201. Beliefs and Perceptions About Parenteral Nutrition and Hydration by Advanced Cancer Patients
- Author
-
Akiko Abe, Koji Amano, Tatsuya Morita, Tomofumi Miura, Naoharu Mori, Ryohei Tatara, Takaomi Kessoku, Yoshinobu Matsuda, Keita Tagami, Hiroyuki Otani, Masanori Mori, Tomohiko Taniyama, Nobuhisa Nakajima, Erika Nakanishi, Jun Kako, Daisuke Kiuchi, Hiroto Ishiki, Hiromichi Matsuoka, Eriko Satomi, and Mitsunori Miyashita
- Subjects
genetic structures ,Rehabilitation ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,General Medicine ,behavioral disciplines and activities - Abstract
PurposeObjectives of this study are to clarify the beliefs and perceptions of parenteral nutrition and hydration (PNH) by patients with advanced cancer and to examine the relationships between their beliefs and perceptions and cachexia stages.MethodsWe conducted a questionnaire survey. We asked about patient characteristics and anthropometric measurements. We subsequently asked patients to answer 15 items regarding their beliefs and perceptions. The proportions of patients were calculated. Comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. We conducted an explanatory factor analysis and calculated Cronbach’s alpha coefficients to assess the internal consistency. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the independent factors affecting cancer cachexia stages.ResultsAmong 495 patients, 378 responded. Due to missing data, 357 remained in the frequency distribution analysis and explanatory factor analysis, and 344 were classified into the non-cachexia group (n = 174) and cachexia group (n = 170). Approximately 60% of patients thought that PNH were beneficial. Approximately 70% considered PNH as a standard medical practice. Approximately 70% did not feel that they received a sufficient explanation. There were no significant differences in any items between the two groups. We extracted four conceptual groups and Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were 0.87, 0.73, 0.71, and 0.48, respectively. The concept of ‘Belief that PNH are harmful’ was identified as an independent factor [odds ratio 2.57 (95% confidence interval 1.10-6.01), P = 0.030].ConclusionsThis study revealed that patients had a strong preference for receiving PNH with or without cancer cachexia.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF