251. Work, support and solitude: prisoners’ desistance expectations and self-regulating strategies
- Author
-
Emma Villman, Institute of Criminology and Legal Policy, and University of Helsinki, Institute of Criminology and Legal Policy
- Subjects
reintegration ,media_common.quotation_subject ,050901 criminology ,05 social sciences ,Rehabilitation ,Work support ,Solitude ,low-security ,Plan (drawing) ,Criminology ,16. Peace & justice ,5141 Sociology ,prerelease expectations ,open prison ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,0509 other social sciences ,Psychology ,Law ,desistance ,050104 developmental & child psychology ,media_common - Abstract
This article explores how prisoners plan to achieve desistance from crime. In many respects, prisoners have poor prospects upon their release. A prisoner’s chances of reintegration can be hindered by conditions such as structural barriers, lack of social support, and the after-effects of imprisonment. Using qualitative interviews with prisoners (N=45) who were serving at open low-security prisons in Finland, this analysis demonstrates that the majority of the prisoners had optimistic expectations and devised concrete plans for desistance. To achieve this desired change, the prisoners intended to use three self-regulating strategies; to secure employment or another daily routine, to seek help from others, and to shift surroundings. Even if work, support, and solitude are viable strategies for achieving desistance from crime, this article recognizes the risk of these self-regulating strategies failing due to inherent uncertainties and weak implementation intentions. This article explores how prisoners plan to achieve desistance from crime. In many respects, prisoners have poor prospects upon their release. A prisoner’s chances of reintegration can be hindered by conditions such as structural barriers, lack of social support, and the after-effects of imprisonment. Using qualitative interviews with prisoners (N = 45) who were serving at open low-security prisons in Finland, this analysis demonstrates that the majority of the prisoners had optimistic expectations and devised concrete plans for desistance. To achieve this desired change, the prisoners intended to use three self-regulating strategies; to secure employment or another daily routine, to seek help from others, and to shift surroundings. Even if work, support, and solitude are viable strategies for achieving desistance from crime, this article recognizes the risk of these self-regulating strategies failing due to inherent uncertainties and weak implementation intentions.
- Published
- 2021