Search

Background: Few studies on multiple sclerosis (MS) have explored the variability of percentage brain volume change (PBVC) measurements obtained from different clinical MRIs. In a retrospective multicentre cohort study, we quantified the variability of annualised PBVC in clinical MRIs., Methods: Clinical MRIs of relapse-onset MS patients were assessed by icobrain. Volumetric data were analysed on same-scanner and different-scanner MRI pairs if they passed quality control criteria. Alignment similarity between two images had to be comparable to same-scanner scan-rescan images., Results: Of 6826 MRIs, 85 % had appropriate volumetric sequences and 4446 serial MRI pairs were analysed. 3334 (75 %) MRI pairs from 1207 patients met the inclusions. The PBVC of included MRI pairs showed variance of 0.78 % for same-scanner pairs and 0.80 % for different-scanner pairs. Further selection of included MRI pairs with the best variance resulted in 1885 (42 %) MRI pairs with PBVC variance of 0.34 %. Excluded MRI pairs with poor alignment similarity had variances of 2.97 % for same-scanner pairs and 20.79 % for different-scanner pairs., Conclusion: Icobrain should be utilised for PBVC determination only on selected MRIs with the best alignment similarity. Applying strict selection criteria for the included MRI pairs and longitudinal imaging on the same scanner remain mandatory to reduce PBVC variability., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Wim Van Hecke reports a relationship with Icometrix NV that includes: board membership and equity or stocks. Diana M. Sima reports a relationship with Icometrix NV that includes: employment. Guy Nagels reports a relationship with Icometrix NV that includes: consulting or advisory and equity or stocks. Femke Podevyn reports a relationship with Icometrix NV that includes: employment. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background and Objectives: In patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), thalamic atrophy occurs during the disease course. However, there is little understanding of the mechanisms leading to volume loss and of the relationship between microstructural thalamic pathology and disease progression. This cross-sectional and longitudinal study aimed to comprehensively characterize in vivo pathologic changes within thalamic microstructure in PwMS using advanced multiparametric quantitative MRI (qMRI)., Methods: Thalamic microstructural integrity was evaluated using quantitative T1, magnetization transfer saturation, multishell diffusion, and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in 183 PwMS and 105 healthy controls (HCs). The same qMRI protocol was available for 127 PwMS and 73 HCs after a 2-year follow-up period. Inclusion criteria for PwMS encompassed either an active relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) or inactive progressive MS (PMS) disease course. Thalamic alterations were compared between PwMS and HCs and among disease phenotypes. In addition, the study investigated the relationship between thalamic damage and clinical and conventional MRI measures of disease severity., Results: Compared with HCs, PwMS exhibited substantial thalamic alterations, indicative of microstructural and macrostructural damage, demyelination, and disruption in iron homeostasis. These alterations extended beyond focal thalamic lesions, affecting normal-appearing thalamic tissue diffusely. Over the follow-up period, PwMS displayed an accelerated decrease in myelin volume fraction [mean difference in annualized percentage change ( MD-ApC ) = -1.50; p = 0.041] and increase in quantitative T1 ( MD-ApC = 0.92; p < 0.0001) values, indicating heightened demyelinating and neurodegenerative processes. The observed differences between PwMS and HCs were substantially driven by the subgroup with PMS, wherein thalamic degeneration was significantly accelerated, even in comparison with patients with RRMS. Thalamic qMRI alterations showed extensive correlations with conventional MRI, clinical, and cognitive disease burden measures. Disability progression over follow-up was associated with accelerated thalamic degeneration, as reflected by enhanced diffusion ( β = -0.067; p = 0.039) and QSM ( β = -0.077; p = 0.027) changes. Thalamic qMRI metrics emerged as significant predictors of neurologic and cognitive disability even when accounting for other established markers including white matter lesion load and brain and thalamic atrophy., Discussion: These findings offer deeper insights into thalamic pathology in PwMS, emphasizing the clinical relevance of thalamic damage and its link to disease progression. Advanced qMRI biomarkers show promising potential in guiding interventions aimed at mitigating thalamic neurodegenerative processes.

Background: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the treatment effects of immunotherapies in subgroups of adults with clinically isolated syndrome or relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) and the effect of potential treatment effect modifiers (TEMs)., Methods: Phase 2 and 3 RCTs with a placebo comparator were analyzed. Risk of bias was assessed. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to summarize treatment effects within subgroups and differences in treatment effects between subgroups., Results: Thirty-one studies were included. Age < 40 years was the strongest TEM for relapse rate across DMTs with a ratio of rate ratios (RRR) of 1.44 (95% CI 1.09-1.90; 7 studies). Disability progression was influenced by age (ratio of hazard ratios, RHR 1.59, 95% CI 1.11-2.29; 4 studies). Dichotomizing patients based on EDSS cut-offs (EDSS 2.0 and 3.0) also showed a significantly higher benefit for those less disabled for relapse rate (RRR 1.35, CI 1.03-1.76; 8 studies). Sex, baseline MRI parameters, previous immunotherapy, and clinical presentation showed no effect in this meta-analysis., Conclusion: Age < 40 is a robust TEM for a lower relapse rate as well as less disability progression across six MS immunotherapies. Additionally, a lower baseline EDSS was predictive of the relapse rate., Competing Interests: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: JR: has received honoraria for consultancy from Mylan, Novartis and Sanofi-Aventis and compensation for lectures and educational presentations from, Merck- Serono, Novartis, Teva, and Sanofi-Aventis DC: is a consultant for Biogen and Hoffmann-La Roche. In the last three years he has received research funding from Hoffmann-La Roche, the International Progressive MS Alliance, the MS Society, and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals (UCLH) Biomedical Research Centre, and speaker's honorarium from Novartis. He co-supervises a clinical fellowship at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, which is supported by Merck. MPS: has received Grants (Roche, Novartis, Biogen), Fees for educational events and lectures (Roche, Novartis, Biogen, Merck, Sanofi, Celgene), Support for travelling and participation to meetings (Roche, Novartis, Biogen, Merck, Sanofi, Celgene), Payment for participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board, Advisory Board, or Guideline Panel (Roche, Novartis, Biogen, Merck, Sanofi, Celgene, GeNeuro, Medday), and that they have been involved in conducting a study funded by Merck that is eligible for inclusion in the review. TF: has received within the past three years personal fees for participation in the Scientific Board and lectures of the JUMPstart programme from Fresenius Kabi, for participation in data monitoring committees from Novartis, Bayer, Janssen, Roche, Daiichi-Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Coherex Medical and BiosenseWebster, and for statistical consultancies from Novartis, Bayer, CSL Behring, Galapagos, Vifor, Mediconomics, Penumbra, but all outside the submitted work. CH: has received research grants from Roche, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibbs, Sanofi, honoraries for talks from Merck and a travel grant from Celgene. Remaining authors have none declared., (© The Author(s), 2024.)

Objective: The introduction of disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) has led to a deceleration of disease course over the years. Although decreased relapse rate constitutes a factor, the role of relapse-associated worsening (RAW) and progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) in MS course deceleration is still unclear., Methods: We retrospectively examined long-term Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression in patients referred to the MS Center of Montichiari (Italy) and diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS from 1980 to 2022. To isolate PIRA, we deducted all EDSS changes associated with relapses from overall EDSS change. We compared the relative contribution of PIRA and RAW to EDSS progression in patients diagnosed in different periods using mixed-effects models., Results: A total of 1,405 patients were included in the study, of whom 231 were diagnosed in 1980-1996 (pre-treatment era), 577 in 1997-2008 (injectable disease-modifying therapy era), and 597 after 2008 (oral drugs, monoclonal antibodies, and anti-CD20 era). Across ages, both PIRA and RAW were reduced in patients diagnosed in more recent periods as compared with earlier periods. The average contribution of PIRA to overall EDSS progression was already predominant in patients diagnosed in 1980-1996 (78%) and in 1997-2008 (76%), but it was significantly increased (p = 0.0009) in patients diagnosed in later years (87%)., Interpretation: The deceleration of MS course observed throughout the years is determined not only by fewer RAW events, but also by a reduction in PIRA. However, the shift toward a mostly relapse-independent progression highlights the importance of evaluating new therapies based on their effect on PIRA. ANN NEUROL 2024., (© 2024 The Author(s). Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

Background: Evidence on the impact of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) during pregnancy in women with multiple sclerosis (MS) is limited., Objectives: To investigate disease activity and pregnancy outcomes in a retrospective cohort of women exposed to DMF in early pregnancy., Methods: Women discontinuing DMF after pregnancy confirmation were identified from 29 Italian MS Centers. Disease activity 12 months before conception, during pregnancy, and 12 months postpartum were recorded, exploring reactivation predictors. Pregnancy and fetal outcomes were assessed., Results: The study analyzed 137 pregnancies (12 pregnancy losses, 125 live births) from 137 women (mean age 32.9 ± 4.7 years), discontinuing DMF within a median (interquartile range (IQR)) interval of 4.9 (3.7-5.7) weeks from conception. In live birth pregnancies, annualized relapse rate (ARR) significantly decreased during pregnancy (ARR = 0.07, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03-0.14, p = 0.021) compared to pre-conception (ARR = 0.21 (95% CI: 0.14-0.30)) and increased postpartum ((ARR = 0.22 (95% CI: 0.15-0.32), p = 0.006). Median time to first relapse (TTFR) was 3.16 (IQR: 1:87-5.42) months. Higher pre-conception relapse number (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.08-5.02) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS; HR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.17-2.74) were associated with shorter TTFR, while treatment resumption with longer TTFR (HR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11-0.74). Fetal outcomes were unaffected by DMF exposure., Conclusion: DMF discontinuation does not increase relapse risk during pregnancy. Early therapy restart prevents postpartum relapses. Early DMF exposure shows no adverse fetal outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: D.L. received travel funding from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Horizon, Alexion speaking or consultation fees from Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Teva, Biogen, Roche, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer-Schering. S.B. received travel funding from Biogen and Bristol-Myers Squibb. F.B. reported receiving teaching honoraria from Novartis and personal fees from Eisai, Biogen, and Chiesi outside the submitted work. M.P.A. has received research grants honoraria as a speaker and member of Advisory Boards from Biogen, Bayer, Novartis, Roche, Teva, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck, Roche Celgene BMS, Janssen, Horizon. S.B. speaker honoraria and/or travel/congress grant from: Novartis, Merck-Serono, Alexion, BMS, Biogen, Roche, Janssen-Cilag. Research grant from Roche. G.B. received honoraria for speaking or consultation fee from Almirall, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva, Roche. M.B. declares fees from Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, and Novartis. S.B. has been founded for advisory board, academic purposes and speech honoraria by Genzyme, Roche, Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis and Almirall. P.C. received honoraria for speaking and/or for consultancy and support for participation to scientific congresses from Almirall, Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Teva, Alexion, Celgene BMS, Janssen, Horizon. M.C. received personal compensations for public speaking from Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva and consulting fees from Roche and Zambon. D.C. is an Advisory Board member of Almirall, Bayer-Schering, Biogen, GW Pharmaceutical, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva and received honoraria for speaking or consultation fee from Almirall, Bayer-Schering, Biogen, GW Pharmaceuticals, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. He is also the principal investigator in clinical trials for Bayer-Schering, Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme. E.C. received travel grant, speaker fee and consultancy from Biogen Idec, Teva, Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche and Admirall. A.C. has served on scientific advisory boards for Merck-Serono, Sanofi-Genzyme, Biogen, Novartis, Almirall. She has received institutional research support from Roche and Biogen. A.C. received speaker honoraria from Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva and travel grants from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva; advisory boards member honoraria from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Teva. E.D.A. received speaking honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Bayer-Schering. M.D.F. participated on advisory boards and steering committees for and received speaker or writing honoraria, research support and funding for traveling from Alexion, BMS, Bayer, Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Horizon, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Siemens Healthineers, Teva and Viatris. R.D. received honoraria as a speaker and member of advisory boards by: Merck-Serono, Roche, Novartis and travel funding from Almirall, Biogen, Novartis and Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Merck-Serono. R.F. has received consulting fees and honoraria for advisory boards from Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, and TEVA. E.F. has received travel grants from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, and Roche. M.F. is Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Neurology, Associate Editor of Human Brain Mapping, Associate Editor of Radiology, and Associate Editor of Neurological Sciences; received compensation for consulting services from Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi; speaking activities from Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Chiesi Italia SpA, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, Janssen, Merck-Serono, Neopharmed Gentili, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and Teva; participation in Advisory Boards for Alexion, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Takeda; scientific direction of educational events for Biogen, Merck, Roche, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme; he receives research support from Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Italian Ministry of Health, Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla, and Fondazione Italiana di Ricerca per la SLA. M.F. published opinions in a medical journal on other pharmaceuticals and received financial support for travel and meeting attendance from Biogen, Merck, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Novartis. A.G. received honoraria for speaking and travel grants from Merck, Genzyme, Teva, Mylan, Roche and Novartis. F.G. received research funding from Sanofi-Genzyme and Biogen, fees for advisory boards and speaking honoraria from Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono and Roche, travel funding from Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono, and Roche. A.I. received consulting fees from Janssen. R.L. received personal compensations for speaking or consultancy from Biogen, BMS, Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Alexion. L.L. received travel grant, speaker fee and consultancy from Biogen Idec, Teva, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche and Almirall. M.L. has served on advisory boards and/or has received travel grants and/or speaker honoraria from Merck, Biogen, Almirall, Novartis, and Sanofi-Genzyme. G.L. received speaker honoraria and/or consultancy from Biogen, Teva, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Almirall, Roche. G.M. received travel funding from Almirall, Biogen, Novartis and Sanofi-Genzyme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Horizon, Roche, Merck-Serono. M.M. received compensation for consulting services, speaking activities, and participation in advisory board from Alexion, Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, CSL Behring, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Janssen, Merck-Serono, and Viatris; he received research support from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, and Roche. L.M. received honoraria for speaking activity at scientific meetings and/or advisory boards from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Roche, Alexion, Celgene, Almirall. G.N. received travel funding from Almirall, Biogen, Novartis and Sanofi-Genzyme, Horizon, Roche, Merck-Serono. F.P. reports grants from Biogen, grants from Merck, grants from FISM, grants from Onlus association, grants from University of Catania, personal fees from Almirall, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Biogen, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from TEVA, outside the submitted work. P.R. received travel expenses or honoraria for speaking or participating to advisory board by: Biogen idec, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi. S.R. has received travel expenses or honoraria for speaking or participating to advisory boardby: Biogen idec, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Teva, Roche, Bristol-Myers squibb. G.S. received travel expenses by Roche and Novartis. E.S. received speaker honoraria and/or consultancy from Biogen, Teva, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Almirall, and Roche. L.S. received congress grants from Merck-Serono, Biogen and board grants from Norvartis, Merck-Serono. M.P.S. has received consulting fees from Biogen, GeNeuro, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi and Teva. V.T. has received honoraria, travel grants and research grant support from FISM, Italian Ministry of Health, Alexion, Roche, Merck, Biogen, Novartis, Viatris, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Almirall, Horizon, Lundbeck, Sanofi, Janssen. D.V. has received travel grants and honoraria for Advisory Boards from Novartis, Roche, Teva, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono, and Almirall. G.A.M. received ravel funding, speaking or consultation fees from Almirall, Bayer-Schering, Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Teva, Mylan, Bristol Mayers Squibb and research grants from Roche and Biogen. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.

Background: Higher age is associated with less inflammatory disease activity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). It is unknown whether age itself or disease duration underlies this association., Objectives: This study investigated the effects of age, disease duration, and inflammatory disease activity in people with RRMS., Methods: Individual patient-level data from five large phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was utilized to investigate the association of both age and disease duration with annualized relapse rate (ARR), contrast-enhancing lesions (CELs), and new T2 lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline and follow-up., Results: The data set included 5626 participants. Higher age was associated with lower ARRs, lower CEL number on MRI at baseline and follow-up, and lower new T2 lesion numbers at follow-up. This effect was present in all disease duration groups. For example, we found a lower number of new T2 lesions on MRI during follow-up in higher age groups compared to lower age groups, independent of disease duration., Conclusion: Aging in RRMS is associated with a lower risk of inflammatory disease activity, across different disease durations. Age should be taken into account when designing clinical trials and future research should investigate how age should be integrated into personalized predictions of treatment response and risk profiling., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: E.M.E.C. reports no disclosures. S.K. reports no disclosures. O.C. is a member of independent DSMB for Novartis, gave a teaching talk on McDonald criteria in a Merck local symposium, and contributed to an Advisory Board for Biogen; she is Deputy Editor of Neurology, for which she receives an honorarium. M.P.S. received consulting fees from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Immunic, Alexion. F.B. serves on the steering committee and is iDMC member for Biogen, Merck, Roche, and EISAI. He acts as a consultant for Roche, Biogen, Merck, IXICO, Jansen, and Combinostics. He has research agreements with Novartis, Merck, Biogen, GE, and Roche. He is co-founder and share holder of Queen Square Analytics Ltd. D.L.A. reports consulting fees from Biogen, Celgene, Frequency Therapeutics, Genentech, Merck, Novartis, Race to Erase MS, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Shionogi, and Xfacto Communications; grants from Immunotec and Novartis; and an equity interest in NeuroRx. M.M.S. serves on the editorial board of Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis Journal and Frontiers in Neurology; receives research support from the Dutch MS Research Foundation, Eurostars-EUREKA, ARSEP, Amsterdam Neuroscience, and ZonMW (Vidi grant, project no. 09150172010056); and has served as a consultant for or received research support from Atara Biotherapeutics, Biogen, Celgene/Bristol Meyers Squibb, EIP, Sanofi, MedDay, and Merck. Z.L.E.V.K. reports no disclosures. J.M. reports no disclosures. M.W.K. received consulting fees and travel support from Biogen Idec, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and EMD Serono. B.M.J.U. has received research support and/or consultancy fees from Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, TEVA, and Immunic Therapeutics. A.E. has received research grants from the Medical Research Council (MRC), National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Innovate UK, Biogen, Merck, and Roche. He serves as an advisory board member of Merck Serono and Bristol Myers Squib. He is the founder and equity stakeholder in Queen Square Analytics Ltd. He serves on the editorial board of Neurology (American Academy of Neurology). J.K. has accepted speaker and consulting fees from Merck, Biogen, TEVA, Sanofi, Genzyme, Roche, and Novartis. E.M.M.S. has accepted speaker fees from Merck and Novartis.

Background and Purpose: The first randomized placebo-controlled therapeutic trial in radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS), ARISE, demonstrated that treatment with dimethyl fumarate (DMF) delayed the onset of a first clinical event related to CNS demyelination and was associated with a significant reduction in new and/or newly enlarging T2-weighted hyperintense lesions. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of DMF on volumetric measures, including whole brain, thalamic, and subcortical gray matter volumes, brainstem and upper cervical spine three-dimensional (3D) volumes, and brainstem and upper cervical spine surface characteristics., Methods: Standardized 3T MRIs including 3D isotropic T1-weighted gradient echo images were acquired at baseline and end-of-study according to the ARISE study protocol. The acquired data were analyzed using Structural Image Evaluation Using Normalization of Atrophy (SIENA), FreeSurfer v7.3, and an in-house pipeline for 3D conformational metrics. Multivariate mixed models for repeated measures were used to analyze rates of change in whole brain, thalamic, subcortical gray matter, as well as change in the 3D surface curvature of the dorsal pons and dorsal medulla and 3D volume change at the medulla-upper cervical spinal cord., Results: The study population consisted of 64 RIS subjects (DMF:30, placebo:34). No significant difference was seen in whole brain, thalamic, or subcortical gray matter volumes in treated vs. untreated RIS patients. A significant difference was observed in dorsal pons curvature with the DMF group having a lower least squares mean change of - 4.46 (standard estimate (SE): 3.77) when compared to placebo [6.94 (3.71)] (p = 0.036). In individuals that experienced a first clinical event, a greater reduction in medulla-upper cervical spinal cord volume (p = 0.044) and a decrease in surface curvature was observed at the dorsal medulla (p = 0.009) but not at the dorsal pons (p = 0.443)., Conclusions: The benefit of disease-modifying therapy in RIS may extend to CNS structures impacted by neurodegeneration that is below the resolution of conventional volumetric measures., (© 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

During the COVID-19 pandemic, people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and their healthcare providers have faced unique challenges related to the interaction between SARS-CoV-2, underlying neurological disease and the use of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs). Key concerns arose, primarily related to the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 infection could trigger the initial demyelinating event or exacerbate disease activity. Another major concern was the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines, especially for patients undergoing specific treatments that could weaken their antibody responses. In the post-infection phase, identifying long COVID in patients with MS has been complicated due to the large overlap between post-infection sequelae and MS symptoms. In addition, disruptions in health and rehabilitation services have made it difficult for MS patients to access care. This Series article explores current evidence on the interaction between MS and SARS-CoV-2, identifies the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic in the care of patients with MS, and discusses the significant adoption of digital health solutions, including telemedicine and new technology-based rehabilitation approaches. Based on lessons learned, recommendations and future directions are offered for managing patients with MS, rethinking healthcare systems and improving health outcomes in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era., Competing Interests: LP has received personal fees and non-financial support from Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Viatris. GA has received compensation for consulting services, speaking honoraria or participation in advisory boards from Merck, Roche, and Horizon Therapeutics; travel support for scientific meetings from Novartis, Roche, ECTRIMS and EAN. She serves as editor for Europe of the Multiple Sclerosis Journal—Experimental, Translational and Clinical journal; and as a member of the editorial and scientific committee of Acta Neurológica Colombiana. She is a member of the International Women in Multiple Sclerosis (iWiMS) network executive committee, of the European Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosis (BioMS-eu) steering committee, and of the MOGAD Eugene Devic European Network (MEDEN) steering group. EGC has received educational and/or consultancy fees from Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Teva. DG has received educational and consultancy fees from Amgen, Almirall, Biogen, Biomerieux, Diasorin, Eli Lilly, Janssen, PDB Biotec, Qiagen, Quidel. She was partially supporedt by the Italian Ministry of Health, Ricerca Corrente, Linea 1. JK has received grants and consulting fees from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Biogen, Teva, Merck, Novartis, Immunic, Celgene and Sanofi (payments to institution); reports speaker relationships with F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Biogen, Celgene, Teva, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi and Viatris (payments to institution). DK has received educational and consultancy fees from Biogen, Teva, Merck and Roche. LL has received educational and consultancy fees from Biogen, Teva, Merck, Roche, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Almirall, Horizon, Alexion, Sanofi. CL has received consulting or travel fees from Biogen, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Teva and Merck, and research grant from Biogen. MPS has received consulting fees from Biogen, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Merck, Alexion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Immunic. DS has received financial support for conference travel and/or speaker honoraria from. Novartis, Biogen, Merck, Teva, Janssen-Cilag, and Roche and is also supported by the Charles University: Cooperation Program in Neuroscience and by the National Institute for. Neurological Research project funded by the European Union–Next Generation EU. (Programme EXCELES, ID Project No. LX22NPO5107). TZ has received consulting or serving on speaker bureaus for Alexion, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Sandoz, Novartis, Merck, Teva and Sanofi, as well as research support from Biogen, Novartis, Merck, Roche and Sanofi. MDF participated on advisory boards and steering committees for and received speaker or writing honoraria, research support and funding for travelling from Alexion, BMS, Bayer, Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Horizon, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Siemens Healthineers, Teva and Viatris., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Background: The lack of standardized disability progression evaluation in multiple sclerosis (MS) hinders reproducibility of clinical study results, due to heterogeneous and poorly reported criteria., Objective: To demonstrate the impact of using different parameters when evaluating MS progression, and to introduce an automated tool for reproducible outcome computation., Methods: Re-analyzing BRAVO clinical trial data (NCT00605215), we examined the fluctuations in computed treatment effect on confirmed disability progression (CDP) and progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) when varying different parameters. These analyses were conducted using the msprog package for R, which we developed as a tool for CDP assessment from longitudinal data, given a set of criteria that can be specified by the user., Results: The BRAVO study reported a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.69 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46-1.02) for CDP. Using the different parameter configurations, the resulting treatment effect on CDP varied considerably, with HRs ranging from 0.59 (95% CI: 0.41-0.86) to 0.72 (95% CI: 0.48-1.07). The treatment effect on PIRA varied from an HR = 0.62 (95% CI: 0.41-0.93) to an HR = 0.65 (95% CI: 0.40-1.04)., Conclusions: The adoption of an open-access tool validated by the research community, with clear parameter specification and standardized output, could greatly reduce heterogeneity in CDP estimation and promote repeatability of study results., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsMaria Pia Sormani has received personal compensation for consulting services and for speaking activities from Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Bristol-Meyer Squibb, Immunic and Biogen. The other author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA), a recent concept to formalize disability accrual in multiple sclerosis (MS) independent of relapses, has gained popularity as a potential clinical trial outcome. We discuss its shortcomings and appraise the challenges of implementing it in clinical settings, experimental trials, and research. The current definition of PIRA assumes that acute inflammation, which can manifest as a relapse, and neurodegeneration, manifesting as progressive disability accrual, can be disentangled by introducing specific time windows between the onset of relapses and the observed increase in disability. The term PIRMA (progression independent of relapse and MRI activity) was recently introduced to indicate disability accrual in the absence of both clinical relapses and new brain and spinal cord MRI lesions. Assessing PIRMA in clinical practice is highly challenging because it necessitates frequent clinical assessments and brain and spinal cord MRI scans. PIRA is commonly assessed using Expanded Disability Status Scale, a scale heavily weighted toward motor disability, whereas a more granular assessment of disability deterioration, including cognitive decline, using composite measures or other tools, such as digital tools, would possess greater utility. Similarly, using PIRA as an outcome measure in randomized clinical trials is also challenging and requires methodological considerations. The underpinning pathobiology of disability accumulation, that is not associated with relapses, may encompass chronic active lesions (slowly expanding lesions and paramagnetic rim lesions), cortical lesions, brain and spinal cord atrophy, particularly in the gray matter, diffuse and focal microglial activation, persistent leptomeningeal enhancement, and white matter tract damage. We propose to use PIRA to understand the main determinant of disability accrual in observational, cohort studies, where regular MRI scans are not included, and introduce the term of "advanced-PIRMA" to investigate the contributions to disability accrual of the abovementioned processes, using conventional and advanced imaging. This is supported by the knowledge that MRI reflects the MS pathogenic mechanisms better than purely clinical descriptors. Any residual disability accrual, which remains unexplained after considering all these mechanisms with imaging, will highlight future research priorities to help complete our understanding of MS pathogenesis.

Background: Distinctive differences in multiple sclerosis (MS) have been observed by race and ethnicity. We aim to (1) assess how often race and ethnicity were reported in clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov , (2) evaluate whether the population was diverse enough, and (3) compare with publications., Methods: We included phase 3 clinical trials registered with results on ClinicalTrials.gov between 2007 and 2023. When race and/or ethnicity were reported, we searched for the corresponding publications., Results: Out of the 99 included studies, 56% reported race and/or ethnicity, of which only 26% of those primarily completed before 2017. Studies reporting race or ethnicity contributed to a total of 33,891 participants, mainly enrolled in Eastern Europe. Most were White (93%), and the median percentage of White participants was 93% (interquartile range (IQR) = 86%-98%), compared to 3% for Black (IQR = 1%-12%) and 0.2% for Asian (IQR = 0%-1%). Four trials omitted race and ethnicity in publications and even when information was reported, some discrepancies in terminology were identified and categories with fewer participants were often collapsed., Conclusion: More efforts should be done to improve transparency, accuracy, and representativeness, in publications and at a design phase, by addressing social determinants of health that historically limit the enrollment of underrepresented population., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: M.P., A.B., A.C., and N.M. have nothing to disclose; A.S. received speaker’s honoraria from Chiesi and grant from MSBase outside from this work; F.B. received the 2022 Biostatistic/Informatics Junior Faculty Award (grant code BI-2107-38160) awarded by the National MS Society; I.S. received consulting fees from Roche, Biogen, Horizon, Novartis, Hoya, Hippocrates Research, D.M.G Italia, Eyepharma, and DreamsLab out of this work; M.P.S. received consulting fees from Roche, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Celgene, Immunic, Geneuro, GSK, and Medday; received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Roche, Biogen Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, and Celgene; and participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Roche, Sanofi, Novartis, Merck.

Background: in the early stages of Multiple Sclerosis (MS), initiating high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (HE DMTs) may represent an optimal strategy for delaying neurological damage and long-term disease progression, especially in highly active MS patients (HAMS). Natalizumab (NAT) and Ocrelizumab (OCR) are recognized as HE DMTs with significant anti-inflammatory effects. This study investigates NEDA-3 achievement in treatment-naïve HAMS patients receiving NAT or OCR over three years., Methods: we retrospectively enrolled treatment-naïve HAMS patients undergoing NAT or OCR, collecting demographic, clinical, and instrumental data before and after treatment initiation to compare with propensity score analysis disease activity, time to disability worsening, and NEDA-3 achievement., Results: we recruited 281 HAMS patients with a mean age of 32.7 years (SD 10.33), treated with NAT (157) or OCR (124). After three years, the Kaplan-Meier probability of achieving NEDA-3 was 66.0 % (95 % CI: 57.3 % - 76.0 %) with OCR and 68.2 % (95 % CI: 59.9 % - 77.7 %) with NAT without significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.27) DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: starting HE DMT with monoclonal antibodies for HAMS could achieve NEDA-3 in a high percentage of patients without differences between NAT or OCR., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Irene Schiavetti reports a relationship with Roche, Biogen, Horizon, Novartis, Hoya, Hippocrates Research, D.M.G Italia, Eyepharma, DreamsLab that includes: consulting or advisory. Livia Pasquali reports a relationship with Alexion, Biogen, Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, Roche that includes: consulting or advisory and travel reimbursement. Elisabetta Signoriello reports a relationship with Almirall, Biogen, Genzyme, Novartis, Teva that includes: board membership and travel reimbursement. Maria Pia Sormani reports a relationship with Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Teva, Genzyme, Roche, Novartis, GeNeuro, Medday that includes: consulting or advisory. Jessica Frau reports a relationship with Biogen, Bristol, Novartis, Genzyme, Merck, Teva, Alexion that includes: board membership, consulting or advisory, and speaking and lecture fees. Daniele Caliendo reports a relationship with Merck that includes: funding grants. Alessio Signori reports a relationship with Roche, Horizon, Novartis that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Andrea Surcinelli reports a relationship with Roche, Merck, Biogen, Sanofi, Novartis that includes: travel reimbursement. Simona Bonavita reports a relationship with Novartis, Merck-Serono, Alexion, BMS, Biogen, Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Horizon that includes: speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement. Roberta Fantozzi reports a relationship with Novartis, Roche, Merck Serono, Bristol-Myers Squibb that includes: board membership and consulting or advisory. Antonio Carotenuto reports a relationship with Almirall, ECTRIMS- MAGNIMS, Biogen, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck, Ipsen, Novartis that includes: funding grants. Doriana Landi reports a relationship with Biogen, Merck Serono, Teva, Bristol Myers Squibb, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Horizon, Alexion, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Bayer-Schering that includes: speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement. Giacomo Lus reports a relationship with Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi- Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Teva neuroscience that includes: funding grants. Eleonora Cocco reports a relationship with Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Genzyme that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. Matteo Lucchini reports a relationship with Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Almirall, Horizon, Bayer that includes: consulting or advisory, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Girolama Alessandra Marfia reports a relationship with Almirall, Bayer-Schering, Biogen, Sanofi Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Teva, Mylan, Bristol Mayers Squibb, Roche, Biogen that includes: consulting or advisory, funding grants, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Matteo Foschi reports a relationship with Merck, Biogen, Sanofi, Roche, Novartis that includes: consulting or advisory and travel reimbursement. Massimiliano Mirabella reports a relationship with Bayer Schering, Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Teva, Mylan, Almirall, CSL Behring, Roche, Ultragenix that includes: board membership, consulting or advisory, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Diego Centonze reports a relationship with Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen, GW Pharmaceuticals, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Protagon, Sandoz, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Alexion, Mitsubishi, Teva, Celgene that includes: board membership, funding grants, and non-financial support. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Significant advancements have been achieved in delineating the progress of the Global PROMS (PROMS) Initiative. The PROMS Initiative, a collaborative endeavor by the European Charcot Foundation and the Multiple Sclerosis International Federation, strives to amplify the influence of patient input on MS care and establish a cohesive perspective on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) for diverse stakeholders. This initiative has established an expansive, participatory governance framework launching four dedicated working groups that have made substantive contributions to research, clinical management, eHealth, and healthcare system reform. The initiative prioritizes the global integration of patient (For the purposes of the Global PROMS Initiative, the term "patient" refers to the people with the disease (aka People with Multiple Sclerosis - pwMS): any individual with lived experience of the disease. People affected by the disease/Multiple Sclerosis: any individual or group that is affected by the disease: E.g., family members, caregivers will be also engaged as the other stakeholders in the initiative). insights into the management of MS care. It merges subjective PROs with objective clinical metrics, thereby addressing the complex variability of disease presentation and progression. Following the completion of its second phase, the initiative aims to help increasing the uptake of eHealth tools and passive PROs within research and clinical settings, affirming its unwavering dedication to the progressive refinement of MS care. Looking forward, the initiative is poised to continue enhancing global surveys, rethinking to the relevant statistical approaches in clinical trials, and cultivating a unified stance among 'industry', regulatory bodies and health policy making regarding the application of PROs in MS healthcare strategies., Competing Interests: LuC was employed by Hoffmann-La Roche. LoC was employed by Ad Scientiam. PK was employed by Merck KGaA. ACV has received reimbursement for developing educational presentations, educational and research grants, consultation fees, and/or travel stipends from Biogen Colombia, Genzyme Colombia, Merck Colombia, Roche Colombia, Novartis Colombia. CB has received travel support and/or research grants and/or lecture fees and/or advisory services by Novartis, Merck, Genesis, Sanofi, Teva, Roche, Biogen, Mylan, Tikun Europe ECC has received reimbursement for developing educational presentations, educational and research grants, consultation fees, and/or travel stipends from Biogen Argentina and LATAM, Genzyme Argentina, Merck Argentina and LATAM, Roche Argentina and LATAM, Raffo, Novartis Argentina, AstraZeneca Argentina, Horizon therapeutics, LACTRIMS, Harvard Medical School MP has received reimbursement for developing educational presentations from Biogen and Merck. SG has received reimbursement for developing educational presentations, research grants, consultation fees, and/or travel stipends from Roche, Merck and the Sumaira Foundation. VC received a grant from the European Charcot Foundation, received support for scientific meetings from Biogen, Janssen, Novartis, BMS, Roche and speaking honoraria from Novartis and Alexion. VR reports fees for traveling from Novartis, Merck, Biogen and Roche, speaker’s honoraria from Novartis, Sandoz, Merck, Biogen, consulting fees from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Janssen, M3 Global Research and Atheneum Partners, all outside of the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. H-PH declared that he was an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Zaratin, Samadzadeh, Seferoğlu, Ricigliano, dos Santos Silva, Tunc, Brichetto, Coetzee, Helme, Khan, McBurney, Peryer, Weiland, Baneke, Battaglia, Block, Capezzuto, Carment, Cortesi, Cutter, Leocani, Hartung, Hillert, Hobart, Immonen, Kamudoni, Middleton, Moghames, Montalban, Peeters, Sormani, van Tonder, White, Comi and Vermersch.)

Background: To mimic as closely as possible a randomised controlled trial (RCT) and calibrate the real-world evidence (RWE) studies against a known treatment effect would be helpful to understand if RWE can support causal conclusions in selected circumstances. The aim was to emulate the TRANSFORMS trial comparing Fingolimod (FTY) versus intramuscular interferon β-1a (IFN) using observational data., Methods: We extracted from the MSBase registry all the patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) collected in the period 2011-2021 who received IFN or FTY (0.5 mg) and with the same inclusion and exclusion criteria of the TRANSFORMS RCT. The primary endpoint was the annualised relapse rate (ARR) over 12 months. Patients were 1:1 propensity-score (PS) matched. Relapse-rate ratio (RR) was calculated by mean of a negative binomial regression., Results: A total of 4376 patients with RRMS (1140 in IFN and 3236 in FTY) were selected. After PS, 856 patients in each group were matched. The ARR was 0.45 in IFN and 0.25 in FTY with a significant difference between the two groups (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.68; p<0.001). The result of the emulation was very similar and fell within the 95% CI of that observed in the RCT (RR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.64; p<0.001) with a standardised difference of 0.66 (p=0.51)., Conclusions: By applying the same inclusion and exclusion criteria used in the RCT and employing appropriate methodology, we successfully replicated the RCT results with only minor discrepancies. Also, even if the confounding bias cannot be fully eliminated, conducting a rigorous target trial emulation could still yield valuable insights for comparative effectiveness research., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MP, SO, BY, RK, AYS have nothing to disclose; AS received speaker’s honoraria from Chiesi and grant from MSBase outside from this work. TK served on scientific advisory boards for BMS, Roche, Janssen, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis, Merck and Biogen, steering committee for Brain Atrophy Initiative by Sanofi Genzyme, received conference travel support and/or speaker honoraria from WebMD Global, Eisai, Novartis, Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, BioCSL and Merck and received research or educational event support from Biogen, Novartis, Genzyme, Roche, Celgene and Merck. DH received speaker honoraria and consulting fees from Biogen, Merck, Teva, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Novartis, as well as support for research activities from Biogen and Czech Minsitry of Education [project Progres Q27/LF1]. EKH received honoraria/research support from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novars, Roche, and Teva; has been member of advisory boards for Actelion, Biogen, Celgene, Merck Serono, Novars, and Sanofi Genzyme; has been supported by the Czech Ministry of Educaon research project PROGRES Q27/LF1. RA received honoraria as a speaker and for serving on scientific advisory boards from Bayer, Biogen, GSK, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi-Genzyme. JK received speaker fees, research support, travel support, and/or advisory boards Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Society, SNSF, University of Basel, Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Alliance, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Octave Bioscience, Roche, Sanofi. FP served an advisory board Alexion, Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Bristol Meyers&Squibb, Merck, Novartis and Roche; he also received personal fee for speaking activities; he also received research grants by Biogen, Merck, Roche, FISM, Reload Onlus and MIUR Ministero Italiano della Ricerca e della Università. GI received speaking honoraria from Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi, Merck, Roche, Almirall and Teva. SJK received compensation for scientific advisory board activity from Merck and Roche and for serving on IDMC for Biogen. SE received speaker honoraria and consultant fees from Biogen Idec, Novartis, Merck, Bayer, Sanofi Genzyme, Roche and Teva. PG has served in advisory boards for Novartis, EMD Serono, Roche, Biogen idec, Sanofi Genzyme, Pendopharm and has received grant support from Genzyme and Roche, has received research grants for his institution from Biogen idec, Sanofi Genzyme, EMD Serono. PD served on editorial boards and has been supported to attend meetings by EMD, Biogen, Novartis, Genzyme, and TEVA Neuroscience. He holds grants from the CIHR and the MS Society of Canada and has received funding for investigator-initiated trials from Biogen, Novartis, and Genzyme. HB has received institutional (Monash University) funding from Biogen, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Merck, Alexion, CSL, and Novartis; has carried out contracted research for Novartis, Merck, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and Biogen; has taken part in speakers’ bureaus for Biogen, Genzyme, UCB, Novartis, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and Merck; has received personal compensation from Oxford Health Policy Forum for the Brain Health Steering Committee. AV served on advisory boards for Novartis, Biogen, Merck and Roche and NervGen. She received unrestricted research grants from Novartis, Biogen, Merck and Roche. She is currently a co-Principal investigator on a co-sponsored observational study with Roche, evaluating a Roche-developed smartphone app, Floodlight-MS. She has received speaker’s honoraria and travel support from Novartis, Roche, Biogen and Merck. She serves as the Chief operating Officer of the MSBase Foundation (not for profit). Her primary research support is from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and MS Research Australia. MPS received consulting fees from Roche, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Celgene, Immunic, Geneuro, GSK, Medday; received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Roche, Biogen Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Celgene; participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Roche, Sanofi, Novartis, Merck., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) often revealed non-significant treatment effects on disability progression., Objectives: To investigate whether the failure to detect a significant benefit from treatment may be motivated by a delay in treatment effect, possibly related to baseline characteristics., Methods: We re-analyzed data from two RCTs testing interferon-beta and glatiramer-acetate versus placebo in progressive MS with no significant effect on EDSS progression. We first designed a time-dependent Cox model with no treatment effect up to time = t 0 , and constant hazard ratio (HR) after time = t 0 . We selected the best-fitting t 0 from 0 (standard Cox model) to 2.5 years. Furthermore, we modeled the delay as a function of baseline EDSS and fitted the resulting Cox model to the merged dataset., Results: The time-dependent Cox model revealed a significant benefit of treatment delayed by t 0  = 2.5 years for the SPECTRIMS study (HR = 0.65 (0.43-0.98), p  = 0.041), and delayed by t 0  = 2 years for the PROMISE study (HR = 0.65, (0.42-0.99), p  = 0.044). In the merged dataset, the HR for the EDSS-dependent delayed effect was 0.68 (0.56, 0.82), p  < 0.001., Conclusion: The assumption of a delayed treatment effect improved the fit to the data of the two examined RCTs, uncovering a significant, although shifted, benefit of treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsMaria Pia Sormani has received personal compensation for consulting services and for speaking activities from Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Bristol-Meyer Squibb, Immunic and Biogen. The other author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background and Purpose: Cladribine tablets, a purine analogue antimetabolite, offer a unique treatment regimen, involving short courses at the start of the first and second year, with no further treatment needed in years 3 and 4. However, comprehensive evidence regarding patient outcomes beyond the initial 24 months of cladribine treatment is limited., Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study enrolled 204 patients with multiple sclerosis who had completed the 2-year course of cladribine treatment. The primary outcomes were therapeutic choices and clinical disease activity assessed by annualized relapse rate after the 2-year treatment course., Results: A total of 204 patients were enrolled; most patients (75.4%) did not initiate new treatments in the 12 months postcladribine. The study found a significant reduction in annualized relapse rate at the 12-month follow-up after cladribine completion compared to the year prior to starting therapy (0.07 ± 0.25 vs. 0.82 ± 0.80, p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with relapses during cladribine treatment were more likely to start new therapies, whereas older patients were less likely. The safety profile of cladribine was favorable, with lymphopenia being the primary registered adverse event., Conclusions: This study provides insights into therapeutic choices and disease activity following cladribine treatment. It highlights cladribine's effectiveness in reducing relapse rates and disability progression, reaffirming its favorable safety profile. Real-world data, aligned with previous reports, draw attention to ocrelizumab and natalizumab as common choices after cladribine. However, larger, prospective studies for validation and a more comprehensive understanding of cladribine's long-term impact are necessary., (© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Neurofilament proteins have been validated as specific body fluid biomarkers of neuro-axonal injury. The advent of highly sensitive analytical platforms that enable reliable quantification of neurofilaments in blood samples and simplify longitudinal follow-up has paved the way for the development of neurofilaments as a biomarker in clinical practice. Potential applications include assessment of disease activity, monitoring of treatment responses, and determining prognosis in many acute and chronic neurological disorders as well as their use as an outcome measure in trials of novel therapies. Progress has now moved the measurement of neurofilaments to the doorstep of routine clinical practice for the evaluation of individuals. In this Review, we first outline current knowledge on the structure and function of neurofilaments. We then discuss analytical and statistical approaches and challenges in determining neurofilament levels in different clinical contexts and assess the implications of neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels in normal ageing and the confounding factors that need to be considered when interpreting NfL measures. In addition, we summarize the current value and potential clinical applications of neurofilaments as a biomarker of neuro-axonal damage in a range of neurological disorders, including multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer disease, frontotemporal dementia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, stroke and cerebrovascular disease, traumatic brain injury, and Parkinson disease. We also consider the steps needed to complete the translation of neurofilaments from the laboratory to the management of neurological diseases in clinical practice., (© 2024. Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: In the general population, maternal COVID-19 is associated with worse maternal and fetal outcomes. Two previous studies have assessed COVID-19 clinical outcomes in pregnant women with multiple sclerosis (MS), but there are no data about maternal and fetal outcomes., Objectives: In this multicenter study, we aimed to assess maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with MS and COVID-19 infection., Methods: We recruited pregnant patients with MS who contracted COVID-19 and were followed up in Italian and Turkish Centers, during 2020-2022. A control group was extracted from a previous Italian cohort. Associations between group (COVID-19 or healthy patients) and clinical outcomes (maternal complications, fetal malformations, and spontaneous abortion) were investigated with a weighted logistic regression where propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach was applied for adjusting for difference in baseline confounders., Results: In the multivariable analysis, COVID-19 during pregnancy was associated with a higher risk of maternal complications (odd ratio (OR) = 2.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.32-3.48; p = 0.002), while it was not associated with higher risk of spontaneous abortion and fetal malformations., Conclusion: Our data indicate that COVID-19 during pregnancy increases the risk of maternal complications, while it seems to have no significant impact on fetal outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: S.S. has received honoraria or consultancy fees for participating to advisory boards, giving educational lectures and/or travel and registration coverage for attending scientific congresses or symposia from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Teva, and Biogen Idec/Gen Pharma. R.K. has received honoraria for giving educational lectures, consultancy fees for participating advisory boards, and travel grants for attending scientific congresses or symposia from Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Teva, Biogen Idec/Gen Pharma of Turkey, Abdi İbrahim İlac, Deva, and ARIS. A.S. has received honoraria or consultancy fees for participating to advisory boards, giving educational lectures and/or travel and registration coverage for attending scientific congresses or symposia from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Teva, Biogen Idec/Gen Pharma of Turkey, and Abdi İbrahim İlac. E.P. received compensation for travel grants, participation in advisory board and/or speaking activities from Biogen, Merck Serono, Sanofi, Teva, and Novartis and serves on the editorial board of Frontiers in Neurology and Brain Sciences. M.P.A. served on scientific advisory boards for and has received speaker honoraria and research support from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Bayer Schering Pharma, and Sanofi Aventis and serves on the editorial board of Multiple Sclerosis Journal and BMC Neurology. M.P.S. received consulting fees from Roche, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Celgene, Immunic, Geneuro, GSK, and MedDay; received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Roche, Biogen Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, and Celgene; and participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Roche, Sanofi, Novartis, and Merck. I.S. received consulting fees from Hippocrates Research, NovaNeuro, Sakura Italia, ADL Farmaceutici, and Associazione Commissione Difesa Vista Onlus. C.C. received grants or contracts from Roche, Novartis, Merck Serono, Biogen, and Celgene and received consulting fees from Biogen. L.M. received compensation for consulting services, travel grants, and/or speaking activities from Biogen, Serono, Sanofi, Teva, Roche, and Novartis. E.S. received personal compensation from Almirall, Biogen, Sanofi, Novartis, Roche, Horizon, Alexion, Merck, Mylan, and Teva for traveling and advisory boards. S.D.B. received personal compensation from Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Merck Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi for traveling and advisory boards. M.B. received honoraria for speaking, advisory board, consulting from Teva, Genzyme, Biogen, Bristol MS, Merck, and Novartis. M.C. received personal compensations from Novartis, Genzyme, and Teva and consulting fees from Zambon. R.F. received honoraria for advisory boards and consulting from Bristol MS, Roche, Merck, and Novartis. P.C. received honoraria as speaker or travel grants to attend national and international conferences or consultation for advisory boards from Alexion, Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen, Cellgene-BMS, Janssen, Merck Serono, Teva, Roche, Novartis, Sandoz, and Sanofi-Genzyme. S.T. received travel grants or personal compensations from Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Janssen, Teva, and Almirall. The remaining authors have nothing to report.

Importance: Multiple sclerosis (MS) misdiagnosis remains an important issue in clinical practice., Objective: To quantify the performance of cortical lesions (CLs) and central vein sign (CVS) in distinguishing MS from other conditions showing brain lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional multicenter study, with clinical and MRI data acquired between January 2010 and May 2020. Centralized MRI analysis was conducted between July 2020 and December 2022 by 2 raters blinded to participants' diagnosis. Participants were recruited from 14 European centers and from a multicenter pan-European cohort. Eligible participants had a diagnosis of MS, clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), or non-MS conditions; availability of a brain 3-T MRI scan with at least 1 sequence suitable for CL and CVS assessment; presence of T2-hyperintense white matter lesions (WMLs). A total of 1051 individuals were included with either MS/CIS (n = 599; 386 [64.4%] female; mean [SD] age, 41.5 [12.3] years) or non-MS conditions (including other neuroinflammatory disorders, cerebrovascular disease, migraine, and incidental WMLs in healthy control individuals; n = 452; 302 [66.8%] female; mean [SD] age, 49.2 [14.5] years). Five individuals were excluded due to missing clinical or demographic information (n = 3) or unclear diagnosis (n = 2)., Exposures: MS/CIS vs non-MS conditions., Main Outcomes and Measures: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were used to explore the diagnostic performance of CLs and the CVS in isolation and in combination; sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for various cutoffs. The diagnostic importance of CLs and CVS compared to conventional MRI features (ie, presence of infratentorial, periventricular, and juxtacortical WMLs) was ranked with a random forest model., Results: The presence of CLs and the previously proposed 40% CVS rule had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for MS of 59.0% (95% CI, 55.1-62.8), 93.6% (95% CI, 91.4-95.6), and 73.9% (95% CI, 71.6-76.3) and 78.7% (95% CI, 75.5-82.0), 86.0% (95% CI, 82.1-89.5), and 81.5% (95% CI, 78.9-83.7), respectively. The diagnostic performance of the CVS (AUC, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.86-0.91]) was superior to that of CLs (AUC, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.75-0.80]; P < .001), and was increased when combining the 2 imaging markers (AUC, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.90-0.94]; P = .04); in the random forest model, both CVS and CLs outperformed the presence of infratentorial, periventricular, and juxtacortical WMLs in supporting MS differential diagnosis., Conclusions and Relevance: The findings in this study suggest that CVS and CLs may be valuable tools to increase the accuracy of MS diagnosis.

Anterior Visual Pathway (aVP) damage may be linked to diverse inflammatory, degenerative and/or vascular conditions. Currently however, a standardized methodological framework for extracting MRI biomarkers of the aVP is not available. We used high-resolution, 3-D MRI data to generate a probabilistic anatomical atlas of the normal aVP and its intraorbital (iOrb), intracanalicular (iCan), intracranial (iCran), optic chiasm (OC), and tract (OT) subdivisions. We acquired 0.6 mm 3 steady-state free-precession images from 24 healthy participants using a 3 T scanner. aVP masks were obtained by manual segmentation of each aVP subdivision. Mask straightening and normalization with cross-sectional area (CSA) preservation were obtained using scripts developed in-house. A probabilistic atlas ("aVP-24") was generated by averaging left and right sides of all subjects. Leave-one-out cross-validation with respect to interindividual variability was performed employing the Dice Similarity Index (DSI). Spatially normalized representations of the aVP subdivisions were generated. Overlapping CSA values before and after normalization demonstrate preservation of the aVP cross-section. Volume, length, CSA, and ellipticity index (ε) biometrics were extracted. The aVP-24 morphology followed previous descriptions from the gross anatomy. Atlas spatial validation DSI scores of 0.85 in 50% and 0.77 in 95% of participants indicated good generalizability across the subjects. The proposed MRI standardization framework allows for previously unavailable, geometrically unbiased biometric data of the entire aVP and provides the base for future spatial-resolved, group-level investigations., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can be classified into different clinical phenotypes based on their demographic, clinical, radiology, and laboratory features. We aimed to validate in an external cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients the prognostic value of a previously described phenotyping system (FEN-COVID-19) and to assess the reproducibility of phenotypes development as a secondary analysis., Methods: Patients were classified in phenotypes A, B or C according to the severity of oxygenation impairment, inflammatory response, hemodynamic and laboratory tests according to the FEN-COVID-19 method., Results: Overall, 992 patients were included in the study, and 181 (18%), 757 (76%) and 54 (6%) of them were assigned to the FEN-COVID-19 phenotypes A, B, and C, respectively. An association with mortality was observed for phenotype C vs. A (hazard ratio [HR] 3.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.81-5.30, p  < 0.001) and for phenotype C vs. B (HR 2.20, 95% CI 1.50-3.23, p  < 0.001). A non-statistically significant trend towards higher mortality was also observed for phenotype B vs. A (HR 1.41; 95% CI 0.92-2.15, p  = 0.115). By means of cluster analysis, three different phenotypes were also identified in our cohort, with an overall similar gradient in terms of prognostic impact to that observed when patients were assigned to FEN-COVID-19 phenotypes., Conclusions: The prognostic impact of FEN-COVID-19 phenotypes was confirmed in our external cohort, although with less difference in mortality between phenotypes A and B than in the original study.

Background and Purpose: Therapy for myasthenia gravis (MG) is undergoing a profound change, with new treatments being tested. These include complement inhibitors and neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) blockers. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis and network meta-analysis of randomized and placebo-controlled trials of innovative therapies in MG with available efficacy data., Methods: We assessed statistical heterogeneity across trials based on the Cochrane Q test and I 2 values, and mean differences were pooled using the random-effects model. Treatment efficacy was assessed after 26 weeks of eculizumab and ravulizumab, 28 days of efgartigimod, 43 days of rozanolixizumab, 12 weeks of zilucoplan, and 16, 24 or 52 weeks of rituximab treatment., Results: We observed an overall mean Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living scale (MG-ADL) score change of -2.17 points (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.67, -1.67; p < 0.001) as compared to placebo. No significant difference emerged between complement inhibitors and anti-FcRn treatment (p = 0.16). The change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis scale (QMG) score was -3.46 (95% CI -4.53, -2.39; p < 0.001), with a higher reduction with FcRns (-4.78 vs. -2.60; p < 0.001). Rituximab did not significantly improve the MG-ADL (-0.92 [95% CI -2.24, 0.39]; p = 0.17) or QMG scores (-1.9 [95% CI -3.97, 0.18]; p = 0.07). In the network meta-analysis, efgartigimod had the highest probability of being the best treatment, followed by rozanolixizumab., Conclusion: Anti-complement and FcRn treatments both proved to be effective in MG patients, whereas rituximab did not show a significant benefit for patients. Within the limitations of this meta-analysis, including efficacy time points, FcRn treatments showed a greater effect on QMG score in the short term. Real-life studies with long-term measurements are needed to confirm our results., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Importance: Emerging evidence suggests that progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) is a substantial contributor to long-term disability accumulation in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). To date, there is no uniform agreed-upon definition of PIRA, limiting the comparability of published studies., Objective: To summarize the current evidence about PIRA based on a systematic review, to discuss the various terminologies used in the context of PIRA, and to propose a harmonized definition for PIRA for use in clinical practice and future trials., Evidence Review: A literature search was conducted using the search terms multiple sclerosis, PIRA, progression independent of relapse activity, silent progression, and progression unrelated to relapses in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science, published between January 1990 and December 2022., Findings: Of 119 identified single records, 48 eligible studies were analyzed. PIRA was reported to occur in roughly 5% of all patients with RRMS per annum, causing at least 50% of all disability accrual events in typical RRMS. The proportion of PIRA vs relapse-associated worsening increased with age, longer disease duration, and, despite lower absolute event numbers, potent suppression of relapses by highly effective disease-modifying therapy. However, different studies used various definitions of PIRA, rendering the comparability of studies difficult., Conclusion and Relevance: PIRA is the most frequent manifestation of disability accumulation across the full spectrum of traditional MS phenotypes, including clinically isolated syndrome and early RRMS. The harmonized definition suggested here may improve the comparability of results in current and future cohorts and data sets.