The isometric mid-thigh pull test permits the collection of multiple metrics related to athletic performance, such as peak force (PF), time to peak force (TTPF), and force at specific time points (e.g., 100, 150, 200 ms). However, practitioners are often constrained to a weight room setting due to the stationary nature of squat racks, making field-based athlete testing difficult. The purpose of this study was to compare force-time variables collected during a maximal effort isometric mid-thigh pull performed within a custom-built squat rack and barbell-based system (IMTP) to an isometric pull performed on a dual-handle portable device (DHP). A commercially available force platform (Sparta Science, Menlo Park, CA, USA) which samples at a rate of 1,000Hz was utilized in both conditions. Twenty recreationally active individuals with ≥2 years (Mean±SD; 7.1±2.3 yrs) of resistance training experience participated in the present study. Following a standardized warm-up participants performed three maximal effort isometric tests on both the IMTP and DHP, in a randomized counterbalanced manner. A large correlation was observed for PF (r=0.844, p<0.001), with no significant difference between systems (IMTP = 2107.9 ± 509.8, DHP = 2005.2 ± 543.7 N). However, PF values showed 5% systematic error for DHP. In addition, Force at 250 ms significantly differed (IMTP = 1474.8 ± 418.8, DHP = 1220.2 ± 380.6 N, p=0.003). Lastly, TTPF varied between systems (IMTP = 2.2 ± 1.2, DHP = 2.9 ± 0.9 s, p=0.012) and was not significantly correlated (r=0.343). Isometric strength testing using DHP appears to be a near valid method for the assessment of maximal effort isometric strength. Kinetic measures from portable rigs should be interpreted with caution when compared to IMTP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]