201. Diagnosing diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients with atrial fibrillation: a clinical challenge.
- Author
-
Beladan CC, Gual-Capllonch F, Popescu AC, and Popescu BA
- Subjects
- Humans, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left diagnostic imaging, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left physiopathology, Female, Male, Diastole, Aged, Heart Failure, Diastolic diagnostic imaging, Heart Failure, Diastolic physiopathology, Risk Assessment, Atrial Fibrillation diagnostic imaging, Atrial Fibrillation physiopathology, Atrial Fibrillation complications, Stroke Volume physiology, Echocardiography methods, Heart Failure diagnostic imaging, Heart Failure physiopathology, Heart Failure complications
- Abstract
Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction, atrial fibrillation (AF), and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) share common risk factors and are closely related to one another and to adverse cardiovascular events. Exertional dyspnoea in patients with AF should trigger a comprehensive LV diastolic function evaluation since AF frequently precedes incident HFpEF. An echocardiographic assessment of LV diastolic function in patients with AF is challenging, mainly because of variability in cycle length, the absence of atrial contraction, and the frequent occurrence of left atrial enlargement regardless of LV filling pressures (LVFPs). The algorithm of the 2016 recommendations for the evaluation of LV diastolic function cannot be directly applied in this setting. This review discusses the modalities available for diastolic function assessment and HFpEF diagnosis in patients with AF. Based on currently available data, a reasonable clinical target of diastolic function evaluation in AF would be to reach a binary conclusion: LVFP elevated or not. Recently, a two-step algorithm that combined several echocardiographic parameters plus the inclusion of body mass index has been proposed to differentiate normal from elevated LVFP in patients with AF. The echocardiographic evaluation must be complemented by a thorough clinical evaluation along with natriuretic peptides and cardiac catheterization in selected cases. If a diagnosis of HFpEF cannot be ascertained, a close follow-up for timely identification of diastolic dysfunction markers, along with monitoring and correction of modifiable risk factors, is recommended., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: B.A.P. has received research support and speaker honoraria from GE Healthcare. C.C.B. has received speaker honoraria from GE Healthcare. A.C.P. and F.G.C. report no conflicts., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF