Search

The evolving regulatory landscape has heightened the need for innovative, proactive, efficient and more meaningful solutions for 'real-world' post-authorization safety studies (PASS) that not only align with risk management objectives to gather additional safety monitoring information or assess a pattern of drug utilization, but also satisfy key regulatory requirements for marketing authorization holder risk management planning and execution needs. There is a need for data capture across the primary care and secondary care interface, or for exploring use of new medicines in secondary care to support conducting PASS. To fulfil this need, event monitoring has evolved. The Specialist Cohort Event Monitoring (SCEM) study is a new application that enables a cohort of patients prescribed a medicine in the hospital and secondary care settings to be monitored. The method also permits the inclusion of a comparator cohort of patients receiving standard care, or another counterfactual comparator group, to be monitored concurrently, depending on the study question. The approach has been developed in parallel with the new legislative requirement for pharmaceutical companies to undertake a risk management plan as part of post-authorization safety monitoring. SCEM studies recognize that the study population comprises those patients who may have treatment initiated under the care of specialist health care professionals and who are more complex in terms of underlying disease, co-morbidities and concomitant medications than the general disease population treated in primary care. The aims of this paper are to discuss the SCEM new-user study design, rationale and features that aim to address possible bias (such as selection bias) and current applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Problematic prescription drug use is reflected by or associated with drug-seeking aberrant behaviours. Research gaps include lack of post-marketing evidence and instruments. As part of the pharmacovigilance requirements, a risk management plan was developed for fentanyl buccal tablets (FEBT) by the manufacturer, with an additional pharmacovigilance activity requested by the regulatory authority, to investigate the risks of misuse, abuse, criminal use, off-label use and accidental exposure to FEBT after the product became commercially available. A Modified Prescription-Event Monitoring (M-PEM), observational, post-authorisation safety surveillance (PASS) study was conducted, with an overall aim to examine the use of FEBT in relation to their safety as prescribed in primary care in England. One of the exploratory objectives included estimating the prevalence of aberrant behaviours during FEBT treatment.Objective: To determine the feasibility of estimating the prevalence of risk factors associated with dependence on starting treatment and aberrant behaviours in patients during treatment with a prototypical abuse liable substance (fentanyl), as based on the application of an existing index (the Chabal criteria).Methods: Data were collected as part of the M-PEM PASS study; exposure and outcome data (including risk factors for dependence and aberrant behaviours based on behavioural not clinical manifestations) were derived from questionnaires sent to primary care physicians in England during April 2008 to June 2011. For the exploratory objective of interest, descriptive statistics and simple (non-weighted) risk scores were constructed on aggregate counts (score ≥3 considered 'high-risk'). Supplementary analyses explored the relationship between the two indices and the characteristics of patients with aberrant behaviours and those without (crude odds ratios plus 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated).Results: In a cohort of 551 patients, the prevalence of at least one pre-existing risk factor for dependence was 26% (n = 145), whilst the frequency of aberrant behaviours observed during treatment was 8% (n = 46). Patients with aberrant behaviours had several different characteristics to patients without. The two indices were associated (χ (2) df (20) = 58.72, p < 0.001), but a high-dependence risk-factor score provided a poor indication of high aberrant behaviour risk; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.58 (95% CI 0.41, 0.74).Limitations: Study limitations included subjectivity in relation to physicians identifying aberrant behaviours, and under-reporting thereof in PASS observational study designs. The presence of these criteria does not confirm misuse, but should be considered as a signal of problematic opioid misuse, which requires investigation. Further research is needed to develop a more robust analytical construct.Conclusion: In this PASS study, the prevalence of at least one pre-existing risk factor for dependence was 26%, whilst the frequency of aberrant behaviours observed during treatment was 8%. Patients with aberrant behaviours had several different characteristics to patients without. This study demonstrates the feasibility of the systematic collection of physician reports of risk factors for dependence and aberrant behaviours to facilitate the development of risk scores, using these reports to support the post-marketing risk management of products with misuse potential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Varenicline (Champix), launched in the UK in December 2006, is indicated for the treatment of smoking cessation in adults (≥18 years of age). In 2008, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the UK issued a warning suggesting that varenicline was associated with disparate neuropsychiatric symptoms, including depression, suicidal thoughts and behaviour. In response to this regulatory warning, the Drug Safety Research Unit conducted a modified prescription-event monitoring (M-PEM) study to monitor the safety of varenicline. Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence and examine the pattern of neuropsychiatric events reported to general practitioners (GPs) in England during the immediate postmarketing period for varenicline. Methods: A postmarketing surveillance study was conducted using the observational cohort technique of M-PEM. Patients were identified from dispensed prescriptions issued by primary care physicians between December 2006 and March 2007. Data on exposure, previous history of psychiatric illness and events reported during and after treatment were collected from questionnaires. In order to determine whether hazards for neuropsychiatric events of interest (depression, anxiety, aggression, suicidal ideation, non-fatal self-harm) were non-constant over time (which could indicate a possible association with the drug), the pattern of events was examined by plotting the smoothed hazard function estimate and then fitting a Weibull model. The Weibull model shape parameter (β) and 95 % confidence interval were used as a test for a non-constant hazard function (where a value of 1 indicates a constant hazard over time). In addition to this analysis, the difference in incidence densities (IDs) between month 1 and months 2-3 were calculated and compared. Results: The cohort comprised of 12,159 patients (median age 47 years [interquartile range 19]; 56.9 % [ n = 6924 female]). The number of events reported during treatment, reason for stopping, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and the p-value for the Weibull shape parameter were as follows: depression ( n = 94; 42; 19; p = 0.144); anxiety ( n = 94; 49; 9; p = 0.009); aggression ( n = 7; 4; 2; p = 0.465); suicidal ideation ( n = 8; 4; 1; p = 0.989) and non-fatal self-harm ( n = 5; 1; 0; p = 0.771). No differences in the IDs between months 1 and months 2-3 were found for any of the events. Conclusion: Whilst between 7 and 17 % of neuropsychiatric events were attributed to the drug by GPs and approximately 20-50 % were given as reasons for stopping, no signal was raised using the ID differences approach, and only anxiety was flagged as a potential signal for an ADR using the Weibull model. The signal for anxiety requires further evaluation to determine whether the drug plays a part in the development of anxiety or whether it is a withdrawal symptom caused by smoking cessation. Analysis methods will lack power when the numbers of events are low even when a large number of participants are included in the study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Modafinil (Provigil) was marketed in the UK in 1998 to promote wakefulness in the treatment of narcolepsy. In April 2004, the licence was extended to include chronic pathological conditions; 2 years later, the prescription of modafinil was restricted to patients with shift work sleep disorder, narcolepsy and obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome. Following a recent review of the safety data, the licence has been further restricted to only treat patients with narcolepsy. The review highlighted the degree of off-label usage of modafinil, including patients with multiple sclerosis.Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the safety profile of modafinil in real-world clinical usage and across a range of prescribing indications, including multiple sclerosis.Methods: The study was conducted using the observational cohort technique of Modified Prescription-Event Monitoring. Patients were identified from dispensed prescriptions issued by primary care physicians from July 2004 to August 2005. Patient demographics and information on prescribing behaviour were included in the questionnaire sent to the prescribing general practitioner (GP) 6 months after the initial prescription for each patient. The questionnaire sought data on any events that patient may have experienced during that time, reasons for stopping treatment with modafinil, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), potential interaction with contraceptives, and pregnancies. Incidence densities (IDs) were calculated for all events, and stratified according to indication and dose. Specific events were evaluated by requesting further information.Results: Of the 4,023 questionnaires sent to GPs, 2,416 were returned (response rate 60.1 %). Of these, only those patients issued modafinil after April 2004 (with the associated broadening of the indications for treatment) were included in the study, resulting in a final cohort of 1,096 patients: 497 (45.3 %) male, median age of 52 years (interquartile range [IQR] 41-63), and 599 (54.7 %) female, median age of 47 years (IQR 38-57). Nine patients were aged 16 years or younger; no serious skin reactions were reported in this group. Thirty-four percent of the cohort had an indication of multiple sclerosis. In this study, the majority of the clinical events that were most frequently reported as ADRs or reasons for stopping or that occurred in month 1 have been previously documented with modafinil. The results of the study show that less than half of the women of child-bearing potential were established on a recommended contraceptive programme; three women became pregnant whilst taking modafinil and the oral contraceptive pill. Stratification of IDs by dose revealed certain additional events occurred during month 1 of treatment at the higher dose only. Assessment of individual cases of cardiac, psychiatric and skin events indicated causal associations with modafinil.Conclusions: This study provides important additional safety data on the use of modafinil in patients in 'real-world' use, including those for whom the prescribing indication is outside the terms of licence, as per recent changes to the licensed indications for treatment. In addition to safety data, our study provides useful utilization data. Results from this study indicate that a significant number of women of child-bearing potential had not been commenced on appropriate contraceptive programmes prior to starting modafinil. There were three pregnancies that occurred whilst taking contraception, highlighting the necessity of ensuring effective contraceptive cover for women during and after stopping treatment with modafinil. Analysis of the data showed that the majority of events reported as ADRs or reasons for stopping and ranked events during the first month of treatment had been previously documented with the use of modafinil. Stratification of events according to dose revealed a number of events that occurred at the higher dose only, including serious events such as psychosis. The targeted events for which causality assessments were undertaken confirmed the potential of modafinil to induce certain types of events in individual patients, including cardiac and psychiatric events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In 2005, spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to the UK's Yellow Card Scheme (YCS) was extended to include patient reports. Here, we investigate the potential pharmacovigilance impact of patient reporting.Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate the relative contribution of patient reporting to signal detection through disproportionality analysis.Methods: Data were analysed from all reports submitted directly to the YCS between October 2005 and September 2007. Three datasets of drug-ADR pairs were created: one for patient reports, one for healthcare professional (HCP) reports and one for all reports combined. The proportional reporting ratio (PRR) method was used to identify signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs) in each dataset. The number of SDRs identified from patient and HCP reports were compared, as well as the type of ADR and suspect drug involved. A sensitivity analysis was performed to examine how combining the patient and HCP reports may affect the SDRs identified.Results: Data were received for 5,180 patient and 20,949 HCP reports, relating to 16,566 and 28,775 drug-ADR pairs, respectively, with 4,340 (10.6 %) pairs found in both datasets. A significantly higher proportion of the SDRs identified from HCP reports involved reactions classified as serious by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), compared with patient reports (n = 931, 48.0 % vs. n = 185, 28.5 %), or involved newly marketed drugs (n = 596, 30.7 % vs. n = 71, 10.9 %). The proportion of SDRs assessed as not listed on the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) was similar in each group (~15 %, based on a random sample). After combining the patient and HCP reports, 278 (~11 %) of the SDRs identified when each group was analysed separately no longer met the SDR criteria, including 12 potentially serious ADRs not listed on the product's SPC. On the other hand, the combined dataset identified an additional 508 SDRs that were not identified when patient or HCP reports were analysed separately. Approximately 10 % (n = 47) of these additional SDRs were assessed as serious ADRs and were not listed on the product's SPC.Conclusions: Although this study is limited to the UK experience, overall, the results suggest that patient reporting may provide a positive complementary contribution to that of HCPs. Patient reporting may make an important contribution to drug safety by identifying different SDRs not identified from HCP reports alone. The combination of reports from patients and HCPs, however, when used for the purposes of signal detection through disproportionality analysis, may result in the loss of some information. One possible strategy is to conduct such analyses using reports from patients and HCPs combined, as well as separately for each group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Levocetirizine was launched onto the UK market in September 2001. It is indicated for symptomatic treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR), including persistent AR and chronic idiopathic urticaria.Objective: The aim of the study was to monitor the safety of levocetirizine prescribed in the primary care setting in England, in the immediate postmarketing period.Methods: Exposure data were derived from dispensed prescriptions written by primary care physicians (general practitioners [GPs]) for levocetirizine (November 2001-November 2002): patient demographic, indication, pattern of use and outcome (event) data from enhanced prescription-event monitoring (PEM) questionnaires (with additional questions to gather further relevant information) returned by GPs. Incidence density observation rates (IDobs) [number of first reports/1000 patient-months] between months 1 and 2 (IDobs(m1/m2)) were compared for the whole cohort and by groups defined by indication and pattern of use.Results: The cohort comprised 12 367 patients (median age 37 years [interquartile range 22-55]; 58% female). The most frequent indication was AR (67%; n = 8275). After 2 months, 35.7% (n = 2414) of patients were still taking levocetirizine. 'Condition improved' was the most common event and reason for stopping treatment. Headache/migraine was uncommon but associated with starting treatment (IDobs(m1/m2) 2.4 [95% CI 1.1, 6.0]), as was drowsiness/sedation (IDobs(m1/m2) 11.5 [95% CI 4.2, 43.9]). Cardiovascular events occurred rarely or very rarely, as did most central and peripheral nervous system events. No serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported. Events related to effectiveness were more frequent in month 1 than month 2 for all patient subgroups.Conclusions: This postmarketing surveillance study shows that levocetirizine is well tolerated when used in general practice in England. No previously unrecognized ADRs were detected. This study highlights how modifications to PEM, such as additional questions, are contributing to the evaluation of drug utilization factors in relation to risks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prescription-Event Monitoring (PEM) is a well established postmarketing surveillance technique designed to monitor the overall safety of newly marketed medicines as used in real-life clinical practice, usually in cohorts of at least 10 000 patients. At the Drug Safety Research Unit in the UK we are now moving towards a more targeted safety surveillance known as Modified PEM (M-PEM). These studies combine the advantages of conventional PEM studies (in monitoring general safety and identification of unexpected risks of a medicine) with that of a more targeted safety study that addresses specific questions (to better understand known or partially known risks with a medicine). Through the use of enhanced data collection questionnaires, M-PEM expands the range of applications of conventional PEM, which include more detailed characterization of real-life drug use, adherence to prescribing recommendations and targeted analysis of events requiring special monitoring by regulatory authorities. A particularly useful application is the evaluation of the safety of a medicine in special populations or subgroups (e.g. patients switching from another therapy or patients with a particular risk factor) or following important changes in the product's lifecycle (e.g. a licensing or formulation change).M-PEM studies therefore have an important contribution to make to pharmacovigilance and the risk management of medicines by providing valuable information on the use of new medications under real-life situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Marketing authorization for rimonabant was withdrawn in October 2008, mainly because the psychiatric adverse effects could not be addressed by further risk minimization.Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the risk of major and minor depressive episodes in the 6 months prior to and the 6 months after starting treatment with rimonabant.Methods: We conducted a before and after study using the observational cohort technique of Modified Prescription Event Monitoring to compare the risk of major and minor depressive episodes in new users of rimonabant reported in the 6 months before to the 6 months after starting treatment with rimonabant. Patients were identified from dispensed prescriptions issued by primary care physicians from June 2006 to October 2008. Patient demographics and information on depressive episodes were requested 6 months after the date of the first prescription for each patient. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated by comparing before and after events using a matched analysis.Results: The cohort comprised 10,011 patients. The number of patients who had major depressive episodes before and after starting treatment were 147 and 168, respectively (RR 1.14; 95% CI 0.94, 1.39) and the number of patients who had minor depressive episodes were 825 and 829, respectively (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.93, 1.10). For patients who had a previous history of psychiatric illness (n = 1132), 91 and 73, respectively, experienced major depressive episodes (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.62, 1.03), and 367 and 220, respectively, experienced minor depressive episodes (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.53, 0.68). For patients without a previous history of psychiatric illness (n = 8879), 56 and 95, respectively, experienced major depressive episodes (RR 1.7; 95% CI 1.2, 2.3), and 458 and 609, respectively, experienced minor depressive episodes (RR 1.33; 95% CI 1.20, 1.48).Conclusions: When comparing all patients in the cohort, there was no increased risk of developing a depressive episode whilst taking rimonabant. However, when considering subsets of patients with and without a previous history of psychiatric illness, the risk profiles were different. In patients without a previous history of psychiatric illness, there were more depressive episodes in the 6 months after starting treatment compared with the 6 months before starting treatment with rimonabant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Using postmarketing pharmacovigilance data collected shortly after market authorization of lamotrigine in the UK, a study was conducted to compare the adverse event (AE) profiles of children and adults taking lamotrigine, using modified signal detection methods.Methods: Data from the lamotrigine Prescription Event Monitoring (PEM) study, an observational cohort study, were stratified by age and examined using summary statistics for adverse drug reactions (ADRs), reasons for stopping treatment, deaths and follow-up information. Incidence densities of AEs in children (0-17 years) and adults (> or =18 years) in the first month of treatment were compared with months 2-6 to examine whether the AE rates were different in these two periods. AE rates in children were compared with those in adults (proportional reporting ratio [PRR] and incidence rate ratios), to compare the AE profiles between these age groups.Results: The cohort included 2457 children and 7379 adults. Differences in the AE profiles between children and adults were observed. Rash (PRR 1.2) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (PRR 4.5) were more commonly reported in children, and confusion more frequently in adults (PRR 6.3). In children, 33% of ADRs were reported to the Regulatory Authority compared with 44% in adults. A higher proportion of children stopped treatment due to lack of effectiveness (45% vs 38%). No deaths were attributed to lamotrigine.Conclusions: This study demonstrated that signal detection methods can be used to detect quantitative and qualitative differences in the AE profiles between the first children and adults taking a newly licensed drug. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Strontium ranelate is indicated for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. An association between strontium ranelate and venous thromboembolism (VTE) was identified in an analysis of phase III clinical trials.Objective: To estimate the incidence of VTE in patients within the strontium ranelate (Protelos(R)) Prescription-Event Monitoring (PEM) study cohort during the first 12 months after starting treatment.Methods: Patients in this analysis were identified from dispensed prescriptions that had been issued by general practitioners (GPs) in England for strontium ranelate between October 2004 and January 2008. For each individual patient, a Green Form questionnaire was sent to their GP 12 months after the date of the first prescription issued for strontium ranelate, requesting information about the patient including start and stop dates of treatment (if stopped), age, sex, indication, any history of VTE events, reasons for stopping and whether the patient had any events since starting the drug. VTE was defined as reports of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). The crude incidence of VTE was calculated for events that occurred during the first 12 months after starting treatment (plus 30 days after stopping), with 95% Poisson exact CIs for the whole cohort, and subsets defined by age and past history of VTE.Results: The final analysis cohort consisted of 10 782 patients. Where specified, mean age was 73.3 years (SD 11.45) [n = 10 696]; 9833 (91.3%) were female and 934 (8.7%) were male. Where the history of VTE was specified, 233 patients (2.6%) had a history of VTE prior to starting. In the first 12-month period, there were 48 incident reports of VTE (DVT or PE) during treatment (or within 30 days of stopping) in the cohort, with 7696.89 years of exposure, giving a crude incidence rate of VTE of 6.24 cases (95% CI 4.60, 8.27) per 1000 patient-years exposed.Conclusions: This analysis has provided an estimate of the incidence of VTE in patients treated with strontium ranelate in the general practice setting. The rate is similar to estimates in populations of similar age and corresponds to the incidence found in patients from phase III clinical studies and observational cohort studies of strontium ranelate on this topic. The crude annual incidence rate of VTE in the PEM cohort is higher than the background annual incidence rate found in the UK population, but is similar to estimates in populations of similar age and populations receiving treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Also, we acknowledge the potential for underestimating the incidence in this population. Nevertheless, this analysis contributes to the ongoing postmarketing safety assessment of this product. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Intrinsa is a transdermal testosterone patch that is indicated for use in hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in women who have undergone bilateral oophorectomy and hysterectomy (surgically-induced menopause) receiving concomitant oestrogen therapy.Objective: To describe the utilization characteristics of the patients prescribed testosterone patch (Intrinsa) based on an interim analysis of an ongoing Prescription-Event Monitoring study in England, and to assess, where possible, if the product is being used within the licensed therapeutic indication.Methods: In this interim analysis, patients were identified from dispensed prescriptions that had been issued by general practitioners (GPs) for Intrinsa from March 2007. 'Green form' questionnaires were sent to GPs 6 months following the date of the first prescription for Intrinsa for each individual patient, requesting information including age, sex, start and stop dates of treatment (if stopped), prescribing indication and reasons for stopping. Additional questions were asked regarding the patient's menopausal status and use of concomitant oestrogen therapy.Results: The interim cohort consisted of 756 patients. The majority of patients were reported to be female (746 [98.7%]) with a median (interquartile range) age of 50 years (44-55 years). The most commonly reported indication was the licensed indication of HSDD in 580 patients (76.7%). Just under one-half of the patients (n = 364 [48.1%]) were reported to have been hysterectomized and bilaterally oophorectomized (surgically-induced menopause) prior to starting Intrinsa; 127 patients (16.8%) were naturally menopausal. For 222 patients (29.4%) the GP specified that the patient was not using concomitant oestrogen therapy. Overall, only 219 patients (29.0%) in the cohort were being prescribed Intrinsa according to the manufacturer's recommendations.Conclusions: This study has highlighted that some clinicians are prescribing this product outside the recommended terms of the licence, with less than 30% of patients receiving Intrinsa according to prescribing guidelines. All events experienced by these patients will be analysed to detect any possible adverse events from using Intrinsa outside of the licensed therapeutic indication. The findings support the ongoing postmarketing risk management of the product. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Varenicline tartrate (Champix), a new smoking cessation medicine, was launched in the UK in December 2006. Varenicline is a highly selective partial agonist of the alpha(4)beta(2) nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (alpha(4)beta(2) receptor). The partial agonistic binding leads to alleviation of symptoms of craving and withdrawal, and simultaneously prevents nicotine from binding to the alpha(4)beta(2) receptor thereby causing reduction in the rewarding and reinforcing effects of smoking. Regulatory concerns have arisen about psychiatric events associated with varenicline, including depression, suicidal ideation and changes in behaviour/emotion.Aim: To present the interim results of an ongoing study by the Drug Safety Research Unit (DSRU) monitoring the safety of varenicline.Methods: The observational cohort study is being conducted to study the postmarketing safety of varenicline, using modified prescription-event monitoring (PEM) methodology. Patients are identified from dispensed prescriptions issued by general practitioners (GPs) from December 2006. Demographic, clinical event (during the course and 1 month after stopping varenicline, reasons for discontinuing and suspected adverse drug reactions [ADRs] to varenicline) and drug utilization data are collected from detailed study-specific questionnaires posted to GPs at least 4 months after the date of first prescription for each patient. Event incidence densities (IDs; number of first reports of an event/1000 patient-months of exposure) are calculated.Results: The interim cohort comprises 2,682 patients: median age 47 years (interquartile range [IQR] 38-56), 60.7% females (n = 1627). Nausea/vomiting was the most frequent clinical reason for stopping varenicline (n = 91; 35.3% of clinical reasons) and the most frequently reported suspected ADR to varenicline (n = 60, 50.9% of patients for whom an ADR was reported). The most frequently reported psychiatric events (causality not implied) during treatment included (n; % of cohort): sleep disorder (43; 1.6%), anxiety (33; 1.2%), depression (29; 1.1%), abnormal dreams (26; 1.0%) and mood change (17; 0.6%). Two cases of attempted suicide were reported during treatment with varenicline (one patient took an overdose of a benzodiazepine with alcohol, the other slashed their wrist). Both these patients had previous history of psychiatric illness and precipitating factors for the event.Conclusion: This study reflects 'real life' use of varenicline. Nausea/vomiting - the event most frequently reported as an ADR and as reason for stopping treatment - is listed in the UK Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC). The most frequently reported psychiatric events are listed in the UK SPC. All patients with suicidal events either had a past medical history of psychiatric illness prior to starting varenicline and/or a precipitating factor for the event. Clinicians should closely monitor patients with pre-existing psychiatric illness who are taking varenicline. Further evaluation of events of interest including psychiatric events is ongoing. Results presented are expected to change as the cohort size increases. Results of this study should be taken into account together with other clinical and pharmacoepidemiological studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hypoglycaemia is an acute complication associated with intensive treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus. This complication poses a major challenge in diabetes management. Furthermore, severe hypoglycaemia may be life threatening. Although hypoglycaemia is more often associated with insulin treatment, oral hypoglycaemic agents have the potential to trigger hypoglycaemia.Aim: The aim of this study was to quantify the incidence of hypoglycaemic events and to describe the pattern of these incident events during the first 9 months of treatment with four oral antidiabetic drugs, rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, nateglinide and repaglinide, prescribed in general practice in England.Methods: We used data collected for prescription-event monitoring (PEM) studies of rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, nateglinide and repaglinide. PEM is an observational, non-interventional, incept cohort study. Observation time for each patient and incidence rate (IR) per 1000 patient-years of treatment for hypoglycaemia was calculated for each drug cohort. Smoothed hazard estimates were plotted over time. Case/non-case analysis was performed to describe and compare patients who had at least one hypoglycaemic event in the first 9 months of treatment with those who did not.Results: The total number of patients included in the analysis was 14,373, 12,768, 4,549 and 5,727 in rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, nateglinide and repaglinide cohorts, respectively. From these, 276 patients experienced at least one episode of hypoglycaemia. The IR was between 50% and 100% higher in patients receiving treatment with meglitinides compared with those treated with the thiazolidinediones (TZDs) [IR = 9.94, 9.64, 15.71 and 20.32 per 1,000 patient-years for rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, nateglinide and repaglinide, respectively]. The plot of the hazard function and the estimated shape parameter from the Weibull regression model showed that pioglitazone, nateglinide and repaglinide had non-constant (decreasing) hazards over time, whereas the hazard for rosiglitazone-treated patients was approximately constant over time. Nateglinide and repaglinide had similar shape hazard function, indicating a significantly higher number of hypoglycaemic episodes shortly after starting treatment. For women treated with TZDs, hypoglycaemia was reported more frequently than for men.Conclusion: This analysis shows that the frequency of reported hypoglycaemia within the study cohorts was relatively low. The rates of hypoglycaemia were not equal between drug classes. Treatment with nateglinide or repaglinide was characterized by a higher incidence of hypoglycaemia at the beginning of treatment. Further investigation is necessary to assess whether women treated with TZDs are more prone to hypoglycaemia than men. Findings from this study should be taken into account with other clinical and pharmacoepidemiological studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pioglitazone is an antidiabetic drug that belongs to the thiazolidinedione (TZD) class of insulin-sensitizing agents. Adverse events to pioglitazone of potential severity are listed in the 'special warnings and special precautions for use' section of the pioglitazone summary of product characteristics (SPC), with recommendations for monitoring and management.Objective: To describe the risk management and outcomes of recognized TZD class effects in patients prescribed pioglitazone.Methods: An observational study of risk management and event outcomes for the adverse events of cardiac failure, fluid retention/oedema, weight gain, anaemia and abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) was performed. Patients were identified from within a prescription-event monitoring (PEM) postmarketing cohort of first-users of pioglitazone. Patients with pre-existing events or alternative causes, or with no possibility of collecting further information, were excluded. Outcomes included (i) the method of detection of the adverse event, i.e. whether the patient or the prescriber identified the problem; (ii) whether responsibility for risk management was taken at a primary- or secondary-care level; (iii) interventions taken to manage the event, including discontinuation of treatment; (iv) resolution and/or other outcomes of the event; and (v) general practitioner (GP) opinion of relatedness of the event to pioglitazone.Results: Acute events such as cardiac failure and oedema were more likely to be detected by the patient presenting with the event rather than at regular follow-up. GPs were more likely to take responsibility for management of abnormal LFTs, anaemia and oedema events, whereas hospital admissions occurred mainly in patients with cardiac failure (45.3%). Pioglitazone was stopped in more than 50% of each type of event, apart from anaemia. Oedema events were the most likely to resolve (87.6%) and anaemia the least likely (42.9%). Oedema events were the most likely to be attributed to the drug by GPs, whereas cardiac failure was the event least attributed to pioglitazone.Conclusions: Timely drug withdrawal and/or interventions such as corrective treatment or referral to a specialist can lead to successful resolution of class-effect adverse events of pioglitazone. Regular follow-up of patients on antidiabetic agents is essential to detect certain events, but more acute events are more likely to be reported spontaneously. Treatment options for patients with diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular risk factors are limited, requiring careful benefit-risk assessment of pioglitazone use in these patients and careful monitoring for signs of worsening cardiac function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the UK, the licence for carvedilol was extended in 1998 to include symptomatic heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class II and III heart failure) with the recommendation that initiation and up-titration should be under the supervision of a hospital physician. A post-marketing surveillance study was conducted to address the UK regulatory authority's request for monitoring the use and safety of carvedilol prescribed for heart failure in clinical practice.Aim: To investigate adherence to risk management recommendations for the use of carvedilol for heart failure, monitor how patients' subsequent care was managed and collect event data to evaluate the safety profile of carvedilol used for the treatment of heart failure.Methods: An observational cohort study using a modified prescription-event monitoring technique identified patients from dispensed primary care prescriptions in England (August 1999 to June 2001). An eligibility questionnaire was used to identify patients who had been prescribed carvedilol for heart failure for the first time after 31 July 1999. Up to three follow-up questionnaires were sent to the prescribers of eligible patients, requesting demographic information, dosage, supervision of treatment, status of cardiac failure and event information.Results: 2311 patients met the eligibility criteria. For 1666 patients, one or more valid follow-up questionnaires were returned: 68.5% were male; male median age 66 years; female median age 72 years; the observation period was up to 3 years. Hospital physicians supervised initiation of treatment and first up-titration in 85.6% and 61.4% of patients, respectively. 49.2% of patients were prescribed the recommended starting dosage of carvedilol (6.25 mg/day). Approximately 25% of patients started on a lower dose than recommended, and the same proportion were prescribed a higher dose. NYHA status of cardiac failure between starting treatment and the third questionnaire improved for 39.5% of patients, deteriorated for 10.9%, and 11.7% of those for whom NYHA status was given died. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported for 2.4% of patients; the most commonly reported ADR was malaise/lassitude. Overall, 27.1% of patients stopped taking carvedilol. None of the 163 deaths were attributed to carvedilol.Conclusions: Regulatory guidelines for the use and risk management of carvedilol in heart failure were mostly followed, and most patients appeared to benefit from treatment with carvedilol for heart failure. Malaise/lassitude was the main reason for discontinuing treatment. Further investigations may be warranted to examine the prescribing of carvedilol at lower than recommended doses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pioglitazone is an antidiabetic drug that targets insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by stimulating the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma. Pioglitazone belongs to a class of drugs called thiazolidinediones (TZDs) and was launched in the UK in November 2000.Objective: To monitor, using prescription-event monitoring, the post-marketing safety of pioglitazone, which is prescribed in primary care in England.Methods: An observational cohort study in which patients were identified from dispensed prescriptions issued by primary-care physicians/general practitioners (GPs) between November 2000 and June 2001. Information on demographics, the use of pioglitazone, clinical event data, events suspected as adverse drug reactions, reasons for stopping the drug and cause of death (if appropriate) were collected using questionnaires posted to GPs at least 8 months after the date of first prescription for each patient. Event incidence densities (IDs) [number of first reports of an event/1000 patient-months of exposure] were calculated.Results: The cohort comprised 12 772 patients (median age 62 years); 53.1% were males. The most frequent starting daily dose of pioglitazone was either 15 mg or 30 mg (n = 10 298). Pioglitazone/metformin was the most frequently used combination reported (n = 4029). Of the 3690 patients who stopped treatment, 1143 stopped due to reasons related to poor glycaemic control. 'Oedema/fluid retention' (n = 121) and 'weight gain' (n = 118) also appeared high on the list of reasons for discontinuing. 'Malaise/lassitude' and 'nausea/vomiting' were the most frequently reported suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with pioglitazone. Specific clinical events considered as early onset events with pioglitazone were: 'malaise/lassitude', 'nausea/vomiting', 'dizziness', 'headache/migraine', 'diarrhoea', 'weight gain' and 'abnormal liver function test'.Conclusion: Pioglitazone was considered to be a reasonably well tolerated drug, with the main reasons for discontinuing being related to the drug not being effective. The frequency of individual ADRs reported in this study did not exceed the frequency in the summary of product characteristics (SPC) for pioglitazone. However, amongst the frequently reported suspected ADRs, 'nausea/vomiting' and 'diarrhoea' are not listed in the SPC. Further research is required to assess whether the risk of myocardial infarction and deaths due to cardiovascular causes is a class effect of the thiazolidinediones. Results from this study should be taken into account with other clinical and pharmacoepidemiological studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Esomeprazole, the S-isomer of omeprazole, was launched in the UK in September 2000. The first proton pump inhibitor, omeprazole, has been marketed in the UK for over 10 years. However, the adverse event database of newly marketed drugs is limited, and it is only after widespread clinical use that the adverse effect profile of a drug is ascertained more comprehensively. This study aims to monitor the safety of esomeprazole prescribed in the primary care setting in England using prescription-event monitoring (PEM).Methods: A postmarketing surveillance study using the observational cohort technique of PEM. Patients were identified from dispensed prescriptions for esomeprazole issued by general practitioners between September 2000 and April 2001. Questionnaires ('green forms') requesting clinical event data on these patients were sent to prescribers approximately 6 months after the date of the first dispensed prescription for each individual patient. Incidence densities (IDs), expressed as the number of first reports of an event/1000 patient-months of exposure (PME), were calculated. Significant differences between IDs for events reported in the first month (ID1) and the following 5 months (ID2-6) of exposure were regarded as potential signals. Other methods for signal detection such as medical evaluation of selected events and evaluation of reasons for stopping were also applied.Results: Green forms containing clinically useful information for 11 595 patients (median age 56 years; 53.2% female) were received. Diarrhoea was the event with the highest ID1 in month 1 (8.0 per 1000 patient months of exposure). Adverse events that occurred significantly more often in the first month of treatment with esomeprazole compared with months 2-6 included diarrhoea, nausea/vomiting, abdominal pain, dyspepsia, headache/migraine, intolerance, malaise/lassitude, pruritus, unspecified adverse effects and abnormal sensation.Conclusions: The safety profile of esomeprazole was consistent with the prescribing information and experience reported in the literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction A modified prescription-event monitoring (PEM) study was conducted to examine the safety of the introduction of the metered dose inhaler (MDI) Flixotide EvohalerTM (fluticasone with the propellant HFA 134a). Methods Patients were identified from the first NHS prescriptions dispensed in England for Flixotide EvohalerTM. Postal questionnaires were sent to the prescribing doctor, requesting information including: demographic characteristics, severity of indication, concomitant medication, event data 3 months prior to and 3 months after the first prescription, and any reasons for stopping Flixotide. Pregnancies, deaths and selected events were followed up. Incidence density ratios (IDRs) were calculated to compare event rates 3 months before and 3 months after the introduction of Flixotide EvohalerTM. Results The cohort comprised 13 413 patients that were prescribed Flixotide EvohalerTM. The response rate was 64.0%. When the pre- and post-exposure periods were compared fewer patients had events in the post-exposure period, and there was no significant difference in the length of courses of oral steroid use. Eighteen patients experienced an event within 1 hour of using Flixotide EvohalerTM; these were minor with the exception of one case of angioneurotic facial oedema. Six of these events were assessed as possibly related to Flixotide EvohalerTM. During the study period there were an additional 13 patients with events assessed as possibly related to Flixotide EvohalerTM, including two reports of allergic reactions. Discussion The results suggest that the transition to Flixotide EvohalerTM was generally well tolerated. The modified methodology has contributed to the risk management of the introduction of this product. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The safety of the atypical antipsychotic quetiapine as used in general practice in England was examined by prescription-event monitoring (PEN). Patients were identified from dispensed National Health Service (NHS) prescriptions issued by general practitioners (GPs) for quetiapine between October 1997 and July 1999. The outcome data were event reports obtained by sending questionnaires ('green forms') to the prescribing doctor at least 6 months after the first prescription for an individual patient. Green forms with clinically useful information on 1728 patients (median age 39 years (IQR 30-56); 53% female) were received. The most frequently reported event during the first month of treatment was 'drowsiness/sedation' (47; 3% cohort). This was also the most frequently reported specified adverse drug reaction (ADR) to quetiapine (7; 11% of 65 reported ADRs) and the highest reported clinical reason for stopping quetiapine (51; 6% of the 734 reported reasons for stopping). There was a low incidence of extrapyramidal disease (21 during treatment, 1% of cohort) and hyperprolactinaemia (three during treatment, 0.2%) in this study. Three cases of diabetes mellitus in this cohort were reported to be a new diagnosis. Six pregnancies were reported during treatment with quetiapine, five of which were exposed during the first trimester only. There were four live births with no reported congenital abnormalities. Fifty-six deaths were reported during this study (3% cohort). The most frequently reported causes of death related to the cardiovascular (18) and respiratory (15) systems. The results of this post-marketing surveillance study demonstrated that quetiapine is generally well-tolerated when used in general practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate cases of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) reported in a prescription event monitoring study of Yasmin®, an oral contraceptive. Reports of DVT/PE and events suggestive of DVT/PE were followed up by questionnaire. Thirteen cases (DVT five; PE eight), each with possible risk factor(s), were identified in 15 645 females using Yasmin®. Applying complete case analysis, the crude incidence rate was 13.7 cases per 10 000 woman-years (95% confidence interval 7.3, 23.4). Yasmin is associated with venous thromboembolism. An incidence rate has been calculated, but this may be subject to bias and should be interpreted with caution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Rofecoxib, a selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor, was a widely marketed drug that was used for relief of pain and inflammation in arthritic conditions. It was withdrawn from the market worldwide in September 2004 because of an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Celecoxib, which belongs to the same class of drugs, is now under scrutiny for the risk of similar events. The objective of our study was to compare the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) [symptomatic and complicated upper GI] events and thromboembolic (cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and peripheral venous) events reported for patients prescribed rofecoxib or celecoxib in primary care.Methods: A retrospective analysis of selected events was conducted using data collected from previously conducted prescription-event monitoring (PEM) studies for rofecoxib and celecoxib. PEM is an observational cohort technique. Exposure data were derived from dispensed prescriptions for rofecoxib (July-November 1999) and celecoxib (May-December 2000) that were written by primary care general practitioners in England. Outcome data were clinical events and information on potential risk factors reported on simple questionnaires (posted to prescribers approximately 9 months after the date of the first prescription). Incidence rates of the first event during treatment within each thromboembolic and GI group were calculated during the 270 days after the patient started receiving either of the drugs; crude and adjusted rate ratios (RR) were calculated for rofecoxib compared with celecoxib using Poisson regression modelling.Results: The rofecoxib and celecoxib PEM cohorts contained 15 268 and 17 458 patients, respectively. For the GI event groups, the adjusted RRs for rofecoxib compared with celecoxib were: 1.21 (95% CI 1.09, 1.36) for symptomatic upper GI events and 1.60 (95% CI 0.95, 2.70) for complicated upper GI conditions. For the thromboembolic event groups, the adjusted RRs were: 1.04 (95% CI 0.50, 2.17) for cardiovascular thromboembolic events; 1.43 (95% CI 0.86, 2.38) for cerebrovascular thromboembolic events; and 0.36 (95% CI 0.01, 1.34) for peripheral venous thromboembolic events.Conclusions: This study was a retrospective comparison of PEM studies conducted for rofecoxib and celecoxib. For symptomatic upper GI events, a 21% increase in the relative rate was found for rofecoxib users compared with celecoxib users after adjusting for identified risk factors. For complicated upper GI events, no statistically significant difference in the incidence was observed between rofecoxib and celecoxib users after adjusting for identified risk factors. For the three thromboembolic event groups, no evidence of a statistically significant difference between rofecoxib and celecoxib users was found after adjusting for identified risk factors. This study contributes to the understanding of the association between COX-2 inhibitors and thromboembolic events. However, it should be borne in mind that we had information on only a limited number of confounding variables for thromboembolic events. Further research is required to fully understand the risks and benefits of using celecoxib and other COX-2 inhibitors. Meanwhile, doctors should be cautious when prescribing these products, particularly to patients with risk factors for developing thromboembolic events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]