Search

J. Slama, P. Freitag, P. Dundr, J. Duskova, D. Fischerova, M. Zikan, I. Pinkavova and D. Cibula Outcomes of pregnant patients with Pap smears classified as atypical glandular cells Objectives: The incidence of cervical cancers increases with age. Due to the trend of increasing age of first pregnancy, abnormal Pap smears including those classified as atypical glandular cells (AGC) are being found more often in early pregnancy. Once invasive cancer is excluded, conservative management of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) in pregnancy is considered safe; however, optimal management of AGC is not well established. The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with AGC diagnosed from smears during pregnancy. Methods: The study included 17 patients referred to us in early pregnancy with Pap smears reported as AGC: 11 not otherwise specified (AGC-NOS), five favour neoplasia (AGC-FN) and one adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS). Thirty-one with high-grade SIL (HSIL) Pap smears confirmed on punch biopsy in early pregnancy comprised a control group. Human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity was found in seven patients with persistent AGC-NOS (including all four who had CIN3 postpartum). All the women were initially examined by expert colposcopy and those with AGC-FN or AIS smears also by transrectal ultrasound to exclude invasive endocervical cancer. Follow-up controls were carried out every 8-12 weeks and, if there were no signs of progression, revaluation was scheduled 6-8 weeks after delivery. Results: The mean age of the women was 31.4 years. Conization in one patient in the study group was performed in the 16th week of pregnancy due to colposcopic signs of microinvasive squamous cell cancer confirmed on histology. Progression to invasive cancer was not found in any of the other 16 patients in the study group or in the control group. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or AIS was confirmed postpartum by conization or punch biopsy in 47.1% (8/17) of patients in the study group and, in 77.4% (24/31) of patients in the control group. Conclusions: Conservative management of women with AGC in pregnancy is safe where invasive cancer is excluded. As histological verification of glandular pre-cancerous lesions by punch biopsy is not reliable and the postpartum regression rate cannot be determined precisely, conization should be performed in all cases with AGC-FN or AIS. Triage of persistent AGC-NOS with HPV testing is useful in distinguishing significant underlying lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objectives. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is used in locally advanced cervical cancers with the aim to decrease the size of the tumor and to allow for less radical surgery. Despite of the fact that the high response rate of the tumor has been well established, the impact of NAC on sentinel lymph node (SN) detection and status has not been explored to date. Methods. Our study included 82 patients with locally advanced cervical cancers (FIGO IB1 >3cm, IB2, IIA2 and selected IIB) out of which 51 patients were referred to SN biopsy prior to NAC and 31 patients to radical surgical procedure including SN biopsy after three courses of “dose density” NAC. In both groups, the prevalence of macrometastases, micrometastases and isolated tumor cells (ITC) in SN was compared. Results. The total of 179 SNs was evaluated. SN detection rate in the whole cohort reached 87.8% per patient and 60.9% bilaterally, without significant difference between both groups. In the group with upfront SN biopsy prior to NAC the prevalence of macrometastases, micrometastases and ITC amounted to 43.1% (22/51), 7.8% (4/51) and 7.8% (4/51) respectively. In the group with SN biopsy after previous NAC, macrometastases were detected in 22.6 (7/31) of patients in SN, whereas there was only one micrometastasis and no ITC detected in that group. Conclusions. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not influence the detection rate of SNs, yet it was associated with significantly reduced prevalence of metastatic involvement of SNs, especially almost completely eliminating low volume disease. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective To develop a logistic regression model that can discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses perceived to be difficult to classify by subjective evaluation of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings (subjective assessment) and to compare its diagnostic performance with that of subjective assessment, serum CA 125 and the risk of malignancy index (RMI). Methods We used data from the 3511 patients with an adnexal mass included in the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) studies. All patients had been examined using transvaginal gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound following a standardized research protocol carried out by an experienced ultrasound examiner using a high-end ultrasound system. In addition to prospectively collecting information on > 40 clinical and ultrasound variables, the ultrasound examiner classified each mass as certainly or probably benign, unclassifiable, or certainly or probably malignant. A logistic regression model to discriminate between benignity and malignancy was developed for the unclassifiable masses ( n = 244, i.e. 7% of all tumors) using a training set (160 tumors, 45 malignancies) and then tested on a test set (84 tumors, 28 malignancies). The gold standard was the histological diagnosis of the surgically removed adnexal mass. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR−) were used to describe diagnostic performance and were compared between subjective assessment, CA 125, the RMI and the logistic regression model created. Results One variable was retained in the logistic regression model: the largest diameter (in mm) of the largest solid component of the tumor (odds ratio (OR) = 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06). The model had an AUC of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.59-0.78) on the training set and an AUC of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.53-0.78) on the test set. On the test set, a cut-off of 25% probability of malignancy (corresponding to the largest diameter of the largest solid component of 23 mm) resulted in a sensitivity of 64% (18/28), a specificity of 55% (31/56), an LR+ of 1.44 and an LR− of 0.65. The corresponding values for subjective assessment were 68% (19/28), 59% (33/56), 1.65 and 0.55. On the test set of patients with available CA 125 results, the LR+ and LR− of the logistic regression model (cut-off = 25% probability of malignancy) were 1.29 and 0.73, of subjective assessment were 1.45 and 0.63, of CA 125 (cut-off = 35 U/mL) were 1.24 and 0.84 and of RMI (cut-off = 200) were 1.21 and 0.92. Conclusions About 7% of adnexal masses that are considered appropriate for surgical removal cannot be classified as benign or malignant by experienced ultrasound examiners using subjective assessment. Logistic regression models to estimate the risk of malignancy, CA 125 measurements and the RMI are not helpful in these masses. Copyright © 2011 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To describe the clinical history and ultrasound findings in patients with ovarian dysgerminoma. Methods This was a retrospective study of patients with a histological diagnosis of ovarian dysgerminoma who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination. The patients were identified from the databases of 11 ultrasound centers. The tumors were described by the principal investigator at each contributing center on the basis of ultrasound images, ultrasound reports and research protocols (when applicable) using the terms and definitions of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group. In addition, three authors reviewed all available electronic ultrasound images (gray-scale images and color/power Doppler images were available for 18 patients and 14 patients, respectively) and described them using subjective evaluation of gray-scale and color Doppler ultrasound findings (here called pattern recognition). Results Twenty-one patients with ovarian dysgerminoma were identified (including one woman with bilateral masses). Twenty patients had a primary ovarian dysgerminoma (including the one with bilateral masses) and one patient had a recurrence of dysgerminoma in her retained ovary. One of the 21 patients was pregnant. All tumors except one were pure dysgerminomas, one being a mixed germinal cell tumor with 30% dysgerminoma component. Median age was 20 (range, 16-31) years. Information on clinical symptoms was available for 18 patients. In four patients, the tumor was detected incidentally, whereas 14 patients presented with one or more of the following symptoms: acute pain (n = 4), chronic pain (n = 8), bloating (n = 8), menstrual disorders (n = 5) and infertility problems (n = 1). One (5%) patient had ascites. Using the IOTAterms and definitions, all but one dysgerminoma were moderately (43%) or very well (50%) vascularized solid tumors. One tumor was multilocular-solid. According to pattern recognition, most dysgerminomas were highly vascularized, purely solid tumors with heterogeneous internal echogenicity divided into several lobules, had a smooth and sometimes lobulated contour and were well-defined relative to the surrounding organs. Conclusion The ultrasound finding of a highly vascularized, large, solid, lobulated adnexal mass with irregular internal echogenicity in a woman 20-30 years old should raise the suspicion of ovarian dysgerminoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a study which aims to confirm the diagnostic capability of two logistic regression models that contain ultrasound and clinical variables to calculate the malignancy in adnexal masses. The study involved 1938 patients with adnexal masses, who underwent to transvaginal ultrasound assessment by a radiologist or a gynecologist skilled in ultrasonography. Results show that both models provide accurate differentiation between malignant and benign masses.

The article presents a prospective study on the association of ovarian crescent sign (OCS) in benign and malignant adnexal pathology. The study covers 1,938 patients with an adnexal mass who underwent the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Phase 2 study on various centers globally. The patients, some were evaluated of OCS, were scanned using ultrasound based on the same IOTA protocol. Moreover, it shows that the presence of the OCS is not associated with malignant adnexal masses.

The article presents a study on the ultrasound characteristics of endometriomas in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients. Also included in the study is the development of rules that characterize endometriomas. The study suggests that masses in postmenopausal women whose cystic contents have a ground glass appearance have a high risk of malignancy.

Abstract: Objectives: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy can significantly contribute to the management of locally advanced cervical cancers with high risk of lymph node (LN) positivity. However, low detection rate and sensitivity were reported in larger tumors, albeit on a small number of cases. It was the aim of our study to verify the SLN reliability in large tumors, with modified dye application technique and a careful identification of side-specific lymphatic drainage. Methods: The study involved 44 patients with tumors 3 cm in diameter or larger, stages IB1 to IIA, or selected IIB. In cases where SLN could not be detected, systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed on the respective side. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed during the second step radical procedure if not already done. Results: Detection rate in the whole cohort reached 77% per patient and 59% bilaterally. No significant difference was found whether a blue dye or a combined method was used (75% vs 80%, and 55% vs 67%). Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in cases with undetected SLN unilaterally in 8 and bilaterally in 10 women. A systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy was included in the second step radical procedure in 19 cases and no positive LN were found. There was no case of false-negative SLN result in patients who underwent surgical treatment. Conclusion: Detection rate in locally advanced cervical cancer could be improved by a careful dye application technique. Low false-negative SLN rate could be achieved if pelvic lymphatic drainage is evaluated on a side-specific principle by performing systematic lymphadenectomy if SLN is not detected. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group statement[1] is the first international consensus on nomenclature and measurements in endometriosis imaging. Modifications of the IDEA consensus for MRI use seem to be of importance as many centers use MRI as their imaging modality of choice. [Extracted from the article]

Competing Interests: Competing interests: IR-C has reported advisory boards for Abbvie, Agenus, Advaxis, Blueprint, BMS, ESAÏ, Daichi Sankyo, PharmaMar, Genmab, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, GSK, MSD, Deciphera, Mersana, Merck Sereno, Macrogenics, Novartis, Amgen, Tesaro and Clovis, and grants for traveling from Roche, MSD, AstraZeneca, Chugai and GSK; PG-C has reported Institution research grants from Advenchen Laboratories, Amgen Dompé, AROG Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Deciphera, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Epizyme Inc, Foghorn Ther Inc, Glaxo, Hutchinson MediPharam Lt, Inhibrx Inc, Karyopharm Pharmaceuticals, PTC Ther, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Rain Oncology, and SpringWorks Ther; RJ has reported advisory boards for Adaptimmune, Astex, Athenex, Bayer, Borhringer Ingelheim, Blueprint, Clinigen, Eisai, Epizume, Daichii, Deciphera, Immunedesign, Immunicum, Karma Oncology, Lilly, Merck, Mundipharma, PharmaMar, Springworks, SynOx, Tracon, and Upto Date; RS has reported grants for traveling from ParmaMar; FA has reported advisory boards for MiMark; J-YB has reported advisory boards for Deciphera, Bayer and Roche, and grants for traveling from OSE Pharma (unrelated); JM-B has reported advisory boards for Asofarma, Tecnofarma, FarmaMar, GSK, Novartis, Amgen, Bayer, Roche, Lilly and Boehringer Ingelheim, and grants for traveling from PharmaMar; AC has reported advisory boards for AstraZeneca and EISAI, and grants for traveling from PharmaMar, Merck and AstraZeneca; APDT has reported advisory boards for GSK, Boehringer and Novartis Oncology, and grants for traveling from PharmaMar; MLH has reported advisory boards for Aadi; PH has reported advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim and PharmaMar, and grants for traveling from Boehringer Ingelheim, PharmaMar, and Lighthouse PTC; PP has reported advisory boards for PharmaMar and MSD, and grants for traveling from Amgen, PharmaMar, AstraZeneca, and MSD; ARAR has reported research support (institutional) from 23&Me, Abbisko, AbbVie, Adaptimmune, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biontech, Blueprint Medicine, Boehringer Ingleheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cogent Biosciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Deciphera, Frontier Biopharma, Gilead, GSK, Iterion Therapeutics, Karyopharm Therapeutics, MedImmune, Medison, Merck, Neoleukin, Novartis, Pfizer, Polaris, Roche/Genentech, Rain Therapeutics, and Symphogen, expert testimony/advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim and Medison, DSMB (self) for Inhibrx, and honorarium (self) from Journal of Clinical Oncology, Medison and UpToDate; JS has reported advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Eisai, MSD, GSK, Novocure, Intuitive Surgical Deutschland GmbH, Seagan, Bayer Vital, GmbH, Mundipharma GmbH, PharmaMar, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Immunogen, Tubulis GmbH, and Daiichi Sankyo, and grants for traveling from AstraZeneca, Eisai, MSD, GSK, Novocure, Intuitive Surgical Deutschland GmbH, Seagan, Bayer Vital, GmbH, Mundipharma GmbH; PharmaMar, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Immunogen, Tubulis GmbH, Daiichi Sankyo; WvH has reported advisory boards for Sanofi, Belpharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, and Novartis, and grants for traveling from Sanofi; MF has reported consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, GSK, and Incyclix, payment for honoraria for lectures, presentations, spearkers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, GSK, MSD, and Limbic, participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AGITG IDSMB, and ENDO-3, and research grants (institution) from AstraZeneca, Beigene and Novartis; SCr, FMF, DF, IZ, SCh, RH, J-WK, SIK, MMM, and FP have reported no conflicts of interest.

Preoperative sonographic staging in patients with suspected parametrial endometriosis is essential to plan surgical intervention and anticipate the need for a multidisciplinary approach, and thus optimize surgical outcome. The results of a recent meta-analysis suggest that there is a need to define more accurately the ultrasonographic criteria for parametrial involvement in endometriosis. This addendum to the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) consensus highlights the sonographic characteristics of the parametrium and identifies ultrasound techniques to diagnose deep endometriosis in this area. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology., (© 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

Objectives: To assess the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography in pre-operative assessment of lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer, to compare the outcomes for pelvic and para-aortic regions, and to detect macrometastases and micrometastases separately., Methods: Patients were retrospectively included if they met the following inclusion criteria: pathologically verified cervical cancer; ultrasonography performed by one of four experienced sonographers; surgical lymph node staging, at least in the pelvic region-sentinel lymph node biopsy or systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy or debulking. The final pathological examination was the reference standard., Results: 390 patients met the inclusion criteria between 2009 and 2019. Pelvic node macrometastases (≥2 mm) were confirmed in 54 patients (13.8%), and micrometastases (≥0.2 mm and <2 mm) in another 21 patients (5.4%). Ultrasonography had sensitivity 72.2%, specificity 94.0%, and area under the curve (AUC) 0.831 to detect pelvic macrometastases, while sensitivity 53.3%, specificity 94.0%, and AUC 0.737 to detect both pelvic macrometastases and micrometastases (pN1). Ultrasonography failed to detect pelvic micrometastases, with sensitivity 19.2%, specificity 85.2%, and AUC 0.522. There was no significant impact of body mass index on diagnostic accuracy. Metastases in para-aortic nodes (macrometastases only) were confirmed in 16 of 71 patients who underwent para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Ultrasonography yielded sensitivity 56.3%, specificity 98.2%, and AUC 0.772 to identify para-aortic node macrometastases., Conclusion: Ultrasonography performed by an experienced sonographer can be considered a sufficient diagnostic tool for pre-operative assessment of lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer, showing similar diagnostic accuracy in detection of pelvic macrometastases as reported for other imaging methods (18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT or diffusion-weighted imaging/MRI). It had low sensitivity for detection of small-volume macrometastases (largest diameter <5 mm) and micrometastases. The accuracy of para-aortic assessment was comparable to that for pelvic lymph nodes, and assessment of the para-aortic region should be an inseparable part of the examination protocol., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: In addition to the diagnostic accuracy of imaging methods, patient-reported satisfaction with imaging methods is important., Objective: To report a secondary outcome of the prospective international multicenter Imaging Study in Advanced ovArian Cancer (ISAAC Study), detailing patients' experience with abdomino-pelvic ultrasound, whole-body contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), and whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (WB-DWI/MRI) for pre-operative ovarian cancer work-up., Methods: In total, 144 patients with suspected ovarian cancer at four institutions in two countries (Italy, Czech Republic) underwent ultrasound, CT, and WB-DWI/MRI for pre-operative work-up between January 2020 and November 2022. After having undergone all three examinations, the patients filled in a questionnaire evaluating their overall experience and experience in five domains: preparation before the examination, duration of examination, noise during the procedure, radiation load of CT, and surrounding space. Pain perception, examination-related patient-perceived unexpected, unpleasant, or dangerous events ('adverse events'), and preferred method were also noted., Results: Ultrasound was the preferred method by 49% (70/144) of responders, followed by CT (38%, 55/144), and WB-DWI/MRI (13%, 19/144) (p<0.001). The poorest experience in all domains was reported for WB-DWI/MRI, which was also associated with the largest number of patients who reported adverse events (eg, dyspnea). Patients reported higher levels of pain during the ultrasound examination than during CT and WB-DWI/MRI (p<0.001): 78% (112/144) reported no pain or mild pain, 19% (27/144) moderate pain, and 3% (5/144) reported severe pain (pain score >7 of 10) during the ultrasound examination. We did not identify any factors related to patients' preferred method., Conclusion: Ultrasound was the imaging method preferred by most patients despite being associated with more pain during the examination in comparison with CT and WB-DWI/MRI., Trial Registration Number: NCT03808792., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Several diagnostic prediction models to help clinicians discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses are available. This study is a head-to-head comparison of the performance of the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model with that of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA)., Methods: This is a retrospective study based on prospectively included consecutive women with an adnexal tumour scheduled for surgery at five oncology centres and one non-oncology centre in four countries between 2015 and 2019. The reference standard was histology. Model performance for ADNEX and ROMA was evaluated regarding discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility., Results: The primary analysis included 894 patients, of whom 434 (49%) had a malignant tumour. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.95) for ADNEX with CA125, 0.90 (0.84-0.94) for ADNEX without CA125, and 0.85 (0.80-0.89) for ROMA. ROMA, and to a lesser extent ADNEX, underestimated the risk of malignancy. Clinical utility was highest for ADNEX. ROMA had no clinical utility at decision thresholds <27%., Conclusions: ADNEX had better ability to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal tumours and higher clinical utility than ROMA., Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT01698632 and NCT02847832., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

In recent years the role of diagnostic imaging by pelvic ultrasound in the diagnosis and staging of gynecological cancers has been growing exponentially. Evidence from recent prospective multicenter studies has demonstrated high accuracy for pre-operative locoregional ultrasound staging in gynecological cancers. Therefore, in many leading gynecologic oncology units, ultrasound is implemented next to pelvic MRI as the first-line imaging modality for gynecological cancer. The work herein is a consensus statement on the role of pre-operative imaging by ultrasound and other imaging modalities in gynecological cancer, following European Society guidelines., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.)

Following the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) joint guidelines (2018) for the management of patients with cervical cancer, treatment decisions should be guided by modern imaging techniques. After five years (2023), an update of the ESGO-ESTRO-ESP recommendations was performed, further confirming this statement. Transvaginal/transrectal ultrasound (TRS/TVS) or pelvic magnetic resonance (MRI) enables tumor delineation and precise assessment of its local extent, including the evaluation of the depth of infiltration in the bladder- or rectal wall. Additionally, both techniques have very high specificity to confirm the presence of metastatic pelvic lymph nodes but fail to exclude them due to insufficient sensitivity to detect small-volume metastases, as in any other currently available imaging modality. In early-stage disease (T1a to T2a1, except T1b3) with negative lymph nodes on TVS/TRS or MRI, surgicopathological staging should be performed. In all other situations, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) or 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with CT (PET-CT) is recommended to assess extrapelvic spread. This paper aims to review the evidence supporting the implementation of diagnostic imaging with a focus on ultrasound at primary diagnostic workup of cervical cancer.

Objective: To describe the clinical and sonographic characteristics of benign, retroperitoneal, pelvic peripheral-nerve-sheath tumors (PNSTs)., Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients with a benign, retroperitoneal, pelvic PNST who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination at a single gynecologic oncology center between 1 January 2018 and 31 August 2022. All ultrasound images, videoclips and final histological specimens of benign PNSTs were reviewed side-by-side in order to: describe the ultrasound appearance of the tumors, using the terminology of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA), Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) and Vulvar International Tumor Analysis (VITA) groups, following a predefined ultrasound assessment form; describe their origin in relation to nerves and pelvic anatomy; and assess the association between their ultrasound features and histotopography. A review of the literature reporting benign, retroperitoneal, pelvic PNSTs with preoperative ultrasound examination was performed., Results: Five women (mean age, 53 years) with a benign, retroperitoneal, pelvic PNST were identified, four with a schwannoma and one with a neurofibroma, of which all were sporadic and solitary. All patients had good-quality ultrasound images and videoclips and final biopsy of surgically excised tumors, except one patient managed conservatively who had only a core needle biopsy. In all cases, the findings were incidental. The five PNSTs ranged in maximum diameter from 31 to 50 mm. All five PNSTs were solid, moderately vascular tumors, with non-uniform echogenicity, well-circumscribed by hyperechogenic epineurium and with no acoustic shadowing. Most of the masses were round (n = 4 (80%)), and contained small, irregular, anechoic, cystic areas (n = 3 (60%)) and hyperechogenic foci (n = 5 (100%)). In the woman with a schwannoma in whom surgery was not performed, follow-up over a 3-year period showed minimal growth (1.5 mm/year) of the mass. We also summarize the findings of 47 cases of benign retroperitoneal schwannoma and neurofibroma identified in a literature search., Conclusions: On ultrasound examination, no imaging characteristics differentiate reliably between benign schwannomas and neurofibromas. Moreover, benign PNSTs show some similar features to malignant retroperitoneal tumors. They are solid lesions with intralesional blood vessels and show degenerative changes such as cystic areas and hyperechogenic foci. Therefore, ultrasound-guided biopsy may play a pivotal role in their diagnosis. If confirmed to be benign PNSTs, these tumors can be managed conservatively, with ultrasound surveillance. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology., (© 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

Maximal-effort upfront or interval debulking surgery is the recommended approach for advanced-stage ovarian cancer. The role of diagnostic imaging is to provide a systematic and structured report on tumour dissemination with emphasis on key sites for resectability. Imaging methods, such as pelvic and abdominal ultrasound, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography, yield high diagnostic performance for diagnosing bulky disease, but they are less accurate for depicting small-volume carcinomatosis, which may lead to unnecessary explorative laparotomies. Diagnostic laparoscopy, on the other hand, may directly visualize intraperitoneal involvement but has limitations in detecting tumours beyond the gastrosplenic ligament, in the lesser sac, mesenteric root or in the retroperitoneum. Laparoscopy has its place in combination with imaging in cases where ima-ging results regarding resectability are unclear. Different imaging models predicting tumour resectability have been developed as an adjunctional objective tool. Incorporating results from tumour quantitative analyses (e.g., radiomics), preoperative biopsies and biomarkers into predictive models may allow for more precise selection of patients eligible for extensive surgery. This review will discuss the ability of imaging and laparoscopy to predict non-resectable disease in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Objective: Previous work has suggested that the ultrasound-based benign simple descriptors (BDs) can reliably exclude malignancy in a large proportion of women presenting with an adnexal mass. This study aimed to validate a modified version of the BDs and to validate a two-step strategy to estimate the risk of malignancy, in which the modified BDs are followed by the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model if modified BDs do not apply., Methods: This was a retrospective analysis using data from the 2-year interim analysis of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Phase-5 study, in which consecutive patients with at least one adnexal mass were recruited irrespective of subsequent management (conservative or surgery). The main outcome was classification of tumors as benign or malignant, based on histology or on clinical and ultrasound information during 1 year of follow-up. Multiple imputation was used when outcome based on follow-up was uncertain according to predefined criteria., Results: A total of 8519 patients were recruited at 36 centers between 2012 and 2015. We excluded patients who were already in follow-up at recruitment and all patients from 19 centers that did not fulfil our criteria for good-quality surgical and follow-up data, leaving 4905 patients across 17 centers for statistical analysis. Overall, 3441 (70%) tumors were benign, 978 (20%) malignant and 486 (10%) uncertain. The modified BDs were applicable in 1798/4905 (37%) tumors, of which 1786 (99.3%) were benign. The two-step strategy based on ADNEX without CA125 had an area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.96). The risk of malignancy was slightly underestimated, but calibration varied between centers. A sensitivity analysis in which we expanded the definition of uncertain outcome resulted in 1419 (29%) tumors with uncertain outcome and an AUC of the two-step strategy without CA125 of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.95)., Conclusion: A large proportion of adnexal masses can be classified as benign by the modified BDs. For the remaining masses, the ADNEX model can be used to estimate the risk of malignancy. This two-step strategy is convenient for clinical use. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology., (© 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

Competing Interests: Disclosure CS has reported non-remunerated activities as Coordinator Gynecological Programme for the European School of Oncology. JB has reported fees for advisory board membership for AstraZeneca and Pfizer; fees paid to her institute for roles as local principal investigator for AstraZeneca, MedSire and Pfizer. SLB has reported fees as an author for UpToDate. She has also reported non-remunerated activities as the chair of the Scientific Network on Female Sexual Health and Cancer (academic organisation). MJC has reported fees as an invited speaker for Roche (industry-sponsored symposium in National Conference). She has also reported non-remunerated activities as a member of the Board of Directors of EUSOMA, faculty member of ESO, project lead/lead investigator for the Breast Research Group of INESC TEC and President of MAMA Help (non-profit association for breast cancer patients in Portugal). She serves as a Specialty Editor for The Breast. NC has reported fees for advisory board membership for AstraZeneca, BIOCAD, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), ImmunoGen, Mersana, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD)/Merck, Nuvation Bio, OncXerna, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Pieris and Roche; fees as an invited speaker for AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, GSK and MSD/Merck; institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, PharmaMar and Roche. She has also reported non-remunerated activities as member of the ESMO Guidelines Steering Committee and chair of the Scientific Committee of Alleanza contro il Tumore Ovarico (ACTO). GC has reported fees for advisory board membership for AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Celcuity, Daiichi Sankyo, Ellipsis, Exact Sciences, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, Roche and Veracyte; fees as an invited speaker for AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche; fees for a writing engagement from Pfizer; institutional research grant from Merck for an investigator-initiated trial; institutional funding for phase I studies from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicine, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Kymab, Novartis, Philogen, Relay Therapeutics, (coordinating principal investigator), Roche and Sanofi. He has also reported non-remunerated activities as an Italian National Health Council as Advisor for Ministry of Health (Consiglio Superiore di Sanità), member of the Scientific Council for the patient advocacy association Europa Donna, advisory role at the Fondazione Beretta cancer research foundation, member of the Board of Directors for Lega Italian Lotta ai Tumori (public national company for cancer prevention) and member of the Advisory Council of EUSOMA. SMD has reported personal honoraria from AstraZeneca, BMS and Clovis; fees paid to her institute as coordinating principal investigator for AstraZeneca. DGE has reported fees for advisory board membership for Recursion, SpringWorks and Syantra; consultancy fees for a writing engagement for AstraZeneca. DF has declared no conflicts of interest. NH has reported fees for advisory board membership for Aptitude Health, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz-Hexal, Sanofi and SeaGen; fees as an invited speaker for Art Tempi, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Exact Sciences, Gilead, Lilly, Medscape, MSD, Novartis, Onkowissen, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi and SeaGen; institutional funding from AstraZeneca, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Palleos, Pierre Fabre, Roche, SeaGen, TRIO and WSG; ownership interest in the West German Study Group. She has also reported non-remunerated activities as a member of the AGO Breast Guideline Committee and member of the ESO/ESCO Breast Cancer Educational Programs. She is the Founding Editor of the Breast Care journal. CK has reported fees for advisory board membership for Guerbet; fees as an invited speaker for Bayer and Bracco. BL has reported fees received from the Rising Tide Foundation as a patient reviewer. She has also reported non-remunerated activities as a member of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) ENGAGe (Past Executive Board Member) and chair of KIU—Danish Patient Organisation for Women with Gynaecological Cancer. ELL has reported employment as the Director of the Medical Genetics Institute of the Shaare Zedek Medical Center. She has also reported non-remunerated activity as the vice president of the Israel National Academy of Science in Medicine (non-profit). ML has reported fees for advisory board membership and speaker fees for AstraZeneca, Exact Sciences, Gilead, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche and SeaGen; fees as an invited speaker for Ipsen, Knight, Libbs, Pfizer, Sandoz, SeaGen and Takeda. JAL has reported fees for advisory board membership for Artios Pharma, AstraZeneca, BMS, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, Ellipses, GSK, ImmunoGen, Merck/MSD, Nuvation, Pfizer and VBL Therapeutics; speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, GSK and Neopharm; fees related to an independent data monitoring committee for Regeneron; institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, GSK, MSD/Merck and Pfizer. He has also reported non-remunerated activities as vice president of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (2019-2021). He serves as an associate editor of Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology (Sage Publishing). SL has reported fees paid to her institute for advisory board membership for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, DSI, EirGenix, Gilead, GSK, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Relay Therapeutics, Roche, Sanofi and SeaGen; fees paid to her institute as an invited speaker for AstraZeneca, DSI, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche; employment as the Chief Executive officer (CEO) of GBG Forschungs GmbH; licensing fees paid to her institute by VM Scope GmbH; research grants to her institute from AstraZeneca, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Immunomedics/Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche; institutional funding from AbbVie and Molecular Health; fees paid to her institute as principal investigator (Penelope/Padma) from Pfizer; fees paid to her institute from AstraZeneca (SC Capitello), Daiichi Sankyo (SC Destiny B05), Immunomedics/Gilead (SC ASCENT), Novartis (SC SOLAR1), Pfizer (SC PALOMA3), Roche (SC Inavo and SC Katherine), SeaGen (SC HERCLIMB). She has also reported non-remunerated activities as principal investigator for Aphinity, advisory role to Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Kommission Mamma (group in Germany responsible for breast cancer guidelines), membership of AGO, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft (DKG), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and ESMO including membership of the ESMO Guidelines Committee and past chair of the ESMO Breast Congress. She has reported institutional patents for which she has no financial interests: EP14153692.0, EP21152186.9, EP15702464.7, EP19808852.8. K-AP has reported non-remunerated activities as advisory board member for AstraZeneca, Scientific Advisory Committee member for Breast Cancer Trials, project lead in Australia for the DECRESENDO and OlympiA studies, member of the Expert Advisory Group on Cancer Clusters for the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services, Strategic Advisory Committee member for Breast Cancer Network Australia, Cancer Genetics Reference Committee Member for New South Wales Cancer Institute; advisory role on the register of experts for breast and hereditary cancer for the Medical Oncology Group of Australia and breast cancer optimal care pathway committee member for Cancer Council Victoria. She is also a leadership fellow of the National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) and a practitioner fellow of the National Breast Cancer Foundation (Australia). SP-S has reported fees paid to her institute for advisory board membership for AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Exact Sciences, Medison, Pfizer and Roche; fees paid to her institute as an invited speaker for AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Exact Sciences, Medison, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche; fees paid to her institute for consultancy for Medison; personal and institutional research grant for an request for proposal for independent research put out by Shared Progress in Cancer Care and Pfizer.

Background: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis holds great promise for non-invasive cancer screening, diagnosis, and monitoring. We hypothesized that mining the patterns of cfDNA shallow whole-genome sequencing datasets from patients with cancer could improve cancer detection., Methods: By applying unsupervised clustering and supervised machine learning on large cfDNA shallow whole-genome sequencing datasets from healthy individuals (n = 367) and patients with different hematological (n = 238) and solid malignancies (n = 320), we identified cfDNA signatures that enabled cancer detection and typing., Results: Unsupervised clustering revealed cancer type-specific sub-grouping. Classification using a supervised machine learning model yielded accuracies of 96% and 65% in discriminating hematological and solid malignancies from healthy controls, respectively. The accuracy of disease type prediction was 85% and 70% for the hematological and solid cancers, respectively. The potential utility of managing a specific cancer was demonstrated by classifying benign from invasive and borderline adnexal masses with an area under the curve of 0.87 and 0.74, respectively., Conclusions: This approach provides a generic analytical strategy for non-invasive pan-cancer detection and cancer type prediction., Competing Interests: Authors’ Disclosures or Potential Conflicts of Interest: Upon manuscript submission, all authors completed the author disclosure form. Disclosures and/or potential conflicts of interest:, (© American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2022.)

Objectives: To compare the performance of transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound with that of the first-line staging method (contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT)) and a novel technique, whole-body magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted sequence (WB-DWI/MRI), in the assessment of peritoneal involvement (carcinomatosis), lymph-node staging and prediction of non-resectability in patients with suspected ovarian cancer., Methods: Between March 2016 and October 2017, all consecutive patients with suspicion of ovarian cancer and surgery planned at a gynecological oncology center underwent preoperative staging and prediction of non-resectability with ultrasound, CT and WB-DWI/MRI. The evaluation followed a single, predefined protocol, assessing peritoneal spread at 19 sites and lymph-node metastasis at eight sites. The prediction of non-resectability was based on abdominal markers. Findings were compared to the reference standard (surgical findings and outcome and histopathological evaluation)., Results: Sixty-seven patients with confirmed ovarian cancer were analyzed. Among them, 51 (76%) had advanced-stage and 16 (24%) had early-stage ovarian cancer. Diagnostic laparoscopy only was performed in 16% (11/67) of the cases and laparotomy in 84% (56/67), with no residual disease at the end of surgery in 68% (38/56), residual disease ≤ 1 cm in 16% (9/56) and residual disease > 1 cm in 16% (9/56). Ultrasound and WB-DWI/MRI performed better than did CT in the assessment of overall peritoneal carcinomatosis (area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC), 0.87, 0.86 and 0.77, respectively). Ultrasound was not inferior to CT (P = 0.002). For assessment of retroperitoneal lymph-node staging (AUC, 0.72-0.76) and prediction of non-resectability in the abdomen (AUC, 0.74-0.80), all three methods performed similarly. In general, ultrasound had higher or identical specificity to WB-DWI/MRI and CT at each of the 19 peritoneal sites evaluated, but lower or equal sensitivity in the abdomen. Compared with WB-DWI/MRI and CT, transvaginal ultrasound had higher accuracy (94% vs 91% and 85%, respectively) and sensitivity (94% vs 91% and 89%, respectively) in the detection of carcinomatosis in the pelvis. Better accuracy and sensitivity of ultrasound (93% and 100%) than WB-DWI/MRI (83% and 75%) and CT (84% and 88%) in the evaluation of deep rectosigmoid wall infiltration, in particular, supports the potential role of ultrasound in planning rectosigmoid resection. In contrast, for the bowel serosal and mesenterial assessment, abdominal ultrasound had the lowest accuracy (70%, 78% and 79%, respectively) and sensitivity (42%, 65% and 65%, respectively)., Conclusions: This is the first prospective study to document that, in experienced hands, ultrasound may be an alternative to WB-DWI/MRI and CT in ovarian cancer staging, including peritoneal and lymph-node evaluation and prediction of non-resectability based on abdominal markers of non-resectability. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology., (© 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

Background: Tumors can influence peripheral immune macroenvironment, thereby creating opportunities for non-invasive serum/plasma immunobiomarkers for immunostratification and immunotherapy designing. However, current approaches for immunobiomarkers' detection are largely quantitative, which is unreliable for assessing functional peripheral immunodynamics of patients with cancer. Hence, we aimed to design a functional biomarker modality for capturing peripheral immune signaling in patients with cancer for reliable immunostratification., Methods: We used a data-driven in silico framework, integrating existing tumor/blood bulk-RNAseq or single-cell (sc)RNAseq datasets of patients with cancer, to inform the design of an innovative serum-screening modality, that is, serum-functional immunodynamic status (sFIS) assay. Next, we pursued proof-of-concept analyses via multiparametric serum profiling of patients with ovarian cancer (OV) with sFIS assay combined with Luminex (cytokines/soluble immune checkpoints), CA125-antigen detection, and whole-blood immune cell counts. Here, sFIS assay's ability to determine survival benefit or malignancy risk was validated in a discovery (n=32) and/or validation (n=699) patient cohorts. Lastly, we used an orthotopic murine metastatic OV model, with anti-OV therapy selection via in silico drug-target screening and murine serum screening via sFIS assay, to assess suitable in vivo immunotherapy options., Results: In silico data-driven framework predicted that peripheral immunodynamics of patients with cancer might be best captured via analyzing myeloid nuclear factor kappa-light-chain enhancer of activated B cells (NFκB) signaling and interferon-stimulated genes' (ISG) responses. This helped in conceptualization of an ' in sitro ' ( in vitro + in situ ) sFIS assay, where human myeloid cells were exposed to patients' serum in vitro , to assess serum-induced (si)-NFκB or interferon (IFN)/ISG responses (as active signaling reporter activity) within them, thereby 'mimicking' patients' in situ immunodynamic status. Multiparametric serum profiling of patients with OV established that sFIS assay can: decode peripheral immunology (by indicating higher enrichment of si-NFκB over si-IFN/ISG responses), estimate survival trends (si-NFκB or si-IFN/ISG responses associating with negative or positive prognosis, respectively), and coestimate malignancy risk (relative to benign/borderline ovarian lesions). Biologically, we documented dominance of pro-tumorigenic, myeloid si-NFκB response HIGH si-IFN/ISG response LOW inflammation in periphery of patients with OV. Finally, in an orthotopic murine metastatic OV model, sFIS assay predicted the higher capacity of chemo-immunotherapy (paclitaxel-carboplatin plus anti-TNF antibody combination) in achieving a pro-immunogenic peripheral milieu (si-IFN/ISG response HIGH si-NFκB response LOW ), which aligned with high antitumor efficacy., Conclusions: We established sFIS assay as a novel biomarker resource for serum screening in patients with OV to evaluate peripheral immunodynamics, patient survival trends and malignancy risk, and to design preclinical chemo-immunotherapy strategies., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The sFIS assay is currently the subject of an ongoing PCT patent application. ADG has received consulting/advisory/lecture honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Miltenyi Biotec., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG), the International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) group, and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based statements on the pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors, including imaging techniques, biomarkers, and prediction models. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE nominated a multidisciplinary international group, including expert practising clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors and management of patients with ovarian cancer (19 experts across Europe). A patient representative was also included in the group. To ensure that the statements were evidence-based, the current literature was reviewed and critically appraised. Preliminary statements were drafted based on the review of the relevant literature. During a conference call, the whole group discussed each preliminary statement and a first round of voting was carried out. Statements were removed when a consensus among group members was not obtained. The voters had the opportunity to provide comments/suggestions with their votes. The statements were then revised accordingly. Another round of voting was carried out according to the same rules to allow the whole group to evaluate the revised version of the statements. The group achieved consensus on 18 statements. This Consensus Statement presents these ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE statements on the pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors and the assessment of carcinomatosis, together with a summary of the evidence supporting each statement., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DT: senior investigator FWO (Fund for Scientific Research Flanders), and research sponsored by Roche Diagnostics. KU Leuven has consultancy agreements with GE Healthcare, Samsung Healthcare, GSK, and Canon. TB: research sponsored by Roche Diagnostics, Samsung Medison and Illumina, and grants for traveling from Samsung Medison. LC: advisory boards for AstraZeneca, GSK, Takeda, and Roche. DC: advisory boards for Genmab, AstraZeneca, Roche, and Sotio. NC: advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics, Mersana and eTheRNA Immunotherapies NV, grants for traveling from Roche, Genmab and Amgen, and educational fees from MSD and Medscape Oncology. AdB: advisory boards for Roche, AstraZeneca, GSK/Tesaro, BIOCAD, Clovis, Genmab/Seattle Genetics, Pfizer, and Amgen, and grants for traveling from Roche and AstraZeneca. IV: consulting activities for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Carrick Therapeutics, Debiopharm International SA, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Elevar Therapeutics, F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Genmab, GSK, Immunogen Inc, Medical University of Vienna, Mersana, Millenium Pharmaceuticals, MSD, Novocure, Octimet Oncology NV, Oncoinvent AS, Pharmamar, Sotioa.s, Tesaro Inc, Verastem Oncology, and Zentalis, contracted research (via KU Leuven) from Oncoinvent AS and Genmab, grants (corporate sponsored research) from Amgen and Roche, and accommodations/travel expenses from Amgen, MSD, Tesaro, AstraZeneca, and Roche. CF: advisory boards for Roche, GSK, Tesaro, AZ/MSD, Clovis, Sequana and Ethicon, and grants for traveling from GSK and Roche. FP, CL, DF, WF, GG, BL, AL, LM, PM, DQ, ACT, VV and GS: no conflicts of interest., (© IGCS and ESGO 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.)

In centers with access to high-end ultrasound machines and expert sonologists, ultrasound is used to detect metastases in regional lymph nodes from melanoma, breast cancer and vulvar cancer. There is, as yet, no international consensus on ultrasound assessment of lymph nodes in any disease or medical condition. The lack of standardized ultrasound nomenclature to describe lymph nodes makes it difficult to compare results from different ultrasound studies and to find reliable ultrasound features for distinguishing non-infiltrated lymph nodes from lymph nodes infiltrated by cancer or lymphoma cells. The Vulvar International Tumor Analysis (VITA) collaborative group consists of gynecologists, gynecologic oncologists and radiologists with expertise in gynecologic cancer, particularly in the ultrasound staging and treatment of vulvar cancer. The work herein is a consensus opinion on terms, definitions and measurements which may be used to describe inguinal lymph nodes on grayscale and color/power Doppler ultrasound. The proposed nomenclature need not be limited to the description of inguinal lymph nodes as part of vulvar cancer staging; it can be used to describe peripheral lymph nodes in general, as well as non-peripheral (i.e. parietal or visceral) lymph nodes if these can be visualized clearly. The association between the ultrasound features described here and histopathological diagnosis has not yet been established. VITA terms and definitions lay the foundations for prospective studies aiming to identify ultrasound features typical of metastases and other pathology in lymph nodes and studies to elucidate the role of ultrasound in staging of vulvar and other malignancies. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology., (© 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG), the International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) group and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based statements on the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumours, including imaging techniques, biomarkers and prediction models. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE nominated a multidisciplinary international group, including expert practising clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumours and management of patients with ovarian cancer (19 experts across Europe). A patient representative was also included in the group. To ensure that the statements were evidence-based, the current literature was reviewed and critically appraised. Preliminary statements were drafted based on the review of the relevant literature. During a conference call, the whole group discussed each preliminary statement and a first round of voting was carried out. Statements were removed when a consensus among group members was not obtained. The voters had the opportunity to provide comments/suggestions with their votes. The statements were then revised accordingly. Another round of voting was carried out according to the same rules to allow the whole group to evaluate the revised version of the statements. The group achieved consensus on 18 statements. This Consensus Statement presents these ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE statements on the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumours and the assessment of carcinomatosis, together with a summary of the evidence supporting each statement., Competing Interests: D.T.: senior investigator for FWO (Fund for Scientific Research Flanders) and research sponsored by Roche Diagnostics. KU Leuven has consultancy agreements with GE Healthcare, Samsung Healthcare, GSK and Canon. T.B.: research sponsored by Roche Diagnostics, Samsung Medison and Illumina, and grants for traveling from Samsung Medison. L.C.: advisory boards for AstraZeneca, GSK, Takeda and Roche. D.C.: advisory boards for Genmab, AstraZeneca, Roche and Sotio. N.C.: advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics, Mersana and eTheRNA Immunotherapies NV, grants for traveling from Roche, Genmab and Amgen, and educational fees from MSD and Medscape Oncology. A.d.B.: advisory boards for Roche, AstraZeneca, GSK/Tesaro, BIOCAD, Clovis, Genmab/ Seattle Genetics, Pfizer and Amgen, and grants for traveling from Roche and AstraZeneca. I.V.: consulting activities for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Carrick Therapeutics, Debiopharm International SA, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Elevar Therapeutics, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Genmab, GSK, Immunogen Inc, Medical University of Vienna, Mersana, Millenium Pharmaceuticals, MSD, Novocure, Octimet Oncology NV, Oncoinvent AS, Pharmamar, Sotio a.s. Prague, Tesaro Inc, Verastem Oncology and Zentalis, contracted research (via KU Leuven) from Oncoinvent AS and Genmab, grants (corporate sponsored research) from Amgen and Roche, and accommodation/travel expenses from Amgen, MSD, Tesaro, AstraZeneca and Roche. C.F.: advisory boards for Roche, GSK, Tesaro, AZ/MSD, Clovis, Sequana and Ethicon, and grants for traveling from GSK and Roche. F.P., C.L., D.F., W.F., G.G., B.L., A.L., L.M., P.M., D.Q., A.T., V.V. and G.S. report no conflicts of interest.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of 4D Power Doppler tissue evaluation to discriminate between normal ovaries and ovarian cancer tumors. This was a prospective observational study. Twenty-three cases of surgically confirmed ovarian High Grade Serous Carcinoma (HGSC) were analyzed. The control group consisted of 23 healthy patients, each matching their study-group counterpart age wise (±3 years) and according to their menopausal status. Transvaginal Doppler 4D ultrasound scans were done on every patient and analyzed with 3D/4D software. Two 4D indices-volumetric Systolic/Diastolic Index (vS/D) and volumetric Pulsatility Index (vPI)-were calculated. To keep results standardized and due to technical limitations, virtual 1cc spherical tissue samples taken from the part with highest vascularization as detected by bi-directional Power Doppler were analyzed for both groups of ovaries. Values of volumetric S/D indices and volumetric PI indices were statistically lower in ovarian malignant tumors compared to normal ovaries: 1.096 vs. 1.794 and 0.092 vs. 0.558, respectively ( p < 0.001). The 4D bi-directional Power Doppler vascular indices were statistically different between malignant tumors and normal ovaries. These findings could support the rationale for future studies for assessing this technology to discriminate between malignant and benign tumors.

Purpose: We aimed to compare the learning curves of an ultrasound trainee (obstetrics and gynecology resident) and a radiology trainee when assessing pelvic endometriosis., Methods: Consecutive patients with suspected endometriosis were prospectively enrolled in a tertiary center. They underwent an ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging preoperatively, which was reported according to the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group consensus. Trainees reported on deep endometriosis (DE), endometriomas, frozen pelvis, and adenomyosis. Using the Kappa agreement, their findings were compared against laparoscopy/histology and expert findings. The learning curve was considered positive when performance improved over time and indeterminate in all other cases., Results: Reports from thirty-five women were divided chronologically into 3 equal blocks to assess the learning curve. For ultrasound, trainee versus expert showed a positive learning curve in overall pelvic DE assessment. There was an excellent agreement for adenomyosis (Kappa = 1.00, p = 0.09), frozen pelvis (Kappa = 0.90, p = 0.01), bowel (Kappa = 1.00, p = 0.01), and bladder DE assessment (Kappa = 1.00, p = 0.01). Endometrioma and uterosacral ligament assessment showed an indeterminate curve. For radiology, trainee versus expert showed a positive curve when detecting adenomyosis (Kappa = 0.42, p = 0.09) and bladder DE (Kappa = 1.00, p = 0.01). The assessment of endometriomas, frozen pelvis, overall pelvic DE, bowel, and uterosacral ligament DE showed indeterminate curve. Agreement between trainees and laparoscopy/histology showed a positive curve for bladder (both) and frozen pelvis (ultrasound only)., Conclusion: A positive learning curve can be seen in some areas of pelvic endometriosis mapping after as little as 35 cases, but a bigger caseload is required to demonstrate the curve in full. The ultrasound trainee had positive learning curves in more anatomical locations (bladder, adenomyosis, overall bowel DE, frozen pelvis) than the radiology trainee (bladder, adenomyosis), which could be down to individual factors, differences in training, or the imaging method itself., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 T. Indrielle-Kelly et al.)

Background: SENTIX (ENGOT-CX2/CEEGOG-CX1) is an international, multicentre, prospective observational trial evaluating sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy without pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. We report the final preplanned analysis of the secondary end-points: SLN mapping and outcomes of intraoperative SLN pathology., Methods: Forty-seven sites (18 countries) with experience of SLN biopsy participated in SENTIX. We preregistered patients with stage IA1/lymphovascular space invasion-positive to IB2 (4 cm or smaller or 2 cm or smaller for fertility-sparing treatment) cervical cancer without suspicious lymph nodes on imaging before surgery. SLN frozen section assessment and pathological ultrastaging were mandatory. Patients were registered postoperatively if SLN were bilaterally detected in the pelvis, and frozen sections were negative., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02494063)., Results: We analysed data for 395 preregistered patients. Bilateral detection was achieved in 91% (355/395), and it was unaffected by tumour size, tumour stage or body mass index, but it was lower in older patients, in patients who underwent open surgery, and in sites with fewer cases. No SLN were found outside the seven anatomical pelvic regions. Most SLN and positive SLN were localised below the common iliac artery bifurcation. Single positive SLN above the iliac bifurcation were found in 2% of cases. Frozen sections failed to detect 54% of positive lymph nodes (pN1), including 28% of cases with macrometastases and 90% with micrometastases., Interpretation: SLN biopsy can achieve high bilateral SLN detection in patients with tumours of 4 cm or smaller. At experienced centres, all SLN were found in the pelvis, and most were located below the iliac vessel bifurcation. SLN frozen section assessment is an unreliable tool for intraoperative triage because it only detects about half of N1 cases., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The data on the prognostic significance of low volume metastases in lymph nodes (LN) are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the outcome of a large group of patients treated with sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy at a single referral center. Patients with cervical cancer, stage T1a-T2b, common tumor types, negative LN on preoperative staging, treated by primary surgery between 01/2007 and 12/2016, with at least unilateral SLN detection were included. Patients with abandoned radical surgery due to intraoperative SLN positivity detected by frozen section were excluded. All SLNs were postoperatively processed by an intensive protocol for pathological ultrastaging. Altogether, 226 patients were analyzed. Positive LN were detected in 38 (17%) cases; macrometastases (MAC), micrometastases (MIC), isolated tumor cells (ITC) in 14, 16, and 8 patients. With the median follow-up of 65 months, 22 recurrences occurred. Disease-free survival (DFS) reached 90% in the whole group, 93% in LN-negative cases, 89% in cases with MAC, 69% with MIC, and 87% with ITC. The presence of MIC in SLN was associated with significantly decreased DFS and OS. Patients with MIC and MAC should be managed similarly, and SLN ultrastaging should become an integral part of the management of patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

Background: Optimizing and ensuring the quality of surgical care is essential to improve the management and outcome of patients with cervical cancer.To develop a list of quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer that can be used to audit and improve clinical practice., Methods: Quality indicators were developed using a four-step evaluation process that included a systematic literature search to identify potential quality indicators, in-person meetings of an ad hoc group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large panel of European clinicians and patient representatives., Results: Fifteen structural, process, and outcome indicators were selected. Using a structured format, each quality indicator has a description specifying what the indicator is measuring. Measurability specifications are also detailed to define how the indicator will be measured in practice. Each indicator has a target which gives practitioners and health administrators a quantitative basis for improving care and organizational processes., Discussion: Implementation of institutional quality assurance programs can improve quality of care, even in high-volume centers. This set of quality indicators from the European Society of Gynaecological Cancer may be a major instrument to improve the quality of surgical treatment of cervical cancer., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DC has reported advisory roles for AstraZeneca, Roche, and Sotio; FR has reported activities for Roche, AstraZeneca, and Tesaro; IV has reported advisory boards for Advaxis, Inc, Eisai Inc, MSD Belgium, Roche NV, Genmab, F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, PharmaMar, Millenium Pharmaceuticals, Clovis Oncology Inc, AstraZeneca NV, Tesaro, Oncoinvent AS, Immunogen Inc, Sotio, contracted research (via KU Leuven) with Oncoinvent AS, Genmab, research grants from Amgen, Roche, Stichting tegen Kanker, accommodations and/or travel expenses from Takeda Oncology, PharmaMar, Genmab, Roche, AstraZeneca and Tesaro; DF, CF, CK, FL, PM, RN, FP, JP, DQ, AR, KT, CT, PW, and AGZE have reported no conflicts of interest., (© IGCS and ESGO 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.)

The aim of this study was to describe the clinical and sonographic features of ovarian metastases originating from colorectal cancer (mCRC), and to discriminate mCRC from primary ovarian cancer (OC). We conducted a multi-institutional, retrospective study of consecutive patients with ovarian mCRC who had undergone ultrasound examination using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) terminology, with the addition of evaluating signs of necrosis and abdominal staging. A control group included patients with primary OC. Clinical and ultrasound data, subjective assessment (SA), and an assessment of different neoplasias in the adnexa (ADNEX) model were evaluated. Fisher's exact and Student's t -tests, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), and classification and regression trees (CART) were used to conduct statistical analyses. In total, 162 patients (81 with OC and 81 with ovarian mCRC) were included. None of the patients with OC had undergone chemotherapy for CRC in the past, compared with 40% of patients with ovarian mCRC ( p < 0.001). The ovarian mCRC tumors were significantly larger, a necrosis sign was more frequently present, and tumors had an irregular wall or were fixed less frequently; ascites, omental cake, and carcinomatosis were less common in mCRC than in primary OC. In a subgroup of patients with ovarian mCRC who had not undergone treatment for CRC in anamnesis, tumors were larger, and had fewer papillations and more locules compared with primary OC. The highest AUC for the discrimination of ovarian mCRC from primary OC was for CART (0.768), followed by SA (0.735) and ADNEX calculated with CA-125 (0.680). Ovarian mCRC and primary OC can be distinguished based on patient anamnesis, ultrasound pattern recognition, a proposed decision tree model, and an ADNEX model with CA-125 levels., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Purpose of Review: For uterine cervical cancer, the recently revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system (2018) incorporates imaging and pathology assessments in its staging. In this review we summarize the reported staging performances of conventional and novel imaging methods and provide an overview of promising novel imaging methods relevant for cervical cancer patient care., Recent Findings: Diagnostic imaging during the primary diagnostic work-up is recommended to better assess tumor extent and metastatic disease and is now reflected in the 2018 FIGO stages 3C1 and 3C2 (positive pelvic and/or paraaortic lymph nodes). For pretreatment local staging, imaging by transvaginal or transrectal ultrasound (TVS, TRS) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is instrumental to define pelvic tumor extent, including a more accurate assessment of tumor size, stromal invasion depth, and parametrial invasion. In locally advanced cervical cancer, positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) or computed tomography (CT) is recommended, since the identification of metastatic lymph nodes and distant metastases has therapeutic consequences. Furthermore, novel imaging techniques offer visualization of microstructural and functional tumor characteristics, reportedly linked to clinical phenotype, thus with a potential for further improving risk stratification and individualization of treatment. Diagnostic imaging by MRI/TVS/TRS and PET-CT/CT is instrumental for pretreatment staging in uterine cervical cancer and guides optimal treatment strategy. Novel imaging techniques may also provide functional biomarkers with potential relevance for developing more targeted treatment strategies in cervical cancer.

Objective: To describe the sonographic characteristics of a lymphocele after pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy for gynecological malignancy, analyze and identify ultrasound characteristics related to the symptomatic and asymptomatic lymphoceles., Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of ultrasound examination data collected consecutively in patients after pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy in one institution. We recorded the number of lymphoceles, localization, size; ultrasound morphology following International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group classification and symptoms., Results: We described and analyzed 227 lymphoceles (150 asymptomatic and 77 symptomatic) in 161 patients. The asymptomatic lymphocele is typically a thick-walled cystic lesion without vascularization, round and unilocular with anechoic or ground-glass content. The symptomatic lymphocele is typically an oval, or ovoid, unilocular lesion with low-level or anechoic content (ground glass content is unlikely to be present, p < 0.001) and the presence of debris and septations. The lymphocele size (p = 0.001), number of lymphoceles (>1) (p = 0.005), septa (p = 0.002), and debris (p < 0.001) were independent ultrasound features correlating to symptoms development. More than one lymphocele (p = 0.047), septations (p = 0.007) and presence of debris (p < 0.001) were independent ultrasound features correlated to infection., Conclusion: Ultrasound features of symptomatic and asymptomatic lymphocele differ. The clues for lymphocele differential diagnosis are the history of lymphadenectomy and the finding cystic lesion with typically ultrasound features of lymphocele, adjacent to great pelvic vessels. Unique ultrasound features of lymphocele may help to distinguish from tumor relapse, hematoma, abscess, seroma or urinoma., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objectives: To describe sonographic features of the microcystic elongated and fragmented (MELF) pattern of myometrial invasion (MI) using the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) criteria; to assess the effect of the MELF pattern on preoperative ultrasound evaluation of MI; and to determine the relationship of the MELF pattern to more advanced stage (≥ IB) and lymph node metastases in women with endometrioid endometrial cancer., Methods/materials: We included 850 women with endometrioid endometrial cancer from the prospective IETA 4 study. Ultrasound experts performed all ultrasound examinations, according to the IETA protocol. Reference pathologists assessed the presence or absence of the MELF pattern. Sonographic features and accuracy of ultrasound assessment of MI were compared in cases with the presence and the absence of the MELF pattern. The MELF pattern was correlated to more advanced stage (≥IB) and lymph node metastases., Results: The MELF pattern was present in 197 (23.2%) women. On preoperative ultrasound imaging the endometrium was thicker (p = 0.031), more richly vascularized (p = 0.003) with the multiple multifocal vessel pattern (p < 0.001) and the assessment of adenomyosis was more often uncertain (p < 0.001). The presence or the absence of the MELF pattern did not affect the accuracy of the assessment of MI. The MELF pattern was associated with deep myometrial invasion (≥ 50%) (p < 0.001), cervical stromal invasion (p = 0.037), more advanced stage (≥ IB) (p < 0.001) and lymph node metastases (p = 0.011)., Conclusions: Tumors with the MELF pattern were slightly larger, more richly vascularized with multiple multifocal vessels and assessment of adenomyosis was more uncertain on ultrasound imaging. The MELF pattern did not increase the risk of underestimating MI in preoperative ultrasound staging. Tumors with the MELF pattern were more than twice as likely to have more advanced stage (≥ IB) and lymph node metastases., (© IGCS and ESGO 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)