The additive reduct of a band semiring is a regular band. We refer to [1] and [2] for a general background on semigroups, and on bands in particular. A semiring (S,+, ·) is said to be an idempotent semiring if both the reducts (S,+) and (S, ·) are bands. Green’s D [L-, R-] relation on the additive reduct (S,+) will be denoted by + D [ + L , + R ]. It is easy to see that if (S,+, ·) is an idempotent semiring, then + D is a semiring congruence, whereas + L induces a congruence on the multiplicative reduct (S, ·) (see also [3]). An idempotent semiring (S,+, ·) is said to be a band semiring if + D is the least (distributive) lattice congruence on S , or equivalently, if S satisfies the identities x+ xy + x ≈ x ≈ x+ yx+ x (see Theorem 2.2 of [3]). We shall show that the additive reduct of a band semiring is a regular band. We shall use the fact that a band is regular if and only if the Green’s relations L and R are congruence relations (see Section II.3 of [2]). Lemma. Let (S,+) be a band. The Green’s relation L is not a congrence relation on S if and only if S contains either a subband isomorphic to E1 or ∗The research is supported by an NSF(China) grant #10471112. The research of the first author is supported by a grant of the Youth Scintific Research Foundation of Southwest Normal University (#SWNUQ2004003). 440 Wang, Zhou, and Guo a subband isomorphic to E2 , where E1 and E2 are respectively given by + a b c d e a a a c d e b b b c d e c d e c d e d d d c d e e e e c d e and + a b c d e f g h a a a c d e c d e b b b f g h f g h c d e c d e c d e d d d c d e c d e e e e c d e c d e f g h f g h f g h g g g f g h f g h h h h f g h f g h . Proof. The Green’s relation L on the band S is not a congruence if and only if there exist a, b, k ∈ S such that aLb but k+a is not L-related to k+ b . If this is the case, then with c = a + k , the subband of S generated by a, b and c is isomorphic to E1 if c = b + c , and is isomorphic to E2 if c = b + c . Conversely, if S contains a subband isomorphic to E1 or E2 , then obviously the L-relation is not a congruence on S . Theorem. The additive reduct of a band semiring is a regular band. Proof. Let (S,+, ·) be a band semiring. Using the Lemma and duality, it suffices to show that the band (S,+) cannot contain a subband isomorphic to E1 or E2 . (1) Suppose that (S,+) has a subband T isomorphic to E1 . We identify T with E1 . First we have a = a+ ac+ a = a(a+ c+ a) = ad. Since a + Lb and + L is a congruence on (S, ·), we have a + Lab . Then a = ad = a(b+ d) = ab+ ad = ab+ a = ab. Since + D is a lattice congruence we have that ab + Dcb in S . So we have b = b+ db+ b = (b+ d+ b)b = db = (a+ c+ a)b = ab+ cb+ ab = ab = a, a contradiction. Therefore (S,+) has no subband isomorphic to E1 . (2) Suppose S has a subband T isomorphic to E2 and we identify T with E2 . First we have a = a+ ae+ a = a(a+ e+ a) = ae and b = b+ gb+ b = (b+ g + b)b = gb. Wang, Zhou, and Guo 441 Since + D is a lattice congruence, we obtain that ab + Ddb + Dah . So we have ab = ab+ db+ ab = (a+ d+ a)b = db and ab = ab+ ah+ ab = a(b+ h+ b) = ah. Thus, noticing that ac + Dcb + Dab , we have (c+ a)(c+ b) = (c+ a)c+ (c+ a)b = c+ ac+ cb+ ab = c+ (ac+ ab) = c+ a(c+ b) = c+ ae = c+ a = d and (c+ a)(c+ b) = c(c+ b) + a(c+ b) = c+ cb+ ac+ ab = c+ (cb+ ab) = c+ (c+ a)b = c+ db = c+ ab. Therefore we have c + ab = d . Similarly, applying the distributive law to (f+a)(f+b), one can get f+ab = h in combination with b = gb and ab = ah . Thus we obtain that d = c+ ab = (a+ f) + ab = a+ (f + ab) = a+ h = e, a contradiction. So S has no subband isomorphic to E2 either. Thus the proof is complete. Note 1. Let (S, ·) be a band and define an addition by: for a, b ∈ S, a = a + b . Then (S,+, ·) is a band semiring. Thus, any band is isomorphic to the multiplicative reduct of some band semiring. Note 2. The additive reduct of a band semiring need not be a normal band: see the example following Construction 3.5 of [3]. Note 3. For a band semiring S , the relation + L is a semiring congruence. From this and its dual it follows that S is a subdirect product of the semirings S/ + L and S/ + R . 442 Wang, Zhou, and Guo Acknowledgment The authors would like to thank Professor Francis Pastijn for his valuable suggestions and help. References [1] Howie, J. M., “Fundamentals of Semigroup Theory”, Clarendon Press, Ox- ford, 1995. [2] Petrich, M., “Lectures in Semigroups”, Akad. Berlag, Berlin, 1977. [3] Sen, M. K., Guo, Y. Q. and Shum, K. P., A class of idempotent semirings, Semigroup Forum 60 (2000), 351–367. Department of Mathematics Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin (150001), China Department of Mathematics Southwest China University Chongqing (400715), China zpwang@swu.edu.cn Department of Mathematics Jiangxi Normal University Nanchang (330027), China ylzhou185@163.com Department of Mathematics Southwest China University Chongqing (400715) China yqguo259@swu.edu.cn Received November 7, 2004 and in final form August 19, 2005 Online publication January 23, 2006