Search

Antibiotics are compounds that have a particular mode of action upon the microorganism they are targeting. However, discovering and developing new antibiotics is a challenging and timely process. Antibiotic development process can take up to 10-15 years and over $1billion to develop a single new therapeutic product. Rapid screening tools to understand the mode of action of the new antimicrobial agent are considered one of the main bottle necks in the antimicrobial agent development process. Classical approaches require multifarious microbiological methods and they do not capture important biochemical and organism therapeutic-interaction mechanisms. This work aims to provide a rapid antibiotic-antimicrobial biochemical diagnostic tool to reduce the timeframes of therapeutic development, while also generating new biochemical insight into an antimicrobial-therapeutic screening assay in a complex matrix. The work evaluates the effect of antimicrobial action through "traditional" microbiological analysis techniques with a high-throughput rapid analysis method using UV-VIS spectroscopy and chemometrics. Bacteriostatic activity from tetracycline and bactericidal activity from amoxicillin were evaluated on a system using non-resistant Escherichia coli O157:H7 by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and UV-VIS spectroscopy (high-throughput analysis). The data were analysed using principal component analysis (PCA) and support vector machine (SVM) classification. The rapid diagnostic technique could easily identify differences between bacteriostatic and bactericidal mechanisms and was considerably quicker than the "traditional" methods tested.

Polatuzumab vedotin (Pola) is an approved therapy in combination with rituximab and bendamustine for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (RR-DLBCL) based on positive results of the landmark phase II randomised G029365 trial. However, trial results for many approved novel therapies in RR-DLBCL have not been replicated in routine care cohorts, as RR-DLBCL patient populations are heterogeneous and trial eligibility is increasingly restrictive. We evaluated outcomes from pola ± bendamustine and rituximab in patients with RR-DLBCL enrolled in a compassionate access program with no alternative treatment options identified via the Australasian Lymphoma and Related Diseases Registry according to their eligibility for the original phase II published study. Of 58 eligible patients, 74% met the criteria deeming them ineligible for the G029365 original study at the time of pola's commencement. Median progression-free survival and overall survival in our cohort were 2.3 and 3.5 months, respectively. In contrast to the landmark trial cohort, more of our patients ceased therapy prior to completion, the majority due to progressive disease and only 8/58 received any subsequent treatment. Dismal outcomes in this Australian real-world population demonstrate trial eligibility is challenging to meet, and newer treatments can be difficult to deliver in routine care. Clinically applicable results from therapeutic studies require trial cohorts to reflect representative clinical populations wherever possible, and more research is required to address the benefit of novel agents in the increasing majority who are ineligible for modern studies., Competing Interests: Briony Shaw, Eliza Chung, Edward Yoo, Rory Bennett, Callum Birks, Jock Simpson, Sumita Ratnasingam, Tasman Armytage, Denise Lee, Colm Keane, Stephanie Wallwork all declare no conflicts of interest. Anna Johnston: Consulting or advisory role, honoraria: Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Roche, Link, BeiGene, Sanofi, EUSA Pharma, Novartis, Chan Y Cheah: Consulting or advisory role, honoraria: Roche, Janssen, Gilead, AstraZenecca, Lilly, TG therapeutics, BeiGene, Novartis, Menarini, Dizal, AbbVie, Genmab, Bristol Myers Quibb; Research funding: Bristol Myers Quibb, Roche, AbbVie, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Lilly, Nada Hamad: Honoraria: Roche, Janssen, Gilead, AstraZenecca, BeiGene, Novartis, AbbVie, Genmab, Bristol Myers Quibb, Takeda, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Incyte, Pfizer, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Terumo, Allison Barraclough: Honoraria: Roche, Gilead, Novartis, BeiGene, Matthew Ku: Roche, Antengene, Genor BioPharma, Nicholas Viiala: Honoraria and advisory board: Novartis, Tara Cochrane: Consulting or advisory role: Janssen; Honoraria: Celgene (in 2019); Research funding: BeiGene, Geoffrey Chong: Research funding: Bristol Myers Quibb, Merck, AstraZeneca, Pharmacyclics, Regeneron, Hutchmed, Bayer, Incyte, Amgen, Kate Manos: Advisory/honoraria: AbbVie; Research funding: Roche, Stephen Opat: Honoraria: AbbVie, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Quibb, CSL Behring, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Roche, Takeda; Research funding: AbbVie, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, CSL Behring, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, PharmaCytics, Roche, Takeda, Eliza A. Hawkes: Consulting or advisory role: Roche, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Antengene, Novartis, Regeneron, Janssen, Specialised Therapeutics; Research funding: Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck KGaA, AstraZeneca, Merck, (© 2024 The Authors. eJHaem published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Abstract: CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) achieve high response rates in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, their use is associated with significant toxicity, relapse concern, and unclear broad tractability. Preclinical and clinical data support a beneficial synergistic effect of ibrutinib on apheresis product fitness, CAR-T expansion, and toxicity. We evaluated the combination of time-limited ibrutinib and CTL019 CAR-T in 20 patients with MCL in the phase 2 TARMAC study. Ibrutinib commenced before leukapheresis and continued through CAR-T manufacture for a minimum of 6 months after CAR-T administration. The median prior lines of therapy was 2; 50% of patients were previously exposed to a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi). The primary end point was 4-month postinfusion complete response (CR) rate, and secondary end points included safety and subgroup analysis based on TP53 aberrancy. The primary end point was met; 80% of patients demonstrated CR, with 70% and 40% demonstrating measurable residual disease negativity by flow cytometry and molecular methods, respectively. At 13-month median follow-up, the estimated 12-month progression-free survival was 75% and overall survival 100%. Fifteen patients (75%) developed cytokine release syndrome; 12 (55%) with grade 1 to 2 and 3 (20%) with grade 3. Reversible grade 1 to 2 neurotoxicity was observed in 2 patients (10%). Efficacy was preserved irrespective of prior BTKi exposure or TP53 mutation. Deep responses correlated with robust CAR-T expansion and a less exhausted baseline T-cell phenotype. Overall, the safety and efficacy of the combination of BTKi and T-cell redirecting immunotherapy appears promising and merits further exploration. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04234061., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is an emerging treatment for patients with primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, its impact on renal function is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate incidence and clinical factors predictive of severe to end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) after SABR for RCC., Methods and Materials: This was a Single institutional retrospective analysis of patients with diagnosed primary RCC receiving SABR between 2012-2020. Adult patients with no metastatic disease, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥ 30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , and at least one post-SABR eGFR at six months or later were included in this analysis. Patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma were excluded. Primary outcome was freedom from severe to end-stage CKD, determined using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. The impact of baseline CKD, age, hypertension, diabetes, tumor size and fractionation schedule were assessed by Cox proportional hazard models., Results: Seventy-eight consecutive patients were included, with median age of 77.8 years (IQR 70-83), tumor size of 4.5 cm (IQR 3.9-5.8) and follow-up of 42.2 months (IQR 23-60). Baseline median eGFR was 58 mls/min; 55% (n = 43) of patients had baseline CKD stage 3 and the remainder stage 1-2. By last follow-up, 1/35 (2.8%) of baseline CKD 1-2, 7/27 (25.9%) CKD 3a and 11/16 (68.8%) CKD 3b had developed CKD stage 4-5. The estimated probability of freedom from CKD stage 4-5 at 1 and 5 years was 89.6% (CI 83.0-97.6) and 65% (CI 51.4-81.7) respectively. On univariable analysis, worse baseline CKD (p < 0.0001) and multi-fraction SABR (p = 0.005) were predictive for development of stage 4-5 CKD though only the former remained significant in multivariable model., Conclusion: In this elderly cohort with pre-existing renal dysfunction, SABR achieved satisfactory nephron sparing with acceptable rates of severe to end-stage CKD. It can be an attractive option in patients who are medically inoperable., (© 2024. Crown.)

Objectives: Dietary patterns, characterised by protein, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and vitamin D, reduce the odds of malnutrition in cancer survivors. However, it is unclear whether these dietary patterns also improve prognosis. This study prospectively examined associations between dietary patterns linked to lower odds of malnutrition and the risk of all-cause and cancer mortality in adult cancer survivors from the UK Biobank cohort., Design: Prospective observational study., Setting and Participants: Cancer survivors from the UK Biobank (mean ± SD, 7.1 ± 6.3 years since diagnosis) were included (n = 2415; 59.7 ± 7.1 years; 60.7% female)., Measurements: Dietary intake was estimated using the Oxford WebQ 24-h dietary assessment. Dietary patterns ('high oily fish and nuts', and 'low oily fish') were derived using reduced rank regression (response variables: protein (g/kg/day), polyunsaturated fatty acids (g/day) and vitamin D (μg/day)). Cox proportional hazard models estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all-cause and cancer mortality. Nonlinear relationships were examined using restricted cubic splines. Models were adjusted for demographic and health characteristics. Sub-group analyses investigated relationships in sub-samples of adults with i) high nutritional risk (lung, gastrointestinal, haematological, or head and neck tumours) and ii) recent cancer diagnosis (cancer diagnosis within two years prior to assessment)., Results: Deaths due to all-causes (n = 305) and cancer (n = 249) were identified during a median 10.4 (IQR: 10.2-10.8) years follow-up. There were no statistically significant linear associations between the dietary patterns and all-cause or cancer mortality. However, a U-shaped association between the 'high oily fish and nuts' pattern, characterised by higher intake of oily fish and nuts and seeds, and all-cause mortality (p-non-linearity = 0.004) was identified, as well as with all-cause (p-non-linearity = 0.006) and cancer mortality (p-non-linearity = 0.035) in adults with a high nutritional risk cancer diagnosis (lung, gastrointestinal, haematological, or head and neck tumours), indicating that both above and below mean intake was associated with increased risk. The 'low oily fish' pattern, characterised by lower oily fish but higher potato intake, also had a non-linear association with all-cause mortality (p-non-linearity = 0.046) where lower but not higher than mean intake increased mortality risk. No dietary patterns were significantly associated with mortality in adults with a recent cancer diagnosis., Conclusion: 'High oily fish and nuts' or 'low oily fish' dietary patterns that were protective against malnutrition were associated with risk of all-cause and cancer mortality in adults with cancer. Future research should assess the efficacy of these dietary patterns in the acute treatment period when malnutrition is most prevalent., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.

Aim: To explore the relationship between social care-related quality of life (SCrQoL) for caregivers of a child with a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE; such as SCN2A and Dravet syndrome) and health literacy, illness perceptions, and caregiver activation., Method: As part of a larger pre-post pilot study of an information linker service, caregivers completed a baseline questionnaire which included demographics and measures to assess SCrQoL, health literacy, illness perceptions, and caregiver activation. We used Spearman's Rho to determine relationships between variables., Results: Seventy-two caregivers completed the questionnaire. Total SCrQoL varied widely, ranging from an 'ideal state' to 'high needs state'. Caregivers most frequently reported high needs regarding doing activities they enjoy and looking after themselves. Total SCrQoL was correlated with cognitive (r[70] = -0.414, p < 0.000) and emotional representations of illness (r[70] = -0.503, p < 0.000), but not coherence (r = -0.075, p = 0.529). Total SCrQoL was not correlated with health literacy (r[70] = 0.125, p = 0.295) or caregiver activation (r[70] = 0.181, p = 0.127)., Interpretation: Future research should explore whether interventions that help caregivers cognitively reframe the negative experiences of having a child with a DEE, and support them to partake in activities they enjoy, boost their SCrQoL., What This Paper Adds: Caregiver social care-related quality of life (SCrQoL) varied widely, from 'ideal state' to 'high needs state'. Most common high needs were doing enjoyable activities and self-care. Caregivers with higher SCrQoL may perceive their child's illness as less threatening. SCrQoL does not appear to be related to caregiver activation in this sample., (© 2023 The Authors. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Mac Keith Press.)

The purpose of this document is to provide guidance for establishing and maintaining growth and development of flow cytometry shared resource laboratories. While the best practices offered in this manuscript are not intended to be universal or exhaustive, they do outline key goals that should be prioritized to achieve operational excellence and meet the needs of the scientific community. Additionally, this document provides information on available technologies and software relevant to shared resource laboratories. This manuscript builds on the work of Barsky et al. 2016 published in Cytometry Part A and incorporates recent advancements in cytometric technology. A flow cytometer is a specialized piece of technology that require special care and consideration in its housing and operations. As with any scientific equipment, a thorough evaluation of the location, space requirements, auxiliary resources, and support is crucial for successful operation. This comprehensive resource has been written by past and present members of the International Society for Advancement of Cytometry (ISAC) Shared Resource Laboratory (SRL) Emerging Leaders Program https://isac-net.org/general/custom.asp?page=SRL-Emerging-Leaders with extensive expertise in managing flow cytometry SRLs from around the world in different settings including academia and industry. It is intended to assist in establishing a new flow cytometry SRL, re-purposing an existing space into such a facility, or adding a flow cytometer to an individual lab in academia or industry. This resource reviews the available cytometry technologies, the operational requirements, and best practices in SRL staffing and management., (© 2023 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.)

Purpose: The Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis Variant Curation Expert Panel (VCEP) was established by the International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours and the Clinical Genome Resource, who set out to develop recommendations for the interpretation of germline APC variants underlying Familial Adenomatous Polyposis, the most frequent hereditary polyposis syndrome., Methods: Through a rigorous process of database analysis, literature review, and expert elicitation, the APC VCEP derived gene-specific modifications to the ACMG/AMP (American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and Association for Molecular Pathology) variant classification guidelines and validated such criteria through the pilot classification of 58 variants., Results: The APC-specific criteria represented gene- and disease-informed specifications, including a quantitative approach to allele frequency thresholds, a stepwise decision tool for truncating variants, and semiquantitative evaluations of experimental and clinical data. Using the APC-specific criteria, 47% (27/58) of pilot variants were reclassified including 14 previous variants of uncertain significance (VUS)., Conclusion: The APC-specific ACMG/AMP criteria preserved the classification of well-characterized variants on ClinVar while substantially reducing the number of VUS by 56% (14/25). Moving forward, the APC VCEP will continue to interpret prioritized lists of VUS, the results of which will represent the most authoritative variant classification for widespread clinical use., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest SEP is a member of the scientific advisory panel of Baylor Genetics Laboratories. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest. Ethics Declaration This study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Bonn and the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. Participants of clinical genetic testing gave written informed consent for their data to be used for clinical research and genetic investigations according to local regulations., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Infectious diarrhoea is common post-allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (alloHSCT). While the epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) post-alloHSCT has been described, the impact of other diarrhoeal pathogens is uncertain. We reviewed all alloHSCT between 2017 and 2022 at a single large transplant centre; 374 patients were identified and included. The 1-year incidence of infectious diarrhoea was 23%, divided into viral (13/374, 3%), CDI (65/374, 17%) and other bacterial infections (16/374, 4%). There was a significant association between infectious diarrhoea within 1 year post-transplant and the occurrence of severe acute lower gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD, OR = 4.64, 95% CI 2.57-8.38, p < 0.001) and inferior GVHD-free, relapse-free survival on analysis adjusted for age, donor type, stem cell source and T-cell depletion (aHR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.18-2.27, p = 0.003). When the classes of infectious diarrhoea were compared to no infection, bacterial (OR = 6.38, 95% CI 1.90-21.40, p = 0.003), CDI (OR = 3.80, 95% CI 1.91-7.53, p < 0.001) and multiple infections (OR = 11.16, 95% CI 2.84-43.92, p < 0.001) were all independently associated with a higher risk of severe GI GVHD. Conversely, viral infections were not (OR = 2.98, 95% CI 0.57-15.43, p = 0.20). Non-viral infectious diarrhoea is significantly associated with the development of GVHD. Research to examine whether the prevention of infectious diarrhoea via infection control measures or modulation of the microbiome reduces the incidence of GVHD is needed., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Aim: Physiotherapy is an established treatment strategy for low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). However, data on its efficacy are limited. This is in part due to the inherent challenges in study design in this context. This systematic review aims to analyse the methodology of studies using pelvic floor physiotherapy for treatment of LARS to elucidate the challenges and limitations faced, which may inform the design of future prospective trials., Methodology: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken through MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library, yielding 345 unique records for screening. Five studies were identified for review. Content thematic analysis of study limitations was carried out using the Braun and Clarke method. Line-by-line coding was used to organize implicit and explicit challenges and limitations under broad organizing categories., Results: Key challenges fell into five overarching categories: patient-related issues, cancer-related issues, adequate symptomatic control, intervention-related issues and measurement of outcomes. Adherence, attrition and randomization contributed to potential bias within these studies, with imbalance in the baseline patient characteristics, particularly gender and baseline pelvic floor function scores. Outcome measurements consisted of patient-reported measures and quality of life measures, where significant improvements in bowel function according to patient-reported outcome measures were not reflected in the quality of life scores., Conclusion: Upcoming trial design in the area of pelvic floor physiotherapy for faecal incontinence related to rectal cancer surgery can be cognisant of and design around the challenges identified in this systematic review, including the reduction of bias, exclusion of the placebo effect and the potential cultural differences in attitude towards a sensitive intervention., (© 2024 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

In this clinicopathological conference, invited experts discussed a previously published case of a patient with nonischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent heart transplantation from a genetically modified pig source animal. His complex course included detection of porcine cytomegalovirus by plasma microbial cell-free DNA and eventual xenograft failure. The objectives of the session included discussion of selection of immunosuppressive regimens and prophylactic antimicrobials for human xenograft recipients, description of infectious disease risk assessment and mitigation in potential xenograft donors and understanding of screening and therapeutic strategies for potential xenograft-related infections., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Cancers of the central nervous system (CNS) are unique with respect to their tumor microenvironment. Such a status is due to immune-privilege and the cellular behaviors within a highly networked, neural-rich milieu. During tumor development in the CNS, neural, immune and cancer cells establish complex cell-to-cell communication networks which mimic physiological functions, including paracrine signaling and synapse-like formations. This crosstalk regulates diverse pathological functions contributing to tumor progression. In the CNS, regulation of physiological and pathological functions relies on various cell signaling and transcription programs. At the core of these events lies the cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) response element binding protein (CREB), a master transcriptional regulator in the CNS. CREB is a kinase inducible transcription factor which regulates many CNS functions, including neurogenesis, neuronal survival, neuronal activation and long-term memory. Here, we discuss how CREB-regulated mechanisms operating in diverse cell types, which control development and function of the CNS, are co-opted in CNS tumors., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Crown Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Surveillance of invasive fungal infection (IFI) requires laborious review of multiple sources of clinical information, while applying complex criteria to effectively identify relevant infections. These processes can be automated using artificial intelligence (AI) methodologies, including applying natural language processing (NLP) to clinical reports. However, developing a practically useful automated IFI surveillance tool requires consideration of the implementation context. We employed the Design Thinking Framework (DTF) to focus on the needs of end users of the tool to ensure sustained user engagement and enable its prospective validation. DTF allowed iterative generation of ideas and refinement of the final digital health solution. We believe this approach is key to increasing the likelihood that the solution will be implemented in clinical practice.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a cornerstone of treatment for many solid organ malignancies. Alongside increasing use, the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) has also increased and remains a significant challenge when treating patients with ICI. The underlying pathophysiology of irAE development for many organ systems is yet to be elucidated, but may involve unmasking of latent autoimmunity, increased T-cell recognition of shared antigens on cancer and normal tissue and ICI-triggered immune dysregulation with overactivation of proinflammatory pathways and suppression of immune control pathways. Management strategies for irAEs have historically been borrowed from paradigms for conventional autoimmune conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease and autoimmune hepatitis; however, recent translational efforts have clearly demonstrated key differences in underlying immune signalling pathways. As we begin to understand these differences, we must adapt a more targeted approach to immunosuppression and exercise a more nuanced approach with the multiple biologic agents available to mitigate ICI-related toxicity without reversing the antitumour effect of ICI. In this review, we focus on three key immune-related toxicities where recent clinical and translational work has provided nuanced insights into pathogenesis and treatment strategies: enterocolitis, hepatitis and cardiovascular toxicity including myocarditis., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Utilisation of whole organ volumes to extract anatomical and functional information from computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) images may provide key information for the treatment and follow-up of cancer patients. However, manual organ segmentation, is laborious and time-consuming. In this study, a CT-based deep learning method and a multi-atlas method were evaluated for segmenting the liver and spleen on CT images to extract quantitative tracer information from Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([ 18 F]FDG) PET images of 50 patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Manual segmentation was used as the reference method. The two automatic methods were also compared with a manually defined volume of interest (VOI) within the organ, a technique commonly performed in clinical settings. Both automatic methods provided accurate CT segmentations, with the deep learning method outperforming the multi-atlas with a DICE coefficient of 0.93 ± 0.03 (mean ± standard deviation) in liver and 0.87 ± 0.17 in spleen compared to 0.87 ± 0.05 (liver) and 0.78 ± 0.11 (spleen) for the multi-atlas. Similarly, a mean relative error of -3.2% for the liver and -3.4% for the spleen across patients was found for the mean standardized uptake value (SUV mean ) using the deep learning regions while the corresponding errors for the multi-atlas method were -4.7% and -9.2%, respectively. For the maximum SUV (SUV max ), both methods resulted in higher than 20% overestimation due to the extension of organ boundaries to include neighbouring, high-uptake regions. The conservative VOI method which did not extend into neighbouring tissues, provided a more accurate SUV max estimate. In conclusion, the automatic, and particularly the deep learning method could be used to rapidly extract information of the SUV mean within the liver and spleen. However, activity from neighbouring organs and lesions can lead to high biases in SUV max and current practices of manually defining a volume of interest in the organ should be considered instead., (Creative Commons Attribution license.)

Background: Little is known about the short- and long-term healthcare costs of invasive Scedosporium/Lomentospora prolificans infections, particularly in patient groups without haematological malignancy. This study investigated excess index hospitalization costs and cumulative costs of these infections. The predictors of excess cost and length of stay (LOS) of index hospitalization were determined. These estimates serve as valuable inputs for cost-effectiveness models of novel antifungal agents., Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted at six Australian hospitals. Cases of proven/probable invasive Scedosporium/L. prolificans infections between 2011 and 2021 (n = 34) were matched with controls (n = 66) by predefined criteria. Cost data were retrieved from activity-based costing systems and analysis was performed from the Australian public hospital perspective. All costs were presented in 2022 Australian dollars (AUD). Median regression analysis was used to adjust excess costs of index hospitalization whereas cumulative costs up to 1.5 years follow-up were estimated using interval-partitioned survival probabilities., Results: Invasive Scedosporium/L. prolificans infections were independently associated with an adjusted median excess cost of AUD36 422 (P = 0.003) and LOS of 16.27 days (P < 0.001) during index hospitalization. Inpatient stay was the major cost driver (42.7%), followed by pharmacy cost, of which antifungal agents comprised 23.8% of the total cost. Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant increased the excess cost (P = 0.013) and prolonged LOS (P < 0.001) whereas inpatient death within ≤28 days reduced both cost (P = 0.001) and LOS (P < 0.001). The median cumulative cost increased substantially to AUD203 292 over 1.5 years in cases with Scedosporium/L. prolificans infections., Conclusions: The economic burden associated with invasive Scedosporium/L. prolificans infections is substantial., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: X-linked reticular pigmentary disorder (XLPDR) is a rare condition characterized by skin hyperpigmentation, ectodermal features, multiorgan inflammation, and recurrent infections. All probands identified to date share the same intronic hemizygous POLA1 hypomorphic variant (NM&#95;001330360.2(POLA1):c.1393-354A > G) on the X chromosome. Previous studies have supported excessive type 1 interferon (IFN) inflammation and natural killer (NK) cell dysfunction in disease pathogenesis. Common null polymorphisms in filaggrin (FLG) gene underlie ichthyosis vulgaris and atopic predisposition., Case: A 9-year-old boy born to non-consanguineous parents developed eczema with reticular skin hyperpigmentation in early infancy. He suffered recurrent chest infections with chronic cough, clubbing, and asthma, moderate allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with keratitis, multiple food allergies, and vomiting with growth failure. Imaging demonstrated bronchiectasis, while gastroscopy identified chronic eosinophilic gastroduodenitis. Interestingly, growth failure and bronchiectasis improved over time without specific treatment., Methods: Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) using Illumina short-read sequencing was followed by both manual and orthogonal automated bioinformatic analyses for single-nucleotide variants, small insertions/deletions (indels), and larger copy number variations. NK cell cytotoxic function was assessed using 51 Cr release and degranulation assays. The presence of an interferon signature was investigated using a panel of six interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) by QPCR., Results: WGS identified a de novo hemizygous intronic variant in POLA1 (NM&#95;001330360.2(POLA1):c.1393-354A > G) giving a diagnosis of XLPDR, as well as a heterozygous nonsense FLG variant (NM&#95;002016.2(FLG):c.441del, NP&#95;0020.1:p.(Arg151Glyfs*43)). Compared to healthy controls, the IFN signature was elevated although the degree moderated over time with the improvement in his chest disease. NK cell functional studies showed normal cytotoxicity and degranulation., Conclusion: This patient had multiple atopic manifestations affecting eye, skin, chest, and gut, complicating the presentation of XLPDR. This highlights that common FLG polymorphisms should always be considered when assessing genotype-phenotype correlations of other genetic variation in patients with atopic symptoms. Additionally, while the patient exhibited an enhanced IFN signature, he does not have an NK cell defect, suggesting this may not be a constant feature of XLPDR., (© 2023. Crown.)

What Is This Summary About?: This summary is about the ongoing research study called TALAPRO-3. This study is testing the use of two medicines called talazoparib and enzalutamide. The two medicines are being used together as a treatment for patients with a type of cancer called metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer and changes in specific DNA repair genes within their tumors. The study began in May 2021, and includes 599 patients from 27 countries., What Is Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer?: Metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer is known as mCSPC for short. It is cancer that has started in the prostate and spread to other body parts. The prostate is a gland below the bladder and helps make semen (the liquid that contains sperm). Castration-sensitive means that the cancer responds to treatments that lower testosterone in the blood., Which Medicines Are Being Tested?: In this study, some patients will take talazoparib plus enzalutamide while others will take a placebo plus enzalutamide. Talazoparib and enzalutamide are two different cancer medicines. Talazoparib is not currently used to treat patients with mCSPC. Enzalutamide is used to treat patients with prostate cancer. Talazoparib plus enzalutamide is being compared with a placebo plus enzalutamide to see if patients live longer without their cancer getting worse, or them dying, when taking talazoparib plus enzalutamide or when taking a placebo plus enzalutamide., What Are the Aims of the Talapro-3 Study?: This study aims to find out if treatment with talazoparib plus enzalutamide increases the length of time the patients in the study live without their cancer getting worse, or them dying, compared with treatment with a placebo plus enzalutamide. The study will also measure how long the patients in the study live, the number and types of side effects they have, their general health and quality of life, and whether there are changes in how patients report their pain. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03395197 (TALAPRO-2) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Objectives: To evaluate a co-designed intervention using digital resources "Vietnam Cancer Caring Coping" (V-CCC) on the health literacy, depression, and quality of life of caregivers supporting a cancer patient in oncology hospitals in Vietnam., Methods: A pre-post quantitative evaluation with adult cancer caregivers across regional Oncology hospitals in Vietnam (Ho Chi Minh City, Da Nang, Can Tho, and Hue). Participants completed baseline and follow-up measures of health literacy (HLS-SF12) depression (PHQ-9) and Health-related Quality of Life (5Q-5D-5L). Participants accessed and reviewed V-CCC for a 2-week period., Results: Two hundred and thirty-four caregivers completed pre and post-tests. Most participants were female ( n  = 143, 61%), married ( n  = 165, 70%), aged 18-44 ( n  = 155, 66%), lived rurally ( n  = 157, 67%). All health literacy scores of participants in post-intervention were significantly higher than that in pre-intervention across all domain's healthcare, disease prevention, and health promotion as well as the total score ( p  < 0.001). A significant reduction in the proportion of caregivers reporting PHQ-9 moderately severe/severe depression post-intervention was demonstrated (10.2 vs. 6.1%, respectively ( p  ≤ 0.001). No significant differences were observed pre and post-intervention across four 5Q-5D-5L health dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, and pain/discomfort. Regarding anxiety/depression as measured by 5Q-5D-5L the proportion of participants who reported having moderate, severe, and extreme problems in pre- and post-intervention was statistically significant (32 vs. 24%), respectively ( p  = 0.0028)., Conclusion: Co-designed digital resources can reduce health literacy inequities and improve psychological outcomes for cancer caregivers.

Objectives: Examine the understanding of terminologies and management patterns of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-unresponsive nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in six territories in Asia-Pacific., Methods: This study involved two phases: (1) a survey with 32 urologists and 7 medical oncologists (MOs) and (2) a factorial experiment and in-depth interviews with 23 urologists and 2 MOs. All clinicians had ≥8 years' experience managing NMIBC patients in Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan. Data from Phase 1 were summarized using descriptive statistics; content and thematic analyses applied in Phase 2., Results: In phase 1, 35% of clinicians defined BCG-unresponsive as BCG-refractory, -relapse and -resistant, 6% defined it as BCG-refractory and -relapse; 22% classified BCG-failure as BCG-refractory, -relapse, -resistant, and when muscle-invasive bladder cancer is detected. If eligible and willing, 50% (interquartile range [IQR], 50%-80%) of BCG-unresponsive patients would undergo radical cystectomy (RC), and 50% (IQR 20%-50%) of RC-eligible patients would receive bladder-sparing treatment or surveillance. In phase 2, we found that 32%, 88%, and 48% of clinicians, respectively, used "BCG-unresponsive," "BCG-refractory," and "BCG-relapse" in clinical practice but with no consistent interpretation of the terms. Compared with EAU definitions, 8%-60% of clinicians appropriately classified 9 tumor types that are persistent or recurrent after adequate BCG. Fifty percent of clinicians mentioned a lack of bladder-preserving treatment that outperforms RC in quality of life as a reason to retreat BCG-unresponsive patients with BCG., Conclusions: Our study revealed varied understanding and application of BCG-unresponsive terminologies in practice. There is a need for a uniform and simple definition of BCG-unresponsive disease in Asia-Pacific., (© 2023 Merck Sharp & Dohme, LLC and The Authors. International Journal of Urology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Urological Association.)

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are detected in up to one third of patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The current standard of care for unresectable stage III NSCLC is consolidation durvalumab for patients who have not progressed following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (the 'PACIFIC regimen'). However, the benefit of immunotherapy, specifically in patients with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm) tumors, is not well characterized, and this treatment approach is not recommended in these patients, based on a recent ESMO consensus statement. EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have demonstrated significant improvements in patient outcomes in EGFRm metastatic NSCLC. The benefits of these agents have also translated to patients with EGFRm early-stage resectable disease as adjuvant therapy. The role of EGFR-TKIs has yet to be prospectively characterized in the unresectable setting. Preliminary efficacy signals for EGFR-TKIs in unresectable EGFRm stage III NSCLC have been reported from a limited number of subgroup and retrospective studies. Several clinical trials are ongoing assessing the safety and efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in this patient population. Here, we review the current management of unresectable EGFRm stage III NSCLC. We outline the rationale for investigating EGFR-TKI strategies in this setting and discuss ongoing studies. Finally, we discuss the evidence gaps and future challenges for treating patients with unresectable EGFRm stage III NSCLC., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Terufumi Kato reports consulting/advisory roles: AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Daiichi-Sankyo, Janssen, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer; honoraria: Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck KGaA, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda; employment (spouse): Eli Lilly and company; research support (to institution): AbbVie Inc., Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Blueprint Medicines, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly and Company, HaiHe Biopharma, Merck KGaA, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Takeda, Turning Point Therapeutics Inc. Ignacio Casarini reports local principal investigator role: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche (non-financial and for institution); principal investigator role for multiple clinical studies: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis; principal investigator role for one clinical study: Roche. Corinne Faivre-Finn reports research funding: AstraZeneca, and Elekta; travel expenses: AstraZeneca, Elekta, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and CF-F’s institution; and uncompensated relationships: AstraZeneca, Elekta, and Merck Sharpe & Dohme. CF-F is supported by a grant from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Manchester Biomedical Research Centre. Fiona Hegi-Johnson reports research funding: AstraZeneca; honoraria: AstraZeneca; payment or honoraria for lectures and presentations: BeiGene, Merck Sharpe & Dohme. Participation on an advisory board: AstraZeneca. FH-J is supported by the Victorian Cancer Agency. Shun Lu reports consulting/advisory roles: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GenomiCare Biotechnology, Hutchison MediPharma Ltd., Pfizer, prIME Oncology, Roche, Simcere Pharmaceutical Group, Yuhan, Zai Lab; speaker’s bureau: AstraZeneca, Hansoh Pharmaceutical Group Co. Ltd., Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Company Ltd., Roche; research funding (to institution): AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Hansoh Pharmaceutical Group Co. Ltd., Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Company Ltd., Hutchison MediPharma Ltd., Lilly Suzhou Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Roche. Mustafa Özgüroğlu reports consulting/advisory roles: Astellas (to self and institution), Janssen, Sanofi; honoraria: Astellas (to self and institution), Janssen, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi. Suresh S. Ramalingam reports consulting/advisory roles: Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, Merck & Co. Inc., Takeda Inc., Tesaro; research funding: Amgen Inc., Advaxis Inc., AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genmab, Merck & Co. Inc., Takeda, Tesaro Inc. Manuel Cobo declares no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: At the primary analysis, the APHINITY trial reported a statistically significant but modest benefit of adding pertuzumab to standard adjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab in patients with histologically confirmed human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early-stage breast cancer. This study evaluated whether the 80-gene molecular subtyping signature (80-GS) could identify patients within the APHINITY population who derive the most benefit from dual anti-HER2 therapy., Methods: In a nested case-control study design of 1,023 patients (matched event to control ratio of 3:1), the 80-GS classified breast tumors into functional luminal type, HER2 type, or basal type. Additionally, 80-GS distinguished tumor subtypes that exhibited a single-dominant functional pathway versus tumors with multiple activated pathways. The primary end point was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) were evaluated by Cox regression. After excluding patients without appropriate consent and those with missing data, 964 patients were included., Results: The 80-GS classified 50% (n = 479) of tumors as luminal type, 28% (n = 275) as HER2 type, and 22% (n = 209) as basal type. Most luminal-type tumors (86%) displayed a single-activated pathway, whereas 49% of HER2-type and 42% of basal-type tumors were dual activated. There was no significant difference in IDFS among different conventional 80-GS subtypes (single- and dual-activated subtypes combined). However, basal single-subtype tumors were significantly more likely to have an IDFS event (hazard ratio, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.12 to 2.54]) compared with other subtypes. HER2 single-subtype tumors displayed a trend toward greater beneficial effect on the addition of pertuzumab (hazard ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.27 to 1.16]) compared with all other subtypes., Conclusion: The 80-GS identified subgroups of histologically confirmed HER2-positive tumors with distinct biological characteristics. Basal single-subtype tumors exhibit an inferior prognosis compared with other subgroups and may be candidates for additional therapeutic strategies. Preliminary results suggest patients with HER2-positive, genomically HER2 single-subtype tumors may particularly benefit from added pertuzumab, which warrants further investigation.

Aims: This economic evaluation of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) versus previous standard of care (SOC; salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell rescue) in the second line (2L) large B-cell lymphoma population is an update of previous economic models that contained immature survival data., Methods: This analysis is based on primary overall survival (OS) ZUMA-7 clinical trial data (median follow-up of 47.2 months), from a United States (US) payer perspective, with a model time horizon of 50 years. Mixture cure models were used to extrapolate updated survival data; subsequent treatment data and costs were updated. Patients who remained in the event-free survival state by 5 years were assumed to have achieved long-term remission and not require subsequent treatment., Results: Substantial survival and quality of life benefits were observed despite 57% of patients in the SOC arm receiving subsequent cellular therapy: median model-projected (ZUMA-7 trial Kaplan-Meier estimated) OS was 78 months (median not reached) for axi-cel versus 25 months (31 months) for SOC, resulting in incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY) difference of 1.63 in favor of axi-cel. Incrementally higher subsequent treatment costs were observed in the SOC arm due to substantial crossover to cellular therapies, thus, when considering the generally accepted willingness to pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY in the US, axi-cel was cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $98,040 per QALY., Conclusions: Results remained consistent across a wide range of sensitivity and scenario analysis, including a crossover adjusted analysis, suggesting that the mature OS data has significantly reduced the uncertainty of axi-cel's cost-effectiveness in the 2L setting in the US. Deferring treatment with CAR T therapies after attempting a path to transplant may result in excess mortality, lower quality of life and would be an inefficient use of resources relative to 2L axi-cel.

Background: Despite robust evidence and international guidelines, to support routine pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing, integration in practice has been limited. This study explored clinicians' views and experiences of pre-treatment DPYD and UGT1A1 gene testing and barriers to and enablers of routine clinical implementation., Methods: A study-specific 17-question survey was emailed (01 February-12 April 2022) to clinicians from the Medical Oncology Group of Australia (MOGA), the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia (COSA) and International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Data were analysed and reported using descriptive statistics., Results: Responses were collected from 156 clinicians (78% medical oncologists, 22% pharmacists). Median response rate of 8% (ranged from 6% to 24%) across all organisations. Only 21% routinely test for DPYD and 1% for UGT1A1. For patients undergoing curative/palliative intent treatments, clinicians reported intent to implement genotype-guided dosing by reducing FP dose for DPYD intermediate metabolisers (79%/94%), avoiding FP for DPYD poor metabolisers (68%/90%), and reducing irinotecan dose for UGT1A1 poor metabolisers (84%, palliative setting only). Barriers to implementation included: lack of financial reimbursements (82%) and perceived lengthy test turnaround time (76%). Most Clinicians identified a dedicated program coordinator, i.e., PGx pharmacist (74%) and availability of resources for education/training (74%) as enablers to implementation., Conclusion: PGx testing is not routinely practised despite robust evidence for its impact on clinical decision making in curative and palliative settings. Research data, education and implementation studies may overcome clinicians' hesitancy to follow guidelines, especially for curative intent treatments, and may overcome other identified barriers to routine clinical implementation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Sarcopenia, the age-related decline in muscle function, places a considerable burden on health-care systems. While the stereotypic hallmarks of sarcopenia are well characterized, their contribution to muscle wasting remains elusive, which is partly due to the limited availability of animal models. Here, we have performed cellular and molecular characterization of skeletal muscle from the African killifish-an extremely short-lived vertebrate-revealing that while many characteristics deteriorate with increasing age, supporting the use of killifish as a model for sarcopenia research, some features surprisingly reverse to an "early-life" state in the extremely old stages. This suggests that in extremely old animals, there may be mechanisms that prevent further deterioration of skeletal muscle, contributing to an extension of life span. In line with this, we report a reduction in mortality rates in extremely old killifish. To identify mechanisms for this phenomenon, we used a systems metabolomics approach, which revealed that during aging there is a striking depletion of triglycerides, mimicking a state of calorie restriction. This results in the activation of mitohormesis, increasing Sirt1 levels, which improves lipid metabolism and maintains nutrient homeostasis in extremely old animals. Pharmacological induction of Sirt1 in aged animals was sufficient to induce a late life-like metabolic profile, supporting its role in life span extension in vertebrate populations that are naturally long-lived. Collectively, our results demonstrate that killifish are not only a novel model to study the biological processes that govern sarcopenia, but they also provide a unique vertebrate system to dissect the regulation of longevity., (© 2023 The Authors. Aging Cell published by Anatomical Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Clinical indications for ibrutinib reimbursement in Australia should consider the inclusion of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) harboring prognostically unfavorable TP53/IGHV genomic aberrations. This study assessed the cost effectiveness of five first-line treatment strategies in CLL for young (aged ≤ 65 years), fit patients without significant comorbidities: (1) no testing (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab [FCR] for all), (2) test for del(17p) only, (3) test for TP53 gene mutation status, (4) test for TP53 and IGHV gene mutation status and (5) no testing (ibrutinib for all)., Method: A decision analytic model (decision tree and partitioned survival model) was developed from the Australian healthcare system perspective with a lifetime horizon. Comparative treatment effects were estimated from indirect treatment comparisons and survival analysis using several studies. Costs, utility and adverse events were derived from public literature sources. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses explored the impact of modeling uncertainties on outcomes., Results: Strategy 1 was associated with 5.69 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost 458,836 Australian dollars (AUD). All other strategies had greater effectiveness but were more expensive than Strategy 1. At the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 100,000 AUD per QALY gained, Strategy 1 was most cost effective with an estimated probability of 68.8%. Strategy 4 was cost effective between thresholds 155,000-432,300 AUD per QALY gained, and Strategy 5 >432,300 AUD per QALY gained., Conclusion: Population targeting using mutation testing for TP53 and IGHV when performed with del(17p) testing specifically in the context of frontline ibrutinib choice does not make a cost-ineffective treatment into a cost-effective treatment., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Treatment options are limited for patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with disease recurrence after bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treatment and who are ineligible for/refuse radical cystectomy. FGFR alterations are commonly detected in NMIBC. We evaluated the activity of oral erdafitinib, a selective pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, versus intravesical chemotherapy in patients with high-risk NMIBC and select FGFR3/2 alterations following recurrence after BCG treatment., Patients and Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with recurrent, BCG-treated, papillary-only high-risk NMIBC (high-grade Ta/T1) and select FGFR alterations refusing or ineligible for radical cystectomy were randomized to 6 mg daily oral erdafitinib or investigator's choice of intravesical chemotherapy (mitomycin C or gemcitabine). The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). The key secondary endpoint was safety., Results: Study enrollment was discontinued due to slow accrual. Seventy-three patients were randomized 2 : 1 to erdafitinib (n = 49) and chemotherapy (n = 24). Median follow-up for RFS was 13.4 months for both groups. Median RFS was not reached for erdafitinib [95% confidence interval (CI) 16.9 months-not estimable] and was 11.6 months (95% CI 6.4-20.1 months) for chemotherapy, with an estimated hazard ratio of 0.28 (95% CI 0.1-0.6; nominal P value = 0.0008). In this population, safety results were generally consistent with known profiles for erdafitinib and chemotherapy., Conclusions: Erdafitinib prolonged RFS compared with intravesical chemotherapy in patients with papillary-only, high-risk NMIBC harboring FGFR alterations who had disease recurrence after BCG therapy and refused or were ineligible for radical cystectomy., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The Ph1 oncology trial landscape is evolving in response to advances in understanding of cancer biology, novel drug discovery platforms, and therapeutic modalities. To uncover emerging trends in oncology drug development, we identified 7,061 solid tumour Ph1 trials (2009-2021) from clinicaltrials.gov to determine the numbers of trials commenced, therapeutic classes, combinations, tumour streams, and geographical distribution. Ph1 oncology trials increased by an average of 5.2 %/year. There was a significant relative increase in the number of immunotherapy studies and a significant relative decrease in trials containing chemotherapy. Between 2009 and 2021, multi-agent combination trials outnumbered single-agent trials and single-class trials outnumbered multimodal combination trials. The proportion conducted in the Asia-Pacific significantly increased. Multiregional trials decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, reducing projected trial numbers in Asia-Pacific and Europe whilst increasing single-region trials in North America. Further study is required to track recovery post-pandemic, and the emergence of novel modalities (e.g. ADCs and cellular therapies)., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. Richard Kelly •No disclosures Ben Tran •Research Funding: Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Genentech, Ipsen, Janssen, Pfizer, Movember, MSD •Honorarium: Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Sanofi, Tolmar •Consulting/Advisory: Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, IQVIA, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Tolmar Jayesh Desai •Consulting or Advisory Role: BeiGene, Pierre Fabre, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, KGaA, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche/Genentech, Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Novartis, Pfizer, Ellipses Pharma, Axelia Oncology, Amgen •Research Funding: Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, BeiGene, Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca/MedImmune Christina Guo •Research Funding: US DoD, Wellcome Trust •Current employee of Genentech Inc. The work presented herein is not affiliated with her current employment., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Background: A recent randomised trial demonstrated [ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in combination with low-dose CT (FDG-PET/CT), compared to standard of care computed tomography (CT) imaging, positively impacted antimicrobial management and outcomes of acute leukaemia and haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients with persistent and recurrent neutropenic fever. We conducted an economic evaluation from a healthcare perspective alongside the clinical trial., Methods: Unit costs in Australian dollars were applied to all resources used (antimicrobials, diagnostic tests, ICU and hospital bed days). Effectiveness was measured as number of patients with antimicrobial rationalisation, 6-month mortality and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from patient-reported trial-based health-related quality-of-life. Generalised linear models were used to analyse costs and outcomes. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for all outcomes and net monetary benefit (NMB) for QALYs were calculated. We performed bootstrapping with 1000 replications using the recycled predictions method., Results: The adjusted healthcare costs were lower for FDG-PET/CT (mean $49,563; 95%CI 36,867, 65,133) compared to CT (mean $57,574; 95% CI 44,837, 73,347). The difference in QALYs between the two groups was small (0.001; 95% CI -0.001, 0.004). When simulated 1000 times, FDG-PET/CT was the dominant strategy as it was cheaper with better outcomes than the standard CT group in 74% of simulations. The estimated NMBs at willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50,000 and $100,000 per QALY were positive, thus FDG-PET/CT remained cost-effective at these thresholds., Conclusions: FDG-PET/CT is cost effective when compared to CT for investigation of persistent/recurrent neutropenic fever in high-risk patients, providing further support for incorporation of FDG-PET/CT into clinical guidelines and funding., Trial Registration: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03429387., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Radiation-induced meningiomas (RIM) are the most common secondary neoplasm post cranial radiotherapy, yet optimal surveillance and treatment strategies remain contentious. Herein, we report the clinical outcomes and radiological growth rate of RIM, diagnosed in a cohort of survivors undergoing MRI screening, with the objective of informing clinical guidelines and practice., Materials and Methods: Long-term survivors of paediatric or young-adult malignancies, diagnosed with RIM between 1990 and 2015, were identified. Absolute (AGR) and relative (RGR) volumetric growth rates were calculated. Rapid growth was defined as AGR > 2 cm 3 /year or AGR > 1 cm 3 /year and RGR ≥ 30% RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (87 RIM) were included. Median age at first RIM diagnosis was 33.9 (range,13.8-54.1) years. Seventy-seven (88%) RIM were asymptomatic at detection. Median follow-up time from first RIM detection was 11 (range, 0.6-28) years. Median absolute and relative volumetric growth rates were 0.05 (IQR 0.01-0.11) cm 3 and 26 (IQR 7-79) % per year, respectively. Two (3.3%) RIM demonstrated rapid growth. Active surveillance was adopted for 67 (77%) RIM in 40 patients. Neurological sequelae due to RIM progression were reported in 5% of patients on active surveillance. Surgery was performed for 33 RIM (30 patients): 18 (54.5%) at diagnosis and 15 (45.5%) after active surveillance. Histopathology was WHO Grade 1 (85.2%), 2 (11.1%), 3 (3.7%). Following resection, 10-year local recurrence rate was 12%. During follow-up, 19 (37%) survivors developed multiple RIM., Conclusions: Asymptomatic RIM are typically low-grade tumours which exhibit slow growth. Active surveillance appears to be a safe initial strategy for asymptomatic RIM, associated with a low rate of neurological morbidity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: In the Phase I/III IMpower133 study, first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide (CP/ET) treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival versus placebo plus CP/ET. We explored patient and disease characteristics associated with long-term survival in IMpower133, and associations of differential gene expression and SCLC-A (ASCL1-driven), SCLC-N (NEUROD1-driven), SCLC-P (POU2F3-driven), and SCLC-inflamed (SCLC-I) transcriptional subtypes with long-term survival., Materials and Methods: Patients with previously untreated ES-SCLC were randomized 1:1 to four 21-day cycles of CP/ET with atezolizumab or placebo. Long-term survivors (LTS) were defined as patients who lived ≥ 18 months post randomization. A generalized linear model was used to evaluate the odds of living ≥ 18 months. Differential gene expression was analyzed using RNA-sequencing data in LTS and non-LTS. OS was assessed by T-effector and B-cell gene signature expression. Distribution of SCLC transcriptional subtypes was assessed in LTS and non-LTS., Results: More LTS were in the atezolizumab arm (34%) than in the placebo arm (20%). The odds ratio for living ≥ 18 months in the atezolizumab arm versus the placebo arm was 2.1 (P < 0.03). Enhanced immune-related signaling was seen in LTS in both arms. Exploratory OS analyses showed atezolizumab treatment benefit versus placebo across T-effector and B-cell gene signature expression subgroups. A higher proportion of LTS than non-LTS in both arms had the SCLC-I subtype; this difference was particularly pronounced in the atezolizumab arm., Conclusion: These exploratory analyses suggest that long-term survival is more likely with atezolizumab than placebo in ES-SCLC, confirming the treatment benefit of the IMpower133 regimen., Clinicaltrial: gov Identifier: NCT02763579., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: S.V.L. declares grants or contracts from Alkermes, Bayer, Blueprint, Bristol Myers Squibb, Elevation Oncology, Genentech, Lilly, Merck, Merus, Pfizer, Rain Therapeutics, RAPT, Turning Point Therapeutics; consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Blueprint, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Elevation Oncology, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, Guardant Health, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, Merck/Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, Turning Point Therapeutics; and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring or Advisory Board for Candel Therapeutics. T.S.K.M. declares consulting and advisory personal fees from AbbVie, Inc., ACEA Pharma, Alpha Biopharma Co. Ltd., Amgen, Amoy Diagnostics Co. Ltd., AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Blueprint Medicines Corporation, CStone Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Fishawack Facilitate Ltd., geneDecode (uncompensated), Gritstone Oncology Inc., Guardant Health, Hengrui Therapeutics, Ignyta Inc., IQVIA, Incyte Corporation, Janssen, Lilly, Loxo-Oncology, Lunit USA, Inc., Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mirati Therapeutics Inc., Novartis, OrigiMed, Pfizer, Inc., Puma Biotechnology Inc., Roche, Sanofi-Aventis R&D, Takeda, Yuhan Corporation, SFJ Pharmaceuticals, Curio Science, Inivata, Berry Oncology, Qiming Development (HK) Ltd., Gilead Sciences, Inc., Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and Covidien LP; lecture personal fees from ACEA Pharmaceuticals, Alpha Biopharma Co. Ltd., Amgen, Amoy Diagnostics Co. Ltd., AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Fishawack Facilitate Ltd., geneDecode, (uncompensated), InMed Medical Communication, Janssen, Lilly, Lunit USA, Inc., MD Health (Brazil), Medscape/WebMD, Merck Serono, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, OrigiMed, PeerVoice, Physicians’ Education Resource, P. Permanyer SL, Pfizer, Inc., PrIME Oncology, Research to Practice, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis R&D, Takeda, Touch Medical Media, Daz Group, Lucence Health Inc., Merck Pharmaceuticals HK Ltd., Shanghai BeBirds Translation & Consulting Co. Ltd., Liangyihui Network Technology Co. Ltd., and Taiho; grants from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Inc., Roche, Takeda, Clovis Oncology, SFJ Pharmaceuticals, XCovery, and G1 Therapeutics Inc.; personal fees for supporting an advisory board for Inivata, Berry Therapeutics Inc., and G1 Therapeutics Inc.; shareholding for Aurora, Sanomics Ltd., Hutchison ChiMed; and a role on the Board of Directors for Lunit USA, Inc., AstraZeneca PLC, Hutchison ChiMed, Sanomics Ltd., Aurora. B.Y.N declares employment by Genentech and stockholding in Roche. A.S.M declares grants or contracts from NIH/NCI, Verily, Novartis, Department of Defense, and Mark Foundation; payment or honoraria to institution for lecture, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or education events from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Shanghai Roche Pharmaceuticals; patents planned, issues, or pending for patents submitted unrelated to this work; and other financial or non-financial interests from non-remunerated director of the Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation. R. De Boer declares payment of honoraria from Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Gilead; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Amgen, Novartis, and Roche. S.S. declares payment or honoraria for lectures, presentation, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educations events from Chugai Pharma, AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Nippon Boehringer-Ingelheim, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, and Company, Novartis, Kyowa Kirin, Yakult Honsha, and Towa Pharmaceutical. R. Dziadziuszko declares consulting fees from Roche, Boehringer-Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Pfizer, Foundation Medicine, Novartis, and Karyopharm; and payment or honoraria from Roche, Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer. A.S. declares payment or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, and Pfizer; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca; and participation on data safety monitoring or advisory boards for Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Takeda, AstraZeneca, BIOCAD, and Boehringer-Ingelheim. M.J.H declares payment or honoraria from Boehringer-Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Pfizer, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, and Roche; and participation on data safety monitoring or advisory boards for Boehringer-Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Pfizer, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, and Roche. M.C.G. declares grants from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck Serono, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Amgen, GSK, Sanofi; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Janssen, Lilly, Yuhan, Merck Serono, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Amgen, Libbs, and Sanofi; payment of honoraria from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Pfizer, Bayer, Roche, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Merck Serono, Janssen, and Amgen; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Pfizer, Bayer, Roche, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Merck Serono; participation on data safety monitoring or advisory boards for TEVA, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bayer, Pfizer, Roche, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Yuhan, Janssen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Amgen; and payment of honoraria for promotional activities from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Pfizer, Roche, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Novartis, TEVA, Amgen, and Janssen. C.M.G. declares research grants/funding to self from AstraZeneca; advisory/consultancy to AstraZeneca, Kisoji Biotechnology, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Bristol Myers Squibb; and speaker bureau/expert testimony for AstraZeneca and BeiGene. J.V.H declares advisory/consultancy for Bristol Myers Squibb, BrightPath Biotherapeutics, Janssen Global Services, Nexus Health Systems Pneuma Respiratory, Kairos Venture Investments, Roche, Leads Biolabs, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Catalyst, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Guardant Health, Foundation Medicine, Hengrui Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Spectrum, EMD Serono, Sanofi, Takeda, and Mirati Therapeutics; research support to AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Spectrum; and royalties/licensing fees from Spectrum. L.A.B. declares an advisory role/consultancy for AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Merck; and research funding from AstraZeneca and AbbVie. S.L. declares employment by Genentech and stockholding in Roche. A.C. declares employment by Roche and stockholding in Roche. S.M. declares employment by Roche and stockholding in Roche. L.A. declares employment by Roche and stockholding in Roche. D.S.S. declares employment by Genentech and stockholding in Roche. M.R. declares consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Merck, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Mirati, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Roche; payment of honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Merck, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Mirati, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Roche; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Merck, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Mirati, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Roche; and participation on data safety monitoring or advisory boards for DSMB Sanofi. G.L. and M.K. declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

The bone marrow failure syndromes (BMFS) are a diverse group of acquired and inherited diseases which may manifest in cytopenias, haematological malignancy and/or syndromic multisystem disease. Patients with BMFS frequently experience poor outcomes, and improved treatment strategies are needed. Collation of clinical characteristics and patient outcomes in a national disease-specific registry represents a powerful tool to identify areas of need and support clinical and research collaboration. Novel treatment strategies such as gene therapy, particularly in rare diseases, will depend on the ability to identify eligible patients alongside the molecular genetic features of their disease that may be amenable to novel therapy. The Australian Aplastic Anaemia and other Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes Registry (AAR) aims to improve outcomes for all paediatric and adult patients with BMFS in Australia by describing the demographics, treatments (including supportive care) and outcomes, and serving as a resource for research and practice improvement., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Approximately 1%-2% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) develop para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastases, which are typically considered markers of systemic disease, and are associated with a poor prognosis. The utility of PALN dissection (PALND) in patients with CRC is of ongoing debate and only small-scale retrospective studies have been published on this topic to date. This systematic review aimed to determine the utility of resecting PALN metastases with the primary outcome measure being the difference in survival outcomes following either surgical resection or non-resection of these metastases. A comprehensive systematic search was undertaken to identify all English-language papers on PALND in the PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar databases. The search results identified a total of 12 eligible studies for analysis. All studies were either retrospective cohort studies or case series. In this systematic review, PALND was found to be associated with a survival benefit when compared to non-resection. Metachronous PALND was found to be associated with better overall survival as compared to synchronous PALND, and the number of PALN metastases (2 or fewer) and a pre-operative carcinoembryonic antigen level of <5 was found to be associated with a better prognosis. No PALND-specific complications were identified in this review. A large-scale prospective study needs to be conducted to definitively determine the utility of PALND. For the present, PALND should be considered within a multidisciplinary approach for patients with CRC, in conjunction with already established treatment regimens., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Horizon scanning (HS) is the systematic identification of emerging therapies to inform policy and decision-makers. We developed an agile and tailored HS methodology that combined multi-criteria decision analysis weighting and Delphi rounds. As secondary objectives, we aimed to identify new medicines in melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer most likely to impact the Australian government's pharmaceutical budget by 2025 and to compare clinician and consumer priorities in cancer medicine reimbursement., Method: Three cancer-specific clinician panels (total n = 27) and a consumer panel (n = 7) were formed. Six prioritisation criteria were developed with consumer input. Criteria weightings were elicited using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Candidate medicines were identified and filtered from a primary database and validated against secondary and tertiary sources. Clinician panels participated in a three-round Delphi survey to identify and score the top five medicines in each cancer type., Results: The AHP and Delphi process was completed in eight weeks. Prioritisation criteria focused on toxicity, quality of life (QoL), cost savings, strength of evidence, survival, and unmet need. In both curative and non-curative settings, consumers prioritised toxicity and QoL over survival gains, whereas clinicians prioritised survival. HS results project the ongoing prevalence of high-cost medicines. Since completion in October 2021, the HS has identified 70 % of relevant medicines submitted for Pharmaceutical Benefit Advisory Committee assessment and 60% of the medicines that received a positive recommendation., Conclusion: Tested in the Australian context, our method appears to be an efficient and flexible approach to HS that can be tailored to address specific disease types by using elicited weights to prioritise according to incremental value from both a consumer and clinical perspective., Policy Summary: Since HS is of global interest, our example provides a reproducible blueprint for adaptation to other healthcare settings that integrates consumer input and priorities., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest MA has received financial support to attend conferences and meetings by AstraZeneca and serves on the advisory board for Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb. PAA has/had a consultant/advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Merck Serono, Pierre-Fabre, AstraZeneca, Sun Pharma, Canofi, Idera, Sandoz, Immunocore, 4SC, Italfarmaco, Nektar, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eisai, Regeneron, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Oncosec, Nouscom, Lunaphore, Seagen, iTeos, Medicenna, Bio-Al Health, ValoTX, Replimmune. He has received research funding grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Pfizer, Sanofi. He has received travel support from Pfizer. SA has served uncompensated on the boards of Health Issues Centre, Australia, Victorian Agency for Health Information, and Safer Care Victoria. MPB has received honoraria from BNS Australia, USD Oncology, and Novartis. He holds an advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, and Cartherics for which his institution receives reimbursements. His institution has also received reimbursement for research support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pharmaust, Zucero Therapeutics, and CStone Pharmaceuticals. MB has received compensation and research support as an advisor and consultant to Pierre Fabre, MSD, GSK, Servier, and AstraZeneca. MI is on the advisory boards of Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, BeiGene, Amgen, Merck, and MSD and has received honoraria from Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Novartis, as well as research funding from Pfizer. TJ reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca and MSD, and advisory boards and committees for AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck & Co., MSD, Gilead, Puma, Pfizer Inc., Roche AG, Specialised Therapeutics, and Takeda Pharmaceutical, outside the submitted work. SK reports honoraria to institution from Astra Zeneca, Roche, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD and Takeda; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Amgen; and research funding to institution from Astra Zeneca. MK reports institutional grants from Nordic Farma, Merck-Serono, Pierre Fabre, Servier, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, and Roche; and consulting fees and honoraria paid to institution from Pierre Fabre and Servier. BTL has served as an uncompensated advisor and consultant to Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bolt Biotherapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech, and Lilly. He has received research grants to his institution from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bolt Biotherapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech, Hengrui USA, and Lilly. He has received academic travel support from Amgen, Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine and MORE Health. He is an inventor on two institutional patents at MSK (US62/685,057, US62/514,661) and has intellectual property rights as a book author at Karger Publishers and Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press. BTL is supported by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre Support Grant P30 CA008748 and Research Project Grant R01CA249666 from the National Institutes of Health. GVL is consultant advisor for Agenus, Amgen, Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Evaxion, Hexal AG (Sandoz Company), Highlight Therapeutics S.L., Innovent Biologics USA, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, OncoSec, PHMR Ltd, Pierre Fabre, Provectus, Qbiotics, Regeneron. JML receives research support from Ipsen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis and Amgen, and reports consulting fees and/or honoraria from Amgen, Ipsen, Taiho, Novartis, SAGA Diagnostics and Natera. BM is on the advisory boards of Amgen, MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Beigene and AstraZeneca. GAM has received research support from Bristol Myers Squibb and as Principal Investigator his institution has received reimbursement of trial costs from Roche-Genentech. TMM reports consulting fees and participation on advisory boards for Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Merck, AstraZeneca, Novartis, GSK, Eisai, and honoraria from AstraZeneca. TMM has received support to attend meetings from Bristol Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca. LN has received institutional consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Merck Sharp & Dohme, and reports support to attend a research meeting from AstraZeneca. NP has served on advisory boards or received personal honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squib, Astra Zeneca, Takeda, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Ipsen and Bayer and has received research funding to his institution from Bayer, Pfizer and Roche. TMP has received research support from Roche and Pfizer, and holds a consulting or advisory role for Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Sanofi/Regeneron, and Pfizer. SP is compensated consultant to Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, EQRx, GSK, Guardant Health, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Turning Point Therapeutics, declares expert testimony to Roche and Merck Serono, and travel support from Janssen and Roche.BJS is on the Advisory Boards/Honoraria for Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, AstraZeneca, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Amgen, BeiGene, Janssen, Takeda. JAS has received support for conference attendance from MSD (virtual registration ASCO). JT has received consulting fees or honoraria from Haystack Oncology, Servier, Pierre Fabre, MSD, Merck Serono, Amgen, Novartis, Seres and AstraZeneca. JT is on the advisory boards of Beigene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Illumina, Novartis, BMS, and MSD. WX has received research support from Merck, honoraria from MSD, Merck and AstraZeneca, and support for attending meetings from MSD (virtual registration ASCO) and Eli Lilly (virtual registration SABCS). WX is on the advisory boards of MSD, Merck and Novartis, and holds unpaid positions as Chair of the Melanoma and Skin Cancer trials group and Australasian Merkel Cell Carcinoma interest group.DY has received institutional payments for his role on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Servier, Specialised Therapeutics, MSD and BayerJZ serves in an advisory/consultancy role for Merck Sharp & Dohme, Specialised Therapeutics, CEND, Deciphera, Revolution Medicine, FivePHusion, Genorbio, 1Global, Novotech, Alloplex Biotherapeutics, NOUS Consulting, and Oncology Republic; owns stock in Biomarin, Ophthea, Amarin, Concert Pharmaceuticals, Frequency Therapeutics, Gilead, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, UniQure, Zogenix, Orphazyme, Moderna Therapeutics, TWST, Novavax, and Teladoc; has received honoraria from Gilead Sciences, MSD Oncology, and Viatris; and his institution has received research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, IQvia, Mylan, Ipsen, Eisai, Medtronic, MSD Oncology and Servier; and has received travel, accommodations, expenses from ICON Group, MSD Oncology, and PRAXIS., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Ester et al report the findings from a 2-arm cluster randomized controlled trial nested within a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study, which involved a 12-week exercise and behavior change program for rural and remote Canadians (Exercise for Cancer to Enhance Living Well [EXCEL]). The addition of 23 weeks of app-based physical activity monitoring to the EXCEL program did not result in significant between-group differences in physical activity at 6 months. While several behavior change techniques were included in the initial 12-week intervention, additional techniques were embedded within the mobile app. However, there is currently a lack of evidence regarding how many and which behavior change techniques are the most effective for people with cancer and if these differ based on individual characteristics. Potentially, the use of the mobile app was not required in addition to the behavior change support delivered to both groups as part of the EXCEL program. Further research should involve participants who may be in most need of behavioral support, for example, those with lower levels of self-efficacy. Suggestions for future research to tailor behavior change support for people with cancer are discussed., (©Lara Edbrooke, Tamara L Jones. Originally published in JMIR Cancer (https://cancer.jmir.org), 28.11.2023.)

Chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) achieves durable remissions, with flattening of the progression-free survival (PFS) curve in patients with mutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable gene (IGHV-M). We updated long-term follow-up results from the original 300-patient FCR study initiated at MD Anderson in 1999. The current median follow-up is 19.0 years. With this extended follow-up, the median PFS for patients with IGHV-M was 14.6 years vs 4.2 years for patients with unmutated IGHV (IGHV-UM). Disease progression beyond 10 years was uncommon. In total, 16 of 94 (17%) patients in remission at 10 years subsequently progressed with the additional follow-up compared with the patients in our prior report in 2015. Only 4 of 45 patients (9%) with IGHV-M progressed beyond 10 years. Excluding Richter transformation, 96 of 300 patients (32%) developed 106 other malignancies, with 19 of 300 (6.3%) developing therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (tMNs), which were fatal in 16 of 19 (84%). No pretreatment patient characteristics predicted the risk of tMNs. In summary, FCR remains an option for patients with IGHV-M chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), with a significant fraction achieving functional cure of CLL. A risk-benefit assessment is warranted when counseling patients, balancing potential functional cure with the risk of late relapses and serious secondary malignancies., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Simultaneous inhibition of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) with bispecific antibodies may improve efficacy over single-agent treatment while limiting toxicity. Cadonilimab is a humanized, bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4. This is a phase 1 study of cadonilimab including dose escalation (n = 39) and dose expansion (n = 80). One dose-limiting toxicity event is observed, with the maximum tolerated dose not reached. 6 mg/kg cadonilimab once every 2 weeks is established as the recommended dose for future studies. The most common treatment-related adverse event is infusion-related reaction (18.5%), mostly grade 1/2 in severity. The incidences of any grade and grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events are 44.5% and 6.7%, respectively. The confirmed overall response rate is 13.4%, and the median duration of response is 12.9 months. Cadonilimab is well tolerated and showed promising efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03261011., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests S.F. has received research funding and honoraria from Amgen; has consulted and advised for Akeso Biopharma and Merck Sharpe and Dohme (MSD); and has received support from Amgen for attending meetings and/or travel and industry trial sponsorship to study site (principal investigator of multiple studies) from Akeso Biopharma, Ambrax, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aulos, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), BeiGene, Cullinan, Daiichi Sankyo, Edison Oncology, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda, HaiHe Biopharma, Vivace, and WMS. H.K.G. has consulted/advised for BMS, Curis, Merck Serono, and Telix. B.T. has received research funding from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Genentech, Ipsen, Janssen, Pfizer, Movember, and MSD; has received honoraria from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Tolmar; and has served in a consulting/advisory role for Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, IQVIA, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Tolmar. M.M. has received research funding from BMS and honoraria from BMS, Roche, and the Limbic; has consulted/advised for MSD, the Limbic, Roche, BMS, Takeda, Guardant Health, BeiGene Australia, Amgen, Merck, Lilly, and Novartis; and has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca. Y.Z., W.W., D.X., M.W., B.L., and M.X. are employees of Akeso Biopharma. J.D. has received institutional research funding from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene,BMS, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche/Genentech, and Eli Lilly and has consulted/advised for Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Lilly, Merck KGaA, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Antengene, and BeiGene., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Health care professionals play a central role in offering reproductive genetic carrier screening but face challenges when integrating the offer into practice. The aim of this study was to design, execute, and evaluate theory-informed implementation strategies to support health care professionals in offering carrier screening., Methods: An exploratory multi-method approach was systematically employed based on the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF). Implementation strategies were designed by aligning TDF barriers reported by health care professionals involved in a large carrier screening study, to behaviour change techniques combined with study genetic counsellors' experiential knowledge. The strategies were trialled with a subset of health care professionals and evaluated against controls, using findings from questionnaires and interviews with healthcare professionals. The primary outcome measure was the number of couples who initiated enrolment., Results: Health care professionals (n = 151) reported barriers in the TDF Domains of skills, e.g., lack of practice in offering screening, and challenges of environmental context and resources, e.g., lack of time, which informed the design of a skills video and a waiting room poster using the TDF-behaviour change technique linking tool. Following implementation, (Skills video n = 29 vs control n = 31 and Poster n = 46 vs control n = 34) TDF barrier scores decreased across all groups and little change was observed in the primary outcome measure. The skills video, though welcomed by health care professionals, was reportedly too long at seven minutes. The waiting room poster was seen as easily implementable., Conclusions: As carrier screening moves towards mainstream healthcare, health care professionals report barriers to offering screening. To meet their needs, developing and testing experiential and theory-informed strategies that acknowledge contextual factors are essential., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To systematically review the existing literature for evidence of efficacy around interventions in the management of persistent pain post radiotherapy for head and neck cancers., Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to assess the effectiveness and safety of interventions for the management of persistent post-radiotherapy pain in head and neck cancers. The primary outcome evaluated whether an intervention resulted in a reduction in pain which was determined using validated pain tools., Results: Two randomised controlled trials involving 196 participants fulfilled the inclusion criteria, one evaluating the effect of hypnotherapy and the other evaluating the effect of pregabalin on radiotherapy related pain in head and neck cancer patients. In one study by Thuma et al. (2016) there was a decrease in pain scores in the hypnotherapy group (p<0.001). In the other study, by Jiang et al. (2018) patients treated with pregabalin had a greater reduction in pain intensity, pain severity and a reduction in pain functional interference (p<0.001)., Conclusions: The findings of our review suggest that in chronic post-radiotherapy pain for head and neck cancers there is very-low level evidence for the use of hypnotherapy in reducing pain scores and for the use of pregabalin in reducing pain intensity, severity, functional interference and psychological distress with significant improvement in quality of life., (© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.)

Despite increasing availability of therapies, patients with Sezary syndrome (SS) commonly endure multi-line treatment journeys, mostly with partial responses of short duration. Measuring clinical benefit is challenging; time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) provides a robust, objective measurement of efficacy. This international observational study examines patterns of clinical care and therapeutic benefit as measured by TTNT. TTNT was calculated for monotherapies and combination therapies, with consideration to treatment line. 178 patients with SS (73% de novo, 27% secondary) were included, receiving 721 lines of systemic therapy, with median follow-up of 56.9 months. Across all lines, 58 different therapeutic regimens were prescribed (54 were systemic therapies) and classified into 17 treatment groups. The most common first-line treatments were extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP)-containing combination therapy (20%) and retinoid monotherapy (19%). Median TTNT for all first-line therapies was short (5.4 months). First-line, combination therapies had longer median TTNT than monotherapies, 10.0 vs 5.0 months (P = .004), respectively. Later delivery of combination therapies was associated with shorter clinical benefit, with median TTNT reduced to 6.2 and 2.2 months for mid-line (2nd-4th line) and late-line (≥5th line), respectively (P < .001). First-line ECP-containing treatments were associated with longer median TTNT than non-ECP-containing treatments, 9.0 vs 4.9 months (P = .007). For both ECP-monotherapy and ECP-containing combination therapy, significant reductions in TTNT were seen in later lines. These data suggest therapeutic benefit from first-line delivery of combination therapy for SS and favor early inclusion of ECP in the treatment algorithm for those who can access it., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Deregulation of the Hippo pathway is a driver for cancer progression and treatment resistance. In the context of gastric cancer, YAP1 is a biomarker for poor patient prognosis. Although genomic tumor profiling provides information of Hippo pathway activation, the present study demonstrates that inhibition of Yap1 activity has anti-tumor effects in gastric tumors driven by oncogenic mutations and inflammatory cytokines. We show that Yap1 is a key regulator of cell metabolism, proliferation, and immune responses in normal and neoplastic gastric epithelium. We propose that the Hippo pathway is targetable across gastric cancer subtypes and its therapeutic benefits are likely to be mediated by both cancer cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic mechanisms., (© 2023 Thilakasiri et al.)

Background: Disparities in cancer incidence, complex care needs, and poor health outcomes are largely driven by structural inequities stemming from social determinants of health. To date, no evidence-based clinical tool has been developed to identify newly diagnosed patients at risk of poorer outcomes. Specialist cancer nurses are well-positioned to ameliorate inequity of opportunity for optimal care, treatment, and outcomes through timely screening, assessment, and intervention. We designed a nursing complexity checklist (the "Checklist") to support these activities, with the ultimate goal of improving equitable experiences and outcomes of care. This study aims to generate evidence regarding the clinical utility of the Checklist., Objective: The primary objectives of this study are to provide qualitative evidence regarding key aspects of the Checklist's clinical utility (appropriateness, acceptability, and practicability), informed by Smart's multidimensional model of clinical utility. Secondary objectives explore the predictive value of the Checklist and concordance between specific checklist items and patient-reported outcome measures., Methods: This prospective mixed methods case series study will recruit up to 60 newly diagnosed patients with cancer and 10 specialist nurses from a specialist cancer center. Nurses will complete the Checklist with patient participants. Within 2 weeks of Checklist completion, patients will complete 5 patient-reported outcome measures with established psychometric properties that correspond to specific checklist items and an individual semistructured interview to explore Checklist clinical utility. Interviews with nurses will occur 12 and 24 weeks after they first complete a checklist, exploring perceptions of the Checklist's clinical utility including barriers and facilitators to implementation. Data describing planned and unplanned patient service use will be collected from patient follow-up interviews at 12 weeks and the electronic medical record at 24 weeks after Checklist completion. Descriptive statistics will summarize operational, checklist, and electronic medical record data. The predictive value of the Checklist and the relationship between specific checklist items and relevant patient-reported outcome measures will be examined using descriptive statistics, contingency tables, measures of association, and plots as appropriate. Qualitative data will be analyzed using a content analysis approach., Results: This study was approved by the institution's ethics committee. The enrollment period commenced in May 2022 and ended in November 2022. In total, 37 patients with cancer and 7 specialist cancer nurses were recruited at this time. Data collection is scheduled for completion at the end of May 2023., Conclusions: This study will evaluate key clinical utility dimensions of a nursing complexity checklist. It will also provide preliminary evidence on its predictive value and information to support its seamless implementation into everyday practice including, but not limited to, possible revisions to the Checklist, instructions, and training for relevant personnel. Future implementation of this Checklist may improve equity of opportunity of access to care for patients with cancer., International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/48432., (©Holly Chung, Amelia Hyatt, Elizabeth Crone, Donna Milne, Sanchia Aranda, Karla Gough, Meinir Krishnasamy. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 09.11.2023.)

Purpose: Medication non-adherence is a well-recognised problem in cancer care, negatively impacting health outcomes and healthcare resources. Patient-related factors influencing medication adherence (MA) are complicated and interrelated. There is a need for qualitative research to better understand their underlying interaction processes and patients' needs to facilitate the development of effective patient-tailored complex interventions. This study aimed to explore experiences, perceptions, and needs relating to MA and side effect management of patients who are self-administering anti-cancer treatment., Methods: Semi-structured audio-recorded interviews with patients who have haematological cancer were conducted. A comparative, iterative, and predominantly inductive thematic analysis approach was employed., Results: Twenty-five patients from a specialist cancer hospital were interviewed. While self-administering cancer medications at home, patients' motivation to adhere was affected by cancer-related physical reactions, fears, cancer literacy and beliefs, and healthcare professional (HCP) and informal support. Patients desired need for regular follow-ups from respectful, encouraging, informative, responsive, and consistent HCPs as part of routine care. Motivated patients can develop high adherence and side effect self-management over time, especially when being supported by HCPs and informal networks., Conclusion: Patients with cancer need varied support to medically adhere to and manage side effects at home. HCPs should adapt their practices to meet the patients' expectations to further support them during treatment. We propose a multi-dimensional and technology- and theory-based intervention, which incorporates regular HCP consultations providing tailored education and support to facilitate and maintain patient MA and side effect self-management., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: In-depth immunogenicity studies of tixagevimab-cilgavimab (T-C) are lacking, including following breakthrough coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in vaccinated patients with hematologic malignancy (HM) receiving T-C as pre-exposure prophylaxis., Methods: We performed a prospective, observational cohort study and detailed immunological analyses of 93 patients with HM who received T-C from May 2022, with and without breakthrough infection, during a follow-up period of 6 months and dominant Omicron BA.5 variant., Results: In 93 patients who received T-C, there was an increase in Omicron BA.4/5 receptor-binding domain (RBD) immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody titers that persisted for 6 months and was equivalent to 3-dose-vaccinated uninfected healthy controls at 1 month postinjection. Omicron BA.4/5 neutralizing antibody was lower in patients receiving B-cell-depleting therapy within 12 months despite receipt of T-C. COVID-19 vaccination during T-C treatment did not incrementally improve RBD or neutralizing antibody levels. In 16 patients with predominantly mild breakthrough infection, no change in serum neutralization of Omicron BA.4/5 postinfection was detected. Activation-induced marker assay revealed an increase in CD4 + (but not CD8 + ) T cells post infection, comparable to previously infected healthy controls., Conclusions: Our study provides proof-of-principle for a pre-exposure prophylaxis strategy and highlights the importance of humoral and cellular immunity post-breakthrough COVID-19 in vaccinated patients with HM., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. B. W. T. has been on the advisory board for Moderna, Takeda, and CSL-Behring; has received research funding from MSD and Seqirus; and has received honoraria from Pfizer, Alexion, and Janssen that were paid to his institution. M. A. S. has served on data safety monitoring and adjudication committees or advisory committees for Gilead Sciences, F2G, Cidara, Takeda, Merck, Roche, and Pfizer, and has received research funding from Gilead Sciences, Merck, and F2G. J. F. S. has served on the advisory board for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, BMS, Gilead, Roche, and Janssen; served on a scientific advisory board for Genor Biopharma; has received research funding from AbbVie, BMS, and Roche; has served on speakers’ bureaus for AbbVie, BMS, and Roche; and is a consultant and has given expert testimony to TG Therapeutics. T. S. has received compensation for serving on scientific advisory boards, honoraria for consultancy, and funding for travel from Biogen. All other authors report no potential conflicts., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)