differed considerably across patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. This first longitudinal study on colorectal cancer patients involving transactional variables suggests that psychosocial interventions should target these specific outcomes, in order to help patients manage their fatigue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]