201. Thermoeconomic and optimization analyses of direct oxy-combustion supercritical carbon dioxide power cycles with dry and wet cooling.
- Author
-
Sleiti, Ahmad K., Al-Ammari, Wahib A., Vesely, Ladislav, and Kapat, Jayanta S.
- Subjects
- *
COMBUSTION , *SUPERCRITICAL carbon dioxide , *WASTE heat , *THERMAL efficiency , *CARBON dioxide - Abstract
• Wet and dry cooling for three direct oxy-fuel sCO 2 power cycles are compared. • Energy, exergy, economic and multi-objective optimization analyses are conducted. • The preheater integration improves the efficiency by 13.27% (wet), and 6.58% (dry) • The overall efficiency of the wet cycle (72.04%) is higher than the dry (70.55%) • The LCOE of the improved cycle is lower by 19.1% (wet), and 11.4% (dry) • A minimum LCOE of 4.67¢/kWh e is obtained for wet and 6.14¢/kWh e for dry cycles. Oxy-combustion supercritical CO 2 power cycles have the advantages of high-energy efficiency and near-zero pollutant emissions. Thus, these cycles are considered as an efficient way to reduce CO 2 emissions while maintaining economic growth. The major drawbacks of this technology include the lack of validated levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) studies; lower turbine inlet temperatures studies to accommodate the integration of various energy sources; solutions for the thermodynamic imbalance of the regenerator; and investigating the dry- versus the wet-cooling methods. These drawbacks are addressed in this paper by presenting comprehensive thermoeconomic and optimization analyses for three direct oxy-fuel sCO 2 power cycles in wet and dry-cooling conditions. The first cycle M1 is a direct oxy-fuel sCO 2 power cycle without preheater, the second cycle M2 integrates a preheater in parallel with the low-temperature recuperator of M1 while the third cycle M3 integrates a preheater in parallel with the high and low-temperature recuperators of M1. Results show that the integration of the preheater improves the thermal efficiency of M2 by 5.81% (wet), and 3.27% (dry), and of M3 by 13.27% (wet), and 6.58% (dry). The LCOE of M1 (without preheater) is higher than that of M2 by 10.8% (wet), and 5.7% (dry), and of M3 by 19.1% (wet), and 11.4% (dry). A minimum LCOE of 4.667¢/kWh e is obtained for M3 (wet) and of 6.139¢/kWh e for M3 (dry). At higher waste heat source temperature of 700 °C, the overall efficiency is improved by an average of 11% and the LCOE is reduced by 1.43 ¢/kWh e. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF