Search

The article discusses the partnership of pharmaceutical firm Medtronics with the Yale University Open Data Access (YODA) program aimed at evaluating the INFUSE bone morphogenetic protein-2 which was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The author believes that the partnership is a way of promoting open access of industry-sponsored research and transparency among stakeholders. The initiative would hopefully result to a convergent of conclusions and interpretations of data.

Editorial. Argues that we have not yet reached the point at which elective angioplasty should be performed with no possibility of backup surgery in case of serious complications. Controversial study by Meier, et al; More.

A correction to the article "Risks of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Dialysis-Dependent Patients--Analysis of the 2001 National Inpatient Sample" that was published in a 2007 issue is presented.

The advent of intravascular stenting dramatically reduced the incidence of restenosis among patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. However, a substantial percentage of patients, particularly those with risk factors such as diabetes mellitus or complicated lesions, remain at risk for restenosis. Drug-eluting stents overcome this problem by releasing bioactive agents from a polymeric coating directly into the vessel wall, inhibiting the cellular mechanisms of restenosis while avoiding systemic toxicity. Recent data indicate that local targeting of the proliferative process with drug-eluting stents dramatically reduces the risk for restenosis, even among high-risk patients. A range of bioactive coatings are currently available or in late clinical trials. Both sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents have demonstrated efficacy in a broad range of patient types; early data from clinical trials of second-generation stent coatings, such as everolimus and ABT-578 (zotarolimus), suggest that these agents are also effective in preventing restenosis. This article reviews the pathophysiology of in-stent restenosis and surveys recent key clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: The filter-based FilterWire EX (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) embolic protection system and the GuardWire (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA) balloon occlusion and aspiration device have been previously shown to reduce periprocedural complication rates of percutaneous coronary intervention for saphenous vein graft (SVG) disease and are considered the standard of care in this setting. The late clinical course after treatment with these devices has not been reported. Methods: In the FIRE trial, 651 patients undergoing SVG intervention were randomized to either the FilterWire EX or GuardWire. Six-month rates of the primary end point (composite major adverse cardiac events [MACE]) and its components (death, myocardial infarction [MI], or target vessel revascularization) were studied. Results: MACE at 30 days occurred in 9.9% of patients randomized to the FilterWire EX compared with 11.6% with the GuardWire, P = .53. By 6 months, MACE had increased to 19.3% and 21.9% in FilterWire EX and GuardWire groups, respectively, (relative risk 0.88, 95% CI 0.65-1.19; P = .44). All-cause 6-month mortality in the entire population was 3.5% (3.0% with FilterWire EX vs 4.1% with GuardWire, P = .53, with all deaths occurring after hospital discharge). MI occurred in 12.0% of patients at 6 months (12.1% vs 11.9% with the FilterWire EX and GuardWire, respectively, P = .99), and target vessel revascularization was required in 9.1% (8.2% vs 10.0%, respectively, P = .42). Conclusions: SVG intervention with the FilterWire EX and GuardWire distal protection devices resulted in similar outcomes at 6 months, although the clinical course after hospital discharge was not benign, with significant rates of death, MI, and repeat intervention. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Although clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) have been previously described (“primary” success rates), the fate of patients whose SES implantation fail and who require ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization is poorly understood. The SIRIUS trial is a prospective, randomized, clinical trial that includes 533 evaluable patients with SESs. Twenty-two of these patients had adjudicated ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (4.1%) within the first year of follow-up and comprised the study population of this analysis. Of these patients, 11 (50%) had diabetes, and restenotic lesions were focal and located at the proximal stent edge in 91% and 73% of patients, respectively. Restenosis was treated with bare metal stent implantation, balloon dilatation, or intravascular brachytherapy in 82%, 13.5%, and 4.5% of patients, respectively. At 1-year follow-up after the first recurrence (2-year follow-up after the index procedure), only 5 of these patients (23%) required a second repeat revascularization procedure. Risk factors for a second recurrence after treatment of SES restenosis were female gender, long lesions that required long stents at the index procedure, and an early first recurrence. In conclusion, SES failure treated with traditional percutaneous coronary intervention yielded good outcome at 1-year follow-up (secondary failure rate only 23%), perhaps due to the focal nature of the SES restenotic lesion. Future studies should evaluate other methods, including drug-eluting stents, to further optimize the outcome of treatment of SES failures. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Heart valve diseases are increasingly prevalent, especially in people older than age seventy. Many of these elderly people have other comorbid conditions, making them poor candidates for surgical treatment of heart valve diseases. Since 2011 such patients have been eligible to receive new nonsurgical heart valve treatments approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and covered by Medicare. This article examines the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry, which captures clinical information on all US patients undergoing new nonsurgical heart valve treatments. The registry has patient-level data from more than 27,000 patients treated with the novel devices. Patient- and procedurerelated data are gathered from hospitals, patient-reported outcomes are assessed pre- and postprocedure, and longer-term data on mortality and repeat hospitalization are provided by linking the registry's data to Medicare patient data. The registry is a model of collaboration among professional societies, the FDA, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, hospitals, patients, and the medical device industry. It has been used to support Medicare coverage decisions, expand device indications, provide comprehensive device surveillance, and establish national quality benchmarks. Beyond having it serve as a collaborative model, future goals for the registry include shortening the FDA-approval timeline for devices, providing data for decision-making tools for patients, and public reporting of hospital performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Carotid endarterectomy is more effective than medical management in the prevention of stroke in patients with severe symptomatic or asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid-artery stenosis. Stenting with the use of an emboli-protection device is a less invasive revascularization strategy than endarterectomy in carotid-artery disease. Methods: We conducted a randomized trial comparing carotid-artery stenting with the use of an emboli-protection device to endarterectomy in 334 patients with coexisting conditions that potentially increased the risk posed by endarterectomy and who had either a symptomatic carotid-artery stenosis of at least 50 percent of the luminal diameter or an asymptomatic stenosis of at least 80 percent. The primary end point of the study was the cumulative incidence of a major cardiovascular event at 1 year — a composite of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction within 30 days after the intervention or death or ipsilateral stroke between 31 days and 1 year. The study was designed to test the hypothesis that the less invasive strategy, stenting, was not inferior to endarterectomy. Results: The primary end point occurred in 20 patients randomly assigned to undergo carotid-artery stenting with an emboli-protection device (cumulative incidence, 12.2 percent) and in 32 patients randomly assigned to undergo endarterectomy (cumulative incidence, 20.1 percent; absolute difference, –7.9 percentage points; 95 percent confidence interval, –16.4 to 0.7 percentage points; P=0.004 for noninferiority, and P=0.053 for superiority). At one year, carotid revascularization was repeated in fewer patients who had received stents than in those who had undergone endarterectomy (cumulative incidence, 0.6 percent vs. 4.3 percent; P=0.04). Conclusions: Among patients with severe carotid-artery stenosis and coexisting conditions, carotid stenting with the use of an emboli-protection device is not inferior to carotid endarterectomy. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1493-501. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Zotarolimus-eluting phosphorylcholine-coated cobalt-chromium alloy Driver stents (ZES) demonstrated significant reductions in target lesion revascularization rate with few apparent adverse events compared with bare metal stents (BMS; uncoated Driver stents) in a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial in de novo coronary lesions. The aim of this study was to examine detailed vascular responses to ZES compared with BMS using serial intravascular ultrasound analysis. A total of 343 patients (ZES n = 178, BMS n = 165) were enrolled in this formal, prespecified intravascular ultrasound substudy of the Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Medtronic AVE Zotarolimus-Eluting Driver Coronary Stent in de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (ENDEAVOR II), a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial to compare ZES and BMS in de novo native coronary artery lesions. Quantitative and qualitative intravascular ultrasound analyses were performed postprocedurally and at 8-month follow-up in stented and reference segments. ZES showed significantly less neointima, with a larger lumen than BMS at 8 months (percentage neointimal volume 17.6 ± 10.1% vs 29.4 ± 17.2%, p <0.0001; maximum percentage neointimal area 32.9 ± 13.0% vs 47.6 ± 18.6%, p <0.0001; minimum luminal area 4.9 ± 1.6 vs 4.0 ± 1.7 mm2, p <0.0001) and no unfavorable edge effect. In the 18-mm single stents, ZES showed evenly inhibited neointima compared with BMS. Neither persistent stent-edge dissection nor late-acquired incomplete stent apposition was observed in either group. In conclusion, ZES showed evenly inhibited neointima with no apparent adverse vascular response in stented and reference segments at 8 months compared with BMS. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The SIRIUS study was a double-blinded, randomized trial of the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) to evaluate its effect on the rate of restenosis. The present report is a retrospective analysis of short- and long-term outcomes of SESs compared with bare metal stents (BMSs) in a subgroup of patients with unstable angina enrolled in the trial. Of 1,058 patients randomized in SIRIUS, 533 (50.4%) had unstable angina pectoris and 490 had stable angina. In the unstable angina group, patients treated with SESs and BMSs had similar clinical and angiographic characteristics. The stenting procedure was highly successful in the 2 groups (95.9% and 97.4%, respectively) with similar immediate angiographic results and short-term (in-hospital) clinical event rates. At 1-year follow-up, compared with BMSs, patients with unstable angina treated with SESs had significantly lower rates of target lesion revascularization (5.5% vs 22.3%, p <0.0001), target vessel failure (10.9% vs 26.3%, p <0.0001), and major adverse cardiac events (8.4% vs 24.8%, p <0.0001). Stent thrombosis was a rare event, with only 1 patient (0.4%) in each group during the first 30 days. Late thrombosis occurred in 2 patients (0.7%) in the BMS group but in none of the SES group. In conclusion, in the higher risk subgroup of patients with unstable angina, SESs are as safe as BMSs in decreasing restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization. This is reflected by a significant decrease in major adverse cardiac events and target vessel failure. Patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention who meet the entry criteria of the SIRIUS study should be preferentially treated with SESs. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Smaller reference vessel diameter is a recognized determinant of in-stent restenosis. The SIRIUS 2.25 trial was a prospective, nonrandomized study including 100 patients (mean age 63.4 years; 64% men, 40% with diabetes mellitus) assessing the safety and efficacy of the 2.25-mm sirolimus-eluting Bx Velocity stent in patients with de novo native coronary lesions. Using propensity score matching for gender, diabetes mellitus, left anterior descending artery target vessel, lesion length, and reference vessel diameter, the outcomes were compared with historical control groups (angioplasty and Palmaz-Schatz stent arms from the STRESS/BENESTENT I/II trials and the Bx Velocity bare metal stent arm from the RAVEL and SIRIUS trials having a reference vessel diameter <3 mm). Use of the 2.25-mm sirolimus-eluting Bx Velocity stent was associated with a high rate of procedural success (97%) and a low rate of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (2%). The primary end point, 6-month in-lesion binary angiographic restenosis, occurred less frequently in patients treated with the 2.25-mm sirolimus-eluting Bx Velocity stent than in each of 3 historical controls (16.9% vs 30.6%, p = 0.12; 36.5%, p <0.001; 45.9%, p <0.001, respectively). This translated into lower rates of 6-month target lesion revascularization in the 2.25-mm sirolimus-eluting Bx Velocity stent group (4.0% vs 15.0% in each of 3 control groups, p = 0.01 to <0.001). By multivariate analysis, in-lesion binary restenosis was predicted by multiple implanted stents (odds ratio 10.4, p = 0.002). Four of 13 patients who developed restenosis (30.8%) had a diffuse pattern of restenosis. In the long lesion tertile (mean lesion length 19.5 mm), the in-lesion binary restenosis rate was 27.6%. In conclusion, use of the 2.25-mm sirolimus-eluting Bx Velocity stent was safe and provided favorable 6-month clinical outcomes. Use of multiple stents (in longer lesions) was an independent predictor of in-lesion restenosis. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We assessed the effectiveness of intracoronary brachytherapy and compared treatment effects for the two radiation sources as well as the performance of the procedure in saphenous vein grafts (SVG) and native coronary arteries. Five randomized controlled trials comparing intracoronary brachytherapy with placebo involving a total of 1310 patients were reviewed for a meta-analysis. Risk differences (RD) for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), target vessel revascularization, target lesion revascularization, and angiographic binary restenosis at 6–12 months were computed, and a meta-regression analysis of MACE was performed. For MACE, the RD was 0.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09%–0.29%; P value, 0.00); there was significant between-study variance of 0.2395. In univariate meta-regression analyses, diabetes was a significant factor for the between-study variance ( P value, 0.000). In multivariate meta-regression analyses adjusted for diabetes and lesion length, neither gamma-radiation source nor SVG was a significant factor for the between-study variance ( P value, 0.675 and 0.433, respectively); the adjusted between-study variance was 0.000. Intra-coronary brachytherapy is effective compared with placebo at mid-term follow up. Neither procedure in SVG (gamma radiation) nor difference in radiation source (beta or gamma) in native coronary arteries was a significant factor in brachytherapy effectiveness compared to placebo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prospective follow-up at 2 years was obtained for 98.7% of the pooled 1,510 patients enrolled in SIRIUS, E-SIRIUS and C-SIRIUS, 3 randomized controlled trials that compared sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) with bare metal stents (BMSs) to treat long stenoses in small coronary arteries. By 720 days, clinically driven target lesion revascularizations were performed in 5.7% of patients with SESs versus 22.6% of patients with BMSs (risk ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.35, p <0.001). Of these, late target lesion revascularization (from 271 to 720 days) was performed in 12 patients who received SESs (1.6%) compared with 37 patients with BMSs (4.9%) (risk ratio 0.32, 0.17 to 0.61, p <0.001). Stent thromboses occurred in 7 of 758 patients with SESs (0.9%, 4 subacute, 3 late) and 5 of 752 patients with BMSs (0.7%, 1 subacute, 4 late) (risk ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 4.36, p = 0.774). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from major cardiac adverse events was 89.3% for patients with SESs versus 73.4% for patients with BMSs (p <0.001). This analysis demonstrates the sustained efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents at 2 years, characterized by a persistent significant benefit in freedom from repeat revascularization compared with BMSs and a low risk of late stent thrombosis, not different from BMSs. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Context Although vascular brachytherapy is the only approved therapy for restenosis following bare-metal stent implantation, drug-eluting stents are now being used. Data on the relative merits of each are limited. Objective To determine the safety and efficacy of the sirolimus-eluting stent compared with vascular brachytherapy for the treatment of patients with restenosis within a bare-metal stent. Design, Setting, and Patients Prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of 384 patients with in-stent restenosis who were enrolled between February 2003 and July 2004 at 26 academic and community medical centers. Data presented represent all follow-up as of June 30, 2005. Interventions Vascular brachytherapy (n = 125) or the sirolimus-eluting stent (n = 259). Main Outcome Measure Target vessel failure (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization) at 9 months postprocedure. Results Baseline patient characteristics were well matched. Lesion length was similar between vascular brachytherapy and sirolimus-eluting stent patients (mean [SD], 16.76 [8.55] mm vs 17.22 [7.97] mm, respectively; P = .61). Procedural success was 99.2% (124/125) in the vascular brachytherapy group and 97.3% (250/257) in the sirolimus-eluting stent group (P = .28). The rate of target vessel failure was 21.6% (27/125) with vascular brachytherapy and 12.4% (32/259) with the sirolimus-eluting stent (relative risk [RR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.8; P = .02). Target lesion revascularization was required in 19.2% (24/125) of the vascular brachytherapy group and 8.5% (22/259) of the sirolimus-eluting stent group (RR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.3-3.9]; P = .004). At follow-up angiography, the rate of binary angiographic restenosis for the analysis segment was 29.5% (31/105) for the vascular brachytherapy group and 19.8% (45/227) for the sirolimus-eluting stent group (RR, 1.5 [95% CI, 1.0-2.2]; P = .07). Compared with the vascular brachytherapy group, minimal lumen diameter was larger in the sirolimus-eluting stent group at 6-month follow-up (mean [SD], 1.52 [0.63] mm vs 1.80 [0.63] mm; P<.001), reflecting greater net lumen gain in the analysis segment (0.68 [0.60] vs 1.0 [0.61] mm; P<.001) due to stenting and no edge restenosis. Conclusion Sirolimus-eluting stents result in superior clinical and angiographic outcomes compared with vascular brachytherapy for the treatment of restenosis within a bare-metal stent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Using a method that creates anatomically correct, 3-dimensional arterial reconstructions, 55 minimally diseased coronary arteries from 40 patients were studied. Homogenous remodeling characteristics along the entire length of the artery were observed in 48 arteries (87%). In the aggregate, arteries exhibited compensatory expansive remodeling. Individually, the full spectrum of compensatory expansive remodeling (60%), excessive expansive remodeling (21%), and constrictive remodeling (19%) was observed across arteries. Each artery was consistent in its remodeling characteristics from proximal to distal portions of the artery, and the remodeling pattern of each artery was independent within the same patient. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: This study was a randomized, patient- and evaluator-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in patients treated using percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization. Background: Previous studies using similar therapies have been confounded by placebo bias. Methods: A total of 298 patients with severe angina were randomly assigned to receive low-dose or high-dose myocardial laser channels or no laser channels, blinded as a sham procedure. The primary end point was the change in exercise duration from baseline examination to six months. Results: The incidence of 30-day death, stroke, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, or left ventricular perforation occurred in two patients in the placebo, eight patients in the low-dose, and four patients in the high-dose groups (p = 0.12); 30-day myocardial infarction incidence was higher in patients receiving either low-dose or high-dose laser (nine patients) compared with placebo (no patients, p = 0.03). At six months, there were no differences in the change in exercise duration between those receiving a sham (28.0 s, n = 100), low-dose laser (33.2 s, n = 98), or high-dose laser (28.0 s, n = 98, p = 0.94) procedure. There were also no differences in the proportion of patients improving to better than Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III angina symptoms at six months. The follow-up visual summed stress single-photon-emission computed tomography scores were not significantly different from baseline in any group and were no different between groups. The modest improvement in angina symptoms assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire also was not statistically different among the arms. Conclusions: Treatment with percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization provides no benefit beyond that of a similar sham procedure in patients blinded to their treatment status. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Selection of coronary stent length varies from covering only the zone of maximum obstruction to stenting from normal- to normal-appearing vessels. With bare metal stenting, for any given lesion there is a high restenotic risk associated with longer stent length. With drug-eluting stents, the relation between stent length and restenosis has not been evaluated. In the angiographic follow-up cohort of the SIRIUS trial that compared the sirolimus-eluting Bx Velocity stent with the standard Bx Velocity stent (n = 699), we constructed a multiple regression model to predict 8-month percent diameter stenosis using the main effects of lesion length and excess stent length beyond the lesion length and adjusting for known predictors of restenosis. Stent length exceeded lesion length in 94% of lesions overall. Mean difference in length was 8.3 ± 8.3 mm (mean lesion length 14.6 ± 5.9 mm, mean stent length 22.9 ± 9.6 mm). Stented lesion length and excess stent length were associated with absolute increases in percent diameter stenosis per 10 mm of 9.1% (p &#60;0.0001) and 3.6% (p = 0.053) in the bare metal arm and 3.5% (p = 0.047) and 2.1% (p = 0.040) in the sirolimus-eluting stent arm. Although the effects of lesion length and excess stent length on restenosis were markedly decreased with sirolimus-eluting stents (vs bare metal stents), a small restenotic penalty is still paid for excessive stent length. Longer stent-to-lesion length strategies should be used only when a shorter stent is likely to result in incomplete lesion coverage and edge dissection, a strong determinant of stent thrombosis. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Despite the similar extent of epicardial coronary artery disease and procedural success, women have been noted to have a twofold higher incidence of in-hospital mortality and vascular complications than men undergoing coronary artery stenting. This analysis of 1,908 women from a pooled data set of 6,186 patients is the largest reported series of prospectively collected data from the contemporary stent era. This study demonstrates that stenting can be performed in women with excellent acute results with no age-independent increase in short- or long-term mortality compared with men, although with a significantly higher risk of vascular complications. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The Safe-Cross radiofrequency guidewire (IntraLuminal Therapeutics, Carlsbad, California) combines 3 capabilities: (1) steerability of a conventional 0.014-in intermediate-stiffness guidewire, (2) optical coherence reflectometry to warn the operator when the wire tip approaches within 1 mm of the vessel wall, and (3) delivery of radiofrequency energy pulses to the wire tip to facilitate passage through an occluded segment. The Guided Radio Frequency Energy Ablation of Total Occlusions Registry was a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter registry that enrolled 116 patients who had long-term coronary total occlusions and in whom a >10-minute good-faith attempt to cross the occlusion using conventional guidewires had failed. The median known duration of occlusion was 22 months (32%; >1 year), and the median length of the occluded segment was 25 mm (25%; >30 mm). Device success was achieved in 63 of 116 of patients (54.3%), and major adverse events occurred in 6.9%, consisting predominantly of isolated increases in cardiac enzymes with no procedure-related deaths, Q-wave myocardial infarctions, or emergency bypass operations. Clinical perforation occurred in 2.6% of patients; of these, perforation in only 1 patient (0.9%) was adjudicated to be directly related to the Safe-Cross radiofrequency wire rather than to the stiff and/or hydrophilic wires used after an inability to advance with the Safe-Cross. Based on these data, the device has been approved in Europe and was recently (January 2004) granted 510K clearance by the Food and Drug Administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study was designed to evaluate the effect of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) on mortality according to success of the stent procedure.The mortality effect of periprocedural MI relative to successful versus unsuccessful procedures has not been examined.All-cause mortality during the first year was evaluated prospectively among 5,850 patients from coronary stent clinical trials. Myocardial infarction was classified according to creatine kinase-MB level as type 1 (>1 but <3 times normal), type 2 (≥3 but ≤8 times normal), or type 3 (>8 times normal or Q-wave MI). Procedures were classified as successful unless there was a final diameter stenosis >50%; final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade <3; final National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute dissection grade ≥D; repeat revascularization within 24 h; or stent thrombosis within 24 h.Myocardial infarction was more frequent after unsuccessful procedures (69.6% vs. 20.4%, p < 0.001). Mortality during the first year was higher in patients with MI (2.8% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.01), but the effect was significant only for type 3 MI (4.7% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.008). Moreover, the mortality difference for any MI was confined to patients with unsuccessful procedures (13.1% vs. 0%, p = 0.03), with no significant effect among patients with otherwise successful procedures (2.1% vs. 1.7%, p > 0.20). The independent predictors of mortality were unsuccessful procedure (p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.001), history of prior MI (p = 0.003), multivessel disease (p = 0.006), and advancing age (p < 0.001), but not periprocedural MI.The association of periprocedural MI with increased mortality during the first year following stent placement was confined to patients with unsuccessful procedures. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The choice of drug-eluting versus bare metal stents is based on costs and expectations of restenosis and thrombosis risk. Approaches to stent placement vary from covering just the zone of maximal obstruction to stenting well beyond the lesion boundaries (normal-to-normal vessel). The independent effects of stented lesion length, nonstented lesion length, and excess stent length, on coronary restenosis have not been evaluated for bare metal or drug-eluting stents. We analyzed the angiographic follow-up cohort (1,181 patients) from 6 recent bare metal stent trials of de novo lesions in native coronary arteries. Stent length exceeded lesion length in 87% of lesions (mean lesion length 12.4 ± 6.3 mm, mean stent length 20.0 ± 7.9 mm, mean difference 7.6 ± 7.9 mm). At 6- to 9-month follow-up, the mean percent diameter stenosis was 39.1 ± 20.1%. In an adjusted multivariable model of percent diameter stenosis, each 10 mm of stented lesion length was associated with an absolute increase in percent diameter stenosis of 7.7% (p <0.0001), whereas each 10 mm of excess stent length independently increased percent diameter stenosis by 4.0% (p <0.0001) and increased target lesion revascularization at 9 months (odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.24). Significant nonstented lesion length was uncommon (12.5% of cases). In summary, stent length exceeded lesion length in most stented lesions, and the amount of excess stent length increased the risk of restenosis independent of the stented lesion length. This analysis supports a conservative approach of matching stent length to lesion length to reduce the risk of restenosis with bare metal stents. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]