Search

End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is a common and morbid disease that affects patients' quality and length of life, representing a large portion of health care expenditure in the United States. These patients commonly have associated diabetes and cardiovascular disease, with high rates of cardiovascular-related death. Management of ESKD requires renal replacement therapy via dialysis or transplantation. While transplantation provides the greatest improvement in survival and quality of life, the vast majority of patients are treated initially with hemodialysis. However, outcomes differ significantly among patient populations. Barriers in access to care have particularly affected at-risk populations, such as Black and Hispanic patients. These patients receive less pre-ESKD nephrology care, are less likely to initiate dialysis with a fistula, and wait longer for transplants—even in pediatric populations. Priorities for ESKD care moving into the future include increasing access to nephrology care in underprivileged populations, providing patient-centered care based on each patient's "life plan," and focusing on team-based approaches to ESKD care. This review explores ESKD from the perspective of epidemiology, costs, vascular access, patient-reported outcomes, racial disparities, and the impact of the COVID-19 crisis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Standardized databases such as the Vascular Quality Initiative and National Surgical Quality Improvement Project assess the quality of care related to common vascular surgery procedures, but are not designed for uncommon vascular diseases. We describe a method of assessing uncommon vascular diseases using a multi-institutional collaboration, the Vascular Low Frequency Disease Consortium (VLFDC). Uncommon vascular diseases are identified through a systematic literature review. A disease-specific database is developed and tested at a single institution, then refined and circulated to participating VLFDC investigators. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria and data point definitions are provided, allowing for standardized data collection across institutions. Each participating institution identifies all patients over a specific time period and enters the data into a VLFDC-provided database. The data are then de-identified and transmitted to our centralized data center for analysis. Since 2003, the VLFDC has conducted and published nine studies and enrolled 4532 patients, involving 232 institutions and 271 investigators. The studies include renal artery aneurysms, isolated femoral artery aneurysms, spontaneous mesenteric dissection, adventitial cystic disease, carotid body tumors, and vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Each published study reported on a minimum of 10 times the number of patients collected in previously published studies over the same time period, allowing stronger conclusions to be drawn from the larger sample size. Each study both confirmed previous management principles, which were based on small single-institution experiences, and challenged conventional management paradigms. When only small clinical series exist to provide guidance in managing uncommon vascular diseases, and/or where conflicting recommendations are made on the treatment of uncommon vascular diseases, a multi-institutional consortium can provide high-volume standardized data that either confirm or changes prior management principles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to report the updated results of a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized, single-arm investigational device exemption study conducted at 17 sites in the United States to assess safety and effectiveness of the Zenith Alpha thoracic endovascular graft (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) for treatment of blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI). The primary safety end point was 30-day all-cause mortality and aortic injury-related mortality. The primary effectiveness end point was 30-day device success. Additional outcomes evaluated included major adverse events and imaging findings including aortic injury healing, graft patency, and device integrity as analyzed by the core laboratory on follow-up computed tomography imaging through 5 years. A total of 50 patients with BTAI were enrolled in the TRANSFIX study between January 2013 and May 2014. Mean follow-up was 21 months (range, 0.6-35 months). The 30-day mortality was 2% (n = 1), and it was unrelated to the aortic repair or study device. Five deaths occurred after 30 days, and one was considered procedure related. Freedom from all-cause and BTAI-related mortality was 89.3% and 97.6%, respectively, at 2 years. Aortic injury healing was noted in 96% at 2 years. An incidental finding of thrombus formation within the stent graft, most commonly at the distal aspect of the study device, occurred in 15 patients (30%; 12 by core laboratory, 3 by site) and was confirmed in 13 patients (26%). None of these patients were noted to have clinical sequelae on most recent follow-up. The updated results from the TRANSFIX study continue to show low rates of aortic injury-related mortality and major adverse events during follow-up. However, findings of in-graft thrombus have resulted in the manufacturer's voluntary removal of the BTAI indication for this device. Caution should be exercised in appropriate and accurate device sizing and planning (eg, limiting graft oversizing) as well as in regular, lifelong follow-up evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: End stage kidney disease and hemodialysis dependence are associated with impairments in health-related quality of life (HRQOL), which may be related to vascular access (VA). Few HRQOL measures are VA-specific and none differentiate HRQOL impact by VA type. We developed a VA-targeted HRQOL measure to distinguish the impact of fistulas, grafts and catheters.Methods: We created an initial item pool based on literature review and then conducted focus groups at 4 US sites with 37 adults and interviews with nine dialysis clinicians about VA's impact on HRQOL. We then drafted the Hemodialysis Access-Related Quality of Life (HARQ) measure and cognitively tested it with 17 hemodialysis patients. Focus group and cognitive interview participants were diverse in age, gender, years on dialysis, and VA.Results: We identified six domains for the HARQ: symptoms, physical functioning, emotional impacts, social and role functioning, sleep, and care-related burdens. Cognitive interviews indicated that items were easily understood and supported content validity. Attributing HRQOL impact to VA as opposed to other hemodialysis burden was challenging for some items. Some items were dropped that were considered redundant by patients, limitations while dressing was added, and reference to VA-specific impact was included for each item. The average Flesch-Kincaid reading grade level for the revised 47-item HARQ was 5.3.Conclusions: The HARQ features VA-specific content not addressed in other HRQOL measures, making it ideal for comparisons of different VA types and new VA technologies. The psychometric properties of the HARQ will be evaluated in future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]