Search

This 96-week, randomized, open-label study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of two single-tablet regimens in treatment naïve HIV-1-infected adults: rilpivirine (RPV) + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) and efavirenz (EFV) + FTC/TDF. Assessments included patient-reported Medication Adherence Self-Report Inventory, SF-12v2 Quality of Life assessment, HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, and HIV Symptom Index Questionnaire through Week 48. Additional evaluations included study drug discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). A total of 786 participants (n=394 RPV/FTC/TDF, n=392 EFV/FTC/TDF) were included. Fewer RPV/FTC/TDF-treated than EFV/FTC/TDF-treated participants discontinued study drug due to TEAEs (2.5% vs. 8.7%), with 41% (14/34) TEAE-related discontinuations in the EFV/FTC/TDF group occurring within the first four weeks of treatment. Treatment adherence and satisfaction remained high through Week 48 and quality of life improved from baseline in both groups. There were no significant between-group differences in virologic success (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) regardless of adherence (<95% or ≥95%). Significant between-group differences favouring RPV/FTC/TDF were observed for the HIV SIQ symptoms of difficulty falling or staying asleep (p = .022) and diarrhea or loose bowel movements (p = .002). In conclusion, 48-week treatment with RPV/FTC/TDF or EFV/FTC/TDF was associated with high adherence, high treatment satisfaction, and improved quality of life. TEAE-related discontinuations and patient-reported symptoms indicate that RPV/FTC/TDF may be somewhat better tolerated than EFV/FTC/TDF. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Introduction: BICSTaR (GS-EU-380-4472/GS-CA-380-4574/GS-IL-380- 5335) is an ongoing, multinational, observational cohort study evaluating real-world effectiveness and safety of B/F/TAF in ART naïve (TN) and ARTexperienced (TE) PLWH. Materials and Methods: This 12M pooled analysis included PLWH starting B/F/TAF in clinical practice from June 2018 to September 2020 (latterly during the COVID-19 pandemic) in Europe/Israel/Canada. Outcomes included virological effectiveness (HIV‐1 RNA <50 copies/ml [missing=excluded]), persistence, drug‐related adverse events (DRAEs), and laboratory parameters. Results: One-thousand one hundred thirty-five PLWH were included (Table 1). The TE group had older median age than TN. Of TE participants, 65%/20%/16% switched from INSTI/NNRTI/PI-based regimens (36% TDF/46% TAF/13% ABC); 12% had prior virologic failure. Baseline resistance was documented in 124/535 participants (NRTI/NNRTI/PI/ INSTI=6%/6%/3%/0.2%). Prevalence of comorbidities (47%/72% TN/TE) and concomitant medication usage was high. At 12M, 97% (149/154) of TN and 96% (771/800) of TE participants had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml, and persistence on B/F/TAF was high [91% (1032/1135)]. In a multivariable analysis, TE participants with neuropsychiatric disorder ongoing at baseline had lower odds for viral suppression (odds ratio=0.45, 95% CI: 0.21-0.96). There was no emergence of resistance to the components of B/F/TAF. DRAEs occurred in 13% (148/1135) of participants; gastrointestinal and neuropsychiatric DRAEs were the most common (3% each). Discontinuations due to DRAEs were low (TN 4%; TE 6%). Serious DRAEs were rare (0.2%; 2 TE participants with depression). Lipidchanges are shown (Figure 1). Conclusion: B/F/TAF was associated with high levels of effectiveness and persistence after 12M in this large real-world cohort of TN and TE PLWH with a high comorbidity burden. Effectiveness was demonstrated across key subgroups (females, older participants, late presenters). Importantly, there were no new or unexpected safety findings. Collectively, these real-world data continue to support the use of B/F/TAF in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: BICSTaR is an ongoing, multinational, observational cohort study evaluating B/F/TAF in ART therapy-naïve (TN) and ART-experienced (TE) PLWH. The BICSTaR population has a high baseline prevalence of comorbidities (particularly neuropsychiatric). PROs were prospectively collected. Materials and Methods: One hundred eighty TN/955 TE participants were considered for the 12M analysis (cut-off Feb 2021, including people enrolled from Jun 2018 to Sept 2020, i.e. partially during the COVID19 pandemic). PRO measures: Adherence [visual analogue scale (VAS)]; physical/mental health [short form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire: Aggregated physical/mental component summary (PCS/MCS) scores; HIV-symptom index (HIV-SI; symptoms dichotomised into bothersome/not bothersome); HIV treatment satisfaction questionnaire (HIVTSQ; TE only); physician visits. VAS/SF-36/HIV-SI: Analysis population restricted to participants with questionnaires completed at both baseline/12M. SF-36/HIV-SI/HIVTSQ were described for participants with/without prior/ongoing neuropsychiatric comorbidities (TE only as TN subgroup was small). Results: Adherence to treatment was high at baseline (TE) and was maintained at 12M after switch to B/F/TAF [Table 1 (T1)]. Statistically significant improvements in PCS/MCS scores were observed in TN participants at 12M (p<0.05); scores remained stable in TE participants (Figure 1). The medyan (Q1, Q3) number of bothersome symptoms in TN participants declined from 6 (2, 9) at baseline to 2 (0, 6) at 12M (p<0.001; T1); TE, no change in absolute count. Statistically significant reductions in the frequency of several bothersome symptoms were reported in TN participants (p<0.05) (TE: No statistically significant changes). Treatment satisfaction was high at baseline (TE), with improvements observed at 12M following switch to B/F/TAF (p<0.001) (T1). Physician visits are shown (T1). In TE participants with baseline prior/ongoing neuropsychiatric comorbidities [275/955 (29%)], similar PRO trends were seen. Conclusion: In this real-world cohort of PLWH with a high prevalence of comorbidities (and in the setting of a global pandemic), patient-reported adherence, physical/mental health, bothersome symptoms, and treatment satisfaction were maintained/showed improvements during 12M of B/F/ TAF treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As a result of agribusiness in Australia and across the world, water is contaminated with nutrients and pesticides which threaten riverine environments, wetlands, urban drinking water supplies and also marine assets such as the Great Barrier Reef (GBR). Much can be done and sustainable management practices (SMP) can be put into place to reduce water impacts from agriculture. Required investment levels are insignificant compared to the economic advantages to be gained from adopting appropriate SMP across Australian and global agribusiness. SMP technologies need to be targeted at specific pesticides (eg. atrazine, simazine, diruron, ametryn, hexazinone, tebuthiuron, dieldrin, metalochlor, 2,4 D, triclopyr, picloram and bromacil). Surface runoff from agricultural enterprises is conventionally managed by retention lagoons facilitating water reuse on-farm, but these can be breached during heavy storms. Long term deep drainage from fields and seepage from lagoons can also lead to contaminated groundwater. Research, development and testing of appropriate non-leaking/reactive spillways and subsurface geostructures needs to take place across the various agricultural industries. For surface water it is suggested that spillways could be designed with replaceable biochar baffles, and for groundwater, trenches of biochar could form Permeable Reactive Barriers (PRB). The potential for green or brown waste material derived biochar products, which could be readily manufactured from farm refuse and manure, needs to be thoroughly investigated in this regard. The challenge for engineers is to come up with geostructural designs which are efficient, cost effective and which will be taken up and embraced by Australian and world agribusiness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]