Search

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze, in the same group of patients, the relationship between multiple variables of coronary lesion and results of exercise, dobutamine and dipyridamole stress echocardiography tests., Background: Integrated evaluation of the relation between stress echocardiography results and angiographic variables should include not only the assessment of stenosis severity but also evaluation of other quantitative and qualitative features of coronary stenosis., Methods: Study population consisted of 168 (138 male, 30 female, mean age 51+/-9 years) patients, on whom exercise (Bruce treadmill protocol), dobutamine (up to 40 mcg/kg/min) and dipyridamole (0.84 mg/kg over 10 min) stress echocardiography tests were performed. Stress echocardiography test was considered positive for myocardial ischemia when a new wall motion abnormality was observed. One-vessel coronary stenosis ranging from mild stenosis to complete obstruction of the vessel was present in 153 patients, and 15 patients had normal coronary arteries. The observed angiographic variables included particular coronary vessel, stenosis location, the presence of collaterals, plaque morphology according to Ambrose classification, percent diameter stenosis and obstruction diameter as assessed by quantitative coronary arteriography., Results: Covariates significantly associated with the results of physical and pharmacological stress tests included for all three stress modalities presence of collateral circulation, percent diameter stenosis and obstruction diameter, as well as lesion morphology (p < 0.05 for all, except collaterals for dobutamine stress test, p = 0.06). By stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis, the strongest predictor of the outcome of exercise echocardiography test was only percent diameter stenosis (p = 0.0002). However, both dobutamine and particularly dipyridamole stress echocardiography results were associated not only with stenosis severity - percent diameter stenosis (dobutamine, p = 0.04; dipyridamole, p = 0.003) - but also, and even more strongly, with lesion morphology (dobutamine, p = 0.006; dipyridamole, p = 0.0009). As all of stress echocardiography results were significantly associated with percent diameter stenosis, the best angiographic cutoff in relation to the results of stress echocardiography test was: exercise, 54%; dobutamine, 58% and dipyridamole, 60% (p < 0.05 vs. exercise)., Conclusions: Integrated evaluation of angiographic variables have shown that the results of dobutamine and dipyridamole stress echocardiography are not only influenced by stenosis severity but also, and even more importantly, by plaque morphology. The results of exercise stress echocardiography, although separately influenced by plaque morphology, are predominantly influenced by stenosis severity, due to a stronger exercise capacity in provoking myocardial ischemia in milder forms of coronary stenosis.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the tolerability and incremental diagnostic value of high adenosine doses in stress echocardiography testing in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD)., Background: In comparison with other pharmacologic stress echocardiography tests, standard dose adenosine stress has sub-optimal sensitivity for detecting milder forms of CAD., Methods: Adenosine stress echocardiography was performed in 58 patients using a starting dose of 100 micrograms/kg body weight per min over 3 min followed by 140 micrograms/kg per min over 4 min (standard dose). If no new wall motion abnormality appeared, the dose was increased to 200 micrograms/kg per min over 4 min (high dose). All patients underwent coronary angiography. Significant CAD was defined as > or = 50% diameter stenosis in at least one major coronary artery. Thirty-three patients had one-vessel and seven had multivessel CAD. Coronary angiographic findings were normal in 18 patients., Results: The high adenosine dose caused a slight but significant increase over baseline values in rate-pressure product. Limiting side effects occurred in two patients during the standard dose protocol and in one patient receiving the high dose regimen. The test was stopped in 30 patients after the standard adenosine dose regimen because of a provoked new wall motion abnormality. The sensitivity of adenosine echocardiography with the standard dose was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI] 63% to 87%). After completion of the standard dose protocol, 28 patients continued testing with the high dose adenosine protocol. The overall sensitivity of adenosine echocardiography, calculated as cumulative, increased to 92% (95% CI 84% to 100%) with the high dose (p < 0.05). The specificity of adenosine testing was 100% and 88%, respectively, with the standard and high dose regimen (p = 0.617)., Conclusions: We believe that use of a higher than usual adenosine dose protocol for stress testing may improve the diagnostic value of adenosine echocardiography, mainly by increasing sensitivity in patients with single-vessel disease without deterioration of the safety profile and with only a mild reduction in specificity.

Objectives: This study was designed to assess the clinical, hemodynamic and diagnostic effects of the addition of dobutamine to dipyridamole echocardiography., Background: Pharmacologic stress echocardiography with either dipyridamole or dobutamine has gained acceptance because of its safety, feasibility, diagnostic accuracy and prognostic power. The main limitation of the two tests is a less than ideal sensitivity in some patient subsets, such as those with limited coronary artery disease. We hypothesized that two pharmacologic stresses might act synergistically in the induction of ischemia by combining the mechanisms of inappropriate coronary vasodilation (with dipyridamole) and an increase in myocardial oxygen consumption (with dobutamine)., Methods: One hundred fifty patients (mean [+/- SD] age 51 +/- 11 years) referred for stress echocardiography were initially studied by dipyridamole-dobutamine echocardiography. The test was stopped during the dipyridamole step in 95 patients for achievement of a predetermined end point (obvious dyssynergy induced by lower or higher dipyridamole dose), and dipyridamole-dobutamine tests were performed in 55 patients (negative dipyridamole echocardiographic test). In the same 150 patients the dobutamine echocardiographic test (up to 40 micrograms/kg body weight per min) was performed on a separate day., Results: Significant coronary artery disease (> 50% diameter stenosis of at least one major coronary vessel by quantitative coronary arteriography) was present in 131 patients (one vessel in 115; two vessels in 10, three vessels in 6), with normal coronary arteriography in 19. The feasibility of the dipyridamole-dobutamine test was 96%. Self-limiting side effects occurred in 5% of patients. The peak rate-pressure product was lowest during the dipyridamole test (132 +/- 30) and was comparable during the dobutamine (186 +/- 59) and dipyridamole-dobutamine tests (179 +/- 45, p = NS vs. dobutamine; p < 0.01 vs. dipyridamole). Sensitivity was 71% for dipyridamole, 75% for dobutamine and 92% for dipyridamole-dobutamine echocardiography (dipyridamole vs. dipyridamole-dobutamine, p < 0.01; dobutamine vs. dipyridamole-dobutamine, p < 0.01; dipyridamole vs. dobutamine, p = NS), whereas specificity was 89% for dipyridamole, 79% for dobutamine and 89% for dipyridamole-dobutamine echocardiography (p = NS for all)., Conclusions: Routine dobutamine addition to dipyridamole stress testing is clinically useful and well tolerated. It expands the spectrum of the disease detectable by pharmacologic stress echocardiography and allows documentation of milder forms of coronary artery disease that can be missed by conventional dipyridamole or dobutamine stress echocardiography.