Search

Background: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a minimally invasive and proven percutaneous procedure that is widely used to treat patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. The purpose of this study was to characterize the in-hospital outcomes of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients undergoing CAS at a single neurovascular center., Methods: The study was conducted as a retrospective analysis of 1158 patients (asymptomatic, n = 636; symptomatic, n = 522; male, n = 816; median age, 71 years; NASCET method, 70-99% stenosis, n = 830) who underwent CAS between May 2009 and December 2020. In-hospital neurological outcomes, adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media, acute myocardial infarction, intraprocedural complications, and access-site issues were evaluated. The primary endpoints were disabling stroke (including disabling cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome [CHS]) and all in-hospital deaths., Results: A carotid stent could not be deployed in one patient due to calcified plaques (technical failure rate of 0.09%). Four patients (0.3%) experienced in-hospital, stroke-associated death, while five patients (0.4%) died from non-stroke-related causes. All stroke-associated deaths occurred in the symptomatic group and were due to CHS. The disabling stroke rate was 0.9% overall ( n = 10; 0.5% versus 1.3% in asymptomatic versus symptomatic patients, respectively). Nineteen patients (1.6%) reached the in-hospital primary endpoint. More patients in the symptomatic group achieved this endpoint than in the asymptomatic group (2.5% versus 0.9%, respectively; p = 0.060)., Conclusions: An evaluation was conducted on the in-hospital outcomes of 1158 patients at a single center who underwent CAS and was performed by trained physicians who were supervised by a senior neurovascular interventionist with over 20 years of experience, confirming the excellent safety profile of this procedure with a low rate of complications.

Background: Although studies have continued to demonstrate the advantages of transradial access (TRA) for neurointervention, radial artery spasm (RAS) has remained a frequent cause of TRA failure. Dotter and Judkins initially described a technique to dilate areas of peripheral vascular stenosis by advancing sequentially larger catheters across the lesion over a guidewire. We have presented our institutional experience with the use of a modified Dotter technique with long radial sheaths to dilate areas of proximal flow-limiting RAS. In the present study, we reviewed the use of the Dotter technique for alleviating RAS in patients undergoing TRA for neurointervention., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing TRA for neurointervention at our institution from 2018 to 2020 to identify patients with proximal flow-limiting RAS. For the identified patients, a modified Dotter technique had been used to dilate the stenosis. The demographic and periprocedural data were assessed to identify any adverse outcomes., Results: Four patients with severe proximal flow-limiting RAS were identified. In each case, a hydrophilic long radial sheath and vascular dilator were sequentially advanced through the stenosis. In all cases, repeat angiography demonstrated improvement of the spasm, and the final radial angiograms demonstrated persistent improvement in caliber and regularity of the vessel. Each procedure was also completed via TRA with no periprocedural complications., Conclusions: Our modified Dotter technique was effective in bypassing areas of severe proximal flow-limiting RAS, obviating the need for access site conversion. Additional studies are warranted to understand the implication of the angioplasty-like effects seen within the radial artery after removal of the long radial sheaths., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Because femoral pseudoaneurysm (FPA) is a dangerous complication of interventional procedures with a risk of life-threatening bleeding, our aim was to develop a predictive nomogram for FPA after neurointervention, and to suggest the best method for early identification of FPA., Methods: We searched the PubMed database for literature addressing FPA after interventional procedures to analyze the risk factors, and we also reviewed the clinical data of patients from the Department of Neurosurgery who underwent neurointerventional procedures. Selected parameters were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. A nomogram was constructed using the independent risk factors by a multivariate regression model, and was validated by bootstrap resampling method, as well as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, decision curve analysis (DCA) and calibration curve. The influence on the detection rate of FPA with Doppler ultrasound was also analyzed with Fisher's exact test., Results: According to existing studies, female sex, diabetes and hypertension are major risk factors of FPA. Among 1,098 clinical patients, hypertension (P=0.044), higher body mass index (BMI) (P=0.020), larger sheath size (P=0.049), puncture site hematoma (P=0.011) and closure failure (P=0.003) were identified as independent risk factors. The nomogram including these factors showed robust discrimination [C-index, 0.916; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.810-1.022] with an area under the curve of 0.916. DCA indicated clinical utility, and the calibration curves showed an acceptable consistency. A significant improvement in the detection rate occurred when Doppler ultrasound was utilized (P=0.031)., Conclusions: The presented nomogram showed favorable predictive accuracy for FPA after neurointervention. We recommend ultrasound examination for patients at high risk of FPA evaluated by the nomogram., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-21-6508/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.)

Neurodiagnostic and neurointerventional radiology (NIR) play a central role in the diagnosis and treatment of skull base disorders. Noninvasive imaging modalities, including computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, are important in lesion localization, evaluation of lesion extent, and diagnosis, but cannot always be definitive. Image-guided skull base biopsy and percutaneous and endovascular treatment options are important tools in the diagnosis and treatment of head, neck, and skull base disorders. NIR plays an important role in the treatment of vascular disorders of the skull base. This article summarizes the imaging evaluation and interventional therapies pertinent to the skull base., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

At the time of this writing, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic continues to be a global threat, disrupting usual processes, and protocols for delivering health care around the globe. There have been significant regional and national differences in the scope and timing of these disruptions. Many hospitals were forced to temporarily halt elective neurointerventional procedures with the first wave of the pandemic in the spring of 2020, in order to prioritize allocation of resources for acutely ill patients and also to minimize coronavirus disease 2019 transmission risks to non-acute patients, their families, and health care workers. This temporary moratorium on elective neurointerventional procedures is generally credited with helping to "flatten the curve" and direct scarce resources to more acutely ill patients; however, there have been reports of some delaying seeking medical care when it was in fact urgent, and other reports of patients having elective treatment delayed with the result of morbidity and mortality. Many regions have resumed elective neurointerventional procedures, only to now watch coronavirus disease 2019 positivity rates again climbing as winter of 2020 approaches. A new wave is now forecast which may have larger volumes of hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 patients than the earlier wave(s) and may also coincide with a wave of patients hospitalized with seasonal influenza. This paper discusses relevant and practical elements of cessation and safe resumption of nonemergent neurointerventional services in the setting of a pandemic.

Objectives: Our primary objective was to determine the successful rate of recanalization of M1 large vessel occlusion using either the Trevo 4 × 30 mm or 6 × 25 mm stent during mechanical thrombectomy. Our secondary objectives were to determine differences between the use of these two stent retrievers regarding first-pass effect, periprocedural complications, and mortality in the first 90 days. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Data regarding the stent used, recanalization, number of passes, periprocedural complications, and mortality were determined via our mechanical thrombectomy database along with chart review. Conclusion: When comparing Trevo 4 × 30 mm to 6 × 25 mm stent retrievers used in mechanical thrombectomy for middle cerebral artery large-vessel occlusion causing stroke, there is no statistically significant difference in successful recanalization rates, first-pass effect, perioperative complications, or mortality at 90 days. Studies like this will hopefully lead to further prospective, randomized controlled trials that will help show experts in the field an additional way to perform this procedure effectively and safely., Competing Interests: JS is a consultant for Stryker and Medtronic. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Oliver, Brereton, Khan, Davis and Singer.)

Objective: Geographic factors prevent equitable access to urgent advanced neuroendovascular treatments. Robotic technologies may enable remote endovascular procedures in the future. The authors performed a translational, benchtop-to-clinical study to evaluate the in vitro and clinical feasibility of the CorPath GRX Robotic System for robot-assisted endovascular neurointerventional procedures., Methods: A series of bench studies was conducted using patient-specific 3D-printed models to test the system's compatibility with standard neurointerventional devices, including microcatheters, microwires, coils, intrasaccular devices, and stents. Optimal baseline setups for various procedures were determined. The models were further used to rehearse clinical cases. Subsequent to these investigations, a prospective series of 6 patients was treated using robotic assistance for complex, wide-necked intracranial saccular aneurysms between November 2019 and February 2020. The technical success, incidence of periprocedural complications, and need for conversion to manual procedures were evaluated., Results: The ideal robotic setup for treatment of both anterior and posterior circulation aneurysms was determined to consist of an 80-cm guide catheter with a 115-cm-long intermediate catheter, a microcatheter between 150 and 170 cm in length, and a microwire with a minimum length of 300 cm. All coils, intrasaccular devices, and stents tested were compatible with the system and could be advanced or retracted safely and placed accurately. All 6 clinical procedures were technically successful, with all intracranial steps being performed robotically with no conversions to manual intervention or failures of the robotic system. There were no procedure-related complications or adverse clinical outcomes., Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of robot-assisted neurointerventional procedures. The authors' results represent an important step toward enabling remote neuroendovascular care and geographic equalization of advanced endovascular treatments through so-called telestroke intervention.

Background: Endovascular treatment (EVT) for stroke due to medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) can be technically challenging. Devices and tools are rapidly evolving. We aimed to gain insight into preferences and global perspectives on the usage of endovascular tools in treating MeVOs. Methods: We conducted an international survey with seven scenarios of patients presenting A3, M2/3, M3, M3/4, or P2/3 occlusions. Respondents were asked for their preferred first-line endovascular approach, and whether they felt that the appropriate endovascular tools were available to them. Answers were analyzed by occlusion location and geographical region of practice, using multinomial/binary logistic regression. Results: A total of 263 neurointerventionists provided 1836 responses. The first-line preferences of physicians were evenly distributed among stent-retrievers, combined approaches, and aspiration only (33.2, 29.8, and 26.8%, respectively). A3 occlusions were more often treated with stent-retrievers (RR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.07-1.36), while intra-arterial thrombolysis was more often preferred in M3 (RR 2.47, 95% CI: 1.53-3.98) and M3/4 occlusions (RR 7.71, 95% CI: 4.16-14.28) compared to M2/3 occlusions. Respondents who thought appropriate tools are currently not available more often chose stent retrievers alone (RR 2.07; 95% CI: 1.01-4.24) or intra-arterial thrombolysis (RR 3.35, 95% CI: 1.26-8.42). Physicians who stated that they do not have access to optimal tools opted more often not to treat at all (RR 3.41, 95% CI: 1.11-10.49). Stent-retrievers alone were chosen more often and contact aspiration alone less often as a first-line approach in Europe (RR 2.12, 95% CI: 1.38-3.24; and RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.34-0.70, respectively) compared to the United States and Canada. Conclusions: In EVT for MeVO strokes, neurointerventionalists choose a targeted vessel specific first-line approach depending on the occlusion location, region of practice, and availability of the appropriate tools., Competing Interests: NK is an informatics consultant for Circle Neurovascular. JF reports grants and personal fees from Stryker, Acandis, Microvention, Medtronic, personal fees from Codman, Ceronovus, Penumbra, Phenox, other (stock ownership) from Tegus, outside the submitted work; and Executive functions with University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Eppdata GmbH. MC reports personal fees from Stryker, personal fees from Microvention, Medtronic, Genentech, Ceronovus, Penumbra, outside the submitted work. MG reports personal fees from Stryker, personal fees from Mentice, personal fees from Microvention, personal fees from Medtronic, outside the submitted work; in addition, MG has a patent for Systems of acute stroke diagnosis issued and licensed. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Kashani, Cimflova, Ospel, Singh, Almekhlafi, Rempel, Fiehler, Chen, Sakai, Agid, Heran, Kappelhof and Goyal.)

The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of neurointervention combined with intravenous thrombolysis in the treatment of ischemic cerebrovascular disease (ICD) and its influence on the neurological function and prognosis of patients. A total of 119 patients with ICD admitted to Xinxiang Central Hospital (Xinxiang, China) from May 2013 to September 2015 were selected. Among them, 65 patients were enrolled in the control group and treated with intravenous thrombolysis, whereas the other 54 patients were enrolled in the observation group and were treated with intravenous thrombolysis combined with neurointervention. The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) system was used to evaluate the neurological function of patients after treatment. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis was carried out to assess the survival of patients. The total effective rate, complications, vascular recanalization and the hospitalization time after treatment were compared between the two groups. The NIHSS scores at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment were statistically lower in the observation group than those in the control group (P<0.05). The total effective rate and total vascular recanalization in the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was statistically lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). In conclusion, neurointervention combined with intravenous thrombolysis can not only effectively improve the diseased blood vessels of patients and restore the damaged nerve function, but also reduce the incidence of complications. Moreover, neurointervention combined with intravenous thrombolysis is safe and can ensure a better quality of life of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Background: Recently there is a trend for radial first which advocates radial artery access as the first choice to perform diagnostic and interventional neurovascular procedures. Although safer than the conventional common femoral artery access, it is associated with a high rate of radial artery occlusion. Distal radial artery access is recently proposed to avoid this complication. This study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of distal radial artery access across a wide range of interventional neurovascular procedures., Materials and Methods: All Interventional neurovascular cases attempted via distal radial artery access from September 2019 till March 2021 were included in the study. Data regarding patient demographics, distal radial artery diameter, access site cannulation, size of the sheath, procedural details including success rate and complications were collected., Results: During the study period, 102 patients underwent 114 procedures via the distal radial artery approach. The mean age of patients was 41.9 ± 15.2 years. Overall procedure success rate via DRA was 94.7% (108/114). 72 diagnostic cerebral angiograms and 36 interventional procedures were successfully completed while six procedures required switching to alternate access., Conclusion: Distal radial artery access is a safe and feasible option for diagnostic cerebral angiography and a wide range of neurovascular procedures., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The transradial approach using a Simmons-shaped catheter has been increasingly used for diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointervention. In the transradial approach for neurointervention, the right radial artery is mainly used. However, in interventional cardiology, there are apparent clinical benefits with the left transradial approach for right-handed patients. To our knowledge, no studies have reported on neurointervention with the routine use of the left transradial approach. We therefore devised a novel technique for cases with an unachievable form of the Simmons shape using the standard technique, which we named the "interchange technique." The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical feasibility of the left transradial neurointervention., Methods: This study is a retrospective review of our prospective database of consecutive patients who underwent a left transradial neurointervention, using a 6-French Simmons guiding sheath, performed from January through April 2021. The outcome variables studied were successful catheterization and procedure-related complications., Results: Twenty-one patients underwent a left transradial neurointervention including cerebral aneurysm coiling, carotid artery stenting, and meningioma embolization. The Simmons shape could not be formed with the standard technique for 3 patients, for whom we successfully formed the Simmons shape with our new interchange technique. The procedure was completely achieved in all 21 patients. No patients required crossover to the right radial or femoral arteries, and there were no radial artery spasms or occlusions or any procedural complications., Conclusions: The left transradial approach for neurointervention is a technically feasible, safe, and effective alternative while providing more comfort to right-handed patients., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Transradial access is an increasingly popular route for cerebral angiography and neurointerventions. However, obstacles to wider adoption remain, especially for complex interventions typically performed with larger, multiaxial systems such as flow diversion. We sought to analyze the published evidence for transradial flow diversion of intracranial aneurysms., Methods: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature review was performed to identify all published reports and studies of transradial flow diversion for intracranial aneurysm. The search was limited from April 2011 to February 2021. Primary outcome was successful completion of the procedure via a transradial approach. Heterogeneity was analyzed with Q and I 2 statistics. Secondary outcomes were transradial access-site complications and other complications., Results: In total, 11 studies involving 290 treated aneurysms were identified; 90.7% of the procedures were completed via the transradial approach. The heterogeneity between studies was high, with an I 2 of 56.9%. There were no transradial access-site complications. The procedural complication rate was 2.41%., Conclusions: Transradial access has a high success rate for both anterior and posterior circulation flow-diversion embolizations. The success rate may be particularly high for posterior circulation and right anterior circulation aneurysms. It has a negligible access-site complication rate. Transradial access is a viable alternative to transfemoral access for flow diversion and should be considered as a first-line approach., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: In this review, we will summarize the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neurointerventional care for patients with cerebrovascular disease, with a particular emphasis on epidemiology, neurointerventional processes, and lessons learned from paradigm shifts in endovascular care. Areas covered: Peer-reviewed research is summarized regarding the complications of COVID-19 as related to the pandemic's impact on hospital admissions, imaging capabilities, treatment times, and outcomes of neurointerventional cases. Expert opinion: In the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a global decline in neuroimaging, use of intravenous thrombolysis, thrombectomy, and coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms. An early recommendation to utilize general anesthesia and intubate all patients undergoing intervention to avoid an emergent aerosolizing procedure was found to have worse outcomes. The decline in new stroke and subarachnoid hemorrhage diagnoses may be related to patient and/or family fear of seeking acute medical care. A true shift in stroke epidemiology is also possible. As several vaccines become more readily available and the world rebounds from this pandemic, we hope to transform the neurointerventional experiences discussed in this paper into strategies that may improve care delivery of neurologically ill patients during a global crisis.

Objective: Polymorphisms in the CYP2C9 gene may be associated with adverse vascular events following endovascular procedures independent of antiplatelet therapy. We aimed to investigate the impact of CYP2C9 loss-of-function polymorphisms on adverse vascular events following neurointervention.Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing neurointervention were prospectively recruited between 2010 and 2016. Patients were genotyped for the CYP2C9*2 and *3 loss-of-function polymorphisms. On the basis of possible genetic influence on antiplatelet response, ex vivo clopidogrel response was measured using the VerifyNow® P2Y12 Assay. The primary endpoint was the 90-day incidence of adverse vascular events including ischemic stroke.Results: A total of 229 patients were included. The median age was 57 years (IQR: 49-64), and 158 (69.00%) were female. Eighty-one (35.37%) patients carried at least one CYP2C9 loss-of-function (LOF) allele. After adjustment for stroke risk factors, the 90-day incidence of ischemic stroke was significantly lower in the LOF group compared to the wild type group (1.23% vs 10.14%; ORadj = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.03-0.91; p = 0.04).Conclusions: Our results suggest protection against ischemic stroke in carriers of CYP2C9*2 or *3 polymorphisms undergoing neurointervention. Our findings warrant further studies to investigate the mechanisms by which CYP2C9 may influence the risk of ischemic stroke. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The COVID-19 pandemic is rapidly transforming the healthcare system, with telemedicine, or virtual health, being one of the key drivers of the change. Smart glasses have recently been introduced to the public and have generated interest with healthcare professionals as demonstrated by their early adoption in clinics and hospitals. Observing procedures is essential for young interventionalist-in-training, but sometimes it is difficult for them to be able to get the volume of exposure to procedures that they need. Here, we report the first experience using smart glasses for Neurointerventional procedures, highlighting potential benefits and limitations during different scenarios including invitro and life cases. This field is novel, innovative, and may have potential to improve both patient care and patient safety in other health care settings., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Transradial access (TRA) for neuroendovascular procedures has several clear benefits compared to transfemoral access. In this study, we report our initial experience with neuroendovascular procedures performed via transradial access using the novel Ballast 088 long sheath., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis and identified 91 consecutive patients who underwent neuroendovascular procedures via TRA using the Ballast 088 long sheath. Data collection was performed on indication for procedure, number of vessels selectively catheterized, fluoroscopy time, procedure duration, radiation exposure, failure of radial access and conversion to transfemoral access, periprocedural complications, and procedural outcomes., Results: Amongst 91 patients, the average age was 65.5 years ± 14.2 with 45 (49.5 %) female patients. 25 (27.5 %) patients underwent aneurysm treatment, 2 (2.2 %) AVM/AVF embolization, 28 (30.8 %) intracranial or extracranial stenting, 31 (34.1 %) stroke treatment, and 5 (5.5 %) underwent diagnostic angiogram. The mean number of target vessels catheterized was 1.07 ± 0.25, the mean procedure duration (minutes) was 96.5 ± 57.2, mean fluoroscopy time (minutes) was 21.9 ± 14.2, mean contrast dose (ml) was 112.7 ± 66.7, and mean radiation exposure (Gycm2) was 54.82 ± 41.37. The success rate of target vessel catheterization was 100 %. There were no complications resulting in long term sequelae. Access complications occurred in 1 (1.1 %) patients. Transfemoral conversion was required in 3 (3.3 %) patients., Conclusions: The Ballast 088 long sheath is safe and effective for TRA in neuroendovascular procedures with a low rate of complications and conversion., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

This ESC Council on Stroke/EAPCI/EBNI position paper summarizes recommendations for training of cardiologists in endovascular treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. Interventional cardiologists adequately trained to perform endovascular stroke interventions could complement stroke teams to provide the 24/7 on call duty and thus to increase timely access of stroke patients to endovascular treatment. The training requirements for interventional cardiologists to perform endovascular therapy are described in details and should be based on two main principles: (i) patient safety cannot be compromised, (ii) proper training of interventional cardiologists should be under supervision of and guaranteed by a qualified neurointerventionist and within the setting of a stroke team. Interdisciplinary cooperation based on common standards and professional consensus is the key to the quality improvement in stroke treatment., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Vertebral artery stump syndrome is a rare disease associated with a posterior circulation stroke after vertebral artery origin occlusion. However, few reports have addressed its management. We herein present a case involving a patient with vertebral artery stump syndrome who underwent successful intravascular intervention. We also present a literature review of previous cases of this rare disease. The present case involved a 91-year-old man with acute onset of vertigo and disturbance of consciousness. Diffusion-weighted imaging showed an acute ischaemic stroke in the bilateral cerebellar hemispheres. Magnetic resonance angiography revealed left vertebral artery origin occlusion. Angiography detected a nearly occluded left vertebral artery site, with distal antegrade collateral flow via the deep cervical artery at the C6 level. We observed intravascular stasis at the proximal end of the left vertebral artery via the collateral flow. We performed percutaneous transluminal angioplasty towards the occluded left vertebral artery site. The flow from the left vertebral artery was significantly improved. This is the first report of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty performed for vertebral artery stump syndrome. Although vertebral artery stump syndrome has a high risk of recurrence and a poor prognosis, endovascular intervention showed a better outcome than pharmacotherapy in our patient. However, such cases are rare and further investigations are needed.

Background: Posterior circulation tandem occlusions are poorly characterized in current literature. Data regarding endovascular approaches and outcomes in this patient subgroup is extremely limited., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database and identified 17 patients with posterior circulation tandem occlusions who underwent mechanical thrombectomy between 2014 and 2019., Results: Of 17 patients with posterior circulation tandem occlusion, the mean age was 55.76 ± 11.8 with 35.3% female. The mean NIHSS score on presentation was 17.2 ± 9.2. Tissue plasminogen activator was administered in 7 (41.2%) patients, stent-retrievers alone were used in 2 (11.8%), aspiration catheters alone were used in 2 (11.8%), a combination was used 12 (70.6%), and a self-expandable stent in 5 (29.4%). The mean number of device passes was 2.24 ± 2.02, recanalization failure occurred in 4 (23.5%) patients, the mean time from stroke onset to puncture was 6.9 ± 2.4 h, and the mean time from puncture to recanalization was 59.3 ± 26.6 min. Postprocedural symptomatic ICH occurred in 1 (5.9 %) patient, periprocedural ICH/SAH occurred in 2 (11.8%), periprocedural distal emboli occurred in 0 (0%), periprocedural vessel dissection occurred in 1 (5.9%), and periprocedural vessel perforation occurred in 1 (5.9%) patient. TICI score>2b was achieved in 13 (76.5%) patients. An improvement in NIHSS>3 at discharge occurred in 10 (58.8%) patients, and good outcomes (mRS score < 2) occurred in 7 (41.2%). The mean length of stay was 11.6 ± 12.2 days, and the mortality rate was 41.2%., Conclusion: Endovascular intervention with mechanical thrombectomy is safe and feasible in patients with posterior circulation tandem occlusions., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Distal transradial catheterization in the anatomic snuffbox is an alternate route of access that has started to gain consideration for neuroendovascular procedures., Objective: To assess the feasibility and outcomes and present our institution's experience in performing neuroendovascular procedures via distal transradial access (dTRA)., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis and identified 120 patients who underwent consecutive neuroendovascular procedures via dTRA in the anatomic snuffbox. Data collection was performed on indication for procedure, sheath size, number of vessels selectively catheterized, fluoroscopy time, procedure duration, radiation exposure, conversion to femoral approach, access site complication, and procedure success., Results: Of 120 patients with an average age of 54.7 yr ± 14.7, 73 (60.8%) underwent diagnostic angiograms, 38 (31.7%) underwent follow-up angiograms, and 9 (7.5%) underwent therapeutic procedures. The overall mean number of vessels catheterized was 2.5 ± 0.1 per procedure, the mean procedure time was 68.3 min ± 43.4, the mean fluoroscopy time was 10.8 min ± 7.6, the mean contrast dose was 70.6 mL ± 39.1, and the mean radiation exposure was 27 672.2 mGycm2 ± 42 728.4. Successfully completed therapeutic procedures included aneurysm 1 (0.8%), arteriovenous malformation (AVM)/arteriovenous fistula/carotid cavernous fistula 7 (5.8%), and 1 (0.8%) other treatment. Three patients (2.5%) required adjunct transfemoral endovenous access for AVM embolization. Two minor complications (1.67%) were a local wrist hematoma and a radial artery vasospasm without any sequelae., Conclusion: Distal radial artery catheterization in the anatomic snuffbox is a safe and effective access site to perform neuroendovascular procedures. Complications and conversion rate are low making it a safe alternative., (Copyright © 2020 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.)

Background: Preventing errors and complications in neurointervention is crucial, particularly in the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs), where the natural history is generally benign, and the margin of treatment benefit small. We aimed to investigate how neurointerventionalists perceive the importance and frequency of errors and the resulting complications in endovascular UIA treatment, and which steps could be taken to prevent them., Methods: An international multidisciplinary survey was conducted among neurointerventionalists. Participants provided their demographic characteristics and neurointerventional treatment volume. They were asked about their perceptions on the importance and frequency of different errors in endovascular UIA treatment, and which solutions they thought to be most effective in preventing these errors., Results: Two-hundred-thirty-three neurointerventionalists from 38 countries participated in the survey. Participants identified errors in technical execution as the most common source of complications in endovascular UIA treatment (40.4% thought these errors constituted a relatively or very large proportion of all complication sources), closely followed by errors in decision-making/indication (32.2%) and errors related to management of unexpected events (28.4%). Simulation training was thought to be most effective in reducing technical errors, while cognitive errors were believed to be best minimized by abandoning challenging procedures, more honest discussion of complications and better standardization of procedure steps., Conclusion: Neurointerventionalists perceived both technical and cognitive errors to be important sources of complications in endovascular UIA treatment. Simulation training, a cultural change, higher acceptance of bail-out strategies and better standardization of procedures were perceived to be most effective in preventing these.

Background: In cardiac intervention, the transradial approach (TRA) is increasingly used as the first-line approach owing to numerous advantages over the transfemoral approach. Neurointerventional TRA, especially in intracranial interventions, is predominantly restricted to an alternative approach, as transradial carotid cannulation using a conventional transfemoral system can be technically challenging for patients with unfavorable acute takeoff of the target common carotid artery. This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of first-line TRA with a radial-specific neurointerventional guiding sheath for a large series of consecutive intracranial anterior circulation aneurysm embolizations., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed our institutional database of first-line TRA for consecutive coil embolizations of anterior circulation aneurysms conducted between June 2018 and March 2020. A radial-specific 6-F Simmons guiding sheath (0.088-inch inner diameter) was engaged into the target common carotid artery, and subsequently a triaxial or quadraxial system was created for the embolization procedure. We assessed procedural success and procedure-related or vascular access site complications., Results: A total of 119 patients with intracranial anterior circulation aneurysms underwent 121 coil embolization procedures. Of these, 101 patients who underwent 103 (85.1%) embolization procedures treated with first-line TRA were included. After the triaxial or quadraxial system was constructed, the embolization procedure was successful for all 103 cases without catheter kinking, system instability, or complications., Conclusions: A transradial 0.088-inch triaxial or quadraxial system provided sufficient stability and kink resistance for intracranial aneurysm embolization. This method is feasible, highly successful, and safe for intracranial anterior circulation aneurysm embolization., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has revolutionized training, education, and device testing. Understanding the design and physical properties of 3D-printed models is important., Objective: To systematically review the design, physical properties, accuracy, and experimental outcomes of 3D-printed vascular models used in neurointervention., Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature between January 1, 2000 and September 30, 2018. Public/Publisher MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Compendex, Cochrane, and Inspec databases were searched using Medical Subject Heading terms for design and physical attributes of 3D-printed models for neurointervention. Information on design and physical properties like compliance, lubricity, flow system, accuracy, and outcome measures were collected., Results: A total of 23 articles were included. Nine studies described 3D-printed models for stroke intervention. Tango Plus (Stratasys) was the most common material used to develop these models. Four studies described a population-representative geometry model. All other studies reported patient-specific vascular geometry. Eight studies reported complete reconstruction of the circle of Willis, anterior, and posterior circulation. Four studies reported a model with extracranial vasculature. One prototype study reported compliance and lubricity. Reported circulation systems included manual flushing, programmable pistons, peristaltic, and pulsatile pumps. Outcomes included thrombolysis in cerebral infarction, post-thrombectomy flow restoration, surgical performance, and qualitative feedback., Conclusion: Variations exist in the material, design, and extent of reconstruction of vasculature of 3D-printed models. There is a need for objective characterization of 3D-printed vascular models. We propose the development of population representative 3D-printed models for skill improvement or device testing., (Copyright © 2020 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.)

Background: The transfemoral approach (TFA) has been the standard in neuroradiology over the years. However, the transradial approach (TRA) and its variants offer several benefits over the TFA., Methods: Review of the literature about TRA and its variations. We present our results for different neurointerventional procedures at our institution between January 2018 and December 2019., Results: We wrote an educational review describing anatomical and technical aspects, advantages, and complications of this approach. In the past year we increased the percentage of neurointerventional procedures performed through radial or ulnar arteries., Conclusion: There are clearly proven benefits of employing a wrist approach in patients for neurointerventional procedures and its utilization should especially be considered on a daily basis., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2020 Surgical Neurology International.)

A long-standing goal of translational neuroscience is the ability to noninvasively deliver therapeutic agents to specific brain regions with high spatiotemporal resolution. Focused ultrasound (FUS) is an emerging technology that can noninvasively deliver energy up the order of 1 kW/cm 2 with millimeter and millisecond resolution to any point in the human brain with Food and Drug Administration-approved hardware. Although FUS is clinically utilized primarily for focal ablation in conditions such as essential tremor, recent breakthroughs have enabled the use of FUS for drug delivery at lower intensities (i.e., tens of watts per square centimeter) without ablation of the tissue. In this review, we present strategies for image-guided FUS-mediated pharmacologic neurointerventions. First, we discuss blood-brain barrier opening to deliver therapeutic agents of a variety of sizes to the central nervous system. We then describe the use of ultrasound-sensitive nanoparticles to noninvasively deliver small molecules to millimeter-sized structures including superficial cortical regions and deep gray matter regions within the brain without the need for blood-brain barrier opening. We also consider the safety and potential complications of these techniques, with attention to temporal acuity. Finally, we close with a discussion of different methods for mapping the ultrasound field within the brain and describe future avenues of research in ultrasound-targeted drug therapies., (Copyright © 2020 Wang, Di Ianni, Vyas, Huang, Park, Hosseini-Nassab, Aryal and Airan.)