Nautsch, Andreas, Jiménez, Abelino, Treiber, Amos, Kolberg, Jascha, Jasserand, Catherine, Kindt, Els, Delgado, Héctor, Todisco, Massimiliano, Hmani, Mohamed Amine, Mtibaa, Aymen, Abdelraheem, Mohammed Ahmed, Abad, Alberto, Teixeira, Francisco, Matrouf, Driss, Gomez-Barrero, Marta, Petrovska-Delacrétaz, Dijana, Chollet, Gérard, Evans, Nicholas, Schneider, Thomas, Bonastre, Jean-François, Raj, Bhiksha, Trancoso, Isabel, Busch, Christoph, Eurecom [Sophia Antipolis], Hochschule Darmstadt, Carnegie Mellon University [Pittsburgh] (CMU), Technische Universität Darmstadt (TU Darmstadt), University of Groningen [Groningen], Catholic University of Leuven - Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven), ARMEDIA (ARMEDIA-SAMOVAR), Services répartis, Architectures, MOdélisation, Validation, Administration des Réseaux (SAMOVAR), Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT)-Télécom SudParis (TSP)-Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT)-Télécom SudParis (TSP), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Département Electronique et Physique (EPH), Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT)-Télécom SudParis (TSP), Institut Polytechnique de Paris (IP Paris), Intelligent Voice Ltd, Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores Investigação e Desenvolvimento em Lisboa (INESC-ID), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (IST)-Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores (INESC), Laboratoire Informatique d'Avignon (LIA), Centre d'Enseignement et de Recherche en Informatique - CERI-Avignon Université (AU), Language Technologies Institute [Pittsburgh] (LTI), and Transboundary Legal Studies
Speech recordings are a rich source of personal, sensitive data that can be used to support a plethora of diverse applications, from health profiling to biometric recognition. It is therefore essential that speech recordings are adequately protected so that they cannot be misused. Such protection, in the form of privacy-preserving technologies, is required to ensure that: (i) the biometric profiles of a given individual (e.g., across different biometric service operators) are unlinkable; (ii) leaked, encrypted biometric information is irreversible, and that (iii) biometric references are renewable. Whereas many privacy-preserving technologies have been developed for other biometric characteristics, very few solutions have been proposed to protect privacy in the case of speech signals. Despite privacy preservation this is now being mandated by recent European and international data protection regulations. With the aim of fostering progress and collaboration between researchers in the speech, biometrics and applied cryptography communities, this survey article provides an introduction to the field, starting with a legal perspective on privacy preservation in the case of speech data. It then establishes the requirements for effective privacy preservation, reviews generic cryptography-based solutions, followed by specific techniques that are applicable to speaker characterisation (biometric applications) and speech characterisation (non-biometric applications). Glancing at non-biometrics, methods are presented to avoid function creep, preventing the exploitation of biometric information, e.g., to single out an identity in speech-assisted health care via speaker characterisation. In promoting harmonised research, the article also outlines common, empirical evaluation metrics for the assessment of privacy-preserving technologies for speech data.