251. Influence of the watch and wait strategy on clinical outcomes of patients with follicular lymphoma in the rituximab era.
- Author
-
Yuda S, Maruyama D, Maeshima AM, Makita S, Kitahara H, Miyamoto KI, Fukuhara S, Munakata W, Suzuki T, Kobayashi Y, Tajima K, Taniguchi H, and Tobinai K
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration & dosage, Cohort Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Young Adult, Antineoplastic Agents administration & dosage, Lymphoma, Follicular diagnosis, Lymphoma, Follicular drug therapy, Rituximab administration & dosage, Time-to-Treatment trends, Watchful Waiting trends
- Abstract
We analyzed the effects of the initial approach to patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) on outcomes in order to investigate whether the watch and wait (WW) strategy is still an acceptable approach in the rituximab era. We retrospectively analyzed 348 patients who were initially diagnosed with FL between 2000 and 2012. We compared the clinical outcomes of the WW cohort and immediate treatment cohort. Among 348 patients (median age of 57 years, range: 19-85), 101 were initially managed with WW and 247 were immediately treated. The median follow-up duration was 75 months (range: 7-169). The estimated median time to treatment failure (TTF) in the treatment following WW cohort and immediate treatment cohort were 92 months (95 % CI, 60.1-NA) and 77 months (95 % CI, 65.1-107.6), respectively, which were not significantly different (P = 0.272) . In a multivariate analysis, clinical stage was identified as a predictive factor of TTF (HR 1.19, 95 % CI, 1.03-1.38, P < 0.05). Neither overall survival rate nor cumulative risk of transformation between the WW cohort and immediate treatment cohort was significant. The results of the present study suggested that the WW strategy is still an acceptable approach for selected FL patients in the rituximab era., Competing Interests: Compliance with ethical standards Ethical approval All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standard of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this study, formal consent is not required. Fundings This work was supported in part by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (26-A-4) and a grant for cancer research (Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control) from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED). Conflict of interest Kensei Tobinai received research funding from Zenyaku Kogyo and Chugai Pharmaceutical.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF