Search

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a disease that requires multidisciplinary management. There has been no widely accepted standard for systemic therapy for this disease until recently. This article briefly discusses the management of earlier stage HCC, then focuses on newer agents with promise, particularly sorafenib, a drug that appears to be the new standard of care for advanced disease.

Background and Aims: Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP-L3%) has been reported to be useful in the early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Japan. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the clinical utility of AFP-L3% with that of total AFP in North American patients., Methods: Patients with chronic hepatitis (CH) C virus-related cirrhosis from 7 clinical sites were prospectively followed every 3-6 months for 2 yr., Results: Of the 372 patients evaluated, 40 had hepatitis C virus-related HCC at entry and 332 entered the prospective trial. Of the latter, 34 developed HCC and 298 remained free of HCC. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for AFP were 60.8%, 71.1%, 34.4%, and 88.0% with a cutoff of 20 ng/mL and 21.6%, 98.7%, 80.0%, and 83.5% with a cutoff of 200 ng/mL, compared to 36.5%, 91.6%, 51.9%, and 85.3% for AFP-L3% with a cutoff of 10%. In those with an elevated AFP (20-200 ng/mL), AFP-L3% had a specificity of 86.6% and an NPV of 80.7%. Multivariate analysis identified AFP, AFP-L3%, and age as independent predictors of HCC. Elevated AFP-L3% was associated with a lower cumulative HCC-free rate at 2 yr (58.9%) than was AFP (82.0%, P= 0.01)., Conclusions: The incidence of HCC was significantly higher in patients with elevated AFP-L3% than in those with elevated AFP. The high specificity of AFP-L3% persisted among patients with elevated AFP (20-200 ng/mL) and suggests that AFP-L3% has clinical utility in HCV patients with AFP of 20-200 ng/mL.

Purpose: The optimal strategy for treating locally advanced pancreatic cancer remains controversial, including the respective roles and timing of chemotherapy and radiation. We conducted a Phase II nonrandomized trial to evaluate sequential chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation in this patient population., Methods and Materials: Chemotherapy naive patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated with fixed-dose rate gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) at 10 mg/m(2)/min) plus cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Those without evidence of extrapancreatic metastases after six cycles of chemotherapy received radiation (5,040 cGy over 28 fractions) with concurrent capecitabine (800 mg/m(2) orally twice daily on the day of radiation) as a radiosensitizer., Results: A total of 25 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up time of 656 days. Twelve patients (48%) successfully received all six cycles of chemotherapy plus chemoradiation. Eight patients (32%) progressed during chemotherapy, including 7 with extrapancreatic metastases. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were uncommon. Two patients sustained myocardial infarctions during chemotherapy, and 4 were hospitalized for infectious complications, although none in the setting of neutropenia. Median time to progression was 10.5 months and median survival was 13.5 months, with an estimated 1-year survival rate of 62%. Patients receiving all components of therapy had a median survival of 17.0 months., Conclusions: A strategy of initial fixed-dose rate gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, followed by chemoradiation, shows promising efficacy for treatment of locally advanced disease. A substantial proportion of patients will be identified early on as having extrapancreatic disease and spared the potential toxicities associated with radiation.

A multidisciplinary team is essential for the optimal management of patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. In this article, the systemic and regional nonsurgical therapeutic options for metastatic neuroendocrine cancers are discussed. In particular, the roles of biotherapy, chemotherapy, and hepatic artery embolization/chemoembolization are reviewed. A proposed treatment algorithm is provided with the aim of providing clinicians with a useful framework for managing these challenging patients. Finally, the rationale for promising investigational therapies is described.

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the frequency of hepatic contour abnormalities and signs of portal hypertension at serial CT in patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer metastatic to the liver., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively identified 91 women with breast cancer metastatic to the liver who received chemotherapy and underwent serial CT at our institution between 1998 and 2002. Two readers independently categorized hepatic contour abnormalities on the final CT examination as none, limited retraction, widespread retraction, or diffuse nodularity. Readers also recorded the development of hepatic atrophy or enlargement, ascites, portosystemic collateral veins, and splenomegaly. Interpretative discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Portal hypertension was defined as the presence of at least two of the following CT signs: simple ascites, portosystemic collateral veins, and splenomegaly., Results: After a median follow-up interval of 15 months (range, 1-46), hepatic contour abnormalities were seen in 68 of 91 patients (75%) and consisted of limited retraction (n = 42), widespread retraction (n = 10), or diffuse nodularity (n = 16). Portal hypertension was found in 1 of 23 patients without contour abnormalities, in 1 of 42 patients with limited retraction, in none of 10 patients with widespread retraction, and in 6 of 16 patients with diffuse nodularity (P < .01)., Conclusion: Hepatic contour abnormalities commonly develop at serial CT in patients undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer metastatic to the liver and may be accompanied by signs of portal hypertension; the latter are particularly, but not exclusively, associated with the development of diffuse hepatic nodularity.

Purpose: Endostatin is a 20-kd proteolytic fragment of collagen XVIII that, in preclinical studies, has been shown to have antiangiogenic and antitumor activity. Both preclinical and human phase I studies of recombinant human endostatin (rhEndostatin) suggested activity in neuroendocrine tumors, which are known to be hypervascular. We therefore performed a multicenter phase II study of rhEndostatin in patients with carcinoid or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors., Patients and Methods: Forty-two patients with advanced pancreatic endocrine tumors or carcinoid tumors were treated with rhEndostatin administered as a bid subcutaneous injection at a starting dose of 60 mg/m2/d. Steady-state trough levels were obtained after 6 weeks of therapy; patients who did not achieve a target therapeutic level of 300 ng/mL underwent dose escalation to 90 mg/m2/d. Patients were observed for evidence of toxicity, response, and survival., Results: rhEndostatin was associated with minimal toxicity. However, among 40 patients assessable for radiologic response, none experienced partial response to therapy, as defined by WHO criteria. The median steady-state trough level achieved after dose escalation was 331 ng/mL, within the postulated therapeutic range., Conclusion: Treatment with rhEndostatin did not result in significant tumor regression in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors.

The Chemotherapy Committee of Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) was established in the mid-1970s to assemble a group of experts in cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology who could advise the CALGB disease committees about the optimal use of drugs in the fight against cancer and to provide quality assurance for the chemotherapy section of CALGB protocols. Chaired initially by Edward Henderson and then David Van Echo, the committee was also the repository of studies in diseases for which CALGB did not have a formal committee, such as testis cancer and sarcoma. In 1990, following the appointment of Richard Schilsky as Chair, the name of the committee was changed to the Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (PET) Committee to reflect a more specific focus and scientific agenda (i.e., studies of chemotherapy pharmacology and development of new agents). Three PET Committee reference pharmacology laboratories (led by Merrill Egorin, Tony Miller, and Mark Ratain) were established to measure drug concentrations in biological fluids and to perform pharmacokinetic analyses. In addition, the PET Committee embarked on a number of multi-institution phase I studies. These phase I studies included studies of special populations, including the first prospective study of an anticancer agent (paclitaxel) in patients with hepatic dysfunction. In addition, the Committee studied a number of phase I combinations destined for phase II evaluation in disease-specific committees. Following Dr. Schilsky's election as CALGB Group Chair in 1994, Mark Ratain took over as Chair of the PET Committee and continued to emphasize population pharmacology as the primary theme of the Committee's research agenda. In addition, the PET Committee began to develop novel clinical trial designs, including the first completed randomized discontinuation trial of an antineoplastic agent. Most recently, the PET Committee has launched an ambitious research program in pharmacogenetics, facilitated in large part through the recruitment of Howard McLeod as Vice Chair. This area of research is a collaborative effort with the NIH Pharmacogenetics Research Network and has the potential to definitively address the hypothesis that germ line polymorphisms are a significant determinant of the toxicity and efficacy of anticancer therapy. It is anticipated that the results of the current studies will contribute significantly to the goal of individualizing cancer treatment.

Advances in chemotherapeutic agents have led to improved outcomes for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Chemotherapies, however, are limited by their toxicities and lack of specificity. Aberrations in the regulation and expression of growth factors have been implicated in the development of CRC, and this understanding has led to the development of targeted agents. In 2004, two novel agents, bevacizumab and cetuximab, were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of metastatic CRC. Bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor, and cetuximab, a human-mouse chimeric monoclonal antibody to the epidermal growth factor receptor, have changed the field dramatically. Bevacizumab appears to augment the efficacy of combination chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of metastatic CRC in both the first- and second-line settings, and the role of bevacizumab as part of adjuvant treatment is the subject of ongoing trials. However, because of the increased incidence of serious arterial thromboembolic events, gastrointestinal perforations, bleeding complications, and hypertension associated with bevacizumab, this agent is probably not indicated in all circumstances. Combination treatment with cetuximab and irinotecan appears appropriate in patients with advanced CRC who have failed irinotecan. Patients who are unable to receive additional irinotecan may be treated with cetuximab monotherapy. Positive epidermal growth factor receptor status by immunohistochemistry of a tumor specimen is presently mandated to determine candidacy for this therapy, although this assay appears to be suboptimal and newer assessment techniques to determine suitability for therapy must be developed. Phase III trials should shed light on the role of cetuximab in the first-line metastatic and adjuvant settings. Multitargeted strategies in CRC combining chemotherapy with bevacizumab and cetuximab are currently being explored. Further advances in the treatment of CRC are expected through continued scientific investigation and well-designed clinical trials.

Purpose: Although gemcitabine remains the standard of care for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, additional improvements may be realized by combining therapeutic agents with synergistic activity, and optimizing drug delivery using pharmacokinetic principles such as fixed dose rate (FDR) infusion. The objectives of this study were to determine safety and efficacy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with FDR gemcitabine in combination with low-dose cisplatin., Patients and Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated with a combination of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 at 10 mg/m2/min together with cisplatin 20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Patient follow-up was performed using computerized tomographic scans and serial CA 19-9 measurements., Results: A total of 51 patients were enrolled onto the study, with a median follow-up time of 215 days. Twenty-two of 40 patients (55.0%) with a baseline serum CA 19-9 level > or = 2x the upper limit of normal demonstrated a > or = 50% biomarker decline during treatment. Nine of 47 patients (19.1%) with measurable disease achieved a partial response, and 28 patients (59.6%) had disease stabilization for at least two treatment cycles. Median time to progression was 3.9 months and median survival was 7.1 months, with an estimated 1-year survival rate of 29%. The most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (52.9%) and thrombocytopenia (15.7%). Most patients were switched to an every-other-week dosing schedule., Conclusion: The combination of FDR gemcitabine and cisplatin is well tolerated and appears to be an acceptable, albeit not clearly superior, alternative to other gemcitabine/platinum regimens for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Substantial effort has focused on the development of novel targeted agents for treating patients with late-stage colorectal carcinoma. These agents are designed specifically to inhibit biochemical processes associated with pathogenesis. Numerous molecules targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor have been investigated as therapeutic agents and appear to herald a shift in the treatment paradigm for colorectal carcinoma., (Copyright 2005 American Cancer Society.)

Purpose: Although liver resection is the primary curative therapy for patients with colorectal hepatic metastases, most patients have a recurrence. Identification of molecular markers that predict patients at highest risk for recurrence may help to target further therapy., Experimental Design: Array-based comparative genomic hybridization was used to investigate the association of DNA copy number alterations with outcome in patients with colorectal liver metastasis resected with curative intent. DNA from 50 liver metastases was labeled and hybridized onto an array consisting of 2,463 bacterial artificial chromosome clones covering the entire genome. The total fraction of genome altered (FGA) in the metastases and the patient's clinical risk score (CRS) were calculated to identify independent prognostic factors for survival., Results: An average of 30 +/- 14% of the genome was altered in the liver metastases (14% gained and 16% lost). As expected, a lower CRS was an independent predictor of overall survival (P = 0.03). In addition, a high FGA also was an independent predictor of survival (P = 0.01). The median survival time in patients with a low CRS (score 0-2) and a high (> or =20%) FGA was 38 months compared with 18 months in patients with a low CRS and a low FGA. Supervised analyses, using Prediction Analysis of Microarrays and Significance Analysis of Microarrays, identified a set of clones, predominantly located on chromosomes 7 and 20, which best predicted survival., Conclusions: Both FGA and CRS are independent predictors of survival in patients with resected hepatic colorectal cancer metastases. The greater the FGA, the more likely the patient is to survive.

Preclinical studies have established the pharmacologic advantages of liposomal anthracyclines, including pharmacokinetic profiles after bolus dosing that resemble continuous infusion of conventional anthracyclines, increased drug concentrations in tumor cells compared with the surrounding tissues, and reduced toxicity relative to conventional anthracycline treatment. Based on these studies, many phase I and phase II clinical trials were conducted to assess the safety and potential activity of liposomal anthracyclines in the management of both solid and hematologic tumors. These studies provided valuable insight into the safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil/Caelyx [PLD]), nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet [NPLD]), and liposomal daunorubicin (DaunoXome [DNX]) over a range of doses, either as single-agent therapy or in combination with other cytotoxic agents. Other liposomal anthracyclines in development may be well tolerated but their activity remains to be elucidated by clinical trials. The available data also suggest that liposomal anthracyclines have activity not only against tumor types with known sensitivity to conventional anthracyclines, but also potentially for tumors that are typically anthracycline-resistant. Despite the availability of clinical data from a wide variety of tumor types and patient populations, further studies of liposomal anthracycline therapy are needed to fully establish their safety, efficacy, and dosing in the treatment of these patients.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an extremely diverse and heterogeneous disease and improving patient outcome is a difficult undertaking. While many therapeutic options exist, few have been subjected to rigorous study, so patient benefit is uncertain. Comparative trials need to be performed to determine the value of these and, of course, newer treatments. However, there are numerous challenges to the design and conduct of such studies. While stratification parameters are important in most clinical trials, they are particularly critical when studying HCC. The cancer staging of HCC must reflect prognosis and, therefore, must include parameters of liver disease. This is because the underlying hepatic dysfunction may often determine how long patients survive and confuse the interpretation of anti-HCC treatment trials. Two new staging paradigms--Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) and Chinese University Prognostic Index (CUPI)--have been developed, and these need to be validated. The role of the many different treatment options must be determined. However, the diverse nature of presentation of HCC and the proliferation of many routine procedures--such as chemoembolization or radiofrequency ablation--make controlled trials nearly impossible. Even drug development is a special circumstance, because HCC patients with underlying liver disease may need different dosing regimens and schedules compared to other cancer patients. This makes clinical trial design more cumbersome and the risks of participating in clinical trials for HCC greater. The immense unique challenges of this disease make it imperative for investigators to identify the most promising agents for HCC. At the same time, all patients with HCC should, if possible, be treated on well-designed clinical trials.

Despite recent advances in chemotherapy, including the development of irinotecan and oxaliplatin, survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer remains suboptimal. Thanks to an increased understanding of the biologic basis of cancer, investigators are turning to molecularly targeted therapy to further improve outcome. Current research in colorectal cancer focuses on inhibiting the epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor. Both are essential to tumor growth and frequently over-expressed in colorectal cancer cells. Epidermal growth factor receptor pathways promote survival of tumor cells through cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, adhesion, and transformation and inhibition of apoptosis, whereas the vascular endothelial growth factor is a key mediator of angiogenesis and may have other biologic roles. Recent phase II and III results show the feasibility and activity of inhibiting both by using monoclonal antibodies in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Cetuximab (an epidermal growth factor receptor antibody) plus irinotecan yields an increased overall response in patients with irinotecan-refractory colorectal disease. In previously untreated patients, irinotecan/5-fluoruoracil/leucovorin plus cetuximab also generates an increased overall response rate. Randomized trials of the humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody (rhuMAb vascular endothelial growth factor) plus chemotherapy yielded increased overall response rates and median survival times compared with chemotherapy alone. The primary toxicity of cetuximab is an acneform skin rash; rhuMAb vascular endothelial growth factor causes mild hypertension and may cause perturbations in coagulation. Treatment with either does not appear to exacerbate chemotherapy-related toxicity.

Four patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma were treated with a magnetic targeted carrier bound to doxorubicin (MTC-DOX) by using a joint magnetic resonance (MR) imaging/conventional angiography system consisting of a 1.5-T short-bore magnet connected to a C-arm angiography unit by a sliding tabletop. Selective transcatheter delivery of the MTC-DOX to the hepatic artery was monitored by using intraprocedural MR imaging, and interim catheter manipulation was performed with fluoroscopic guidance to optimize agent delivery to the tumor and minimize delivery to normal tissue. The final fraction of treated tumor volume ranged from 0.64 to 0.91. The fraction of affected normal liver volume ranged from 0.07 to 0.30. The dual MR imaging/conventional angiography system shows promise for directing magnetically targeted tumor therapies., (Copyright RSNA, 2004)

Background: To ascertain if hepatic or renal dysfunction or prior pelvic radiation (XRT) leads to increased toxicity at a given dose of irinotecan and to characterize the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its major metabolites in patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction., Patients and Methods: Adults with tumors appropriate for irinotecan therapy and who had abnormal liver or renal function tests or had prior radiation to the pelvis were eligible. Patients were assigned to one of four treatment cohorts: I, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > or = 3x upper limit of normal and direct bilirubin <1.0 mg/dl; II, direct bilirubin 1.0-7.0 mg/dl; III, creatinine 1.6-5.0 mg/dl with normal liver function; IV, prior pelvic XRT with normal liver and renal function. Starting with reduced doses of either 145 or 225 mg/m(2), irinotecan was administered every 3 weeks to at least three patients within each cohort. Irinotecan and its metabolites in the blood were measured in all patients., Results: Thirty-five patients were evaluable for toxicity. No dose-limiting toxicity was seen in cohort I, although only three patients were treated and at a dose of 225 mg/m(2). Patients with elevations of direct bilirubin had dose-limiting toxicities, even though the starting dose was 145 mg/m(2). These same patients appeared to have comparable exposure to the active metabolite SN-38 as normal patients treated with full-dose irinotecan. Patients with elevations of creatinine or with prior pelvic radiotherapy did not appear to have increased risk of toxicity at the doses explored in this study., Conclusions: Patients with elevated bilirubin treated with irinotecan have an increased risk of toxicity and a dose reduction is recommended. Patients with elevated AST, creatinine or prior pelvic radiation do not appear to have increased sensitivity to irinotecan, but the data are not adequate to support a specific dosing recommendation.

Liver metastases nearly always represent disseminated cancer, and systemic therapies designed for controlling systemic tumors are usually indicated. However, in a minority of patients with colorectal cancer, management of the metastatic hepatic disease will be clinically important and even curative. This review discusses novel treatment approaches that may be indicated in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases, including the potential use of systemic therapy as part of multimodality therapy in an effort to cure selected patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Despite important refinements of surgical technique and significant progress in perioperative care, esophageal cancer remains highly lethal. Therefore, hope for improvement in the prognosis of esophageal cancer lies largely in the use of additional therapy. Promising data from numerous Phase II trials and a single Phase III trial led to the widespread adoption of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, subsequent randomized trials did not conclusively demonstrate a survival benefit with any of the current neoadjuvant protocols for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Benefit, if any, exists only for complete pathologic responders. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation should not be used in patients with resectable esophageal cancer outside of the clinical trials. Future investigation must focus on the development of new biologic or chemotherapeutic agents, and the identification of biologic markers that might predict response to chemoradiation.

Liver metastases nearly always represent disseminated cancer, and systemic therapies are usually indicated. However, in a minority of patients--some with colorectal cancer, others with selected tumors--management of the hepatic disease may be clinically important and even curative. This review identifies unique patient subgroups and novel treatment approaches that may be indicated in patients with liver metastases.

Early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is feasible, particularly in patients known to be at risk from chronic hepatitis and chronic liver disease. The optimal surveillance strategy is unknown. HCC usually presents as an incurable disease even when detected on surveillance. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice, but the coexistence of chronic liver disease and the insidious nature of HCC make it unresectable in most patients. Orthotopic liver transplantation for selected patients or ablative techniques may offer an opportunity to render patients disease-free even if the tumor is unresectable. There are numerous therapies offered to patients with unresectable HCC, including chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and regional intra-arterial treatments. While potentially palliative, none of these approaches has been demonstrated to prolong survival in these patients. If possible, the treatment of patients with HCC should be done on clinical trials.

Purpose: To ascertain if hepatic or renal dysfunction leads to increased toxicity at a given dose of gemcitabine and to characterize the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and its major metabolite in patients with such dysfunction., Patients and Methods: Adults with tumors appropriate for gemcitabine therapy and who had abnormal liver or renal function tests were eligible. Patients were assigned to one of three treatment cohorts: I-AST level less than or equal to two times normal and bilirubin level less than 1.6 mg/dL; II-bilirubin level 1.6 to 7.0 mg/dL; and III-creatinine level 1.6 to 5.0 mg/dL with normal liver function. Doses were explored in at least three patients within each cohort. Gemcitabine and its metabolite were to be measured in the blood in all patients., Results: Forty patients were assessable for toxicity. Transient transaminase elevations were observed in many patients but were not dose limiting. Patients with AST elevations tolerated gemcitabine without increased toxicity, but patients with elevated bilirubin levels had significant deterioration in liver function after gemcitabine therapy. Patients with elevated creatinine levels had significant toxicity even at reduced doses of gemcitabine, including two instances of severe skin toxicity. There were no apparent pharmacokinetic differences among the three groups or compared with historical controls., Conclusion: If gemcitabine is used for patients with elevations in AST level, no dose reduction is necessary. Patients with elevated bilirubin levels have an increased risk of hepatic toxicity, and a dose reduction is recommended. Patients with elevated creatinine levels seem to have increased sensitivity to gemcitabine, but the data are not adequate to support a specific dosing recommendation.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a disease that is extremely difficult to manage and is increasing markedly in incidence. This presents both an opportunity and a challenge. At-risk patients can be identified and early detection of HCC is feasible. New surgical techniques and postoperative therapies, including hepatic intra-arterial radiation, may improve the outlook for some patients with resectable cancer. Unfortunately, the vast majority of patients with HCC will have unresectable cancers. Regional treatments may shrink or necrose tumors, but no clear benefit to such therapies has been demonstrated. Recent evidence suggests combination chemotherapy may help some patients, although this needs validation. Perhaps the best hope is that the further elucidation of the genetic and molecular features of HCC will lend us insight into innovative strategies to manage this difficult cancer.

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a common, difficult-to-treat cancer that has a variable natural history depending on patient demographics and the etiology and extent of underlying liver disease. Resection is the preferred treatment option but is only possible in the rare patient who has adequate hepatic reserve and limited-stage cancer. Systemic chemotherapy is mostly inactive. Because most patients with hepatocellular cancer succumb to hepatic failure, this is a disease that appears to be amenable to regional treatments. For this reason, numerous intratumoral, ablative techniques are available. Other routinely used regional treatment modalities include intraarterial chemotherapy, chemoembolization, Lipiodol chemoembolization, and internal radiation. However, the benefits of these interventions have been difficult to ascertain given the variable clinical course of the disease. Regional delivery may prove to be most valuable as a route for administering newer agents.

Background: The use of surgically implanted chemoinfusion pumps for the treatment of hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma can be complicated by intra- or extrahepatic misperfusion. This may result in suboptimal tumor exposure to the chemotherapeutic agent and injury to other gastrointestinal organs. Misperfusion can be managed by selective arterial transcatheter embolization., Methods: Between 1989 and 1996, 16 patients with liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma and with hepatic artery chemoinfusion pump misperfusion were treated using transcatheter coil embolization. Six female and 10 male patients (age range, 34-84 years; median, 51.5 years) were identified by retrospective review of the records of the Department of Interventional Radiology. After pump placement, abnormal liver perfusion scan or methylene blue endoscopy study results prompted angiography with coil embolization. After embolization, the imaging studies were repeated and patients were monitored in the Oncology Clinic., Results: Eight patients exhibited intrahepatic misperfusion (group 1) and eight extrahepatic misperfusion (group 2). Coil embolization was immediately successful in 100% of patients in group 1, with restoration of normal hepatic perfusion, and in 75% in group 2. There were no immediate procedure-related complications. Follow-up periods ranged from 1 to 23 months (median, 13.5 months). Embolization was unsuccessful for two patients (in group 2), who tolerated a modified chemotherapeutic regimen, with follow-up periods of 18.5 and 22 months., Conclusions: Transcatheter coil embolization is the therapy of choice for the management of hepatic artery chemoinfusion pump misperfusion. It is rapid, effective, and well tolerated by patients and obviates the need for additional surgical intervention.

Purpose: Subcutaneous (SC) octreotide acetate effectively relieves the diarrhea and flushing associated with carcinoid syndrome but requires long-term multiple injections daily. A microencapsulated long-acting formulation (LAR) of octreotide acetate has been developed for once-monthly intramuscular dosing., Patients and Methods: A randomized trial compared double-blinded octreotide LAR at 10, 20, and 30 mg every 4 weeks with open-label SC octreotide every 8 hours for the treatment of carcinoid syndrome. Seventy-nine patients controlled with treatment of SC octreotide 0.3 to 0.9 mg/d whose symptoms returned during a washout period and who returned for at least the week 20 evaluation constituted the efficacy-assessable population., Results: Complete or partial treatment success was comparable in each of the four arms of the study (SC, 58.3%; 10 mg, 66.7%; 20 mg, 71.4%; 30 mg, 61.9%; P> or =.72 for all pairwise comparisons). Control of stool frequency was similar in all treatment groups. Flushing episodes were best controlled in the 20-mg LAR and SC groups; the 10-mg LAR treatment was least effective in the control of flushing. Treatment was well tolerated by patients in all four groups., Conclusion: Once octreotide steady-state concentrations are achieved, octreotide LAR controls the symptoms of carcinoid syndrome at least as well as SC octreotide. A starting dose of 20 mg of octreotide LAR is recommended. Supplemental SC octreotide is needed for approximately 2 weeks after initiation of octreotide LAR treatment. Occasional rescue SC injections may be required for possibly 2 to 3 months until steady-state octreotide levels from the LAR formulation are achieved.

Neuroendocrine tumors, particularly those of gastrointestinal tract origin, have a predisposition for metastasizing to the liver. In such patients, the clinical course is often dominated by the hepatic disease, either because of hormone secretion or because of tumor bulk. Because the liver has a dual vascular supply and hepatic metastases derive the majority of blood from the hepatic artery, the regional delivery of chemotherapy can offer pharmacokinetic advantages over systemic administration. The hepatic artery is also a nonsurgical avenue for inducing selective metastasis ischemia by the embolization of tumor vessels. The combination of these two therapies, or chemoembolization, may provide additive benefits. Such an approach has been demonstrated to reduce tumor bulk, reduce hormone levels, and palliate the symptoms of many patients with liver-dominant neuroendocrine metastases. Embolization or chemoembolization is an appropriate modality for some patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

Tamoxifen, a non-steroidal anti-estrogen, has been used successfully for a decade as post-operative adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Tamoxifen is generally well tolerated with few side effects, especially at the typical dose of 10 mg twice daily. However, hepatic effects have been reported after tamoxifen administration and are usually found to be cholestatic in nature. Although previous reports concentrate on tamoxifen as a probable cause of drug-induced hepatotoxicity, very little attention has been focused on the use of tamoxifen in patients with pre-existing liver dysfunction and the possible need for dose adjustment. We present the case of a 48-year-old woman with an acute exacerbation of her pre-existing liver dysfunction and subsequent elevations of tamoxifen blood levels after approximately one year of tamoxifen therapy for adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Tamoxifen dosing was adjusted based on serum levels.

Purpose: To characterize the maximum-tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in patients with abnormal liver function., Patients and Methods: Adults with tumors appropriate for paclitaxel therapy who had abnormal liver function tests were eligible. Patients were assigned to one of three treatment cohorts: I, AST level twofold normal and bilirubin level less than 1.5 mg/dL; II, bilirubin level 1.6 to 3.0 mg/dL; and III, bilirubin level greater than 3.0 mg/dL. Doses were explored in at least three patients within each cohort. Although designed to assess a 24-hour infusion schedule, the trial was extended to also assess a 3-hour regimen. Pharmacokinetics were to be studied in all patients., Results: Eighty-one patients were assessable for toxicity. Patients with bilirubin levels greater than 1.5 mg/dL had substantial toxicity at all doses explored, whereas the toxicity for patients with elevated AST levels occurred at doses that ranged from 50 to 175 mg/m2 administered over 24 hours. In most patients, the DLT was myelosuppression. The pharmacokinetic data were insufficient to adequately evaluate the relationship between pharmacokinetics and toxicity in patients who received 24-hour infusions but provided evidence of a longer exposure to paclitaxel than anticipated for the doses used in this study in the 3-hour infusion group., Conclusion: If paclitaxel is used for patients with elevated levels of AST or bilirubin, dose reductions are necessary, and an increase in toxicity can be anticipated. The increased myelosuppression observed is at least partially because of altered paclitaxel pharmacokinetics in such patients.

The use of hepatic intra-arterial (HIA) chemotherapy is based on the pharmacologic principle that the regional administration of certain drugs can lead to higher drug concentrations at the site of a tumor. This has been studied most extensively in patients with liver-only colorectal metastases. Four large randomized studies have failed to demonstrate a survival advantage of regional treatment over systemic chemotherapy, although two meta-analyses confirmed an improvement in response rate and suggest a trend toward improvement in survival. Two randomized studies have shown improved survival in patients treated with HIA chemotherapy, as compared with those given supportive care, and quality of life also appears to be superior in HIA chemotherapy recipients. The treatment employed in all of the randomized studies was hindered by substantial hepatobiliary toxicity and many surgical complications. Improved surgical techniques and newer chemotherapy combinations appear to have improved phase II results with HIA therapy, leading to a randomized trial now being conducted by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB). The role of HIA chemotherapy in adjuvant settings and in other diseases has not been as well-studied, and such uses remain appropriate only for very selected patients. Ultimately, the regional advantage gained by the HIA route may prove to be most advantageous for the delivery of newer biologic agents.

This report describes an intra-abdominal desmoplastic small round-cell tumor in a 29-year-old man that significantly differed from the classically described appearances of this unique tumor. It showed extensive papillary areas, no necrosis, and very little desmoplasia. The latter was limited, paucicellular, and present in areas separate from the papillary structures. Also, areas of back-to-back, single-cell infiltration, which mimicked lobular breast carcinoma, were present. These epithelial features suggested the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma or peculiar mesothelioma. But, the immunohistochemical features (tumor cells positive for keratin, desmin, and vimentin) were more consistent with an intra-abdominal desmoplastic small round-cell tumor. The diagnosis became clear after application of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction techniques to formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue, which showed the presence of a 100-base pair product containing the fusion junction of Ewing's sarcoma-1 exon 7 to Wilms' tumor-1 exon 8. This feature is considered unique to intra-abdominal desmoplastic small round-cell tumors. This case illustrates the less common histologic findings that can be found in intra-abdominal desmoplastic small round-cell tumor. This deviation from the classic histologic findings may be an expression of an uncommon morphologic variant and/or partially produced by the effects of prior chemotherapy. In either event, only by illustrating the various histologic appearances of intra-abdominal desmoplastic small round-cell tumor are the chances increased for the accurate diagnosis of this aggressive neoplasm with a poor prognosis.

There are pharmacologic principles that make regional chemotherapy to the liver a logical treatment strategy. Patients with colorectal liver metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma would appear to be the best candidates for such an approach. Although there are many objective responses to such treatment, survival benefit has not been demonstrated, but new regimens and refined techniques appear to be improving results. Ultimately, regional delivery may be best suited for innovative treatments such as biologicals and gene therapies.