Search

Objective: As metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) becomes more prevalent worldwide, it is imperative to create more accurate technologies that make it easy to assess the liver in a point-of-care setting. The aim of this study is to test the performance of a new software tool implemented in Velacur (Sonic Incytes), a liver stiffness and ultrasound attenuation measurement device, on patients with MASLD. This tool employs a deep learning-based method to detect and segment shear waves in the liver tissue for subsequent analysis to improve tissue characterization for patient diagnosis., Methods: This new tool consists of a deep learning based algorithm, which was trained on 15,045 expert-segmented images from 103 patients, using a U-Net architecture. The algorithm was then tested on 4429 images from 36 volunteers and patients with MASLD. Test subjects were scanned at different clinics with different Velacur operators. Evaluation was performed on both individual images (image based) and averaged across all images collected from a patient (patient based). Ground truth was defined by expert segmentation of the shear waves within each image. For evaluation, sensitivity and specificity for correct wave detection in the image were calculated. For those images containing waves, the Dice coefficient was calculated. A prototype of the software tool was also implemented on Velacur and assessed by operators in real world settings., Results: The wave detection algorithm had a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 84%, with a Dice coefficient of 0.74 and 0.75 for image based and patient-based averages respectively. The implementation of this software tool as an overlay on the B-Mode ultrasound resulted in improved exam quality collected by operators., Conclusion: The shear wave algorithm performed well on a test set of volunteers and patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. The addition of this software tool, implemented on the Velacur system, improved the quality of the liver assessments performed in a real world, point of care setting., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest M.H., J.L., and C.S. are employees of Sonic Incytes. N.W. is a consultant for Sonic Incytes. S.G.: Research grant support for Viking, Zydus, Sonic Incytes, DSM. R.L. Is the Co-founder of LipoNexus Inc. and was an investigator of clinical trials sponsored by Sonic Incytes. R.L. receives funding support from NCATS (5UL1TR001442), NIDDK (U01DK061734, U01DK130190, R01DK106419, R01DK121378, R01DK124318, P30DK120515), NHLBI (P01HL147835), John C Martin Foundation (RP124). A.R.: Advisor /consultant for Abbvie, Gilead, Intercept/ Advanz, Janssen, Novo-Nordisc. He was an investigator of clinical trials sponsored by Sonic Incytes. T.H.: Receives Grant/Research Support from AbbVie, Allergan, Amgen, Biolinq, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cytodyn, Assembly, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CARA, DURECT Corporation, Enanta, Escient, Fractyl, Galectin, Gilead, Grifols, HepQuant, Intercept, Janssen, Merck, Mirum, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Nucorion, Pfizer, Provepharm, Regeneron, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Sonic Incytes, Terns Pharmaceuticals, Valeant. He was an investigator of clinical trials sponsored by Sonic Incytes. E.Y.: Dr. Eric Yoshida is an investigator of clinical research and clinical trials sponsored by: Sonic Incytes Inc, Pfizer Inc, Gilead Inc, Intercept Inc, Madrigal Inc, Novodisc Inc, Genfit Inc. He has also received a research grant from Paladin Laboratories. EP: None. MC has received research support from CareDx, Intercept and Sonic Incytes and consults for International Healthcare and Pfizer. He was an investigator of clinical trials sponsored by Sonic Incytes. N.A. has received consulting fees from Gilead, Glaxo Smith Kline, Jannsen, Sonic Incytes, Precision Biosciences, Intercept Pharmaceuticals. He has stock in Allurion. He is director, Liver Institute for Education and Research. He was an investigator of clinical trials sponsored by Sonic Incytes., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: We evaluated the association of hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatment with all-cause, and liver-related mortality among individuals with HBV and cirrhosis in British Columbia (BC), Canada., Methods: This analysis included people diagnosed with HBV and had cirrhosis in the BC Hepatitis Testers Cohort, including data on all individuals diagnosed with HBV from 1990 to 2015 in BC and integrated with healthcare administrative data. We followed people with cirrhosis from the first cirrhosis diagnosis date until death or December 31, 2020. We compared all-cause and liver related mortality between those who received treatment and those who did not. HBV treatment was considered a time-varying variable. We performed multivariable Cox proportional hazards model and competing risk regression models to assess the association of HBV treatment with all causes, and liver-related mortality respectively using inverse probability of treatment weighted population., Findings: Among 4962 individuals with HBV and cirrhosis, 48.1% received HBV treatment. Treated individuals had a median follow-up of 2.97 years, compared to 2.87 years for untreated individuals. The treated group was older (median age 57 vs 54 years), had higher proportion of treated of males [1802 (75.50%) vs 1766 (68.8%)], from urban area [2318 (97.2%) vs 2355 (91.8%)], and from East and South Asian ethnicity [1506 (63.1%) vs 709 (27.5%)] compared to untreated group. Untreated people experienced higher all-cause mortality (115.47 vs. 35.72 per 1000 person-years) and liver-related mortality (49.86 vs. 11.39 per 1000 person-years). Multivariable models showed that HBV treatment significantly lowered the risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.74; 95% CI: 0.65, 0.84) and liver-related mortality (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (asHR) 0.72; 95% CI: 0.58, 0.89) compared to untreated individuals. Among untreated individuals with HBV, those with HCV coinfection had a higher risk of both all-cause and liver-related mortality (aHR 1.57; 95% CI: 1.22, 2.04, and asHR 1.60; 95% CI: 1.25, 2.05, respectively)., Interpretation: HBV treatment was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause and liver-related mortality among individuals with cirrhosis. The findings highlight the need for treatment among individuals with HBV related cirrhosis especially those with coinfection with hepatitis C virus., Funding: This work was supported by the BC Centre for Disease Control and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [Grant # NHC-142832, PJT-156066, and SC1 -178736]. JDM has received doctoral fellowship from the Canadian Network on Hepatitis C (CanHepC). DJ has received Doctoral Research Award (#201910DF1-435705-64343) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and doctoral fellowship from the CanHepC. CanHepC is funded by a joint initiative of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (NHC-142832) and the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)., Competing Interests: JDM and DJ are supported by the Canadian Network on Hepatitis C (CanHepC) Ph.D. fellowship, DJ is also supported by the CIHR Frederick Banting and Charles Best Doctoral Award. RLM received travel awards from the CIHR and the University of British Columbia but not related the current work. SB received grant/research support from Gilead Sciences and Abbvie. EY has received grant/research support from Paladin Laboratories, Pfizer Inc, Novodisc Inc, Genefit Inc, Intercept Inc, Madrigal Inc, Gilead Sciences, Merck Inc, Sonic Incytes. AR has received greant/research support from Abbvie, Assembly, Galmed, Gilead, Intercept, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo-Nordisc, Pfizer. MK has received grant/research support from Roche, Merck, Siemens, Boehringer Ingelheim and Hologic. NZJ participated in advisory boards and has spoken for AbbVie, not related to current work. MB had no conflict of interest at the time of the study but is now an employee of AstraZeneca. SW, PAA, SB, GC, AY, MA, HS, HAVG, HHK, and YA have no conflicts of interest to declare., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Background: As the prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease increases, it is imperative to have noninvasive alternatives to liver biopsy. Velacur offers a non-invasive, point-of-care ultrasound-based method for the assessment of liver stiffness and attenuation. The aim of this study was to perform a head-to-head comparison of liver stiffness and liver fat determined by Velacur and FibroScan using MRI-based measurements as the reference standard., Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study included 164 adult participants with well-characterized metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Patients underwent a research exam including Velacur, FibroScan and contemporaneous magnetic resonance elastography, and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) scans. The primary outcome was the presence of advanced fibrosis (>F2) as measured by magnetic resonance elastography and the presence of liver fat (>5%) as measured by MRI-PDFF., Results: The mean age and body mass index were 57±12 years and 30.6±4.8 kg/m2, respectively. The mean liver stiffness on magnetic resonance elastography was 3.22±1.39 kPa and the mean liver fat on MRI-PDFF was 14.2±8%. The liver stiffness assessments by Velacur and FibroScan were similar for the detection of advanced fibrosis (AUC 0.95 vs. 0.97) and were not statistically different (p=0.43). Velacur was significantly better than FibroScan (AUC 0.94 vs. 0.79, p=0.01), for the detection of MRI-PDFF >5% (diagnosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated liver disease)., Conclusions: Velacur was superior to FibroScan for liver fat detection with MRI-PDFF as the reference. Velacur and FibroScan were not statistically different for liver stiffness assessment as defined by magnetic resonance elastography., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background & Aims: The investigational first-generation core inhibitor vebicorvir (VBR) demonstrated safety and antiviral activity over 24 weeks in two phase IIa studies in patients with chronic HBV infection. In this long-term extension study, patients received open-label VBR with nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NrtIs)., Methods: Patients in this study (NCT03780543) previously received VBR + NrtI or placebo + NrtI in parent studies 201 (NCT03576066) or 202 (NCT03577171). After receiving VBR + NrtI for ≥52 weeks, stopping criteria (based on the treatment history and hepatitis B e antigen status in the parent studies) were applied, and patients either discontinued both VBR + NrtI, discontinued VBR only, or continued both VBR + NrtI. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with HBV DNA <20 IU/ml at 24 weeks off treatment., Results: Ninety-two patients entered the extension study and received VBR + NrtI. Long-term VBR + NrtI treatment led to continued suppression of HBV nucleic acids and, to a lesser extent, HBV antigens. Forty-three patients met criteria to discontinue VBR + NrtI, with no patients achieving the primary endpoint; the majority of virologic rebound occurred ≥4 weeks off treatment. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with few discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs). There were no deaths. Most AEs and laboratory abnormalities were related to elevations in alanine aminotransferase and occurred during the off-treatment or NrtI-restart phases. No drug-drug interactions between VBR + NrtI and no cases of treatment-emergent resistance among patients who adhered to treatment were observed., Conclusions: Long-term VBR + NrtI was safe and resulted in continued reductions in HBV nucleic acids following completion of the 24-week parent studies. Following treatment discontinuation, virologic relapse was observed in all patients. This first-generation core inhibitor administered with NrtI for at least 52 weeks was not sufficient for HBV cure., Clinical Trial Number: NCT03780543., Impact and Implications: Approved treatments for chronic hepatitis B virus infection (cHBV) suppress viral replication, but viral rebound is almost always observed after treatment discontinuation, highlighting an unmet need for improved therapies with finite treatment duration producing greater therapeutic responses that can be sustained off treatment. First-generation core inhibitors, such as vebicorvir, have mechanisms of action orthogonal to standard-of-care therapies that deeply suppress HBV viral replication during treatment; however, to date, durable virologic responses have not been observed after treatment discontinuation. The results reported here will help researchers with the design and interpretation of future studies investigating core inhibitors as possible components of finite treatment regimens for patients with cHBV. It is possible that next-generation core inhibitors with enhanced potency may produce deeper and more durable antiviral activity than first-generation agents, including vebicorvir., Competing Interests: M-FY reports being an advisor/consultant for AbbVie, AiCuris, Aligos Therapeutics, Antios Therapeutics, Arbutus Biopharma, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Assembly Biosciences, Clear B Therapeutics, Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Finch Therapeutics, Fujirebio Incorporation, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Immunocore, Janssen, Roche, Sysmex Corporation, Tune Therapeutics, Vir Biotechnology, and Visirna Therapeutics and receiving grant/research support from AbbVie, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Assembly Biosciences, Fujirebio Incorporation, Gilead Sciences, Immunocore, Roche, and Sysmex Corporation. SF reports receiving fees for speaking and teaching and/or serving on advisory committees for AbbVie, Assembly Biosciences, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Lupin, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Springbank Pharma. XM reports being a consultant and being on the speakers' bureau for Gilead Sciences. TTN reports receiving research grant support from Assembly Biosciences and Gilead Sciences. TH reports being on the advisory committee, review panel, or consulting for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Merck, and Organovo and receiving research support from AbbVie, Allergan, Assembly Biosciences, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CARA, Cytodyn, DURECT Corporation, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Galectin Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, Grifols, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Merck, Mirum, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Nucorion Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Sonic Incytes, Terns Pharmaceuticals, and Valeant. H-WH reports serving on the National Advisory Board and receives research grant support from Gilead Sciences. ME reports receiving grants from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Gilead Sciences, and Roche and serving on advisory boards for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, and Merck. RGN reports having served on advisory boards and as a speaker for Gilead Sciences, Janssen, and Merck and having conducted research for AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, and Merck. JSP reports receiving research grants from Assembly Biosciences and GlaxoSmithKline and consulting fees from Gilead Sciences. IMJ reports being a consultant or on advisory boards for AbbVie, Aligos Therapeutics, Arbutus Biopharma, Gilead Sciences, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, and Roche; having conducted research (all payments to institution) for Assembly Biosciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cymabay, Eli Lilly, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Janssen, Merck, and Novo Nordisk; receiving payment from the Chronic Liver Disease Foundation for manuscript preparation; and participating on a Data Monitoring Committee for Altimmune, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Galmed, GlaxoSmithKline, and Takeda. WSA reports being a member of the speaking bureau for Gilead Sciences and Intercept Pharmaceuticals and has received research grants from Genfit, GlaxoSmithKline, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Ipsen, Madrigal, Mirum, Pfizer, and Zydus. S-HH reports being a consultant and being on the speakers' bureau for Gilead Sciences. EJG reports serving on advisory boards for AbbVie, Aligos Therapeutics, Assembly Biosciences, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Intellia, Janssen, Roche, Vir Biotechnology, and Virion and having served as a speaker for Abbott Diagnostics, AbbVie, and Gilead Sciences. KZ, RY, and SJK report being employees of and holding stock interest in Assembly Biosciences. JM and LMS report being former employees of and holding stock interest in Assembly Biosciences. MBo reports being a member of the speaking bureau for AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, and Intercept Pharmaceuticals and has received research support from Assembly Biosciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead Sciences, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, and Viking Therapeutics. FW reports being a study investigator for AbbVie. AR reports receiving grant support, lecture fees, and advisory board fees from AbbVie, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Merck, and Novartis. MBe reports having no conflicts of interest. NR reports advising, being on the speakers’ bureau for, and receiving grants from AbbVie and Gilead Sciences; being on the speakers’ bureau for Onyx and Salix; and having received grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck. SC reports receiving clinical trial–related payments from Assembly Biosciences. DTD reports being a consultant for Gilead Sciences and Intercept Pharmaceuticals. PYK reports being an advisor/consultant for AbbVie, Aligos Therapeutics, Antios Therapeutics, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, and Janssen and receives grant/research supports from Altimmune, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Assembly Biosciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eiger Biopharmaceuticals, and Target Registries. ERS reports receiving research and grant support from Assembly Biosciences, Celgene, the University of Florida (TARGET), and Vir Biotechnology and receives royalties from the Schiff Diseases of the Liver, 12th edition. HSB reports having consultancy agreements with and receiving research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead Sciences. JL reports having no conflicts of interest. KA reports being on the advisory board, a consultant, and a speaker for AbbVie, Aligos, Arbutus Biopharma, Assembly Biosciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Immunocore, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Shinogi, Sobi, and Vir Biotechnology and receiving grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, and Roche. MSS reports receiving grants from AbbVie, Assembly Biosciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, the National Institutes of Health, and Vir Biotechnology and receiving personal fees from AbbVie, Antios Therapeutics, Arbutus Biopharma, Atea Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, F2G, Immunocore, Precision Biosciences, and Virion Therapeutics. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: The estimated prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in Canada is approximately 1.0%. However, the number of individuals living with HCV but unaware of it is estimated to be 30%-44%. Increased screening programs that are accessible, effective, and feasible are important to ensure treatment and meet WHO elimination goals. We implemented an HCV point of care test (POCT) program in community pharmacies to examine the effectiveness and feasibility in screening., Methods: Twenty two London Drugs pharmacies in British Columbia and Alberta implemented an HCV POC screening program using OraQuick rapid antibody tests. Consenting patients filled out a 10-question screening questionnaire to examine risk factors. The participants then were tested using the POCT. While waiting for the test (20 minutes), patients were educated on HCV and treatment options., Results: Three hundred seventy-one participants underwent HCV screening. The most common HCV risk factor was being born between 1945 and 1975 (baby boomer) (93% of cohort), while the second most common was having a tattoo or body piercing (22%). Seven people (2%) tested positive; four were HCV-RNA PCR-positive and were treated, whereas the PCR status of three was unknown as they were lost to follow-up or not tested., Conclusions: Pharmacy-based POCT was shown to be effective and feasible in the western Canadian context, especially for baby boomers. Sustainable funding for pharmacy screening programs may be considered nationwide to identify HCV-infected persons and help meet elimination goals., (© Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver, 2023.)

Background: Individuals infected with hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV), and human immunodeficiency (HIV) viruses can experience compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) leading to esophageal varices (EV). In patients at low risk of esophageal varices needing treatment (EVNT), non-invasive criteria based on liver stiffness measurement (LSM) with platelets, or fibrosis biomarkers, may avoid unnecessary screening esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGD). These approaches have not been compared among people infected with HIV, HBV, and HCV patients., Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of cACLD (LSM ≥10 kPa) and EGD availability were included from two cohorts. Baveno VI and expanded Baveno VI criteria (based on LSM and platelets), fibrosis biomarkers Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4), AST-to-Platelets Ratio Index (APRI), AST-to-ALT ratio (AAR), and RESIST criteria (based on platelets and albumin) were applied to determine the proportion of spared EGD and of missed EVNT., Results: Three hundred fifty three patients (30.6% with HIV, 25.3% monoinfected with HBV, and 44.1% with HCV) were included. The prevalence of EVNT was 8.2%. Both Baveno VI and expanded Baveno VI criteria performed well in patients with virus-related cACLD, by sparing 26.1% and 51.6% EGD, respectively, while missing <2% EVNT. The proportion of spared EGD were 48.2%, 58%, and 24.3% by FIB-4 (<2.78), APRI (<1.1), and AAR (<0.75), respectively, while missing <3% EVNT. RESIST criteria spared 47.8% EGD while missing 1.9% EVNT., Conclusions: Non-invasive criteria based on LSM can spare unnecessary EGD in virus-related cACLD. Simple fibrosis biomarkers can ameliorate resource utilization for EVNT screening in low resource settings., (© Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver, 2023.)

Hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection occurs as a coinfection with hepatitis B and increases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, decompensated cirrhosis, and mortality compared to hepatitis B virus (HBV) monoinfection. Reliable estimates of the prevalence of HDV infection and disease burden are essential to formulate strategies to find coinfected individuals more effectively and efficiently. The global prevalence of HBV infections was estimated to be 262,240,000 in 2021. Only 1,994,000 of the HBV infections were newly diagnosed in 2021, with more than half of the new diagnoses made in China. Our initial estimates indicated a much lower prevalence of HDV antibody (anti-HDV) and HDV RNA positivity than previously reported in published studies. Accurate estimates of HDV prevalence are needed. The most effective method to generate estimates of the prevalence of anti-HDV and HDV RNA positivity and to find undiagnosed individuals at the national level is to implement double reflex testing. This requires anti-HDV testing of all hepatitis B surface antigen-positive individuals and HDV RNA testing of all anti-HDV-positive individuals. This strategy is manageable for healthcare systems since the number of newly diagnosed HBV cases is low. At the global level, a comprehensive HDV screening strategy would require only 1,994,000 HDV antibody tests and less than 89,000 HDV PCR tests. Double reflex testing is the preferred strategy in countries with a low prevalence of HBV and those with a high prevalence of both HBV and HDV. For example, in the European Union and North America only 35,000 and 22,000 cases, respectively, will require anti-HDV testing annually., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background/aims: Novel agents acting against hepatitis B virus (HBV) are needed to improve HBsAg seroclearance or termed as 'functional cure'. Inarigivir (retinoic acid-inducible gene I agonist) has immunomodulatory and direct antiviral actions against HBV. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of Inarigivir for the treatment of HBV infection., Patients/methods: 80 treatment-naïve patients were randomized in 4 ascending dose cohorts to receive 12 weeks of Inarigivir 25, 50, 100, 200 mg or placebo in a ratio of 4:1. All patients were then given tenofovir for another 12 weeks., Results: Least squares (LS) mean reductions in HBV DNA from baseline increased with higher doses of Inarigivir (0.6116 in 25 mg and 1.5774 in 200 mg groups vs. 0.0352 in placebo group) (95% CI 0.9518-0.2011 and 1.921-1.1634 respectively). LS mean changes in HBV RNA and HBsAg from baseline ranged from -0.3856 to -0.5794 versus -0.1474 and -0.0956 to -0.1818 versus +0.0026 in Inarigivir-treated versus placebo groups respectively. During the tenofovir-treated period, LS mean reductions in HBsAg in the Inarigivir-treated groups ranged from 0.1709 to 0.3529 versus 0.1984 in the placebo group. Inarigivir-treated groups showed mean reductions in ALT from baseline between 23.3 and 33.8 versus 0.7 U/L in the placebo group. Treatment-emergent adverse events related to Inarigivir and placebo occurred in 4.7% and 6.3% patients respectively., Conclusions: Twelve-week Inarigivir up to 200 mg dose was associated with a reduction of HBV DNA, HBV RNA and antigen levels. A trend for greater HBsAg reduction was observed in Inarigivir pre-treated patients after switching to tenofovir., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) achieves increased renal safety and improved alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization but increased lipid profile in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-monoinfected patients switched from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). It is unclear whether HIV coinfection perturbs these biochemical changes. To this end, we assessed these parameters in HIV/HBV-coinfected patients switched from TDF to TAF., Design: Retrospective, multicenter, observational study., Methods: HIV/HBV-coinfected patients switched from TDF to TAF-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) at 6 Canadian Hepatitis B Network (CanHepB) academic sites were included. Changes in lipid profile, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and ALT were evaluated using linear mixed effect model regression., Results: Eighty-two HIV/HBV-coinfected patients with a mean 103-week follow-up duration were identified. At time of TAF switch, 80 of 82 (98%) were HBV virally suppressed, 29 of 82 (35%) had elevated ALT levels, and 63 of 82 (77%) had eGFR of ≥60 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 . Twenty-six/Eighty-two (32%) had preexisting renal comorbidities. There were no changes in total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, and triglyceride levels 2 years after TAF switch. Those with elevated ALT levels achieved greater ALT normalization after TAF switch (-0.004 [-0.008 to 0.0] log 10 U/L/mo, P = 0.03). eGFR decline rate while on TDF (-0.66 [-0.23 to -1.08] mL/min/month, P &lt; 0.005) was diminished after switching to TAF (-0.02 [-0.16 to 0.11] mL/min/mo, P = 0.7) and those with eGFR of &lt;60 mL/min experienced increase in eGFR after TAF switch (0.45 [0.03-0.87] mL/min/mo, P = 0.04)., Conclusions: Our study supports switching from TDF to TAF with positive influence on overall long-term biochemical profile in HIV/HBV-coinfected individuals., Competing Interests: A.W. has received grants and honoraria from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, and Merck. S.F. consults for Gilead, Abbvie, Assembly, Springbank, and Eisai. K.D. reports a grant from Gilead Sciences. A.R. consults for Abbvie, Gilead, Janssen, Intercept, and Merck. B.C. reports grants and honoraria from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Indivior, Merck, and Viiv Healthcare. C.S.C. reports investigator-initiated research grants/research materials from GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Arbutus Biopharma, and Bristol Myers Squibb and educational grants from Merck, Gilead Sciences, and Janssen Pharmaceutica. B.E.H. consults for and/or received grants from Intercept, Cymabay, Janssen, and Albirco. H.L.A.J. received grants from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Innogenetics, Janssen, Medimmune, Medtronic, and Merck, Roche and is consultant for AbbVie, Benitec, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Medimmune, Merck, Roche, and Arbutus. All authors have no potential personal, in addition to, financial conflict of interest related to this study. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss is associated with improved clinical outcomes for individuals with chronic hepatitis B (CHB); however, the effects of varying HBsAg levels on clinical outcomes in diverse cohorts are understudied., Methods: In this cross-sectional, multicentre, retrospective study, the data on adult subjects enrolled in the Canadian HBV Network with CHB seen from 1 January 2012 to 30 January 2021 with the treatment and virologic data within 1 year of HBsAg testing were analyzed. Patients were tested for HBsAg using qualitative (for HBsAg-negative samples) and/or commercial quantitative assays. Fibrosis or hepatic necroinflammation was determined by the liver stiffness measurement (LSM). The baseline data were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared by using univariable/multivariable analyses., Results: This study included 844 CHB patients, with a median age of 49.6 years (IQR 40.1-60.5), and 37% were female. In total, 751 patients (78.6%) had known ethnicity data, and 76.7% self-reported as Asian, 11.4% as Black, 6.8% as White, and 4.8% as other. Among the 844 patients, 237 (28.0%) were HBsAg (-) (1000 IU/mL. Overall, 80% (682) had known HBeAg status at the last follow-up, and the majority (87.0%) were HBeAg-negative. In addition, 54% (461/844) had prior antiviral therapy, 19.7% of which (16.3, 23.7, n = 91) were HBsAg (-). The treated patients had a lower risk of cirrhosis (16.46, 95% CI 1.89-143.39, p = 0.01) or HCC (8.23, 95% CI 1.01-67.39, p = 0.05) than the untreated patients. A lower proportion of the HBsAg-loss group had cirrhosis (5.7% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.021) and HCC (0.9% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.001)., Conclusion: In this retrospective, ethnically diverse cohort study, CHB patients who received antiviral therapy and/or had HBsAg loss were less likely to develop cirrhosis and HCC, confirming the results of the studies in less diverse cohorts. No association was found between the qHBsAg level and fibrosis determined with LSM. Individuals who achieved HBsAg loss had low-level qHBsAg within 1 year of seroclearance.

Data on the contribution of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and related comorbidities to liver-related mortality in Canada are limited. We assessed the concurrent impact of HBV infection, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection on liver-related deaths in British Columbia (BC), Canada. We used data from the BC Hepatitis Testers Cohort (BC-HTC). We used Fine-Gray multivariable sub-distributional hazards models to assess the effect of HBV, NAFLD, and HCV coinfection on liver-related mortality, while adjusting for confounders and competing mortality risks. The liver-related mortality rate was higher among people with HBV infection than those without (2.57 per 1000 PYs (95%CI: 2.46, 2.69) vs. 0.62 per 1000 PYs (95%CI: 0.61, 0.64), respectively). Compared with the HBV negative groups, HBV infection was associated with increased liver-related mortality risk in almost all of the subgroups: HBV mono-infection (adjusted subdistribution hazards ratio (asHR) of 3.35, 95% CI 3.16, 3.55), NAFLD with HBV infection, (asHR 12.5, 95% CI 7.08, 22.07), and HBV/HCV coinfection (asHR 8.4, 95% CI 7.62, 9.26). HBV infection is associated with a higher risk of liver-related mortality, and has a greater relative impact on people with NAFLD and those with HCV coinfection. The diagnosis and treatment of viral and fatty liver disease are required to mitigate liver-related morbidity and mortality.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is prevalent in people with mental health disorders, a priority population to diagnose and cure in order to achieve HCV elimination. This integrated analysis pooled data from 20 cohorts in seven countries to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of the pangenotypic direct-acting antiviral (DAA) sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) in people with mental health disorders. HCV-infected patients diagnosed with mental health disorders who were treated with SOF/VEL for 12 weeks without ribavirin as part of routine clinical practice were included. The primary outcome was sustained virological response (SVR) in the effectiveness population (EP), defined as patients with an available SVR assessment. Secondary outcomes were reasons for not achieving SVR, characteristics of patients with non-virological failures, adherence, and time from HCV RNA diagnosis to SOF/VEL treatment initiation. A total of 1209 patients were included; 142 did not achieve an SVR for non-virological reasons ( n = 112; 83 lost to follow-up, 20 early treatment discontinuations) or unknown reasons ( n = 30). Of the 1067 patients in the EP, 97.4% achieved SVR. SVR rates in the EP were ≥95% when stratified by type of mental health disorder and other complicating baseline characteristics, including active injection drug use and antipsychotic drug use. Of 461 patients with data available in the EP, only 2% had an adherence level < 90% and 1% had an adherence level < 80%; all achieved SVR. Patients with mental health disorders can be cured of HCV using a well-tolerated, pangenotypic, protease inhibitor-free SOF/VEL regimen. This DAA allows the implementation of a simple treatment algorithm, with minimal monitoring requirements and fewer interactions with central nervous system drugs compared with protease-inhibitor DAA regimens.

Background & Aims: Nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors do not completely suppress HBV DNA in chronic HBV infection (cHBV). Vebicorvir (VBR) is an investigational core inhibitor that interferes with multiple aspects of HBV replication. This phase II trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of VBR in combination with entecavir (ETV) in treatment-naïve patients with cHBV., Methods: HBeAg-positive, treatment-naïve patients without cirrhosis were randomised 1:1 in a double-blind manner to once-daily VBR 300 mg+ETV 0.5 mg or placebo (PBO)+ETV 0.5 mg for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in mean log 10 HBV DNA from Baseline to Week 12 and 24., Results: All patients in both treatment groups (PBO+ETV: 12/12; VBR+ETV: 13/13) completed the study. At Week 12, VBR+ETV led to a greater mean (SD) reduction from Baseline in log 10 IU/ml HBV DNA (-4.45 [1.03]) vs. PBO+ETV (-3.30 [1.18]; p = 0.0077). At Week 24, VBR+ETV led to a greater reduction from Baseline in log 10 IU/ml HBV DNA (-5.33 [1.59]) vs. PBO+ETV (-4.20 [0.98]; p = 0.0084). Greater mean reductions in pregenomic RNA were observed at Week 12 and 24 in patients receiving VBR+ETV vs. PBO+ETV (p <0.0001 and p <0.0001). Changes in viral antigens were similar in both groups. No drug interaction between VBR and ETV was observed. Two patients experienced HBV DNA rebound during treatment, with no resistance breakthrough detected. The safety of VBR+ETV was similar to PBO+ETV. All treatment-emergent adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were Grade 1/2. There were no deaths, serious adverse events, or evidence of drug-induced liver injury., Conclusions: In this 24-week study, VBR+ETV provided additive antiviral activity over PBO+ETV in treatment-naïve patients with cHBV, with a favourable safety and tolerability profile., Clinical Trial Number: NCT03577171 LAY SUMMARY: Hepatitis B is a long-lasting viral infection of the liver. Current treatments can suppress hepatitis B virus but do not offer the opportunity of cure, hence, new treatment approaches are required. Herein, we show that the combination of the novel core inhibitor vebicorvir with an existing antiviral (entecavir) in treatment-naïve patients chronically infected with hepatitis B virus demonstrated greater antiviral activity than entecavir alone. Additionally, vebicorvir was safe and well tolerated. Thus, further studies evaluating its potential role in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B are warranted., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Mark S. Sulkowski reports receiving grants from AbbVie, Assembly Biosciences, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, and the National Institutes of Health; and receiving personal fees from AbbVie, Antios Therapeutics, Arbutus Biopharma, Atea Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, FH360, and Immunocore. Kosh Agarwal reports being on the advisory board, a consultant, and a speaker for AbbVie, Assembly Biosciences, Aligos, Arbutus, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Immunocore, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sobi, Shinoigi, and Vir; and receiving grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, and Roche. Xiaoli Ma reports being a consultant and being on the speakers bureau for Gilead Sciences. Tuan T. Nguyen reports receiving research grant support from Gilead Sciences and Assembly Biosciences. Eugene R. Schiff reports receiving research and grant support from Assembly Biosciences, Celgene, and the University of Florida (TARGET) and receives royalties from the Schiff Diseases of the Liver, 12th edition. Hie-Won L. Hann reports serving on the National Advisory Board and receives research grant support from Gilead Sciences. Douglas T. Dieterich reports being a consultant for Gilead Sciences and Intercept Pharmaceuticals. Ronald G. Nahass reports having served on advisory boards and as a speaker for Gilead Sciences, Merck, and Janssen; and having conducted research for Gilead Sciences, Merck, Janssen, and AbbVie. James S. Park reports receiving research grants from Assembly Biosciences and GlaxoSmithKline and consulting fees from Gilead Sciences. Sing Chan reports receiving clinical trial–related payments from Assembly Biosciences. Steven-Huy Han reports being a consultant and being on the speakers bureau for Gilead Sciences. Edward J. Gane reports serving on advisory boards for AbbVie, Aligos Therapeutics, Arbutus Biopharma, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Assembly Biosciences, Avilia Therapeutics, Clear B Therapeutics, Dicerna, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Finch Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Immunocore, Janssen, Roche, Silverback, and Vir Bio; and having served as a speaker for Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, and Roche. Michael Bennett reports having no conflicts of interest. Katia Alves reports being a former employee of and holding stock interest in Assembly Biosciences. Marc Evanchik reports having been an employee of and holding stock interest in Assembly Biosciences and is currently an employee of Edgewise Therapeutics. Ran Yan reports being an employee of and holding stock interest in Assembly Biosciences. Qi Huang reports being an employee of and holding stock interest in Assembly Biosciences. Uri Lopatin reports being a former employee and holding stock interest in Assembly Biosciences. Richard Colonno reports being an employee of and holding stock interest in Assembly Biosciences. Julie Ma reports being an employee of and holding stock interest in Assembly Biosciences. Steven J. Knox reports being an employee of and holding stock interest in Assembly Biosciences. Luisa M. Stamm reports being an employee of and holding stock interest in Assembly Biosciences. Maurizio Bonacini reports being a member of the speaking bureau for Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, and AbbVie and has received research support from Assembly Biosciences, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Viking Therapeutics, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Ira M. Jacobson reports being a consultant or on advisory boards for AbbVie, Aligos Therapeutics, Arbutus Biopharma, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Madrigal and Virion; having conducted research (all payments to institution) for Assembly Biosciences, Bristol-Myers Squib, Eli Lilly, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck, and Novo Nordisk; receiving payment from the Chronic Liver Disease Foundation for manuscript preparation; and reports participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for GSK, Redhill, Galmed, NeuroBo, and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals. Walid S. Ayoub reports being a member of the speaking bureau for both Gilead Sciences and Intercept Pharmaceuticals and has conducted research for Assembly Biosciences, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, and Gilead Sciences. Frank Weilert reports being a study investigator for AbbVie. Natarajan Ravendhran reports advising, being on the speakers’ bureau for, and receiving grants from Gilead Sciences and AbbVie; being on the speakers' bureau for Salix and Onyx; and having received grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck. Alnoor Ramji reports receiving grant support, lecture fees, and advisory board fees from AbbVie, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Merck. Paul Yien Kwo reports being an advisor/consultant for AbbVie, Aligos Therapeutics, Antios Therapeutics, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, and receives grant/research supports from Assembly Biosciences, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Eiger Biopharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Altimmune, and Target Registries. Magdy Elkhashab reports receiving grants from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Gilead Sciences, and Roche; and serving on advisory boards for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, and Merck. Tarek Hassanein reports being on the advisory committee, review panel, or consulting for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Merck, and Organovo and receiving research support from AbbVie, Allergan, Cytodyn, Assembly Biosciences, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CARA, DURECT Corporation, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Galectin Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, Grifols, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Merck, Mirum, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Nucorion Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Sonic Incytes, Terns Pharmaceuticals, and Valeant. Ho S. Bae reports having consultancy agreements with and receiving research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead Sciences. Jacob P. Lalezari reports having no conflicts of interest. Scott K. Fung reports receiving fees for speaking and teaching and/or serving on advisory committees for AbbVie, Assembly Biosciences, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, and Springbank Pharma. Man-Fung Yuen reports being an advisor/consultant for and/or having received grant/research support from AbbVie, Aligos Therapeutics, Antios Therapeutics, Arbutus Biopharma, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Assembly Biosciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clear B Therapeutics, Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Finch Therapeutics, Fujirebio Incorporation, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Immunocore, Janssen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Roche, Springbank Pharmaceuticals, Silverback Therapeutics, Sysmex Corporation and Vir Biotechnology. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an established risk factor for liver cancer. Although several epidemiologic studies have evaluated the risk of extrahepatic malignancies among people living with HCV, due to various study limitations, results have been heterogeneous., Methods: We used data from the British Columbia Hepatitis Testers Cohort (BC-HTC), which includes all individuals tested for HCV in the Province since 1990. We assessed hepatic and extrahepatic cancer incidence using data from BC Cancer Registry. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) comparing to the general population of BC were calculated for each cancer site from 1990 to 2016., Results: In total, 56,823 and 1,207,357 individuals tested positive and negative for HCV, respectively. Median age at cancer diagnosis among people with and without HCV infection was 59 (interquartile range (IQR): 53-65) and 63 years (IQR: 54-74), respectively. As compared to people living without HCV, a greater proportion of people living with HCV-infection were men (66.7% vs. 44.7%, P-value <0.0001), had comorbidities (25.0% vs. 16.3%, P-value <0.0001) and were socially deprived (35.9% vs. 25.0%, P-value <0.0001). The SIRs for liver (SIR 33.09; 95% CI 29.80-36.39), anal (SIR: 2.57; 95% CI 1.52-3.63), oesophagus (SIR: 2.00; 95% CI 1.17-2.82), larynx (SIR: 3.24; 95% CI 1.21-5.27), lung (SIR: 2.20; 95% CI 1.82-2.58), and oral (SIR: 1.78; 95% CI 1.33-2.23) cancers were significantly higher among individuals living with HCV. The SIRs for bile duct and pancreatic cancers were significantly elevated among both individuals living with (SIR; 95% CI: 2.20; 1.27-3.14; 2.18; 1.57-2.79, respectively) and without HCV (SIR; 95% CI: 2.12; 1.88-2.36; 1.20; 1.11-1.28, respectively)., Discussion/conclusion: In this study, HCV infection was associated with increased incidence of several extrahepatic cancers. The elevated incidence of multiple cancers among negative HCV testers highlights the potential contributions of screening bias and increased cancer risks associated with factors driving acquisition of infection among this population compared to the general population. Early HCV diagnosis and treatment as well as public health prevention strategies are needed to reduce the risk of extrahepatic cancers among people living with HCV and potentially populations who are at higher risk of HCV infection., Competing Interests: Author MeK received grants from Roche Molecular Systems, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Darvishian, Tang, Wong, Binka, Yu, Alvarez, Alexander Velásquez García, Adu, Jeong, Bartlett, Karamouzian, Damascene Makuza, Wong, Ramji, Woods, Krajden, Janjua and Bhatti.)

Background & Aims: HBV nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NrtIs) do not completely suppress HBV replication. Previous reports indicate persistent viremia during NrtI treatment despite HBV DNA being undetectable. HBV core inhibitors may enhance viral suppression when combined with NrtIs. This phase II trial (NCT03576066) evaluated the efficacy and safety of the investigational core inhibitor, vebicorvir (VBR), in virologically- suppressed patients on NrtIs., Methods: Non-cirrhotic, NrtI-suppressed patients with chronic HBV were randomised to VBR 300 mg once daily or matching placebo (PBO) for 24 weeks. Treatment was stratified by hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status. The primary endpoint was change from Baseline in serum HBeAg or hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) after 24 weeks., Results: Of 73 patients enrolled, 47 were HBeAg positive and 26 were HBeAg negative. In HBeAg-positive and -negative patients, there were no differences in the change from Baseline at Week 24 for HBsAg or HBeAg. Using a novel, high-sensitivity assay to detect HBV DNA, a greater proportion of patients with detectable HBV DNA at Baseline achieved undetectable HBV DNA at Week 24 in the VBR+NrtI vs. PBO+NrtI group. In HBeAg-positive patients, a greater change from Baseline in HBV pregenomic (pg)RNA was observed at Week 24 with VBR+NrtI vs. PBO+NrtI. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in VBR+NrtI patients included upper respiratory tract infection, nausea, and pruritus. No serious adverse events, Grade 4 TEAEs, or deaths were reported., Conclusions: In this 24-week study, VBR+NrtI demonstrated a favourable safety and tolerability profile. While there were no significant changes in viral antigen levels, enhanced viral suppression was demonstrated by greater changes in DNA and pgRNA with the addition of VBR compared to NrtI alone., Clinical Trials Number: NCT03576066., Lay Summary: Core inhibitors represent a novel approach for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, with mechanisms of action distinct from existing treatments. In this study, vebicorvir added to existing therapy reduced HBV replication to a greater extent than existing treatment and was generally safe and well tolerated., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Man-Fung Yuen reports being an advisor/consultant for and/or having received grant/research support from AbbVie, Aligos Therapeutics, Antios Therapeutics, Arbutus Biopharma, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Assembly Biosciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clear B Therapeutics, Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Finch Therapeutics, Fujirebio Incorporation, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Immunocore, Janssen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Roche, Springbank Pharmaceuticals, Silverback Therapeutics, Sysmex Corporation, and Vir Biotechnology. Kosh Agarwal reports being on the advisory board, a consultant, and a speaker for AbbVie, Assembly Biosciences, Aligos, Arbutus, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Immunocore, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sobi, Shinoigi, and Vir; and receiving grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, and Roche. Xiaoli Ma reports being a consultant and being on the speakers bureau for Gilead Sciences. Tuan T. Nguyen reports receiving research grant support from Gilead Sciences and Assembly Biosciences. Eugene R. Schiff reports receiving research and grant support from Assembly Biosciences, Celgene, and the University of Florida (TARGET) and receives royalties from the Schiff Diseases of the Liver, 12th edition. Hie-Won L. Hann reports serving on the National Advisory Board and receives research grant support from Gilead Sciences. Douglas T. Dieterich reports being a consultant for Gilead Sciences and Intercept Pharmaceuticals. Ronald G. Nahass reports having served on advisory boards and as a speaker for Gilead Sciences, Merck, and Janssen; and having conducted research for Gilead Sciences, Merck, Janssen, and AbbVie. James S. Park reports receiving research grants from Assembly Biosciences and GlaxoSmithKline and consulting fees from Gilead Sciences. Sing Chan reports receiving clinical trial-related payments from Assembly Biosciences. Steven-Huy Han reports being a consultant and being on the speakers bureau for Gilead Sciences. Edward J. Gane reports serving on advisory boards for AbbVie, Aligos Therapeutics, Arbutus Biopharma, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Assembly Biosciences, Avilia Therapeutics, Clear B Therapeutics, Dicerna, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Finch Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Immunocore, Janssen, Roche, Silverback, and Vir Bio. and having served as a speaker for Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, and Roche. Michael Bennett reports having no conflicts of interest. Katia Alves reports being a former employee of and holding stock interest in Assembly Biosciences. Marc Evanchik reports having been an employee of and holding stock interest in Assembly Biosciences and is currently an employee of Edgewise Therapeutics. Ran Yan reports being an employee of and holding stock interest in Assembly Biosciences. Qi Huang reports being an employee of and holding stock interest in Assembly Biosciences. Uri Lopatin reports being a former employee and holding stock interest in Assembly Biosciences. Richard Colonno reports being an employee of and holding stock interest in Assembly Biosciences. Julie Ma reports being an employee of and holding stock interest in Assembly Biosciences. Steven J. Knox reports being an employee of and holding stock interest in Assembly Biosciences. Luisa M. Stamm reports being an employee of and holding stock interest in Assembly Biosciences. Maurizio Bonacini reports being a member of the speaking bureau for Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, and AbbVie and has received research support from Assembly Biosciences, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Viking Therapeutics, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Ira M. Jacobson reports being a consultant or on advisory boards for AbbVie, Aligos Therapeutics, Arbutus Biopharma, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Madrigal and Virion; having conducted research (all payments to institution) for Assembly Biosciences, Bristol-Myers Squib, Eli Lilly, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck, and Novo Nordisk; receiving payment from the Chronic Liver Disease Foundation for manuscript preparation; and reports participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for GSK, Redhill, Galmed, NeuroBo, and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals. Walid S. Ayoub reports being a member of the speaking bureau for both Gilead Sciences and Intercept Pharmaceuticals and has conducted research for Assembly Biosciences, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, and Gilead Sciences. Frank Weilert reports being a study investigator for AbbVie. Natarajan Ravendhran reports advising, being on the speakers’ bureau for, and receiving grants from Gilead Sciences and AbbVie; being on the speakers' bureau for Salix and Onyx; and having received grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck. Alnoor Ramji reports receiving grant support, lecture fees, and advisory board fees from AbbVie, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Merck. Paul Yien Kwo reports being an advisor/consultant for AbbVie, Aligos Therapeutics, Antios Therapeutics, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, and receives grant/research support from Assembly Biosciences, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Eiger Biopharmaceuticals, Bristol Myer Squibb, Altimmune, and Target Registries. Magdy Elkhashab reports receiving grants from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Gilead Sciences, and Roche; and serving on advisory boards for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, and Merck. Tarek Hassanein reports being on the advisory committee, review panel, or consulting for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Merck, and Organovo and receiving research support from AbbVie, Allergan, Cytodyn, Assembly Biosciences, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CARA, DURECT Corporation, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Galectin Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, Grifols, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Merck, Mirum, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Nucorion Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Sonic Incytes, Terns Pharmaceuticals, and Valeant. Ho S. Bae reports having consultancy agreements with and receiving research support from Bristol-Myers-Squibb and Gilead Sciences. Jacob P. Lalezari reports having no conflicts of interest. Scott K. Fung reports receiving fees for speaking & teaching and/or serving on advisory committees for AbbVie, Assembly Biosciences, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, and Springbank Pharma. Mark S. Sulkowski reports receiving grants from AbbVie, Assembly Biosciences, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, and the National Institutes of Health; and receiving personal fees from AbbVie, Antios Therapeutics, Arbutus Biopharma, Atea Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, FH360, and Immunocore. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) therapy reduces liver disease but requires prolonged therapy to achieve hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss. There is limited North American real-world data using non-invasive tools for fibrosis assessment and few have compared 1 st generation NA or lamivudine (LAM) to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)., Aim: To assess impact of NA on virological response and fibrosis regression using liver stiffness measurement (LSM) ( i.e. , FibroScan ® )., Methods: Retrospective, observational cohort study from the Canadian HBV Network. Data collected included demographics, NA, HBV DNA, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and LSM. Patients were HBV monoinfected patients, treatment naïve, and received 1 NA with minimum 1 year follow-up., Results: In 465 (median 49 years, 37% female, 35% hepatitis B e antigen + at baseline, 84% Asian, 6% White, and 9% Black). Percentage of 64 ( n = 299) received TDF and 166 were LAM-treated with similar median duration of 3.9 and 3.7 years, respectively. The mean baseline LSM was 11.2 kPa (TDF) vs 8.3 kPa (LAM) ( P = 0.003). At 5-year follow-up, the mean LSM was 7.0 kPa in TDF vs 6.7 kPa in LAM ( P = 0.83). There was a significant difference in fibrosis regression between groups ( i.e. , mean -4.2 kPa change in TDF and -1.6 kPa in LAM, P < 0.05). The last available data on treatment showed that all had normal ALT, but more TDF patients were virologically suppressed (< 10 IU/mL) ( n = 170/190, 89%) vs LAM-treated ( n = 35/58, 60%) ( P < 0.05). None cleared HBsAg., Conclusion: In this real-world North American study, approximately 5 years of NA achieves liver fibrosis regression rarely leads to HBsAg loss., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: Dr. Alnoor Ramji and Dr. Carla S Coffin didn’t receive at any time payment from a third party for any aspect for the submitted work; there are no relevant conflict of interest; there are no patents related to this work; Dr. Alnoor Ramji and Dr. Carla S Coffin have nothing to disclosure., (©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a rare, chronic autoimmune, cholestatic liver disease affecting approximately 318 per million Canadians. There is limited information regarding the characterization of this patient population in Canada. Consequently, we aim to describe a cohort of PBC patients managed across liver centres serving this type of population., Methods: A cross-sectional examination of 1,125 PBC patient charts at 15 liver centres across Canada was conducted between January 2016 and September 2017., Results: Data from 1,125 eligible patients were collected from 7 Canadian provinces. The patient population was largely female (90.2%), had a median overall age of 61.3 years, and a median overall time since diagnosis of 6.4 years. Of the patients included in the study, 89% were on ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy at a median dose of 14.0 mg/kg/day and 4.4% were previously treated with UDCA, whereas 6.6% were never treated with UDCA. Of the patients with available data (n = 1067), 289 (27.1%) presented with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels ≥200 IU/L and/or total bilirubin levels ≥21 µmol/L. Assessment of UDCA treatment response revealed that 26.6% and 38.3% of patients were inadequate responders according to the Toronto and Paris-II criteria, respectively. Mortality occurred in 1.2% (14) of patients, with liver-related adverse outcomes being more commonly observed in patients who discontinued UDCA compared to those who are currently on treatment (36.3% and 19.6%, respectively)., Conclusion: This study showed that Canadian PBC patients present with demographics and features commonly reported in the literature for this disease. Over one third of PBC patients had inadequate response to UDCA treatment or were not currently being treated with UDCA. Consequently, there is a significant unmet therapeutic need in this Canadian PBC population., Competing Interests: EM Yoshida has received an unrestricted research grant from Paladin Laboartories and clinical trials sponsorship from Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Abbvie, Merck, Genfit, Pfizer, Celgene, Allergan, and Madrigal. He has also received honoraria for CME/Ad Board lectures from Intercept, Gilead, and Merck. He is President of the Vancouver Medical Dental Allied Staff Association; C Tsien received grants/contracts from Lupin, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, or educational events from Abbvie and Intercept; MG Swain received grants/contracts for research studies from Gilead, Intercept, CymaBay, Genkyotex, GSK, Genfit, Novartis, Pfizer, Celgene, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, and Novo Nordisk, payment or honoraria for lectures and presentations from Gilead, Intercept, and AbbVie, and participated on the advisory boards for Gilead, Novartis, and Intercept; KM Peltekian participated on the advisory board for Intercept and has held a leadership or fiduciary role on the Canadian Liver Foundation board; MA Puglia has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Intercept as well as support from them for attending meetings and/or travel and participating on their advisory board; M Elkhashab has received consulting fees and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, Gilead, and Merck, as well as participated on the advisory boards for AbbVie, Gilead, and Merck; M O’Brien has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, or educational events from Intercept; HH Ko has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, or educational events from Intercept and has held a leadership or fiduciary role on the Intercept advisory board; E Tam has received consulting fees from Intercept as well as payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Intercept; A Ramji has received grants/contracts from AbbVie, Allergan, Assembly, Galmed, Gilead, Janssen, Intercept, Novartis, and Merck, as well as payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, Allergan, Amgen, Celgene, Gilead, Intercept, Amgen, Janssen, Novartis, and Merck. He has participated on advisory board for AbbVie, Gilead, Janssen, Intercept, Novartis, Merck, and Novo Nordisk; the other authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver.)

Introduction: In clinical trials with hepatitis C virus-infected treatment-naïve (TN) patients with compensated cirrhosis (CC), glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P), a fixed-dose, once-daily, pangenotypic regimen, has demonstrated sustained virologic response at posttreatment Week 12 (SVR12) > 95%. We evaluated the real-world safety and effectiveness of 8-week G/P therapy in TN patients with CC, including certain subgroups of interest., Methods: The CREST study is a real-world, noninterventional, multicenter study retrospectively assessing data from Canada, Germany, Israel, Italy, and Spain. The full analysis set (FAS) designated all patients in the study; the modified analysis set (MAS) excluded patients who discontinued G/P for nonvirologic failure or who had missing SVR12 data. The primary endpoint was SVR12; safety endpoints were also assessed., Results: A total of 386 patients were included in the FAS, 375 patients completed the study, and 325 patients were included in the MAS; 51 patients had missing SVR12 data. Overall, in the MAS and FAS, SVR12 was achieved in 99.1% and 84.2% of patients, respectively. In subgroups of interest, the percentage of patients achieving SVR12 in the MAS (and FAS) was: genotype (GT)3: 97.5% (80.6%); FibroScan ®  ≥ 12.5 kPa: 98.9% (89.3%); platelet count < 100 × 10 9 /l: 100% (88.2%); both platelets < 150 × 10 9 /l and FibroScan ®  > 20 kPa: 100% (88.9%); aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index > 1.09: 98.7% (83.1%); fibrosis-4 index > 3.25: 98.6% (84.0%); albumin < 3 g/dl: 100% (91.7%); people who use drugs: 97.7% (84.3%); psychiatric disorders: 96.6% (84.8%); and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection: 100% (95.0%). Overall, 26.9% (104/386) of patients experienced an adverse event, none of which were classed as serious., Conclusion: In this real-world cohort, 8 weeks of G/P therapy was well tolerated in TN patients with CC. SVR12 rates were similar to clinical trials, supporting 8-week treatment in TN patients with CC, including those with signs of advanced liver disease and GT3 infection., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background & Aims: According to pivotal clinical trials, cure rates for sofosbuvir-based antiviral therapy exceed 96%. Treatment failure is usually assumed to be because of virological resistance-associated substitutions or clinical risk factors, yet the role of patient-specific genetic factors has not been well explored. We determined if patient-specific genetic factors help predict patients likely to fail sofosbuvir treatment in real-world treatment situations., Methods: We recruited sofosbuvir-treated patients with chronic hepatitis C from five Canadian treatment sites, and performed a case-control pharmacogenomics study assessing both previously published and novel genetic polymorphisms. Specifically studied were variants predicted to impair CES1-dependent production of sofosbuvir's active metabolite, interferon-λ signalling variants expected to impact a patient's immune response to the virus and an HLA variant associated with increased spontaneous and treatment-induced viral clearance., Results: Three hundred and fifty-nine sofosbuvir-treated patients were available for analyses after exclusions, with 34 (9.5%) failing treatment. We identified CES1 variants as novel predictors for treatment failure in European patients (rs115629050 or rs4513095; odds ratio (OR): 5.43; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.64-18.01; P = .0057), replicated associations with IFNL4 variants predicted to increase interferon-λ signalling (eg rs12979860; OR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.25-4.06; P = .0071) and discovered a novel association with a coding variant predicted to enhance the activity of IFNL4's receptor (rs2834167 in IL10RB; OR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.01-3.24; P = .047)., Conclusions: Ultimately, this work demonstrates that patient-specific genetic factors could be used as a tool to identify patients at higher risk of treatment failure and allow for these patients to receive effective therapy sooner., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S . Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background & Aims: HDV affects 4.5-13% of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients globally, yet the prevalence of HDV infection in Canada is unknown. To investigate the prevalence, genotype, demographics, and clinical characteristics of HDV in Canada, we conducted a retrospective analysis of (1) HDV antibody and RNA positivity among referred specimens, and (2) a cross-sectional subset study of 135 HDV seropositive +/-RNA (HDV+) patients compared with 5,132 HBV mono-infected patients in the Canadian HBV Network., Methods: Anti-HDV IgG-positive specimens collected between 2012 and 2019 were RNA tested and the genotype determined. Patients enrolled in the Canadian HBV Network were >18 years of age and HBsAg-positive. Clinical data collected included risk factors, demographics, comorbidities, treatment, fibrosis assessment, and hepatic complications., Results: Of the referred patients, 338/7,080 (4.8%, 95% CI 4.3-5.3) were HDV seropositive, with 219/338 RNA-positive (64.8%, 95% CI 59.6-69.7). The HDV+ cohort were more likely to be born in Canada, to be White or Black/African/Caribbean than Asian, and reporting high-risk behaviours, compared with HBV mono-infected patients. Cirrhosis, complications of end-stage liver disease, and liver transplantation were significantly more frequent in the HDV+ cohort. HDV viraemia was significantly associated with elevated liver transaminases and cirrhosis. Five HDV genotypes were observed among referred patients but no association between genotype and clinical outcome was detected within the HDV+ cohort., Conclusions: Nearly 5% of the Canadian HBV referral population is HDV seropositive. HDV infection is highly associated with risk behaviours and both domestic and foreign-born patients with CHB. HDV was significantly associated with progressive liver disease highlighting the need for increased screening and surveillance of HDV in Canada., Lay Summary: Evidence of HDV infection was observed in approximately 5% of Canadians who were infected with HBV referred to medical specialists. HDV-positive patients were more likely to be male, born in Canada, or White or Black/African/Caribbean compared to Asian, and to have reported high-risk activities such as injection or intranasal drug use or high-risk sexual contact compared with patients infected with only HBV. Patients infected with HDV were also more likely to suffer severe liver disease, including liver cancer, compared with HBV mono-infected patients., Competing Interests: CSC within past 36 months: Grant or contract from Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, GSK; Consulting fees from Janssen Pharmaceuticals; Payment or honoraria from Gilead Sciences (all made to the University of Calgary). The other authors declare no conflicts of interest that pertain to this work. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Crown Copyright © 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL).)

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) affects approximately 8 million Canadians. NAFLD refers to a disease spectrum ranging from bland steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Nearly 25% of patients with NAFLD develop NASH, which can progress to liver cirrhosis and related end-stage complications. Type 2 diabetes and obesity represent the main risk factors for the disease. The Canadian NASH Network is a national collaborative organization of health care professionals and researchers with a primary interest in enhancing understanding, care, education, and research around NAFLD, with a vision of best practices for this disease state. At the 1st International Workshop of the CanNASH network in April 2021, a joint event with the single topic conference of the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver (CASL), clinicians, epidemiologists, basic scientists, and community members came together to share their work under the theme of NASH. This symposium also marked the initiation of collaborations between Canadian and other key opinion leaders in the field representative of international liver associations. The main objective is to develop a policy framework that outlines specific targets, suggested activities, and evidence-based best practices to guide provincial, territorial, and federal organizations in developing multidisciplinary models of care and strategies to address this epidemic., Competing Interests: G Sebastiani has acted as a speaker for Pfizer, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Gilead, and AbbVie, served as an advisory board member for Merck, Gilead, Pfizer, Allergan, Novo Nordisk, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis, and has received research funding from Merck and Theratec. K Patel is a speaker for Gilead Sciences, Intercept, and Abbott, an advisory board/consultant for Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Novartis, and Allergan, and has received research funding from Gilead Sciences. V Ratziu consults for Genfit, Intercept, Galmed, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Madrigal. He has received grants from Gilead. JJ Feld is a consultant/advisor and/or has received research support from AbbVie, Arbutus, Antios, Enanta, Eiger, Finch, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Janssen, and Roche. BA Neuschwander-Tetri is a consultant for Allergan, Allysta, Arrowhead, ARTham, Axcella, Blade, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Coherus, Consynance, Durect, Enanta, Fortress, Gelesis, Gilead, HistoIndex, Intercept, Lipocine, Madrigal, Medimmune, Merck, Metacrine, Mundipharma, NGM, pH-Pharma, Prometheus, and Siemens. He has received institutional research grants from Allergan, BMS, Cirius, CymaBay, Enanta, Galectin, Genfit, Gilead, Intercept, Madrigal, NGM, and Prometheus. M Pinzani is an advisory board/consultant for Promethera (Belgium), Chemomab (Israel), Takeda (USA), LimmaTech Biologics (Switzerland), Resolution Therapeutics (UK), Dicerna (USA), Astra Zeneca (UK). He is a co-founder/director and shareholder of Engitix Therapeutics Ltd (UK) and 3P-Sense Ltd (UK). He is Chief Medical Officer of Hepatotargets/BitBio Ltd (UK). S Petta has been a speaker and/or advisor for AbbVie, Gilead, and Intercept. A Berzigotti has been an advisory board member for Inventiva, Bracco, General Electrics, and Boehringer Ingelheim. EM Brunt has been a study pathologist for CymaBay, Histoindex, and NGM, a consultant for Alnylam/Regeneron Therapeutics, Arrowhead Pharmaceutical, and Perspectum Diagnostics, and a member of the advisory board for Pfizer. A Tang is a speaker for Eli Lilly and has received research support from Siemens. JF Cobbold has received consultancy fees from Novo Nordisk and speaker fees from Intercept. P Ghali has been a consultant for Merck and Gilead. QM Anstee reports grants from AbbVie, Allergan/Tobira, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Glympse Bio, Novartis Pharma AG, Pfizer Ltd., and Vertex. He also reports consultancy for 89Bio, Abbott Laboratories, Acuitas Medical, Allergan/Tobira, Altimmune, AstraZeneca, Axcella, Blade, BMS, BNN Cardio, Celgene, Cirius, CymaBay, EcoR1, E3Bio, Eli Lilly & Company Ltd., Galmed, Genentech, Genfit SA, Gilead, Grunthal, HistoIndex, Indalo, Imperial Innovations, Intercept Pharma Europe Ltd., Inventiva, IQVIA, Janssen, Madrigal, MedImmune, Metacrine, NewGene, NGMBio, North Sea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk A/S, PathAI, Pfizer Ltd., Poxel, ProSciento, Raptor Pharma, Servier, Terns, and Viking Therapeutics. He is a speaker for Abbott Laboratories, Allergan/Tobira, BMS, Clinical Care Options, Falk, Fishawack, Genfit SA, Gilead, Integritas Communications, Kenes, and MedScape. He further reports royalties from Elsevier Ltd. H Bajaj reports receiving grant support from Amgen, Kowa, and Sanofi US Services, and grant support and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen Global Services, and Novo Nordisk. MG Swain served on an advisory board and speakers bureaus for Gilead, Intercept, Abbott, Novartis. He has also received clinical trial funding from Gilead, Intercept, CymaBay, Genkyotex, GSK, and Novartis. A Ramji served on advisory boards and speakers bureaus for Gilead, Intercept, AbbVie, Celgene, Merck, and Novartis. He has also received clinical trial funding AbbVie, Assembly, Gilead, Intercept, Galmed, Janssen, Springbanks, Allergan, and Novartis. The other coauthors have nothing to disclose related to this publication., (Copyright © 2022 Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver.)

Background and Aims: The obesity epidemic has increased the risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in both the general and chronic hepatitis B (CHB) populations. Our study aims to determine the prevalence of NAFLD in patients with CHB based on controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and the epidemiological, clinical, and virological factors associated with severe hepatic steatosis., Methods: The Canadian Hepatitis B Network cohort was utilized to provide a cross-sectional description of demographics, comorbidities, antiviral treatment, and hepatits B virus (HBV) tests. Liver fibrosis and steatosis were measured by transient elastography and CAP, respectively. Any grade and severe steatosis were defined as CAP >248 and >280 dB/m, respectively. Advanced liver fibrosis was defined as transient elastography measurement >10.7 kPa., Results: In 1178 patients with CHB (median age: 47.4%, 57.7% males, 75.7% Asian, 13% African, 6.5% White, 86% HBV e antigen negative, median HBV DNA of 2.44 log 10 IU/mL, 42.7% receiving treatment), the prevalence of any grade and severe steatosis was 53% and 36%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, obesity was a significant predictor for severe steatosis (adjusted odds ratio: 5.046, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-20.93). Severe steatosis was a determinant associated with viral load (adjusted odds ratio: 0.385, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-0.75, P  < .01; r = -0.096, P  = .007) regardless of antiviral therapy, age, and alanine aminotransferase levels., Conclusion: In this large multiethnic CHB population, hepatic steatosis is common. Severe steatosis is independently associated with higher fibrosis, but negatively with HBV DNA, regardless of antiviral therapy history., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Introduction: To determine predictors of hepatic steatosis by the computed attenuation parameter (CAP) and fibrosis via transient elastography (TE) in persons on methotrexate (MTX) therapy with rheumatologic and dermatologic diseases., Methods: A single-centred retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients on >6 months of MTX for a rheumatologic or dermatologic disease who had undergone TE from January 2015 to September 2019 were included. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine predictors of steatosis and fibrosis., Results: A total of 172 patients on methotrexate were included. Psoriasis was the most frequent diagnosis ( n = 55), followed by rheumatoid arthritis ( n = 45) and psoriatic arthritis ( n = 34). Steatosis (CAP ≥245 dB/m) was present in 69.8% of patients. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that diabetes mellitus (OR 10.47, 95% CI 1.42-75.35), hypertension (OR 5.15, 95% CI 1.75-15.38), and BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 (OR 16.47, 95% CI 5.56-45.56) were predictors of steatosis (CAP ≥245 dB/m). Predictors of moderate to severe fibrosis (Metavir ≥F2 = TE ≥8.0 kPa) by multivariate regression analysis included moderate to severe steatosis (CAP ≥270 dB/m) (OR 8.36, 95% CI 1.88-37.14), diabetes mellitus (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.09-7.48), hypertension (OR 5.4, 95% CI 2.23-13.00), dyslipidemia (OR 3.71, 95% CI 1.50-9.18), and moderate alcohol use (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.2-7.49)., Conclusions: In patients on MTX for rheumatologic and dermatologic diseases, hepatic steatosis as measured by CAP was common and moderate to severe steatosis predicted moderate to severe fibrosis., Competing Interests: The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver.)

Background: The current use of ribavirin in difficult-to-cure chronic hepatitis C patients (HCV) and patients with severe respiratory infections is constrained by the issue of ribavirin-induced hemolytic anemia that affects 30% of treated patients, requiring dosage modification or discontinuation. Though some genetic variants have been identified predicting this adverse effect, known clinical and genetic factors do not entirely explain the risk of ribavirin-induced anemia., Methods: We assessed the associations of previously identified variants in inosine triphosphatase (ITPA), solute carrier 28A2 (SLC28A2) and vitamin D receptor (VDR) genes with ribavirin-induced anemia defined as hemoglobin decline of ≥30 g/L on treatment, followed by a staged discovery (n = 114), replication (n = 74), and combined (n = 188) genome-wide association study to uncover potential new predictive variants., Results: We identified a novel association in the gene coding glycophorin C (rs6741425; OR:0.12, 95%CI:0.04-0.34, P = 2.94 × 10 -6 ) that predicts protection against ribavirin-induced anemia. We also replicated the associations of ITPA and VDR genetic variants with the development of ribavirin-induced anemia (rs1127354; OR:0.13, 95%CI:0.04-0.41, P = 8.66 ×10 -5 ; and rs1544410; OR:1.65, 95%CI:1.01-2.70, P = 0.0437)., Conclusions: GYPC variation affecting erythrocyte membrane strength is important in predicting risk for developing ribavirin-induced anemia. ITPA and VDR genetic variants are also important predictors of this adverse reaction., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Alcohol use and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are two leading causes of liver disease. Alcohol use is prevalent among the HCV-infected population and accelerates the progression of HCV-related liver disease. Despite barriers to care faced by HCV-infected patients who use alcohol, few studies have analyzed uptake of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment., Objective: We compared rates of treatment uptake and sustained virological response (SVR) between patients with and without alcohol use., Methods: Prospective data were obtained from the Canadian Network Undertaking against Hepatitis C (CANUHC) cohort. Consenting patients assessed for DAA treatment between January 2016 and December 2019 were included. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between patients with and without alcohol use by means of t -tests, χ 2 tests, and Fisher's Exact Tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine predictors of SVR and treatment initiation., Results: Current alcohol use was reported for 217 of 725 (30%) patients. The proportion of patients initiating DAA treatment did not vary by alcohol use status (82% versus 83%; p  = 0.99). SVR rate was similar between patients with alcohol use and patients without alcohol use (92% versus 94%; p  = 0.45). Univariate and multivariate analysis found no association between alcohol use and SVR or treatment initiation., Conclusion: Patients engaged in HCV treatment have highly favourable treatment uptake and outcomes regardless of alcohol use. Public health interventions should be directed toward facilitating access to care for all patients irrespective of alcohol use. Research into high-level alcohol use and DAA outcomes is needed., Competing Interests: CC is an advisor and speaker with Merck, Gilead, and AbbVie., (Copyright © 2021 Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver.)

Background: Despite the current highly effective therapies with direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs), some patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection still do not achieve sustained virological response (SVR) and require retreatment. Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SVV) is recommended as the first-line retreatment option for most patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of SVV as salvage therapy after at least one course of DAA., Methods: Data were collected on all HCV-infected patients who failed DAAs and were prescribed SVV from a prospective Canadian registry (CANUHC) including 17 sites across Canada. Factors associated with failure to achieve SVR with SVV therapy and the utility of RAS testing and ribavirin use were evaluated., Results: A total of 128 patients received SVV after non-SVR with DAA treatment: 80% male, median age 57.5 (31-86), 44% cirrhotic, and 17 patients post liver transplant. First line regimens included: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (27.3%), sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (26.5%), grazoprevir/elbasvir (12.5%), other (33.5%). Ribavirin was added to SVV in 26 patients due to past sofosbuvir/velpatasvir use (n = 8), complex resistance associated substitution profiles (n = 16) and/or cirrhosis (n = 9). Overall SVR rate was 96% (123/128). Of 35 patients who previously failed sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, 31 (88.5%) achieved SVR compared to 92 of 93 (99%) among those receiving any other regimen (P = .01)., Conclusions: Similar to reports from phase 3 clinical trials, SVV proved highly effective as salvage therapy for patients who failed a previous DAA therapy. Those who failed SVV had at least 2 of the following factors: genotype 3, presence of cirrhosis, past liver transplantation, past exposure to sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and/or complex resistance profiles., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background & Aims: HCV-infected patients with cirrhosis achieve high sustained virological response (SVR) rates with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) even after hepatic decompensation. We aimed to assess the clinical outcome following DAAs among patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis in relation to SVR and changes in model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score., Methods: Consecutive DAA-treated chronic HCV-infected patients with cirrhosis from 4 hepatology clinics were included. The primary endpoint in survival analyses was clinical disease progression, defined as liver failure, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation or death., Results: In total, 868 patients were included with a median age of 59 (IQR 54-65) years; 719 (83%) with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis and 149 (17%) with Child-Pugh B/C cirrhosis. SVR was attained by 647 (90%) Child-Pugh A patients and 120 (81%) Child-Pugh B/C patients. During a median follow-up of 28 (IQR 20-36) months, 102 (14%) Child-Pugh A patients and 96 (64%) Child-Pugh B/C patients experienced clinical disease progression. SVR was independently associated with an improved event-free survival in patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.47; 95% CI 0.27-0.82, p = 0.007), but not in patients with Child-Pugh B/C cirrhosis (adjusted HR 1.23; 95% CI 0.67-2.26; p = 0.51). Twelve weeks post-DAAs, 28 (19%) patients with Child-Pugh B/C cirrhosis had ≥2-point MELD decline, but their 2-year event-free survival did not differ from those with a stable MELD (47.9%; 95% CI 28.7-67.1 vs. 48.9%; 95% CI 38.1-59.7, respectively, p = 0.99)., Conclusions: Among patients with chronic HCV infection, DAA-induced SVR was associated with a reduced risk of clinical disease progression in patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis but not in patients with Child-Pugh B/C cirrhosis. In Child-Pugh B/C cirrhosis, a ≥2-point MELD decline did not translate into improved clinical outcome., Lay Summary: Chronic HCV infection can be cured with antiviral therapy. In this study, we evaluated the long-term effects of antiviral therapy on liver-related complications in patients with cirrhosis. Our results suggest that patients with compensated cirrhosis who were cured of their HCV infection have a lower rate of complications. In contrast, the rate of complications was not related to virological cure among those with decompensated cirrhosis. While these patients seem to remain in need of liver transplantation, antiviral therapy may lower their priority on the liver transplantation waiting list., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest LK, RdM no disclosures. RM received financial compensation for consultancy from AbbVie. AR received grants from AbbVie, Allergen, Assembly, Celgene, Gilead Sciences and Janssen, grants from AbbVie Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Novartis, Merck, and Springbanks. MM BMS, Gilead, Merck (MSD) and AbbVie. MC received personal fees from Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag, Roche, Merck, MSD, Biogen, Falk Foundation, Boehringer Ingelheim, Siemens, and Spring Bank, grants from Roche. HW Grants and personal fees form Gilead Sciences, Abbott, Roche Diagnostics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Roche Diagnostics, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Eiger and Falk and Falk Foundation, personal pfees from Siemens and Janssen, investigator for transgene, non-financial support from MYR-GmbH. RJdK is a consultant and speaker for AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, and Norgine and received grants from Abbvie, Gilead, Janssen, and BMS. HLAJ has received personal fees for consulting from Arbutus, Gilead, Janssen, MedImmune, Merck, Roche, Vir Biotechnology, Viral Clinics, Enyo, Arena, and GlaxoSmithKline, and research support from AbbVie, Arbutus, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, MedImmune, Merck, and Roche. BEH has received personal fees for consulting from Intercept, Cymabay, Mirum, Albireo, Chemomab, and Caliditas, and research support from Intercept, Cymabay, Mirum, and Albireo. JJF has received personal fees for consulting from AbbVie, Enanta, Gilead, Janssen, and Roche, and research funding from AbbVie, Abbott, Gilead, and FUJIFILM Wako Chemicals. AJM received financial compensation for lecture activities for Zambon and research funding from Gilead, MSD, AbbVie and Zambon All authors declare no competing interests. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2020 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In Canada, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most frequently occurring liver disease, affecting one in four Canadians. NAFLD can in turn evolve into non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and cirrhosis. No study in Canada has investigated knowledge of NAFLD among physicians., Methods: Primary care physicians (PCPs); specialists in internal medicine, gastroenterology, and hepatology; and hepatology nurses who were members of the College of Family Physicians of Canada, Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver, or Canadian Association of Hepatology Nurses were invited to participate in this web-based survey., Results: Of 650 invited physicians and nurses, 214 (33%) responded and 171 (26%) completed the whole survey. Overall, 51% of the respondents were PCPs, 38% were specialists, and 11% were nurses. Of these, 58% of PCPs, 28% of specialists, and 39% of nurses responded that they were only somewhat familiar or unfamiliar with NAFLD. Moreover, 53% of PCPs, 20% of specialists, and 35% of nurses thought the prevalence of NAFLD in Canada was 15% or less. Also, 42% of respondents thought that NASH could be diagnosed by imaging or blood tests. Finally, more than 40% of PCPs, 22% of specialists, and 33% of nurses thought that metformin and statin were treatments for NASH., Conclusions: This survey shows that a significant proportion of Canadian physicians and nurses managing patients with NAFLD are not very familiar with the disease. This study emphasizes the need for further provider education, national practice guidelines, and improved treatment options., Competing Interests: GS has acted as speaker for Merck, Gilead, AbbVie, Novonordisk, Novartis, and Pfizer; served as an advisory board member for Pfizer, Merck, Novartis, Gilead, Allergan, and Intercept; and received unrestricted research funding from Merck and Theratec. AR served on advisory boards and speakers bureaus for Gilead, Intercept, AbbVie, Celgene, Merck, and Novartis and received clinical trial funding from AbbVie, Assembly, Gilead, Intercept, Galmed, Janssen, Springbanks, Allergan, and Novartis. MGS served on advisory boards and speakers bureaus for Gilead, Intercept, Abbott, and Novartis and received clinical trial funding from Gilead, Intercept, CymaBay, Genkyotex, GSK, and Novartis. KP is a speaker for Gilead Sciences, Intercept, and Abbott; is advisory board/consultant for Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Novartis, and Allergan; and received research funding from Gilead Sciences., (Copyright © 2021 Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver.)

Due to shared modes of exposure, HIV-HBV co-infection is common worldwide. Increased knowledge of the demographic and clinical characteristics of the co-infected population will allow us to optimize our approach to management of both infections in clinical practice. The Canadian Hepatitis B Network Cohort was utilized to conduct a cross-sectional evaluation of the demographic, biochemical, fibrotic and treatment characteristics of HIV-HBV patients and a comparator HBV group. From a total of 5996 HBV-infected patients, 335 HIV-HBV patients were identified. HIV-HBV patients were characterized by older median age, higher male and lower Asian proportion, more advanced fibrosis and higher anti-HBV therapy use (91% vs. 30%) than the HBV-positive / HIV seronegative comparator group. A history of reported high-risk exposure activities (drug use, high-risk sexual contact) was more common in HIV-HBV patients. HIV-HBV patients with reported high-risk exposure activities had higher male proportion, more Caucasian ethnicity and higher prevalence of cirrhosis than HIV-HBV patients born in an endemic country. In the main cohort, age ≥60 years, male sex, elevated ALT, the presence of comorbidity and HCV seropositivity were independent predictors of significant fibrosis. HIV seropositivity was not an independent predictor of advanced fibrosis (adj OR 0.75 [95%CI: 0.34-1.67]). In conclusion, Canadian co-infected patients differed considerably from those with mono-infection. Furthermore, HIV-HBV-infected patients who report high-risk behaviours and those born in endemic countries represent two distinct subpopulations, which should be considered when engaging these patients in care., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Obesity and cirrhosis are associated with poor hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine responses, but vaccine efficacy has not been assessed in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Sixty-eight HBV-naïve adults with NAFLD were enrolled through the Canadian HBV network and completed three-dose HBV or HBV/HAV vaccine (Engerix-B ® , or Twinrix ® , GlaxoSmithKline). Anti-HBs titers were measured at 1-3 months post third dose. In 31/68 subjects enrolled at the coordinating-site, T-cell proliferation and follicular T-helper cells (pTFH) were assessed using PBMC. Immune response was also studied in NAFLD mice. NAFLD patients were stratified as low-risk-obesity, BMI < 35 (N = 40) vs. medium-high-risk obesity, BMI > 35 (N = 28). Anti-HBs titers were lower in medium/high-risk obesity, 385 IU/L ± 79 vs. low-risk obesity class, 642 IU/L ± 68.2, p = 0.02. High-risk obesity cases, N = 14 showed lower vaccine-specific-CD3+ CD4+ T-cell response compared to low-risk obesity patients, N = 17, p = 0.02. Low vaccine responders showed dysfunctional pTFH. NAFLD mice showed lower anti-HBs levels and T-cell response vs. controls. In conclusion, we report here that obese individuals with NAFLD exhibit decreased HBV vaccine-specific immune responses.

Background: Canada was the first country to approve elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) for the treatment of chronic HCV infection for genotypes 1 and 4 with or without ribavirin and genotype 3 with sofosbuvir, with no recommendation for baseline resistance testing. The aim of this study was to describe the effectiveness of EBR/GZR and the profile of patients selected for treatment in a Canadian real-world setting., Methods: This multicenter retrospective study of HCV-infected patients treated with EBR/GZR took place among selected Canadian health care providers, with no exclusion criteria. Primary outcome measures included parameters associated with patient profile and sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12) and 24 weeks after treatment., Results: A total of 408 patients were included; 244 had available SVR12 information (per-protocol population [PP]). Genotype distribution included 1a (54.7%), 1b (17.2%), 3 (11.8%), 4 (10.0%), and other (6.4%). The majority (88.7%) of participants were treated for 12 weeks without ribavirin. Fifty-nine (14.5%) participants, predominantly with genotype 1a (49/59) infection, were tested for baseline resistance-associated substitutions (bRAS). SVR12 was achieved by 95.9% of the PP. In an exploratory analysis assessing potential predictors of SVR12, participants who had undergone bRAS testing (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.64) and participants who had undergone liver transplant (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.00-0.68) had significantly lower odds of achieving SVR12., Conclusions: This study supports the real-world effectiveness of EBR/GZR-including a broad range of genotypes and diverse fibrosis stages-in the absence of bRAS testing and in special populations., Competing Interests: ET reports grants/personal fees from Merck Canada, AbbVie, and Gilead and personal fees from BMS and Pendopharm. JT reports no conflict of interest. CF reports grants from ViiV Healthcare and AbbVie. BC reports grants/honoraria from AbbVie, Gilead, and Merck. AR reports grants/personal fees/other from AbbVie and Merck and other from Allergen, Arbutus, and Assembly Bio; research/grants/personal fees and other from Gilead Sciences; personal fees/other from Janssen; and other from Novartis. SB reports other from Merck Canada; personal fees from Merck Canada; and grants from Gilead Canada. KT reports grants from Merck Canada and personal fees from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, and Merck. EMY reports grants from Merck Canada, Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, Merck Inc., Janssen, Intercept, Genfit, and Springbank and personal fees from AbbVie, Gilead Canada, Merck Canada, and Celgene Canada. BR reports grants from Merck Canada and personal fees from AbbVie, Shire, Merck Canada, Takeda, Allergan, and Ferring. GM reports grants from Merck Canada and support from the HCV program at CUPS from Merck, Gilead, AbbVie, and Coverdale. AW reports grants/personal fees from Merck Canada, Gilead Sciences Canada, and AbbVie. CC reports grants/personal fees and non-financial support from Merck and grants/personal fees/non-financial support from Gilead and AbbVie. KP reports personal fees from Merck and Gilead Sciences. MP reports personal fees from Merck, Gilead, and AbbVie. KS reports grants/personal fees from Merck, Gilead, and AbbVie. BT reports no conflict of interest. LD reports grants from Gilead and Merck and personal fees from AbbVie, Gilead, and Merck. KD reports grants from Merck and Gilead and other from AbbVie. PG reports personal fees from Merck. SSL reports grants/personal fees from AbbVie, Intercept, Gilead, and Merck and grants from BMS. JHB and JBT were employed by Merck Canada Inc at time of study., (Copyright © 2020 Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver.)

Background: Treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate has been associated with renal toxicity or reductions in bone mineral density, or both, in some patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Tenofovir alafenamide is a tenofovir prodrug with high intrahepatic concentrations of active drug and reduced systemic tenofovir exposures compared with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. In patients with chronic HBV, tenofovir alafenamide has shown efficacy non-inferior to that of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with improved renal and bone safety. With this non-inferiority study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide in patients with HBV infection switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate who are virally suppressed., Methods: Patients with chronic HBV infection who had been receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for 48 weeks or more and who had HBV DNA less than the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) for at least 12 weeks were recruited to this randomised, multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority study. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg once a day or to continue tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg once a day. The primary efficacy endpoint was loss of virological control, defined as the proportion of patients who received at least one dose of study drug who had HBV DNA of at least 20 IU/mL at week 48 by the modified US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) snapshot algorithm. Key safety endpoints were changes in hip and spine bone mineral density, estimated creatinine clearance by Cockcroft-Gault, and markers of bone turnover and renal tubular function. The study was powered for non-inferiority in efficacy of tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with a 4% margin. Investigators and patients were unaware of treatment allocation and on-treatment results. This trial is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02979613., Findings: Participants in this study were enrolled between Dec 29, 2016, and Oct 20, 2017. 541 patients were screened and 490 patients were randomly assigned to switch to tenofovir alafenamide or to stay on tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Two patients assigned to receive tenofovir alafenamide did not receive treatment; thus the full analysis set for efficacy and safety analyses consisted of 243 patients in the tenofovir alafenamide group and 245 in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group. At week 48, one patient from each treatment group (both <1%) had HBV DNA of at least 20 IU/mL (difference in proportion 0·0%, 95% CI -1·9 to 2·0), thereby showing non-inferior efficacy of tenofovir alafenamide to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Patients who received tenofovir alafenamide had significantly increased bone mineral density at hip (mean change 0·66% [SD 2·08] vs -0·51% [SD 1·91]; difference in least square means 1·17% [95% CI 0·80 to 1·54; p<0·0001]) and at spine (mean change 1·74% [3·46] vs -0·11% [3·13]; difference in least square means 1·85% [1·24 to 2·46; p<0·0001]), creatinine clearance by Cockcroft-Gault relative to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (median change 0·94 mL/min [IQR -4·47 to 6·24] vs -2·74 mL/min [-7·89 to 1·88]; p <0·0001), and improved markers of bone turnover and tubular function at week 48. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were upper respiratory tract infection (18 [7%] of 243 patients in the tenofovir alafenamide group and 16 [7%] of 245 patients in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group) and nasopharyngitis (13 [5%] of 243 patients in the tenofovir alafenamide group and 12 [5%] of 245 patients in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group). The incidence of grade 3 and above adverse events and serious adverse events was low and similar between groups. No viral resistance was observed in patients who qualified for viral sequencing., Interpretation: These findings suggest that tenofovir alafenamide can be substituted for tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in patients with HBV infection for improved safety without a loss of efficacy., Funding: Gilead Sciences., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Long-term use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) reduces bone mineral density (BMD). Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), a new prodrug of tenofovir, has shown non-inferior efficacy to TDF in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, with improved bone effects at 48 weeks. We performed a randomized trial to evaluate the bone safety of TAF compared with TDF over 2 years, assessing baseline risk factors for bone loss, were evaluated after 2 years of treatment., Methods: In a double-blind study, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients (n = 873) and HBeAg-negative patients (n = 425) were randomly assigned (2:1) to groups given TAF (25 mg; n = 866) or TDF (300 mg; n = 432) once daily. We assessed bone safety, including hip and spine BMD, using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and measured changes in serum markers of bone turnover over 96 weeks., Results: At baseline, treatment groups were well matched. At week 96, patients receiving TAF had significantly smaller decreases in hip BMD (mean reduction of 0.33%) than patients receiving TDF (mean reduction of 2.51%) (P < .001) and spine BMD (reduction of 0.75% in patients receiving patients receiving TAF vs reduction of 2.57% in patients receiving TDF) (P < .001). For hip BMD, the magnitude of difference in bone loss between the TAF and TDF groups increased at week 96 compared to week 48 (P < .001). The TAF group had minimal changes in markers of bone turnover by 12 weeks of treatment, but the TDF group had significant changes, compared to baseline. Risk factors for bone loss had fewer effects in patients receiving TAF than TDF at week 96., Conclusions: In double-blind randomized trials, we found that after 2 years of treatment, patients receiving TAF had continued improvements in bone safety compared with patients receiving TDF. Clinicaltrial.gov ID NCT01940471 and NCT01940341., (Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Competing interests: Hemant Shah reports personal fees from AbbVie, Gilead, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Intercept, Janssen, Merck, Roche and Lupin, and grants from Janssen and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Marc Bilodeau reports personal fees from AbbVie, Gilead, GSK, Merck, Vertex and Roche, and grants from Merck and GSK, during the conduct of the study, and reports grants from Synageva, Verlyx and Bristol-Myers Squibb, and personal fees from Verlyx, outside the submitted work. Kelly Burak reports grants from Bayer, Verlyx and Lupin, and personal fees from Merck, Astellas, Bayer, Gilead and Amgen, outside the submitted work. Curtis Cooper reports grants and personal fees from Gilead, Merck and AbbVie, outside the submitted work. Marina Klein reports grants from ViiV Healthcare, Merck and Janssen, and consulting fees from ViiV Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie and Merck. Alnoor Ramji reports a grant from Gilead; personal fees for clinical trials from AbbVie, Gilead, Janssen, Intercept, Lupin and Merck; and other fees from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Allergen, Gilead, Janssen, Intercept, Novartis and Merck, outside the submitted work. Dan Smyth reports personal fees from AbbVie, Merck and Gilead, and grants from AbbVie and Gilead, outside the submitted work. Jordan Feld reports grants and personal fees from AbbVie, Merck, Gilead and Janssen; personal fees from Contravir; and grants from Abbott, outside the submitted work. No other competing interests were declared.

Background: Patients chronically infected with genotype 3 hepatitis C virus (HCV) have faster disease progression and are less responsive to current direct-acting antiviral regimens than patients infected with other genotypes. We conducted an open-label trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir plus ribavirin in patients with genotype 3 HCV infection., Methods: We enrolled treatment-naive patients with and without compensated cirrhosis at 15 sites in Canada. All patients were treated with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir (90 mg and 400 mg) plus weight-based ribavirin for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12). Secondary endpoints included evaluation of baseline and treatment-emergent drug resistance., Results: Of the 111 patients enrolled, 105 (95%) had subtype 3a HCV and 39 (35%) had compensated cirrhosis. SVR12 was achieved by 99 of 111 patients (89%; 95% confidence interval, 82%-94%). Of the 39 patients with cirrhosis, 31 (79%) achieved SVR12, compared with 68 of 72 (94%) patients without cirrhosis. No treatment-emergent resistance mutations occurred in those who failed treatment. One patient discontinued treatment due to liver cancer and died 22 days after treatment discontinuation. The most common adverse events were fatigue (51%), headache (36%), and nausea (23%)., Conclusions: In this multicenter trial involving treatment-naive patients with genotype 3 HCV, 12 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir provided a high level of SVR in those without cirrhosis., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02413593., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background & Aims: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have revolutionized treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, leading to a high rates of sustained virologic response. This study assessed the real-world safety and effectiveness of DAA-based antiviral therapy for the treatment of cirrhotic patients with chronic HCV infection., Methods: This international, multicenter cohort study included all consecutive patients with chronic HCV infection and cirrhosis who underwent antiviral therapy with second-generation DAAs. Data on all patients were analyzed to assess treatment response. Predictors of hepatic decompensation during antiviral therapy were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression analyses., Results: Until June 2015, 433 cirrhotic patients with chronic HCV infection started DAA-based treatment. Their mean age was 57.8 (±8.7) years, 277 (64.0%) patients were male, and 114 (26.3%) had a Child-Pugh (CP) score of B/C cirrhosis. The sustained virologic response rate at 12 weeks was similar among patients with a CP score of A (261 of 304 [85.9%]) and a CP score of B/C (83 of 101 [82.2%]; P = .37). A baseline albumin level less than 35 g/L (hazard ratio [HR], 3.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-7.84; P = .005), baseline MELD score of 14 or higher (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.03-2.61; P = .037), and HCV genotype 3 (HR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.09-3.88; P = .033) were associated independently with hepatic decompensation during antiviral treatment among patients with a CP score of B/C., Conclusions: This large cohort study showed that therapy is safe and effective in patients with compensated (CP score of A) cirrhosis. For patients with decompensated (CP score of B/C) cirrhosis, albumin level less than 35 g/L, MELD score of 14 or greater, and HCV genotype 3 are important risk factors for hepatic decompensation during DAA-based treatment. Therefore, these patients require close monitoring during antiviral therapy or treatment should be deferred until after transplantation., (Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Effective and well-tolerated, interferon-free regimens are needed for treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and cirrhosis., Objective: All-oral therapy with daclatasvir (nonstructural protein 5A [NS5A] inhibitor), asunaprevir (NS3 protease inhibitor), and beclabuvir (nonnucleoside NS5B inhibitor), with or without ribavirin, was evaluated in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection and compensated cirrhosis., Design, Setting, and Participants: The UNITY-2 study was conducted between December 2013 and October 2014 at 49 outpatient sites in the United States, Canada, France, and Australia. Patients were treated for 12 weeks, with 24 weeks of follow-up after completion of treatment. Adult patients with cirrhosis were enrolled in 2 cohorts: HCV treatment-naive or HCV treatment-experienced. Statistical analyses were based on historical controls; there were no internal controls., Interventions: All patients received twice-daily treatment with the fixed-dose combination of daclatasvir (30 mg), asunaprevir (200 mg), and beclabuvir (75 mg). In addition, patients within each cohort were stratified according to HCV genotype 1 subtype (1a or 1b) and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive double-blinded weight-based ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/d) or matching placebo., Main Outcomes and Measures: Sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12)., Results: One hundred twelve patients in the treatment-naive group and 90 patients in the treatment-experienced group were treated and included in the analysis. Enrolled patients were 88% white with a median age of 58 years (treatment-naive group) or 60 years (treatment-experienced group); 74% had genotype 1a infection. SVR12 rates were 98% (97.5% CI, 88.9%-100%) for patients in the treatment-naive group and 93% (97.5% CI, 85.0%-100.0%) for those in the treatment-experienced group when ribavirin was included in the regimen. With the fixed-dose combination alone, response rates were 93% (97.5% CI, 85.4%-100.0%) for patients in the treatment-naive group and 87% (97.5% CI, 75.3%-98.0%) for those in the treatment-experienced group. Three serious adverse events were considered to be treatment related and there were 4 adverse event-related discontinuations. Treatment-emergent grade 3 or 4 alanine aminotransferase elevations were observed in 4 patients, of which 1 had concomitant total bilirubin elevation., Conclusions and Relevance: In this open-label uncontrolled study, patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection and cirrhosis who received a 12-week oral fixed-dose regimen of daclatasvir, asunaprevir, and beclabuvir, with or without ribavirin, achieved high rates of SVR12.

Background: Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major cause of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver transplantation., Objective: To estimate the burden of HCV-related disease and costs from a Canadian perspective., Methods: Using a system dynamic framework, the authors quantified the HCV-infected population, disease progression and costs in Canada between 1950 and 2035. Specifically, 36 hypothetical, age- and sex-defined cohorts were tracked to define HCV prevalence, complications and direct medical costs (excluding the cost of antivirals). Model assumptions and costs were extracted from the literature with an emphasis on Canadian data. No incremental increase in antiviral treatment over current levels was assumed, despite the future availability of potent antivirals., Results: The estimated prevalence of viremic hepatitis C cases peaked in 2003 at 260,000 individuals (uncertainty interval 192,460 to 319,880), reached 251,990 (uncertainty interval 177,890 to 314,800) by 2013 and is expected to decline to 188,190 (uncertainty interval 124,330 to 247,200) in 2035. However, the prevalence of advanced liver disease is increasing. The peak annual number of patients with compensated cirrhosis (n=36,210), decompensated cirrhosis (n=3380), hepatocellular carcinoma (n=2220) and liver-related deaths (n=1880) are expected to occur between 2031 and 2035. During this interval, an estimated 32,460 HCV-infected individuals will die of liver-related causes. Total health care costs associated with HCV (excluding treatment) are expected to increase by 60% from 2013 until the peak in 2032, with the majority attributable to cirrhosis and its complications (81% in 2032 versus 56% in 2013). The lifetime cost for an individual with HCV infection in 2013 was estimated to be $64,694., Conclusions: Although the prevalence of HCV in Canada is decreasing, cases of advanced liver disease and health care costs continue to rise. These results will facilitate disease forecasting, resource planning and the development of rational management strategies for HCV in Canada.

Unlabelled: Mericitabine is a selective nucleoside analog inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS5B RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, with activity across all HCV genotypes. Treatment-naïve patients infected with HCV genotype 1 or 4 were randomized to 24 weeks of double-blind treatment with either mericitabine 1,000 mg (N = 81) or placebo (N = 85) twice-daily (BID) in combination with pegylated interferon alpha-2a (Peg-IFNα-2a)/ribavirin (RBV). Patients randomized to mericitabine with HCV RNA <15 IU/mL from week 4 to 22 (extended rapid virologic response; eRVR) stopped all treatment at week 24; all other patients continued Peg-IFNα-2a/RBV to complete 48 weeks of treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response (SVR; HCV RNA <15 IU/mL after 24 weeks of treatment-free follow-up). SVR was achieved in 56.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 45.9-67.0) of mericitabine-treated patients and 36.5% (95% CI: 27.0-47.1) of placebo-treated patients (Δ = 20.3%; 95% CI 5.5-35.2). SVR rates were higher in mericitabine- than placebo-treated patients when subdivided by IL28B genotype (CC, 77.8% versus 56.0%; non-CC, 44.1% versus 16.2%) and hepatic fibrosis (noncirrhotic, 63.3% versus 41.9%; cirrhotic, 38.1% versus 21.7%). Overall relapse rates were 27.7% and 32.0% in mericitabine- and placebo-treated patients, respectively. No evidence of NS5B S282T-variant virus or phenotypic resistance to mericitabine was observed in the one patient who experienced partial response. No S282T variants were detected in any baseline samples. The safety profile of mericitabine was similar to that of, and fewer patients in the mericitabine than in the placebo group discontinued treatment for safety reasons., Conclusion: A 24-week response-guided combination regimen of mericitabine 1,000 mg BID plus Peg-IFNα-2a/RBV is well tolerated and more effective than a standard 48-week course of Peg-IFNα-2a/RBV., (Copyright © 2013 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Chronic hepatitis C remains a significant medical and economic burden in Canada, affecting nearly 1% of the population. Since the last consensus conference on the management of chronic hepatitis C, major advances have warranted a review of recommended management approaches for these patients. Specifically, direct-acting antiviral agents with dramatically improved rates of virological clearance compared with standard therapy have been developed, and several single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with an increased probability of spontaneous and treatment-induced viral clearance have been identified. In light of this new evidence, a consensus development conference was held in November 2011; the present document highlights the results of the presentations and discussions surrounding these issues. It reviews the epidemiology of hepatitis C in Canada, preferred diagnostic testing approaches and recommendations for the treatment of chronically infected patients with the newly approved protease inhibitors (boceprevir and telaprevir), including those who have previously failed pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy. In addition, recommendations are made regarding approaches to reducing the burden of hepatitis C in Canada.