Search

Background: Patients with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA), receiving disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs with immunosuppressive effects, may be at increased risk of vaccine-preventable infections. This substudy assessed protective antibody responses to diphtheria and tetanus vaccination given prior to study enrolment in patients with pJIA. Findings: This was a substudy of a 24-month, single-arm, open-label, multicenter, Phase III trial (NCT01844518) of subcutaneous abatacept in children with active pJIA (N = 219). Patients aged 2–5 years, with ≥2 continuous months of weekly weight-tiered (10–< 25 kg [50 mg], 25–< 50 kg [87.5 mg]) subcutaneous abatacept treatment (with/without methotrexate and/or low-dose corticosteroids), who received diphtheria/tetanus vaccine prior to enrolment, were eligible. Protective antibody levels to diphtheria/tetanus (> 0.1 IU/mL), and safety, were assessed. Overall, 29 patients were analyzed: 19 (65.5%), 1 (3.4%) and 9 (31.0%) patients had > 12, 6–12 and 2–< 6 months of abatacept exposure, respectively. All patients had protective antibody levels to tetanus and 26 (89.7%) patients had protective antibody levels to diphtheria. Of the 3 patients without protective antibody levels to diphtheria, each had an antibody level of 0.1 IU/mL, bordering the lower threshold of protection. Concomitant use of methotrexate and/or low-dose corticosteroids had no evident effect on antibody levels. No unexpected adverse events, including cases of diphtheria or tetanus, were reported during the 24-month period. Conclusions: Patients aged 2–5 years with pJIA who received 2–24 months of weekly subcutaneous abatacept, with or without concomitant methotrexate and/or low-dose corticosteroids, maintained effective diphtheria and tetanus vaccination protection without new safety signals. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01844518); registered May 1, 2013; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01844518?term=NCT01844518&rank=1 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Biologics treatment with antitumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) is efficacious in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Despite displaying clinical inactivity during treatment, many patients will flare on cessation of therapy. The inability to definitively discriminate patients who will relapse or continue to remain in remission after therapy withdrawal is currently a major unmet medical need. CD4 T cells have been implicated in active disease, yet how they contribute to disease persistence despite treatment is unknown.Methods: We interrogated the circulatory reservoir of CD4+ immune subsets at the single-cell resolution with mass cytometry (cytometry by time of flight) of patients with JIA (n=20) who displayed continuous clinical inactivity for at least 6 months with anti-TNFα and were subsequently withdrawn from therapy for 8 months, and scored as relapse or remission. These patients were examined prior to therapy withdrawal for putative subsets that could discriminate relapse from remission. We verified on a separate JIA cohort (n=16) the dysregulation of these circulatory subsets 8 months into therapy withdrawal. The immunological transcriptomic signature of CD4 memory in relapse/remission patients was examined with NanoString.Results: An inflammatory memory subset of CD3+CD4+CD45RA-TNFα+ T cells deficient in immune checkpoints (PD1-CD152-) was present in relapse patients prior to therapy withdrawal. Transcriptomic profiling reveals divergence between relapse and remission patients in disease-centric pathways involving (1) T-cell receptor activation, (2) apoptosis, (3) TNFα, (4) nuclear factor-kappa B and (5) mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling.Conclusions: A unique discriminatory immunomic and transcriptomic signature is associated with relapse patients and may explain how relapse occurs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To develop recommendations for the screening, monitoring, and treatment of uveitis in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).Methods: Pediatric rheumatologists, ophthalmologists with expertise in uveitis, patient representatives, and methodologists generated key clinical questions to be addressed by this guideline. This was followed by a systematic literature review and rating of the available evidence according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. A group consensus process was used to compose the final recommendations and grade their strength as conditional or strong.Results: Due to a lack of literature with good quality of evidence, recommendations were formulated on the basis of available evidence and a consensus expert opinion. Regular ophthalmic screening of children with JIA is recommended because of the risk of uveitis, and the frequency of screening should be based on individual risk factors. Regular ophthalmic monitoring of children with uveitis is recommended, and intervals should be based on ocular examination findings and treatment regimen. Ophthalmic monitoring recommendations were strong primarily because of concerns of vision-threatening complications of uveitis with infrequent monitoring. Topical glucocorticoids should be used as initial treatment to achieve control of inflammation. Methotrexate and the monoclonal antibody tumor necrosis factor inhibitors adalimumab and infliximab are recommended when systemic treatment is needed for the management of uveitis. The timely addition of nonbiologic and biologic drugs is recommended to maintain uveitis control in children who are at continued risk of vision loss.Conclusion: This guideline provides direction for clinicians and patients/parents making decisions on the screening, monitoring, and management of children with JIA and uveitis, using GRADE methodology and informed by a consensus process with input from rheumatology and ophthalmology experts, current literature, and patient/parent preferences and values. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To develop treatment recommendations for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis manifesting as non-systemic polyarthritis, sacroiliitis, or enthesitis.Methods: The Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) questions were developed and refined by members of the guideline development teams. A systematic review was conducted to compile evidence for the benefits and harms associated with treatments for these conditions. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was used to rate the quality of evidence. A group consensus process was conducted among the Voting Panel to generate the final recommendations and grade their strength. A Parent and Patient Panel used a similar consensus approach to provide patient/caregiver preferences for key questions.Results: Thirty-nine recommendations were developed (8 strong and 31 conditional). The quality of supporting evidence was very low or low for 90% of the recommendations. Recommendations are provided for the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, biologics, and intraarticular and oral glucocorticoids. Recommendations for the use of physical and occupational therapy are also provided. Specific recommendations for polyarthritis address general medication use, initial and subsequent treatment, and adjunctive therapies. Good disease control, with therapeutic escalation to achieve low disease activity, was recommended. The sacroiliitis and enthesitis recommendations primarily address initial therapy and adjunctive therapies.Conclusion: This guideline provides direction for clinicians, caregivers, and patients making treatment decisions. Clinicians, caregivers, and patients should use a shared decision-making process that accounts for patients' values, preferences, and comorbidities. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) is rare in many regions of the world, including Europe. Access to approved medications for cSLE is currently limited, among others, due to a lack of high-quality evidence from clinical trials. The objectives of the study were to evaluate the current regulatory framework regarding medication approvals, delineate barriers to clinical trial conduct, and strategies to improve access to new medications for cSLE. Relevant methodological and regulatory aspects, epidemiological data, study designs and outcome measures are reviewed, and the results of a survey among Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation/Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group investigators are presented. Laws and regulations in the USA and Europe necessitate that novel medicines are studied in paediatric populations, if similar or the same diseases in adults have been found to benefit from them. Regulatory agencies consider cSLE the paediatric form of SLE in adults. For medicines that have been found safe and effective in adult SLE, paediatric extrapolation strategies can limit the number and complexity of studies needed to support the labelling of these medicines for use in cSLE. In this setting, specialised research networks, validated outcome measures, stakeholder input, study designs as well as statistical methods successfully used in other uncommon diseases will help improve study efficiency in an effort to enhance the speed with which new drugs for cSLE can be studied. Open-label pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies are preferred by paediatric rheumatologists over double-blind parallel designs for cSLE trials. Appropriate infrastructure, outcome measures and sufficient numbers of patients are available for the testing of new medicines for children with cSLE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Arthropathy of Down syndrome (DA) is largely under-recognized, with an average 2-year delay in diagnosis. Most patients present with polyarthritis, and treatment has historically been challenging.Objectives: Our objective was to investigate the clinical features and treatment of DA in the largest cohort reported to date.Methods: In a retrospective chart review at two tertiary care hospitals, International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, clinical modification (ICD-9-CM) codes for Down syndrome (DS) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 2015, were identified and charts reviewed.Results: In total, 43 patients were identified, with an average (± standard deviation [SD]) follow-up period of 6 ± 4.4 years. The average age of symptom onset was 7.4 ± 3.9 years, with a mean delay of 19 ± 17 months from symptom onset to diagnosis. At diagnosis, 77% of patients had morning stiffness and 72% had abnormal laboratory values; there was an average of 15 ± 13 active joints (range 1-56). Treatment approaches varied, and there was a significant decrease in joints with active arthritis (p < 0.001), with 25% and 39% having at least one change in disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) and biologic therapy, respectively. DMARD therapy was discontinued in 60% because of side effects, and 39% had inadequate response to first-line biologic therapy.Conclusions: DA remains under-recognized, with delays in diagnosis and extensive musculoskeletal symptoms at presentation. While DA can improve with current therapy for JIA (corticosteroids, DMARDs, biologics), barriers include medication toxicity, intolerance, and ineffectiveness. Earlier diagnosis through improved screening and more targeted treatment may allow for earlier disease control and better outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) comprises 7 heterogeneous categories of chronic childhood arthritides. Approximately 5% of children with JIA have rheumatoid factor (RF)–positive arthritis, which phenotypically resembles adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our objective was to compare and contrast the genetics of RF‐positive polyarticular JIA with those of RA and selected other JIA categories, to more fully understand the pathophysiologic relationships of inflammatory arthropathies. Methods: Patients with RF‐positive polyarticular JIA (n = 340) and controls (n = 14,412) were genotyped using the Immunochip array. Single‐nucleotide polymorphisms were tested for association using a logistic regression model adjusting for admixture proportions. We calculated weighted genetic risk scores (wGRS) of reported RA and JIA risk loci, and we compared the ability of these wGRS to predict RF‐positive polyarticular JIA. Results: As expected, the HLA region was strongly associated with RF‐positive polyarticular JIA (P = 5.51 × 10−31). Nineteen of 44 RA risk loci and 6 of 27 oligoarticular/RF‐negative polyarticular JIA risk loci were associated with RF‐positive polyarticular JIA (P < 0.05). The RA wGRS predicted RF‐positive polyarticular JIA (area under the curve [AUC] 0.71) better than did the oligoarticular/RF‐negative polyarticular JIA wGRS (AUC 0.59). The genetic profile of patients with RF‐positive polyarticular JIA was more similar to that of RA patients with age at onset 16–29 years than to that of RA patients with age at onset ≥70 years. Conclusion: RF‐positive polyarticular JIA is genetically more similar to adult RA than to the most common JIA categories and thus appears to be a childhood‐onset presentation of autoantibody‐positive RA. These findings suggest common disease mechanisms, which could lead to novel therapeutic targets and shared treatment strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Juvenile Arthritis Multidimensional Assessment Report (JAMAR) is a new parent/patient-reported outcome measure that enables a thorough assessment of the disease status in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). We report the results of the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the parent and patient versions of the JAMAR in the American English language. The reading comprehension of the questionnaire was tested in 10 JIA parents and patients. Each participating centre was asked to collect demographic, clinical data and the JAMAR in 100 consecutive JIA patients or all consecutive patients seen in a 6-month period and to administer the JAMAR to 100 healthy children and their parents. The statistical validation phase explored descriptive statistics and the psychometric issues of the JAMAR: the 3 Likert assumptions, floor/ceiling effects, internal consistency, Cronbach’s alpha, interscale correlations, test-retest reliability, and construct validity (convergent and discriminant validity). A total of 315 JIA patients (5.1% systemic, 31.1% oligoarticular, 34% RF negative polyarthritis, 29.8% other categories) and 98 healthy children, were enrolled in three centres. The JAMAR components discriminated well healthy subjects from JIA patients. All JAMAR components revealed good psychometric performances. In conclusion, the American English version of the JAMAR is a valid tool for the assessment of children with JIA and is suitable for use both in routine clinical practice and clinical research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To measure agreement among raters when scoring the physician/provider global assessment (PGA) of disease activity in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with no apparent disease activity, and to identify clinical and laboratory parameters that most strongly influence provider scoring of the PGA.Methods: Profiles of clinical and laboratory findings from 20 patients with JIA with no apparent disease activity were given to 51 providers, who were asked to score the PGA using a 21-circle visual analog scale (range 0-10). Following initial scoring, providers discussed each profile and reasons for assigning the score given, and then were asked to rescore each profile. Providers were asked to list variables that influenced their scoring most strongly. Using a mixed-model approach, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the final scores served as the measure of concordance.Results: A total of 504 PGA scores were obtained. The overall ICC of the initial scores was 0.18. Thus, 18% of nonconcordance of the scores was attributable to patient differences, while 82% was due to provider variation. Variables that influenced scoring most strongly were (in order of frequency) presence of pain, questionable temporomandibular joint involvement, loss of joint motion, presence of any morning stiffness, psoriasis, and past history of uveitis.Conclusion: The low ICC suggests poor agreement among providers scoring the PGA in JIA patients with low or no disease activity. Given the ubiquitous use of the PGA in classification and response criteria for JIA and other pediatric rheumatic diseases, substantive efforts are needed to bring about greater uniformity in scoring of global disease activity by providers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common childhood rheumatic disease and has a strong genomic component. To date, JIA genetic association studies have had limited sample sizes, used heterogeneous patient populations, or included only candidate regions. The aim of this study was to identify new associations between JIA patients with oligoarticular disease and those with IgM rheumatoid factor (RF)−negative polyarticular disease, which are clinically similar and the most prevalent JIA disease subtypes. Methods Three cohorts comprising 2,751 patients with oligoarticular or RF-negative polyarticular JIA were genotyped using the Affymetrix Genome-Wide SNP Array 6.0 or the Illumina HumanCoreExome-12+ Array. Overall, 15,886 local and out-of-study controls, typed on these platforms or the Illumina HumanOmni2.5, were used for association analyses. High-quality single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were used for imputation to 1000 Genomes prior to SNP association analysis. Results Meta-analysis showed evidence of association ( P < 1 × 10−6) at 9 regions: PRR9_ LOR ( P = 5.12 × 10−8), ILDR1_ CD86 ( P = 6.73 × 10−8), WDFY4 ( P = 1.79 × 10−7), PTH1R ( P = 1.87 × 10−7), RNF215 ( P = 3.09 × 10−7), AHI1_ LINC00271 ( P = 3.48 × 10−7), JAK1 ( P = 4.18 × 10−7), LINC00951 ( P = 5.80 × 10−7), and HBP1 ( P = 7.29 × 10−7). Of these, PRR9_LOR, ILDR1_CD86, RNF215, LINC00951, and HBP1 were shown, for the first time, to be autoimmune disease susceptibility loci. Furthermore, associated SNPs included cis expression quantitative trait loci for WDFY4, CCDC12, MTP18, SF3A1, AHI1, COG5, HBP1, and GPR22. Conclusion This study provides evidence of both unique JIA risk loci and risk loci overlapping between JIA and other autoimmune diseases. These newly associated SNPs are shown to influence gene expression, and their bounding regions tie into molecular pathways of immunologic relevance. Thus, they likely represent regions that contribute to the pathology of oligoarticular JIA and RF-negative polyarticular JIA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. The mechanisms that determine the efficacy or inefficacy of MTX in JIA are ill-defined. The objective of this study was to identify a gene expression transcriptional signature associated with poor response to MTX in patients with JIA. Methods. RNA sequencing was used to measure gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected from 47 patients with JIA prior to MTX treatment and 14 age-matched controls. Differentially expressed baseline genes between responders and non-responders were evaluated. Biological differences between all JIA patients and controls were explored by constructing a signature of differentially expressed genes. Unsupervised clustering and pathway analysis was performed. Results. A signature of 99 differentially expressed genes (Bonferroni-corrected P<0.05) capturing the biological differences between all JIA patients and controls was identified. Unsupervised clustering of samples based on this list of 99 genes produced subgroups enriched for MTX response status. Comparing this gene signature with reference signatures from sorted cell populations revealed high concordance between the expression signatures of monocytes and of MTX non-responders. CXCL8 (IL-8) was the most significantly differentially expressed gene transcript comparing all JIA patients with controls (Bonferroni-corrected P = 4.12 x 10-10 ). Conclusion. Variability in clinical response to MTX in JIA patients is associated with differences in gene transcripts modulated in monocytes. These gene expression profiles may provide a basis for biomarkers predictive of treatment response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]