251. Comparison of cladribine- and fludarabine-based induction chemotherapy in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia.
- Author
-
Park, Hyunkyung, Youk, Jeonghwan, Kim, Inho, Yoon, Sung-Soo, Park, Seonyang, Lee, Jeong-Ok, Bang, Soo-Mee, and Koh, Youngil
- Subjects
- *
FLUDARABINE , *ANTINEOPLASTIC agents , *CANCER chemotherapy , *LEUKEMIA treatment , *MYELOID leukemia , *ACUTE leukemia , *STEM cell transplantation , *THERAPEUTICS , *ACUTE myeloid leukemia treatment , *ADENOSINES , *ANTIMETABOLITES , *ANTIVIRAL agents , *COMBINED modality therapy , *COMPARATIVE studies , *DRUG resistance in cancer cells , *CLINICAL drug trials , *GRANULOCYTE-colony stimulating factor , *HEMATOPOIETIC stem cell transplantation , *HOMOGRAFTS , *RESEARCH methodology , *MEDICAL cooperation , *PROGNOSIS , *RESEARCH , *DISEASE relapse , *EVALUATION research , *ACUTE myeloid leukemia , *TREATMENT effectiveness , *PROPORTIONAL hazards models , *RETROSPECTIVE studies , *CYTARABINE , *SALVAGE therapy , *KAPLAN-Meier estimator - Abstract
Induction regimens integrating cladribine or fludarabine have shown promising outcomes in relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). We compared the outcome of a cladribine- versus a fludarabine-based regimen as induction chemotherapy for R/R-AML. We included patients with R/R-AML who were treated with a cladribine- or fludarabine-based chemotherapy between 2006 and 2015. We analysed 120 patients, 65 treated with cladribine and 55 treated with fludarabine. The CR rates were 62.7 and 61.4 % for the cladribine group and fludarabine group, respectively (p = 0.890). Poor prognostic factors included older age, secondary AML, poor cytogenetic risk group, prior induction failure, and short first CR duration. No significant overall survival (OS) or relapse-free survival (RFS) differences were found between the groups (OS, p = 0.213; RFS, p = 0.143). However, in a certain subset, survival outcomes were better with cladribine than with fludarabine, including de novo AML, CR at first induction therapy, and not-poor cytogenetic risk group inclusion without overt chemotherapy-refractoriness. By contrast, secondary AML patients had improved survival outcomes when treated with the fludarabine regimen. After CR, better outcomes were observed when allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) was given as consolidation. In R/R-AML, cladribine- and fludarabine-based combination induction chemotherapy had differential survival outcomes according to disease characteristics. Allogeneic SCT after CR with a purine analogue-based regimen improved long-term outcome in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF