Sinnesael, Matthias, De Vleeschouwer, David, Zeeden, Christian, Batenburg, Sietske J., Da Silva, Anne Christine, de Winter, Niels J., Dinarès-Turell, Jaume, Drury, Anna Joy, Gambacorta, Gabriele, Hilgen, Frederik J., Hinnov, Linda A., Hudson, Alexander J.L., Kemp, David B., Lantink, Margriet L., Laurin, Jiří, Li, Mingsong, Liebrand, Diederik, Ma, Chao, Meyers, Stephen R., Monkenbusch, Johannes, Montanari, Alessandro, Nohl, Theresa, Pälike, Heiko, Pas, Damien, Ruhl, Micha, Thibault, Nicolas, Vahlenkamp, Maximilian, Valero, Luis, Wouters, Sébastien, Wu, Huaichun, Claeys, Philippe, Stratigraphy and paleontology, Paleomagnetism, Stratigraphy & paleontology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Center for Marine Environmental Sciences [Bremen] (MARUM), Universität Bremen, Institut de Mécanique Céleste et de Calcul des Ephémérides (IMCCE), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire de Paris, Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Lille-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Géosciences Rennes (GR), Université de Rennes (UR)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers de Rennes (OSUR), Université de Rennes (UR)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université de Rennes 2 (UR2)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université de Rennes 2 (UR2)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université de Liège, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia - Sezione di Roma (INGV), Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, University of Bremen, Università degli Studi di Milano = University of Milan (UNIMI), Utrecht University [Utrecht], George Mason University [Fairfax], University of Exeter, China University of Geosciences [Wuhan] (CUG), Czech Academy of Sciences [Prague] (CAS), Pennsylvania State University (Penn State), Penn State System, University of Idaho [Moscow, USA], University of Wisconsin-Madison, IT University of Copenhagen (ITU), Osservatorio Geologico di Coldigioco (OGC), Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Trinity College Dublin, Institut de Ciències de la Terra Jaume Almera, China University of Geosciences [Beijing], Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Science and the Arts, Research Foundation – Flanders, Scientific Research, International Association of Sedimentology, Earthrates, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) – Hooverfonds, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers de Rennes (OSUR)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université de Rennes 1 (UR1), Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES), Università degli Studi di Milano [Milano] (UNIMI), IT University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Sciences and Bioengineering Sciences, Chemistry, Analytical, Environmental & Geo-Chemistry, Earth System Sciences, Stratigraphy and paleontology, Paleomagnetism, Stratigraphy & paleontology, Valero Montesa, Luis, and Valero Montesa, Luis [0000-0003-1356-721X]
Cyclostratigraphy is an important tool for understanding astronomical climate forcing and reading geological time in sedimentary sequences, provided that an imprint of insolation variations caused by Earth's orbital eccentricity, obliquity and/or precession is preserved (Milankovitch forcing). Numerous stratigraphic and paleoclimate studies have applied cyclostratigraphy, but the robustness of the methodology and its dependence on the investigator have not been systematically evaluated. We developed the Cyclostratigraphy Intercomparison Project (CIP) to assess the robustness of cyclostratigraphic methods using an experimental design of three artificial cyclostratigraphic case studies with known input parameters. Each case study is designed to address specific challenges that are relevant to cyclostratigraphy. Case 1 represents an offshore research vessel environment, as only a drill-core photo and the approximate position of a late Miocene stage boundary are available for analysis. In Case 2, the Pleistocene proxy record displays clear nonlinear cyclical patterns and the interpretation is complicated by the presence of a hiatus. Case 3 represents a Late Devonian proxy record with a low signal-to-noise ratio with no specific theoretical astronomical solution available for this age. Each case was analyzed by a test group of 17-20 participants, with varying experience levels, methodological preferences and dedicated analysis time. During the CIP 2018 meeting in Brussels, Belgium, the ensuing analyses and discussion demonstrated that most participants did not arrive at a perfect solution, which may be partly explained by the limited amount of time spent on the exercises (∼4.5 hours per case). However, in all three cases, the median solution of all submitted analyses accurately approached the correct result and several participants obtained the exact correct answers. Interestingly, systematically better performances were obtained for cases that represented the data type and stratigraphic age that were closest to the individual participants’ experience. This experiment demonstrates that cyclostratigraphy is a powerful tool for deciphering time in sedimentary successions and, importantly, that it is a trainable skill. Finally, we emphasize the importance of an integrated stratigraphic approach and provide flexible guidelines on what good practices in cyclostratigraphy should include. Our case studies provide valuable insight into current common practices in cyclostratigraphy, their potential merits and pitfalls. Our work does not provide a quantitative measure of reliability and uncertainty of cyclostratigraphy, but rather constitutes a starting point for further discussions on how to move the maturing field of cyclostratigraphy forward. © 2019 The Authors, The Cyclostratigraphy Intercomparison Project (CIP) and Workshop are supported by the Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Science and the Arts (KVAB) , Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO) , Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS) , International Association of Sedimentology (IAS) , Earthrates (National Science Foundation) and the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) – Hooverfonds . Matthias Sinnesael thanks the Research Foundation of Flanders (FWO) for the awarded PhD Fellowship (FWOTM782).