Search

Macitentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist used in pulmonary arterial hypertension, induces cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A at supratherapeutic concentrations in vitro. Most combined oral hormonal contraceptives (OCs) are CYP3A substrates and their efficacy can be affected by CYP3A inducers. This randomized crossover study assessed possible pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between macitentan and an OC containing ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone (or norethisterone). Twenty-six healthy women received a single oral dose of OC alone (reference) and concomitantly with 10 mg macitentan at steady state (test). No PK interaction was concluded if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of geometric mean ratios (GMRs; test/reference) of the peak plasma concentration (Cmax ) and the exposure from 0 to infinity (AUC0 - ∞ ) to the OC components were within the equivalence limits of 0.8 to 1.25. Cmax and AUC0-∞ of the OC were within the equivalence limits. For ethinyl estradiol, GMRs (90%CIs) of Cmax and AUC0-∞ were 0.92 (0.85-0.99) and 0.95 (0.90-0.99). For norethindrone, these values were 1.02 (0.95-1.09) and 1.04 (0.98-1.09), respectively. Overall, study treatments were well tolerated. No major changes from baseline in safety parameters were reported in either treatment. Macitentan does not affect the PK of OCs.

Background Steroid pre-treatments may be useful to program GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles. This prospective study assessed hormonal and ultrasound data collected during the free period after the discontinuation of three different pre-treatments to provide information on the optimal time interval required before starting stimulation. Methods Women were randomized to receive oral contraceptive pill (OCP) [ethinyl estradiol (E(2)) 30 microg + desogestrel 150 microg] (n = 21) or norethisterone 10 mg/day (n = 23) or 17-betaE(2) 4 mg/day (n = 25) or no pre-treatment (n = 24) for one cycle before IVF. Assessments were performed on post-treatment day (PD) 1, 3 and 5, or on spontaneous cycle day (CD) 1 and 3. Results After OCP and progestogen administration, FSH and LH concentrations shifted from strongly suppressed PD1 levels to PD5 values similar to those observed on CD1. Meanwhile, follicle sizes remained small up to PD5. In contrast, estrogen pre-treatment poorly reduced FSH levels on PD1 compared with OCP or progestogen. Consequently, follicle size was more heterogeneous. FSH rebound was maximal on PD3, whereas LH levels were slightly increased up to PD5. Conclusions A 5-day free interval after OCP or progestogen offers the advantages of gonadotrophin recovery and homogeneous follicular cohort, whereas early FSH rebound occurring after estrogen pre-treatment argues for a short free period.

In healthy postmenopausal women, E(2) plus norethisterone acetate (1 mg + 0.5 mg) or tibolone (2.5 mg) similarly modify flow-mediated endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. The effect is dependent on baseline vasodilator reserve, with low values being augmented by either treatment.

Tibolone is used for the treatment of climacteric symptoms in postmenopausal women. It is metabolised in a tissue-specific manner so that while some metabolites exert estrogenic effects on bone and the CNS, others are thought to protect the breast and endometrium from estrogenic stimulation. Tibolone is a 7alpha-methyl derivative of 19-norethynodrel. Since the introduction of synthetic progestagens for therapeutic use there has been considerable controversy as to whether they can undergo aromatisation to give rise to the potent estrogen, ethinylestradiol. In this study, we examined whether the delta-4-ene (7alpha-methyl norethisterone) metabolite of tibolone, which has a similar delta-4-ene A-ring structure to that of the estrone precursor, androstenedione, could undergo aromatisation to the potent estrogen, 7alpha-methyl ethinylestradiol. For these studies, JEG-3 choriocarcinoma cells were employed as they have a very high level of aromatase activity. TLC and HPLC procedures were developed to separate phenolic from non-phenolic compounds and were initially used to confirm that JEG-3 cells readily aromatised androstenedione to estrogens (up to 74%). The aromatisation of androstenedione to estrogens by these cells could be completely blocked with the potent aromatase inhibitor letrozole. When [(3)H] 7alpha-methyl norethisterone was incubated with JEG-3 cells no evidence for its conversion to [(3)H] 7alpha-ethinylestradiol was obtained. Radioactivity detected on the TLC plate or HPLC fractions where standard 7alpha-methyl ethinylestradiol was located, revealed that similar levels were present when 7alpha-methyl norethisterone was incubated with culture medium alone or with JEG-3 cells in the absence or presence of letrozole. From these investigations, it is concluded that 7alpha-methyl norethisterone does not undergo aromatisation to an estrogenic derivative.

Nandrolone and other 19-norsteroid potent anabolic steroids have been prohibited in sports for 30 years. The detection of the main urinary metabolite--19-norandrosterone--in amounts greater than 2 ng/ml constitutes an adverse analytical finding. The presence in nutritional sport supplements of steroids not listed on the label has undoubtedly resulted in positive tests, but inadvertent consumption of meat containing residues of hormonal treatment should not realistically cause apprehension. Although highly improbable, athletes should prudently avoid meals composed of pig offal in the hours preceding the test since the consumption of edible parts of a non-castrated pig, containing 19-nortestosterone, has been shown to results in the excretion of 19-norandrosterone in the following hours. Norsteroid metabolites are formed during pregnancy and excreted as minor metabolites of norethisterone, and minute amounts have been identified in some male and female samples when using more sensitive techniques of detection. Whereas exercise does not seem to be a significant factor in 19-norandrosterone excretion, some rare urine samples were found to be a suitable medium for in situ 19-demethylation of urinary metabolites.

Objective— To compare the effects of intranasal and oral administration of 17β-estradiol (E 2 ) and norethisterone(acetate) [NET(A)] in healthy postmenopausal women on activated protein C (APC) resistance and other hemostatic parameters associated with venous thrombosis. Methods and Results— In this 2-center, randomized, double-blind, 1-year trial, 90 postmenopausal women (56.6±4.7 years of age) received daily either an intranasal spray with 175 μg/275 μg E 2 /NET (n=47) or 1 mg/0.5 mg oral E 2 /NETA (n=43). Normalized APC sensitivity ratios (nAPCsr) were determined with a thrombin generation-based APC resistance test. After 1 year, the increase in nAPCsr was smaller in the intranasal than in the oral group: 11% (95% CI, 1% to 22%) versus 53% (95% CI, 37% to 72%). Overall, the decrease in antithrombin and increase in prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) were smaller and the decrease in free protein S larger in the intranasal compared with the oral group after 1 year. In both groups, the decreases in protein C and prothrombin, and the increase in d -dimer were similar. Conclusion— Compared with oral E 2 /NETA therapy, intranasal administration of E 2 /NET had less effect on APC resistance and on a number of other parameters associated with venous thrombosis. This observation suggests the possibility of a lower venous thrombosis risk for intranasal E 2 /NET compared with oral therapy.

We assessed attitudes towards and acceptability of male hormonal contraception among volunteers participating in a clinical trial of a prototype regimen consisting of progestin and testosterone injections. After completing screening eligible men were randomly assigned to the no-treatment group (n = 40) or to receive injections of norethisterone enanthate and testosterone undecanoate or placebo at different intervals (n = 50) according to a blocked randomization list. They underwent self-administered questionnaires. The average age of the participants was approximately 28 years; most were involved in a stable relationship and had no children. Ninety-two percentage of the respondents thought that men and women should share responsibility for contraception and 75% said they would try a hormonal contraceptive if available. At the end of the treatment phase 66% of the participants said that they would use such a method and most rated its acceptability very highly; none reported it to be unacceptable. The injections themselves were indicated as the biggest disadvantage. No significant changes in sexual function or mood states were detected among the men who underwent hormone injections. The contraceptive tested in this study was well accepted by the participants over the course of 1 year. (authors)

The low-temperature inelastic incoherent neutron scattering spectrum of norethisterone was compared with that calculated by the density functional theory method. The quantum chemical calculations permitted proposing the assignment of the vibrational modes. In particular, the dynamics of the methyl group substituted at C(13) of the steroid skeleton was analysed on the basis of the neutron scattering spectra and temperature dependence of the spin-lattice relaxation time (1H NMR).

Working in the early 1950s with Syntex S.A. in Mexico City, Carl Djerassi with colleagues first synthesized 19nor-17a-ethynyltestosterone (VIII in the figure), which came to be known as norethindrone or norethisterone. This steroid, derived from a wild and inedible yam of the genus Dioscorea, proved to be the most effective orally administered progestational agent discovered to that time. After demonstration of the effectiveness of this compound as an oral contraceptive in rabbits, the first clinical trials were conducted by the endocrinologist Gregory Goodwin Pincus (1903-1967) of the Worcester Foundation, Shrewsbury, Mass, and the gynecologist John Rock (1890-1984) of Harvard University. The subsequent use and misuse of ‘‘the Pill,’’ its societal effects, and politics and public-policy consequences have been described in a flood of articles and books. Without question, Djerassi’s first synthesis of an oral contraceptive has played a critical role in the reproductive revolution of the later half of the 20th century. Djerassi, born in Vienna, Austria, obtained his doctorate in chemistry at the University of Wisconsin. After his seminal work with Syntex, Djerassi moved to Stanford University as Professor of Chemistry. Later, he embarked on a career as social historian, novelist, playwright, and poet. Amember of the National Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Djerassi was honored with the National Medal of Science (1973), the National Medal of Technology (1991), and numerous other awards, including 20 honorary doctorates.

Objective Mitogenic growth factors from stromal breast tissue and estrogens are important in growth regulation of breast cells and may modify different responses dependent on the choice of progestogens. The effects of the acknowledged pharmacologically significantly different progestogens, progesterone, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), and norethisterone, were investigated in breast cells treated with growth factor and/or estradiol, comparing normal and primary cancer cells for the first time. Design MCF10A (human epithelial, estrogen-receptor-negative and progesterone-receptor-negative normal breast cells) were incubated with progestogens at 1 microM and 100 nM for 7 days and epidermal growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and insulin-like growth factor at 1 pM. HCC1500 (human estrogen-receptor-positive and progesterone-receptor-positive primary breast cancer cells) were incubated in the same way with growth factors and/or estradiol at 100 pM. Cell proliferation rate was measured by the ATP assay, whereas cell death was measured by photometric enzyme immunoassay. Ratios of cell death to proliferation were calculated from these results. Results In combination with growth factors, MPA reduced the ratio in favor of a proliferative effect in MCF10A cells, followed by norethisterone. Progesterone had no significant effect on the growth factor response. In HCC1500 cells, MPA with growth factors increased the ratio favoring inhibition, norethisterone had a proliferative effect, and progesterone had no significant effect. In combination with estradiol, MPA increased the ratio to inhibition to the greatest extent, followed by norethisterone and progesterone at 1 muM. In combination with growth factors and estradiol, MPA and norethisterone both showed an inhibitory effect, whereas progesterone had no significant effect. Conclusion Certain progestogens are able to induce the proliferation of benign or malignant human breast cells independently of the effects of growth factors and estradiol. Therefore, the choice of progestogen may be important in terms of influencing a possible breast cancer risk.

Uremia induces a suppression of the immune status. A large clinical literature suggests that estradiol (E-2) plays a critical role in immune function. A large proportion of women hemodialysis patients faced early menopause and inadequate estrogen levels. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of hormone replacement therapy on immune function in terms of CD4(+) numbers (inducer/helper T cells), CD8(+) numbers (cytotoxic/ suppressor T cells), CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio, and IgG, IgM, IgA levels in woman hemodialysis patients. In our study, 15 female hemodialysis patients (median age 32.6 range 24-45) were treated with triphasic estrogen/progesterone preparation (estradiol 2 mg for 10 days, and afterwards estradiol 2 mg+norethisterone 1 mg for another 10 days, and at the end estradiol 1 mg for 6 days) for 6 months. CD4(+) numbers, CD8(+) numbers, and IgG, IgA, and IgM levels were determined before and after HRT. The "paired-samples T" test was used for statistical analysis of pretreatment and posttreatment values. A significant increase was observed for CD4(+) numbers (582 +/- 435 versus 637 +/- 445, p=0.04) and CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio (1.4 +/- 0.16 to 2.4 +/- 0.3, p

Some novel steroidal arylidene derivatives were synthesized and representative examples were tested for their antiestrogenic activity. The active compounds were subjected for antitumor activity screening. The compounds tested displayed aromatase inhibitory activity as shown by decrease in estradiol and increase in testosterone levels. Further, some compounds were tested for androgenic/anabolic activity. The steroids used for preparation of these arylidene derivatives are the clinically applied: levo-Norgestrel, Testosterone, Mesterolone and Norethisterone.

Aims Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has been previously reported to modulate vascular function and cardiovascular risk. Its impact on the macrocirculation has previously been explored, however, little data is available on its impact on the microcirculation. This study aimed to determine the impact of HRT on microvascular function in healthy and Type 2 diabetic postmenopausal women (n = 20 and 17, respectively).Methods Microvascular function was assessed by skin maximum hyperaemia, skin hyperaemic response to iontophoretically applied acetylcholine (endothelial-dependent vasodilator) and sodium nitroprusside (endothelial-independent vasodilator), capillary pressure and the microvascular filtration capacity. Microvascular assessments were carried out at baseline and repeated following 6 months' oral hormone replacement therapy (1 mg oestradiol/0.5 mg norethisterone or 1 mg unopposed oestradiol for hysterectomized women).Results Following 6 months' therapy there were no significant changes in microvascular assessments in the healthy women. In the diabetic women there was a reduction in the skin hyperaemic response to acetylcholine [median pretreatment peak response: 1.95 (25th, 75th centiles: 1.54, 2.30) V vs. post-treatment peak response: 1.53 (1.30, 1.91) V (P = 0.011, Wilcoxon's signed rank test)] and sodium nitroprusside [median peak response 1.59 (1.37, 1.99) vs. 1.35 (0.92, 1.63) V (P = 0.011)] with HRT, but no other changes.Conclusion These data suggests that HRT does not affect microvascular function in healthy women, but adversely affects it in diabetic women. These findings may help to explain why HRT fails to provide the predicted cardiovascular protection, and raises the possibility that HRT influences microangiopathy progression in diabetic women.

The goal of this study was to find the most favorable injection interval of norethisterone enanthate (NETE) plus testosterone undecanoate (TU) in terms of gonadotropin, sperm suppression, and prostatic effects. Fifty normal men were randomly assigned to receive NETE 200 mg plus TU 1000 mg every 8 wk (n = 10), every 12 wk (n = 10), every 6 wk for 12 wk and then every 12 wk (n = 10), and every 6 wk for 12 wk and thereafter TU 1000 mg plus placebo every 12 wk (n = 10), and placebo plus placebo every 6 wk for 12 wk and then every 12 wk (n = 10) for 48 wk. Semen analyses, blood drawings, physical examinations, and prostate ultrasounds were performed throughout the study. Of the men in the 8-wk injection group, 90% (nine of 10) achieved azoospermia, compared with 37.5% (three of eight) in the 12-wk injection group (P = 0.019). TU plus placebo injected every 12 wk did not maintain sperm suppression. Prostate volumes did not change significantly in either group. In conclusion, these data suggest that the combined administration of NETE and TU at 8-wk intervals represents an effective hormonal contraceptive regimen.

Objective: The frequency and intensity of initial bleeding which can occur during all combined estrogen/progestin therapies (HRT) are also dependent on hormonal pre-treatments and thus possibly also on preceding oral contraception (OC). As yet, no study is available assessing the bleeding pattern, efficacy and acceptance of HRT switching directly from OC. Patients and Methods: 601 women aged 49 ± 3.1 years switched from OC (pills with ethinylestradiol, EE) to estradiol 1 mg/norethisterone acetate 0.5 mg (E2/NETA). Bleeding pattern was assessed after 6 months stratified according to OC-dependent parameters. Secondary aims were efficacy and acceptance of HRT. The study was conducted as an 'observational study', according to 67 AMG. Results: Under E2/NETA treatment, the amenorrhea rate increased from 41.3% at cycle 1 to 77.0% at cycle 6, the number of bleeding days decreased from 5.3 to 1.4 days. The bleeding pattern was not influenced by duration of switching, phase type, or dosage of EE. However, bleeding during HRT occurred significantly more often up to the 6th cycle in the 15% of women who had irregular bleeding during OC. During OC 56% of the women had climacteric complaints, which were almost completely ameliorated by HRT. The drop-out rate was 5%, 13% refused a further treatment. Conclusion: Women, aged on average 49 years, can quickly face a high amenorrhea rate after switching directly from OC to low-dose E2/NETA. This effect is independent of switching duration, type and EE-dosage of the OC. Since during HRT significantly more and heavier bleeding has been observed, especially in women who displayed irregular bleeding during OC, this should be clarified before treatment. Of special interest was that more than 50% of the women had climacteric complaints during OC which could be treated successfully by HRT.

Objective This study shows the effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT), using oral estrogen exclusively or in combination with progestin, on platelet activation in healthy menopaused women. Background Recent evidence from studies of postmenopausal HRT in healthy women demonstrated a short-time increased risk of coronary heart disease. Platelet activation, which generates vasoconstrictory thromboxane A 2 (TxA 2 ), has been related to the risk of cardiovascular diseases. Methods By means of a placebo-controlled study twenty-seven postmenopausal patients were continuously orally administered estrogen in combination with progestin or estrogen exclusively for an 8-week period. Platelet activation was evaluated by flow cytometric P-selectin expression and by enzyme immunoassay plasmatic TxA 2 (TxB 2 ) concentrations. Results P-selectin binding index changed from 6.3±3.6 to 7.0±3 in the placebo group ( n =10); from 5.9+2.2 to 7.9±3.3 in the E+P group ( n =8) and from 6.4+2.7 to 7.1±1.9 in the E group ( n =9). Plasma concentrations of TxB 2 before and after intervention, changed from 1.2+1.2 to 1.5+1.4 (pg/well) in the placebo group; significantly ( p =0.005) in the E+P group ( n =8), from 0.9+0.3 to 6.1+6.5 (pg/well), and from 1.3+1.5 to 0.8+0.4 (pg/well) in the E group ( n =8; mean+standard deviation, basal×therapy, p Conclusions Healthy menopaused women who were administered estradiol in association with norethisterone continuously had an increase of plasmatic thromboxane, possibly determined by platelet activation, which indicates a higher short-term thrombotic risk. P-selectin expression analyses failed to demonstrate the impact of HRT on platelets.

Oral contraceptives (OC) and postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) modulate plasma levels of proteins that regulate blood coagulation. It remains unclear whether the progestin component contributes to these changes. The present study was designed to determine whether progestins modulate two essential plasma anticoagulants, antithrombin (AT) and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), in an animal model. Ovariectomized rats were treated orally with three progestins, norethindrone acetate (NETA), trimegestone (TMG), or drospirenone (DSP), either alone or combined with 17alpha-ethyinylestradiol (EE). Plasma AT levels were unchanged. However, TFPI activity was reduced by EE alone (10-100 microg/kg/day) in a dose-dependent manner; NETA (3 or 10 mg/kg/day) reduced TFPI by approximately 40 or approximately 80%, respectively, while TMG and DSP had no effect. NETA and EE effects were blocked by co-administration of ICI-182,780, an estrogen receptor antagonist, suggesting that both responses were likely estrogen receptor-mediated. Reduced TFPI after NETA or EE treatment was not accompanied by changes in TFPI mRNA levels in tissues that express TFPI, but there was a positive correlation between plasma TFPI and total cholesterol. Sex hormone effects on TFPI in this model and as reported in women may help to shift the coagulation balance to a more prothrombotic state. Progestins such as TMG and DSP that lack estrogenic activity could potentially have an improved clinical profile.

Objectives: A prospective, randomized, open-label study was conducted to evaluate effects on mammographic density in postmenopausal and late perimenopausal women receiving continuous combined or sequential combined hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Methods: The subjects were randomized to treatment with low-dose continuous combined HRT containing 1 mg 17-estradiol plus 0.5 mg norethisterone acetate (Activelle ® ) or a sequential combined HRT regimen consisting of 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogens for 28 days plus 5 mg medrogestone for 14 days (Presomen ® ). Mammograms were obtained at baseline and after 9 cycles (each 28 days) of treatment. Results: The majority of women (approximately two-thirds in each treatment group) had no changes in mammographic breast density between baseline and the final study visit. There were no marked differences between treatment groups. Approximately 20% of women in both groups had a slight increase in mammographic density. Only 10–14% of women in both groups had a pronounced increase in mammographic density. The analyses of the degree of change showed no remarkable differences between treatments. Conclusion: These results indicate that the increase in mammographic density with a low-dose continuous combined HRT regimen is no greater than that with a sequential combined HRT regimen. The type of progestogen does not have an impact on the extent of mammographic density changes. © 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Summary objective Medroxyprogesterone (MP) was used as the progestogen in randomized clinical trials of postmenopausal hormone replacement on cardiovascular risk. To attempt to understand the lack of benefit in these trials, we have examined the effects of MP and two other progestogens, the less androgenic desogestrel (DG) and the more androgenic norethisterone (NE), on cardiovascular risk factors against a background of oestrogen therapy. design and measurements Thirty-four women were treated with conjugated equine oestrogens (CEE) 0·625 mg daily alone for 12 weeks, followed in random order by each of the three progestogens (DG 75 µg, MP 10 mg and NE 1 mg daily) given sequentially for three 12-week cycles while maintaining the same CEE treatment. We measured serum lipoproteins, paraoxonase activity, C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, fasting glucose and insulin levels at baseline, at the end of the oestrogen-only phase and at the end of each of the combined oestrogen and progestogen phases. results The addition of progestogens to CEE maintained the oestrogen-induced reduction in apolipoprotein B (apo B) and lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], and further lowered total cholesterol (P

OBJECTIVE To delineate the influence of hormone therapy (HT) on features of metabolic syndrome with special reference to the composition and mode of administration of three specific HT regimens, all containing estradiol (E2) + norethisterone. DESIGN The Women's Health in the Lund Area project screened all women (n = 10,766), born between 1935 and 1945. Complete data were obtained from 6,917 women. Those at or above defined cutoff limits were considered positively screened (n = 3,593) for metabolic syndrome. All of them were invited to undergo an oral glucose tolerance test; 2,923 women accepted. After excluding 200 women with impaired fasting glucose, 2,723 women were included in the present analysis. Serum lipids were determined by conventional standard methods at the department of clinical chemistry of Lund University Hospital. RESULTS According to World Health Organization criteria, 2,123 women had normal glucose tolerance and 600 women had impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). IGT was less common (P = 0.001) among users of a transdermal patch [CYC-TRANS; E2 50 microg + norethisterone acetate (NETA) 250microg] compared with the two-combined oral regimen [CON-O (continuous oral E2 2 mg + NETA 1 mg) + CYC-O (sequential oral E2 2 mg + NETA 1 mg)]. Furthermore, IGT was more common among CON-O users when compared with either the CYC-O + CYC-TRANS group (P = 0.002) or the CYC-TRANS only group (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences between CYC-O versus CYC-TRANS or CON-O. Serum levels of total cholesterol were higher in the CYC-TRANS group than in the combined CON-O + CYC-O group (P < 0.05); they also were higher (P = 0.05) when comparing the CYC-O + CYC-TRANS versus CON-O as well as higher in CYC-TRANS versus CON-O (P < 0.05). Serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were higher in the CYC-O (P = 0.001), CYC-TRANS (P < 0.05), and the CYC-O + CYC-TRANS (P = 0.001) groups when compared with the CON-O users. There were no differences in the mean age, blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), body mass index, waste-hip ratio, or the rate of cigarette and alcohol consumption between the different hormone regimens. CONCLUSION The risk of having a pathological glucose load was lower in transdermal versus oral users of HT. Transdermal HT could be regarded as first-line treatment in women at risk of developing diabetes.

This double-blind, randomized, multicenter study was designed to compare the blood lipid profiles in postmenopausal women after treatment with either a combined formulation containing estradiol (2 mg) and trimegestone (TMG 0.25 or 0.5 mg) or a standard hormone therapy (HT) containing estradiol and norethisterone acetate.The serum concentrations of several lipids and lipoproteins were measured in this study, which was conducted over 13 cycles, each of 28 days. A total of 487 subjects were included, 349 of whom completed the study.The circulating concentrations of high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, HDL2 cholesterol and apolipoprotein (apo) AI increased from baseline in both estradiol/trimegestone groups, whilst levels of HDL3 cholesterol were unchanged. In contrast, in the estradiol/norethisterone acetate group, HDL cholesterol, HDL3 cholesterol and apo AI concentrations were reduced from baseline, while HDL2 cholesterol remained unchanged. Total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, lipoprotein(a) and apo-B concentrations were reduced in all treatment groups. The concentration of triglycerides was elevated after treatment with the estradiol/trimegestone combinations but was unchanged after treatment with the estradiol/norethisterone acetate combination. The differences in the lipid pattern between the groups may be explained by the different pharmacological properties of the two progestogens: norethisterone exerts an androgenic effect and opposes the estrogen-induced increase in HDL cholesterol, whilst trimegestone has no androgenic effect and does not oppose the estrogenic effect.Overall, the results of this study suggest that the use of trimegestone in combination with estradiol may be preferable to norethisterone acetate because of the more favorable HDL and apo AI profile.

Synthetic 19-nortestosterone-derived progestins show affinity for the androgen receptor (AR) and retain varying degrees of androgenic activity. In this study, AR- and progesterone receptor (PR)-dependent transcriptional activation induced by norethisterone (NET), levonorgestrel (LNG) and gestodene (GSD), and their 5alpha-reduced derivatives, including limited trypsin digestion of AR in the presence of natural and synthetic progestins were investigated. The results confirmed the progestogenic activity of the three 19-nortestosterone derivatives, which decreases after reduction of the 4-ene-double bound. These compounds were able to activate AR-dependent reporter gene expression, LNG and GSD being the stronger activators. 5alpha-Reduction of LNG and GSD did not change their androgenic transcriptional activity; however, the activation of AR by 5alpha-NET was four-fold higher than NET. The highest selectivity transcriptional index, as a measure of progestogenicity versus androgenicity, was obtained for NET. The 5alpha-reduced derivatives had values significantly lower than those of their parent compounds. Non-reduced and 5alpha-reduced 19-nortestosterone progestins induced virtually identical proteolysis fragmentation patterns of the AR to those observed with DHT.

Isotretinoin is a known teratogen, and when it is prescribed to women of childbearing potential, 2 forms of contraception must be used, commonly including hormonal contraception. Although isotretinoin and estradiol are metabolized largely by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and glucuronidation, the potential for clinical drug interaction, with subsequent pharmacodynamic impact, has not been evaluated.We enrolled 26 healthy women who were to receive isotretinoin for the treatment of severe, recalcitrant nodular acne and who were taking or planning to take oral contraceptives. The pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone (INN, norethisterone) (the components of Ortho Novum 7/7/7; Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc, Raritan, NJ) and pharmacodynamic assessments of oral contraceptive effectiveness (concentrations of serum progesterone, luteinizing hormone, and follicle-stimulating hormone) were determined on days 6 and 20 of 2 separate oral contraceptive cycles, before and during isotretinoin treatment.The addition of isotretinoin to the oral contraceptive regimen resulted in small and inconsistent, although statistically significant (P.04), decreases in the concentrations of both ethinyl estradiol (9% decrease in area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours after the dose on day 6) and norethindrone (11% decrease in maximum plasma concentration on day 20). Isotretinoin did not cause any statistically significant increases in pharmacodynamic markers, although a majority of women had increases in these measures. Although there was no correlation between isotretinoin (or metabolite) levels and oral contraceptive levels (P.05), there was a correlation between progesterone level and oral contraceptive levels (P.05). Variability was large for both pharmacokinetic measures (median coefficients of variation of 44%-69% [for each time point within a study period]) and pharmacodynamic measures (median coefficients of variation of 64%-114%). One woman in each study phase, one before and one during isotretinoin treatment, had a progesterone elevation consistent with possible ovulation. No serious or unexpected adverse events were observed.The small reduction in ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone levels associated with isotretinoin was not associated with any pharmacodynamic changes in our study. The combination of the teratogenic risk of isotretinoin and the large variability of and correlation between oral contraceptive levels and pharmacodynamic measures, however, strongly reinforces the necessity of additional contraceptive methods during concomitant administration of these drugs.

Objective To determine the role of an aromatase inhibitor, letrozole, in the treatment of reproductive-age women with endometriosis and associated chronic pelvic pain. Design Phase 2, open-label, nonrandomized proof-of-concept study. Setting Outpatient tertiary-care center. Patient(s) Ten patients with endometriosis, all previously treated both medically and surgically, with unsatisfactory results. Intervention(s) Endometriosis was diagnosed by biopsy and scored from an initial diagnostic laparoscopy performed within 1 month before treatment was begun. Oral administration of letrozole (2.5 mg), the progestin norethindrone acetate (2.5 mg), calcium citrate (1,250 mg), and vitamin D (800 IU) was done daily for 6 months. Within 1–2 months after completion of the treatment, a second-look laparoscopy was performed to score and biopsy endometriosis. Main outcome measure(s) Changes in American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) scores for endometriosis, pelvic pain assessed by visual analog scale, serum hormone levels (FSH, LH, E 2 , and estrone [E 1 ]), and bone density (DEXA scan). Result(s) No histologically demonstrable endometriosis was present in any patient during the second-look laparoscopy. ASRM and pelvic pain scores decreased significantly in response to treatment. Overall, no significant change in bone density was detected. Gonadotropin levels were not significantly altered by treatment, and although circulating E 2 and E 1 levels were reduced, the decrease was not statistically significant. Conclusion(s) The combination of letrozole and norethindrone acetate achieved marked reduction of laparoscopically visible and histologically confirmed endometriosis in all 10 patients and significant pain relief in nine out of 10 patients who had not responded previously to currently available treatments. On this basis, letrozole should be a candidate for the medical management of endometriosis.

Little is known about the regulatory effects of steroid hormones on the intestinal H(+)/oligopeptide transporter PEPT1. In the present study, we investigated the effects of progesterone and its related compounds on the uptake of cephalexin, a typical PEPT1 substrate, using the human intestinal cell line Caco-2. Caco-2 cell monolayers were cultured on plastic cell culture plates coated with rat tail collagen type I. The determination of cephalexin uptake was performed with HPLC. To investigate the effect of progesterone treatment on cephalexin uptake, the monolayers were incubated with cephalexin after progesterone treatment. Progesterone decreased cephalexin uptake in a concentration-dependent manner, and the IC(50) value was calculated to be 2.3 microM. A significant decrease in cephalexin uptake was observed after progesterone treatment for 12 h, and the decrease was maximal when the monolayers were treated for 24-72 h. Cephalexin uptake was significantly inhibited by treatments with 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone, norethisterone, and chlormadinone. By contrast, treatment with dehydroepiandrosterone, pregnenolone, estradiol, testosterone, hydrocortisone, and dexamethasone did not affect cephalexin uptake. The effects of progesterone and norethisterone treatment on the kinetic parameters of cephalexin uptake were investigated. The saturable component of cephalexin uptake was markedly inhibited by progesterone and norethisterone treatments. The J(max) of cephalexin uptake with progesterone and norethisterone treatments was significantly decreased compared with the control, whereas K(m) and K(d) values were not affected. Therefore the quantitative decrease in PEPT1 density is considered to be one cause of the decrease in cephalexin uptake with progesterone and norethisterone treatments.

The term progestogen has been widely utilized to indicate the general class of agents that includes both progesterone and its synthetic analogs, whereas the term progestin refers only to synthetic progestational steroids. The development of progestins has been influenced in a major way by the search for orally active hormonal contraceptives, since it is likely that hormonal contraceptives will continue to utilize a progestin, the only possible alternative being represented by the utilization of antiprogestins. Synthetic progestogens in clinical use today belong to three main chemical families: progesterone derivatives (progesterone, retro-progesterone, 19-norprogesterone and 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone); gonane and 19-nortestosterone derivatives (norethisterone, levonorgestrel, desogestrel, gestodene, norgestimate); a spironolactone derivative. Biological potency of progestogens varies depending on the end-point measured, usually ovulation inhibition and endometrial transformation; with both these tests, the most active compounds are all gonane derivatives, with a potency over a 100 times that of the natural hormone. When administered in adequate doses, a progestin inhibits fertility by inhibiting ovulation. This action is mainly exerted at the hypothalamic level where, physiologically, progesterone decreases the number of LH pulses. When progestogens are delivered directly to the uterine cavity, their action seems to be purely local. It has been amply proven that--even when administered in doses that do not constantly inhibit ovulation--a progestin can still remain effective as a contraceptive by acting at the level of the cervical mucus and, at least in part, of the endometrium. Progestogens utilized today differ largely in their pharmacokinetics. In general, after intake, these compounds are rapidly absorbed and distributed so that peak serum concentrations are reached between 1 and 4 h. Third-generation progestins (desogestrel, gestodene, norgestimate) have common characteristics: a higher affinity for progesterone receptors than their predecessors, a lower affinity for androgen receptors, a higher selectivity of action, a higher central inhibitory activity, a higher potency at the level of the endometrium, and an overall metabolic neutrality, in terms of effects on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. In general, progestins can induce two types of adverse effects: changes in lipid metabolism and bleeding irregularities. Whereas the newer compounds seem to have overcome the first of these adverse effects, the second remains untouched: to this day, proper cycle control can only be achieved with combined hormonal contraceptives.

Since writing an editorial for this journal in 20141 I have been repeatedly asked about my views on postponing menstruation. Women in the 21st century want to avoid periods when on holiday yet have difficulty accepting highly effective, reversible forms of contraception which provide infrequent bleeding. Authors of a BMJ article published 16 years ago suggested that prescribing progestogens to delay periods was a lifestyle choice and should not be funded by the National Health Service.2 I am not sure I feel that strongly but I do think women need to know all options and any potential risks or side effects associated with each treatment – they may think twice. Only one drug is licensed to postpone menstruation in the UK and that is norethisterone. The Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) state that at low dose’ (5 mg three times a day) norethisterone may be used to treat “metropathia haemorrhagica, premenstrual syndrome, postponement of menstruation, dysmenorrhoea, endometriosis and menorrhagia”.3 There is limited evidence to support these indications1 but it does delay the onset of …

To investigate short-term and long-term effects of combined hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on C-reactive protein (CRP) and fibrinogen plasma concentrations in healthy postmenopausal women.In this cross-sectional study 241 healthy postmenopausal women were enrolled. A total of 81 women were receiving the following treatments for 3 months; transdermal 17beta-estradiol (17beta-E2) + medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) (n = 21), oral 17beta-E2 + norethisterone acetate (NETA) (n = 27), and conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) + MPA (n = 33). The same combined therapies were implemented in another 58 women for 12 months; transdermal 17beta-E2 + MPA (n = 10), oral 17beta-E2 + NETA (n = 16), and CEE + MPA (n = 32). Control group included 102 healthy postmenopausal women not receiving HRT. The effect of the type and the duration of HRT regimens on plasma levels of CRP, fibrinogen and lipids were investigated.Median CRP concentrations were significantly higher in women receiving oral 17beta-E2 + NETA (P = 0.037) and CEE + MPA (P = 0.0001) for 3 months than in women taking the same types of HRT for 12 months and of those were not on HRT. Median CRP levels were similar in women taking transdermal 17beta-E2 + MPA for 3 and 12 months, compared with controls. Fibrinogen levels were not different between nonusers and any group of HRT users.These elevated levels of CRP, which appears very recently as a crucial marker for cardiovascular disease, may be responsible for the early increased cardiovascular risk after starting oral combined HRT. But this increased risk in the early period seems to decrease with long-term use. Transdermal 17beta-E2 + MPA had insignificant effect on CRP both in short-term or in long-term use.

The popular herbal remedy St John's wort is an inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A enzymes and may reduce the efficacy of oral contraceptives. Therefore we evaluated the effect of St John's wort on the disposition and efficacy of Ortho-Novum 1/35 (Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc, Raritan, NJ), a popular combination oral contraceptive pill containing ethinyl estradiol (INN, ethinylestradiol) and norethindrone (INN, norethisterone).Twelve healthy premenopausal women who were using oral contraception (3 months) received a combination oral contraceptive pill (Ortho-Novum 1/35) for 3 consecutive 28-day menstrual cycles. During the second and third cycles, the participants received 300 mg St John's wort 3 times a day. The serum concentrations of ethinyl estradiol (day 7), norethindrone (day 7), follicle-stimulating hormone (days 12-16), luteinizing hormone (days 12-16), progesterone (day 21), and intravenous and oral midazolam (days 22 and 23) were determined in serial blood samples. The incidence of breakthrough bleeding was quantified during the first and third cycles.Concomitant use of St John's wort was associated with a significant (P.05) increase in the oral clearance of norethindrone (8.2 +/- 2.7 L/h to 9.5 +/- 3.4 L/h, P =.042) and a significant reduction in the half-life of ethinyl estradiol (23.4 +/- 19.5 hours to 12.2 +/- 7.1 hours, P =.023). The oral clearance of midazolam was significantly increased (109.2 +/- 47.9 L/h to 166.7 +/- 81.3 L/h, P =.007) during St John's wort administration, but the systemic clearance of midazolam was unchanged (37.7 +/- 11.3 L/h to 39.0 +/- 10.3 L/h, P =.567). Serum concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and progesterone were not significantly affected by St John's wort dosing (P.05). Breakthrough bleeding occurred in 2 of 12 women in the control phase compared with 7 of 12 women in the St John's wort phase. The oral clearance of midazolam after St John's wort dosing was greater in women who had breakthrough bleeding (215.9 +/- 66.5 L/h) than in those who did not (97.5 +/- 37.2 L/h) (P =.005).St John's wort causes an induction of ethinyl estradiol-norethindrone metabolism consistent with increased CYP3A activity. Women taking oral contraceptive pills should be counseled to expect breakthrough bleeding and should consider adding a barrier method of contraception when consuming St Johns wort.

Summary objective Oral but not transdermal oestrogen administration reduces IGF-I, and increases GH binding protein (GHBP) reflecting effects on hepatic endocrine function in postmenopausal women. As progestogens attenuate the effects of oestrogen on circulating lipid levels according to their androgenic properties, we have investigated the impact of progestogen types on the hepatic endocrine effects of oestrogen. design Four progestogens differing in androgenicity were co-administered in a monthly cyclical regimen in random order to postmenopausal women receiving either oral (n = 9, premarin 1·25 mg) or transdermal (n = 10, Estraderm 100 µg patches twice weekly). The four progestogens were cyproterone acetate (CA 5 mg, antiandrogenic), dydrogesterone (20 mg, neutral), medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA 10 mg, mildly androgenic), norethisterone (2·5 mg, androgenic). patients Nineteen postmenopausal women (age 57 ± 3 years, mean ± SE) were studied. measurements The effects of oestrogen alone and the combined effects with each progestogen type on IGF-I, GHBP, SHBG, cholesterol, triglycerides and lipoprotein(a) were investigated. results Mean IGF-I fell while GHBP and SHBG levels increased with oral (P

A randomized controlled multicenter study was undertaken to monitor the effects on hemostasis of two once-a-month injectable contraceptive preparations, Mesigyna (50 mg norethisterone enanthate and 5 mg estradiol valerate) and Cyclofem (25 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate and 5 mg estradiol cypionate) in comparison with a well-known oral contraceptive (OC) Ortho-Novum 1/35 (norethisterone 1 mg and ethinyl estradiol 35 microg). A total of 378 volunteers from four centers (Bangkok, Hangzhou, Santiago and Singapore) were monitored. Blood sampling took place in one pretreatment cycle, the third and ninth injection intervals and one posttreatment cycle. In each of the three treatment groups, a rise in hemoglobin, and increases in platelet count and in prothrombin time were observed. With treatment there was a significant increase in activated partial thromboplastin time among Mesigyna users, no change among Cyclofem users and a significant decrease among OC users. OC use led to increases in plasma levels of fibrinogen, factor VII, factor X, plasminogen, protein C and decreases in plasma levels of t-PAI and antithrombin. Use of combined injectables induced no change (Cyclofem) or decreases (Mesigyna) in plasma levels of fibrinogen, factor VII, factor X and antithrombin. Use of both combined injectables led to decreases in protein C, slight decreases in plasminogen and increases in plasminogen and fibrinogen. Overall, the injectable preparations may be more beneficial than the oral preparation in not enhancing a hypercoagulable state because of the reduced synthesis of fibrinogen, factors VII and X; however, decreases in antithrombin and protein C, which are potent coagulation inhibitors, may raise some concern. Whether these changes can lead to modifications in the risk of arterial or venous disease can only be ascertained by conducting epidemiological studies.

Objective To evaluate the influence by two low doses of oral continuous-combined formulations of 17 β-estradiol (E2) and norethisterone acetate (NETA) on carbohydrate metabolism in healthy postmenopausal women. Design A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Setting Volunteers at a university hospital. Subject One hundred twenty healthy postmenopausal women. Intervention(s) One hundred twenty women were randomized to three treatment arms: (1) E2 1 mg/NETA 0.25 mg group (n = 40); (2) E2 1 mg/NETA 0.5 mg group (n = 40); (3) placebo group (n = 40). A total of 102 women completed 12 months of treatment. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Main outcome measure(s) Fasting glucose, fasting insulin, total area under the curve (AUC) and insulin/glucose index during OGTT. Result(s) Fasting levels of glucose and insulin declined significantly in the E2/NETA 0.5 mg group. At OGTT, the total AUC for insulin declined in both active arms. The curve for glucose increased significantly in the E2/NETA 0.25 mg group. A lower insulin/glucose index was observed during OGTT in both active regimens when compared with placebo. In the active treatment groups, a significant reduction of fasting glucose and/or fasting insulin was encountered in women with higher basal fasting levels (fasting glucose >4.2 mmol/L or log-fasting insulin >0.87). Conclusion(s) Oral low-dose E2 1 mg/NETA 0.5 mg regimen did not impair carbohydrate metabolism, but seemed to improve insulin sensitivity in healthy postmenopausal women.

To exclude that aromatization plays a role in the estrogenic activity of tibolone, we studied the effect tibolone and metabolites on the aromatization of androstenedione and the aromatization of tibolone and its metabolites to 7alpha-methyl-17alpha-ethynylestradiol (7alpha-MEE) by human recombinant aromatase. Testosterone (T), 17alpha-methyltestosterone (MT), 19-nortestosterone (Nan), 7alpha-methyl-19-nortestosterone (MENT) and norethisterone (NET) were used as reference compounds. Sensitive in vitro bioassays with steroid receptors were used to monitor the generation of product and the reduction of substrate. LC-MSMS without derivatization was used for structural confirmation. A 10 times excess of tibolone and its metabolites did not inhibit the conversion of androstenedione to estrone by human recombinant aromatase as determined by estradiol receptor assay whereas T, MT, Nan, and MENT inhibited the conversion for 75, 53, 85 and 67%, respectively. Tibolone, 3alpha- and 3beta-hydroxytibolone were not converted by human aromatase whereas the estrogenic activity formed with the Delta4-isomer suggests a conversion rate of 0.2% after 120 min incubation. In contrast T, MT, Nan, and MENT were completely converted to their A-ring aromates within 15 min while NET could not be aromatized. Aromatization of T, MT, Nan and MENT was confirmed with LC-MSMS. Structure/function analysis indicated that the 17alpha-ethynyl-group prevents aromatization of (19-nor)steroids while 7alpha-methyl substitution had no effect. Our results with the sensitive estradiol receptor assays show that in contrast to reference compounds tibolone and its metabolites are not aromatized.

The results from the Women's Health Initiative study on enhanced breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women using an estrogen/progestin combination clearly indicate the need for a comparison of different progestins with regard to cancer risk. To shed some light on this issue, we have investigated the influence of progesterone and various synthetic C19- and C21-progestins on cell proliferation of a human breast cancer cell line in vitro. Of special interested was the comparison of two different regimens commonly used in HRT, sequential and continuous combination with estradiol. We used the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 as a model. Progesterone (P), chlormadinone acetate (CMA), dienogest (DNG), gestodene (GSD), 3-ketodesogestrel (KDG), levonorgestrel (LNG), medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), and norethisterone (NET) were investigated in the range of 0.01nm to 10 micro M alone and in combination with 10 nM estradiol. Cell proliferation was measured after 7 days using the ATP chemosensitivity test. Tested alone, CMA, DNG, GSD, KDG, MPA and NET significantly stimulated cell proliferation, but only at high dosages. Sequentially combined with estradiol, only CMA inhibited cell proliferation over the whole concentration range. Slight effects were found for DNG, GSD and KDG, whereas P and MPA only showed an effect at the highest concentration. NET had no significant effect on cell proliferation. Continuously combined, all progestins exhibited an inhibitory effect over the whole concentration range. The most prominent effects were found for P, CMA, GSD, and KDG. Only slight effects were found for DNG, MPA and NET. Our in vitro results indicate that the influence on breast cancer risk using HRT in postmenopausal women might depend on the type of progestin used as well as on the regimen applied. However, the net inhibitory in vitro effect of the progestins at clinically relevant dosages is rather minimal, and whether progestins in general can reduce breast cancer risk in long-term treatment remains uncertain. Further clinical trials are urgently needed to clarify this issue.

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of endometrial hyperplasia in subjects who receive continuous norethindrone acetate and ethinyl estradiol combinations versus unopposed ethinyl estradiol.Nine hundred forty-five postmenopausal women were randomly selected for 12 months of treatment with one of six blinded norethindrone acetate/ethinyl estradiol combinations (milligrams of norethindrone acetate/micrograms of ethinyl estradiol: 0/5, 0.25/5, 1/5, 0/10, 0.5/10, or 1/10) or to open-label 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogens/2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate. Endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial proliferation were assessed by biopsy at screening, months 6 and 12.Endometrial hyperplasia developed in 26 subjects: Placebo, 0/5 and 0.25/5 (1 subject each) and 0/10 (23 subjects). Significantly less endometrial proliferation was measured in the 1/5 norethindrone acetate/ethinyl estradiol and other norethindrone acetate/ethinyl estradiol combination groups and in the 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogens/2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate group, than in unopposed ethinyl estradiol groups (6 months: P.004; 12 months: P.001). Treatment with 1/5 norethindrone acetate/ethinyl estradiol and with other norethindrone acetate/ethinyl estradiol combinations significantly reduced endometrial proliferation compared with 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogens/2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (6 and 12 months: P.02).Norethindrone acetate protects the endometrium from estrogen-induced hyperplasia and changes in proliferative status. In addition, norethindrone acetate/ethinyl estradiol-treated subjects had significantly less endometrial proliferation compared with 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogens/2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate-treated subjects.

Toxicity of 17α-ethynylestradiol (EE2) and norethindrone (NOR), constituents of low dosage oral contraceptives, was assessed for the freshwater cladoceran Daphnia magna. Acute toxicity tests showed that 5 ppm of EE2, the highest concentration in this study, never inhibited swimming, whereas NOR inhibited swimming at >3 ppm: 48 h EC50 for NOR was 6.41 ppm. Chronic toxicity tests were carried out for 25 days by measuring the number of offspring, moltings and sex ratios of neonates at 20, 100 and 500 ppb. EE2>100 ppb significantly decreased the number of offspring to 75% of the control; however, no effect was observed in molting and sex ratios at

Tranexamic acid (Transamin), Cyklokapron, Exacyl, Cyklo-f) is a synthetic lysine derivative that exerts its antifibrinolytic effect by reversibly blocking lysine binding sites on plasminogen and thus preventing fibrin degradation. In a number of small clinical studies in women with idiopathic menorrhagia, tranexamic acid 2-4.5 g/day for 4-7 days reduced menstrual blood loss by 34-59% over 2-3 cycles, significantly more so than placebo, mefenamic acid, flurbiprofen, etamsylate and oral luteal phase norethisterone at clinically relevant dosages. Intrauterine administration of levonorgestrel 20 microg/day, however, produced the greatest reduction (96% after 12 months) in blood loss; 44% of patients treated with levonorgestrel developed amenorrhoea. Tranexamic acid 1.5 g three times daily for 5 days also significantly reduced menstrual blood loss in women with intrauterine contraceptive device-associated menorrhagia compared with diclofenac sodium (150 mg in three divided doses on day 1 followed by 25 mg three times daily on days 2-5) or placebo. Tranexamic acid, mefenamic acid, etamsylate, flurbiprofen or diclofenac sodium had no effect on the duration of menses in the studies that reported such data. In a large noncomparative, nonblind, quality-of-life study, 81% of women were satisfied with tranexamic acid 3-6 g/day for 3-4 days/cycle for three cycles, and 94% judged their menstrual blood loss to be 'decreased' or 'strongly decreased' compared with untreated menstruations. The most commonly reported drug-related adverse events are gastrointestinal in nature. The total incidence of nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and dyspepsia in a double-blind study was 12% in patients who received tranexamic acid 1g four times daily for 4 days for two cycles (not significantly different to the incidence in placebo recipients). In conclusion, the oral antifibrinolytic drug tranexamic acid is an effective and well tolerated treatment for idiopathic menorrhagia. In clinical trials, tranexamic acid was more effective at reducing menstrual blood loss than mefenamic acid, flurbiprofen, etamsylate and oral luteal phase norethisterone. Although it was not as effective as intrauterine administration of levonorgestrel, the high incidence of amenorrhoea and adverse events such as intermenstrual bleeding resulting from such treatment may be unacceptable to some patients. Comparative studies of tranexamic acid with epsilon - aminocaproic acid, danazol and combined oral contraceptives, as well as long-term tolerability studies, would help to further define the place of the drug in the treatment of menorrhagia. Nevertheless, tranexamic acid may be considered as a first-line treatment for the initial management of idiopathic menorrhagia, especially for patients in whom hormonal treatment is either not recommended or not wanted.

As part of the development of a combination product containing norethindrone acetate and low-dose ethinyl estradiol for continuous hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women, a study was conducted to determine the effect of a high-fat meal on the bioavailability of norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol from tablets containing 1 mg norethindrone acetate/10 micrograms ethinyl estradiol. Eighteen healthy postmenopausal women participated in an open-label, single-dose, randomized, three-way crossover study in which 2 x 1/10 norethindrone acetate/ethinyl estradiol tablets were administered fasting and with a high-fat breakfast, and the same dose was administered in solution. Following each treatment, serial blood samples were collected for 48 hours, and plasma ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone concentrations were determined by a validated gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) method. Individual plasma ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental methods for each treatment and analyzed by ANOVA to obtain differences between least squares treatment mean values and associated 90% confidence intervals. Rates of ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone availability from tablets administered with food were slower than availability rates from tablets administered while fasting. Systemic exposure to ethinyl estradiol was unaffected by administration of tablets with food, whereas exposure to norethindrone increased by 27%. Because administration of norethindrone acetate/ethinyl estradiol 1/10 tablets with a high-fat meal did not decrease systemic exposure to norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol, this formulation can be taken without regard to meals.

So far, most epidemiological studies investigating breast cancer risk and hormone replacement therapy have been conducted with conjugated equine estrogens (CEE). Recent trials indicate that the addition of progestogens may increase breast cancer risk. In the present study, we compared the effects of the human estrogen 17beta-estradiol (E(2)) with those of the main equine components of CEE, i.e. equilin (Eq) and 17alpha-dihydroequilin (Dheq) on the proliferation of human breast cancer cells. The proliferative effect of progestogen addition was also investigated.The well-established human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 was used as an in vitro model. The proliferative effect of E(2), Eq and Dheq was tested in the concentration range 0.01-10 nmol/l. The progestogens progesterone, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and norethisterone (NET) were continuously combined with 0.1 nmol/l estrogen at concentrations of 0.01 nmol/l, 1 nmol/l, 0.1 mumol/l and 10 mumol/l. Proliferation was measured after 7 days by the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) chemosensitivity test.All three estrogens increased the proliferation of MCF-7 cells by between 40 and 180%. The most proliferatively potent estrogen was E(2), followed by Eq and Dheq, which showed a slightly lower proliferative activity than E(2). The addition of progesterone inhibited E(2)-induced proliferation by about 30%, but only at the high non-physiological concentration of 10 mumol/l. All three progestogens inhibited Eq-induced proliferation, although their effect tended to be low, with values between 5 and 40%. No progestogen reduced Dheq-induced proliferation by more than 20%. In contrast, MPA slightly increased the proliferation rate by about 5% at the high physiological concentration of 0.1 mumol/l when combined with Dheq. The same held true when MPA and NET were added at the high pharmacological concentration of 10 mumol/l, causing increases of about 10%.Our results indicate that equine estrogens have a proliferative action similar to that of 17beta-estradiol. Continuous addition of progestogens does not result in any major reduction of proliferative potency. Some progestogens may even enhance the estrogen-induced proliferation of pre-existing breast cancer cells, particularly when combined with certain equine estrogens. However, in none of the tested circumstances do progestogens increase the proliferative effect of estradiol, and progesterone has no deleterious effect even at pharmacological levels, in contrast to progestogens.

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects on vaginal bleeding patterns of continuous combined hormone replacement therapy with norethindrone acetate and ethinyl estradiol versus conjugated equine estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate.Three hundred fifty-seven postmenopausal women were selected randomly (in a blinded manner) to 12 months of treatment with 1 mg norethindrone acetate/5 microg ethinyl estradiol, placebo, or open-label 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogens/2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (conjugated equine estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate [CEE/MPA]; Prempro). The incidence and duration of vaginal bleeding were assessed throughout the study. Statistical analyses used Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel methodology and analysis of variance.At 3 months, 1 mg norethindrone acetate/5 microg ethinyl estradiol therapy reduced the incidence of bleeding (12% vs 23%; P.029) and bleeding and/or spotting (22% vs 44%; P.001), compared with conjugated equine estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate therapy. The mean duration of bleeding and bleeding and/or spotting were also reduced with 1 mg norethindrone acetate/5 microg ethinyl estradiol therapy versus conjugated equine estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate (P =.004 and P.001, respectively). The incidence of cumulative amenorrhea at every monthly interval was significantly better with 1 mg norethindrone acetate/5 microg ethinyl estradiol therapy versus conjugated equine estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate therapy (P.05). Associated adverse event (ie, headache, breast pain) incidence rates were similar in the 2 active treatment groups.The 1 mg norethindrone acetate/5 microg ethinyl estradiol therapy provides significantly better control of vaginal bleeding than conjugated equine estrogens/medroxyprogesterone acetate therapy at all time points investigated in this 12-month study.

Introduction: The objective of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of a continuous combined oral preparation of norethisterone (norethindrone) acetate and ethinylestradiol (NA/EE) [FemHRT®] as both a first-line and second-line therapy for menopausal women. Perspective: Third-party payer. Methods: The cost effectiveness of NA/EE was assessed as both a first- and second-line therapy in comparison with conjugated equine oestrogen 0.625mg and medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5mg (CEE/MPA) and no therapy. Analysis was conducted within a Markov model with states relating to the presence and absence of vaginal bleeding, menopausal symptoms and hip fracture. Analysis forecasted life expectancy, QALYs and lifetime costs for a 50-year-old menopausal woman. Compliance was modelled related to menopausal symptoms and vaginal bleeding. For the base-case analysis, it was assumed that compliant women would take therapy for up to 5 years. Sensitivity analysis assumed therapy was taken only for 1 year. Results: Compared with both CEE/MPA and no therapy, NA/EE led to an increase in both costs and QALYs, both as a first- and second-line therapy. For first-line therapy, the incremental cost per QALY gained for NA/EE was $2200 Canadian dollars ($Can; 1999 values) [compared with no therapy] and was $Can20 300 (compared with CEE/MPA). For second-line therapy, the incremental cost per QALY gained for NA/EE was $Can900 (compared with no therapy) and was $Can16 400 (compared with CEE/MPA). Results were robust to most sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: NA/EE is a cost-effective therapy for women with menopausal symptoms both as a first-line and second-line therapy.

Dienogest (DNG) is already used in hormone therapy, since recently being also the progestogenic component of the first estradiol based contraceptive pill. Data on breast cancer risk are currently not available. Progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1) is highly expressed in tissues of breast cancer patients and has already been proposed as a predictor for breast cancer risk.MCF-7 cells overexpressing PGRMC1 were stimulated with DNG, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), norethisterone (NET) and progesterone (P) as well as sequentially and continuously combined with estradiol (E2).DNG and MPA alone elicited a significant proliferation at 10⁻⁶ and 10⁻⁵ M. NET increased cell proliferation at all concentrations tested whereas P showed no effect. E2 alone elicited a significant increase at 10⁻¹⁰ M, no effect was seen at 10⁻¹² M. Addition of the progestins (10⁻⁶ M) to E2 at 10⁻¹⁰ M had, compared to E2 only, no additional proliferating effect. However, at the low E2 concentration, DNG, MPA and NET significantly increased the E2-stimulated cell proliferation.DNG increased proliferation alone and in combination with low E2 concentrations. Thus a progestogen-derived breast cancer risk in the presence of low E2 concentrations cannot be excluded at least in women overexpressing PGRMC1.

Background: Our aim was to compare the therapeutic efficacies of norethisterone acid (NETA), tranexamic acid and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in treating idiopathic heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). Methods: Women with heavy uterine bleeding were randomized to receive NETA, tranexamic acid or LNG-IUS for 6 months. The primary outcome was a decrease in menstrual bleeding as assessed by pictorial blood loss assessment charts and hematological parameters analyzed at the 1st, 3rd and 6th months. Health-related quality of life (QOL) variables were also recorded and analyzed. Results: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled in each treatment group, but the results of only 62 were evaluated. NETA, tranexamic acid, and LNG-IUS reduced menstrual blood loss (MBL) by 53.1, 60.8, and 85.8%, respectively, at the 6th month. LNG-IUS was more effective than NETA and tranexamic acid in decreasing MBL. LNG-IUS was also more efficient than tranexamic acid in correcting anemia related to menorrhagia. Satisfaction rates were comparable among the NETA (70%), tranexamic acid (63%) and LNG-IUS (77%) groups. QOL in physical aspects increased significantly in the tranexamic acid and LNG-IUS groups. Conclusion: The positive effect of LNG-IUS on QOL parameters, as well as its high efficacy, makes it a first-line option for HMB.

Background: Evidence from systematic reviews of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women, however the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have had mixed results. This is an updated version of a Cochrane review published in 2013. Objectives: To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women, and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention.Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to (i) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced (= 10 years versus < 10 years), and where these data were not available, use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy (= 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age); and (ii) assess the effects of length of time on treatment. Search methods: We searched the following databases on 25 February 2014: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS. We also searched research and trials registers, and conducted reference checking of relevant studies and related systematic reviews to identify additional studies. Selection criteria: RCTs of women comparing orally administered hormone therapy with placebo or a no treatment control, with a minimum of six months follow-up. Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome. We combined results using random effects meta-analyses, and undertook further analyses to assess the effects of treatment as primary or secondary prevention, and whether treatment was commenced more than or less than 10 years after menopause. Main results: We identified six new trials through this update. Therefore the review includes 19 trials with a total of 40,410 post-menopausal women. On the whole, study quality was good and generally at low risk of bias; the findings are dominated by the three largest trials. We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, angina, or revascularisation. However, there was an increased risk of stroke in those in the hormone therapy arm for combined primary and secondary prevention (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.41). Venous thromboembolic events were increased (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.69), as were pulmonary emboli (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.48) on hormone therapy relative to placebo. The absolute risk increase for stroke was 6 per 1000 women (number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) = 165; mean length of follow-up: 4.21 years (range: 2.0 to 7.1)); for venous thromboembolism 8 per 1000 women (NNTH = 118; mean length of follow-up: 5.95 years (range: 1.0 to 7.1)); and for pulmonary embolism 4 per 1000 (NNTH = 242; mean length of follow-up: 3.13 years (range: 1.0 to 7.1)). We performed subgroup analyses according to when treatment was started in relation to the menopause. Those who started hormone therapy less than 10 years after the menopause had lower mortality (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.95, moderate quality evidence) and coronary heart disease (composite of death from cardiovascular causes and non-fatal myocardial infarction) (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.96; moderate quality evidence), though they were still at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.73, high quality evidence) compared to placebo or no treatment. There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group. In those who started treatment more than 10 years after the menopause there was high quality evidence that it had little effect on death or coronary heart disease between groups but there was an increased risk of stroke (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.38, high quality evidence) and venous thromboembolism (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.80, high quality evidence). Authors' conclusions: Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall, for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events. © 2015 The Cochrane Collaboration.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of women presenting irregular bleeding episodes following 9 months of treatment with a low dose continuous combined hormone replacement therapy consisting of estradiol (E2) and norethisterone acetate (NETA) versus a sequential hormone replacement therapy consisting of conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) and medrogestone (MG). Secondary aims were to establish the relationship between menopausal age and the occurrence of irregular bleeding for both therapies and to assess the efficacy of both therapies in alleviating menopausal symptoms. Methods: This was a stratified and randomised, open label study conducted with late peri and postmenopausal women at 35 sites in Austria and Germany. A total of 446 women were randomly allocated into two cohorts based on time since last bleeding and then stratified to either a low dose continuous combined therapy consisting of 1 mg E2 and 0.5 mg NETA for 28 days or a sequential therapy consisting of 0.625 mg CEE for 28 days and 5 mg MG for the final 14 days. Bleeding and menopausal complaints were continuously assessed. Treatments were administered for 9 lunar months. Results: The incidence rate of women presenting irregular bleeding episodes including spotting during cycle 9 was 12.2% with 1mgE2/0.5mgNETA and 25.8% with 0.625mgCEE/5mgMG (P=0.0014). In the group of postmenopausal women (time since last bleeding ⩾12 months) the incidence of irregular bleeding during cycle 9 was 11.0% for 1mgE2/0.5mgNETA and 25.0% for 0.625mgCEE/5mgMG). In the group of late perimenopausal women (time since last bleeding 6–11 months) the incidence of irregular bleeding was similar for both treatments at cycle 3, but markedly less in patients with 1mgE2/0.5mgNETA at cycle 6 and 9, being significantly different compared to patients with 0.625mgCEE/5mgMG at cycle 6 (P

For women with climacteric complaints still experiencing menstrual bleedings a low-dose gestagen-emphasised preparation is indicated to treat early climacteric complaints and to reach cycle stability. The objective of this study was to document the efficacy and safety of a low-dose sequentially combined hormone replacement therapy (phase 1: 16 tablets containing 1 mg 17[3-estradiol, phase 2: 12 tablets containing 1 mg 17β-estradiol plus 1 mg norethisterone acetate) in the treatment of women with climacteric symptoms. This post marketing surveillance study is a prospective non-interfering systematic collection of data gathered during routine treatment. Assessments done by gynaecologists include bleeding profile, climacteric symptom relief, patient's/doctor's acceptance and adverse events. Result are presented of 4010 women aged 45.6 years ± 2.9, who received the sequentially combined medication for an average of 180 days. 91% of the women had regular cycles after treatment and of the women with an irregular cycle at baseline 89% regained a regular cycle after treatment. Heavy menstrual bleedings decreased from 26.3% to 3.7% and the frequency of irregular bleedings decreased from 31.1% to 9.7%. Vasomotor symptoms, sleep disorders and nervousness/irritability disappeared or improved in 95%, 89%, and 89% resp. from baseline. Less than 1% of the symptoms worsened. 91 % of the patients and 93% of the doctors rated the treatment as satisfactory. Only 2% of the study population reported one or more adverse events, most frequently irregular bleedings or strong menstrual bleedings. Low-dose estradiol sequentially combined with norethisterone acetate is proven to be effective and safe in routine treatment for women with climacteric symptoms and cycle irregularities.

This article is focused on the use of norethisterone acetate as progestogen in hormone replacement therapy. Emphasis is made on the fact that the primary reason for adding a progestogen to hormone replacement therapy is to protect the endometrium against hyperplasia. In this paper we review data that demonstrate that hormone replacement therapy that includes norethisterone acetate has positive effects on the postmenopausal bone metabolism and that it increases bone mass more than expected and more than treatment with alendronate. All available evidence is reviewed to show that norethisterone acetate, if given in the correct dosage, does not influence serum lipids and lipoproteins in any negative way. It is furthermore shown that norethisterone acetate seems to be superior compared to other progestogens to provide optimum bleeding control and endometrial protection. Also, hormone replacement therapy combinations with norethisterone acetate efficiently alleviate hot flushes. Hormone replacement therapy and the risk of breast cancer and the role of progestogens are discussed.

The synthetic progestin, norethisterone (NET), has been reported as a contragestational postcoital agent in humans, rodents and rabbits. The effect and molecular mechanisms of NET and its A-ring reduced metabolites, 5alpha-NET and 3beta5alpha-NET, on the acrosome reaction (AR) are unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of these compounds on an in vitro progesterone-induced AR in porcine spermatozoa. The spermatozoa were obtained from semen ejaculated by proven fertile adult pigs. Seminal plasma removed and incubated under capacitating conditions was performed in TALP-Hepes medium for 4 h. Progesterone (P4) and three different progestins: norethisterone (NET), 5alpha-norethisterone (5alpha-NET) and 3beta5alpha-NET were then added at equimolar doses, and the spermatozoa were incubated for 15 min. Double-staining with PSA-FITC and Hoechst-33258 assessed the AR and sperm viability. Both P4 and NET induced the AR, while 5alpha-NET not only did not induce this process, but was able to block the effect of P4 on the spermatozoa. 3beta5alpha-NET was not able to inhibit P4 action. These results suggest that NET and its A-ring reduced metabolites act in different ways on the progesterone-induced AR in porcine spermatozoa.