251. Immunohistochemical study of corneal inflammation after femtosecond laser clear corneal incisions or manual surgery.
- Author
-
Toto L, Curcio C, Mastropasqua A, Mattei PA, D'Ugo E, De Nicola C, and Mastropasqua L
- Subjects
- Apoptosis, Cornea surgery, Humans, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, Keratitis, Laser Therapy, Cornea immunology, Corneal Surgery, Laser, Inflammation
- Abstract
Purpose: To use immunohistochemical staining to evaluate corneal inflammation and apoptosis induced after femtosecond laser incisions or manual incisions., Setting: Ophthalmology Clinic, University G. d'Annunzio, Chieti, Italy., Design: Experimental study., Methods: Ninety human cadaver corneas were cut manually or with the femtosecond laser at different energies and analyzed by immunohistochemistry after 5 minutes or 4 hours. The corneas were divided into 5 groups: untreated (Group 1), cut manually (Group 2), and treated with the femtosecond laser with increasing energies (Groups 3 to 5; 3.0 μJ, 6.0 μJ, and 15.0 μJ, respectively)., Results: At 5 minutes, increased expression of interleukin (IL)-18 was observed in the femtosecond laser groups compared with the manual group (P < .01). Interferon gamma (IFNγ) positivity was significantly higher in Groups 4 and 5 than in Group 2 and between Groups 3 and 4 (P < .05). The terminal uridine deoxynucleotidyl nick end-labeling (TUNEL) positivity increased with higher energy (Group 2 versus Group 4 and Group 2 versus Group 5; P < .05). After 4 hours, IFNγ positivity was higher in Group 5 than in Group 2 (P = .0021) and between Group 5 and Groups 3 and 4 (P < .05). No sign of IL-18 positivity was found after 4 hours in any sample. Group 5 showed significant higher TUNEL positivity than all other groups (P < .0001)., Conclusion: The femtosecond laser technique at high energies induced a higher corneal inflammatory response and a higher corneal cell apoptosis than the manual technique., Financial Disclosure: None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned., (Copyright © 2016 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF