Search

Objectives. Professional societies, ethics institutes, and the courts have recommended principles to guide the care of children with life-threatening conditions; however, little is known about the degree to which pediatric care providers are aware of or in agreement with these guidelines. The study’s objectives were to determine the extent to which physicians and nurses in critical care, hematology/oncology, and other subspecialties are in agreement with one another and with widely published ethical recommendations regarding the withholding and withdrawing of life support, the provision of adequate analgesia, and the role of parents in end-of-life decision-making. Methods. Three children’s hospitals and 4 general hospitals with PICUs in eastern, southwestern, and southern parts of the United States were surveyed. This population-based sample was composed of attending physicians, house officers, and nurses who cared for children (age: 1 month to 18 years) with life-threatening conditions in PICUs or in medical, surgical, or hematology/oncology units, floors, or departments. Main outcome measures included concerns of conscience, knowledge and beliefs, awareness of published guidelines, and agreement or disagreement with guidelines. Results. A total of 781 clinicians were sampled, including 209 attending physicians, 116 house officers, and 456 nurses. The overall response rate was 64%. Fifty-four percent of house officers and substantial proportions of attending physicians and nurses reported, “At times, I have acted against my conscience in providing treatment to children in my care.” For example, 38% of critical care attending physicians and 25% of hematology/oncology attending physicians expressed these concerns, whereas 48% of critical care nurses and 38% of hematology/oncology nurses did so. Across specialties, ∼20 times as many nurses, 15 times as many house officers, and 10 times as many attending physicians agreed with the statement, “Sometimes I feel we are saving children who should not be saved,” as agreed with the statement, “Sometimes I feel we give up on children too soon.” However, hematology/oncology attending physicians (31%) were less likely than critical care (56%) and other subspecialty (66%) attending physicians to report, “Sometimes I feel the treatments I offer children are overly burdensome.” Many respondents held views that diverged widely from published recommendations. Despite a lack of awareness of key guidelines, across subspecialties the vast majority of attending physicians (range: 92–98%, depending on specialty) and nurses (range: 83–85%) rated themselves as somewhat to very knowledgeable regarding ethical issues. Conclusions. There is a need for more hospital-based ethics education and more interdisciplinary and cross-subspecialty discussion of inherently complex and stressful pediatric end-of-life cases. Education should focus on establishing appropriate goals of care, as well as on pain management, medically supplied nutrition and hydration, and the appropriate use of paralytic agents. More research is needed on clinicians’ regard for the dead-donor rule.

Today, almost half of all kidney donors in the United States are living. Dr. Robert Truog explains that organ donation by living donors presents a unique ethical dilemma, in that physicians must risk the life of a healthy person to save or improve the life of a patient.

The use of neurological criteria to determine brain death has ethical implications for prospective organ donors. Virtual Mentor is a monthly bioethics journal published by the American Medical Association.

Managing children with diabetes insipidus (DI) in the perioperative period is complicated and frequently associated with electrolyte imbalance compounded by over- or underhydration. In this study the authors developed and prospectively evaluated a multidisciplinary approach to the perioperative management of DI with a comparison to 19 historical control children. Eighteen children either with preoperative DI or undergoing neurosurgical operations associated with a high risk for developing postoperative DI were identified and managed using a standardized protocol. In all patients in whom DI occurred during or after surgery, a continuous intravenous infusion of aqueous vasopressin was initiated and titrated until antidiuresis was established. Intravenous fluids were given as normal saline and restricted to two thirds of the estimated maintenance rate plus amounts necessary to replace blood losses and maintain hemodynamic stability. In all children managed in this fashion, perioperative serum sodium concentrations were generally maintained between 130 and 150 mEq/L, and no adverse consequences of this therapy developed. In the 24-hour period evaluated, the mean change in serum sodium concentrations between the historical controls was 17.6 +/- 9.2 mEq/L versus 8.36 +/- 6.43 mEq/L in those children managed by the protocol. Hyponatremia occurred less frequently in the children managed with this protocol compared with historical controls.

Objective. To determine the frequency, types, sources, and predictors of conflict surrounding the care of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients with prolonged stay.Setting. A tertiary care, university-affiliated PICU in Boston.Participants. All patients admitted over an 11-month period whose stay exceeded 8 days (the 85th percentile length of stay for the PICU under study), and intensive care physicians and nurses who were responsible for their care.Methods. We prospectively identified conflicts by interviewing the treating physicians and nurses at 2 stages during the patients’ PICU stay. All conflicts detected were classified by type (team-family, intrateam, or intrafamily) and source. Using a case-control design, we then identified predictors of conflict through bivariate and multivariate analyses.Results. We enrolled 110 patients based on the length-of-stay criterion. Clinicians identified 55 conflicts involving 51 patients in this group. Hence, nearly one half of all patients followed had a conflict associated with their care. Thirty-three of the conflicts (60%) were team-family, 21 (38%) were intrateam, and the remaining 1 was intrafamily. The most commonly cited sources of team-family conflict were poor communication (48%), unavailability of parents (39%), and disagreements over the care plan (39%). Medicaid insurance status was independently associated with the occurrence of conflict generally (odds ratio = 4.97) and team-family conflict specifically (odds ratio = 7.83).Conclusions. Efforts to reduce and manage conflicts that arise in the care of critically ill children should be sensitive to the distinctive features of these conflicts. Knowledge of risk factors for conflict may also help to target such interventions at the patients and families who need them most.

Background In 1976, the first hospital policies on orders not to resuscitate were published in the medical literature. Since that time, the concept has continued to evolve and evoke much debate. Indeed, few initials in medicine today evoke as much symbolism or controversy as the Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) order. Objective To review the development, implementation, and present standing of the DNR order. Design Review article. Main Results The DNR order concept brought an open decision-making framework to the resuscitation decision and did much to put appropriate restraint on the universal application of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for the dying patient. Yet, even today, many of the early concerns remain. Conclusions After 25 yrs of DNR orders, it remains reasonable to presume consent and attempt resuscitation for people who suffer an unexpected cardiopulmonary arrest or for whom resuscitation may have physiologic effect and for whom no information is available at the time as to their wishes (or those of their surrogate). However, it is not reasonable to continue to rely on such a presumption without promptly and actively seeking to clarify the patient’s (or surrogate’s) wishes. The DNR order, then, remains an inducement to seek the informed patient’s directive.

In The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks , Rebecca Skloot tells the moving story of the woman who was the source of the first immortal cell line (HeLa) ( 1 ). The cells were obtained at Johns Hopkins University in 1951 from biopsies performed during her treatment for cervical cancer. Her physicians did not seek her consent before using her tissue for research, nor did they receive any personal financial gain from the cell line.

Morrisssey (2012) presents a reasonable proposal for expanding viable kidney donation by means of procuring both kidneys prior to withdrawing life support, as an alternative to protocols for donati...

To determine types, sources, and predictors of conflicts among patients with prolonged stay in the ICU.We prospectively identified conflicts by interviewing treating physicians and nurses at two stages during the patients' stays. We then classified conflicts by type and source and used a case-control design to identify predictors of team-family conflicts.Seven medical and surgical ICUs at four teaching hospitals in Boston, USA.All patients admitted to the participating ICUs over an 11-month period whose stay exceeded the 85th percentile length of stay for their respective unit ( n=656).Clinicians identified 248 conflicts involving 209 patients; hence, nearly one-third of patients had conflict associated with their care: 142 conflicts (57%) were team-family disputes, 76 (31%) were intrateam disputes, and 30 (12%) occurred among family members. Disagreements over life-sustaining treatment led to 63 team-family conflicts (44%). Other leading sources were poor communication (44%), the unavailability of family decision makers (15%), and the surrogates' (perceived) inability to make decisions (16%). Nurses detected all types of conflict more frequently than physicians, especially intrateam conflicts. The presence of a spouse reduced the probability of team-family conflict generally (odds ratio 0.64) and team-family disputes over life-sustaining treatment specifically (odds ratio 0.49).Conflict is common in the care of patients with prolonged stays in the ICU. However, efforts to improve the quality of care for critically ill patients that focus on team-family disagreements over life-sustaining treatment miss significant discord in a variety of other areas.

This paper reviews some of the difficulties in implementing perioperative reevaluation of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders and suggests several strategies for perioperative DNR policies. Policies should be written, designed and implemented at the level of the institution, and be sufficiently flexible to permit the tailoring of the perioperative DNR order to the individual patient. Policies should unambiguously state that reevaluation is required, delineate responsibilities for reevaluating the DNR order, state all the available options, define the necessary documentation, and list resources for help.

Objective. To determine whether there is variability in the attitudes and practices of physicians regarding treatment of respiratory failure in children with spinal muscular atrophy type I (SMA type I) and, if so, whether this variation is associated with professional training.Methods. This was a descriptive, cross-sectional survey mailed to a randomly selected subset of the Child Neurology Society, pediatric members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and to the membership of the Pediatric Interest Section of the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. A scenario of a child with SMA type I in respiratory distress was followed by questions that explored practices and attitudes regarding mechanical ventilation.Results. Fifty-seven percent of intensivists (75 of 132), 39% physiatrists (61 of 155), and 34% of neurologists (61 of 155) responded. Specialists differed as to whether they offered and/or recommended respiratory support to patients with SMA type I. Intensivists were less likely to offer and recommend tracheostomy than physiatrists. Intensivists were also significantly less likely than physiatrists to agree with statements supporting the ethical necessity of noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and intubation in the setting of an acute respiratory illness, and NIMV and tracheostomy in the setting of chronic respiratory failure. Although parallel differences were found between physiatrists and neurologists regarding their attitudes toward mechanical ventilation, no significant differences were detected between intensivists and neurologists. Finally, physicians who reported that a high percentage of their patients with SMA type I received “comfort care only” also tended to view mechanical ventilation, ie, use of NIMV for chronic respiratory failure, use of intubation for an acute respiratory infection, and use of tracheostomy for chronic respiratory failure as an unreasonable intervention in most circumstances.Conclusions. We found a wide variation in physician practice regarding the mechanical ventilation of patients with SMA type I. This study suggests a wide variation not only in what is recommended but also in what is actually offered to families of these children. Furthermore, the study suggests that physician training and attitudes affect recommendations regarding mechanical ventilation and ultimately family decision making.

T hese recommendations are intended to provide information and advice for clinicians who deliver end-of-life care in intensive care units (ICUs). The number of deaths that occur in the ICU after the withdrawal of life support is increasing, with one recent survey finding that 90% of patients who die in ICUs now do so after a decision to limit therapy (1). Although there is significant variability in the frequency of withdrawal of life support both within countries (2) and among cultures (3), the general trend is international in scope (4). Nevertheless, most evidence indicates that patients and families remain dissatisfied with the care they receive once a decision has been made to withdraw life support (5). Although intensive care clinicians traditionally have seen their goals as curing disease and restoring health and function, these goals must now expand when necessary to also include assuring patients of a “good death.” Just as developments in knowledge and technology have dramatically enhanced our ability to restore patients to health, similar developments now make it possible for almost all patients to have a death that is dignified and free from pain. The management of patients at the end of life can be divided into two phases. The first concerns the process of shared decision-making that leads from the pursuit of cure or recovery to the pursuit of comfort and freedom from pain. The second concerns the actions that are taken once this shift in goals has been made and focuses on both the humanistic and technical skills that must be enlisted to ensure that the needs of the patient and family are met. Although both of these issues are critically important in end-oflife care, the decision-making process is not unique to the ICU environment and has been addressed by others (6 –11). These recommendations, therefore, do not deal primarily with the process that leads to the decision to forego lifeprolonging treatments but rather focus on the implementation of that decision, with particular emphasis on the ICU environment. This division of the process into two phases is necessarily somewhat artificial. Patients and families do not suddenly switch from the hope for survival and cure to the acceptance of death and pursuit of comfort. This process happens gradually over varying periods of time ranging from hours to weeks. Similarly, the forgoing of life-sustaining treatments rarely happens all at once and is likewise a stepwise process that parallels the shift in goals. Although acknowledging the relationship between the process of decision-making and the corresponding actions, these guidelines will focus on the latter. These recommendations are written from the emerging perspective that palliative care and intensive care are not mutually exclusive options but rather should be coexistent (12–14). All intensive care patients are at an increased risk of mortality and can benefit from inclusion of the principles of palliative care in their management. The degree to which treatments are focused on cure vs. palliation depends on the clinical situation, but in principle both are always present to some degree. Figure 1 illustrates a useful paradigm for the integration of palliative care and curative care over the course of a patient’s illness. Although many patients are best served by transfer to other environments (e.g., home, hospice, or ward) that may be more conducive to palliative care, some patients are so dependent on ICU technology at the end of life that transfer is not possible. For those who are expected to survive for only a short time after the removal of life-sustaining technology, transfer of the patient to a new environment with new caregivers is awkward and may disrupt the patient’s medical care. For these reasons, among others, intensive care clinicians must become as skilled and knowledgeable at forgoing life-sustaining treatments as they are at delivering care aimed at survival and cure.

We have an enormous problem in the United States with “overtreatment.” The type of overtreatment that gets the most discussion in bioethics journals is the type that is demanded by patients and fam...

We will set the stage for our analysis by reviewing selected medical aspects of anencephaly, outlining the history of the use of anencephalics as organ sources, and summarising the results of an important study recently completed at Loma Linda University. We will then employ some of the arguments and justifications underlying the Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA) to claim that anencephaly is morally equivalent to brain death, i.e., the reasons for considering brain-dead patients to be dead also apply to anencephalics. Finally, we will critique our proposal and discuss its implications.

To describe the attitudes and practice of clinicians in providing sedation and analgesia to dying patients as life-sustaining treatment is withdrawn.Prospective case series of 53 consecutive patients who died after the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the pediatric intensive care unit at three teaching hospitals in Boston. Data on the reasons why medications were given were obtained from a self-administered anonymous questionnaire completed by the critical care physician and nurse for each case. Data on what medications were given were obtained from a review of the medical record.Sedatives and/or analgesics were administered to 47 (89%) patients who died after the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. Patients who were comatose were less likely to receive these medications. Physicians and nurses cited treatment of pain, anxiety, and air hunger as the most common reasons, and hastening death as the least common reason, for administration of these medications. Hastening death was viewed as an "acceptable, unintended side effect" of terminal care by 91% of physician-nurse matched pairs. The mean dose of sedatives and analgesics administered nearly doubled as life-support was withdrawn, and the degree of escalation in dose did not correlate with clinician's views on hastening death.Clinicians frequently escalate the dose of sedatives or analgesics to dying patients as life-sustaining treatment is withdrawn, citing patient-centered reasons as their principle justification. Hastening death is seen as an unintended consequence of appropriate care. A large majority of physicians and nurses agreed with patient management and were satisfied with the care provided. Care of the dying patient after the forgoing of life-sustaining treatment remains underanalyzed and needs more rigorous examination by the critical care community.

Shortly before his death in 1995, Kenneth B. Schwartz, a cancer patient at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), founded The Kenneth B. Schwartz Center at MGH. The Schwartz Center is a nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing compassionate health care delivery, which provides hope to the patient, support to caregivers, and encourages the healing process. The Center sponsors the Schwartz Center Rounds, a monthly multidisciplinary forum where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and their caregivers, and gain insight and support from fellow staff members. The case presented is of a young man dying of recurrent epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, distressed with stridor and severe pain, whose poorly controlled symptoms were successfully treated with an infusion of propofol, titrated to provide effective comfort in the last few hours of the patient's life. The tenet of double effect, which allows aggressive treatment of suffering in spite of foreseeable but unintended consequences, is reviewed. The patient's parents were invited and contributed to the Rounds, providing compelling testimony to the power of the presence of clinicians at the time of death and the importance of open communication about difficult ethical issues.

At the dawn of organ transplantation, the dead donor rule was accepted as an ethical premise that did not require reflection or justification. Dr. Robert Truog and Franklin Miller write that, in retrospect, it appears that reliance on the dead donor rule has greater potential to undermine trust in the transplantation enterprise than to preserve it.