Search

We present a modification to prior Achilles tendon repair techniques that utilizes readily available noncommercial instrumentation, mini-open incisions, and supine positioning, thus maximizing surgical efficiencies and reducing complications. In our experience, this is a safe and effective technique that minimizes anesthetic requirements and operating room time. Levels of Evidence: Level V, expert opinion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is limited evidence that syndesmotic implant removal (SIR) is beneficial. However, many surgeons advocate removal based on studies suggesting improved motion. Methodologic difficulties make the validity and applicability of previous works questionable. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of ankle dorsiflexion after SIR using radiographically measured motion before and after screw removal utilizing a standardized load. Methods: All patients undergoing isolated SIR were candidates for inclusion. Dorsiflexion was measured radiographically: (1) immediately before implant removal intraoperatively, (2) immediately after removal intraoperatively, and (3) 3 months after removal. A standardized torque force was applied to the ankle and a perfect lateral radiograph of the ankle was obtained. Four reviewers independently measured dorsiflexion on randomized, deidentified images. A total of 29 patients met inclusion criteria. All syndesmotic injuries were associated with rotational ankle fractures. There were 11 men (38%) and 18 women (62%). The mean, and standard deviation, age was 50.3 ± 16.9 years (range 19-80). Results: The mean ankle dorsiflexion pre-operatively, post-operatively, and at a 3-month follow-up was 13.7 ± 6.6 degrees, 13.3 ± 7.3 degrees and 11.8 ± 11.3 degrees, respectively (P =.466). For subsequent analysis, 5 patients were excluded because of the potential confounding effect of retained suture button devices. Analysis of the remaining 24 patients (and final analysis of 21 patients who had complete 3-month follow-up) demonstrated similar results with no statistically significant difference in ankle dorsiflexion at all 3 time points. Conclusion: Removal of syndesmotic screws may not improve ankle dorsiflexion motion and should not be used as the sole indication for screw removal. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective cohort study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Orthopaedic surgery frequently requires the use of metal plate and screw constructs for osteosynthesis. These constructs may be subsequently removed for a variety of indications. In the lower extremity in particular, implants (ie, hardware) can lead to prominence and pain secondary to a thin soft-tissue envelope with little subcutaneous tissue. Often, removal is performed without knowledge of the exact type of screw head configuration and/or size, which can make removal technically challenging. The purpose of this study is to consolidate screw head sizes and configurations from commonly utilized orthopaedic foot and ankle implant manufacturers matched against 2 commonly used universal implant removal sets to aid in the expeditious removal of hardware.Methods: Orthopaedic manufacturers of foot and ankle-specific implants were included based on market share. Publicly available information on screw size, head configuration, and driver size was collected and recorded. This information was cross-referenced against the drivers available in 2 commonly utilized universal implant removal sets.Results: Seven foot and ankle implant manufacturers were included. The data were compiled in table format according to manufacturer and subcategorized by noncannulated screws, cannulated screws, and locking screws.Conclusion: Many factors affect the success of hardware removal, and it is imperative that the surgeon knows which drivers are compatible with the implanted hardware. The expanding magnitude and diversity of orthopaedic implants makes removal of hardware more challenging. A guide of compatible drivers for various screw types helps expedite this procedure.Levels Of Evidence: Level V. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scoring System (AOFAS-AH) has not been validated and has significant risk for researcher bias, given that 40 out of 100 points are assessed by study staff subjectively. The purpose of this study is to evaluate its recent use in the orthopaedic literature to determine the percentage of previously published studies for which study conclusions would be changed if the AOFAS-AH scores were artificially altered, representing the effect of a systematic researcher bias.Materials and Methods: Articles from January 2012 and February 2015 in three orthopaedic journals were queried for use of the AOFAS-AH. Quantities of 4, 8, or 12 points were added to or subtracted from mean AOFAS-AH scores for each study while otherwise maintaining the reported standard deviation to simulate a researcher bias when scoring the subjective sections. Statistical analysis was performed with the adjusted AOFAS-AH mean scores in order to elucidate a potential "reversal" in statistical significance and conclusion.Results: A 1582 original research articles were published during this time period. 128 articles utilized the AOFAS-AH score. 30 articles (23.4%) reported the required statistical data to permit manipulation of AOFAS-AH scores. Nine of the 30 articles (30%) had a reversal following a manipulation of 12 or fewer points. Seven (5.5%) reported the blinding status of the researchers.Conclusion: The potential for bias is high with the AOFAS-AH and its continued is questionable. Researchers utilizing the AOFAS-AH should at a minimum appropriately blind study staff and consider pre-study clarification of subjective terminology.Levels Of Evidence: Level IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: The Medial Clear Space (MCS) is an anatomic space between the lateral cortex of the medial malleolus and the medial cortex of the talus. Measurement of the MCS is helpful in differentiating which ankle fractures are amenable to non- operative treatment, and which may require fixation. The MCS is often evaluated on radiographic views of the ankle, and several different methods of measuring the MCS have been described in the literature. There is little information on intra-observer reliability of MCS measurement, nor validation of the various medial clear space measurement techniques. As such, the aim of this study was to better understand intra-observer reliability of MCS via several of the most popularly described techniques. Methods: Patients with matched ankle X-rays and CT scans - either weight bearing or non-weight bearing imaging pairs - were identified via electronic medical record database review of a Level-1, academic medical system after IRB approval. Measurement of the MCS on CT scan was used as the gold standard against which radiographic measurements were compared given its superior osseous definition. Four independent reviewers measured the medial clear space on 20 weight bearing, and 20 non-weight bearing x-rays via the five most commonly described methods: 5mm inferior to the talar dome (MCS #1), half way down the medial articular surface of the talus (MCS #2), obliquely at the supero-medial corner of the talus (MCS #3), and at the level of the talar dome (MCS #4). Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were then calculated for each of the four MCS measurements methods after compilation of all independent reviewer data. Results: The ICC varied between each of the four MCS measurement techniques. For measurements 5mm below the talar dome (MCS #1) the ICC was 0.041. Measured halfway down the medial talar articular surface, the ICC was 0.466. The superior oblique MCS measurement ICC was 0.725, and the MCS measured at the level of the talar dome had an ICC of 0.419. MCS measurement 5mm below the talar dome had poor intra-observer reliability, while measurement halfway down the medial articular surface and at the level of the talar dome had fair intra-observer correlation. Overall, measurement of the MCS at the superomedial talar dome had good intra-observer reliability, ranking as the most favorable measurement method. Conclusion: The commonality of ankle fractures demands accurate radiographic interpretation for the determination of need for surgical intervention. The medial clear space measurement is the most common metric used to determine the need for surgery. There is no consensus regarding the optimal method, nor reliability of the various MCS measurement techniques. The results of this study suggest that measurement of the medial clear space at the superomedial corner of the talar dome has the highest intra- observer reliability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Lisfranc injury consists of a spectrum of injuries affecting the tarsometatarsal joint. Various fixation methods are used to treat Lisfranc injuries and each show different outcomes. Metal implants have been used for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of Lisfranc injuries routinely. However, other than the complications in these patients, such as non- anatomical reduction, implant loosening, breakage, and arthrosis, most of these patients will undergo a second surgery for implant removal. Using bio-degradable and bio-integrative materials in these implants reduces the need for these re-operations; however, whether other complications reported for metal implants occur by using bio-integrative materials has yet to be proven. The aim of our study is to assess patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complications in patients received bio-integrative screws for Lisfranc fixation. Methods: The inclusion criteria were 1) ≥ 18 years old, and 2) had ORIF for Lisfranc injury using bio-integrative (OSSIOfiber ™) screws. The patients' charts were reviewed, and the variables were gathered, including the type of injury, pain score, and PROMs. The questionnaires used to evaluate PROMs were Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) surveys for physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, and depression. We also reported the average scores for these PROMs among a randomly sampled population of patients who had ORIF with metal screws for Lisfranc injuries for comparison (n=12). Results: We recruited 12 patients for this study. The minimum follow-up time of the patients in this study was three months. Out of 12 patients, 1 patient showed non-union. The mean (SD) PROMIS scores for physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, and depression were 43.9 (14.9), 56.1 (13.9), 45.9 (10.1), and 43.5 (4.9) in patients who received bio-integrative screws, respectively. In the sampled population treated with metal screws, these PROMs were 42.1 (9.5), 55 (10.1), 46.4 (8.1), and 44.4 (6.4) for physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, and depression, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding physical function (P=0.72), pain interference (P0.82), pain intensity (P=0.88), and depression (P=0.69). Conclusion: The current report showed promising patient-reported outcomes after Lisfranc ORIF with bio-integrative screws. However, longer term follow-ups, as well as comparison with a larger population for both types of instruments, bio-integrative and metal, will shed light on the pros and cons of both materials. Moreover, cost-effective studies are highly suggested to assess the usefulness of these implants against their costs for the healthcare system and the patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Category: Trauma; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: There is a paucity of literature regarding the effect of socioeconomic disparity on patient access to health care following surgery for acute musculoskeletal injuries. We hypothesized that lower socioeconomic status (SES) is independently associated with increased utilization of the emergency department (ED) for care, and less reliable outpatient follow up after ankle fracture surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of 1,571 patients who underwent ankle fracture surgery between 2010 and 2020 at three large academic medical centers and one community hospital. Using 2010 United States Census data linked to place of residence, a summary measure of SES was created for each zip code. SES was divided into three percentile groups: 0-25%, 26-75% and 76-100%, wherein the 0- 25% group represented the lowest SES score. Independent patient and injury factors associated with ED visits and outpatient in-office follow up within 90 days of ankle fracture surgery were examined using multivariable Poisson regression models. Results: Patients in the lowest quintile of SES had a higher incidence of ED visits within 90 days after surgery (adjusted incidence ratio [aIR], 1.54, p< 0.001). Patients in the highest quintile of SES had a higher frequency of outpatient follow up within 90 days after surgery (aIR, 1.23, p< 0.001) compared to those in the middle SES quintile. Independent factors associated with increased ED visits following ankle fracture surgery were lower SES, lateral malleolus fracture, heightened comorbidities, increased BMI, Spanish-speaking patients, and patients with drug and/or alcohol dependence. Conclusion: Patients of lower socioeconomic status, those with substance use disorders, and those who must overcome language barriers to seek care demonstrate higher emergency resource utilization and are less likely to follow up in clinic after ankle fracture surgery. A better understanding of patient and injury factors associated with such increased ED visits may provide guidance as to which patient subpopulations may require more attention after ankle fracture surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Category: Sports; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Acute Achilles tendon ruptures (ATRs) can be treated surgically through either open repair or minimally invasive surgical techniques (MIS). While the relative complication rates between these techniques, including wound dehiscence, re-rupture, and sural nerve injury, have been debated, many studies demonstrate no significant difference between these two approaches. In this study, we conducted a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to compare the incidence and timing of complications between open and MIS repair of acute ATRs and examine factors that may influence these rates. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of patients (≥18 years) who underwent surgical intervention for acute ATR within a four-week period following injury, with a minimum follow-up of three months. Data on demographic variables, type of surgical procedure (MIS or open approach), and the occurrence and timing of postoperative complications were collected. Postoperative complications were classified as venous thromboembolism (VTE), re-rupture, surgical site infecti+D2on (SSI), wound dehiscence, and sural nerve injury.The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to compare the complication rates between the MIS and open repair groups. The log-rank test was used to test the equality of survivor functions. The Cox proportional hazards model was employed to determine predictors of complications. Results: In total, 417 patients were included in the final analysis. The MIS group had a higher proportion of patients with tobacco use. Fifty-two complications in 50 patients were recorded (Table 1). We found no significant difference in the complication rates between the MIS and open repair groups. However, Cox proportional hazards modeling revealed that body mass index (BMI) was a significant predictor of re-ruptures (HR 1.2, 95% CI = 1.05–1.4) and that surgical delay was found to be a significant predictor of wound dehiscence (HR 1.2, 95% CI =1.01–1.3) and sural nerve injury (HR 1.2, 95% CI =1.1–1.3). A surgical delay of more than 2 weeks was noted to have a positive likelihood ratio of 2.3 for wound dehiscence and 3.1 for sural nerve injury. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that MIS and open repair techniques for acute ATRs demonstrate comparable complication rates. However, patients with elevated BMI exhibit an increased risk of re-rupture. Those with surgical delay beyond two weeks have an elevated likelihood of wound dehiscence and sural nerve injury, presumptively due to associated scaring and the requisite tissue manipulation. Surgeons and patients may consider these variables when formulating a surgical treatment plan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]